TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Samuel 6:6–11. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here Uzzah struck dead for touching the ark, when it was upon its journey towards the city of David, a sad providence, which damped their mirth, stopped the progress of the ark, and for the present, dispersed this great assembly, which had come together to attend it, and sent them home in a fright.
I.Uzzah's offence seems very small.
He and his brother Ahio, the sons of Abinadab, in whose house the ark had long been lodged, having been used to attend it, to show their willingness to prefer the public benefit to their own private honour and advantage, undertook to drive the cart in which the ark was carried, this being perhaps the last service they were likely to do it; for others would be employed about it when it came to the city of David. Ahio went before, to clear the way, and, if need were, to lead the oxen. Uzzah followed close to the side of the cart. It happened that the oxen shook it, Sa2 6:6. The critics are not agreed about the signification of the original word: They stumbled (so our margin); they kicked (so some), perhaps against the goad with which Uzzah drove them; they stuck in the mire, by some. By some accident or other the ark was in danger of being overthrown. Uzzah thereupon laid hold of it, to save it from falling, we have reason to think with a very good intention, to preserve the reputation of the ark and to prevent a bad omen. Yet this was his crime. Uzzah was a Levite, but priests only might touch the ark. The law was express concerning the Kohathites, that, though they were to carry the ark by the staves, yet they must not touch any holy thing, lest they die, Num 4:15. Uzzah's long familiarity with the ark, and the constant attendance he had given to it, might occasion his presumption, but would not excuse it.
II.His punishment for this offence seems very great (Sa2 6:7):
The anger of the Lord was kindled against him (for in sacred things he is a jealous God) and he smote him there for his rashness, as the word is, and struck him dead upon the spot. There he sinned, and there he died, by the ark of God; even the mercy-seat would not save him. Why was God thus severe with him?
1.The touching of the ark was forbidden to the Levites expressly under pain of death - lest they die; and God, by this instance of severity, would show how he might justly have dealt with our first parents, when they had eaten that which was forbidden under the same penalty - lest you die.
2.God saw the presumption and irreverence of Uzzah's heart. Perhaps he affected to show, before this great assembly, how bold he could make with the ark, having been so long acquainted with it. Familiarity, even with that which is most awful, is apt to breed contempt.
3.David afterwards owned that Uzzah died for an error they were all guilty of, which was carrying the ark in a cart. Because it was not carried on the Levites' shoulders, the Lord made that breach upon us, Ch1 15:13. But Uzzah was singled out to be made an example, perhaps because he had been most forward in advising that way of conveyance; however he had fallen into another error, which was occasioned by that. Perhaps the ark was not covered, as it should have been, with the covering of badgers' skins (Num 4:6), and that was a further provocation.
4.God would hereby strike an awe upon the thousands of Israel, would convince them that the ark was never the less venerable for its having been so long in mean circumstances, and thus he would teach them to rejoice with trembling, and always to treat holy things with reverence and holy fear.
5.God would hereby teach us that a good intention will not justify a bad action; it will not suffice to say of that which is ill done that it was well meant. He will let us know that he can and will secure his ark, and needs not any man's sin to help him to do it.
6.If it was so great a crime for one to lay hold on the ark of the covenant that had no right to do so, what is it for those to lay claim to the privileges of the covenant that come not up to the terms of it? To the wicked God says, What hast thou to do to take my covenant in thy mouth? Psa 50:16. Friend, how camest thou in hither? If the ark was so sacred, and not to be touched irreverently, what is the blood of the covenant? Heb 10:29.
III.David's feelings on the infliction of this stroke were keen, and perhaps not altogether as they should have been.
He should have humbled himself under God's hand, confessed his error, acknowledged God's righteousness, and deprecated the further tokens of his displeasure, and then have gone on with the good work he had in hand. But we find,
1.He was displeased. It is not said because Uzzah had affronted God, but because God had made a breach upon Uzzah (Sa2 6:8): David's anger was kindled. It is the same word that is used for God's displeasure, Sa2 6:7. Because God was angry, David was angry and out of humour. As if God might not assert the honour of his ark, and frown upon one that touched it rudely, without asking David leave. Shall mortal man pretend to be more just than God, arraign his proceedings, or charge him with iniquity? David did not now act like himself, like a man after God's own heart. It is not for us to be displeased at any thing that God does, how unpleasing soever it is to us. The death of Uzzah was indeed an eclipse to the glory of a solemnity which David valued himself upon more than any thing else, and might give birth to some speculations among those that were disaffected to him, as if God were departing from him too; but he ought nevertheless to have subscribed to the righteousness and wisdom of God in it, and not to have been displeased at it. When we lie under God's anger we must keep under our own.
2.He was afraid, Sa2 6:9. It should seem he was afraid with amazement; for he said, How shall the ark of the Lord come to me? As if God sought advantages against all that were about him, and was so extremely tender of his ark that there was no dealing with it; and therefore better for him to keep it at a distance. Que procul a Jove, procul a fulmine - To retire from Jove is to retire from the thunder-bolt. He should rather have said, "Let the ark come to me, and I will take warning by this to treat it with more reverence." Provoke me not (says God, Jer 25:6) and I will do you no hurt. Or this may be looked upon as a good use which David made of this tremendous judgment. He did not say, "Surely Uzzah was a sinner above all men, because he suffered such things," but is concerned for himself, as one conscious, not only of his own unworthiness of God's favour, but his obnoxiousness to God's displeasure. "God might justly strike me dead as he did Uzzah. My flesh trembles for fear of thee," Psa 119:120. This God intends in his judgments, that others may hear and fear. David therefore will not bring the ark into his own city (Sa2 6:10) till he is better prepared for its reception.
3.He took care to perpetuate the remembrance of this stroke by a new name he gave to the place: Perez-uzzah, the breach of Uzzah, Sa2 6:8. He had been lately triumphing in the breach made upon his enemies, and called the place Baal-perazim, a place of breaches. But here is a breach upon his friends. When we see one breach, we should consider that we know not where the next will be. The memorial of this stroke would be a warning to posterity to take heed of all rashness and irreverence in dealing about holy things; for God will be sanctified in those that come nigh unto him.
4.He lodged the ark in a good house, the house of Obed-edom a Levite, which happened to be near the place where this disaster happened, and there, (1.) It was kindly entertained and welcomed, and continued there three months, Sa2 6:10, Sa2 6:11. Obed-edom knew what slaughter the ark had made among the Philistines that imprisoned it and the Bethshemites that looked into it. He saw Uzzah struck dead for touching it, and perceived that David himself was afraid of meddling with it; yet he cheerfully invites it to his own house, and opens his doors to it without fear, knowing it was a savour of death unto death only to those that treated it ill. "O the courage," says bishop Hall, "of an honest and faithful heart! nothing can make God otherwise than amiable to his own people: even his very justice is lovely." (2.) It paid well for its entertainment: The Lord blessed Obed-edom and all his household. The same hand that punished Uzzah's proud presumption rewarded Obed-edom's humble boldness, and made the ark to him a savour of life unto life. Let none think the worse of the gospel for the judgements inflicted on those that reject it, but set in opposition to them the blessings it brings to those that duly receive it. None ever had, nor ever shall have, reason to say that it is in vain to serve God. Let masters of families be encouraged to keep up religion in their families, and to serve God and the interests of his kingdom with their houses and estates, for that is the way to bring a blessing upon all they have. The ark is a guest which none shall lose by that bid it welcome. Josephus says that, whereas before Obed-edom was poor, on a sudden, in these three months, his estate increased, to the envy of his neighbours. Piety is the best friend to prosperity. In wisdom's left hand are riches and honour. His household shared in the blessing. It is good living in a family that entertains the ark, for all about it will fare the better for it.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
When the people of the Hebrews were bringing back the ark of the Lord to Jerusalem, Uzzah, from the house of Abinadab the Israelite, who had touched the side of the ark without having examined his conscience, was slain. And yet he had drawn near not to take anything from it but to hold it up when it was leaning because of the stumbling of a young ox. So great a concern was there of reverence toward God that God did not accept bold hands even out of help. The Lord also proclaims the same thing, saying, “Everyone who is clean shall eat of the flesh, and whichever soul touches the flesh of the sacrifice of well-being and has his uncleanness upon him, that soul shall be cut off from his people.” Are these things which existed long ago, and now they do not happen in this way? What then? Has God ceased to care for what concerns us? Has he withdrawn beyond the view of the world, and does he look down from heaven upon no one? Is his forbearance really ignorance? God forbid, you will say. Therefore he sees what we do but he waits, indeed, and endures patiently, and he grants an opportunity for repentance and holds out his own Christ to postpone [the end], so that they whom he has redeemed may not readily perish. Understand this well, you sinner: you are observed by God; you can appease him if you want to.
They [the Galatians] had, in fact, only introduced one or two commandments, circumcision and the observance of days, but he [Paul] says that the gospel was subverted, in order to show that a slight adulteration vitiates the whole. For as he who but partially pares away the image on a royal coin renders the whole spurious, so he who swerves ever so little from the pure faith soon proceeds from this to graver errors and becomes entirely corrupted. Where then are those who charge us with being contentious in separating from heretics and say that there is no real difference between us except what arises from our ambition? Let them hear Paul’s assertion, that those who had but slightly innovated, subverted the gospel. … Don’t you know that even under the old covenant, a man who gathered sticks on the sabbath, and transgressed a single commandment, and that not a great one, was punished with death? And that Uzzah, who supported the ark when on the point of being overturned, was struck suddenly dead, because he had intruded upon an office which did not pertain to him? Wherefore if to transgress the sabbath and to touch the falling ark drew down the wrath of God so signally as to deprive the offender of even a momentary respite, shall he who corrupts unutterably awe-inspiring doctrines find excuse and pardon? Assuredly not. A lack of zeal in small matters is the cause of all our calamities; and because slight errors escape fitting correction, great ones creep in. As in the body, a neglect of wounds generates fever, mortification and death; so in the soul, slight evils overlooked open the door to graver ones.
We read in the law that even those who seem to have acted lightly against the sacred commandments have, nevertheless, been punished most severely. This is that we might understand that nothing which pertains to God must be considered lightly, because even what seems to be very little in fault is made great by the injury to God. What did Uzzah, the Levite of God, do against the heavenly command when he tried to steady the tottering ark of the Lord? There was nothing on this point prescribed by the law. Yet, immediately when he steadied the ark, he was struck down. Not that he was insolent in manner or undutiful in mind. Yet he was undutiful in his very act, because he went beyond his orders.
Continue studying 2 Samuel 6:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
2 Samuel 6:7 records the immediate and fatal divine judgment upon Uzzah, who died after touching the Ark of the Covenant during King David's attempt to transport it to Jerusalem. This solemn and shocking event profoundly underscores the absolute holiness and transcendence of God, revealing the severe consequences of disregarding His explicit commands concerning sacred things and emphasizing that His presence must be approached with utmost reverence and according to His revealed will, not human presumption or well-intentioned but misguided actions.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is a pivotal moment within the broader narrative of King David's reign, specifically detailing his initial, ill-fated endeavor to bring the Ark of the Covenant from Abinadab's house in Kiriath-Jearim to Jerusalem. The preceding verses (2 Samuel 6:1-6) depict a joyous, celebratory procession, complete with music and dancing, as the Ark is placed on a new cart drawn by oxen. Uzzah's sudden death dramatically interrupts this festive atmosphere, transforming it into a scene of divine judgment and human fear. This incident immediately leads to David's frustration and fear (2 Samuel 6:8-10), causing him to halt the Ark's journey and leave it at the house of Obed-Edom. The event serves as a crucial turning point, forcing David and the entire nation of Israel to confront the true nature of God's holiness and the non-negotiable requirement of obedience to His divine protocol, ultimately paving the way for a second, successful, and divinely sanctioned attempt to transport the Ark (2 Samuel 6:12-15).
Historical & Cultural Context
The Ark of the Covenant was the preeminent sacred object in ancient Israel, serving as the tangible symbol of God's throne, His covenant presence among His people, and the very essence of their unique relationship with Yahweh. Its construction and handling were meticulously prescribed by divine mandates given through Moses, particularly in the books of Exodus and Numbers. Crucially, the Ark was to be carried exclusively on poles by the Kohathite Levites, and under no circumstances were unauthorized individuals, or even authorized ones, permitted to touch it directly, lest they die (Numbers 4:15). David's decision to transport the Ark on a new cart, while perhaps mirroring common practices for moving idols in surrounding pagan cultures and seemingly efficient, directly violated these explicit divine instructions. This method demonstrated a critical misunderstanding or disregard for the unique holiness of the God of Israel and His specific demands for worship, highlighting a dangerous presumption in approaching the divine.
Key Themes
The incident surrounding Uzzah's death powerfully illuminates several foundational theological themes. Firstly, it underscores God's absolute holiness and transcendence, emphasizing that He is utterly distinct from His creation and cannot be approached casually or on human terms. The Ark's sanctity was a constant, tangible reminder of this divine separation and the unapproachable nature of God's glory. Secondly, the passage stresses the paramount importance of obedience to God's revealed commands, even when human intentions seem good or practical. Uzzah's act, though perhaps an instinctive attempt to prevent the Ark from falling, was a direct violation of divine law, demonstrating that human wisdom or expediency cannot supersede God's explicit instructions concerning His worship and presence. Thirdly, it reveals the serious consequences of presumptuousness and disregard for divine law. God's immediate judgment serves as a stark warning against treating sacred things lightly and underscores that true worship must align with God's terms, not human convenience, reasoning, or even well-meaning impulses. This event also contributes to the broader theme of David's learning process in kingship and worship, as he grapples with understanding and honoring the Lord correctly, especially in contrast to the previous, more casual approach seen during the period of the Judges.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Derived from the root referring to the nose or nostril, 'aph' metaphorically describes the rapid breathing or flaring of the nostrils associated with intense emotion, particularly wrath. In this context, it signifies God's righteous, holy indignation—a just and immediate response to a profound violation of His sacred character and explicit commands. The "kindling" of God's anger against Uzzah denotes His swift and severe displeasure with the transgression against His holiness. This is not a capricious human emotion, but a divine attribute reflecting His perfect justice.
This primitive root denotes a decisive, often fatal, strike or blow. Here, it emphasizes the direct and intentional divine agency in Uzzah's death. His demise was not an accident or a random occurrence, but a deliberate act of judgment from God, demonstrating the immediate and tangible consequence of violating His sacred boundaries. The verb underscores the power and authority of God's judgment.
While often translated as "error" or "fault," the Hebrew term shal (H7944) signifies a "fault" or "transgression." It points to a failure to adhere to a prescribed standard or a deviation from the correct path. In Uzzah's case, his "error" was not merely a mistake but a profound transgression—a direct violation of the sacred protocol established by God for handling the Ark. It represents a fundamental disregard for divine law and the sanctity of God's presence, rather than a simple misstep.
Verse Breakdown
"And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Uzzah"
This opening clause immediately establishes the divine perspective on Uzzah's action, highlighting God's righteous indignation. The "kindling" of the LORD's anger signifies an immediate and intense displeasure, indicating that Uzzah's act was perceived by God not as a minor mishap but as a serious and direct offense against His holiness and authority.
"and God smote him there for [his] error"
This segment specifies the divine judgment and its precise cause. God Himself is the agent of the fatal blow, and the reason is Uzzah's "error" (shal). This "error" was his unauthorized touching of the Ark, a direct and explicit violation of the Mosaic law found in Numbers 4:15, which strictly prohibited anyone, even the designated Kohathite Levites, from touching the sacred object directly, requiring it to be carried by poles. Uzzah's action was a presumptuous breach of divine command.
"and there he died by the ark of God"
This final clause states the tragic and immediate consequence of Uzzah's transgression. His death occurred precisely at the location of his offense, by the very Ark whose sanctity he violated. This detail emphasizes the direct correlation between his action and the divine judgment, serving as a stark and undeniable warning to all who would approach God's holiness improperly or on terms other than His own.
Literary Devices
The narrative of Uzzah's death employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound theological message. The most striking is Juxtaposition, as the initial joyous and celebratory atmosphere of the Ark's procession, filled with music and dancing, is abruptly shattered by the sudden, solemn, and terrifying death of Uzzah. This stark contrast powerfully emphasizes the gravity of the transgression and the awe-inspiring, unapproachable nature of God's holiness. There is also a profound Irony in Uzzah's seemingly "good intention" of steadying the Ark to prevent it from falling, which directly leads to his demise. This highlights the critical biblical principle that human reasoning, even when well-meaning, cannot override or supersede divine command. The Ark itself functions as potent Symbolism, representing God's very presence, His throne, and the covenant relationship with Israel; its inviolability underscores God's transcendent and holy nature. Finally, the entire event serves as a form of Foreshadowing, hinting at the profound chasm between a holy God and sinful humanity, a gap that the Old Covenant system could only highlight, and which would ultimately require a divine mediator to bridge without incurring wrath.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The incident of Uzzah's death stands as a profound theological statement on the nature of God's absolute holiness, His unyielding justice, and the non-negotiable necessity of reverent obedience to His revealed will. It resonates with other instances in Scripture where God's immediate judgment falls upon those who treat His sacred commands or presence with irreverence, presumption, or unholy fire. Just as Adam and Eve were cast out of Eden for their disobedience, and Nadab and Abihu were consumed by fire for offering "strange fire" before the Lord (Leviticus 10:1-2), Uzzah's death serves as a vivid and terrifying reminder that God is not to be trifled with. His holiness is not merely an abstract theological concept but a consuming reality (Hebrews 12:29) that demands utmost respect, precise adherence to His revealed will, and a recognition that He alone defines the terms of worship and approach, not humanity's convenience or perceived good intentions.
Reflection and Application
While believers today live under the New Covenant of grace, the enduring principles revealed in Uzzah's story remain profoundly relevant and foundational for our understanding of God. God's character, including His absolute holiness, justice, and unchanging nature, is eternal. This passage calls us to approach God not with a spirit of fear of arbitrary judgment, but with profound reverence, deep humility, and a sincere, diligent desire to understand and obey His revealed will as found in Scripture. It serves as a powerful challenge to any casualness, presumption, or self-willed approach in our worship, our service, or our daily walk with God. True spirituality is never about good intentions alone, but about aligning our actions, attitudes, and methods with God's truth, seeking to honor Him on His terms, and recognizing the immense privilege of drawing near to Him through the atoning work of Christ. It compels us to engage in careful study of Scripture to discern how God desires to be honored and served, ensuring our lives reflect a deep respect for His majesty and sovereign authority.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Uzzah's punishment so severe for what seems like a good intention?
Uzzah's act was not merely a "good intention" but a direct and explicit violation of God's meticulously detailed commands regarding the Ark of the Covenant. According to Numbers 4:15, only the Kohathite Levites were permitted to carry the Ark, and they were strictly forbidden from touching it directly; it was to be transported by poles inserted into rings, and the Kohathites themselves were not to touch the holy things directly, but only the poles. Uzzah, though a Levite, was not among the designated Kohathite carriers, nor was the Ark being carried by poles as divinely commanded. His action, while perhaps an instinctive reaction to prevent the Ark from falling, demonstrated a profound lack of reverence for God's holiness and a presumptuous belief that human intervention could supersede divine law. God's severity underscored the absolute sanctity of His presence and the seriousness of disregarding His revealed will, setting a foundational precedent for the nascent kingdom of Israel about the proper way to approach and worship Him. This incident, much like that of Nadab and Abihu who offered unauthorized fire, served as a stark, necessary lesson to a people prone to treating sacred things casually and to a new king establishing proper worship.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The solemn narrative of Uzzah's death powerfully illuminates the vast, unbridgeable chasm between a holy God and sinful humanity, a chasm that the Old Covenant, with its strict laws, sacrificial system, and inaccessible Ark, could only highlight and never fully resolve. The Ark, representing God's awesome and consuming presence, was a place of both blessing and terrifying judgment, demonstrating that no one could approach a holy God on their own terms without incurring wrath. This stark reality of divine holiness and human inadequacy finds its ultimate and glorious resolution in Jesus Christ. While Uzzah died for touching the Ark in an unauthorized manner, Jesus, the very embodiment of God's presence among us, the Word made flesh, willingly allowed Himself to be "smitten" by God for our "error" and "breach" of sin, bearing the full weight of divine wrath on the cross (Isaiah 53:4-6). Through His perfect obedience and sacrificial death, Christ tore the veil that separated humanity from God, granting us direct, confident access to the Father's presence (Hebrews 10:19-20). He is the true and living way, enabling us to approach a holy God not with fear of death for our presumption, but with grace and peace, because He perfectly fulfilled the very holiness the Ark represented and bore the judgment that was rightfully due to us.