پرش به محتوا

Exodus 29:24

“The Ram of Consecration”· Exodus 29:19–34Read in context
King James Version
And thou shalt put all in the hands of Aaron, and in the hands of his sons; and shalt wave them for a wave offering before the LORD.
KJV (with Strong's)
And thou shalt put H7760 all in the hands H3709 of Aaron H175, and in the hands H3709 of his sons H1121; and shalt wave H5130 them for a wave offering H8573 before H6440 the LORD H3068.
Complete Jewish Bible
and put it all in the hands of Aharon and his sons. They are to wave them as a wave offering in the presence of ADONAI.
Berean Standard Bible
Put all these in the hands of Aaron and his sons and wave them before the LORD as a wave offering.
American Standard Version
and thou shalt put the whole upon the hands of Aaron, and upon the hands of his sons, and shalt wave them for a wave-offering before Jehovah.
World English Bible Messianic
You shall put all of this in Aaron’s hands, and in his sons’ hands, and shall wave them for a wave offering before the LORD.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And thou shalt put al this in the handes of Aaron, and in the handes of his sonnes, and shalt shake them to and from before the Lord.
Young's Literal Translation
`And thou hast set the whole on the hands of Aaron, and on the hands of his sons, and hast waved them--a wave-offering before Jehovah;
فارسی · OPV
و این‌ همه‌ را به‌ دست‌ هارون‌ و به‌ دست‌ پسرانش‌ بنه‌، و آنها را برای‌ هدیۀ جنبانیدنی‌ به‌ حضور خداوند بجنبان‌.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 2,361 of 31,102 · 7.6%

Study this verse

Summary

Exodus 29:24 meticulously details a crucial step in the ordination of Aaron and his sons into the Levitical priesthood: the performance of the "wave offering." This ritual act involved Moses placing specific portions of the consecration sacrifice—the fat, the right thigh, the breast, and various unleavened breads—into the hands of the newly appointed priests, who then, guided by Moses, performed a ceremonial waving motion before the altar. This dynamic presentation served as a tangible declaration of dedication and transfer of ownership to the Lord, signifying divine acceptance of the priests and their offerings, thereby establishing their authorized mediation between God and Israel and underscoring the sacredness and precision required for approaching a holy God.

Context

Literary Context

Exodus chapter 29 forms the divine blueprint for the consecration of Aaron and his sons, marking the foundational establishment of Israel's cultic worship and the formalization of the Mosaic covenant. The preceding verses, particularly Exodus 29:1-9, outline the elaborate preparations, including their investiture with sacred garments and anointing with oil, signifying their separation and empowerment for holy service. Immediately prior to this verse, Exodus 29:22-23 specifies the exact portions of the ram of consecration and the unleavened breads to be placed into the priests' hands, setting the stage for the physical act of the wave offering described in Exodus 29:24. The entire chapter, from the initial instructions to the subsequent sin and burnt offerings and the daily burnt offering in Exodus 29:38-42, underscores the profound solemnity, divine initiation, and precise obedience required for those who would mediate between a holy God and His people, culminating in God's promise to dwell among them in Exodus 29:43-46.

Historical & Cultural Context

In the ancient Near East, priesthoods were common, often serving as intermediaries between deities and humanity, performing rituals to maintain cosmic order and secure divine favor. However, Israel's priesthood, as established in Exodus, stood apart. It was uniquely divinely appointed by Yahweh Himself, meticulously regulated, and founded upon a covenant relationship, distinguishing it sharply from pagan practices. The consecration ceremony, culminating in acts like the wave offering, was critical for establishing the legitimacy, sanctity, and authority of the Levitical priests. This emphasis on ritual purity and precise adherence to divine command was paramount for approaching God, who was understood to dwell among His people in the Tabernacle. The Tabernacle served as a sacred space where the divine and human realms intersected, demanding absolute holiness from those who ministered within it. While some parallels to "waving" or "presenting" offerings exist in broader ancient ritual, the Israelite wave offering was specifically imbued with theological meaning within the framework of the Mosaic covenant, symbolizing a unique act of dedication, divine acceptance, and the transfer of sacred responsibility within God's chosen people.

Key Themes

Exodus 29:24 significantly contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Exodus and the Pentateuch. The most prominent is the theme of Divine Appointment and Consecration, highlighting that the priesthood is not a human invention but a divine institution, set apart for holy service. This verse emphasizes the Holiness of God and the corresponding requirement for Human Purity and Obedience in approaching Him, a theme reiterated throughout the laws given at Sinai. The act of the wave offering itself underscores the theme of Sacrifice and Atonement, as the offerings are presented to secure God's favor and to atone for sin, even in the context of priestly ordination. Furthermore, it speaks to the theme of Mediation, as Aaron and his sons are established as the designated intermediaries between God and the people. Finally, the ritual's precise nature reinforces the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Meticulous Command, demonstrating that God dictates the terms of worship and relationship, ensuring that all acts are performed "before the LORD" as prescribed, as seen throughout Exodus 25, Exodus 26, Exodus 27, Exodus 28, Exodus 29, Exodus 30, Exodus 31.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Put sûwm' H7760

This verb signifies "to put, place, set, or appoint." In this context, it denotes Moses' authoritative act of placing the designated portions of the sacrifice into the hands of Aaron and his sons. This act is not merely a physical transfer but a ceremonial conferral of responsibility and authority, formally initiating them into their priestly duties and empowering them to handle sacred offerings. It underscores the divine mandate behind their actions.

Hands kaph' H3709

Meaning "the hollow hand or palm," this term is used figuratively to represent power, authority, and agency. The placement of the offering "in the hands of Aaron, and in the hands of his sons" is profoundly symbolic. It visually confers upon them the unique authority and responsibility to act as priests, making them the divinely designated agents through whom the offering is presented to God. This physical act of empowerment is central to their commissioning.

Wave nûwph' H5130

This primitive root means "to quiver, vibrate up and down, or rock to and fro." It describes the specific physical action of the wave offering, a dynamic movement performed before the altar. This action signifies a presentation to God, acknowledging His ownership and sovereignty over the offering. The movement often implied a transfer of ownership or dedication to the divine, followed by a potential return of a portion for the priests' sustenance, symbolizing God's acceptance and provision.

Wave offering tᵉnûwphâh' H8573

Derived from the verb nûwph, this noun specifically denotes the offering that is "waved." It represents a distinct category of sacrifice, characterized by its unique ceremonial movement. The tᵉnûwphâh was a public, physical declaration of dedication, signifying that the offering was wholly presented to the Lord, often with the understanding that a portion would then be returned to the priests as their divinely appointed share, symbolizing God's acceptance and provision for His servants.

Verse Breakdown

"And thou shalt put all in the hands of Aaron, and in the hands of his sons"

This initial clause directs Moses, as God's appointed agent, to place the specified portions of the ram of consecration—the fat, the right thigh, the breast, and the various unleavened breads and cakes (as detailed in Exodus 29:22-23)—directly into the hands of Aaron and his sons. This act is crucial for their ordination, signifying their active participation and the formal transfer of sacred responsibility to them. It underscores that they are the divinely appointed conduits for these offerings, empowered to handle the holy.

"and shalt wave them"

This is the core instruction for the ritual performance. Moses is to guide Aaron and his sons in the physical act of "waving" these items. This motion, typically a back-and-forth or up-and-down movement, was not merely symbolic but a concrete, kinetic performance of dedication. It was a visual and dynamic prayer, actively presenting the offering to God, acknowledging His supreme authority, ownership, and the priests' complete surrender to His will in their service.

"[for] a wave offering before the LORD"

This concluding phrase clarifies the precise purpose and the divine recipient of the ritual. The waving is specifically designated as a "wave offering" (tᵉnûwphâh), a distinct type of sacrifice intended for Yahweh, the covenant God of Israel. The phrase "before the LORD" emphasizes the divine audience and the sacred nature of the act, indicating that the offering is presented directly into God's presence, seeking His acceptance and favor for the newly consecrated priests and for the establishment of their legitimate ministry.

Literary Devices

Exodus 29:24 employs several significant literary devices that amplify its meaning and underscore the gravity of the priestly ordination. Symbolism is paramount, with the "hands" representing the transfer of authority, responsibility, and agency to the priests, making them active, empowered participants in the sacred ritual. The "wave offering" itself is a powerful symbol of dedication, presentation, and divine acceptance, a tangible and kinetic act that communicates profound spiritual truths about God's ownership and His gracious reception of offerings. The prescriptive language and imperative commands ("thou shalt put," "shalt wave") throughout Exodus 29 highlight the divine origin and non-negotiable nature of these instructions, emphasizing God's absolute authority in establishing the priesthood and its rituals. Furthermore, the repetitive structure of "in the hands of Aaron, and in the hands of his sons" underscores the dual and shared nature of the priestly office, extending the divine mandate and sacred responsibility to both the high priest and his successors, ensuring continuity in Israel's worship.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Exodus 29:24 is deeply significant for understanding the theology of priesthood, sacrifice, and divine-human interaction under the Old Covenant. It highlights the divine initiation and authorization of the priesthood, emphasizing that only those divinely chosen and consecrated could legitimately mediate between God and Israel. The wave offering itself underscores the principle of sacred ritual and ordered worship, demonstrating that approaching a holy God required precise obedience, a tangible act of dedication, and a recognition of His ultimate ownership. This ritual also speaks to divine ownership and gracious provision; while the offering was wholly presented to the Lord, portions were often returned to the priests for their sustenance, symbolizing that all things ultimately belong to God, and He graciously provides for those who serve Him faithfully within the parameters of His covenant. This act of presentation and acceptance foreshadows the greater reality of Christ's perfect offering and God's acceptance of it.

Reflection and Application

The meticulous instructions for the wave offering in Exodus 29:24, though part of an ancient ritual, offer profound insights into the nature of worship, dedication, and our relationship with God that remain profoundly relevant for believers today. This verse reminds us that true worship is not casual or spontaneous but intentional, requiring careful preparation and a conscious act of presenting our lives and gifts to God with reverence and humility. Just as the priests were consecrated and set apart through specific rituals, believers are called to a life of holiness, recognizing that our service and offerings to God should reflect our very best, not merely what is convenient or leftover. As members of a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9), we are called to actively and deliberately present our entire lives—our bodies, talents, resources, and time—as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God (Romans 12:1). This ancient ritual encourages us to consider the intentionality and dedication with which we approach our spiritual duties, ensuring that our acts of worship, service, and giving are truly "waved" before the Lord, signifying our complete surrender and trust in His divine acceptance and provision, not for earning favor, but in grateful response to His grace.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the precision and intentionality required for the wave offering challenge my own approach to worship and service in daily life, prompting me to be more deliberate in my devotion?
  2. In what practical ways can I, as a New Testament believer, "wave" my gifts, talents, and resources before the Lord as an act of complete dedication and trust, recognizing His ownership over all I possess?
  3. What does the concept of divine acceptance, symbolized by the wave offering, mean for my assurance and confidence in Christ today, knowing that through Him, my offerings are always acceptable?

FAQ

What was the difference between a wave offering and a heave offering?

While both were categories of offerings presented to the Lord, they involved distinct physical actions and often had different dispositions. The wave offering (tᵉnûwphâh) involved a horizontal, back-and-forth motion, symbolizing the presentation of the offering to God and His acceptance. Portions of the wave offering, such as the breast of the peace offering (Leviticus 7:30), were typically given to the priests for their sustenance, symbolizing God's provision. The heave offering (tᵉrûmâh), on the other hand, involved a vertical, upward motion, symbolizing the lifting up or setting apart of a portion for God. Examples include the right thigh of the peace offering, which was a heave offering for the priests (Leviticus 7:32), and the firstfruits, which were also heave offerings (Numbers 15:19-20). Both rituals emphasized dedication to God and the sacred nature of the offering, but their specific movements and dispositions varied according to divine instruction.

Why was it necessary for Aaron and his sons to perform this specific ritual?

The wave offering for Aaron and his sons was a critical component of their ordination ceremony, as detailed in Exodus 29. It served several vital purposes: it formally transferred the sacred responsibility of handling offerings to them, signifying their divine appointment and consecration. By physically performing the act, they acknowledged God's ownership of the sacrifice and dedicated themselves to His service. This ritual also symbolized God's acceptance of them as His chosen priests, thereby legitimizing their mediatorial role between God and the people of Israel. It was a public and tangible demonstration of their being set apart for holy service, ensuring that their ministry was divinely authorized and accepted.

Did the wave offering always go to the priests?

Not always. While specific portions of certain wave offerings, such as the breast of the peace offering (Leviticus 7:30-31), were designated for the priests as their sustenance, the primary purpose of the wave offering was the symbolic presentation to the Lord. In some cases, the entire offering might be consumed on the altar, or its disposition could vary based on the specific type of sacrifice. For instance, the wave offering of the sheaf of firstfruits (Leviticus 23:11) was an act of dedication to God, with the produce then available for consumption by the people. The disposition of the wave offering depended on the specific instructions given for each type of sacrifice, always emphasizing its initial presentation to God.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The wave offering of Exodus 29:24, a pivotal act in the consecration of the Levitical priesthood, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The ritual of placing the offering into the hands of the priests and waving it before the Lord foreshadows Christ's complete and willing self-offering. Unlike Aaron and his sons, who continually offered sacrifices for themselves and the people, Jesus, our great High Priest, offered Himself "once for all" (Hebrews 7:27), a perfect and sufficient sacrifice. His body, broken and presented on the cross, was the ultimate "wave offering" to God, signifying His total dedication and God's complete acceptance of His sacrifice for the sins of humanity. The very act of God raising Jesus from the dead can be seen as the divine "receiving back" of the offering, signifying its full acceptance and the establishment of a new covenant (Romans 4:25). Through Christ, believers are now invited to draw near to God directly, not through human mediation or repeated rituals, but by the "new and living way" He consecrated for us through His flesh (Hebrews 10:19-20). His perfect, once-for-all offering renders the shadows of the Levitical system obsolete, inviting us to present our lives as living sacrifices in response to His perfect work (Romans 12:1), a spiritual "wave offering" of praise and service acceptable through Him.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 29:1–37. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 37 verses
Passage under commentExodus 29:1–37
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here is, I. The law concerning the consecration of Aaron and his sons to the priest's office, which was to be done with a great deal of ceremony and solemnity, that they themselves might be duly affected with the greatness of the work to which they were called, and that the people also might learn to magnify the office and none might dare to invade it.

1.The ceremonies wherewith it was to be done were very fully and particularly appointed, because nothing of this kind had been done before, and because it was to be a statute for ever that the high priest should be thus inaugurated. Now,

(1.)The work to be done was the consecrating of the persons whom God had chosen to be priests, by which they devoted and gave up themselves to the service of God and God declared his acceptance of them; and the people were made to know that they glorified not themselves to be made priests, but were called of God, Heb 5:4, Heb 5:5. They were thus distinguished from common men, sequestered from common services, and set apart for God and an immediate attendance on him. Note, All that are to be employed for God are to be sanctified to him. The person must first be accepted, and then the performance. The Hebrew phrase for consecrating is filling the hand (Exo 29:9): Thou shalt fill the hand of Aaron and his sons, and the ram of consecration is the ram of fillings, Exo 29:22, Exo 29:26. The consecrating of them was the perfecting of them; Christ is said to be perfect or consecrated for evermore, Heb 7:28. Probably the phrase here is borrowed from the putting of the sacrifice into their hand, to be waved before the Lord, Exo 29:24. But it intimates,

[1.]That ministers have their hands full; they have no time to trifle, so great, so copious, so constant is their work.

[2.]That they must have their hands filled. Of necessity they must have something to offer, and they cannot find it in themselves, it must be given them from above. They cannot fill the people's hearts unless God fill their hands; to him therefore they must go, and receive from his fulness.

(2.)The person to do it was Moses, by God's appointment. Though he was ordained for men, yet the people were not to consecrate him; Moses the servant of the Lord, and his agent herein, must do it. By God's special appointment he now did the priest's work, and therefore that which was the priest's part of the sacrifice was here ordered to be his, Exo 29:26.

(3.)The place was at the door of the tabernacle of meeting, Exo 29:4. God was pleased to dwell in the tabernacle, the people attending in the courts, so that the door between the court and the tabernacle was the fittest place for those to be consecrated in who were to mediate between God and man, and to stand between both, and lay their hands (as it were) upon both. They were consecrated at the door, for they were to be door-keepers.

(4.)It was done with many ceremonies.

[1.]They were to be washed (Exo 29:4), signifying that those must be clean who bear the vessels of the Lord, Isa 52:11. Those that would perfect holiness must cleanse themselves from all filthiness of flesh and spirit, Co2 7:1; Isa 1:16-18. They were now washed all over; but afterwards, when they went in to minister, they washed only their hands and feet (Exo 30:19); for he that is washed needs no more, Joh 13:10.

[2.]They were to be clothed with the holy garments (Exo 29:5, Exo 29:6, Exo 29:8, Exo 29:9), to signify that it was not sufficient for them to put away the pollutions of sin, but they must put on the graces of the Spirit, be clothed with righteousness, Psa 132:9. They must be girded, as men prepared and strengthened for their work; and they must be robed and crowned, as men that counted their work and office their true honour.

[3.]The high priest was to be anointed with the holy anointing oil (Exo 29:7), that the church might be filled and delighted with the sweet savour of his administrations (for ointment and perfume rejoice the heart), and in token of the pouring out of the Spirit upon him, to qualify him for his work. Brotherly love is compared to this oil with which Aaron was anointed, Psa 133:2. The inferior priests are said to be anointed (Exo 30:30), not on their heads, as the high priest (Lev 21:10), the oil was only mingled with the blood that was sprinkled upon their garments.

[4.]Sacrifices were to be offered for them. The covenant of priesthood, as all other covenants, must be made by sacrifice.

First, There must be a sin-offering, to make atonement for them, Exo 29:10-14. The law made those priests that had infirmity, and therefore they must first offer for their own sin, before they could make atonement for the people, Heb 7:27, Heb 7:28. They were to put their hand on the head of their sacrifice (Exo 29:10), confessing that they deserved to die for their own sin, and desiring that the killing of the beast might expiate their guilt, and be accepted as a vicarious satisfaction. It was used as other sin-offerings were; only, whereas the flesh of other sin-offerings was eaten by the priests (Lev 10:18), in token of the priest's taking away the sin of the people, this was appointed to be all burnt without the camp (Exo 29:14), to signify the imperfection of the legal dispensation (as the learned bishop Patrick notes); for the sins of the priests themselves could not be taken away by those sacrifices, but they must expect a better high priest and a better sacrifice.

Secondly, There must be a burnt-offering, a ram wholly burnt, to the honour of God, in token of the dedication of themselves wholly to God and to his service, as living sacrifices, kindled with the fire and ascending in the flame of holy love, Exo 29:15-18. The sin-offering must first be offered and then the burnt-offering; for, till guilt be removed, no acceptable service can be performed, Isa 6:7.

Thirdly, There must be a peace-offering; it is called the ram of consecration, because there was more in this peculiar to the occasion than in the other two. In the burnt-offering God had the glory of their priesthood, in this they had the comfort of it; and, in token of a mutual covenant between God and them, 1. The blood of the sacrifice was divided between God and them (Exo 29:20, Exo 29:21); part of the blood was sprinkled upon the altar round about, and part put upon them, upon their bodies (Exo 29:20), and upon their garments, Exo 29:21. Thus the benefit of the expiation made by the sacrifice was applied and assured to them, and their whole selves from head to foot sanctified to the service of God. The blood was put upon the extreme parts of the body, to signify that it was all, as it were, enclosed and taken in for God, the tip of the ear and the great toe not excepted. We reckon that the blood and oil sprinkled upon garments spot and stain them; yet the holy oil, and the blood of the sacrifice, sprinkled upon their garments, must be looked upon as the greatest adorning imaginable to them, for they signified the blood of Christ, and the graces of the Spirit, which constitute and complete the beauty of holiness, and recommend us to God; we read of robes made white with the blood of the Lamb. 2. The flesh of the sacrifice, with the meat-offering annexed to it, was likewise divided between God and them, that (to speak with reverence) God and they might feast together, in token of friendship and fellowship. (1.) Part of it was to be first waved before the Lord, and then burnt upon the altar; part of the flesh (Exo 29:22), part of the bread, for bread and flesh must go together (Exo 29:23); these were first put into the hands of Aaron to be waved to and fro, in token of their being offered to God (who, though unseen, yet compasses us round on every side), and then they were to be burnt upon the altar (Exo 29:24, Exo 29:25), for the altar was to devour God's part of the sacrifice. Thus God admitted Aaron and his sons to be his servants, and wait at his table, taking the mat of his altar from their hands. Here, in a parenthesis, as it were, comes in the law concerning the priests' part of the peace-offerings afterwards, the breast and shoulder, which were now divided; Moses had the breast, and the shoulder was burnt on the altar with God's part, Exo 29:26-28. (2.) The other part, both of the flesh of the ram and of the bread, Aaron and his sons were to eat at the door of the tabernacle (Exo 29:31-33), to signify that he called them not only servants but friends, Joh 15:15. He supped with them, and they with him. Their eating of the things wherewith the atonement was made signified their receiving the atonement, as the expression is (Rom 5:11), their thankful acceptance of the benefit of it, and their joyful communion with God thereupon, which was the true intent and meaning of a feast upon a sacrifice. If any of it was left, it must be burnt, that it might not be in any danger of putrefying, and to show that it was an extraordinary peace-offering.

2.The time that was to be spent in this consecration: Seven days shalt thou consecrate them, Exo 29:35. Though all the ceremonies were performed on the first day, yet,

(1.)They were not to look upon their consecration as completed till the seven days' end, which put a solemnity upon their admission, and a distance between this and their former state, and obliged them to enter upon their work with a pause, giving them time to consider the weight and seriousness of it. This was to be observed in after-ages, Exo 29:30. He that was to succeed Aaron in the high-priesthood must put on the holy garments seven days together, in token of a deliberate and gradual advance into his office, and that one sabbath might pass over him in his consecration.

(2.)Every day of the seven, in this first consecration, a bullock was to be offered for a sin-offering (Exo 29:36), which was to intimate to them,

[1.]That it was of very great concern to them to get their sins pardoned, and that though atonement was made, and they had the comfort of it, yet they must still keep up a penitent sense of sin and often repeat the confession of it.

[2.]That those sacrifices which were thus offered day by day to make atonement could not make the comers thereunto perfect, for then they would have ceased to be offered, as the apostle argues, Heb 10:1, Heb 10:2. They must therefore expect the bringing in of a better hope.

3.This consecration of the priests was a shadow of good things to come.

(1.)Our Lord Jesus is the great high-priest of our profession, called of God to be so, consecrated for evermore, anointed with the Spirit above his fellows (whence he is called Messiah, the Christ), clothed with the holy garments, even with glory and beauty, sanctified by his own blood, not that of bullocks and rams (Heb 9:12), made perfect, or consecrated, through sufferings, Heb 2:10. Thus in him this was a perpetual statute, Exo 29:9.

(2.)All believers are spiritual priests, to offer spiritual sacrifices (Pe1 2:5), washed in the blood of Christ, and so made to our God priests, Rev 1:5, Rev 1:6. They also are clothed with the beauty of holiness, and have received the anointing, Jo1 2:27. Their hands are filled with work, to which they must continually attend; and it is through Christ, the great sacrifice, that they are dedicated to this service. His blood sprinkled upon the conscience purges it from dead works, that they may, as priests, serve the living God. The Spirit of God (as Ainsworth notes) is called the finger of God (Luk 11:20, compared with Mat 12:28), and by him the merit of Christ is effectually applied to our souls, as here Moses with his finger was to put the blood upon Aaron. It is likewise intimated that gospel ministers are to be solemnly set apart to the work of the ministry with great deliberation and seriousness both in the ordainers and in the ordained, as those that are to be employed in a great work and entrusted with a great charge.

II.The consecration of the altar, which seems to have been coincident with that of the priests, and the sin-offerings which were offered every day for seven days together had reference to the altar as well as the priests, Exo 29:36, Exo 29:37. An atonement was made for the altar. Though that was not a subject capable of sin, nor, having never yet been used, could it be said to be polluted with the sins of the people, yet, since the fall, there can be no sanctification to God but there must first be an atonement for sin, which renders us both unworthy and unfit to be employed for God. The altar was also sanctified, not only set apart itself to a sacred use, but made so holy as to sanctify the gifts that were offered upon it, Mat 23:19. Christ is our altar; for our sakes he sanctified himself, that we and our performances might be sanctified and recommended to God, Joh 17:19.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Exodus 29:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8