2 Samuel 6:8

Translation
King James Version
And David was displeased, because the LORD had made a breach upon Uzzah: and he called the name of the place Perezuzzah to this day.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And David H1732 was displeased H2734, because the LORD H3068 had made H6555 a breach H6556 upon Uzzah H5798: and he called H7121 the name of the place H4725 Perezuzzah H6560 to this day H3117.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
It upset David that ADONAI had broken out against 'Uzah; that place has been called Peretz-'Uzah [breaking-out of 'Uzah] ever since.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then David became angry because the LORD had burst forth against Uzzah; so he named that place Perez-uzzah, as it is called to this day.
Ask
American Standard Version
And David was displeased, because Jehovah had broken forth upon Uzzah; and he called that place Perez-uzzah, unto this day.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
David was displeased, because the LORD had broken out against Uzzah; and he called that place Perez Uzzah, to this day.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Dauid was displeased, because the Lord had smitten Vzzah: and he called the name of the place Perez Vzzah vntill this day.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And it is displeasing to David, because that Jehovah hath broken forth a breach upon Uzzah, and one calleth that place Perez-Uzzah, unto this day;
Ask
See also
Jonah 4:11 Chronicles 13:111 Chronicles 13:12Jonah 4:9
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David View full PDF
The Ark Recovered
The Ark Recovered View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,166 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

2 Samuel 6:8 captures King David's profound and complex emotional response to the divine judgment meted out to Uzzah, who was struck dead for touching the Ark of the Covenant. David's reaction, described as "displeasure"—a potent mixture of anger, grief, and fear—culminated in his naming of the tragic site "Perezuzzah," meaning "breach of Uzzah." This pivotal and sobering event abruptly halted the Ark's journey to Jerusalem, serving as a stark and enduring reminder of God's absolute holiness, the non-negotiable necessity of strict obedience to His commands regarding sacred things, and the profound reverence required when encountering divine presence.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within the narrative of David's reign, specifically detailing his second, and initially flawed, attempt to bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem. The preceding verses, 2 Samuel 6:1-7, vividly describe the joyous procession from Abinadab's house, the use of a new cart (a method explicitly not prescribed by divine law), and the sudden, tragic moment when Uzzah, in an attempt to steady the Ark, touched it and was immediately struck down by God. This incident serves as a dramatic interruption to David's celebration, directly preceding his subsequent fear and decision to divert the Ark to the house of Obed-Edom, as detailed in 2 Samuel 6:9-11. The narrative then contrasts this initial failure and its severe consequences with the later, successful, and divinely approved transport of the Ark to Jerusalem, underscoring the profound lessons learned through this divine intervention.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Ark of the Covenant was the preeminent sacred object in ancient Israel, symbolizing God's throne, His active presence among His people, and the very heart of the covenant relationship. Its construction, handling, and transportation were meticulously detailed in the Mosaic Law, particularly in Exodus 25:10-22 and Numbers 4:15. These instructions explicitly stated that the Ark was to be carried by Levites of the Kohathite clan using poles inserted through rings on its sides, and that direct contact was strictly forbidden on pain of death. David's decision to transport the Ark on a new cart, while perhaps drawing from the Philistine method of returning the Ark after its capture (1 Samuel 6:7-11), fundamentally disregarded the specific divine commands given to Israel. In the broader ancient Near Eastern context, sacred objects and divine presence were often approached with extreme caution and reverence, and violations of cultic purity or divine protocol were frequently met with severe consequences, thus underscoring the gravity of Uzzah's transgression within this prevailing cultural and religious framework.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within 2 Samuel and the broader biblical narrative. It vividly illustrates the theme of God's absolute holiness and sovereignty, demonstrating unequivocally that God's sacred presence cannot be approached or handled presumptuously, carelessly, or according to human innovation, but only on His precise terms. The immediate and severe judgment on Uzzah underscores the consequences of disobedience, even when human intentions may seem benign or well-meaning, thereby reinforcing the critical importance of adhering to God's revealed will over human logic, expediency, or emotional impulse. Furthermore, David's complex reaction of "displeasure" (a term encompassing anger, grief, and fear) introduces the theme of human response to divine judgment, highlighting the sobering reality of God's justice and the profound reverence required when encountering His power. This moment forces David to re-evaluate his approach to worship and governance, setting the stage for a deeper understanding of true worship and the establishment of the Davidic covenant later in the book, as seen in 2 Samuel 7.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • displeased (Hebrew, ḥārāh', H2734): This primitive root often describes intense anger, burning indignation, or a glow of heat, as seen in Genesis 4:5. In this context, it signifies a strong, complex emotional reaction from David, likely a mixture of anger at the sudden disruption and tragedy, grief over Uzzah's death, and perhaps even frustration or fear directed at the LORD for the severity of the judgment. This "displeasure" quickly transitions into profound fear in the subsequent verse, 2 Samuel 6:9.
  • breach (Hebrew, pereṣ', H6556): Derived from the root "to break out," this noun literally means "a breaking forth," "bursting out," or "breach." It denotes a sudden, violent, and decisive act of God's judgment, emphasizing the immediate and forceful nature of Uzzah's death. The word implies an uncontainable eruption of divine power against an offense, creating a permanent rupture or gap between the offender and life.
  • Perezuzzah (Hebrew, Pereṣ ʿUzzâ', H6560): This is a compound name formed from "breach" (pereṣ) and "Uzzah." It literally translates to "the breach of Uzzah" or "the bursting forth against Uzzah." David's naming of the place serves as a perpetual memorial, a stark and enduring reminder of the divine judgment and the severe consequences of violating God's holiness, ensuring that the event and its profound lesson would not be forgotten by future generations.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And David was displeased": This phrase captures the immediate and intense emotional upheaval experienced by King David. His initial joy and celebratory spirit, described in 2 Samuel 6:5, abruptly transformed into a complex emotional state encompassing anger, sorrow, and possibly frustration or questioning of God's seemingly harsh action. This "displeasure" is a deeply human reaction to a divine act that disrupted his grand plans and brought unexpected tragedy.
  • "because the LORD had made a breach upon Uzzah": This clause explicitly attributes Uzzah's death directly to the LORD, leaving no ambiguity about its divine origin. The term "breach" signifies a sudden, violent, and decisive act of divine judgment. It underscores God's active involvement and sovereignty in the event, clarifying that Uzzah's death was not an accident but a direct, intentional consequence of violating God's specific commands regarding the Ark's handling.
  • "and he called the name of the place Perezuzzah": In ancient Near Eastern cultures, the naming of a place often served to commemorate a significant event, person, or characteristic, effectively embedding history into the landscape. David's act of naming the site "Perezuzzah" (meaning "breach of Uzzah") functions as a permanent, tangible memorial to the tragic incident. This act of naming ensures that the profound lesson of God's absolute holiness and the severity of His judgment would be perpetually remembered and serve as a solemn warning to all who passed by or heard its name.
  • "to this day": This common biblical phrase, frequently found in historical narratives, indicates that the name "Perezuzzah" (or at least the vivid memory of the event associated with it) persisted long after the events described, extending to the time the book of Samuel was written. It serves as a historical marker, authenticating the narrative and emphasizing the lasting impact and enduring significance of Uzzah's death on the collective memory and understanding of Israel.

Literary Devices

The passage employs several potent literary devices to convey its profound and sobering message. Eponymous Naming is central, as David names the place Perezuzzah after the "breach" (Hebrew: pereṣ) that occurred to Uzzah, thereby creating a lasting memorial and a mnemonic device for the event's weighty significance. The abrupt and jarring shift from the initial joyous celebration described in 2 Samuel 6:5 to the sudden death and David's subsequent "displeasure" creates a powerful Juxtaposition, highlighting the stark and tragic contrast between human intentions and divine expectations. The narrative also uses Foreshadowing indirectly, as Uzzah's death serves as a solemn and severe warning that prepares David and the reader for the meticulous, reverent, and divinely prescribed approach required for the Ark's successful transfer later in the chapter, profoundly underscoring the absolute gravity of God's holiness. Finally, the phrase "to this day" functions as a Historical Marker, authenticating the narrative and emphasizing the enduring impact of the event on the collective memory and theological understanding of Israel.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

2 Samuel 6:8 stands as a profound theological statement on the very nature of God, specifically His absolute holiness, unapproachable majesty, and unwavering demand for obedience. Uzzah's death, though seemingly harsh from a human perspective, unequivocally underscores that God is not a deity to be handled casually, presumptuously, or according to human convenience or innovation. His commands, especially concerning His sacred presence and the proper forms of worship, are not arbitrary suggestions but are rooted in His perfect, transcendent character and the divine order He establishes. This event serves as a stark reminder that while God desires intimacy and fellowship with His people, this intimacy must always be approached with profound reverence, humble obedience, and a deep understanding of His awesome transcendence. It highlights the critical principle that good intentions, human zeal, or practical expediency can never supersede explicit divine instruction, and that human attempts to "help" God can be presumptuous and dangerous when they disregard His revealed will. The incident ultimately redirects David, and by extension, all of Israel, to a deeper, more reverent, and biblically informed understanding of true worship and the divine-human relationship.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The account of Uzzah's death and David's subsequent "displeasure" in 2 Samuel 6:8 serves as a timeless and profoundly sobering lesson for believers today. It directly challenges our often-casual, pragmatic, or even presumptuous approach to God and sacred things. While we live under the New Covenant of grace, the underlying principle of God's immutable holiness and the absolute necessity of approaching Him on His terms, not ours, remain constant. This passage calls us to cultivate a deep and abiding reverence for God, recognizing His infinite majesty, His unblemished purity, and the seriousness of His Word. It prompts us to critically examine our own lives: are we approaching God's truth, His church, His calling, or His commands with a casual attitude, relying on human wisdom, convenience, or expediency rather than diligent, humble obedience to His revealed will? True worship is not merely about outward enthusiasm or seemingly good intentions; it is fundamentally about humble submission to God's prescribed ways, acknowledging His absolute sovereignty and the profound privilege of His holy presence. This narrative powerfully reminds us that God is both loving and just, merciful and holy, and He unequivocally deserves our utmost respect, awe, and careful adherence to His divine instructions.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the account of Uzzah's death challenge my understanding of God's holiness, justice, and the seriousness of His commands?
  • In what specific areas of my life might I be approaching God, His Word, or His church with a casual attitude rather than with reverence and diligent obedience?
  • What is the crucial distinction between human good intentions and explicit divine instruction, and why is this difference foundational for faithful living?
  • How can I actively cultivate a deeper sense of awe, reverence, and humble submission to God in my daily walk, personal devotion, and corporate worship?

FAQ

Why was Uzzah's punishment so severe for seemingly trying to help?

Answer: Uzzah's punishment was severe because his action, though perhaps well-intentioned from a human perspective, directly violated God's explicit and long-standing commands regarding the handling of the Ark of the Covenant. The Mosaic Law, particularly in Numbers 4:15, strictly prohibited anyone, even Levites, from touching the Ark; it was to be carried only by Levites of the Kohathite clan using poles inserted through rings, lest they die. The Ark symbolized God's holy presence and His throne, and any unauthorized contact was considered a defilement and a profound disrespect for His holiness and authority. God's severity underscored the absolute necessity of obedience to His precise instructions, especially concerning sacred things, and served as a powerful, immediate lesson to Israel about His unapproachable majesty and the dangers of treating His holiness lightly. This incident reinforced that God's ways are not human ways, and His commands are not mere suggestions; they are divine mandates reflecting His perfect character.

What does David's "displeasure" signify?

Answer: David's "displeasure" (Hebrew: ḥārāh) is a complex and multifaceted emotional response, indicating far more than simple sadness or disappointment. It likely encompassed a potent mixture of anger that his joyous and grand procession was abruptly halted by tragedy, profound grief over Uzzah's sudden and violent death, and perhaps even frustration or questioning directed at the LORD for the seemingly harsh severity of the judgment. It's also possible he felt anger at himself for the miscalculation or oversight in how the Ark was being transported. This initial displeasure quickly transitioned into a profound fear of the LORD, as explicitly seen in 2 Samuel 6:9, leading him to question whether he was worthy or even able to bring the Ark into his city. It reveals a deeply human reaction to a divine act that disrupted his plans and brought unexpected judgment, forcing him to confront the awesome, fearsome, and utterly holy aspect of God's character.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic event at Perezuzzah, recorded in 2 Samuel 6:8, profoundly highlights the unapproachable holiness of God under the Old Covenant, where direct access to His presence, symbolized by the Ark, was restricted and perilous for sinful humanity. The Ark of the Covenant, representing God's dwelling place among His people, could only be approached with meticulous adherence to divine law, and even then, only by authorized priests. This strictness and the severe consequences for disobedience powerfully foreshadow the ultimate solution to humanity's inherent separation from a holy God: the coming of Jesus Christ. Through Christ, the ultimate Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, who offered Himself as the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice for sin, the "breach" between God and humanity has been permanently and perfectly mended. The New Testament teaches that believers now have bold and confident access to God's very throne of grace, not through human effort, ritualistic purity, or fear of judgment, but solely through the precious blood of Jesus. He is our Great High Priest who has entered the true heavenly sanctuary, making it possible for us to draw near to God with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith. Thus, what was a terrifying, impassable barrier in the Old Covenant is now an open, gracious invitation in Christ, emphasizing that while God's holiness remains absolute, His boundless grace in Christ has provided the perfect means for reconciliation and intimate fellowship, fulfilling the deepest longing for His presence in a way Uzzah's generation could only dimly perceive.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Samuel 6 verses 6–11

We have here Uzzah struck dead for touching the ark, when it was upon its journey towards the city of David, a sad providence, which damped their mirth, stopped the progress of the ark, and for the present, dispersed this great assembly, which had come together to attend it, and sent them home in a fright.

I. Uzzah's offence seems very small. He and his brother Ahio, the sons of Abinadab, in whose house the ark had long been lodged, having been used to attend it, to show their willingness to prefer the public benefit to their own private honour and advantage, undertook to drive the cart in which the ark was carried, this being perhaps the last service they were likely to do it; for others would be employed about it when it came to the city of David. Ahio went before, to clear the way, and, if need were, to lead the oxen. Uzzah followed close to the side of the cart. It happened that the oxen shook it, Sa2 6:6. The critics are not agreed about the signification of the original word: They stumbled (so our margin); they kicked (so some), perhaps against the goad with which Uzzah drove them; they stuck in the mire, by some. By some accident or other the ark was in danger of being overthrown. Uzzah thereupon laid hold of it, to save it from falling, we have reason to think with a very good intention, to preserve the reputation of the ark and to prevent a bad omen. Yet this was his crime. Uzzah was a Levite, but priests only might touch the ark. The law was express concerning the Kohathites, that, though they were to carry the ark by the staves, yet they must not touch any holy thing, lest they die, Num 4:15. Uzzah's long familiarity with the ark, and the constant attendance he had given to it, might occasion his presumption, but would not excuse it.

II. His punishment for this offence seems very great (Sa2 6:7): The anger of the Lord was kindled against him (for in sacred things he is a jealous God) and he smote him there for his rashness, as the word is, and struck him dead upon the spot. There he sinned, and there he died, by the ark of God; even the mercy-seat would not save him. Why was God thus severe with him? 1. The touching of the ark was forbidden to the Levites expressly under pain of death - lest they die; and God, by this instance of severity, would show how he might justly have dealt with our first parents, when they had eaten that which was forbidden under the same penalty - lest you die. 2. God saw the presumption and irreverence of Uzzah's heart. Perhaps he affected to show, before this great assembly, how bold he could make with the ark, having been so long acquainted with it. Familiarity, even with that which is most awful, is apt to breed contempt. 3. David afterwards owned that Uzzah died for an error they were all guilty of, which was carrying the ark in a cart. Because it was not carried on the Levites' shoulders, the Lord made that breach upon us, Ch1 15:13. But Uzzah was singled out to be made an example, perhaps because he had been most forward in advising that way of conveyance; however he had fallen into another error, which was occasioned by that. Perhaps the ark was not covered, as it should have been, with the covering of badgers' skins (Num 4:6), and that was a further provocation. 4. God would hereby strike an awe upon the thousands of Israel, would convince them that the ark was never the less venerable for its having been so long in mean circumstances, and thus he would teach them to rejoice with trembling, and always to treat holy things with reverence and holy fear. 5. God would hereby teach us that a good intention will not justify a bad action; it will not suffice to say of that which is ill done that it was well meant. He will let us know that he can and will secure his ark, and needs not any man's sin to help him to do it. 6. If it was so great a crime for one to lay hold on the ark of the covenant that had no right to do so, what is it for those to lay claim to the privileges of the covenant that come not up to the terms of it? To the wicked God says, What hast thou to do to take my covenant in thy mouth? Psa 50:16. Friend, how camest thou in hither? If the ark was so sacred, and not to be touched irreverently, what is the blood of the covenant? Heb 10:29.

III. David's feelings on the infliction of this stroke were keen, and perhaps not altogether as they should have been. He should have humbled himself under God's hand, confessed his error, acknowledged God's righteousness, and deprecated the further tokens of his displeasure, and then have gone on with the good work he had in hand. But we find, 1. He was displeased. It is not said because Uzzah had affronted God, but because God had made a breach upon Uzzah (Sa2 6:8): David's anger was kindled. It is the same word that is used for God's displeasure, Sa2 6:7. Because God was angry, David was angry and out of humour. As if God might not assert the honour of his ark, and frown upon one that touched it rudely, without asking David leave. Shall mortal man pretend to be more just than God, arraign his proceedings, or charge him with iniquity? David did not now act like himself, like a man after God's own heart. It is not for us to be displeased at any thing that God does, how unpleasing soever it is to us. The death of Uzzah was indeed an eclipse to the glory of a solemnity which David valued himself upon more than any thing else, and might give birth to some speculations among those that were disaffected to him, as if God were departing from him too; but he ought nevertheless to have subscribed to the righteousness and wisdom of God in it, and not to have been displeased at it. When we lie under God's anger we must keep under our own. 2. He was afraid, Sa2 6:9. It should seem he was afraid with amazement; for he said, How shall the ark of the Lord come to me? As if God sought advantages against all that were about him, and was so extremely tender of his ark that there was no dealing with it; and therefore better for him to keep it at a distance. Que procul a Jove, procul a fulmine - To retire from Jove is to retire from the thunder-bolt. He should rather have said, "Let the ark come to me, and I will take warning by this to treat it with more reverence." Provoke me not (says God, Jer 25:6) and I will do you no hurt. Or this may be looked upon as a good use which David made of this tremendous judgment. He did not say, "Surely Uzzah was a sinner above all men, because he suffered such things," but is concerned for himself, as one conscious, not only of his own unworthiness of God's favour, but his obnoxiousness to God's displeasure. "God might justly strike me dead as he did Uzzah. My flesh trembles for fear of thee," Psa 119:120. This God intends in his judgments, that others may hear and fear. David therefore will not bring the ark into his own city (Sa2 6:10) till he is better prepared for its reception. 3. He took care to perpetuate the remembrance of this stroke by a new name he gave to the place: Perez-uzzah, the breach of Uzzah, Sa2 6:8. He had been lately triumphing in the breach made upon his enemies, and called the place Baal-perazim, a place of breaches. But here is a breach upon his friends. When we see one breach, we should consider that we know not where the next will be. The memorial of this stroke would be a warning to posterity to take heed of all rashness and irreverence in dealing about holy things; for God will be sanctified in those that come nigh unto him. 4. He lodged the ark in a good house, the house of Obed-edom a Levite, which happened to be near the place where this disaster happened, and there, (1.) It was kindly entertained and welcomed, and continued there three months, Sa2 6:10, Sa2 6:11. Obed-edom knew what slaughter the ark had made among the Philistines that imprisoned it and the Bethshemites that looked into it. He saw Uzzah struck dead for touching it, and perceived that David himself was afraid of meddling with it; yet he cheerfully invites it to his own house, and opens his doors to it without fear, knowing it was a savour of death unto death only to those that treated it ill. "O the courage," says bishop Hall, "of an honest and faithful heart! nothing can make God otherwise than amiable to his own people: even his very justice is lovely." (2.) It paid well for its entertainment: The Lord blessed Obed-edom and all his household. The same hand that punished Uzzah's proud presumption rewarded Obed-edom's humble boldness, and made the ark to him a savour of life unto life. Let none think the worse of the gospel for the judgements inflicted on those that reject it, but set in opposition to them the blessings it brings to those that duly receive it. None ever had, nor ever shall have, reason to say that it is in vain to serve God. Let masters of families be encouraged to keep up religion in their families, and to serve God and the interests of his kingdom with their houses and estates, for that is the way to bring a blessing upon all they have. The ark is a guest which none shall lose by that bid it welcome. Josephus says that, whereas before Obed-edom was poor, on a sudden, in these three months, his estate increased, to the envy of his neighbours. Piety is the best friend to prosperity. In wisdom's left hand are riches and honour. His household shared in the blessing. It is good living in a family that entertains the ark, for all about it will fare the better for it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–11. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Against the Pelagians 1.33
When the ark of the Lord was being transferred to Jerusalem, and the oxen kicked and made the wagon lean to one side, Uzzah, the Levite, reached out his hand to support the ark that had been tipped, and there follow immediately these words: “And the indignation of the Lord was enkindled against Uzzah, and God struck him there for his ignorance, and he died before the ark of God. And David was grieved because the Lord had struck Uzzah, and he was afraid of the Lord that day and said, ‘How shall the ark of the Lord come to me?’ ” When David, who was a just man and a prophet and had been anointed as king, whom the Lord chose according to his own heart that he might do his will in all things, saw ignorance punished by the wrath of the Lord, he was afraid and was grieved; nor did he ask the Lord his reason for striking a man who was ignorant, but he feared a similar judgment happening to him.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Samuel 6:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.