- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Mark 3:22–30. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
I.Here is, The impudent impious brand which the scribes fastened upon Christ's casting out devils, that they might evade and invalidate the conviction of it, and have a poor excuse for not yielding to it. These scribes came down from Jerusalem, Mar 3:22. It should seem they came this long journey on purpose to hinder the progress of the doctrine of Christ; such pains did they take to do mischief; and, coming from Jerusalem, where were the most polite and learned scribes, and where they had opportunity of consulting together against the Lord and his Anointed, they were in the greater capacity to do mischief; the reputation of scribes from Jerusalem would have an influence not only upon the country people, but upon the country scribes; they had never thought of this base suggestion concerning Christ's miracles till the scribes from Jerusalem put it into their heads. They could not deny but that he cast out devils, which plainly bespoke him sent of God; but they insinuated that he had Beelzebub on his side, was in league with him, and by the prince of the devils cast out devils. There is a trick in the case; Satan is not cast out, he only goes out by consent. There was nothing in the manner of Christ's casting out devils, that gave any cause to suspect this; he did it as one having authority; but so they will have it, who resolve not to believe him.
II.The rational answer which Christ gave to this objection, demonstrating the absurdity of it.
1.Satan is so subtle, that he will never voluntarily quit his possession; If Satan cast out Satan, his kingdom is divided against itself, and it cannot stand, Mar 3:23-26. He called them to him, as one desirous they should be convinced; he treated them with all the freedom, friendliness, and familiarity that could be; he vouchsafed to reason the case with them, that every mouth may be stopped. It was plain that the doctrine of Christ made war upon the devil's kingdom, and had a direct tendency to break his power, and crush his interest in the souls of men; and it was as plain that the casting of him out of the bodies of people confirmed that doctrine, and gave it the setting on; and therefore it cannot be imagined that he should come into such a design; every one knows that Satan is no fool, nor will act so directly against his own interest.
2.Christ is so wise, that, being engaged in war with him, he will attack his forces wherever he meets them, whether in the bodies or souls of people, Mar 3:27. It is plain, Christ's design is to enter into the strong man's house, to take possession of the interest he has in the world, and to spoil his goods, and convert them to his own service; and therefore it is natural to suppose that he will thus bind the strong man, will forbid him to speak when he would, and to stay where he would, and thus show that he has gained a victory over him.
III.The awful warning Christ gave them to take heed how they spoke such dangerous words as these; however they might make light of them, as only conjectures, and the language of free-thinking, if they persisted in it, it would be of fatal consequence to them; it would be found a sin against the last remedy, and consequently unpardonable; for what could be imagined possible to bring them to repentance for their sin in blaspheming Christ, who would set aside such a strong conviction with such a weak evasion? It is true, the gospel promiseth, because Christ hath purchased, forgiveness for the greatest sins and sinners, Mar 3:28. Many of those who reviled Christ on the cross (which was a blaspheming of the Son of man, aggravated to the highest degree), found mercy, and Christ himself prayed, Father, forgive them; but this was blaspheming the Holy Ghost, for it was by the Holy Spirit that he cast out devils, and they said, It was by the unclean spirit, Mar 3:30. By this method they would outface the conviction of all the gifts of the Holy Ghost after Christ's ascension, and defeat them all, after which there remained no more proof, and therefore they should never have forgiveness, but were liable to eternal damnation. They were in imminent danger of that everlasting punishment, from which there was no redemption, and in which there was no intermission, no remission.
Historical interpretation
Eleven Centuries of Reception
10 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Or this is meant; that he will not deserve to work out repentance, so as to be accepted, who, understanding who Christ was, declared that He was the prince of the devils.
The adversary enticed humanity to transgress our maker’s law, and thereby got us into his clutches. Yet his power consisted only in tempting the human will toward trespass and apostasy. With these chains he bound up the human will. This is why in the economy of salvation it was necessary that he be bound with the same chains by which he had bound humanity. It would be through a man that humanity would be set free to return to the Lord, leaving the adversary in those bonds by which he himself had been fettered, that is, sin. For when Satan is bound, man is set free; since “none can enter a strong man’s house and spoil his goods, unless he first bind the strong man himself.” It is in this way that he became exposed as the opposer of the Word who made all things, and subdued by his command. The new man showed him to be a fugitive from the law, and an apostate from God. He then was securely bound as a fugitive, and his goods hauled away. These goods are those who had been in bondage, whom he had unjustly used for his own purposes. So it was a just means by which he was led captive, who had led humanity into captivity unjustly. In this way humanity was rescued from the clutches of its possessor by the tender mercy of God the Father, who had compassion on his own handiwork, and gave to it salvation, restoring it by means of the Word, Christ, in order that humanity might learn from this actual event that they receive incorruptibility not of themselves, but by the free gift of God.
It is not difficult, therefore, to see how the devil was conquered when he, who was slain by him, rose again. But there is something greater and more profound of comprehension: to see how the devil was conquered precisely when he was thought to be conquering, namely, when Christ was crucified. For at that moment the blood of him who had no sin at all, was shed for the remission of our sins. The devil deservedly held those whom he had bound by sin to the condition of death. So it happened that One who was guilty of no sin freed them justly from this condemnation. The strong man was conquered by this paradoxical justice and bound by this chain, that his vessels might be taken away. Those vessels which had been vessels of wrath were turned into vessels of mercy.
The “strong man” in this passage means the devil who was able to hold the human race in bondage. By his “goods,” which Christ was coming to plunder, the devil was keeping for himself those who would in time become faithful, but had remained in the clutches of ungodliness and various sins. It was for the purpose of binding up this strong man that John, in the Apocalypse, saw “an angel coming down from heaven, having the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, the ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.” The angel checked and repressed his power to seduce and possess those destined to be set free.
He conquered the devil first by righteousness, and then by power. First by righteousness, because he who had no sin was slain by him most unjustly. But then by power, because having been dead he lived again, never afterwards to die. For Christ was crucified, not through immortal power, but through the weakness which he took upon him in mortal flesh. Of this weakness the apostle nevertheless says, “God’s weakness is stronger than human strength.”
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) The blasphemy of the Scribes having been detailed, our Lord shows that what they said was impossible, confirming His proof by an example. Wherefore it says, And having called them together unto him, he said unto them in parables. How can Satan cast out Satan? As if He had said, A kingdom divided against itself by civil war must be desolated, which is exemplified both in a house and in a city. Wherefore also if Satan's kingdom be divided against itself, so that Satan expels Satan from men, the desolation of the kingdom of the devils is at hand. But their kingdom consists in keeping men under their dominion. If therefore they are driven away from men, it amounts to nothing less than the dissolution of their kingdom. But if they still hold their power over men, it is manifest that the kingdom of evil is still standing, and Satan is not divided against himself.
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) He says indeed, that blasphemy concerning Himself was pardonable, because He then seemed to be a man despised and of the most lowly birth, but, that contumely against God has no remission. Now blasphemy against the Holy Ghost is against God, for the operation of the Holy Ghost is the kingdom of God; and for this reason, He says, that blasphemy against the Holy Ghost cannot be remitted. Instead, however, of what is here added, But will be in danger of eternal damnation, another Evangelist says, Neither in this world, nor in the world to come. By which is understood, the judgment which is according to the law, and that which is to come. For the law orders one who blasphemes God to be slain, and in the judgment of the second law he has no remission. nHowever, he who is baptized is taken out of this world; but the Jews were ignorant of the remission which takes place in baptism. He therefore who refers to the devil miracles, and the casting out of devils which belong to the Holy Ghost alone, has no room left him for remission of his blasphemy. Neither does it appear that such a blasphemy as this is remitted, since it is against the Holy Ghost. Wherefore he adds, explaining it, Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.
No one can enter the house of the strong man and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man, and then he will plunder his house. He calls the strong man the devil, his goods, the men deceived by him; his house, the world which lies in wickedness. In which until the coming of the Savior, he exercised a wretchedly pacified dominion, because he rested quietly in the hearts of the unbelievers without any contradiction. But the Lord bound the strong man, that is, he restrained the devil from deceiving the elect, and then plundered his house, because he united to the members of his Church those whom he foresaw would be rescued from the devil's snares and whom he designated to various orders of dignity within it. Or certainly, he plundered his house because he distributed all the parts of the world, over which the ancient enemy once ruled, to the successors of the apostles, so that each in his own province would lead back the people converted from error to the way of life. The Lord therefore showed through the parable, but now very clearly, that he did not free men from demons through a deceitful operation in agreement with them, as they slandered, but with a completely different and opposing power of divinity: and thus they committed a great crime who said that what they recognized to be of God was from the devil.
(in Marc. i. 17) The Lord has also bound the strong man, that is, the devil: which means, He has restrained him from seducing the elect, and entering into his house, the world; He has spoiled his house, and his goods, that is men, because He has snatched them from the snares of the devil, and has united them to His Church. Or, He has spoiled his house, because the four parts of the world, over which the old enemy had sway, He has distributed to the Apostles and their successors, that they may convert the people to the way of life. But the Lord shows that they committed a great sin, in crying out that that which they knew to be of God, was of the devil, when He subjoins, Verily I say unto you, All sins are forgiven, &c. All sins and blasphemies are not indeed remitted to all men, but to those who have gone through a repentance in this life sufficient for their sins; thus neither is Novatusm right, who denied that any pardon should be granted to penitents, who had lapsed in time of martyrdom; nor Origen, who asserts that after the general judgment, after the revolution of ages, all sinners will receive pardon for their sins, which error the following words of the Lord condemn, when He adds, But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, &c.
(ubi sup.) Neither however are those, who do not believe the Holy Spirit to be God, guilty of an unpardonable blasphemy, because they were persuaded to do this by human ignorance, not by devilish malice.
The meaning of the example is this: The devil is the strong man; his goods are the men into whom he is received; unless therefore a man first conquers the devil, how can he deprive him of his goods, that is, of the men whom he has possessed? So also I who spoil his goods, that is, free men from suffering by his possession, first spoil the devils and vanquish them, and am their enemy. How then can ye say that I have Beelzebub, and that being the friend of the devils, I cast them out?
We must however understand, that they will not obtain pardon unless they repent. But since it was at the flesh of Christ that they were offended, even though they did not repent, some excuse was allowed them, and they obtained some remission.
(non occ.) And because He has already shown by an example that a devil cannot cast out a devil, He shows how he can be expelled, saying, No man can enter into a strong man's house, &c.
Continue studying Mark 3:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
In Mark 3:27, Jesus employs a vivid parable to powerfully refute the scribes' blasphemous accusation that He casts out demons by the power of Beelzebub. This analogy of a "strong man" whose house must first be entered and he himself bound before his possessions can be plundered, serves as a profound declaration of Jesus' divine authority and His decisive victory over Satan, illustrating that His exorcisms are not an alliance with evil, but rather a direct assault on the kingdom of darkness, demonstrating the inbreaking of God's sovereign rule.
Context
Literary Context
Mark 3:27 is the climax of Jesus' powerful rebuttal to the scribes from Jerusalem who accused Him of being possessed by Beelzebub and casting out demons by the ruler of demons (Mark 3:22). This accusation immediately follows an incident where Jesus' own family sought to restrain Him, believing He was "beside himself" (Mark 3:21). Jesus systematically dismantles the scribes' illogical charge by first presenting the self-defeating nature of a divided kingdom or house (Mark 3:23-26). His argument is that Satan cannot cast out Satan, for that would mean his kingdom is divided and cannot stand. Mark 3:27 then provides the conclusive, positive assertion: Jesus' ability to cast out demons is not a sign of alliance with Satan, but rather undeniable proof that He is the one stronger than Satan, who has already "bound" him, thereby demonstrating His superior power and authority. This parable sets the stage for Jesus' subsequent warning about the unforgivable sin against the Holy Spirit (Mark 3:28-30), emphasizing the gravity of attributing the Spirit's work to demonic power.
Historical & Cultural Context
The accusation against Jesus, that He was in league with Beelzebub (a derogatory name for Baal-zebub, the Philistine god of Ekron, meaning "lord of the flies" or "lord of dung," used here as a chief demon or Satan himself), was a grave one in first-century Jewish society. Exorcism was recognized, but the source of power was crucial. Jewish exorcists sometimes invoked God's name, but attributing such power to demonic forces was considered blasphemous. The scribes, as religious authorities from Jerusalem, represented the established religious order and their opposition carried significant weight. Their accusation highlights a fundamental misunderstanding or willful rejection of Jesus' true identity and mission. The concept of a "strong man" guarding his possessions would have been a familiar image, evoking the idea of a powerful, well-entrenched adversary. Jesus' use of this parable would have resonated with His audience, making His point about spiritual authority clear and undeniable within their cultural framework.
Key Themes
Mark 3:27 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in the Gospel of Mark. Primarily, it underscores Christ's Authority Over Satan and Demonic Forces. The "strong man" is unequivocally Satan, and Jesus' ability to "bind" him and "spoil his goods" demonstrates His absolute supremacy over the kingdom of darkness. This theme is central to Mark's portrayal of Jesus as the powerful Son of God who has come to inaugurate God's reign. Secondly, the verse highlights the reality of Spiritual Warfare and Deliverance. Jesus' ministry is depicted not merely as teaching or healing, but as a direct, confrontational engagement with evil, liberating those held captive by demonic oppression. The "spoiling of his goods" symbolizes the rescue and restoration of humanity from Satan's dominion. Finally, this parable serves as compelling evidence for the Inbreaking of God's Kingdom. Jesus' actions—casting out demons, healing the sick, and teaching with authority—are tangible signs that the kingdom of God has arrived and is actively challenging and overcoming the prevailing dominion of darkness, as seen throughout His ministry, from His initial call for repentance because the kingdom of God is at hand to His ultimate victory.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From ἰσχύς (ischys), meaning "force." This adjective describes someone who is mighty, powerful, or forcible. In this context, it emphasizes the formidable power and entrenched authority of Satan, who is the "strong man" guarding his domain and possessions.
A primary verb meaning "to bind" in various applications, literally or figuratively, such as to tie up, restrain, or knit. Here, it denotes a decisive and complete act of subjugation, implying that the "strong man" (Satan) is rendered powerless and unable to resist the one who binds him. This is not a temporary restraint but a fundamental overcoming of his power.
From διά (dia, "through, apart") and ἁρπάζω (harpazō, "to seize"). This verb means "to seize asunder," "to plunder," or "to carry off by force." It conveys the idea of a forceful and legitimate reclaiming of possessions that were previously under the control of the "strong man." In the spiritual sense, it refers to the liberation of those held captive by Satan.
Verse Breakdown
"No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods"
This opening clause establishes the premise of the parable. It presents a logical impossibility: one cannot plunder the possessions ("goods") of a powerful individual ("strong man") who is guarding his own dwelling ("house") unless a prerequisite action is taken. This sets up the problem that Jesus, as the one casting out demons, must have overcome a greater power.
"except he will first bind the strong man;"
This is the critical condition. The only way to successfully plunder the strong man's house is to first overpower and restrain him. This "binding" implies a decisive act of conquest and subjugation. In the context of Jesus' argument, it signifies His prior and superior victory over Satan, enabling Him to liberate those under demonic influence.
"and then he will spoil his house."
This concluding clause describes the inevitable outcome once the strong man is bound. The "spoiling" of the house—the taking of his "goods"—represents the liberation of individuals from Satan's dominion. Jesus' exorcisms are presented as the direct evidence of this "spoiling," demonstrating that He has indeed bound the strong man and is now reclaiming what was once held captive.
Literary Devices
Mark 3:27 is a powerful example of a Parable, a short allegorical story designed to illustrate a moral or spiritual truth. Jesus uses this common literary form to explain His spiritual authority in a relatable way. Within the parable, there is extensive Symbolism: the "strong man" symbolizes Satan, the "house" represents Satan's domain or kingdom (the world under his influence), and his "goods" symbolize the people held captive by sin and demonic oppression. The act of "binding" the strong man is a Metaphor for Jesus' decisive victory and subjugation of Satan's power, while "spoiling his house" is a Metaphor for the liberation and redemption of humanity. The entire passage also carries a strong element of Irony, as the scribes accuse Jesus of being in league with Satan, yet Jesus' actions prove He is Satan's ultimate adversary, actively dismantling his kingdom.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Mark 3:27 is a foundational text for understanding the nature of spiritual warfare and Christ's supreme authority. It reveals that Jesus' ministry was not merely about teaching or healing, but about a direct, confrontational assault on the kingdom of darkness. The "binding" of the strong man signifies a decisive, pre-emptive victory over Satan, making all subsequent acts of deliverance possible. This is not a future event but a present reality inaugurated by Jesus' earthly ministry. His ability to cast out demons is irrefutable proof that a power greater than Satan has arrived, and that God's kingdom is actively breaking into the world, reclaiming what was lost. This truth provides immense comfort and assurance to believers, knowing that the "strong man" has been overcome by an even stronger one, Jesus Christ.
Reflection and Application
Mark 3:27 offers profound implications for the life of faith and ministry today. It assures us that Jesus has already achieved a decisive and foundational victory over Satan and his forces. The "strong man" has been bound, meaning his power is not absolute and his dominion has been decisively challenged and broken by Christ. This truth provides believers with an unshakeable foundation for confidence in the face of spiritual opposition. We are not fighting for victory, but from victory. Furthermore, this verse calls us to participate in the ongoing work of "spoiling his house." As followers of Christ, empowered by the Holy Spirit, we are called to be agents of liberation, bringing the light of the Gospel into dark places, witnessing to the truth, and seeing lives transformed from the dominion of darkness to the kingdom of God's beloved Son. This means actively engaging in evangelism, discipleship, and prayer, recognizing that every soul brought to Christ is a "good" reclaimed from the enemy's grasp. For those struggling with spiritual oppression or the lingering effects of sin, this verse offers immense hope: Jesus has the power to set the captives free, and His work continues through His Church.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who is the "strong man" in this parable?
The "strong man" in Mark 3:27 unequivocally represents Satan, the ruler of demons and the adversary of God. Jesus' entire argument in this passage, particularly His refutation of the scribes' accusation that He casts out demons by Beelzebub, points to Satan as the powerful entity whose kingdom Jesus is actively dismantling. The "house" of the strong man symbolizes Satan's domain or kingdom, which encompasses the world under his influence, and his "goods" represent the people held captive by sin, sickness, and demonic oppression, whom Jesus came to liberate.
How did Jesus "bind" the strong man?
Jesus "bound" the strong man (Satan) through His entire redemptive work, beginning with His incarnation, resisting temptation in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1-11), His authoritative teaching, and especially His power over demons and disease throughout His ministry. The ultimate "binding" occurred through His death on the cross, where He disarmed the spiritual rulers and authorities (Colossians 2:15), and His resurrection, which definitively demonstrated His victory over sin, death, and the devil. This binding is not a complete removal of Satan's influence from the world (which awaits a future, final judgment as described in Revelation 20:1-3), but a decisive subjugation of his power, rendering him unable to prevent Jesus from rescuing those he holds captive.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Mark 3:27 finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the reality that Jesus, through His life, death, and resurrection, has decisively conquered Satan and inaugurated the Kingdom of God. The "binding of the strong man" is not merely a metaphor for Jesus' power during His earthly ministry, but a prophetic declaration of His cosmic victory. On the cross, Jesus "disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him" (Colossians 2:15). His resurrection from the dead is the supreme proof that He has overcome the one who had the power of death—that is, the devil (Hebrews 2:14). By casting out demons, Jesus demonstrated that He was the "stronger one" who had come to plunder Satan's house, liberating humanity from the dominion of darkness and transferring them into His own kingdom (Colossians 1:13). This ongoing "spoiling" continues as the Gospel is proclaimed and souls are redeemed, testifying to the present reality of Christ's triumph and the ultimate defeat of the "prince of this world" (John 12:31), whose final, complete binding awaits the consummation of God's redemptive plan.