TRV
Translation
King James Version
And God said to Jonah, Doest thou well to be angry for the gourd? And he said, I do well to be angry, even unto death.
Complete Jewish Bible
God asked Yonah, "Is it right for you to be so angry about the castor-bean plant?" He answered, "Yes, it's right for me to be so angry that I could die!"
Berean Standard Bible
Then God asked Jonah, “Have you any right to be angry about the plant?” “I do,” he replied. “I am angry enough to die!”
American Standard Version
And God said to Jonah, Doest thou well to be angry for the gourd? And he said, I do well to be angry, even unto death.
World English Bible Messianic
God said to Jonah, “Is it right for you to be angry about the vine?” He said, “I am right to be angry, even to death.”
Geneva Bible (1599)
And God said vnto Ionah, Doest thou well to be angrie for the gourde? And he said, I doe well to be angrie vnto the death.
Young's Literal Translation
And God saith unto Jonah: `Is doing good displeasing to thee, because of the gourd?' and he saith, `To do good is displeasing to me--unto death.'
In the KJVVerse 22,578 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers . Public domain.
Copy as
Tyrannius RufinusAD 411
The Apology of Rufinus (Book II), Section 35
This has been the present which you have made us with your excess of wisdom, that we are all judged even by the heathen as lacking in wisdom... The ears of simple men among the Latins ought not after four hundred years to be molested by the sound of new doctrines... Now you are yourself saying... When the world has grown old and all things are hastening to their end, let us change the inscriptions upon the tombs of the ancients, so that it may be known by those who had read the story otherwise, that it was not a gourd but an ivy plant under whose shade Jonah rested; and that, when our legislator pleases, it will no longer be the shade of ivy but of some other plant.
JeromeAD 420
Augustine Letter 75 (From Jerome), Chapter 7, Section 22
You tell me that I have given a wrong translation of some word in Jonah, and that a worthy bishop narrowly escaped losing his charge through the clamorous tumult of his people, which was caused by the different rendering of this one word. At the same time, you withhold from me what the word was which I have mistranslated; thus taking away the possibility of my saying anything in my own vindication, lest my reply should be fatal to your objection. Perhaps it is the old dispute about the gourd which has been revived, after slumbering for many long years since the illustrious man, who in that day combined in his own person the ancestral honours of the Cornelii and of Asinius Pollio, brought against me the charge of giving in my translation the word "ivy" instead of "gourd." I have already given a sufficient answer to this in my commentary on Jonah. At present, I deem it enough to say that in that passage, where the Septuagint has "gourd," and Aquila and the others have rendered the word "ivy" (κίσσος), the Hebrew manuscript has "ciceion," which is in the Syriac tongue, as now spoken, "ciceia." It is a kind of shrub having large leaves like a vine, and when planted it quickly springs up to the size of a small tree, standing upright by its own stem, without requiring any support of canes or poles, as both gourds and ivy do. If, therefore, in translating word for word, I had put the word "ciceia," no one would know what it meant; if I had used the word "gourd," I would have said what is not found in the Hebrew. I therefore put down "ivy," that I might not differ from all other translators. But if your Jews said, either through malice or ignorance, as you yourself suggest, that the word is in the Hebrew text which is found in the Greek and Latin versions, it is evident that they were either unacquainted with Hebrew, or have been pleased to say what was not true, in order to make sport of the gourd-planters.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Jonah, Chapter 4
"And God said to Jonah, Do you well to be angry for the gourd? And he said, I do well to be angry, even unto death." LXX: 'and the Lord God said to Jonah, are you so afflicted for a gourd? He replied, 'I am very afflicted even to the point of death'. When he was asked about the repentance of the inhabitants of Nineveh and the safety of the city of the gentiles, 'do you well to be angry?', the prophet replied nothing, yet justified God's question by his silence. For he knew that God is kind, merciful, patient, and full of pity [Ex. 34:6; Ps 102:8], pardoning wickedness and he did not feel sad for the safety of the gentiles; but once the gourd, (Israel) had dried up, when he is asked, 'do you well to be angry for the gourd?', he replies with assurance, 'I do well to be angry and to suffer even unto death. I did not want to save one only to see the others perish, to gain foreigners only to lose my own'. And in truth up until this day Christ weeps for Jerusalem and he weeps until death; not his own death, but that of the Jews, so that they die refusing and rise up again confessing the Son of God.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Jonah 4:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Jonah 4:9 captures a critical exchange between God and His prophet, Jonah, immediately following God's withdrawal of the shade-giving gourd. God directly challenges Jonah's intense and self-justifying anger over the loss of a mere plant, asking if his wrath is truly righteous. Jonah's defiant and extreme response—that his anger is justified "even unto death"—reveals the profound depth of his self-pity, misplaced priorities, and stubborn refusal to align his heart with God's compassionate will for Nineveh. This verse serves as the climax of God's patient interrogation, exposing the prophet's spiritual blindness.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is situated at the climax of the book of Jonah's final chapter, serving as the penultimate dialogue before God's concluding rhetorical question in Jonah 4:11. The preceding verses (Jonah 4:5-8) describe God's miraculous provision of a gourd for shade, Jonah's temporary relief, and then God's subsequent removal of the gourd through a worm and a scorching east wind. This sequence is a deliberate object lesson designed by God to draw out Jonah's true feelings and expose the disproportionate nature of his grief. Jonah's anger here is a continuation of his displeasure first expressed in Jonah 4:1 after Nineveh's repentance, highlighting his consistent rebellion against God's mercy.
Historical & Cultural Context: The book of Jonah is set during the reign of Jeroboam II (793–753 BC) in Israel, a time when Assyria, with its capital Nineveh, was a formidable and cruel empire, a common enemy of Israel. The Assyrians were notorious for their brutality, making Jonah's reluctance to preach to them understandable from a human perspective, yet entirely contrary to God's universal compassion. The "gourd" (Hebrew: qîyqâyôwn) was likely a fast-growing castor oil plant, known for its large leaves providing ample shade in the hot, arid climate of the Middle East. For a traveler like Jonah, such shade would have been a significant comfort, making its sudden loss a genuine physical hardship. However, God uses this common experience to highlight Jonah's spiritual priorities, contrasting his personal discomfort with the spiritual welfare of an entire city.
Key Themes: Jonah 4:9 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in the book of Jonah. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Patience and Interrogation, as God continues to engage Jonah despite his stubbornness, patiently probing the root of his anger rather than immediately condemning him. Secondly, it starkly contrasts Human Self-Centeredness with Divine Compassion, revealing Jonah's greater concern for a plant's comfort than for the spiritual fate of over 120,000 people in Nineveh, echoing the broader tension between God's universal love and Jonah's narrow nationalism. Finally, the verse highlights the nature of Unrighteous Anger, demonstrating that Jonah's wrath is not a holy indignation against sin, but a selfish resentment that God's mercy did not align with his personal desires for Nineveh's destruction. This contrasts sharply with biblical wisdom on anger, such as that found in Proverbs 14:29.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several significant literary devices. The most prominent is Rhetorical Question, as God's initial query, "Doest thou well to be angry for the gourd?", is not seeking information but rather aiming to provoke introspection and expose the absurdity of Jonah's position. This is immediately followed by Hyperbole in Jonah's response, "I do well to be angry, even unto death," which dramatically exaggerates his emotional state to convey the depth of his self-pity and stubbornness. There is also a strong element of Irony present; Jonah, who was saved from death in the fish, now wishes for death over the loss of a plant, while God, whom Jonah resists, is actively working to save an entire city from death. Finally, the dialogue itself serves as a Didactic Dialogue, where God uses a series of questions and object lessons to teach Jonah (and the reader) profound truths about divine compassion and human self-centeredness.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Jonah 4:9 is a poignant illustration of the profound chasm that can exist between human desires and divine purposes. Jonah's anger over a withered plant, which he neither cultivated nor earned, highlights a self-centeredness that prioritizes personal comfort and nationalistic prejudice over God's boundless mercy for all humanity. This exchange serves as a powerful reminder that God's compassion extends far beyond our limited understanding and often challenges our preconceived notions of who is worthy of grace. It also underscores God's persistent patience in confronting our spiritual blind spots, using even discomfort and loss as teaching tools to align our hearts with His own.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Jonah's raw, self-justifying anger in this verse serves as a potent mirror for our own hearts. We, too, can become disproportionately upset over trivial matters or when God's grace extends to those we deem undeserving. This passage challenges us to deeply examine the roots of our anger: Is it righteous indignation against sin, or is it rooted in pride, prejudice, personal inconvenience, or a desire for God to conform to our expectations? Jonah valued a temporary plant more than the eternal souls of an entire city, a chilling reminder to assess our own priorities. Are we more concerned with our comfort, reputation, or personal preferences than with God's redemptive mission in the world? God's patient, probing question to Jonah invites us to allow Him to expose our own unrighteous anger and to cultivate a heart that truly grieves over sin and rejoices in God's mercy, even for our "enemies."
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Jonah so angry about a gourd, and what does it signify?
Answer: Jonah's anger over the gourd (a fast-growing plant that provided him temporary shade) was not just about the plant itself, but about what its loss represented in the context of God's mercy to Nineveh. The gourd was a comfort God provided and then removed as an object lesson. Jonah's disproportionate anger revealed his self-pity and his stubborn refusal to accept God's compassion for the Ninevites. He was more concerned about his own physical comfort and the perceived "injustice" of Nineveh being spared than he was about the spiritual salvation of over 120,000 people (Jonah 4:10-11). The gourd signified a temporary, unearned blessing that Jonah selfishly clung to, exposing his lack of compassion.
How does God's question, "Doest thou well to be angry?", challenge Jonah?
Answer: God's question is a rhetorical challenge to the very righteousness and moral validity of Jonah's anger. The Hebrew phrase implies "Is your anger good or justified?" God is not simply acknowledging Jonah's emotion but probing its source and nature. He is forcing Jonah to confront the irrationality and selfishness of being intensely angry over a plant that he did not labor for, while simultaneously being devoid of pity for a vast city of people who were perishing without knowledge of God (Jonah 4:11). This question highlights the stark contrast between Jonah's narrow, self-serving perspective and God's expansive, merciful heart.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The narrative of Jonah, particularly this exchange in Jonah 4:9, finds its ultimate fulfillment and contrast in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Jonah's self-centered anger, his desire for judgment rather than mercy, and his ultimate disobedience stand in stark opposition to Christ's perfect obedience and boundless compassion. While Jonah was angry "even unto death" over a trivial comfort and the sparing of enemies, Jesus willingly embraced death on the cross, not for His own comfort, but to secure salvation for His enemies (Romans 5:8). The gourd, a temporary shade that withered, foreshadows the fleeting nature of earthly comforts and the need for a lasting refuge found only in Christ, who is the true "shadow from the heat" (Isaiah 25:4). Furthermore, God's patient pursuit of Jonah, seeking to transform his heart, prefigures Christ's persistent call to repentance and His mission to seek and save the lost, including those considered "outsiders" or "enemies" (Luke 19:10). The "sign of Jonah" that Jesus Himself referenced (Matthew 12:39-41) points not to Jonah's preaching, but to his three days and three nights in the belly of the fish, a direct foreshadowing of Christ's death, burial, and resurrection, which ultimately provides the universal salvation that Jonah so begrudgingly witnessed.