Skip to content

Genesis 4:23

“The Line of Cain”· Genesis 4:17–24Read in context
King James Version
¶ And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.
KJV (with Strong's)
And Lamech H3929 said H559 unto his wives H802, Adah H5711 and Zillah H6741, Hear H8085 my voice H6963; ye wives H802 of Lamech H3929, hearken H238 unto my speech H565: for I have slain H2026 a man H376 to my wounding H6482, and a young man H3206 to my hurt H2250.
Complete Jewish Bible
Lemekh said to his wives,

“‘Adah and Tzilah, listen to me;
wives of Lemekh, hear what I say:
I killed a man for wounding me,
a young man who injured me.
Berean Standard Bible
Then Lamech said to his wives: “Adah and Zillah, hear my voice; wives of Lamech, listen to my speech. For I have slain a man for wounding me, a young man for striking me.
American Standard Version
And Lamech said unto his wives: Adah and Zillah, hear my voice; Ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: For I have slain a man for wounding me, And a young man for bruising me:
World English Bible Messianic
Lamech said to his wives, “Adah and Zillah, hear my voice. You wives of Lamech, listen to my speech, for I have slain a man for wounding me, a young man for bruising me.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Lamech saide vnto his wiues Adah and Zillah, Heare my voyce, ye wiues of Lamech: hearken vnto my speach: for I would slay a man in my wound, and a yong man in mine hurt.
Young's Literal Translation
And Lamech saith to his wives: --`Adah and Zillah, hear my voice; Wives of Lamech, give ear to my saying: For a man I have slain for my wound, Even a young man for my hurt;
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 103 of 31,102 · 0.3%

Study this verse

Summary

Genesis 4:23 presents Lamech's chilling declaration to his wives, Adah and Zillah, where he boasts of having killed a man for a wound and a young man for a mere hurt. This pronouncement serves as a stark and disturbing illustration of the rapid escalation of sin, violence, and unchecked vengeance within Cain's lineage, revealing the deepening depravity of humanity in the pre-Flood world. It stands in grim contrast to God's earlier protective decree over Cain, highlighting a profound societal descent into lawlessness and the accelerating moral decay that would eventually necessitate divine judgment.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is situated within Genesis 4, a chapter that meticulously traces the initial spread of sin and its consequences following the fall of humanity. Immediately preceding Lamech's declaration, the narrative details the advancements of early civilization through his sons: Jabal, the father of tent-dwellers and livestock breeders; Jubal, the ancestor of musicians; and Tubal-Cain, a master metalworker. This cultural progress, however, is starkly juxtaposed with Lamech's violent boast, which serves as a grim counterpoint, suggesting that human ingenuity and development can coexist with, or even be overshadowed by, profound moral corruption. Lamech's words also set the stage for the dramatic escalation of violence described in the very next verse, Genesis 4:24, and foreshadow the pervasive wickedness that precipitates the Flood narrative in Genesis 6.

Historical & Cultural Context

Lamech is presented as the seventh generation from Cain, a lineage marked by separation from God. His actions reflect the societal norms and moral decay of the antediluvian world, where human life appears to have become increasingly devalued. The concept of "vengeance" was prevalent in ancient Near Eastern societies, often tied to tribal honor and retribution. However, Lamech's boast goes beyond a simple act of self-defense or even proportional retribution; it signifies a disproportionate and proud act of violence for a minor offense. His polygamy, the first explicitly recorded in Scripture, also deviates from God's original design for marriage established in Genesis 2:24, further illustrating the moral degradation of this period. This context paints a picture of a world rapidly spiraling into lawlessness, where human autonomy and self-interest superseded divine standards.

Key Themes

Lamech's declaration powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the escalation of sin, demonstrating how sin, once introduced, does not remain static but intensifies in its destructive power from Cain's singular murder to Lamech's boastful, disproportionate violence. Secondly, it highlights the theme of human depravity, revealing the extent of humanity's fallen nature and its capacity for brutality and self-exaltation apart from God's restraining grace. This foreshadows the pervasive wickedness described later in Genesis 6:5. Thirdly, the passage implicitly addresses the distortion of God's original design, contrasting Lamech's polygamy and his disregard for human life with the divine ordinances for marriage and the sanctity of life established at creation. Finally, it sets up a crucial contrast between human vengeance and divine justice, showing the dangerous human tendency towards self-appointed, excessive retribution, which stands in stark opposition to God's perfect and measured justice.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

slain hârag' H2026

This primitive root signifies "to smite with deadly intent," encompassing actions like destroying, killing, or murdering. In Lamech's declaration, it emphasizes the deliberate and fatal nature of his actions, indicating that he intentionally took a life, not accidentally or in a moment of passion, but with a clear purpose to kill.

wounding petsaʻ' H6482

Derived from a root meaning "to cut open," this word refers to a physical wound or injury. Lamech claims to have killed a man "to my wounding," suggesting that the man had inflicted a wound upon him. The use of this term highlights the perceived provocation for Lamech's extreme retaliation, implying a physical injury, however minor, as the catalyst for murder.

hurt chabbûwrâh' H2250

This term refers to a "weal," "blueness," "bruise," or "stripe," indicating a less severe injury than a "wound." Lamech's parallel statement, "a young man to my hurt," suggests an even lesser provocation for the second killing. The distinction between "wounding" and "hurt" underscores the disproportionate nature of Lamech's response, as he claims to have taken a life for what might have been a mere bruise or slight injury.

Verse Breakdown

"And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah,"

This opening clause introduces the speaker, Lamech, and his audience, his two wives. The fact that he addresses both wives, Adah and Zillah, is significant as Lamech is the first recorded polygamist in Scripture, a deviation from God's original design for marriage. This address sets a formal, almost boastful, tone for the declaration that follows, indicating a deliberate and public pronouncement rather than a private confession.

"Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech:"

Lamech demands the full attention of his wives, using a strong, emphatic parallelism ("Hear my voice... hearken unto my speech"). This is not a plea for sympathy or understanding, but a command for them to listen to his self-aggrandizing account. The repetition underscores the importance Lamech places on his own words and actions, positioning himself as an authority figure demanding recognition for his deeds.

"for I have slain a man to my wounding,"

This is the first part of Lamech's boast. He declares that he has "slain" (killed) a man. The crucial phrase "to my wounding" (Hebrew le-petsa'i) indicates the reason or consequence. While some interpretations suggest self-defense, the prevailing understanding, especially in light of the subsequent verse, is that Lamech killed because the man had wounded him. This implies a retaliatory act, where the response (death) far exceeds the provocation (a wound).

"and a young man to my hurt."

This clause parallels the previous one, reinforcing Lamech's violent act. He also "slain" (implied from the previous clause) a "young man" (Hebrew yeled), this time "to my hurt" (Hebrew le-chabburati). The term "hurt" (a bruise or weal) suggests an even lesser injury than a "wounding." This second instance further highlights the disproportionate nature of Lamech's vengeance, demonstrating a willingness to take a life for even a minor physical slight, revealing a profound lack of regard for human life.

Literary Devices

Genesis 4:23 employs several literary devices to convey its chilling message. Parallelism is prominent, particularly in the phrases "to my wounding" and "to my hurt," and implicitly in "slain a man" and "a young man." This structural repetition emphasizes the two instances of violence and the escalating nature of Lamech's retribution. The passage also uses hyperbole in the implied disproportionate response, where a life is taken for a wound or a mere bruise, setting the stage for the explicit hyperbole of seventy-sevenfold vengeance in the following verse. Lamech's address itself functions as a boast or rhetorical declaration, not a confession of guilt. His commanding tone, "Hear my voice... hearken unto my speech," uses imperative language to underscore his authority and the pride he takes in his violent acts. The verse also serves as foreshadowing, hinting at the widespread violence and corruption that will characterize the pre-Flood world, leading to God's judgment in Genesis 6.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Lamech's declaration in Genesis 4:23 serves as a profound theological marker, illustrating the rapid and destructive progression of sin in the early chapters of human history. It vividly demonstrates how the initial transgression of Cain, a single act of murder driven by jealousy, metastasizes into a boastful, disproportionate, and self-justifying violence in Lamech's generation. This escalation highlights humanity's accelerating alienation from God's righteous standards and the increasing devaluation of human life. The passage underscores the pervasive nature of human depravity, revealing a society where personal injury, however minor, is met with extreme and unchecked retribution, directly contrasting with God's measured justice and the sanctity of life established at creation. Lamech's actions, including his polygamy, paint a picture of a world spiraling into moral chaos, setting the stage for the divine judgment of the Flood.

Reflection and Application

Lamech's chilling declaration stands as a timeless cautionary tale, exposing the insidious nature of unchecked anger, the human propensity for disproportionate vengeance, and the destructive spiral of sin when left unaddressed. His boastful response to a minor injury serves as a stark reminder that bitterness and a desire for retribution, if allowed to fester, can lead to profound moral decay and a complete disregard for the sanctity of human life. For us today, this narrative challenges us to deeply examine our own hearts for any seeds of resentment, unforgiveness, or the impulse to retaliate. It compels us to confront our natural inclination towards self-vindication and instead embrace a path of reconciliation, forgiveness, and entrusting ultimate justice to God. True peace and spiritual flourishing are found not in exacting vengeance, but in extending grace and relying on divine justice, breaking the cycle of hurt and retaliation that Lamech so tragically exemplified.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does Lamech's boastful attitude about violence challenge our own understanding of justice and retribution?
  2. In what ways might we, in our own lives, be tempted to respond disproportionately to perceived hurts or offenses?
  3. How does this passage highlight the importance of forgiveness and releasing our desire for personal vengeance?
  4. What are the societal consequences when individuals or groups take justice into their own hands without restraint?

FAQ

Who was Lamech in the biblical narrative?

Lamech was a direct descendant of Cain, belonging to the seventh generation from Adam through Cain's lineage. He is notable as the first recorded polygamist in the Bible and for his boastful declaration of murder and disproportionate vengeance, which marks a significant escalation of sin in the antediluvian world.

What does "to my wounding" or "to my hurt" imply about Lamech's actions?

The Hebrew preposition le- (translated "to" or "for") in these phrases indicates a causal or consequential relationship. It implies that Lamech killed someone because that person had wounded or hurt him. Given the context, particularly the following verse (Genesis 4:24), it strongly suggests a disproportionate and boastful act of vengeance rather than a necessary act of self-defense. Lamech's response far exceeded the perceived provocation.

How does Lamech's act relate to Cain's murder of Abel?

Lamech's act marks a disturbing escalation of the sin introduced by Cain. While Cain murdered Abel out of jealousy and anger, Lamech boasts of killing for a perceived injury, and he declares a far greater vengeance for himself (seventy-sevenfold) than God promised for Cain (sevenfold). This demonstrates humanity's accelerating moral decline and the unchecked growth of violence and self-righteousness.

Does this verse condemn polygamy?

While not an explicit condemnation, Lamech's polygamy (the first mentioned in Scripture) is presented within the context of a lineage marked by increasing sin and violence. It stands in stark contrast to God's original design for marriage (one man, one woman) established in Genesis 2:24. The narrative implicitly portrays polygamy as part of the broader moral corruption and deviation from divine order that characterized the pre-Flood world, rather than a positive development.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Lamech's chilling declaration of seventy-sevenfold vengeance vividly illustrates the profound brokenness of humanity and the escalating, self-perpetuating cycle of sin and retaliation that characterizes a world alienated from God. This desperate human need for a different kind of justice and a radical ethic of forgiveness finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Where Lamech demands disproportionate retribution, Christ teaches his followers to turn the other cheek and to forgive not merely seven times, but seventy-seven times. His life, death, and resurrection fundamentally break the ancient cycle of vengeance, offering divine mercy and the path to true reconciliation with God and with one another. Christ's sacrifice on the cross is the ultimate act of both justice and mercy, absorbing the full wrath of God against sin and providing a way for humanity to be reconciled to God, rather than perpetuating the endless cycle of hurt and retaliation. He is the one who makes peace by the blood of his cross, inaugurating a new covenant and a new way of living that stands in profound and redemptive contrast to Lamech's violent declaration.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Genesis 4:23–24.

1662–1714 · 2 verses
Passage under commentGenesis 4:23–24

By this speech of Lamech, which is here recorded, and probably was much talked of in those times, he further appears to have been a wicked man, as Cain's accursed race generally were. Observe, 1. How haughtily and imperiously he speaks to his wives, as one that expected a mighty regard and observance: Hear my voice, you wives of Lamech. No marvel that he who had broken one law of marriage, by taking two wives, broke another, which obliged him to be kind and tender to those he had taken, and to give honour to the wife as to the weaker vessel. Those are not always the most careful to do their own duty that are highest in their demands of respect from others, and most frequent in calling upon their relations to know their place and do their duty. 2. How bloody and barbarous he was to all about him: I have slain, or (as it is in the margin) I would slay a man in my wound, and a young man in my hurt. He owns himself a man of a fierce and cruel disposition, that would lay about him without mercy, and kill all that stood in his way; be it a man, or a young man, nay, though he himself were in danger to be wounded and hurt in the conflict. Some think, because (Gen 4:24) he compares himself with Cain, that he had murdered some of the holy seed, the true worshippers of God, and that he acknowledged this to be the wounding of his conscience and the hurt of his soul; and yet that, like Cain, he continued impenitent, trembling and yet unhumbled. Or his wives, knowing what manner of spirit he was of, how apt both to give and to resent provocation, were afraid lest somebody or other would be the death of him. "Never fear," says he, "I defy any man to set upon me; whosoever does, let me alone to make my part good with him; I will slay him, be he a man or a young man." Note, It is a common thing for fierce and bloody men to glory in their shame (Phi 3:19), as if it were both their safety and their honour that they care not how many lives are sacrificed to their angry resentments, nor how much they are hated, provided they may be feared. Oderint, dum metuant - Let them hate, provided they fear. How impiously he presumes even upon God's protection in his wicked way, Gen 4:24. He had heard that Cain should be avenged seven-fold (Gen 4:15), that is, that if any man should dare to kill Cain he should be severely reckoned with and punished for so doing, though Cain deserved to die a thousand deaths for the murder of his brother, and hence he infers that if any one should kill him for the murders he had committed God would much more avenge his death. As if the special care God took to prolong and secure the life of Cain, for special reasons peculiar to his case (and indeed for his sorer punishment, as the beings of the damned are continued) were designed as a protection to all murderers. Thus Lamech perversely argues, "If God provided for the safety of Cain, much more for mine, who, though I have slain many, yet never slew my own brother, and upon no provocation, as he did." Note, The reprieve of some sinners, and the patience God exercises towards them, are often abused to the hardening of others in the like sinful ways, Ecc 8:11. But, though justice strike some slowly, others cannot therefore be sure but that they may be taken away with a swift destruction. Or, if God should bear long with those who thus presume upon his forbearance, they do but hereby treasure up unto themselves wrath against the day of wrath.

Now this is all we have upon record in scripture concerning the family and posterity of cursed Cain, till we find them all cut off and perishing in the universal deluge.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Four Centuries of Reception

6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

6 quotes · AD 373–735
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600700

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 373Ephrem the SyrianPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON GENESIS 4.2.2-3
Some, because they think that Cain was avenged for seven generations, say that Lamech was evil, because God had said, “All flesh has corrupted its path,” and also because the wives of Lamech saw that the line of their generation would be cut off. They were giving birth not to males but to females only, for Moses said that it was “when men multiplied on the earth and daughters were born to them.” When these wives saw the plight of their generation, they became fearful and knew that the judgment decreed against Cain and his seven generations had come upon their generation. Lamech, then, in his cleverness, comforted them, saying, “I have killed a man for wounding me and a youth for striking me. Just as God caused Cain to remain so that seven generations would perish with him, so God will cause me to remain, because I have killed two, so that seventy-seven generations should die with me. Before the seventy-seven generations come, however, we will die, and through the cup of death that we taste we will escape from that punishment which, because of me, will extend to seventy-seven generations.”
AD 373Ephrem the SyrianPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON GENESIS 4.3.1-2
Still others say that Lamech, who was cunning and crafty, saw the plight of his generation: that the Sethites refused to intermingle with them because of the reproach of their father Cain, who was still alive, and that the lands would become uncultivated from the lack of plowmen and their generation would thus come to an end. Lamech, therefore, moved by zeal, killed Cain together with his one son whom he had begotten and who resembled him, lest through this one son who resembled him the memory of his shame continue through their generations. When he killed Cain, who had been like a wall between the two tribes to keep them from tyrannizing each other, Lamech said to his wives as if in secret, “A man and a youth have been killed, but take and adorn your daughters for the sons of Seth. Because of the murders that I have committed and because of the adornment and beauty of your daughters, those who refused to be married to us in the past six generations might now consent to marry with us in our generation.”
AD 379Basil of CaesareaPost-NiceneSourceLETTERS 260
Some think that Cain was destroyed by Lamech on the grounds that he lived until that time to pay the longer penalty. But this is not true. For Lamech seems to have perpetrated two murders from what he tells us. “I have killed a man and a youth”—the man for wounding and the youth for bruising. Now, a wound is one thing and a bruise another; and a man is one thing and a youth another. “For Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, but Lamech seventy times sevenfold.” It is right for me to undergo four hundred and ninety chastisements, if truly God’s judgment against Cain is just, that he should undergo seven punishments. In fact, as he did not learn to murder from another, so he did not see the murderer undergoing the penalty. But I, having before my eyes the man groaning and trembling and also the greatness of the anger of God, was not brought to my senses by the example. Therefore I deserve to pay four hundred and ninety penalties.
AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHOMILIES ON GENESIS 20.6-7
“Lamech said,” the text in fact goes on, “to his wives Ada and Sella, Listen to my voice, wives of Lamech, hearken to my words: I killed a man for wounding me, and a young man for striking me. On Cain fell sevenfold vengeance, but on Lamech seventy times sevenfold.” Apply your attention to the utmost. I beseech you, put aside all worldly thoughts and let us study these words with precision so that nothing may escape us, but rather we should proceed to their deepest meaning and be able to light upon the treasure concealed in these brief phrases. “Lamech said to his wives Ada and Sella,” the text says, “Listen to my voice, wives of Lamech, hearken to my words.” Consider at once, I ask you, from the outset how much benefit this man gained from the punishment inflicted on Cain. Not only does he not await accusation from someone else to the effect that he has been guilty of this sin or some worse one, but without anyone’s accusing him or censuring him he confesses his own guilt, admits his crimes and outlines to his wives the magnitude of his sin, as to fulfill the proverb of the inspired writer, “He who accuses himself at the beginning of the speech is in the right.” You see, confession is of the greatest efficacy for correction of faults. Thus the denial of guilt after the committing of sin proves worse than the sins themselves. This was the condition of that man who killed his brother and who when questioned by the loving God did not merely decline to confess his crime but even dared to lie to God and thus caused his life to be lengthened. Accordingly Lamech, when he fell into the same sins, arrived at the conclusion that denial would only lead to his receiving a severer punishment, and so he summoned his wives, without anyone’s accusing or charging him, and made a personal confession of his sins to them in his own words. By comparing what he had done to the crimes committed by Cain, he limited the punishment coming to him.
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceQUESTIONS ON GENESIS 44
Some interpreters understand this not of two men or, as others fantasize, of Cain, but of one and the same young man: “a man I have killed for wounding me and a young man for bruising me.” That is, a young man approaching maturity. He escapes vengeance through confession of sin, and pronouncing judgment on himself, he prevents divine judgment.
AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on Genesis (Hexaemeron)
And Lamech said to his wives Ada and Zillah: "Hear my voice, you wives of Lamech; give ear to my speech, for I have slain a man for wounding me, and a young man for bruising me." The man or young man that he mentions signifies Cain, whom the same Lamech unintentionally killed, as Jerome testifies to be written in a certain Hebrew volume. He killed him both in his wound and in his bruise, because he brought death and damnation upon himself for killing him whom God had granted life.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 4:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8