உள்ளடக்கத்திற்குச் செல்க

2 Samuel 6:9

“The Death of Uzzah”· 2 Samuel 6:6–11Read in context
King James Version
And David was afraid of the LORD that day, and said, How shall the ark of the LORD come to me?
KJV (with Strong's)
And David H1732 was afraid H3372 of the LORD H3068 that day H3117, and said H559, How shall the ark H727 of the LORD H3068 come H935 to me?
Complete Jewish Bible
David was frightened of ADONAI that day; he asked, "How can the ark of ADONAI come to me?"
Berean Standard Bible
That day David feared the LORD and asked, “How can the ark of the LORD ever come to me?”
American Standard Version
And David was afraid of Jehovah that day; and he said, How shall the ark of Jehovah come unto me?
World English Bible Messianic
David was afraid of the LORD that day; and he said, “How shall the LORD’s ark come to me?”
Geneva Bible (1599)
Therefore Dauid that day feared the Lord, and sayd, How shall the Arke of the Lord come to mee?
Young's Literal Translation
and David feareth Jehovah on that day, and saith, `How doth the ark of Jehovah come in unto me?'
தமிழ் · TCV
தாவீது அன்றையதினம் யெகோவாவுக்குப் பயந்து, “யெகோவாவின் பெட்டி எப்படி என்னிடம் வரமுடியும்?” என்று கூறினான்.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David View full PDF
The Ark Recovered
The Ark Recovered View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,167 of 31,102 · 26.3%

Study this verse

Summary

King David's profound fear and questioning in 2 Samuel 6:9 emerge directly from the tragic death of Uzzah, who was struck down for improperly touching the Ark of the Covenant. This pivotal moment reveals David's dawning realization of God's absolute holiness and the critical importance of approaching Him strictly according to His divine commands, challenging his previous, more casual understanding of sacred protocol and prompting a re-evaluation of how God's presence should be honored.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is a direct and immediate reaction to the preceding tragedy in 2 Samuel 6:6-8. David, initially filled with joyful enthusiasm as he led the procession to bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem, had overlooked the precise instructions for its transport. The sudden, divine judgment on Uzzah for touching the Ark, even with seemingly good intentions to steady it, abruptly halts the celebration and shatters David's complacency. The verse marks a dramatic shift from joyful celebration to profound fear and uncertainty, setting the stage for the Ark's temporary relocation to the house of Obed-Edom, as described in 2 Samuel 6:10-11. This pause in the narrative highlights the gravity of the event and the subsequent shift in David's understanding and approach to God's sacred presence.

Historical & Cultural Context

The Ark of the Covenant was the most sacred artifact in ancient Israel, symbolizing God's throne and His presence among His people. Its handling was governed by very specific Mosaic laws, particularly detailed in Numbers 4:15 and Exodus 25:12-15. These laws stipulated that the Ark was to be carried by poles inserted into rings, by the Levites of the Kohathite clan, and was never to be touched directly. David's initial attempt to transport the Ark on a new cart, while perhaps mirroring Philistine practices (as seen in 1 Samuel 6:7-12), was a deviation from divine command. This incident underscores the stark contrast between human expediency and divine protocol, emphasizing that God's holiness demands adherence to His revealed will, not human innovation, regardless of cultural norms.

Key Themes

The central theme emerging from this verse is the absolute holiness of God. Uzzah's death dramatically illustrates that God's sacred nature cannot be treated casually or approached on human terms. This event re-establishes the profound fear of the LORD as a necessary component of true worship and wisdom, as articulated in Proverbs 9:10. David's fear is not mere terror but a deep, reverential awe that acknowledges God's immense power and righteousness. Consequently, the verse also introduces the theme of proper worship and obedience, highlighting that God's presence must be approached with diligent adherence to His commands. David's subsequent question, "How shall the ark of the LORD come to me?", signifies a crucial shift from presumptuous action to humble inquiry, leading to a later, successful, and divinely approved transport of the Ark, as detailed in 2 Samuel 6:12-15.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Afraid yârêʼ' H3372

This term carries a dual meaning encompassing both terror and profound reverence or awe. In this context, David's fear is not merely cowering fright but a deep, respectful awe in the presence of something immensely powerful and holy. It signifies a recognition of God's unapproachable holiness and the serious consequences of treating His sacred presence lightly. This "fear of the LORD" is a foundational concept in biblical wisdom literature, denoting a right relationship with God characterized by respect, obedience, and a profound understanding of His majesty.

LORD Yᵉhôvâh' H3068

This is the covenant name of God, Yahweh, emphasizing His self-existence, eternal nature, and His personal relationship with Israel. In the context of David's fear, it underscores that the judgment came from the sovereign, covenant-keeping God Himself, not a lesser deity or impersonal force. This highlights the absolute authority and holiness of the one true God, demanding reverent worship and strict adherence to His revealed will.

Ark ʼârôwn' H727

More than just a box, the Ark of the Covenant was the central symbol of God's presence, His throne, and the place where His glory (Shekinah) resided among His people. It contained the tablets of the Law, Aaron's rod, and a pot of manna, representing God's covenant, provision, and authority. Its sacredness was paramount, directly linked to God's own holiness and His specific instructions for its handling, making any casual approach a direct affront to His divine majesty.

Verse Breakdown

"And David was afraid of the LORD that day"

This clause marks a dramatic shift in David's emotional state, from initial joy and celebration to profound fear. This fear is a direct response to God's judgment on Uzzah, demonstrating David's immediate and visceral understanding of the gravity of God's holiness. It signifies a divinely imposed realization that God is not to be trifled with, and His commands regarding sacred things are absolute.

"and said, How shall the ark of the LORD come to me?"

This rhetorical question reveals David's sudden recognition of his own inadequacy and the impropriety of his previous methods. It is a question born of humility and a desire to understand God's specific requirements for approaching His presence. It reflects a shift from human ingenuity and convenience to a desperate search for divine protocol, acknowledging that God's holy presence can only be approached on His terms, not on human presumption.

Literary Devices

The verse effectively employs Juxtaposition by contrasting David's initial celebratory demeanor with his sudden, profound fear, highlighting the dramatic impact of Uzzah's death. The rhetorical question, "How shall the ark of the LORD come to me?", serves as a powerful instance of Inquiry, not merely seeking information but expressing deep consternation and a dawning awareness of a fundamental spiritual truth. This inquiry also functions as a form of Confession, implicitly admitting a prior misunderstanding or oversight regarding God's holiness. The overall tone shifts from one of human control and celebration to one of divine sovereignty and human submission, underscoring the theme of God's unapproachable Holiness as a central, non-negotiable attribute.

Theological and Thematic Connections

This verse is a profound theological statement on the nature of God's holiness and the necessity of reverent obedience in His presence. It teaches that God is not merely a benevolent deity to be approached on human terms, but a sovereign, holy God whose commands are to be meticulously followed. The incident with Uzzah and David's subsequent fear underscore the principle that good intentions do not supersede divine instruction when it comes to sacred matters. This event served as a foundational lesson for David, shaping his understanding of worship and governance, and emphasizing that true piety involves a humble submission to God's revealed will.

Reflection and Application

David's experience in 2 Samuel 6:9 serves as a timeless reminder that our approach to God must always be characterized by reverence and obedience, not by casual familiarity or human presumption. While the physical Ark of the Covenant is no longer present, the principles of God's unchangeable holiness and the seriousness of His commands remain eternally true. We are called to approach God through Christ, recognizing His immense purity and justice, and to live lives that reflect a humble submission to His Word. Our worship, service, and daily conduct should be informed by a healthy "fear of the Lord"—a deep, reverential awe that acknowledges His supreme authority and goodness. This leads not to cowering terror, but to a profound desire to honor Him in all things, fostering a relationship built on truth, humility, and diligent obedience.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does David's fear of the LORD challenge my own understanding of God's holiness and my approach to Him in worship and daily life?
  2. In what areas of my life might I be treating God's commands or sacred principles with casualness or presumption, rather than reverent obedience?
  3. What specific steps can I take to cultivate a deeper, more healthy "fear of the Lord" that leads to wisdom and a more faithful walk with Him?

FAQ

Why was David afraid of the LORD, and what does "afraid" mean here?

David's fear was a direct response to the immediate and terrifying judgment of God on Uzzah, who died for touching the Ark of the Covenant, an act forbidden by divine law. The Hebrew word for "afraid" (יָרֵא, yârêʼ') encompasses more than just terror; it signifies a profound reverence, awe, and dread in the presence of something immensely powerful and holy. David was not merely scared of God in a cowering sense, but he was struck with a deep, respectful awe for God's absolute holiness and the serious consequences of treating His sacred presence lightly. This fear led him to acknowledge God's sovereignty and the necessity of adhering to His specific instructions.

What was the significance of the Ark of the LORD, and why was its handling so strictly regulated?

The Ark of the Covenant was the most sacred object in ancient Israel, serving as the earthly throne of God and the visible symbol of His presence among His people. It contained the covenant tablets, representing God's law and His covenant relationship with Israel. Its handling was strictly regulated by Mosaic law (e.g., Numbers 4:15) because it represented God's unapproachable holiness and purity. Any casual or unauthorized handling, even with seemingly good intentions, was an affront to God's majesty and a violation of His explicit commands, underscoring that God's presence must be approached on His terms, not human ones.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The incident in 2 Samuel 6:9, with David's fear and recognition of God's unapproachable holiness, powerfully foreshadows the New Covenant reality in Christ. Under the Old Covenant, the Ark symbolized God's presence, but it was shrouded in mystery and danger, requiring strict adherence to rituals and mediating priests. Uzzah's death vividly demonstrated that sinful humanity could not directly or casually approach a holy God. However, in Christ, the ultimate fulfillment of God's presence and holiness is revealed. Jesus is the true "Ark" of God, the Word made flesh who tabernacled among us, making God fully accessible. Through His perfect life, atoning death, and resurrection, Christ has opened a new and living way into the very presence of God, as Hebrews 10:19-22 proclaims. We no longer approach God with fear of immediate judgment for improper touch, but with confidence and reverence, having been made holy by the blood of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. This Christ-centered fulfillment transforms the fear of judgment into a reverent awe and worship of a God who has drawn near to us in love, enabling us to approach His throne of grace with boldness, as Hebrews 4:16 encourages.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Samuel 6:6–11. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 6 verses
Passage under comment2 Samuel 6:6–11
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here Uzzah struck dead for touching the ark, when it was upon its journey towards the city of David, a sad providence, which damped their mirth, stopped the progress of the ark, and for the present, dispersed this great assembly, which had come together to attend it, and sent them home in a fright.

I.Uzzah's offence seems very small.

He and his brother Ahio, the sons of Abinadab, in whose house the ark had long been lodged, having been used to attend it, to show their willingness to prefer the public benefit to their own private honour and advantage, undertook to drive the cart in which the ark was carried, this being perhaps the last service they were likely to do it; for others would be employed about it when it came to the city of David. Ahio went before, to clear the way, and, if need were, to lead the oxen. Uzzah followed close to the side of the cart. It happened that the oxen shook it, Sa2 6:6. The critics are not agreed about the signification of the original word: They stumbled (so our margin); they kicked (so some), perhaps against the goad with which Uzzah drove them; they stuck in the mire, by some. By some accident or other the ark was in danger of being overthrown. Uzzah thereupon laid hold of it, to save it from falling, we have reason to think with a very good intention, to preserve the reputation of the ark and to prevent a bad omen. Yet this was his crime. Uzzah was a Levite, but priests only might touch the ark. The law was express concerning the Kohathites, that, though they were to carry the ark by the staves, yet they must not touch any holy thing, lest they die, Num 4:15. Uzzah's long familiarity with the ark, and the constant attendance he had given to it, might occasion his presumption, but would not excuse it.

II.His punishment for this offence seems very great (Sa2 6:7):

The anger of the Lord was kindled against him (for in sacred things he is a jealous God) and he smote him there for his rashness, as the word is, and struck him dead upon the spot. There he sinned, and there he died, by the ark of God; even the mercy-seat would not save him. Why was God thus severe with him?

1.The touching of the ark was forbidden to the Levites expressly under pain of death - lest they die; and God, by this instance of severity, would show how he might justly have dealt with our first parents, when they had eaten that which was forbidden under the same penalty - lest you die.

2.God saw the presumption and irreverence of Uzzah's heart. Perhaps he affected to show, before this great assembly, how bold he could make with the ark, having been so long acquainted with it. Familiarity, even with that which is most awful, is apt to breed contempt.

3.David afterwards owned that Uzzah died for an error they were all guilty of, which was carrying the ark in a cart. Because it was not carried on the Levites' shoulders, the Lord made that breach upon us, Ch1 15:13. But Uzzah was singled out to be made an example, perhaps because he had been most forward in advising that way of conveyance; however he had fallen into another error, which was occasioned by that. Perhaps the ark was not covered, as it should have been, with the covering of badgers' skins (Num 4:6), and that was a further provocation.

4.God would hereby strike an awe upon the thousands of Israel, would convince them that the ark was never the less venerable for its having been so long in mean circumstances, and thus he would teach them to rejoice with trembling, and always to treat holy things with reverence and holy fear.

5.God would hereby teach us that a good intention will not justify a bad action; it will not suffice to say of that which is ill done that it was well meant. He will let us know that he can and will secure his ark, and needs not any man's sin to help him to do it.

6.If it was so great a crime for one to lay hold on the ark of the covenant that had no right to do so, what is it for those to lay claim to the privileges of the covenant that come not up to the terms of it? To the wicked God says, What hast thou to do to take my covenant in thy mouth? Psa 50:16. Friend, how camest thou in hither? If the ark was so sacred, and not to be touched irreverently, what is the blood of the covenant? Heb 10:29.

III.David's feelings on the infliction of this stroke were keen, and perhaps not altogether as they should have been.

He should have humbled himself under God's hand, confessed his error, acknowledged God's righteousness, and deprecated the further tokens of his displeasure, and then have gone on with the good work he had in hand. But we find,

1.He was displeased. It is not said because Uzzah had affronted God, but because God had made a breach upon Uzzah (Sa2 6:8): David's anger was kindled. It is the same word that is used for God's displeasure, Sa2 6:7. Because God was angry, David was angry and out of humour. As if God might not assert the honour of his ark, and frown upon one that touched it rudely, without asking David leave. Shall mortal man pretend to be more just than God, arraign his proceedings, or charge him with iniquity? David did not now act like himself, like a man after God's own heart. It is not for us to be displeased at any thing that God does, how unpleasing soever it is to us. The death of Uzzah was indeed an eclipse to the glory of a solemnity which David valued himself upon more than any thing else, and might give birth to some speculations among those that were disaffected to him, as if God were departing from him too; but he ought nevertheless to have subscribed to the righteousness and wisdom of God in it, and not to have been displeased at it. When we lie under God's anger we must keep under our own.

2.He was afraid, Sa2 6:9. It should seem he was afraid with amazement; for he said, How shall the ark of the Lord come to me? As if God sought advantages against all that were about him, and was so extremely tender of his ark that there was no dealing with it; and therefore better for him to keep it at a distance. Que procul a Jove, procul a fulmine - To retire from Jove is to retire from the thunder-bolt. He should rather have said, "Let the ark come to me, and I will take warning by this to treat it with more reverence." Provoke me not (says God, Jer 25:6) and I will do you no hurt. Or this may be looked upon as a good use which David made of this tremendous judgment. He did not say, "Surely Uzzah was a sinner above all men, because he suffered such things," but is concerned for himself, as one conscious, not only of his own unworthiness of God's favour, but his obnoxiousness to God's displeasure. "God might justly strike me dead as he did Uzzah. My flesh trembles for fear of thee," Psa 119:120. This God intends in his judgments, that others may hear and fear. David therefore will not bring the ark into his own city (Sa2 6:10) till he is better prepared for its reception.

3.He took care to perpetuate the remembrance of this stroke by a new name he gave to the place: Perez-uzzah, the breach of Uzzah, Sa2 6:8. He had been lately triumphing in the breach made upon his enemies, and called the place Baal-perazim, a place of breaches. But here is a breach upon his friends. When we see one breach, we should consider that we know not where the next will be. The memorial of this stroke would be a warning to posterity to take heed of all rashness and irreverence in dealing about holy things; for God will be sanctified in those that come nigh unto him.

4.He lodged the ark in a good house, the house of Obed-edom a Levite, which happened to be near the place where this disaster happened, and there, (1.) It was kindly entertained and welcomed, and continued there three months, Sa2 6:10, Sa2 6:11. Obed-edom knew what slaughter the ark had made among the Philistines that imprisoned it and the Bethshemites that looked into it. He saw Uzzah struck dead for touching it, and perceived that David himself was afraid of meddling with it; yet he cheerfully invites it to his own house, and opens his doors to it without fear, knowing it was a savour of death unto death only to those that treated it ill. "O the courage," says bishop Hall, "of an honest and faithful heart! nothing can make God otherwise than amiable to his own people: even his very justice is lovely." (2.) It paid well for its entertainment: The Lord blessed Obed-edom and all his household. The same hand that punished Uzzah's proud presumption rewarded Obed-edom's humble boldness, and made the ark to him a savour of life unto life. Let none think the worse of the gospel for the judgements inflicted on those that reject it, but set in opposition to them the blessings it brings to those that duly receive it. None ever had, nor ever shall have, reason to say that it is in vain to serve God. Let masters of families be encouraged to keep up religion in their families, and to serve God and the interests of his kingdom with their houses and estates, for that is the way to bring a blessing upon all they have. The ark is a guest which none shall lose by that bid it welcome. Josephus says that, whereas before Obed-edom was poor, on a sudden, in these three months, his estate increased, to the envy of his neighbours. Piety is the best friend to prosperity. In wisdom's left hand are riches and honour. His household shared in the blessing. It is good living in a family that entertains the ark, for all about it will fare the better for it.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.

1 quote · AD 420
AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceAgainst the Pelagians 1.33
When the ark of the Lord was being transferred to Jerusalem, and the oxen kicked and made the wagon lean to one side, Uzzah, the Levite, reached out his hand to support the ark that had been tipped, and there follow immediately these words: “And the indignation of the Lord was enkindled against Uzzah, and God struck him there for his ignorance, and he died before the ark of God. And David was grieved because the Lord had struck Uzzah, and he was afraid of the Lord that day and said, ‘How shall the ark of the Lord come to me?’ ” When David, who was a just man and a prophet and had been anointed as king, whom the Lord chose according to his own heart that he might do his will in all things, saw ignorance punished by the wrath of the Lord, he was afraid and was grieved; nor did he ask the Lord his reason for striking a man who was ignorant, but he feared a similar judgment happening to him.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Samuel 6:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8