TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Romans 4:1–8. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here the apostle proves that Abraham was justified not by works, but by faith. Those that of all men contended most vigorously for a share in righteousness by the privileges they enjoyed, and the works they performed, were the Jews, and therefore he appeals to the case of Abraham their father, and puts his own name to the relation, being a Hebrew of the Hebrews: Abraham our father. Now surely his prerogative must needs be as great as theirs who claim it as his seed according to the flesh. Now what has he found? All the world is seeking; but, while the most are wearying themselves for very vanity, none can be truly reckoned to have found, but those who are justified before God; and thus Abraham, like a wise merchant, seeking goodly pearls, found this one pearl of great price. What has he found, kata sarka - as pertaining to the flesh, that is, by circumcision and his external privileges and performances? These the apostle calls flesh, Phi 3:3. Now what did he get by these? Was he justified by them? Was it the merit of his works that recommended him to God's acceptance? No, by no means, which he proves by several arguments.
I.If he had been justified by works, room would have been left for boasting, which must for ever be excluded.
If so, he hath whereof to glory (Rom 4:2), which is not to be allowed. "But," might the Jews say, "was not his name made great (Gen 12:2), and then might not he glory?" Yes, but not before God; he might deserve well of men, but he could never merit of God. Paul himself had whereof to glory before men, and we have him sometimes glorying in it, yet with humility; but nothing to glory in before God, Co1 4:4; Phi 3:8, Phi 3:9. So Abraham. Observe, He takes it for granted that man must not pretend to glory in any thing before God; no, not Abraham, as great and as good a man as he was; and therefore he fetches an argument from it: it would be absurd for him that glorieth to glory in any but the Lord.
II.It is expressly said that Abraham's faith was counted to him for righteousness.
What saith the scripture? Rom 4:3. In all controversies in religion this must be our question, What saith the scripture? It is not what this great man, and the other good man, say, but What saith the scripture? Ask counsel at this Abel, and so end the matter, Sa2 2:18. To the law, and to the testimony (Isa 8:20), thither is the last appeal. Now the scripture saith that Abraham believed, and this was counted to him for righteousness (Gen 15:6); therefore he had not whereof to glory before God, it being purely of free grace that it was so imputed, and having not in itself any of the formal nature of a righteousness, further than as God himself was graciously pleased so to count it to him. It is mentioned in Genesis, upon occasion of a very signal and remarkable act of faith concerning the promised seed, and is the more observable in that it followed upon a grievous conflict he had had with unbelief; his faith was now a victorious faith, newly returned from the battle. It is not the perfect faith that is required to justification (there may be acceptable faith where there are remainders of unbelief), but the prevailing faith, the faith that has the upper hand of unbelief.
III.If he had been justified by faith, the reward would have been of debt, and not of grace, which is not to be imagined.
This is his argument (Rom 4:4, Rom 4:5): Abraham's reward was God himself; so he had told him but just before (Gen 15:1), I am thy exceeding great reward. Now, if Abraham had merited this by the perfection of his obedience, it had not been an act of grace in God, but Abraham might have demanded it with as much confidence as ever any labourer in the vineyard demanded the penny he had earned. But this cannot be; it is impossible for man, much more guilty man, to make God a debtor to him, Rom 11:35. No, God will have free grace to have all the glory, grace for grace's sake, Joh 1:16. And therefore to him that worketh not - that can pretend to no such merit, nor show any worth or value in his work, which may answer such a reward, but disclaiming any such pretension casts himself wholly upon the free grace of God in Christ, by a lively, active, obedient faith - to such a one faith is counted for righteousness, is accepted of God as the qualification required in all those that shall be pardoned and saved. Him that justifieth the ungodly, that is, him that was before ungodly. His former ungodliness was no bar to his justification upon his believing: ton asebē - that ungodly one, that is, Abraham, who, before his conversion, it should seem, was carried down the stream of the Chaldean idolatry, Jos 24:2. No room therefore is left for despair; though God clears not the impenitent guilty, yet through Christ he justifies the ungodly.
IV.He further illustrates this by a passage out of the Psalms, where David speaks of the remission of sins, the prime branch of justification, as constituting the happiness and blessedness of a man, pronouncing blessed, not the man who has no sin, or none which deserved death (for then, while man is so sinful, and God so righteous, where would be the blessed man?) but the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sin, who though he cannot plead, Not guilty, pleads the act of indemnity, and his plea is allowed. It is quoted from Psa 32:1, Psa 32:2, where observe,
1.The nature of forgiveness. It is the remission of a debt or a crime; it is the covering of sin, as a filthy thing, as the nakedness and shame of the soul. God is said to cast sin behind his back, to hide his face from it, which, and the like expressions, imply that the ground of our blessedness is not our innocency, or our not having sinned (a thing is, and is filthy, though covered; justification does not make the sin not to have been, or not to have been sin), but God's not laying it to our charge, as it follows here: it is God's not imputing sin (Rom 4:8), which makes it wholly a gracious act of God, not dealing with us in strict justice as we have deserved, not entering into judgment, not marking iniquities, all which being purely acts of grace, the acceptance and the reward cannot be expected as debts; and therefore Paul infers (Rom 4:6) that it is the imputing of righteousness without works.
2.The blessedness of it: Blessed are they. When it is said, Blessed are the undefiled in the way, blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the wicked, etc., the design is to show the characters of those that are blessed; but when it is said, Blessed are those whose iniquities are forgiven, the design is to show what that blessedness is, and what the ground and foundation of it. Pardoned people are the only blessed people. The sentiments of the world are, Those are happy that have a clear estate, and are out of debt to man; but the sentence of the word is, Those are happy that have their debts to God discharged. O how much therefore is it our interest to make it sure to ourselves that our sins are pardoned! For this is the foundation of all other benefits. So and so I will do for them; for I will be merciful, Heb 8:12.
Historical interpretation
Nine Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Paul shows from the example of Abraham that faith is not given only to those who are under the law and the circumcision, but also to those who are not circumcised. For Abraham was not justified by his works either, nor did he have any reason to boast, for he was imperfect and apart from God he could do nothing.… Abraham our father was justified by faith. Paul calls him the “forefather according to the flesh” of those Israelites who have become sons of God by the Spirit. For Christ was made like them in his birth according to the flesh, and now he has made them like him through his birth by grace in the Spirit.
After showing that no one can be justified before God by the works of the law, Paul goes on to say that Abraham could not merit anything according to the flesh either. In saying “the flesh,” Paul meant circumcision, because Abraham sought nothing on the basis of his circumcision. For he was already justified before he was circumcised.
He had said that the world had become guilty before God, and that all had sinned, and that boasting was excluded and that it was impossible to be saved otherwise than by faith. He is now intent upon showing that this salvation, so far from being matter of shame, was even the cause of a bright glory, and a greater than that through works. For since the being saved, yet with shame, had somewhat of dejection in it, he next takes away this suspicion too. And indeed he has hinted at the same already, by calling it not barely salvation, but "righteousness. Therein" (he says) "is the righteousness of God revealed." For he that is saved as a righteous man has a confidence accompanying his salvation. And he calls it not "righteousness" only, but also the setting forth of the righteousness of God. But God is set forth in things which are glorious and shining, and great.
And he calls him "father, as pertaining to the flesh," to throw them out of the genuine relationship to him, and to pave the Gentiles' way to kinsmanship with him. And then he says, "For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory: but not before God." After saying that God "justified the circumcision by faith and the uncircumcision through faith," and making the same sufficiently sure in what he said before, he now proves it by Abraham more clearly than he promised, and pitches the battle for faith against works, and makes this righteous man the subject of the whole struggle.
For the great power of Paul is especially displayed in this, that he turns what is objected to the other side, and shows that what seemed rather to be on the side of salvation by works, viz. glorying or boldness of claim belonged much more truly to that by faith. For he that glorieth in his works has his own labors to put forward: but he that finds his honor in having faith in God, has a much greater ground for glorying to show, in that it is God that he glorifieth and magnifieth.
Paul calls the Jews back to the beginning of circumcision, so that what it originally stood for might be fully understood.
After excluding the glory which the Jews took in the Law, on the basis of which they preferred themselves to the Gentiles [n. 169 and 248], the Apostle now excludes their glory in regard to circumcision. About which he does two things. First, he takes up the question he had raised earlier [n. 247], when he asked: "What is the usefulness of circumcision?" And because Abraham was the first to receive the command about circumcision, as stated in Genesis 17(:10), he repeats the question in the person of Abraham himself, saying: If it is true that God justifies the uncircumcised as well as the circumcised, What usefulness then shall we say Abraham to have found, who is our father according to the flesh? That is, according to circumcision and other bodily observances. For it does not seem fitting to say that he found no usefulness, since it is stated in Isaiah 48(:17), "I am the Lord, your God, who teaches you useful things." 323. Secondly, when he says, For if Abraham, he answers the question he had raised. He does two things. First, he shows that Abraham did not obtain justification through circumcision and the other works of the Law, but rather through faith; secondly, he commends his faith, there [v.18; n. 367] at who against hope. In regard to the first he does two things. First, he explains his position with a reason based on divine acceptance; secondly, by reason of God’s promise, there [v. 13; n. 351] at For not through the Law. In regard to the first he does three things. 167 First, he proposes a conditional statement; secondly, disproves the consequent, there [v.3; n. 326] at For what do the Scriptures say?; thirdly, he proves the conditional statement, there [v. 6; n. 332] at As David also. 324. In regard to the first the Apostle intends to argue in the following manner: If Abraham were justified from works of the Law, he would have no glory with God; therefore, he was not justified from works. Hence, he presents the conditional [statement, saying]: It has been asked what Abraham found in virtue of bodily circumcision, and it is obvious that he did not find himself justified from works of the law, such that his justice consisted in the works of the Law. For he has glory, namely, before men, who see the outward works, but not before God, who sees in secret: "The Lord looks on the heart" (1 Sam l6:7); "So let no one boast of men" (1 Cor 3:21). Hence it is written against some that "they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God" (John l2:43). 325. Against this one might object that becoming accustomed to outward works generates an inward habit, according to which a man’s heart is also well disposed and so made ready to perform well and take pleasure in good works, as the Philosopher teaches in Ethics II. The answer is that this takes place in human justice, through which man is ordained to the human good. For the habit of this justice can be acquired through human works, but the justice which obtains glory before God is ordained to the divine good, namely future glory, which exceeds human ability, as is stated in 1 Cor 2(:9), "It has not arisen in the heart of man what God has prepared for those who love him." 168 Consequently, a man’s works are not proportioned to causing the habit of this justice; rather, a man’s heart needs first to be justified inwardly by God, so that he can perform works proportioned to divine glory. 326. Then when he says For what do the Scriptures say, he disproves the consequent, which was negative, by proving the opposite affirmative, namely, that Abraham did have glory before God. He proves this on the authority of Scripture: first, he cites the authority; secondly, he explains, there [v. 4; n. 328] at Now, to him. 327. First, therefore, he says: I say that Abraham was justified in a way that gave him glory before God. For what do the Scriptures say (Gen 15:6): Abraham believed God who promised that his seed would be multiplied. "Believe God and he will help you" (Sir 2:6). And it was reputed to him, i.e., by God, as justice: "Was not Abraham found faithful when tested?" (1 Macc 2:52). Consequently, it is clear that before God, by whom that he believed was reckoned to him as justice, he has glory. But it should be noted that Abraham expressed the justice described, which God regards, not in some outward work but in the inward faith of the heart, which God alone sees. Indeed, since the act of faith is said to be threefold, namely, to believe God [Deum], to believe God [Deo] and to believe unto God [in Deum], he mentions this act, namely to believe God [Deo], which is the proper act of faith and indicates its nature [species]. For to believe unto God shows the ordering of faith to its end, which is through charity; for to believe unto God is to go to God by believing, which charity does. Consequently, it follows upon the nature of faith. 169 But to believe God [Deum] indicates the matter of faith taken as a theological virtue, having God for its object. Consequently, this act does not yet attain the nature of faith, because if one believes in God in virtue of certain human reasons and natural signs, he is not yet said to have the faith of which we now speak, but only when he believes something for the reason that it was said by God—which is indicated by the phrase, "to believe God [Deo]." It is from this that faith takes its nature [specificatur], just as any cognitive habit takes its nature from the reason in virtue of which it assents to something. For a person possessing scientific philosophical knowledge is inclined to assent to its statements for one reason, namely, through demonstration, but one having the habit of opinion is inclined to assent for a different reason, namely, through a dialectical syllogism. 328. Then, when he says Now, to him who works, he explains the aforementioned biblical citation as regards the words it was reputed to him as justice. Two explanations of these words are given in the Gloss. In the first explanation they are linked to the final reward, concerning which first, he shows how it is related to works; secondly, how it is related to faith, there [v. 5; n. 330] at But to him who does not work. 329. First, therefore, he says that to him who works the works of justice, the reward of eternal recompense—concerning which Isaiah 40(:10) says, "Behold his reward is with him"—are not reckoned as a gift [secundum gratiam] only but as his due: "Did you not agree with me for a denarius?" (Mt 20:2). 170 But on the contrary it is stated below (6:23), "The free gift [gratia] of God is eternal life," and again: "The sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed to us" (Rom 8:18). Therefore, that reward is not made as due, but as a gift. The answer is that human works can be considered in two ways. In one way, according to the substance of the works, and considered this way they do not have anything deserving [condignum] that the award of eternal glory should be given. In another way, they can be considered according to their source, namely, insofar as they are performed under God’s impulse in accord with the intention of God who predestines. And in this respect the aforesaid reward is due them by debt, because, as is stated below (8:14): "All who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God"; "and if sons, then heirs" (8:17). 330. Then (v. 5) he shows how the eternal award is related to faith, saying, but to one who does not work outward works, for example, because he does not have time to work, as in the case of one who dies immediately after baptism, but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, namely, in God, of whom he says below (8:33): "It is God who justifies," his faith is reckoned, i.e., faith alone without outward works, as righteousness, so that in virtue of it he is called just and receives the reward of justice, just as if he had done the works of justice, as he says below (10:10): "Man believes with his heart and so is justified," according the purpose of the grace of God, i.e., accordingly as God proposes to save men gratuitously: "Who are called according to his purpose (Rom 8:28); "He accomplishes all things according to the counsel of his will" (Eph 1:11). 331. Another explanation refers those words to man’s justification. 171 Then to the one who works, i.e., if anyone be justified by works, the justice would be reckoned not as a gift but as his due: "If it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace" (Rom 11:6). But to him who does not work, so as to be justified by his works, but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith will be reckoned as justice according to the purpose of God’s grace, not that he merits justice through faith, but because the believing itself is the first act of the justice God works in him. For from the fact that he believes in God justifying, he submits himself to his justification and thus receives its effect. This is the literal explanation and accords with the intention of the Apostle, who lays special stress on the words, "it was reckoned to him as righteousness (Gen 15:6)" a saying which is used when that which is lacking on someone’s part is reckoned to him gratis, as if he had accomplished the whole. That is why the Apostle says that such reckoning would have no place, if righteousness were from works, but only as it is from faith. 332. Then when he says As also David (v. 6) he proves the conditional statement by a quotation from a psalm. First, he gives its sense; secondly, he presents its words, there [v. 7; n. 334] at Blessed they whose; thirdly, he excludes a false interpretation, there [v. 9; n. 339] at So does this blessedness? 333. He says: So also David pronounces a blessing [happiness] upon the man to whom God reckons, i.e., confers, justice apart from works, i.e., gratis, without preceding works: "Not because of deeds done by us in righteousness" (Titus 3:5). 172 But man’s happiness is from God, as Ps 40 (v.5) says: "Blessed is the man who makes the Lord his hope." Hence, it is plain that he has glory before God who is justified not by the works of the Law, as has been said. 334. Then when he says Blessed they (v. 7) he presents David’s words containing the previous judgment and says that those whose sins are forgiven are blessed; consequently, they did not previously have good works, from which they obtained righteousness or happiness. 335. But sin is divided into three classes: original, actual mortal and actual venial. First, in regard to original sin he says: Blessed are those whose iniquities are forgiven. Here it should be noted that original sin is called iniquity, because it is the lack of that original justice, by which in equity man’s reason was subject to God, the lower powers to reason, and the body to the soul. This equity is removed by original sin, because after reason ceased to be subject to God, the lower powers rebel against reason and the body is withdrawn from obedience to the soul and subjected to decay and death. Hence Ps 51 (v.5) says: "I was brought forth in iniquities." In both texts original sin is presented in the plural, either because of the multitude of men in whom original sin is multiplied or better because it virtually contains within itself all sins in some way. Such original sin is said to be forgiven, because the reatus passes with the coming of grace, but the effect remains in the form of fomes or concupiscence, which is not entirely taken away in this life, but is remitted or mitigated. 336. Secondly, in regard to actual mortal sin he says, and whose sins are covered. 173 For sins are said to be covered from the divine gaze, inasmuch as he does not look upon them to be punished: "Thou didst cover all their sin" (Ps 85:2). 337. Thirdly, in regard to venial sin he says, blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not reckon his sin, where sin refers to venial sins which, although light, if they be many, man is separated and distant from God: "The good Lord will pardon everyone who sets his heart to seek God, even though not according to the sanctuary’s rules of cleanness" (2 Ch 30:18). 338. These three can be distinguished in another way. For in sin are three things, one of which is offense against God. In regard to this he says, blessed are those whose iniquities are forgiven, the way man is said to remit an offense committed against him: "Her iniquity is pardoned" (Is 40:2). The second thing is the fact that the disordered deed has been done and cannot be said not to have occurred, once it has been perpetrated; but it is covered over by the hand of God’s mercy and is held as if not committed. The third is the debt of punishment, in regard to which he says: Blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not reckon his sin, i.e., to punish. 339. Then when he says So does this blessedness (v. 9) he excludes a false interpretation of the text. For a Jew could interpret it as meaning that the grace of forgiveness of sins is conferred only on the circumcised. Therefore, to exclude this the Apostle first raises the question, Is this blessing by which God confers righteousness without works, pronounced only upon the circumcised, i.e., affects only the circumcised, or also upon the uncircumcised, i.e. on the Gentiles? 174 Plainly it is for both, according to what he says below (10:12): "The same Lord bestows his riches upon all who call upon him." Secondly, there at For we say, to show this he appeals to the authority of Scripture (Gen 15:6), as if to say: I ask this, because we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham as righteousness. Thirdly, from this text he concludes to the answer, although he states it in the form of a question: How then was it reckoned to him, namely, Abraham’s faith as justice, i.e., was it before, i.e., when still uncircumcised, or after he had been circumcised? He answers: It was not after, but before he was circumcised. This is obvious from the reported sequence of events. For Gen (15:6) reports that faith was reckoned to Abraham as righteousness, but the fact of receiving circumcision is not recorded until Gen (17:23 ff). Therefore, if Abraham, still uncircumcised, was justified by faith, it is plain that the justice of faith, through which sins are forgiven gratis, occurs not only in circumcision but also in uncircumcision, i.e., in Gentiles.
Continue studying Romans 4:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Romans 4:1 introduces a pivotal shift in Paul's argument, moving from the universal condemnation of humanity under sin and the revelation of God's righteousness through faith in Romans 3 to a concrete historical example. This verse serves as a rhetorical question, directly challenging the Jewish understanding of justification by asking what Abraham, the revered patriarch, gained "as pertaining to the flesh"—that is, through human effort, lineage, or adherence to the Law. It sets the stage for Paul to demonstrate that Abraham's righteousness was credited to him by faith, not by works, thereby dismantling the notion of human merit as the basis for divine favor.
Context
Literary Context
Romans 4:1 immediately follows Paul's profound declaration in Romans 3:21-31 that righteousness from God is revealed apart from the Law, received through faith in Jesus Christ, and is available to all who believe. Having established that both Jews and Gentiles are under sin and that justification is by grace through faith, Paul anticipates the natural objection from his Jewish audience: "What then becomes of Abraham, our father?" This verse thus acts as a crucial bridge, using Abraham as the prime Old Testament example to substantiate his radical claim that justification is by faith alone, not by works of the Law or ethnic heritage. The subsequent verses in Romans 4 meticulously unpack Abraham's story from Genesis 15:6 to prove this point.
Historical & Cultural Context
For the Jewish people of Paul's day, Abraham was not merely a historical figure but the foundational patriarch, the recipient of God's covenant promises, and the father of their nation. His obedience and righteousness were often understood as a model for how one gained favor with God, particularly through circumcision and adherence to the Mosaic Law, which they believed flowed from Abraham's lineage. There was a strong cultural emphasis on ancestral merit and the idea that being a descendant of Abraham automatically conferred a special standing with God. Paul's question in Romans 4:1 directly confronts this deeply ingrained cultural and theological understanding, challenging the notion that one's ethnic identity or works of the Law could be the basis for justification before God. He aims to reframe Abraham's story to show that even the father of their faith was justified by a principle of grace through faith, predating the Law and circumcision.
Key Themes
This verse introduces several critical themes that Paul develops throughout Romans. Firstly, it highlights Justification by Faith as the central theological concept, using Abraham as the quintessential example. Paul argues that Abraham's righteousness was "counted" or "credited" to him by faith, not by any works or merits of his own (Romans 4:3-5). Secondly, it underscores the theme of Abraham as the Archetype of Faith, demonstrating that God's method of dealing with humanity has always been consistent—through faith, not through human achievement or ethnic identity. This challenges the prevailing Jewish understanding and broadens the scope of God's salvation to include Gentiles. Thirdly, the phrase "as pertaining to the flesh" introduces the critical Contrast between Flesh and Spirit/Faith, a recurring motif in Paul's theology. "Flesh" (Greek: sarx) here represents human effort, natural descent, and adherence to external religious observances (like the Law or circumcision), which Paul argues are insufficient for achieving righteousness before God. This sets the stage for the argument that true righteousness comes from God's gracious provision, received through faith.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This is the Hebrew patriarch, a foundational figure in both Jewish and Christian faith. Paul's immediate invocation of Abraham signals a direct engagement with the Jewish understanding of salvation and lineage, positioning Abraham as the ultimate test case for his argument regarding justification by faith. The name itself signifies "father of a multitude," foreshadowing his spiritual fatherhood to believers from all nations.
In this context, "flesh" refers not merely to the physical body but to human nature in its unredeemed state, characterized by its reliance on human effort, natural descent, and external religious practices (such as the Law or circumcision) apart from God's grace. Paul uses this term to distinguish between what Abraham might have achieved through his own human endeavors or lineage versus what he received from God by faith.
This verb means "to find," "to get," or "to obtain." The question "hath found?" implies a search or a method by which Abraham achieved his standing before God. Paul's subsequent argument will reveal that what Abraham "found" (righteousness and acceptance with God) was not through his own works or merit, but through his faith, which God then credited to him as righteousness.
Verse Breakdown
"What shall we say then"
This is a classic Pauline rhetorical device, signaling a shift in argument and anticipating a likely objection or question from his audience. It invites the reader to consider the logical implications of his preceding arguments about universal sin and justification by faith.
"that Abraham our father"
Paul immediately introduces Abraham, the revered patriarch and the progenitor of the Jewish nation. By referring to him as "our father," Paul acknowledges Abraham's supreme importance to his Jewish readers, making the subsequent discussion about Abraham's justification all the more impactful and challenging to their established beliefs.
"as pertaining to the flesh"
This crucial phrase specifies the angle from which Abraham's achievements are being considered. It refers to what Abraham might have gained through his own human effort, natural lineage, or adherence to religious observances (like circumcision, which is discussed later in Romans 4). It sets up a stark contrast with the spiritual means of justification that Paul is about to expound.
"hath found?"
This interrogative completes the rhetorical question, asking what Abraham "discovered," "obtained," or "gained" by means of "the flesh." The implied answer, which Paul will elaborate on, is "nothing" in terms of meriting justification before God. This question effectively challenges the notion that Abraham's special status was due to his own works or ethnic identity.
Literary Devices
Romans 4:1 primarily employs a Rhetorical Question. Paul uses this device not to elicit an answer from his audience, but to provoke thought and to set the stage for his subsequent argument. By asking "What then shall we say that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?", he anticipates the Jewish objection to his doctrine of justification by faith alone. This question also introduces a powerful Contrast between "the flesh" (human effort, lineage, Law-keeping) and the true means of justification (faith), which he will immediately clarify through Abraham's example. Furthermore, Abraham functions as an Archetype or Type, serving as a representative figure whose experience illustrates a universal theological principle—that righteousness is imputed by faith, not earned by works.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Romans 4:1 is foundational to Paul's exposition of justification by faith, a core doctrine of the Christian faith. It directly challenges the prevailing Jewish understanding that one's standing before God was based on lineage, circumcision, or adherence to the Mosaic Law. By posing the question about Abraham's "fleshly" achievements, Paul prepares to demonstrate that God's method of declaring people righteous has always been consistent: it is a gracious act based on faith, not human merit. This verse underscores the radical nature of God's grace, emphasizing that salvation is a gift received, not a reward earned. It shifts the focus from human performance to divine initiative, aligning with the broader biblical narrative of God's sovereign election and redemptive plan.
Reflection and Application
Romans 4:1 serves as a powerful reminder that our standing before God is never based on our own efforts, our family heritage, our religious rituals, or our perceived good works. Just as Paul challenges the first-century Jewish understanding of Abraham's righteousness, this verse challenges us today to examine the true basis of our hope and assurance. Are we relying on our own "flesh"—our moral conduct, our church attendance, our charitable giving, or even our theological knowledge—to earn God's favor? Or are we, like Abraham, resting solely on God's gracious promise and responding with simple faith? This verse calls us to humility, recognizing that any attempt to justify ourselves through human means is futile. Our acceptance by God is a pure gift, received through faith in Jesus Christ, not something we can achieve. It encourages us to abandon self-reliance and embrace the liberating truth that our righteousness comes from outside ourselves, from Christ alone.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does Paul immediately bring up Abraham in Romans 4:1 after discussing justification by faith in Romans 3?
Paul introduces Abraham in Romans 4:1 because Abraham was the revered patriarch of the Jewish nation, a figure central to their identity and understanding of how one gained favor with God. After arguing in Romans 3 that all humanity, both Jews and Gentiles, are under sin and justified by faith apart from the Law, Paul anticipates the Jewish objection: "What about Abraham? Surely he was justified by his obedience to the Law or by his circumcision, or by being the father of our nation!" By bringing Abraham into the discussion, Paul aims to demonstrate that even Abraham, the father of their faith, was justified by faith, not by works of the Law or by his ethnic identity. This allows Paul to show that justification by faith is not a new concept but is consistent with God's dealings throughout history, even predating the Mosaic Law.
What does "as pertaining to the flesh" mean in this context?
The phrase "as pertaining to the flesh" (Greek: kata sarka) in Romans 4:1 refers to human effort, natural descent, or external religious observances as a means of gaining righteousness or favor with God. It contrasts with a spiritual or faith-based approach. For the Jewish audience, this would specifically include reliance on their lineage as descendants of Abraham, their circumcision, or their adherence to the Mosaic Law. Paul's question challenges the idea that Abraham "found" or gained anything of spiritual merit through these human, "fleshly" means. He argues that Abraham's true righteousness came from his faith, which God credited to him, not from anything he did in the flesh. This concept is crucial for understanding Paul's broader argument that salvation is by grace through faith, not by works (Ephesians 2:8-9).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Romans 4:1, by setting up the question of Abraham's justification, profoundly points to Christ-centered fulfillment. Paul's argument that Abraham was justified by faith, not by works of the flesh, establishes a universal principle that finds its ultimate expression and object in Jesus Christ. Abraham's faith in God's promise, which was "counted to him for righteousness" (Romans 4:3), foreshadows the believer's faith in Christ's finished work on the cross. The righteousness that Abraham received by imputation is the same righteousness that is now freely offered to all who believe in Jesus, who "was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification" (Romans 4:25). Christ is the ultimate "seed" to whom the promises to Abraham ultimately refer (Galatians 3:16), and through faith in Him, both Jews and Gentiles become true "children of Abraham" (Galatians 3:7), inheriting the blessing of justification. Thus, Abraham's experience becomes a divine pattern, revealing that God's plan for salvation has always been centered on faith, culminating in the person and work of Jesus, who is the perfect embodiment and object of that saving faith.