TRV
“The Beelzebul Accusation”· Mark 3:20–30
Translation
American Standard Version
And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
World English Bible Messianic
If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
Geneva Bible (1599)
For if a kingdome bee deuided against it selfe, that kingdome can not stand.
Young's Literal Translation
and if a kingdom against itself be divided, that kingdom cannot be made to stand;
See also
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 24,313 of 31,102 · 78.2%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Mark 3:22–30. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Passage under commentMark 3:22–30
22¶ And the scribes which came down from Jerusalem said, He hath Beelzebub, and by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils.
23And he called them unto him, and said unto them in parables, How can Satan cast out Satan?
24And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
25And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.
26And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end.
27No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house.
28Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme:
29But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:
30Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points
I.Here is, The impudent impious brand which the scribes fastened upon Christ's casting out devils, that they might evade and invalidate the conviction of it, and have a poor excuse for not yielding to it. These scribes came down from Jerusalem, Mar 3:22. It should seem they came this long journey on purpose to hinder the progress of the doctrine of Christ; such pains did they take to do mischief; and, coming from Jerusalem, where were the most polite and learned scribes, and where they had opportunity of consulting together against the Lord and his Anointed, they were in the greater capacity to do mischief; the reputation of scribes from Jerusalem would have an influence not only upon the country people, but upon the country scribes; they had never thought of this base suggestion concerning Christ's miracles till the scribes from Jerusalem put it into their heads. They could not deny but that he cast out devils, which plainly bespoke him sent of God; but they insinuated that he had Beelzebub on his side, was in league with him, and by the prince of the devils cast out devils. There is a trick in the case; Satan is not cast out, he only goes out by consent. There was nothing in the manner of Christ's casting out devils, that gave any cause to suspect this; he did it as one having authority; but so they will have it, who resolve not to believe him.
II.The rational answer which Christ gave to this objection, demonstrating the absurdity of it.
1.Satan is so subtle, that he will never voluntarily quit his possession; If Satan cast out Satan, his kingdom is divided against itself, and it cannot stand, Mar 3:23-26. He called them to him, as one desirous they should be convinced; he treated them with all the freedom, friendliness, and familiarity that could be; he vouchsafed to reason the case with them, that every mouth may be stopped. It was plain that the doctrine of Christ made war upon the devil's kingdom, and had a direct tendency to break his power, and crush his interest in the souls of men; and it was as plain that the casting of him out of the bodies of people confirmed that doctrine, and gave it the setting on; and therefore it cannot be imagined that he should come into such a design; every one knows that Satan is no fool, nor will act so directly against his own interest.
2.Christ is so wise, that, being engaged in war with him, he will attack his forces wherever he meets them, whether in the bodies or souls of people, Mar 3:27. It is plain, Christ's design is to enter into the strong man's house, to take possession of the interest he has in the world, and to spoil his goods, and convert them to his own service; and therefore it is natural to suppose that he will thus bind the strong man, will forbid him to speak when he would, and to stay where he would, and thus show that he has gained a victory over him.
III.The awful warning Christ gave them to take heed how they spoke such dangerous words as these; however they might make light of them, as only conjectures, and the language of free-thinking, if they persisted in it, it would be of fatal consequence to them; it would be found a sin against the last remedy, and consequently unpardonable; for what could be imagined possible to bring them to repentance for their sin in blaspheming Christ, who would set aside such a strong conviction with such a weak evasion? It is true, the gospel promiseth, because Christ hath purchased, forgiveness for the greatest sins and sinners, Mar 3:28. Many of those who reviled Christ on the cross (which was a blaspheming of the Son of man, aggravated to the highest degree), found mercy, and Christ himself prayed, Father, forgive them; but this was blaspheming the Holy Ghost, for it was by the Holy Spirit that he cast out devils, and they said, It was by the unclean spirit, Mar 3:30. By this method they would outface the conviction of all the gifts of the Holy Ghost after Christ's ascension, and defeat them all, after which there remained no more proof, and therefore they should never have forgiveness, but were liable to eternal damnation. They were in imminent danger of that everlasting punishment, from which there was no redemption, and in which there was no intermission, no remission.
Copy as
Historical interpretation
Eight Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Post-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
5006007008009001000110012001300
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Or this is meant; that he will not deserve to work out repentance, so as to be accepted, who, understanding who Christ was, declared that He was the prince of the devils.
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) The blasphemy of the Scribes having been detailed, our Lord shows that what they said was impossible, confirming His proof by an example. Wherefore it says, And having called them together unto him, he said unto them in parables. How can Satan cast out Satan? As if He had said, A kingdom divided against itself by civil war must be desolated, which is exemplified both in a house and in a city. Wherefore also if Satan's kingdom be divided against itself, so that Satan expels Satan from men, the desolation of the kingdom of the devils is at hand. But their kingdom consists in keeping men under their dominion. If therefore they are driven away from men, it amounts to nothing less than the dissolution of their kingdom. But if they still hold their power over men, it is manifest that the kingdom of evil is still standing, and Satan is not divided against himself.
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) He says indeed, that blasphemy concerning Himself was pardonable, because He then seemed to be a man despised and of the most lowly birth, but, that contumely against God has no remission. Now blasphemy against the Holy Ghost is against God, for the operation of the Holy Ghost is the kingdom of God; and for this reason, He says, that blasphemy against the Holy Ghost cannot be remitted. Instead, however, of what is here added, But will be in danger of eternal damnation, another Evangelist says, Neither in this world, nor in the world to come. By which is understood, the judgment which is according to the law, and that which is to come. For the law orders one who blasphemes God to be slain, and in the judgment of the second law he has no remission. nHowever, he who is baptized is taken out of this world; but the Jews were ignorant of the remission which takes place in baptism. He therefore who refers to the devil miracles, and the casting out of devils which belong to the Holy Ghost alone, has no room left him for remission of his blasphemy. Neither does it appear that such a blasphemy as this is remitted, since it is against the Holy Ghost. Wherefore he adds, explaining it, Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.
(in Marc. i. 17) The Lord has also bound the strong man, that is, the devil: which means, He has restrained him from seducing the elect, and entering into his house, the world; He has spoiled his house, and his goods, that is men, because He has snatched them from the snares of the devil, and has united them to His Church. Or, He has spoiled his house, because the four parts of the world, over which the old enemy had sway, He has distributed to the Apostles and their successors, that they may convert the people to the way of life. But the Lord shows that they committed a great sin, in crying out that that which they knew to be of God, was of the devil, when He subjoins, Verily I say unto you, All sins are forgiven, &c. All sins and blasphemies are not indeed remitted to all men, but to those who have gone through a repentance in this life sufficient for their sins; thus neither is Novatusm right, who denied that any pardon should be granted to penitents, who had lapsed in time of martyrdom; nor Origen, who asserts that after the general judgment, after the revolution of ages, all sinners will receive pardon for their sins, which error the following words of the Lord condemn, when He adds, But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, &c.
(ubi sup.) Neither however are those, who do not believe the Holy Spirit to be God, guilty of an unpardonable blasphemy, because they were persuaded to do this by human ignorance, not by devilish malice.
The meaning of the example is this: The devil is the strong man; his goods are the men into whom he is received; unless therefore a man first conquers the devil, how can he deprive him of his goods, that is, of the men whom he has possessed? So also I who spoil his goods, that is, free men from suffering by his possession, first spoil the devils and vanquish them, and am their enemy. How then can ye say that I have Beelzebub, and that being the friend of the devils, I cast them out?
We must however understand, that they will not obtain pardon unless they repent. But since it was at the flesh of Christ that they were offended, even though they did not repent, some excuse was allowed them, and they obtained some remission.
(non occ.) And because He has already shown by an example that a devil cannot cast out a devil, He shows how he can be expelled, saying, No man can enter into a strong man's house, &c.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Mark 3:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
In Mark 3:24, Jesus presents a foundational truth concerning the inherent instability of any entity that suffers from internal conflict. This statement is part of His masterful rebuttal to the scribes' absurd accusation that He casts out demons by the power of Beelzebul, the prince of demons. By asserting that a kingdom divided against itself cannot endure, Jesus logically exposes the self-defeating nature of their claim, thereby affirming the divine source of His power and the unified purpose of His ministry against the forces of evil.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated within a critical section of Mark's Gospel where Jesus's ministry is escalating, drawing both immense crowds and intense opposition. Immediately preceding this, Jesus's family attempts to restrain Him, believing Him to be out of His mind (Mark 3:20-21). This is followed by the arrival of scribes from Jerusalem, who, rather than acknowledging His miraculous works as divine, attribute His power over demons to Beelzebul (Mark 3:22). Jesus responds to this grave accusation with a series of logical parables, beginning with the universal principle articulated in Mark 3:24, which sets the stage for His subsequent arguments about a divided house and the binding of the strong man.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the 1st century Roman province of Judea, the concept of a "kingdom" (Greek: basileia) was deeply resonant. People lived under Roman imperial rule, yet harbored Messianic hopes for the restoration of an independent Jewish kingdom. The scribes, as religious authorities, were guardians of the Law and tradition, and their accusation against Jesus reflected a deep-seated fear and misunderstanding of His authority and origin. Their charge of demon possession (specifically by Beelzebul, often associated with Satan) was the most severe form of slander, aiming to discredit Jesus entirely and turn the crowds against Him. Jesus's response, therefore, was not merely a theological discourse but a strategic defense against a potentially fatal accusation, using common-sense logic that even His adversaries could not deny.
Key Themes
Mark 3:24 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Mark's Gospel. It highlights the nature of spiritual warfare, clearly delineating the opposing kingdoms of God and Satan. Jesus's argument posits that Satan's kingdom, like any other, would collapse if it were internally divided, making the scribes' accusation illogical and self-defeating. This sets the stage for understanding Jesus's true power as one who binds the strong man and plunders his house, demonstrating His authority over evil. Furthermore, the verse implicitly emphasizes the unity and coherence of the Kingdom of God, which Jesus is inaugurating and advancing. Unlike Satan's kingdom, which Jesus is actively dismantling, God's kingdom operates with divine unity and purpose, as seen in Jesus's consistent acts of healing and deliverance, which are signs of its arrival and power.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term denotes royalty, rule, or a realm. In this context, it refers to a sphere of dominion and authority, whether political (like a nation) or spiritual (like the realm of Satan or God). Jesus applies this universal principle to the spiritual conflict at hand, highlighting that any sphere of influence, if internally fractured, is inherently unstable.
This word means "to part," "to apportion," "to share," or "to disunite." The phrase "divided against itself" (Greek: merízō epí heautoû) powerfully emphasizes internal strife and fragmentation, where different components or factions within the same entity work in opposition to one another, leading to self-destruction.
This verb means "to stand" (transitively or intransitively), "to establish," or "to endure." When combined with the negative particle "cannot" (G3756, ou) and the verb "to be able" (G1410, dýnamai), the phrase "cannot stand" (οὐ δύναται στῆναι) conveys an absolute impossibility of endurance or stability. It signifies that internal division inevitably leads to collapse and failure.
Verse Breakdown
"And if a kingdom be divided against itself"
This opening clause establishes a hypothetical but universally accepted premise. Jesus uses the analogy of a "kingdom" (a realm of authority or dominion) to represent any organized entity. The critical condition is "divided against itself," which describes a state of internal conflict, disunity, or civil war where the constituent parts are at odds with each other rather than working cohesively. This division is self-inflicted and self-destructive.
"that kingdom cannot stand."
This second clause presents the inevitable consequence of the premise. The logical conclusion is that such an internally fractured entity is inherently unstable and lacks the capacity to endure or maintain its existence. The phrase "cannot stand" signifies an absolute impossibility of survival or stability, implying that collapse and ruin are its unavoidable destiny. Jesus applies this undeniable logic to expose the absurdity of the scribes' accusation that He, empowered by Satan, is casting out Satan's demons, as it would imply Satan's self-destruction.
Literary Devices
Jesus's statement in Mark 3:24 employs several effective literary devices. Primarily, it is an example of a Proverbial Statement or Aphorism, a concise, universally applicable truth that functions as a self-evident principle. The use of the Analogy of a "kingdom" allows Jesus to apply a familiar concept of political stability to the abstract realm of spiritual powers, making His argument accessible and compelling. The structure is also a form of If-Then Logic, where a condition (internal division) leads to an undeniable consequence (inability to stand). This logical structure highlights the Irony of the scribes' accusation; by attributing Jesus's exorcisms to Satan, they inadvertently suggest Satan is actively destroying his own kingdom, a notion Jesus exposes as illogical and self-defeating.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Mark 3:24 serves as a foundational theological statement about the nature of power, unity, and spiritual conflict. Jesus's argument isn't just a clever retort; it's a profound declaration that the forces of evil, though powerful, are ultimately subject to the same laws of internal coherence as any other kingdom. Satan's realm, by its very nature, seeks to oppose God and maintain its dominion; therefore, it cannot logically engage in self-destruction. Jesus's ability to cast out demons is thus presented as irrefutable proof that He is not allied with Satan but is, in fact, actively dismantling Satan's kingdom, demonstrating the superior, unified power of God. This verse underscores the fundamental opposition between the Kingdom of God and the kingdom of darkness, asserting God's ultimate victory through Christ.
Reflection and Application
The timeless principle articulated by Jesus in Mark 3:24 extends far beyond the immediate context of spiritual warfare to encompass all forms of human organization and relationships. Whether in families, communities, churches, or nations, internal division is a corrosive force that inevitably leads to weakness, instability, and eventual collapse. For believers, this verse serves as a powerful call to prioritize unity within the body of Christ. Just as Satan's kingdom, though evil, is united in its opposition to God, so too should followers of Christ strive for harmony, common purpose, and mutual support, actively resisting anything that fosters discord, factionalism, or a lack of shared vision. Our collective witness and effectiveness in the world are directly tied to our ability to live out the unity that Christ prayed for, demonstrating the coherence and power of God's kingdom in a divided world.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did the scribes accuse Jesus of being possessed by Beelzebul?
The scribes, religious authorities from Jerusalem, were deeply threatened by Jesus's growing popularity and miraculous power, especially His ability to cast out demons. They could not deny the reality of His exorcisms, but they refused to acknowledge that His power came from God, as that would validate His claims and challenge their authority. Therefore, in an act of extreme slander and desperation, they resorted to accusing Him of being in league with Beelzebul, often identified as a chief demon or Satan himself. This accusation was designed to discredit Jesus entirely and explain away His supernatural works as demonic rather than divine, thereby turning the crowds against Him. Jesus's response in Mark 3:23-27 masterfully exposes the logical fallacy of their charge.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Mark 3:24, while a universal truth, finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in Jesus's person and mission. The very fact that Jesus could cast out demons was proof that He was not allied with the kingdom of darkness but was actively invading and dismantling it. He is the "stronger man" who has come to bind the strong man (Satan) and plunder his house, liberating those held captive by sin and evil. His ministry of healing, deliverance, and teaching consistently demonstrated the inbreaking of God's kingdom, a kingdom of light, truth, and unity, fundamentally opposed to the division and darkness of Satan's realm. Through His atoning death and resurrection, Christ decisively triumphed over all spiritual powers and authorities, disarming them and making a public spectacle of them, ensuring that Satan's kingdom, already divided by Christ's presence, would ultimately fall. Thus, Jesus's victory is the ultimate demonstration that the kingdom of God, united in purpose through Christ, will stand eternally, while the kingdom of darkness, divided and defeated, cannot.