דלג לתוכן

1 Samuel 10:21

“Saul Is Chosen Publicly at Mizpeh”· 1 Samuel 10:17–25Read in context
King James Version
When he had caused the tribe of Benjamin to come near by their families, the family of Matri was taken, and Saul the son of Kish was taken: and when they sought him, he could not be found.
KJV (with Strong's)
When he had caused the tribe H7626 of Benjamin H1144 to come near H7126 by their families H4940, the family H4940 of Matri H4309 was taken H3920, and Saul H7586 the son H1121 of Kish H7027 was taken H3920: and when they sought H1245 him, he could not be found H4672.
Complete Jewish Bible
He had the tribe of Binyamin come forward by families, and the family of the Matri was chosen, and Sha'ul the son of Kish was chosen. But when they looked for him, he couldn't be found.
Berean Standard Bible
Then he had the tribe of Benjamin come forward by its clans, and the clan of Matri was selected. Finally, Saul son of Kish was selected. But when they looked for him, they could not find him.
American Standard Version
And he brought the tribe of Benjamin near by their families; and the family of the Matrites was taken; and Saul the son of Kish was taken: but when they sought him, he could not be found.
World English Bible Messianic
He brought the tribe of Benjamin near by their families; and the family of the Matrites was taken; and Saul the son of Kish was taken: but when they sought him, he could not be found.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Afterwarde he assembled the tribe of Beniamin according to their families, and the familie of Matri was taken. So Saul the sonne of Kish was taken, and when they sought him, he coulde not be found.
Young's Literal Translation
and he bringeth near the tribe of Benjamin by its families, and the family of Matri is captured, and Saul son of Kish is captured, and they seek him, and he hath not been found.
עברית · Modern
ויקרב את שבט בנימן למשפחתו ותלכד משפחת המטרי וילכד שאול בן קיש ויבקשהו ולא נמצא׃
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 7,440 of 31,102 · 23.9%

Study this verse

Summary

1 Samuel 10:21 narrates the climactic moment of Israel's first king, Saul, being publicly identified through the sacred process of casting lots. This meticulous, divinely guided selection method narrowed the choice from the tribe of Benjamin to the family of Matri, and finally to Saul, the son of Kish. However, at the precise juncture of his unveiling, Saul was conspicuously absent, adding an unexpected and ironic twist to his reluctant and divinely appointed ascent to the throne, underscoring both God's sovereign choice and human apprehension.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is strategically placed at a pivotal point in 1 Samuel, serving as the public confirmation of the monarchy after Samuel's private anointing of Saul in 1 Samuel 10:1. The preceding chapters detail Israel's persistent demand for a king, despite Samuel's prophetic warnings and God's initial displeasure, as vividly portrayed in 1 Samuel 8:5-9. The assembly at Mizpah, where the lot was cast, functions as the formal national ratification of God's choice, providing undeniable divine legitimacy to the nascent governmental structure. Saul's subsequent discovery and presentation to the people, culminating in their acclamation, immediately follow this verse in 1 Samuel 10:22-24, completing the dramatic scene of his introduction as the anointed king.

Historical & Cultural Context

The transition from a loose tribal confederacy, under the leadership of judges, to a centralized monarchy represented a monumental paradigm shift in ancient Israel. The practice of casting lots, often involving sacred objects like the Urim and Thummim, was a widely accepted and revered method for discerning the divine will in matters of national import, ranging from land distribution and judicial rulings to the selection of leaders. This method profoundly underscored the belief that God was directly intervening in human affairs, ensuring that the choice of king was not predicated on human preference, political maneuvering, or hereditary claims, but on direct divine appointment. Mizpah itself was a historically significant cultic and assembly site, frequently serving as a gathering place for national decisions, religious convocations, and covenant renewals, thereby lending profound weight and solemnity to these proceedings.

Key Themes

The events of 1 Samuel 10:21 powerfully illuminate several core biblical themes. Divine Sovereignty is paramount, as God's choice is unequivocally demonstrated through the lot, overriding human expectations or even Saul's own reluctance. This emphasizes that true authority originates solely from God, not from popular demand or personal merit, a principle echoed throughout Scripture (e.g., Daniel 2:21). Another prominent theme is Human Reluctance and Humility in the face of a divine call. Saul's initial hiding suggests a profound sense of inadequacy or fear concerning the immense responsibility of kingship, a characteristic often valued in biblical narratives of leadership, where God's strength is made perfect in weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9). Finally, the narrative highlights God's Unexpected Choices, as He frequently selects individuals who are not prominent or who may even be reluctant, demonstrating His power to use anyone for His purposes, regardless of their background or initial disposition (e.g., Judges 6:15-16).

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

taken לָכַד, lakad' H3920

The verb used here, specifically in its passive form (nilkad), means "to seize," "to capture," or "to apprehend." In the context of casting lots, it signifies a definitive and inescapable selection, as if the chosen individual was "caught" or "apprehended" by the divine process. It conveys the idea that the outcome was fixed and undeniable, leaving no room for human manipulation or dispute, even if the chosen one was initially absent. The root definition "to cohere" also subtly suggests that the chosen individual is now bound to this new role.

son בֵּן, bên' H1121

This common Hebrew term, meaning "son," is significant here not just for identifying Saul's lineage, but also for its broader implications as a "builder of the family name." Saul is identified as "the son of Kish," rooting his identity within his family and tribe, emphasizing that his selection impacts not just him but his entire familial unit. It connects him to the specific lineage of Kish, a man of standing, yet also underscores the humility of his family's position within Benjamin (1 Samuel 9:21).

sought בָּקַשׁ, bâqash' H1245

This verb implies an active, diligent, and often urgent search. The use of bâqash here emphasizes the immediate and widespread effort to locate Saul once he was identified by the lot. It highlights the surprise and perhaps consternation of the assembly when their newly chosen king could not be found, adding to the dramatic tension of the moment. The root meaning "to strive after" or "to make inquisition" further underscores the earnestness of their search.

Verse Breakdown

"When he had caused the tribe of Benjamin to come near by their families"

This phrase meticulously details the systematic and orderly process of the lot-casting. Samuel, acting as God's representative, orchestrates the narrowing down of the selection, first by tribe, ensuring that every family within Benjamin is presented for the divine decision. This methodical approach underscores the fairness, transparency, and divine control over the selection process, leaving no room for human bias or error in the initial stages.

"the family of Matri was taken"

The lot, guided by divine providence, precisely identifies a specific family within the tribe of Benjamin. This further refines the search, demonstrating the remarkable precision with which God was revealing His chosen leader, moving from a broad group to a more defined, specific familial unit. This step heightens the anticipation as the choice becomes increasingly narrow.

"and Saul the son of Kish was taken"

This is the climactic moment of individual identification. The final casting of the lot pinpoints Saul, the son of Kish, as the one definitively chosen by God. This moment publicly confirms Samuel's prior private anointing, establishing Saul's kingship not by popular vote or human ambition, but by undeniable divine appointment, setting him apart as the Lord's anointed.

"and when they sought him, he could not be found"

This concluding clause introduces the unexpected and dramatic turn of events. Despite the clear divine selection, Saul is conspicuously absent, creating immediate suspense and highlighting his initial reluctance or fear concerning the immense responsibility that has just been thrust upon him. This absence underscores the tension between divine will and human response, adding a layer of ironic humanity to the sacred event.

Literary Devices

The narrative of 1 Samuel 10:21 is rich with Dramatic Irony, as the very person chosen by God to lead the nation is initially nowhere to be found, creating a stark contrast between divine appointment and human apprehension. This unexpected absence builds significant Suspense, delaying the public presentation of the king and intensifying the anticipation of the crowd and the narrator's audience. The scene also employs elements of Situational Humor or Divine Comedy, as the grand unveiling of Israel's first monarch is momentarily thwarted by the king's hiding, adding a touch of unexpected humanity and relatability to the divine drama. Furthermore, Saul's initial reluctance and hiding could be seen as Foreshadowing his later struggles with leadership, including his tendency to hide from God's commands or to act out of fear rather than faith, ultimately leading to his rejection.

Theological and Thematic Connections

This verse profoundly illustrates God's sovereign hand in human affairs, particularly in the establishment of leadership. The casting of lots was not a random gamble but a sacred means by which ancient Israel sought and believed they received divine direction, emphasizing that Saul's kingship was a divine appointment, not a human election. It highlights the tension between God's clear call and human reluctance, a theme frequently explored in Scripture. True leadership, from a biblical perspective, often begins not with ambition but with a humble recognition of one's inadequacy and a reliance on God's enabling power. Saul's initial humility, though fleeting, serves as a poignant reminder that God often chooses the meek and the seemingly unqualified to accomplish His purposes, demonstrating that His power is perfected in weakness. This narrative underscores that God's choices are often surprising, designed to reveal His glory rather than human strength.

Reflection and Application

The dramatic scene of Saul's selection and subsequent hiding offers profound insights for believers today. God often calls individuals to tasks and roles that feel overwhelming, far beyond our perceived capabilities or comfort zones. Our initial response, like Saul's, might be fear, inadequacy, or even a desire to shrink from the responsibility. However, this narrative reminds us that God equips those He calls, and true leadership is often characterized not by an eager pursuit of power but by a humble recognition of dependence on divine strength. It challenges us to reflect on how we respond when God's will becomes clear, especially when it demands stepping into uncomfortable or challenging situations. Are we willing to trust His plan and His provision, even when our own fears or insecurities tempt us to hide? This passage encourages us to embrace God's call with a spirit of humility and courageous obedience, knowing that His sovereign hand is always at work, guiding and empowering His chosen ones to fulfill His purposes, even when we feel least prepared.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How do you typically respond when God calls you to a task that feels overwhelming or beyond your capabilities?
  2. What does Saul's initial absence teach us about the nature of true leadership, particularly in contrast to self-seeking ambition?
  3. In what areas of your life might God be calling you to step out in faith, even if it means overcoming fear or reluctance?

FAQ

Why was Saul hiding when he was chosen as king?

Saul's hiding is open to several interpretations, all pointing to his initial reluctance rather than eagerness for power. It could stem from genuine humility, a profound sense of unworthiness given his family's obscurity and his tribe's smallness (1 Samuel 9:21). Alternatively, it might indicate an overwhelming fear and anxiety about the immense responsibility and public scrutiny associated with leading a nation. This initial reaction stands in stark contrast to the typical image of an ambitious leader, highlighting that God's chosen often do not fit human expectations. His hiding underscores the divine nature of his selection, as he was "taken" by God's will, not by his own ambition or political maneuvering.

What was the significance of casting lots in this context?

Casting lots was a well-established and divinely sanctioned method in ancient Israel for discerning God's will in crucial matters. Its significance here is multifaceted: it publicly legitimized Saul's selection by demonstrating that he was God's choice, not merely Samuel's or the people's preference; it removed any potential accusations of favoritism, political manipulation, or human bias; and it served to confirm the divine authority of the newly established monarchy. This practice is seen throughout the Old Testament, from land distribution (e.g., Numbers 26:55) to judicial decisions (e.g., Joshua 7:16-18), and even in the New Testament, such as in the selection of Matthias to replace Judas in Acts 1:26). It underscored the pervasive belief that "the lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord" (Proverbs 16:33).

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The dramatic selection of Saul by divine lot, his initial reluctance, and subsequent public presentation, though imperfect and ultimately tragic, serves as a poignant foreshadowing of the ultimate King, Jesus Christ. Unlike Saul, who was "taken" by lot and found hiding, Jesus, the true and eternal King, was not chosen by human means or lot but was eternally appointed by God, willingly embracing His mission from the outset. While Saul's humility was mixed with fear and ultimately gave way to pride, Christ's humility was perfect and redemptive; He did not cling to His divine status but "emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men" (Philippians 2:7). Jesus, though the rightful King, often withdrew from public acclamation, not out of fear of responsibility, but to fulfill His redemptive purpose and avoid premature enthronement by human hands (John 6:15). Ultimately, Jesus is the King who does not hide, but openly declares His identity and purpose, presenting Himself as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world and the Good Shepherd who lays down His life for His sheep. His kingdom is not of this world, yet He reigns eternally, a King who was "taken" by divine plan to the cross, only to be publicly exalted as Lord of lords and King of kings, ruling with perfect justice and unfailing love.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 10:17–27. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under comment1 Samuel 10:17–27
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Saul's nomination to the throne is here made public, in a general assembly of the elders of Israel, the representatives of their respective tribes at Mizpeh. It is probable that this convention of the states was called as soon as conveniently it might, after Saul was anointed, for, if there must be a change in their government, the sooner the better: it might be of bad consequence to be long in the doing. The people having met in a solemn assembly, in which God was in a peculiar manner present (and therefore it is said they were called together unto the Lord, Sa1 10:17), Samuel acts for God among them.

I.He reproves them for casting off the government of a prophet, and desiring that of a captain.

1.He shows them (Sa1 10:18) how happy they had been under the divine government; when God ruled them, he delivered them out of the hand of those that oppressed them, and what would they desire more? Could the mightiest man of valour do that for them which the Almighty God had done?

2.He likewise shows them (Sa1 10:19) what an affront they had put upon God (who had himself saved them out of all their tribulations, by his own power, and by such as he had immediately called and qualified) in desiring a king to save them. He tells them in plain terms, "You have this day rejected your God; you have in effect done it: so he construes it, and he might justly, for your so doing, reject you." Those that can live better by sense than by faith, that stay themselves upon an arm of flesh rather than upon the almighty arm, forsake a fountain of living waters for broken cisterns. And some make their obstinacy in this matter to be a presage of their rejecting Christ, in casting off whom they cast off God, that he should not reign over them.

II.He puts them upon choosing their king by lot.

He knew whom God had chosen, and had already anointed him, but he knew also the peevishness of that people, and that there were those among them who would not acquiesce in the choice if it depended upon his single testimony; and therefore, that every tribe and every family of the chosen tribe might please themselves with having a chance for it, he calls them to the lot, Sa1 10:19. Benjamin is taken out of all the tribes (Sa1 10:20), and out of that tribe Saul the son of Kish, Sa1 10:21. By this method it would appear to the people, as it already appeared to Samuel, that Saul was appointed of God to be king; for the disposal of the lot is of the Lord. It would also prevent all disputes and exceptions; for the lot causeth contentions to cease, and parteth between the mighty. When the tribe of Benjamin was taken, they might easily foresee that they were setting up a family that would soon be put down again; for dying Jacob had, by the spirit of prophecy, entailed the dominion upon Judah. Judah is the tribe that must rule as a lion; Benjamin shall only ravin as a wolf, Gen 49:10, Gen 49:27. Those therefore that knew the scriptures could not be very fond of the doing of that which they foresaw must, ere long, be undone again.

III.It is with much ado, and not without further enquiries of the Lord, that Saul is at length produced.

When the lot fell upon him, every one expected he should answer to his name at the first call, but, instead of that, none of his friends could find him (Sa1 10:21), he had hidden himself among the stuff (Sa1 10:22), so little fond was he now of that power which yet, when he was in possession of, he could not without the utmost indignation think of parting with.

1.He withdrew, in hopes that, upon his not appearing, they would proceed to another choice, or thus to express his modesty; for, by what had already passed, he knew he must be the man. We may suppose he was at this time really averse to take upon him the government,

(1.)Because he was conscious to himself of unfitness for so great a trust. He had not been bred up to books, or arms, or courts, and feared he should be guilty of some fatal blunder.

(2.)Because it would expose him to the envy of his neighbours that were ill-affected towards him.

(3.)Because he understood, by what Samuel had said, that the people sinned in asking a king, and it was in anger that God granted their request.

(4.)Because the affairs of Israel were at this time in a bad posture; the Philistines were strong, the Ammonites threatening: and he must be bold indeed that will set sail in a storm.

2.But the congregation, believing that choice well made which God himself made, would leave no way untried to find him out on whom the lot fell. They enquired of the Lord, either by the high priest, and his breast-plate of judgment, or by Samuel, and his spirit of prophecy; and the Lord directed them where they should find him, hidden among the carriages, and thence they fetched him, Sa1 10:23. Note, None will be losers at last by their humility and modesty. Honour, like the shadow, follows those that flee from it, but flees from those that pursue it.

IV.Samuel presents him to the people, and they accept him.

He needed not to mount the bench, or scaffold, to be seen; when he stood upon even ground with the rest he was seen above them all, for he was taller than any of them by head and shoulders, Sa1 10:23. "Look you," said Samuel, "what a king God has chosen for you, just such a one as you wished for; there is none like him among all the people, that has so much majesty in his countenance and such a graceful stateliness in his mien; he is in the crowd like a cedar among the shrubs. Let your own eyes be judges, is he not a brave and gallant man?" The people hereupon signified their approbation of the choice, and their acceptance of him; they shouted and said, Let the king live, that is, "Let him long reign over us in health and prosperity." Subjects were wont to testify their affection and allegiance to their prince by their good wishes, and those turned (as our translation does this) into addresses to God. Psa 72:15, Prayer shall be made for him continually. See Psa 20:1. Samuel had told them they would soon be weary of their king, but, in the mind they are now in, they will never be so: Let the king live.

V.Samuel settles the original contract between them, and leaves it upon record, Sa1 10:25.

He had before told them the manner of the king (Sa1 8:11), how he would abuse his power; now he tells them the manner of the kingdom, or rather the law, or judgment, or constitution, of it, what power the prince might challenge and the utmost of the property the subject might claim. He fixed the land-marks between them, that neither might encroach upon the other. Let them rightly understand one another at first, and let the agreement remain in black and white, which will tend to preserve a good understanding between them ever after. The learned bishop Patrick thinks he now repeated and registered what he had told them (Sa1 8:11) of the arbitrary power their kings would assume, that it might hereafter be a witness against them that they had drawn the calamity upon themselves, for they were warned what it would come to and yet they would have a king.

VI.The convention was dissolved when the solemnity was over:

Samuel sent every man to his house. Here were no votes passed, nor, for aught that appears, so much as a motion made, for the raising of money to support the dignity of their new-elected king; if therefore he afterwards thinks fit to take what they do not think fit to give (which yet it was necessary that he should have), they must thank themselves. They went every man to his house, pleased with the name of a king over them, and Saul also went home to Gibeah, to his father's house, not puffed up with the name of a kingdom under him. At Gibeah he had no palace, no throne, no court, yet thither he goes. If he must be a king, as one mindful of the rock out of which he was hewn, he will make his own city the royal city, nor will he be ashamed (as too many are when they are preferred) of his mean relations. Such a humble spirit as this puts a beauty and lustre upon great advancements. The condition rising, and the mind not rising with it, behold how good and pleasant it is! But,

1.How did the people stand affected to their new king? The generality of them, it should seem, did not show themselves much concerned: They went every man to his own house. Their own domestic affairs lay nearer their hearts than any interests of the public; this was the general temper. But,

(1.)There were some so faithful as to attend him: A band of men whose hearts God had touched, Sa1 10:26. Not the body of the people, but a small company, who because they were fond of their own choice of a king, or because they had so much more sense than their neighbours as to conclude that if he was a king he ought to be respected accordingly, went with him to Gibeah, as his life-guard. They were those whose hearts God had touched, in this instance, to do their duty. Note, Whatever good there is in us, or is done by us, at any time, it must be ascribed to the grace of God. If the heart bend at any time the right way, it is because he has touched it. One touch is enough, when it is divine.

(2.)There were others so spiteful as to affront him; children of Belial, men that would endure no yoke, that would be pleased with nothing that either God or Samuel did; they despised him (Sa1 10:27) for the meanness of his tribe and family, the smallness of his estate, and the privacy of his education; and they said, How shall this man save us? Yet they did not propose any man more likely; nor, whomsoever they had, must their salvation come from the man, but from God. They would not join with their neighbours in testifying an affection to him and his government, by bringing him presents, or addressing him upon his accession to the crown. Perhaps those discontented spirits were most earnest for a king, and yet, now that they had one, they quarrelled with him, because he was not altogether such a one as themselves. It was reason enough for them not to like him because others did. Thus differently are men affected to our exalted Redeemer. God hath set him king upon the holy hill of Sion. There is a remnant that submit to him, rejoice in him, bring him presents, and follow him wherever he goes; and they are those whose hearts God has touched, whom he has made willing in the day of his power. But there are others who despise him, who ask, How shall this man save us? They are offended in him, stumble at his external meanness, and they will be broken by it.

2.How did Saul resent the bad conduct of those that were disaffected to his government? He held his peace. Margin, He was as though he had been deaf. He was so far from resenting it that he seemed not to take notice of it, which was an evidence of his humility and modesty, and the mercifulness of his disposition, and also that he was well satisfied with his title to the crown; for those are commonly most jealous of their honour, and most revengeful of affronts, that gain their power by improper means. Christ held his peace when he was affronted, for it was the day of his patience; but there is a day of recompence coming.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.

1 quote · AD 604
AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly MedievalSourcePASTORAL CARE 1.3
It is common experience that in the school of adversity the heart is forced to discipline itself; but when one has achieved supreme rule, it is at once changed and puffed up by the experience of his high estate.It was thus that Saul, realizing at first his unworthiness, fled from the honor of governing but presently assumed it and was puffed up with pride. By his desire for honor before the people and wishing not to be blamed before them, he alienated him who had anointed him to be king.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 10:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8