See on the biblical-era map
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Joshua 13:7–33. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here we have, I. Orders given to Joshua to assign to each tribe its portion of this land, including that which was yet unsubdued, which must be brought into the lot, in a believing confidence that it should be conquered when Israel was multiplied so as to have occasion for it (Jos 13:7): Now divide this land. Joshua thought all must be conquered before any must be divided. "No," said, God, "there is as much conquered as will serve your turn for the present; divide this, and make your best of it, and wait for the remainder hereafter." Note, We must take the comfort of what we have, though we cannot compass all we would have. Observe,
1.The land must be divided among the several tribes, and they must not always live in common, as now they did. Which way soever a just property is acquired, it is the will of that God who has given the earth to the children of men that there should be such a thing, and that every man should know his own, and not invade that which is another's. The world must be governed, not by force, but right, by the law of equity, not of arms.
2.That it must be divided for an inheritance, though they got it by conquest.
(1.)The promise of it came to them as an inheritance from their fathers; the land of promise pertained to the children of promise, who were thus beloved for their fathers' sakes, and in performance of the covenant with them.
(2.)The possession of it was to be transmitted by them, as an inheritance to their children. Frequently, what is got by force is soon lost again; but Israel, having an incontestable title to this land by the divine grant, might see it hereby secured as an inheritance to their seed after them, and that God kept this mercy for thousands.
3.That Joshua must not divide it by his own will. Though he was a very wise, just, and good man, it must not be left to him to give what he pleased to each tribe; but he must do it by lot, which referred the matter wholly to God, and to his determination, for he it is that appoints the bounds of our habitation, and every man's judgment must proceed from him. But Joshua must preside in this affair, must manage this solemn appeal to Providence, and see that the lot was drawn fairly and without fraud, and that every tribe did acquiesce in it. The lot indeed causeth contention to cease, Pro 18:18. But, if upon this lot any controversy should arise, Joshua by his wisdom and authority must determine it, and prevent any ill consequences of it. Joshua must have the honour of dividing the land,
(1.)Because he had undergone the fatigue of conquering it: and when, through his hand, each tribe received its allotment, they would thereby be made the more sensible of their obligations to him. And what a pleasure must it needs be to a man of such a public spirit as Joshua was to see the people that were so dear to him eating of the labour of his hands!
(2.)That he might be herein a type of Christ, who has not only conquered for us the gates of hell, but has opened to us the gates of heaven, and, having purchased the eternal inheritance for all believers, will in due time put them all in possession of it.
II.An account is here given of the distribution of the land on the other side Jordan among the Reubenites, and Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh. Observe,
1.How this account is introduced. It comes in,
(1.)As the reason why this land within Jordan must be divided only to the nine tribes and a half, because the other two and a half were already provided for.
(2.)As a pattern to Joshua in the work he had now to do. He had seen Moses distribute that land, which would give him some aid in distributing this, and thence he might take his measure; only this was to be done by lot, but it should seem Moses did that himself, according to the wisdom given unto him.
(3.)As an inducement to Joshua to hasten the dividing of this land, that the nine tribes and a half might not be kept any longer than was necessary out of their possession, since their brethren of the two tribes and a half were so well settled in theirs; and God their common Father would not have such a difference made between his children.
2.The particulars of this account.
(1.)Here is a general description of the country that was given to the two tribes and a half, which Moses gave them, even as Moses gave them, Jos 13:8. The repetition implies a ratification of the grant by Joshua. Moses settled this matter, and, as Moses settled it, so shall it rest; Joshua will not, under any pretence whatsoever, go about to alter it. And a reason is intimated why he would not, because Moses was the servant of the Lord, and acted in this matter by secret direction from him and was faithful as a servant. Here we have,
[1.]The fixing of the boundaries of this country, by which they were divided from the neighbouring nations, Jos 13:9, etc. Israel must know their own and keep to it, and may not, under pretence of their being God's peculiar people, encroach upon their neighbours, and invade their rights and properties, to which they had a good and firm title by providence, though not, as Israel, a title by promise.
[2.]An exception of one part of this country from Israel's possession, though it was in their grant, namely, the Geshurites and the Maachathites, Jos 13:13. They had not leisure to reduce all the remote and obscure corners of the country in Moses's time, and afterwards they had no mind to it, being easy with what they had. Thus those who are not straitened in God's promises are yet straitened in their own faith, and prayers, and endeavours.
(2.)A very particular account of the inheritances of these two tribes and a half, how they were separated from each other, and what cites, with the towns, villages, and fields, commonly known and reputed to be appurtenances to them, belonged to each tribe. This is very fully and exactly set down in order that posterity might, in reading this history, be the more affected with the goodness of God to their ancestors, when they found what a large and fruitful country, and what abundance of great and famous cities, he put them in possession of (God's grants look best when we descend to the particulars); and also that the limits of every tribe being punctually set down in this authentic record disputes might be prevented, and such contests between the tribes as commonly happen where boundaries have not been adjusted nor this matter brought to a certainty. And we have reason to think that the register here prescribed and published of the lot of each tribe was of great use to Israel in after-ages, was often appealed to, and always acquiesced in, for the determining of meum and tuum - mine and thine.
[1.]We have here the lot of the tribe of Reuben, Jacob's first-born, who, though he had lost the dignity and power which pertained to the birthright, yet, it seems, had the advantage of being first served. Perhaps those of that tribe had an eye to this in desiring to be seated on that side Jordan, that, since they could not expect the benefit of the best lot, they might have the credit of the first. Observe, First, In the account of the lot of this tribe mention is made of the slaughter, 1. Of Sihon, king of the Amorites, who reigned in this country, and might have kept it and his life if he would have been neighbourly, and have suffered Israel to pass through his territories, but, by attempting to oppose them, justly brought ruin upon himself, Num 21:21, etc. 2. Of the princes of Midian, who were slain afterwards in another war (Num 31:8), and yet are here called dukes of Sihon, and are said to be smitten with him, because they were either tributaries to him, or, in his opposition to Israel, confederates with him, and hearty in his interests, and his fall made way for theirs not long after. 3. Of Balaam particularly, that would, if he could, have cursed Israel, and was soon after recompensed according to the wickedness of his endeavour (Psa 28:4), for he fell with those that set him on. This was recorded before (Num 31:8), and is here repeated, because the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel was the turning of that curse into a blessing, and was such an instance of the power and goodness of God as was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance. See Mic 6:5. Secondly, Within the lot of this tribe was that Mount Pisgah from the top of which Moses took his view of the earthly Canaan and his flight to the heavenly. And not far off thence Elijah was when he was fetched up to heaven in a chariot of fire. The separation of this tribe from the rest, by the river Jordan, was that which Deborah lamented; and the preference they gave to their private interests above the public was what she censured, Jdg 5:15, Jdg 5:16. In this tribe lay Heshbon and Sibmah, famed for their fruitful fields and vineyards. See Isa 16:8, Isa 16:9; Jer 48:32. This tribe, with that of Gad, was sorely shaken by Hazael king of Syria (Kg2 10:33), and afterwards dislodged and carried into captivity, twenty years before the general captivity of the ten tribes by the king of Assyria, Ch1 5:26.
[2.]The lot of the tribe of Gad, Jos 13:24-28. This lay north of Reuben's lot; the country of Gilead lay in this tribe, so famous for its balm that it is thought strange indeed if there be no balm in Gilead, and the cities of Jabesh-Gilead and Ramoth-Gilead which we often read of in scripture. Succoth and Penuel, which we read of in the story of Gideon, were in this tribe; and that forest which is called the wood of Ephraim (from the slaughter Jephthah made there of the Ephraimites), in which Absalom's rebellious army was beaten, while his father David lay at Mahanaim, one of the frontier-cities of this tribe, Jos 13:26. Sharon, famous for roses, was in this tribe. And within the limits of this tribe lived those Gadarenes that loved their swine better than their Saviour, fitter to be called Girgashites than Israelites.
[3.]The lot of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Jos 13:29-31. Bashan, the kingdom of Og, was in this allotment, famous for the best timber, witness the oaks of Bashan - and the best breed of cattle, witness the bulls and rams of Bashan. This tribe lay north of Gad, reached to Mount Hermon, and had in it part of Gilead. Mispeh was in this half-tribe, and Jephthah was one of its ornaments; so was Elijah, for in this tribe was Thisbe, whence he is called the Tishbite; and Jair was another. In the edge of the tribe stood Chorazin, honoured with Christ's wondrous works, but ruined by his righteous woe for not improving them.
[4.]Twice in this chapter it is taken notice of that to the tribe of Levi Moses gave no inheritance (Jos 13:14, Jos 13:33), for so God had appointed, Num 18:20. If they had been appointed to a lot entire by themselves, Moses would have served them first, not because it was his own tribe, but because it was God's; but they must be provided for in another manner; their habitations must be scattered in all the tribes, and their maintenance brought out of all the tribes, and God himself was the portion both of their inheritance and of their cup, Deu 10:9; Deu 18:2.
Continue studying Joshua 13:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.



Summary
Joshua 13:27 meticulously details a specific segment of the land east of the Jordan River, enumerating key cities and geographical landmarks within the former domain of Sihon, king of Heshbon. This verse, embedded within the broader account of Israel's tribal inheritances, powerfully underscores God's unwavering faithfulness and precise fulfillment of His covenant promises, providing a tangible inheritance in territories previously secured by Moses. It highlights the divine order and specificity inherent in the allocation of tribal boundaries, particularly for the Transjordanian tribes, ensuring that every detail of Israel's promised possession was accounted for and formally recorded.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is strategically placed within Joshua 13, which initiates the comprehensive section (chapters 13-19) detailing the division of the Promised Land among the twelve tribes of Israel. Despite Joshua's advanced age and the fact that significant portions of the land remained unconquered, God explicitly commands him to proceed with the distribution, emphasizing that the land is already Israel's by divine decree and covenant promise, as stated in Joshua 13:1. Joshua 13:27 specifically contributes to the precise description of the territory allotted to the tribe of Gad, or potentially Reuben, given the intricate and sometimes overlapping nature of the boundary descriptions for the Transjordanian tribes. The meticulous enumeration of cities and geographical features serves to formally record and validate the tribal inheritances, reinforcing the divine authority behind the distribution.
Historical & Cultural Context
The territory described in Joshua 13:27, situated east of the Jordan River, was not part of the initial conquest under Joshua but had been secured by Moses before his death. This region, encompassing the fertile Jordan Valley and the kingdom of Sihon, was acquired after Israel's decisive victories against the Amorite King Sihon of Heshbon and King Og of Bashan, events extensively recounted in Numbers 21:21-35 and Deuteronomy 2:26-37. The defeat of Sihon was a pivotal moment, demonstrating God's power to clear the way for His people and providing a significant portion of land for the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and half of Manasseh, who chose to settle there. Culturally, precise land boundaries were of paramount importance for establishing tribal identity, ensuring economic stability, and preventing future disputes, reflecting the deep significance of land ownership in ancient Near Eastern societies.
Key Themes
Joshua 13:27 powerfully reinforces several key themes woven throughout the Book of Joshua and the broader Pentateuchal narrative. Primarily, it underscores Divine Faithfulness and Provision, demonstrating God's meticulous and unwavering fulfillment of His covenant promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to give their descendants the land, as first articulated in Genesis 12:7. The detailed enumeration of cities and boundaries highlights God's commitment to every minute aspect of His promise. Secondly, the verse emphasizes Order and Specificity, showcasing the divine precision in the distribution of the land. Each tribe received a clearly defined portion, a testament to God's orderly nature and His desire to prevent future territorial conflicts among His people. Finally, it serves as a reminder of Conquest and Inheritance, illustrating that this land was not acquired through human might alone but through divine intervention and the preceding conquests, which paved the way for Israel's settlement and secure inheritance.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This refers to the Amorite king of Heshbon, whose formidable kingdom was located east of the Jordan River. His refusal to allow Israel peaceful passage led to a decisive battle where Israel, empowered by God, utterly defeated him and took possession of his land. His mention here underscores the foundational historical context of the conquest and the divine provision of this specific territory as a direct result of God's intervention.
The capital city of King Sihon, strategically situated east of the Jordan. Its capture was a major victory for Israel, signifying the downfall of a formidable regional power and the securement of a significant portion of land. The phrase "the rest of the kingdom of Sihon king of Heshbon" indicates that the cities listed in the verse were part of the broader territory that had been under Sihon's dominion, reinforcing the continuity of God's redemptive plan through conquest and inheritance.
This is the ancient name for what is now known as the Sea of Galilee, also referred to as Lake Gennesaret or Lake Tiberias in the New Testament. The name "Chinnereth" is thought to derive from the Hebrew word for a lyre or harp (kinnor), possibly due to its distinctive harp-like shape. Its mention here establishes the northernmost boundary of the described territory, providing a clear and identifiable geographical marker for the full extent of the land allotted.
Verse Breakdown
"And in the valley, Betharam, and Bethnimrah, and Succoth, and Zaphon"
This clause identifies specific cities located within the fertile Jordan Valley, east of the Jordan River. These cities were integral parts of the territory allotted to the tribe of Gad (or Reuben, depending on the precise boundary interpretation). Betharam is likely Beth-haram, and Bethnimrah was known for its abundant water. Succoth is historically significant, mentioned in connection with Jacob's journey and Gideon's pursuit of the Midianites. Zaphon was another key city in the region. The listing emphasizes the concrete, tangible nature of the land inheritance, making the divine promise a physical reality.
"the rest of the kingdom of Sihon king of Heshbon"
This phrase clarifies that the described cities and territory constituted the remaining portion of the Amorite kingdom that Israel had conquered under Moses. It serves as a crucial historical anchor, connecting the current land distribution to the earlier, divinely-empowered victories and reinforcing the idea that this inheritance was a direct result of God's prior intervention and provision, not merely a new acquisition.
"Jordan and [his] border, [even] unto the edge of the sea of Chinnereth on the other side Jordan eastward"
This clause precisely defines the geographical boundaries of the described land. The Jordan River serves as the western border, a prominent natural landmark and a consistent reference point in biblical geography. The phrase "on the other side Jordan eastward" specifies its location relative to the main body of Israel's land west of the Jordan. The northern extent of this territory reaches "unto the edge of the sea of Chinnereth," providing a clear and unmistakable northern boundary for the allotted land, demonstrating divine order and foresight.
Literary Devices
Joshua 13:27 primarily employs Enumeration or Cataloging, a common and significant literary device in biblical texts, particularly in legal, historical, and genealogical sections. This involves the detailed listing of names, places, or items to convey precision, thoroughness, and authenticity. Here, the specific naming of Betharam, Bethnimrah, Succoth, and Zaphon, along with the prominent geographical markers of the Jordan River and the Sea of Chinnereth, creates a profound sense of meticulous detail. This Geographical Precision is not merely for informational purposes; it serves a deep theological function. It underscores God's absolute faithfulness in fulfilling His promises down to the smallest detail, demonstrating that the land was indeed a real, tangible inheritance, precisely as promised. The specificity also reinforces the Divine Order in the distribution, ensuring clarity, preventing future disputes among the tribes, and solidifying the legitimacy of Israel's claim to the land. The very act of naming these places validates the divine grant and the undeniable reality of Israel's possession.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Joshua 13:27, though seemingly a dry geographical description, is profoundly theological, serving as a powerful testament to God's unwavering faithfulness and meticulous care for His covenant people. The precise delineation of boundaries and the naming of specific cities underscore that God's promises are not vague generalities but concrete realities, fulfilled with astonishing detail. Just as God meticulously ensured that every inch of the promised land was accounted for and allotted, He is faithful to every promise He makes, whether physical or spiritual. This passage reminds us that God's sovereignty extends to the smallest details of His plans, ensuring that His purposes are perfectly executed. It speaks to the divine order that undergirds creation and redemption, providing a secure foundation for Israel's identity and future as the inheritors of God's promises.
Reflection and Application
The detailed geographical descriptions in Joshua 13:27 might initially appear remote from our daily lives, yet they offer profound spiritual lessons for contemporary believers. This verse serves as a powerful reminder of God's meticulous faithfulness. Just as He precisely fulfilled His ancient promises to Israel concerning the land, we can trust in His unwavering commitment to His promises to us, whether they pertain to salvation, guidance, provision, or eternal life. The divine precision in land distribution encourages us to recognize that God is intimately involved in the details of our lives; nothing is too small for His attention or too complex for His perfect plan. We are called to "possess" our spiritual inheritance in Christ, living within the boundaries of His grace, truth, and purpose for our lives. This means actively trusting His Word, walking in obedience, and embracing the boundless spiritual blessings He has already secured for us through His Son.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is the significance of Sihon, king of Heshbon, being mentioned here?
The mention of Sihon, king of Heshbon, is highly significant because it grounds the land allotment in a specific, pivotal historical event. This territory was part of the Amorite kingdom that Israel had decisively conquered under Moses before even entering Canaan. Sihon's defeat, vividly described in Numbers 21:21-35, was a major victory that powerfully demonstrated God's power and faithfulness to fight for His people. By including "the rest of the kingdom of Sihon king of Heshbon," the text highlights that this inheritance was not merely a new acquisition but the direct fulfillment of a prior divine promise and a tangible result of God's earlier intervention on Israel's behalf, providing a historical and theological anchor for the land's legitimacy.
Why is the Sea of Chinnereth mentioned, and what is its modern name?
The Sea of Chinnereth is mentioned as a crucial geographical marker, defining the northern boundary of the territory described in Joshua 13:27. Its inclusion provides a clear and identifiable limit for the allotted land, demonstrating the precision with which God's promises were fulfilled. Today, the Sea of Chinnereth is widely known as the Sea of Galilee, also frequently referred to as Lake Gennesaret or Lake Tiberias in the New Testament. It is a highly significant body of water, central to many of Jesus's miracles and teachings, as seen in passages like Matthew 4:18 where He calls His first disciples. The ancient name "Chinnereth" is believed to be derived from the Hebrew word for a lyre or harp (kinnor), possibly due to the lake's distinctive, curved shape.
How does this detailed geographical description relate to God's character?
This detailed geographical description profoundly reveals several key aspects of God's character. Firstly, it underscores His faithfulness to His covenant promises. The meticulous accounting of every city and boundary demonstrates that God fulfills His word with precision, integrity, and unwavering commitment, leaving no detail overlooked. Secondly, it highlights His orderliness and sovereignty. The systematic division of the land reflects a divine plan that is perfectly ordered and leaves nothing to chance, ensuring clarity and preventing chaos or disputes among the tribes. Lastly, it speaks to God's attentiveness to detail and His generosity. He not only promised a land but ensured its specific and exact allocation, demonstrating His profound care for His people's inheritance and their holistic well-being.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Joshua 13:27 meticulously details a physical land inheritance for ancient Israel, it powerfully foreshadows the spiritual inheritance believers receive in Christ, revealing a deeper redemptive purpose. The precise and faithful division of the land for Israel points to God's ultimate and perfect fulfillment of all His promises, culminating in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Just as the land provided rest, security, and identity for Israel, Christ is our ultimate rest and security, the true "land" of promise. In Him, we receive "every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places," as profoundly described in Ephesians 1:3. Our inheritance is not a geographical plot but participation in the very life and eternal kingdom of God, secured by Christ's atoning sacrifice and triumphant resurrection. He is the ultimate fulfillment of the covenant, establishing a new and better covenant where believers, through faith, inherit eternal life and become co-heirs with Him, as Romans 8:17 declares. The boundaries of this new inheritance are not physical rivers or seas, but the boundless grace, truth, and eternal life found exclusively in the person of Jesus, leading us to a heavenly city and a new creation, as gloriously glimpsed in Revelation 21:1.