Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And thou shalt bring his sons, and put coats upon them.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And thou shalt bring H7126 his sons H1121, and put H3847 coats H3801 upon them.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Bring his sons; put tunics on them;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Present his sons as well and clothe them with tunics.
Ask
American Standard Version
And thou shalt bring his sons, and put coats upon them.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
You shall bring his sons, and put coats on them.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And thou shalt bring his sonnes, and put coates vpon them,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And his sons thou dost bring near, and hast clothed them with coats,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 2,345 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Exodus 29:8 describes a pivotal moment in the ordination ceremony of Aaron's sons, commanding Moses to bring them forward and clothe them with specific priestly garments. This concise instruction is part of God's elaborate and meticulous directives for establishing the Aaronic priesthood, emphasizing the divine origin of sacred office, the necessity of ritual purity, and the visible distinction required for those set apart to serve the Lord in the Tabernacle.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is an integral part of the detailed instructions for the consecration of the Aaronic priesthood, spanning Exodus 28 and Exodus 29. While Exodus 28 focuses extensively on the elaborate garments for Aaron, the High Priest, Exodus 29:1-7 outlines the initial steps of the consecration ceremony, including washing and anointing Aaron. Verse 8 then shifts focus to Aaron's sons, who were to serve as ordinary priests. The clothing of the sons follows the anointing of Aaron, indicating a sequential and hierarchical process of ordination. This specific command is not merely a practical instruction but a divinely mandated ritual, essential for their separation and preparation for sacred service in the Tabernacle. The entire chapter emphasizes the divine origin and precise nature of the Levitical priesthood.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, priestly vestments were common and served to distinguish religious officiants from the general populace, often signifying their status, purity, and connection to the deity. However, Israel's priestly garments, as described in Exodus 28-29, were unique in their divine prescription and symbolic meaning. Unlike pagan priests whose attire might reflect magical powers or cultic practices, the Israelite priestly garments were designed to represent holiness, purity, and the glory of God, preparing the priests to minister in the presence of a holy God. The act of "putting coats upon them" was a public and ceremonial act of investiture, marking their transition from ordinary men to consecrated servants. This was not a self-appointed role but a divinely ordained office, emphasizing God's sovereignty over who could approach Him and how. The meticulous detail reflects the gravity of ministering before the Lord and the absolute necessity of adhering to His commands for proper worship.
  • Key Themes: Exodus 29:8 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in the book of Exodus and the Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of Divine Appointment and Consecration, underscoring that access to God and service in His presence are not human initiatives but divine prerogatives, meticulously prescribed by God Himself (Exodus 28:1). This verse also highlights the theme of Holiness and Purity, as the garments symbolize the necessary separation and ritual cleanliness required for those who mediate between a holy God and His people (Exodus 19:6). Finally, it reinforces the theme of Covenant Relationship and Obedience, demonstrating Israel's commitment to God's detailed instructions as a sign of their covenant faithfulness, a pattern seen throughout the giving of the Law on Mount Sinai.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • bring (Hebrew, qârab, H7126): From the primitive root H7126, this word means "to approach" or, in its causative form, "to cause to approach" or "to present." In a cultic context, as here, it signifies bringing someone or something near to God for sacred purposes. Moses is commanded to "bring" Aaron's sons, emphasizing the solemn act of presenting these individuals before God for their formal induction into holy service. It underscores the divine initiative in calling and setting apart individuals for ministry.
  • sons (Hebrew, bên, H1121): Derived from H1121, meaning "a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense." Here, it refers specifically to the male descendants of Aaron. Their inclusion alongside Aaron himself establishes the hereditary nature of the priesthood in Israel, ensuring a continuous line of officiants for the Tabernacle and later the Temple. This hereditary principle was central to the Mosaic covenant's priestly system, distinguishing it from other religious systems where priests might be chosen differently.
  • coats (Hebrew, kᵉthôneth, H3801): This term refers to a tunic or long shirt, typically made of fine linen. These were the basic undergarments for all priests, symbolizing purity, righteousness, and humility. Unlike Aaron's more elaborate outer garments (e.g., ephod, breastplate), the kᵉthôneth was simpler, yet equally essential and divinely prescribed, distinguishing the priests from the common people and signifying their readiness for service in the holy place.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And thou shalt bring his sons,": This clause emphasizes Moses' pivotal role as the divinely appointed agent to execute God's commands. He is not merely observing but actively participating in the consecration process by physically presenting Aaron's sons. The act of "bringing" them signifies their formal presentation before God for sacred service, a public act of dedication and separation from the common realm. It highlights the divine initiative in calling and setting apart individuals for ministry, which is then carried out through human agency.
  • "and put coats upon them.": This is the core command of the verse, detailing the specific act of clothing. The "coats" (Hebrew kᵉthôneth) were the first and most basic priestly garments. The act of putting them on was a ceremonial investiture, marking the formal induction of Aaron's sons into their priestly office. This was not merely about modesty or identification; it was a ritual act symbolizing purity, readiness for service, and their distinct status as consecrated servants of the Lord, set apart to mediate between God and Israel.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in Exodus 29:8, and indeed throughout the instructions for the Tabernacle, is Symbolism. The "coats" themselves are symbolic, representing purity, holiness, and the distinct identity of those set apart for God's service. Their material (fine linen, as implied elsewhere for priestly garments) further reinforces the idea of ritual cleanliness required for approaching a holy God. The act of "putting coats upon them" is an act of Investiture, a public and ritualistic conferral of office, which visually communicates the transition from ordinary status to consecrated priesthood. Furthermore, the imperative mood ("thou shalt bring," "put") throughout these instructions highlights the absolute nature of God's Divine Command, emphasizing His sovereignty and the necessity of precise obedience in all matters related to worship and service.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Exodus 29:8, though brief, is rich in theological implications. It underscores the divine initiative in establishing the priesthood, emphasizing that service to God is not self-appointed but divinely ordained and meticulously prescribed. The act of clothing the priests signifies their separation and sanctification for holy service, highlighting the importance of purity and distinction for those who draw near to God. This physical act of investiture foreshadows a spiritual reality: that those who serve God must be properly "clothed" – not just externally, but with righteousness and holiness, enabling them to mediate between God and humanity. The meticulousness of the instructions also speaks to God's holiness and His demand for reverence and order in worship, setting a precedent for all who would approach Him.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the literal wearing of priestly coats is no longer required for New Covenant believers, the principles embedded in Exodus 29:8 remain profoundly relevant. As Christians, we are called a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9), set apart to offer spiritual sacrifices and proclaim God's praises. This means our spiritual "clothing" – our character, conduct, and commitment – must reflect the holiness of God. Just as the physical garments distinguished the Old Testament priests, our lives should visibly distinguish us as those consecrated to Christ. This involves embracing a life of purity, humility, and readiness for service, understanding that our ministry flows from a divine appointment and requires careful adherence to God's Word. The meticulous nature of God's instructions reminds us that He cares about how we approach Him and serve Him, calling us to intentionality, reverence, and integrity in our spiritual walk.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways does my daily life demonstrate that I am "clothed" for spiritual service, reflecting purity and distinction?
  • How does the concept of divine appointment for service impact my understanding of my own calling and ministry?
  • What "garments" (attitudes, habits, character traits) might I need to put on or take off to better serve God in holiness?

FAQ

Why were the coats for Aaron's sons simpler than Aaron's own garments?

Answer: The simplicity of the coats for Aaron's sons, compared to Aaron's elaborate High Priestly garments, reflected their respective roles and hierarchy within the priesthood. Aaron, as the High Priest, was the primary mediator and representative of Israel before God, bearing the names of the tribes on his breastplate and shoulders, symbolizing his unique intercessory role. His garments were designed for "glory and for beauty" (Exodus 28:2), signifying the majesty of God whom he represented. Aaron's sons, as ordinary priests, performed the daily sacrificial and Tabernacle duties. Their simpler linen coats (kᵉthôneth) symbolized purity, humility, and readiness for service, emphasizing the clean and holy nature required for all who ministered in the Tabernacle. Both sets of garments were divinely prescribed, but their differences highlighted the distinct functions and levels of authority within the established priestly order.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Exodus 29:8, with its emphasis on the ceremonial clothing of priests, finds its ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ, our Great High Priest (Hebrews 4:14). Unlike Aaron's sons, who required physical garments to signify their separation and purity, Jesus needed no such external cleansing or investiture. He was inherently pure, "holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners" (Hebrews 7:26). His "garment" was His own perfect righteousness and sinless life, which perfectly qualified Him to approach God and to serve as the perfect mediator. Furthermore, Christ's work on the cross provides a spiritual "clothing" for all believers. Through faith in Him, we are "clothed with Christ" (Galatians 3:27) and receive His righteousness, becoming a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9) ourselves, able to draw near to God not by our own merit or ritualistic clothing, but by the perfect sacrifice and imputed righteousness of our Savior. The physical garments of the Old Covenant priests thus typologically point to the spiritual purity and perfect mediation achieved solely through Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on Exodus 29 verses 1–37

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here is, I. The law concerning the consecration of Aaron and his sons to the priest's office, which was to be done with a great deal of ceremony and solemnity, that they themselves might be duly affected with the greatness of the work to which they were called, and that the people also might learn to magnify the office and none might dare to invade it.

1.The ceremonies wherewith it was to be done were very fully and particularly appointed, because nothing of this kind had been done before, and because it was to be a statute for ever that the high priest should be thus inaugurated. Now,

(1.)The work to be done was the consecrating of the persons whom God had chosen to be priests, by which they devoted and gave up themselves to the service of God and God declared his acceptance of them; and the people were made to know that they glorified not themselves to be made priests, but were called of God, Heb 5:4, Heb 5:5. They were thus distinguished from common men, sequestered from common services, and set apart for God and an immediate attendance on him. Note, All that are to be employed for God are to be sanctified to him. The person must first be accepted, and then the performance. The Hebrew phrase for consecrating is filling the hand (Exo 29:9): Thou shalt fill the hand of Aaron and his sons, and the ram of consecration is the ram of fillings, Exo 29:22, Exo 29:26. The consecrating of them was the perfecting of them; Christ is said to be perfect or consecrated for evermore, Heb 7:28. Probably the phrase here is borrowed from the putting of the sacrifice into their hand, to be waved before the Lord, Exo 29:24. But it intimates, [1.] That ministers have their hands full; they have no time to trifle, so great, so copious, so constant is their work. [2.] That they must have their hands filled. Of necessity they must have something to offer, and they cannot find it in themselves, it must be given them from above. They cannot fill the people's hearts unless God fill their hands; to him therefore they must go, and receive from his fulness.

(2.)The person to do it was Moses, by God's appointment. Though he was ordained for men, yet the people were not to consecrate him; Moses the servant of the Lord, and his agent herein, must do it. By God's special appointment he now did the priest's work, and therefore that which was the priest's part of the sacrifice was here ordered to be his, Exo 29:26.

(3.)The place was at the door of the tabernacle of meeting, Exo 29:4. God was pleased to dwell in the tabernacle, the people attending in the courts, so that the door between the court and the tabernacle was the fittest place for those to be consecrated in who were to mediate between God and man, and to stand between both, and lay their hands (as it were) upon both. They were consecrated at the door, for they were to be door-keepers.

(4.)It was done with many ceremonies.

[1.]They were to be washed (Exo 29:4), signifying that those must be clean who bear the vessels of the Lord, Isa 52:11. Those that would perfect holiness must cleanse themselves from all filthiness of flesh and spirit, Co2 7:1; Isa 1:16-18. They were now washed all over; but afterwards, when they went in to minister, they washed only their hands and feet (Exo 30:19); for he that is washed needs no more, Joh 13:10.

[2.]They were to be clothed with the holy garments (Exo 29:5, Exo 29:6, Exo 29:8, Exo 29:9), to signify that it was not sufficient for them to put away the pollutions of sin, but they must put on the graces of the Spirit, be clothed with righteousness, Psa 132:9. They must be girded, as men prepared and strengthened for their work; and they must be robed and crowned, as men that counted their work and office their true honour.

[3.]The high priest was to be anointed with the holy anointing oil (Exo 29:7), that the church might be filled and delighted with the sweet savour of his administrations (for ointment and perfume rejoice the heart), and in token of the pouring out of the Spirit upon him, to qualify him for his work. Brotherly love is compared to this oil with which Aaron was anointed, Psa 133:2. The inferior priests are said to be anointed (Exo 30:30), not on their heads, as the high priest (Lev 21:10), the oil was only mingled with the blood that was sprinkled upon their garments.

[4.]Sacrifices were to be offered for them. The covenant of priesthood, as all other covenants, must be made by sacrifice.

First, There must be a sin-offering, to make atonement for them, Exo 29:10-14. The law made those priests that had infirmity, and therefore they must first offer for their own sin, before they could make atonement for the people, Heb 7:27, Heb 7:28. They were to put their hand on the head of their sacrifice (Exo 29:10), confessing that they deserved to die for their own sin, and desiring that the killing of the beast might expiate their guilt, and be accepted as a vicarious satisfaction. It was used as other sin-offerings were; only, whereas the flesh of other sin-offerings was eaten by the priests (Lev 10:18), in token of the priest's taking away the sin of the people, this was appointed to be all burnt without the camp (Exo 29:14), to signify the imperfection of the legal dispensation (as the learned bishop Patrick notes); for the sins of the priests themselves could not be taken away by those sacrifices, but they must expect a better high priest and a better sacrifice.

Secondly, There must be a burnt-offering, a ram wholly burnt, to the honour of God, in token of the dedication of themselves wholly to God and to his service, as living sacrifices, kindled with the fire and ascending in the flame of holy love, Exo 29:15-18. The sin-offering must first be offered and then the burnt-offering; for, till guilt be removed, no acceptable service can be performed, Isa 6:7.

Thirdly, There must be a peace-offering; it is called the ram of consecration, because there was more in this peculiar to the occasion than in the other two. In the burnt-offering God had the glory of their priesthood, in this they had the comfort of it; and, in token of a mutual covenant between God and them, 1. The blood of the sacrifice was divided between God and them (Exo 29:20, Exo 29:21); part of the blood was sprinkled upon the altar round about, and part put upon them, upon their bodies (Exo 29:20), and upon their garments, Exo 29:21. Thus the benefit of the expiation made by the sacrifice was applied and assured to them, and their whole selves from head to foot sanctified to the service of God. The blood was put upon the extreme parts of the body, to signify that it was all, as it were, enclosed and taken in for God, the tip of the ear and the great toe not excepted. We reckon that the blood and oil sprinkled upon garments spot and stain them; yet the holy oil, and the blood of the sacrifice, sprinkled upon their garments, must be looked upon as the greatest adorning imaginable to them, for they signified the blood of Christ, and the graces of the Spirit, which constitute and complete the beauty of holiness, and recommend us to God; we read of robes made white with the blood of the Lamb. 2. The flesh of the sacrifice, with the meat-offering annexed to it, was likewise divided between God and them, that (to speak with reverence) God and they might feast together, in token of friendship and fellowship. (1.) Part of it was to be first waved before the Lord, and then burnt upon the altar; part of the flesh (Exo 29:22), part of the bread, for bread and flesh must go together (Exo 29:23); these were first put into the hands of Aaron to be waved to and fro, in token of their being offered to God (who, though unseen, yet compasses us round on every side), and then they were to be burnt upon the altar (Exo 29:24, Exo 29:25), for the altar was to devour God's part of the sacrifice. Thus God admitted Aaron and his sons to be his servants, and wait at his table, taking the mat of his altar from their hands. Here, in a parenthesis, as it were, comes in the law concerning the priests' part of the peace-offerings afterwards, the breast and shoulder, which were now divided; Moses had the breast, and the shoulder was burnt on the altar with God's part, Exo 29:26-28. (2.) The other part, both of the flesh of the ram and of the bread, Aaron and his sons were to eat at the door of the tabernacle (Exo 29:31-33), to signify that he called them not only servants but friends, Joh 15:15. He supped with them, and they with him. Their eating of the things wherewith the atonement was made signified their receiving the atonement, as the expression is (Rom 5:11), their thankful acceptance of the benefit of it, and their joyful communion with God thereupon, which was the true intent and meaning of a feast upon a sacrifice. If any of it was left, it must be burnt, that it might not be in any danger of putrefying, and to show that it was an extraordinary peace-offering.

2.The time that was to be spent in this consecration: Seven days shalt thou consecrate them, Exo 29:35. Though all the ceremonies were performed on the first day, yet, (1.) They were not to look upon their consecration as completed till the seven days' end, which put a solemnity upon their admission, and a distance between this and their former state, and obliged them to enter upon their work with a pause, giving them time to consider the weight and seriousness of it. This was to be observed in after-ages, Exo 29:30. He that was to succeed Aaron in the high-priesthood must put on the holy garments seven days together, in token of a deliberate and gradual advance into his office, and that one sabbath might pass over him in his consecration. (2.) Every day of the seven, in this first consecration, a bullock was to be offered for a sin-offering (Exo 29:36), which was to intimate to them, [1.] That it was of very great concern to them to get their sins pardoned, and that though atonement was made, and they had the comfort of it, yet they must still keep up a penitent sense of sin and often repeat the confession of it. [2.] That those sacrifices which were thus offered day by day to make atonement could not make the comers thereunto perfect, for then they would have ceased to be offered, as the apostle argues, Heb 10:1, Heb 10:2. They must therefore expect the bringing in of a better hope.

3.This consecration of the priests was a shadow of good things to come. (1.) Our Lord Jesus is the great high-priest of our profession, called of God to be so, consecrated for evermore, anointed with the Spirit above his fellows (whence he is called Messiah, the Christ), clothed with the holy garments, even with glory and beauty, sanctified by his own blood, not that of bullocks and rams (Heb 9:12), made perfect, or consecrated, through sufferings, Heb 2:10. Thus in him this was a perpetual statute, Exo 29:9. (2.) All believers are spiritual priests, to offer spiritual sacrifices (Pe1 2:5), washed in the blood of Christ, and so made to our God priests, Rev 1:5, Rev 1:6. They also are clothed with the beauty of holiness, and have received the anointing, Jo1 2:27. Their hands are filled with work, to which they must continually attend; and it is through Christ, the great sacrifice, that they are dedicated to this service. His blood sprinkled upon the conscience purges it from dead works, that they may, as priests, serve the living God. The Spirit of God (as Ainsworth notes) is called the finger of God (Luk 11:20, compared with Mat 12:28), and by him the merit of Christ is effectually applied to our souls, as here Moses with his finger was to put the blood upon Aaron. It is likewise intimated that gospel ministers are to be solemnly set apart to the work of the ministry with great deliberation and seriousness both in the ordainers and in the ordained, as those that are to be employed in a great work and entrusted with a great charge.

II. The consecration of the altar, which seems to have been coincident with that of the priests, and the sin-offerings which were offered every day for seven days together had reference to the altar as well as the priests, Exo 29:36, Exo 29:37. An atonement was made for the altar. Though that was not a subject capable of sin, nor, having never yet been used, could it be said to be polluted with the sins of the people, yet, since the fall, there can be no sanctification to God but there must first be an atonement for sin, which renders us both unworthy and unfit to be employed for God. The altar was also sanctified, not only set apart itself to a sacred use, but made so holy as to sanctify the gifts that were offered upon it, Mat 23:19. Christ is our altar; for our sakes he sanctified himself, that we and our performances might be sanctified and recommended to God, Joh 17:19.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–37. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Exodus 29:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.