See on the biblical-era map
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Joshua 13:7–33. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here we have, I. Orders given to Joshua to assign to each tribe its portion of this land, including that which was yet unsubdued, which must be brought into the lot, in a believing confidence that it should be conquered when Israel was multiplied so as to have occasion for it (Jos 13:7): Now divide this land. Joshua thought all must be conquered before any must be divided. "No," said, God, "there is as much conquered as will serve your turn for the present; divide this, and make your best of it, and wait for the remainder hereafter." Note, We must take the comfort of what we have, though we cannot compass all we would have. Observe,
1.The land must be divided among the several tribes, and they must not always live in common, as now they did. Which way soever a just property is acquired, it is the will of that God who has given the earth to the children of men that there should be such a thing, and that every man should know his own, and not invade that which is another's. The world must be governed, not by force, but right, by the law of equity, not of arms.
2.That it must be divided for an inheritance, though they got it by conquest.
(1.)The promise of it came to them as an inheritance from their fathers; the land of promise pertained to the children of promise, who were thus beloved for their fathers' sakes, and in performance of the covenant with them.
(2.)The possession of it was to be transmitted by them, as an inheritance to their children. Frequently, what is got by force is soon lost again; but Israel, having an incontestable title to this land by the divine grant, might see it hereby secured as an inheritance to their seed after them, and that God kept this mercy for thousands.
3.That Joshua must not divide it by his own will. Though he was a very wise, just, and good man, it must not be left to him to give what he pleased to each tribe; but he must do it by lot, which referred the matter wholly to God, and to his determination, for he it is that appoints the bounds of our habitation, and every man's judgment must proceed from him. But Joshua must preside in this affair, must manage this solemn appeal to Providence, and see that the lot was drawn fairly and without fraud, and that every tribe did acquiesce in it. The lot indeed causeth contention to cease, Pro 18:18. But, if upon this lot any controversy should arise, Joshua by his wisdom and authority must determine it, and prevent any ill consequences of it. Joshua must have the honour of dividing the land,
(1.)Because he had undergone the fatigue of conquering it: and when, through his hand, each tribe received its allotment, they would thereby be made the more sensible of their obligations to him. And what a pleasure must it needs be to a man of such a public spirit as Joshua was to see the people that were so dear to him eating of the labour of his hands!
(2.)That he might be herein a type of Christ, who has not only conquered for us the gates of hell, but has opened to us the gates of heaven, and, having purchased the eternal inheritance for all believers, will in due time put them all in possession of it.
II.An account is here given of the distribution of the land on the other side Jordan among the Reubenites, and Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh. Observe,
1.How this account is introduced. It comes in,
(1.)As the reason why this land within Jordan must be divided only to the nine tribes and a half, because the other two and a half were already provided for.
(2.)As a pattern to Joshua in the work he had now to do. He had seen Moses distribute that land, which would give him some aid in distributing this, and thence he might take his measure; only this was to be done by lot, but it should seem Moses did that himself, according to the wisdom given unto him.
(3.)As an inducement to Joshua to hasten the dividing of this land, that the nine tribes and a half might not be kept any longer than was necessary out of their possession, since their brethren of the two tribes and a half were so well settled in theirs; and God their common Father would not have such a difference made between his children.
2.The particulars of this account.
(1.)Here is a general description of the country that was given to the two tribes and a half, which Moses gave them, even as Moses gave them, Jos 13:8. The repetition implies a ratification of the grant by Joshua. Moses settled this matter, and, as Moses settled it, so shall it rest; Joshua will not, under any pretence whatsoever, go about to alter it. And a reason is intimated why he would not, because Moses was the servant of the Lord, and acted in this matter by secret direction from him and was faithful as a servant. Here we have,
[1.]The fixing of the boundaries of this country, by which they were divided from the neighbouring nations, Jos 13:9, etc. Israel must know their own and keep to it, and may not, under pretence of their being God's peculiar people, encroach upon their neighbours, and invade their rights and properties, to which they had a good and firm title by providence, though not, as Israel, a title by promise.
[2.]An exception of one part of this country from Israel's possession, though it was in their grant, namely, the Geshurites and the Maachathites, Jos 13:13. They had not leisure to reduce all the remote and obscure corners of the country in Moses's time, and afterwards they had no mind to it, being easy with what they had. Thus those who are not straitened in God's promises are yet straitened in their own faith, and prayers, and endeavours.
(2.)A very particular account of the inheritances of these two tribes and a half, how they were separated from each other, and what cites, with the towns, villages, and fields, commonly known and reputed to be appurtenances to them, belonged to each tribe. This is very fully and exactly set down in order that posterity might, in reading this history, be the more affected with the goodness of God to their ancestors, when they found what a large and fruitful country, and what abundance of great and famous cities, he put them in possession of (God's grants look best when we descend to the particulars); and also that the limits of every tribe being punctually set down in this authentic record disputes might be prevented, and such contests between the tribes as commonly happen where boundaries have not been adjusted nor this matter brought to a certainty. And we have reason to think that the register here prescribed and published of the lot of each tribe was of great use to Israel in after-ages, was often appealed to, and always acquiesced in, for the determining of meum and tuum - mine and thine.
[1.]We have here the lot of the tribe of Reuben, Jacob's first-born, who, though he had lost the dignity and power which pertained to the birthright, yet, it seems, had the advantage of being first served. Perhaps those of that tribe had an eye to this in desiring to be seated on that side Jordan, that, since they could not expect the benefit of the best lot, they might have the credit of the first. Observe, First, In the account of the lot of this tribe mention is made of the slaughter, 1. Of Sihon, king of the Amorites, who reigned in this country, and might have kept it and his life if he would have been neighbourly, and have suffered Israel to pass through his territories, but, by attempting to oppose them, justly brought ruin upon himself, Num 21:21, etc. 2. Of the princes of Midian, who were slain afterwards in another war (Num 31:8), and yet are here called dukes of Sihon, and are said to be smitten with him, because they were either tributaries to him, or, in his opposition to Israel, confederates with him, and hearty in his interests, and his fall made way for theirs not long after. 3. Of Balaam particularly, that would, if he could, have cursed Israel, and was soon after recompensed according to the wickedness of his endeavour (Psa 28:4), for he fell with those that set him on. This was recorded before (Num 31:8), and is here repeated, because the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel was the turning of that curse into a blessing, and was such an instance of the power and goodness of God as was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance. See Mic 6:5. Secondly, Within the lot of this tribe was that Mount Pisgah from the top of which Moses took his view of the earthly Canaan and his flight to the heavenly. And not far off thence Elijah was when he was fetched up to heaven in a chariot of fire. The separation of this tribe from the rest, by the river Jordan, was that which Deborah lamented; and the preference they gave to their private interests above the public was what she censured, Jdg 5:15, Jdg 5:16. In this tribe lay Heshbon and Sibmah, famed for their fruitful fields and vineyards. See Isa 16:8, Isa 16:9; Jer 48:32. This tribe, with that of Gad, was sorely shaken by Hazael king of Syria (Kg2 10:33), and afterwards dislodged and carried into captivity, twenty years before the general captivity of the ten tribes by the king of Assyria, Ch1 5:26.
[2.]The lot of the tribe of Gad, Jos 13:24-28. This lay north of Reuben's lot; the country of Gilead lay in this tribe, so famous for its balm that it is thought strange indeed if there be no balm in Gilead, and the cities of Jabesh-Gilead and Ramoth-Gilead which we often read of in scripture. Succoth and Penuel, which we read of in the story of Gideon, were in this tribe; and that forest which is called the wood of Ephraim (from the slaughter Jephthah made there of the Ephraimites), in which Absalom's rebellious army was beaten, while his father David lay at Mahanaim, one of the frontier-cities of this tribe, Jos 13:26. Sharon, famous for roses, was in this tribe. And within the limits of this tribe lived those Gadarenes that loved their swine better than their Saviour, fitter to be called Girgashites than Israelites.
[3.]The lot of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Jos 13:29-31. Bashan, the kingdom of Og, was in this allotment, famous for the best timber, witness the oaks of Bashan - and the best breed of cattle, witness the bulls and rams of Bashan. This tribe lay north of Gad, reached to Mount Hermon, and had in it part of Gilead. Mispeh was in this half-tribe, and Jephthah was one of its ornaments; so was Elijah, for in this tribe was Thisbe, whence he is called the Tishbite; and Jair was another. In the edge of the tribe stood Chorazin, honoured with Christ's wondrous works, but ruined by his righteous woe for not improving them.
[4.]Twice in this chapter it is taken notice of that to the tribe of Levi Moses gave no inheritance (Jos 13:14, Jos 13:33), for so God had appointed, Num 18:20. If they had been appointed to a lot entire by themselves, Moses would have served them first, not because it was his own tribe, but because it was God's; but they must be provided for in another manner; their habitations must be scattered in all the tribes, and their maintenance brought out of all the tribes, and God himself was the portion both of their inheritance and of their cup, Deu 10:9; Deu 18:2.
Continue studying Joshua 13:28 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.



Summary
Joshua 13:28 serves as a concise declaration of the completed land allotment for the tribe of Gad, meticulously detailing their specific portion of the Promised Land east of the Jordan River. This verse underscores the precise fulfillment of God's covenant promises to Israel, affirming Gad's established territory, encompassing their cities and villages, as an integral part of the divine distribution plan for the twelve tribes.
Context
Literary Context
Joshua chapter 13 marks a pivotal transition in the book, shifting from the narrative of conquest to the meticulous, divinely ordained process of land distribution among the Israelite tribes. Although significant portions of Canaan remained unconquered, God commanded Joshua to begin the allocation, demonstrating His faithfulness to His covenant promises. Verses 13:8-12 provide a general overview of the territory east of the Jordan River, which was previously allotted by Moses to the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh. Joshua 13:28 specifically concludes the detailed geographical description of Gad's inheritance, following the listing of their boundaries and key cities in the preceding verses (Joshua 13:24-27). It serves as a final, definitive statement regarding their established portion within the larger mosaic of tribal inheritances.
Historical & Cultural Context
The allocation of land was central to ancient Israelite identity and their understanding of God's covenant. The tribes of Reuben and Gad, along with the half-tribe of Manasseh, had made a specific request to Moses to settle in the fertile Transjordan region before the conquest of Canaan proper, as recorded in Numbers 32. Moses granted their request on the condition that their fighting men would cross the Jordan and assist the other tribes in conquering the western territories, a condition they faithfully fulfilled (Joshua 1:12-18). This historical agreement explains why their inheritance is detailed first in Joshua 13 and why their portion is distinct from the tribes settling west of the Jordan. Culturally, land was not merely property but an "inheritance" (Hebrew: nachalah), a divinely given, inalienable possession that secured tribal identity, economic stability, and a permanent place within the covenant community.
Key Themes
Joshua 13:28 powerfully reinforces several overarching themes within the book of Joshua and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost is Divine Faithfulness and Fulfillment, as God meticulously delivers on His ancient promise to Abraham to give his descendants the land (Genesis 12:7). The detailed allocation, down to cities and villages, demonstrates God's precision and commitment. Another key theme is Order and Organization, highlighting God as a God of structure, not chaos. The systematic division of land prevents disputes and establishes the framework for Israel's national life. Finally, the concept of Tribal Identity and Inheritance is paramount. Each tribe received a distinct nachalah, a permanent, divinely allotted possession that defined their place, secured their future, and underscored their unique contribution to the nation of Israel, even for those, like Gad, who settled on the eastern frontier.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term is central to the Old Testament concept of land. It signifies more than mere property; it is a divinely allotted possession, a permanent ancestral holding that is passed down through generations. It emphasizes God's gift and the fulfillment of His covenant promises, securing a people's place, identity, and future within the land. For Gad, this nachălâh was their specific, divinely ordained share of the Promised Land, distinct and inalienable.
This word refers to a clan or extended family unit, a subdivision of a tribe. The phrase "after their families" highlights the meticulous and equitable nature of the land distribution. The inheritance was not just for the tribe as a whole, but was subdivided and allocated to the various family units within Gad, ensuring that each household had a stake and a place within the covenant community. This detail underscores the precision of God's provision and the foundational importance of the family unit in Israelite society.
Verse Breakdown
"This [is] the inheritance of the children of Gad"
This opening phrase serves as a definitive declaration, marking the culmination of the detailed description of Gad's allotted territory. It emphasizes that this portion of land, specifically on the eastern side of the Jordan, is their permanent, divinely given possession, a fulfillment of the covenant God made with Israel. The term "inheritance" (Hebrew: nachalah) underscores its sacred and inalienable nature.
"after their families"
This clause highlights the meticulous and organized nature of the land distribution. The inheritance was not merely given to the tribe of Gad as a collective, but was further subdivided and allocated to the various clans and family units within the tribe. This ensured equity, established clear boundaries for each household, and reinforced the importance of familial lineage and identity within the larger tribal structure.
"the cities, and their villages"
This specifies the components of Gad's inheritance, encompassing both the fortified urban centers and the smaller, surrounding agricultural settlements. This detail paints a comprehensive picture of the territory, indicating that the inheritance included not just open land but also established communities, infrastructure, and the means for sustained life and prosperity. It signifies a complete and viable portion of the Promised Land.
Literary Devices
The verse primarily functions as a Declarative Statement, serving as a conclusive summary of the preceding detailed geographical descriptions of Gad's territory. Its straightforward, factual tone emphasizes the finality and authority of the land distribution. The use of Enumeration is evident in the listing of "the cities, and their villages," which provides a comprehensive picture of the inheritance, highlighting the meticulousness of the divine allocation. While subtle in this specific verse, the broader context of Joshua 13 employs Repetition of the term "inheritance" (Hebrew: nachalah) and similar declarative statements for each tribe, reinforcing the overarching theme of God's faithfulness in fulfilling His land promises to all of Israel.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Joshua 13:28, though seemingly a mere administrative detail, carries profound theological weight. It stands as a testament to God's unwavering faithfulness and His meticulous fulfillment of covenant promises. The land, as Israel's inheritance, was the tangible expression of God's commitment to His people, a place where they could live in covenant relationship with Him, establish their identity, and worship Him. This verse, like all the land allotments, illustrates that God is a God of order, who provides for His people with precision and care, ensuring that each family and tribe has its designated place and provision. It speaks to the divine sovereignty over all creation and the meticulous nature of His redemptive plan, which extends even to geographical boundaries.
Reflection and Application
While the physical inheritance of land was central to ancient Israel, Joshua 13:28 offers timeless principles for contemporary believers. Just as God meticulously provided a specific, secure inheritance for the tribe of Gad, so too does He provide for us, both materially and spiritually. This verse reminds us that God is a God of order, who has a plan for our lives, and that His promises are trustworthy and will be fulfilled in His perfect timing and manner. It encourages us to trust in His provision, to find our identity and security not in what we possess, but in our relationship with Him, and to understand that our "inheritance" in Christ is far more enduring and glorious than any earthly possession. We are called to live faithfully within the "boundaries" God has set for us, recognizing His sovereign hand in every detail of our lives, and to steward the blessings and opportunities He has given us.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Gad's inheritance east of the Jordan, unlike most other tribes?
The tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh specifically requested and were granted land east of the Jordan River by Moses, as detailed in Numbers 32. This agreement was made contingent upon their fighting men crossing the Jordan first and assisting the other tribes in conquering the western territories. They fulfilled this commitment, and thus, their inheritance was established on the eastern side, as confirmed in Joshua 13. This arrangement highlights both tribal autonomy and their commitment to the larger Israelite covenant.
What is the significance of "cities, and their villages" being mentioned?
The inclusion of "cities, and their villages" in the description of Gad's inheritance, as seen in Joshua 13:28, signifies a complete and viable portion of land. It indicates that the inheritance was not just open territory but included established communities, infrastructure, and agricultural lands necessary for sustained life, prosperity, and defense. This level of detail underscores the thoroughness of the divine provision and the practical reality of settling the land, ensuring that each tribe received a fully functional and livable inheritance.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Joshua 13:28 describes a physical land inheritance, it powerfully foreshadows the spiritual inheritance found in Christ. The meticulous division of land, ensuring each tribe received its portion, points to God's sovereign plan to provide a permanent dwelling and secure future for His people. In the New Testament, believers are not promised a physical plot of land but an "inheritance" that is "imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven" for them (1 Peter 1:4). Jesus Christ is the ultimate fulfillment of this promise, for in Him, we receive all spiritual blessings (Ephesians 1:3) and are made "heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ" (Romans 8:17). Just as Gad's inheritance was a gift secured by God's faithfulness, our spiritual inheritance is a gift of grace, secured by Christ's finished work on the cross, granting us eternal life, reconciliation with God, and a place in His eternal kingdom (Colossians 1:12-14). The precision of the old covenant land distribution points to the even greater precision and certainty of our new covenant inheritance, eternally secured in the person and work of our Lord Jesus Christ.