Skip to content

Mark 3:27

“The Beelzebul Accusation”Mark 3:20–30
King James Version
No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
No man G3762 can G3756 G1410 enter G1525 into G1519 a strong man's G2478 house G3614, and spoil G1283 his G846 goods G4632, except G3362 he will G1210 first G4412 bind G1210 the strong man G2478; and G2532 then G5119 he will spoil G1283 his G846 house G3614.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Indeed, no one can enter a strong man’s house to steal his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man. Then he can plunder his house.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
But no one can enter into the house of the strong man, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
But no one can enter into the house of the strong man to plunder, unless he first binds the strong man; and then he will plunder his house.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
No man can enter into a strong mans house, and take away his goods, except hee first binde that strong man, and then spoyle his house.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
`No one is able the vessels of the strong man--having entered into his house--to spoil, if first he may not bind the strong man, and then his house he will spoil.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
25 Greek words
  1. οὐounotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  2. δύναταιdunataiis ableG1410V-PNI-3SVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Indicative 3rd Singular
  3. οὐδεὶςoudeisno [one]G3762A-NSMAdjective Nominative Singular Masculine
  4. εἰςeisintoG1519PREPPreposition
  5. τὴνtēntheG3588T-ASFDefinite article Accusative Singular Feminine
  6. οἰκίανoikianhouseG3614N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
  7. τοῦtouof theG3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
  8. ἰσχυροῦischuroustrong manG2478A-GSMAdjective Genitive Singular Masculine
  9. εἰσελθὼνeiselthōnhaving enteredG1525V-2AAP-NSMVerb 2nd Aorist Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  10. τὰtatheG3588T-APNDefinite article Accusative Plural Neuter
  11. σκεύηskeuēgoodsG4632N-APNNoun Accusative Plural Neuter
  12. αὐτοῦautouof himG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  13. διαρπάσαιdiarpasaito plunderG1283V-AANVerb Aorist Active Infinitive
  14. ἐὰνeanonlyG1437CONDConjunction
  15. μὴmēunlessG3361PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  16. πρῶτονprōtonfirstG4413A-ASNAdjective Accusative Singular Neuter
  17. τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  18. ἰσχυρὸνischuronstrong manG2478A-ASMAdjective Accusative Singular Masculine
  19. δήσῃdēsēhe shall bindG1210V-AAS-3SVerb Aorist Active Subjunctive 3rd Singular
  20. καὶkaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
  21. τότεtotethenG5119ADVAdverb
  22. τὴνtēntheG3588T-ASFDefinite article Accusative Singular Feminine
  23. οἰκίανoikianhouseG3614N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
  24. αὐτοῦautouof himG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  25. διαρπάσειdiarpaseihe will plunderG1283V-FAI-3SVerb Future Active Indicative 3rd Singular
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 24,316 of 31,102 · 78.2%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Only someone stronger can bind a strong man and plunder his house, and Jesus’ casting out of devils shows that he has bound Satan and is setting his captives free.

“No man can enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods,”

Satan guards what he holds.

“except he will first bind the strong man;”

The binding comes first, and the devils Jesus casts out show that it has happened.

“and then he will spoil his house.”

The plunder is people set free.

The Stronger Man and the Unforgivable Sin

Mark 3:20–30

Summary

Jesus comes back to a house, and the crowd gathers again until he and his disciples are kept from even eating. His family hears of it and sets out to take hold of him, sure that he has lost his mind. Scribes who have come down from Jerusalem tell the people that he has Beelzebub and drives out devils by the prince of devils. Jesus calls them to him and answers in short parables. A kingdom or a house at war with itself falls, so if Satan were driving out Satan, his rule would be at an end. What is really happening is that a stronger one has come into the strong man’s house, bound him, and begun to carry off what he held. Then Jesus speaks a sweeping promise of forgiveness and a solemn warning. Every sin and every blasphemy can be forgiven, but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Ghost “hath never forgiveness”. Mark adds why he said it: they were calling the Spirit’s work in him an unclean spirit.

A crowd that left no time to eat

This scene comes straight after Jesus chooses the twelve (Mark 3:13–19), who were to be with him, to preach and to cast out devils. He has gone back into a house, likely in Capernaum, the centre of his work in Galilee. From the first chapter of Mark his teaching and healing had drawn people (Mark 1), and lately they had come from far beyond Galilee (Mark 3:7–8).

The multitude, ochlos, is the ordinary word for a crowd or throng of people. It “cometh together” (synérchomai, to come together or assemble) “again” (pálin), because this has happened before. The crowd would have held the sick and the troubled, the curious and the devout, and, as the next verses show, some who had come to find fault.

“So that they could not so much as eat bread” gives the result. To “eat bread” is the usual way of saying to have a meal, and “so much as” makes the statement as strong as it can be. The verb behind “could”, dýnamai, means to be able, and with the negative mḗ it says that eating was impossible for them. People ask whether this is an exaggeration. The crowd made a meal impossible in practice, filling every moment and every space, for houses were modest, often built around a small courtyard, and quickly packed. Jesus and the twelve went hungry because the people kept coming.

Jesus gives himself to people at a real cost to himself. Later he calls the disciples away to rest for a while (Mark 6:31). He had nowhere to lay his head (Matthew 8:20, Luke 9:58), and he told his disciples that his food was to do the will of the one who sent him (John 4:31–34). There is a quiet irony in the scene as well. The one who would call himself the bread of life (John 6:35) goes without bread because of the people he came to feed. He came to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many (Mark 10:45), and this hungry day in a crowded house is a small early picture of that giving.

Why his family said, “He is beside himself”

The KJV’s “his friends” translates hoi par’ autou, “those from beside him” or “his own people”. In this setting it means his family. His mother and brothers arrive later in the chapter (Mark 3:31–35), most likely on this same errand. They heard (akoúō) of the crowds and the missed meals, and they went out (exérchomai, to go or come out) “to lay hold on him”. That verb, kratéō, means to seize, so they meant to take him home, by force if need be.

Their reason was this: “He is beside himself.” Exístēmi means literally to put or stand out of one’s wits. It can describe astonishment, and here it means to be out of one’s mind. They saw a man who drew crowds day and night, went without food and set himself against the religious leaders, and they decided that his mind had given way. They may well have feared for his safety too, and for the family’s good name, which counted for a great deal in their world.

Their concern was real, and so was their blindness. John tells us that his brothers did not believe in him at this time (John 7:5). In this same chapter the unclean spirits knew who he was and cried it out (Mark 3:11), while those of his own house thought him mad. Isaiah foretold that he would be despised and rejected (Isaiah 53:3), and John writes that he came to his own and his own received him not (John 1:11). What looked like madness to them was perfect obedience to the Father. Paul says that the message of the cross is foolishness to those who perish, and to us who are saved it is the power and the wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:18–25). At the end of this chapter Jesus calls those who do the will of God his brother, his sister and his mother.

The charge from Jerusalem

The scribes, grammateús, from a word for writing, were trained experts and teachers of the Law of Moses. These scribes “came down from Jerusalem”, the city of the temple and the seat of the nation’s religious authority, and the phrase fits its high standing. Their journey shows that the leaders in the capital were now watching Jesus closely, and their verdict would weigh heavily with the crowd. By now he had shown his authority over the Sabbath (Mark 2:23–28, Mark 3:1–6), and his following among ordinary people threatened their standing. They had no way to explain away what he did, so they gave it the worst explanation they could find.

The charge has two parts. “He hath Beelzebub” means that he is possessed, held by this spirit. “By the prince of the devils casteth he out devils” says where his power comes from. Árchōn, “prince”, means a ruler or chief, first in rank. Daimónion, “devils”, is the New Testament’s word for demons, the evil spirits who serve Satan. Ekbállō, “cast out”, means to throw or drive out. Verse 30 gives the charge again in its plainest form: “He hath an unclean spirit.”

The scribes grant that the devils really leave at his word. Mark has already told us how amazed the people were that he commanded unclean spirits and they obeyed him (Mark 1:27). The scribes dispute only the source, and so they call good evil, the very thing Isaiah pronounced a woe upon (Isaiah 5:20). Matthew and Luke tell of the same accusation (Matthew 12:24, Luke 11:15).

Who is Beelzebub?

The KJV spells the name Beelzebub, and the Greek is Beelzeboúl. It goes back to Baal-zebub, a god of the Philistines worshipped at Ekron (2 Kings 1:2), whose name means “lord of flies”. The form in the Gospels is a mocking play on that name, understood as “lord of dung”. By Jesus’ day it had become a name of contempt for the chief of the evil spirits, and Jesus answers the charge by speaking of Satan, so in this passage the two names point to the same enemy.

How can Satan cast out Satan?

Jesus “called them unto him”. The verb proskaléomai means to summon, so he answers the scribes face to face. He speaks “in parables”. A parabolē can be a long story, and it can just as well be a comparison, a proverb or a short pointed saying, which is what we have here: a question followed by short pictures.

The question is “How can Satan cast out Satan?” Its “can” is dýnamai, the same verb as “could” in verse 20, and its “cast out” is ekbállō, the scribes’ own word from verse 22. The question takes their claim at its word for a moment and shows where it leads.

A kingdom and a house divided

First comes a kingdom. Basileía comes from basileús, king, and means a king’s rule or the realm he rules. Then comes a house. Oikía is a house, and by extension the household living in it with all that belongs to it. In both sayings “divided” is the same verb, merízō, to part or split up, and here it means split into sides that fight each other. Both sayings end the same way, with “cannot stand”. The Greek joins ou, “not”, to dýnamai and hístēmi, to stand, so it says that such a kingdom or household is unable to stay on its feet. Everyone listening knew what civil war does to a nation and what a feud does to a family. Matthew and Luke record the same sayings (Matthew 12:25–26, Luke 11:17–18).

The sayings carry a lesson for God’s people too. Paul pleads with the church at Corinth to speak the same thing and to be perfectly joined together in the same mind (1 Corinthians 1:10). The kingdom Christ rules stands firm. Hebrews calls it “a kingdom which cannot be moved” (Hebrews 12:28), and Jesus says of his church that “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18).

“He cannot stand, but hath an end”

Verse 26 applies the sayings to Satan. Satanâs is a name of Aramaic origin meaning the adversary or accuser, the devil himself. If he “rise up against himself, and be divided”, he is finished: “he cannot stand, but hath an end”. Télos means an end, the point where something stops. The scribes’ charge leads straight to Satan tearing down his own rule. Satan’s kingdom is evil, yet it holds together in its war against God, and he works to keep what he has. So the casting out of devils has to come from a power set against him, and that power is God’s. Scripture says that God anointed Jesus of Nazareth “with the Holy Ghost and with power” (Acts 10:38).

The strong man bound

Verse 27 tells what is really happening: “No man can enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house.” The strong man, ischyrós, is mighty and forcible. To bind, déō, is to tie up. To spoil, diarpázō, is to plunder, to seize and carry off. A strong man guards his own house, and whoever means to empty it has to overpower him and tie him up first. Only then can the goods be carried out.

In the picture the strong man is Satan, his house is his domain, and his goods are the people he holds captive by sin, sickness and the power of demons. Every person Jesus sets free is plunder carried out of that house, so his casting out of devils is the evidence that the strong man has met someone stronger and has been bound. The kingdom of God had come near, as Jesus proclaimed from the start (Mark 1:15), and he would later say that he saw Satan fall (Luke 10:18). John writes that the Son of God was manifested to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:8), and the victory goes back to the first promise, that the serpent’s head would be crushed (Genesis 3:15).

When was the strong man bound?

Jesus binds him through the whole of his work. He withstood Satan’s temptation in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1–11), drove out devils with a word, and above all defeated him at the cross and in the resurrection. Of the cross Paul writes, “And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it” (Colossians 2:15), using in the KJV the English word of verse 27. Through death Christ destroyed him that had the power of death (Hebrews 2:14), and he now holds the keys of death (Revelation 1:18). Jesus spoke of the prince of this world being cast out (John 12:31).

The binding leaves Satan powerless to stop Jesus from rescuing those he holds, though he still works in the world until the end. Revelation speaks of a final binding (Revelation 20:1–3) and of the devil cast at last into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:10), which is the “end” of verse 26 in full. Meanwhile the plundering goes on wherever the gospel is preached and people are delivered from the power of darkness and brought into the kingdom of God’s dear Son (Colossians 1:13).

All sins shall be forgiven

“Verily I say unto you” marks what follows as solemn and certain. Amḗn comes from Hebrew, from a root meaning firm or sure, and it is a strong affirmation, “truly”. In the Gospels this opening belongs to Jesus’ own way of speaking, and he sets it before his words on his own authority.

Then comes the promise: “All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme.” “The sons of men” means human beings. “Sins” is hamártēma, an act of sin, from a verb meaning to miss the mark. “Blasphemies” is blasphēmía, evil-speaking or slander, especially against God or holy things, and the verb “blaspheme” is blasphēméō. Under the law of Moses blasphemy was punished by death (Leviticus 24:16), yet Jesus places even blasphemy within the reach of forgiveness. “Shall be forgiven” speaks of God’s act, and Mark has already recorded the question, who can forgive sins but God alone (Mark 2:7). The one who speaks this promise has that authority.

God is ready to forgive. Though our sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow (Isaiah 1:18). He removes our transgressions from us as far as the east is from the west (Psalm 103:10–12), and if we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive them (1 John 1:9). Jesus came to call sinners to repentance (Luke 5:32).

This forgiveness rests on Christ himself. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29) and the propitiation for our sins (1 John 2:2), and “without shedding of blood is no remission” (Hebrews 9:22). God reconciles us to himself through Christ (2 Corinthians 5:18–19), the one mediator between God and men (1 Timothy 2:5), and he calls us to repent and be baptized for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38). Against that wide promise, the one exception in the next verse stands out all the more.

What is the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost?

It is what the scribes were doing in this scene: looking at the Holy Spirit’s work in Jesus, as devils fled at his word, and calling it the work of the devil. Mark makes this plain in verse 30. Jesus gave the warning “Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.” “Said” is légō, the common verb for speaking, and their words were a considered verdict. The Spirit who is holy was called akáthartos, unclean or impure. Pneûma, spirit, covers the Holy Spirit and evil spirits alike, and the scribes put the one in the other’s place.

The sentence on this sin is the heaviest in the passage. Such a person “hath never forgiveness”. Áphesis means release, pardon, the remission of sins, and here it is shut off. He “is in danger of eternal damnation”, which means he is liable to it. “Damnation” is krísis, judgment or condemnation, and “eternal”, aiṓnios, means lasting without end.

This sin stands apart because of what it rejects. God’s power to forgive is boundless, and forgiveness comes through repentance, which is the Spirit’s work in a sinner. The Spirit bears witness to Christ (John 15:26) and convicts the world of sin, of righteousness and of judgment (John 16:8–11). A person who sees that witness plainly and calls it Satan’s work has set himself against the only one who could lead him to repentance. It is a settled hardening of the heart, light seen clearly and named darkness. Hebrews gives warnings of the same weight, about those whom it is impossible to renew again to repentance (Hebrews 6:4–6) and about sinning wilfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth (Hebrews 10:26–31). Matthew and Luke record the same warning, and they add that a word spoken against the Son of man shall be forgiven (Matthew 12:31–32, Luke 12:10).

Can a believer commit this sin?

A believer in whom the Holy Spirit lives is kept from it, because the Spirit in him goes on convicting him of sin and bringing him back in repentance. Jesus is describing a heart that has hardened itself for good against God’s plain work, and the scribes who slandered him are his example. Those who are afraid that they have committed this sin show by that very fear a tenderness toward the Spirit’s voice and a desire for God’s grace, which is the opposite of the heart Jesus warns against.

The stronger one, and the open door

In these verses we meet a Lord who spends himself for the crowds, who is misread by his own family and slandered by the experts of his day, and who answers the slander calmly with the truth. His family thought him mad while he was doing his Father’s work, so a disciple who is misunderstood by those closest to him stands where his Lord stood.

He is stronger than the strong man. Everyone Satan holds can be carried out of his house, because Christ has bound him and is plundering it still. And the same Lord opens the door of forgiveness as wide as words can open it, to “all sins” and to “blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme”. The one sin he names as never forgiven is the refusal of the Spirit who brings sinners to him, so the warning is for the hardened heart and the comfort is for anyone who comes. Whoever confesses Jesus as Lord and believes that God raised him from the dead shall be saved (Romans 10:9–10), for he is the way, the truth and the life (John 14:6).

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Mark 3:22–30. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 9 verses
Passage under commentMark 3:22–30
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

I.Here is, The impudent impious brand which the scribes fastened upon Christ's casting out devils, that they might evade and invalidate the conviction of it, and have a poor excuse for not yielding to it. These scribes came down from Jerusalem, Mark 3:22. It should seem they came this long journey on purpose to hinder the progress of the doctrine of Christ; such pains did they take to do mischief; and, coming from Jerusalem, where were the most polite and learned scribes, and where they had opportunity of consulting together against the Lord and his Anointed, they were in the greater capacity to do mischief; the reputation of scribes from Jerusalem would have an influence not only upon the country people, but upon the country scribes; they had never thought of this base suggestion concerning Christ's miracles till the scribes from Jerusalem put it into their heads. They could not deny but that he cast out devils, which plainly bespoke him sent of God; but they insinuated that he had Beelzebub on his side, was in league with him, and by the prince of the devils cast out devils. There is a trick in the case; Satan is not cast out, he only goes out by consent. There was nothing in the manner of Christ's casting out devils, that gave any cause to suspect this; he did it as one having authority; but so they will have it, who resolve not to believe him.

II.The rational answer which Christ gave to this objection, demonstrating the absurdity of it.

1.Satan is so subtle, that he will never voluntarily quit his possession; If Satan cast out Satan, his kingdom is divided against itself, and it cannot stand, Mark 3:23-26. He called them to him, as one desirous they should be convinced; he treated them with all the freedom, friendliness, and familiarity that could be; he vouchsafed to reason the case with them, that every mouth may be stopped. It was plain that the doctrine of Christ made war upon the devil's kingdom, and had a direct tendency to break his power, and crush his interest in the souls of men; and it was as plain that the casting of him out of the bodies of people confirmed that doctrine, and gave it the setting on; and therefore it cannot be imagined that he should come into such a design; every one knows that Satan is no fool, nor will act so directly against his own interest.

2.Christ is so wise, that, being engaged in war with him, he will attack his forces wherever he meets them, whether in the bodies or souls of people, Mark 3:27. It is plain, Christ's design is to enter into the strong man's house, to take possession of the interest he has in the world, and to spoil his goods, and convert them to his own service; and therefore it is natural to suppose that he will thus bind the strong man, will forbid him to speak when he would, and to stay where he would, and thus show that he has gained a victory over him.

III.The awful warning Christ gave them to take heed how they spoke such dangerous words as these; however they might make light of them, as only conjectures, and the language of free-thinking, if they persisted in it, it would be of fatal consequence to them; it would be found a sin against the last remedy, and consequently unpardonable; for what could be imagined possible to bring them to repentance for their sin in blaspheming Christ, who would set aside such a strong conviction with such a weak evasion? It is true, the gospel promiseth, because Christ hath purchased, forgiveness for the greatest sins and sinners, Mark 3:28. Many of those who reviled Christ on the cross (which was a blaspheming of the Son of man, aggravated to the highest degree), found mercy, and Christ himself prayed, Father, forgive them; but this was blaspheming the Holy Ghost, for it was by the Holy Spirit that he cast out devils, and they said, It was by the unclean spirit, Mark 3:30. By this method they would outface the conviction of all the gifts of the Holy Ghost after Christ's ascension, and defeat them all, after which there remained no more proof, and therefore they should never have forgiveness, but were liable to eternal damnation. They were in imminent danger of that everlasting punishment, from which there was no redemption, and in which there was no intermission, no remission.

Historical interpretation

Nine Centuries of Reception

10 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

10 quotes · AD 202–1150
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
200300400500600700800900100011001200

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Pseudo-Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274SourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Or this is meant; that he will not deserve to work out repentance, so as to be accepted, who, understanding who Christ was, declared that He was the prince of the devils.
d. AD 202IrenaeusAnte-NiceneSourceAGAINST HERESIES 5.21.3
The adversary enticed humanity to transgress our maker’s law, and thereby got us into his clutches. Yet his power consisted only in tempting the human will toward trespass and apostasy. With these chains he bound up the human will. This is why in the economy of salvation it was necessary that he be bound with the same chains by which he had bound humanity. It would be through a man that humanity would be set free to return to the Lord, leaving the adversary in those bonds by which he himself had been fettered, that is, sin. For when Satan is bound, man is set free; since “none can enter a strong man’s house and spoil his goods, unless he first bind the strong man himself.” It is in this way that he became exposed as the opposer of the Word who made all things, and subdued by his command. The new man showed him to be a fugitive from the law, and an apostate from God. He then was securely bound as a fugitive, and his goods hauled away. These goods are those who had been in bondage, whom he had unjustly used for his own purposes. So it was a just means by which he was led captive, who had led humanity into captivity unjustly. In this way humanity was rescued from the clutches of its possessor by the tender mercy of God the Father, who had compassion on his own handiwork, and gave to it salvation, restoring it by means of the Word, Christ, in order that humanity might learn from this actual event that they receive incorruptibility not of themselves, but by the free gift of God.
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceON THE TRINITY 13.15.19
It is not difficult, therefore, to see how the devil was conquered when he, who was slain by him, rose again. But there is something greater and more profound of comprehension: to see how the devil was conquered precisely when he was thought to be conquering, namely, when Christ was crucified. For at that moment the blood of him who had no sin at all, was shed for the remission of our sins. The devil deservedly held those whom he had bound by sin to the condition of death. So it happened that One who was guilty of no sin freed them justly from this condemnation. The strong man was conquered by this paradoxical justice and bound by this chain, that his vessels might be taken away. Those vessels which had been vessels of wrath were turned into vessels of mercy.
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceCity of God 20.7
The “strong man” in this passage means the devil who was able to hold the human race in bondage. By his “goods,” which Christ was coming to plunder, the devil was keeping for himself those who would in time become faithful, but had remained in the clutches of ungodliness and various sins. It was for the purpose of binding up this strong man that John, in the Apocalypse, saw “an angel coming down from heaven, having the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, the ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.” The angel checked and repressed his power to seduce and possess those destined to be set free.
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceON THE TRINITY 13.14.18
He conquered the devil first by righteousness, and then by power. First by righteousness, because he who had no sin was slain by him most unjustly. But then by power, because having been dead he lived again, never afterwards to die. For Christ was crucified, not through immortal power, but through the weakness which he took upon him in mortal flesh. Of this weakness the apostle nevertheless says, “God’s weakness is stronger than human strength.”
AD 500Pseudo-Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) The blasphemy of the Scribes having been detailed, our Lord shows that what they said was impossible, confirming His proof by an example. Wherefore it says, And having called them together unto him, he said unto them in parables. How can Satan cast out Satan? As if He had said, A kingdom divided against itself by civil war must be desolated, which is exemplified both in a house and in a city. Wherefore also if Satan's kingdom be divided against itself, so that Satan expels Satan from men, the desolation of the kingdom of the devils is at hand. But their kingdom consists in keeping men under their dominion. If therefore they are driven away from men, it amounts to nothing less than the dissolution of their kingdom. But if they still hold their power over men, it is manifest that the kingdom of evil is still standing, and Satan is not divided against himself.

(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) He says indeed, that blasphemy concerning Himself was pardonable, because He then seemed to be a man despised and of the most lowly birth, but, that contumely against God has no remission. Now blasphemy against the Holy Ghost is against God, for the operation of the Holy Ghost is the kingdom of God; and for this reason, He says, that blasphemy against the Holy Ghost cannot be remitted. Instead, however, of what is here added, But will be in danger of eternal damnation, another Evangelist says, Neither in this world, nor in the world to come. By which is understood, the judgment which is according to the law, and that which is to come. For the law orders one who blasphemes God to be slain, and in the judgment of the second law he has no remission. nHowever, he who is baptized is taken out of this world; but the Jews were ignorant of the remission which takes place in baptism. He therefore who refers to the devil miracles, and the casting out of devils which belong to the Holy Ghost alone, has no room left him for remission of his blasphemy. Neither does it appear that such a blasphemy as this is remitted, since it is against the Holy Ghost. Wherefore he adds, explaining it, Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceOn the Gospel of Mark
No one can enter the house of the strong man and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man, and then he will plunder his house. He calls the strong man the devil, his goods, the men deceived by him; his house, the world which lies in wickedness. In which until the coming of the Savior, he exercised a wretchedly pacified dominion, because he rested quietly in the hearts of the unbelievers without any contradiction. But the Lord bound the strong man, that is, he restrained the devil from deceiving the elect, and then plundered his house, because he united to the members of his Church those whom he foresaw would be rescued from the devil's snares and whom he designated to various orders of dignity within it. Or certainly, he plundered his house because he distributed all the parts of the world, over which the ancient enemy once ruled, to the successors of the apostles, so that each in his own province would lead back the people converted from error to the way of life. The Lord therefore showed through the parable, but now very clearly, that he did not free men from demons through a deceitful operation in agreement with them, as they slandered, but with a completely different and opposing power of divinity: and thus they committed a great crime who said that what they recognized to be of God was from the devil.
d. AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(in Marc. i. 17) The Lord has also bound the strong man, that is, the devil: which means, He has restrained him from seducing the elect, and entering into his house, the world; He has spoiled his house, and his goods, that is men, because He has snatched them from the snares of the devil, and has united them to His Church. Or, He has spoiled his house, because the four parts of the world, over which the old enemy had sway, He has distributed to the Apostles and their successors, that they may convert the people to the way of life. But the Lord shows that they committed a great sin, in crying out that that which they knew to be of God, was of the devil, when He subjoins, Verily I say unto you, All sins are forgiven, &c. All sins and blasphemies are not indeed remitted to all men, but to those who have gone through a repentance in this life sufficient for their sins; thus neither is Novatusm right, who denied that any pardon should be granted to penitents, who had lapsed in time of martyrdom; nor Origen, who asserts that after the general judgment, after the revolution of ages, all sinners will receive pardon for their sins, which error the following words of the Lord condemn, when He adds, But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, &c.

(ubi sup.) Neither however are those, who do not believe the Holy Spirit to be God, guilty of an unpardonable blasphemy, because they were persuaded to do this by human ignorance, not by devilish malice.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of Ohridas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
The meaning of the example is this: The devil is the strong man; his goods are the men into whom he is received; unless therefore a man first conquers the devil, how can he deprive him of his goods, that is, of the men whom he has possessed? So also I who spoil his goods, that is, free men from suffering by his possession, first spoil the devils and vanquish them, and am their enemy. How then can ye say that I have Beelzebub, and that being the friend of the devils, I cast them out?

We must however understand, that they will not obtain pardon unless they repent. But since it was at the flesh of Christ that they were offended, even though they did not repent, some excuse was allowed them, and they obtained some remission.
AD 1150Glossa Ordinariaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) And because He has already shown by an example that a devil cannot cast out a devil, He shows how he can be expelled, saying, No man can enter into a strong man's house, &c.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Mark 3:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8