Skip to content

1 Samuel 10:26

“The King’s Initial Reception”· 1 Samuel 10:26–27Read in context
King James Version
And Saul also went home to Gibeah; and there went with him a band of men, whose hearts God had touched.
KJV (with Strong's)
And Saul H7586 also went H1980 home H1004 to Gibeah H1390; and there went H3212 with him a band of men H2428, whose hearts H3820 God H430 had touched H5060.
Complete Jewish Bible
Sha'ul too went home to Giv'ah, accompanied by warriors whose hearts God had touched.
Berean Standard Bible
Saul also went to his home in Gibeah, and the men of valor whose hearts God had touched went with him.
American Standard Version
And Saul also went to his house to Gibeah; and there went with him the host, whose hearts God had touched.
World English Bible Messianic
Saul also went to his house to Gibeah; and there went with him the army, whose hearts God had touched.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Saul also went home to Gibeah, and there followed him a bande of men, whose heart God had touched,
Young's Literal Translation
And also Saul hath gone to his house, to Gibeah, and the force go with him whose heart God hath touched;
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 7,445 of 31,102 · 23.9%

Study this verse

Summary

Following his public acclamation as Israel's first king at Mizpah, 1 Samuel 10:26 records Saul's return to his hometown of Gibeah, accompanied by a dedicated contingent of men. This verse highlights the immediate divine provision of loyal support for the nascent monarchy, emphasizing that their allegiance was not merely political or circumstantial, but a direct result of God's sovereign work in their hearts, ensuring a foundational core for Saul's reign and illustrating God's active involvement in establishing His chosen leader.

Context

Literary Context

This verse serves as a crucial transition immediately following the dramatic public confirmation of Saul's kingship at Mizpah, where he was chosen by lot, revealed from hiding, and acclaimed by the people as detailed in 1 Samuel 10:17-24. It marks the shift from the grand assembly and prophetic declaration to the practical, initial stages of Saul's rule. The specific mention of a divinely-gathered "band of men" sets up a stark contrast with the "children of Belial" mentioned in the very next verse (1 Samuel 10:27), who despised Saul and brought him no tribute. This juxtaposition powerfully underscores that true, divinely-ordained support is distinct from mere human sentiment or political maneuvering, highlighting God's immediate provision of loyal adherents for His chosen king.

Historical & Cultural Context

The establishment of the monarchy in Israel marked a profound shift from the decentralized tribal confederacy under judges to a centralized kingdom. This transition was prompted by the people's demand for a king "like all the nations" (1 Samuel 8:5), yet it was ultimately orchestrated by God through Samuel. Saul, from the tribe of Benjamin, was chosen by divine decree. His return to Gibeah, a significant Benjaminite town and his personal residence, was a natural move for the newly appointed king as he began to consolidate his position. In the ancient Near East, a king's authority often relied on the loyalty of his personal guard or a core group of supporters. This verse illustrates that, for Israel's unique monarchy, this essential support was not garnered through human strategy or coercion, but through the direct, supernatural intervention of Yahweh, establishing a spiritual foundation for a political office that would guide the nation.

Key Themes

The central theme in 1 Samuel 10:26 is Divine Providence and Support, emphasizing that God actively prepares the way for His chosen leaders and purposes. The phrase "whose hearts God had touched" powerfully conveys that Saul's initial loyal following was not accidental or purely human-generated, but a direct result of God's sovereign work in the inner being of these men. This divine intervention served to Legitimize Leadership, providing a clear indicator that Saul's kingship was divinely sanctioned, not merely a product of popular vote or human ambition. It highlights that true authority, especially in God's kingdom, flows from His appointment and the enablement He provides. Furthermore, this verse contributes to the theme of the Foundations of the Monarchy, illustrating the crucial role of God in establishing the framework for Israel's new governmental structure, providing the necessary human element for its stability and initial success, even as the broader narrative of 1 Samuel unfolds to reveal the complexities and challenges of this new era.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

home bayith' H1004

This word (H1004) refers to a "house" or "home," but in a broader sense can encompass a family or household. Saul's return "home to Gibeah" signifies a transition from the public, national acclamation to his personal sphere. It indicates that while he was now king, he was still returning to his established dwelling, implying a humble beginning for his reign, not yet a grand palace or capital.

band of men chayil' H2428

The Hebrew word (H2428) chayil denotes "force," "strength," "wealth," or "valor." Here, it refers to a capable and valiant contingent of men, not just a random crowd. This "band" represents the initial, loyal core of Saul's supporters, essential for establishing and maintaining a king's authority in the ancient world. Their quality (valiant, strong) is implicitly linked to the divine touch that inspired their loyalty.

touched nâgaʻ' H5060

The Hebrew verb (H5060) nâgaʻ means "to touch, strike, or reach." In this context, it carries a profound spiritual and internal meaning, signifying a divine impact or influence upon the will and affections. It implies God's direct, effective action upon the inner person, creating a willing and loyal disposition. This is a powerful demonstration of God's sovereignty over human hearts and wills, ensuring the necessary support for His chosen leader.

hearts lêb' H3820

The Hebrew word (H3820) lêb refers to the "heart," which in biblical anthropology is not merely the seat of emotions but the center of the entire inner person—intellect, will, conscience, and moral character. When God "touched their hearts," it means He influenced their deepest convictions, their reasoning, and their willingness to commit. Their loyalty was not coerced or feigned, but arose from a divinely-implanted inclination towards Saul and the new order God was establishing.

Verse Breakdown

"And Saul also went home to Gibeah"

This clause marks Saul's return to his personal residence after the public ceremonies at Mizpah. Gibeah was his hometown, a significant city in the territory of Benjamin. This detail grounds the narrative in a specific geographical and personal reality, showing the transition from the grand, national assembly to the more intimate, practical beginnings of his rule. It signifies the commencement of his life as king, albeit still in a relatively private capacity before fully assuming the reins of power.

"and there went with him a band of men"

This phrase introduces the immediate, tangible support Saul received. This "band of men" (חַיִל, chayil, often translated "army" or "force," but here referring to a capable, loyal contingent) represents the initial core of his loyal followers, distinct from the broader populace. Their presence signifies the immediate formation of a personal retinue, essential for any king, especially one establishing a new monarchy. They were not merely curious onlookers but committed adherents, indicating the early formation of his royal court or guard.

"whose hearts God had touched"

This is the theological lynchpin of the verse. It reveals the ultimate source of these men's loyalty. Their allegiance was not based on Saul's charisma, political maneuvering, or even their own self-interest, but on a direct, supernatural intervention by God. This divine "touch" implies a sovereign work of grace, inclining their wills and affections towards supporting Saul. It underscores that God was actively involved in establishing the monarchy, not just through prophetic word, but by preparing the human instruments necessary for its function and stability.

Literary Devices

The verse employs Divine Intervention as a central literary device, explicitly stating that God was the agent behind the men's loyalty. This elevates the narrative beyond mere human events to a profound theological statement about God's active involvement in history and His meticulous care in establishing His purposes. This direct statement of divine action also functions as Foreshadowing, subtly hinting at the ongoing tension and challenges Saul would face, as not all of Israel would respond with such divinely-inspired loyalty (a point immediately highlighted in the very next verse, 1 Samuel 10:27). Furthermore, the verse uses Contrast implicitly; by highlighting the divinely-touched hearts, it sets a standard against which future responses to Saul's kingship will be measured, particularly those who rejected him. The concise nature of the statement "whose hearts God had touched" functions as a powerful Summary Statement of God's providential care for His chosen leader, encapsulating the supernatural foundation of Saul's initial support.

Theological and Thematic Connections

This verse provides a profound theological insight into God's methods of establishing and sustaining His purposes. It demonstrates that divine appointment is often accompanied by divine enablement, not just for the leader, but for those who are to support the work. God does not merely issue decrees; He actively prepares the hearts and circumstances necessary for His will to be accomplished. The concept of God "touching hearts" underscores His sovereignty over human will and His ability to incline individuals towards His purposes, even in matters of national leadership. This principle extends beyond kingship to all forms of service and obedience within God's kingdom, reminding us that true effectiveness often stems from God's prior work in the hearts of those involved. It is a testament to God's meticulous care in laying foundations, ensuring that His plans are not left to human caprice alone, but are rooted in His divine, internal work within individuals.

Reflection and Application

The account of God touching the hearts of men to support Saul offers a timeless lesson for believers today. It reminds us that God is actively involved in the details of our lives and the unfolding of His kingdom purposes. Whether in leadership roles, ministry, or simply in our daily walk, we often need the willing support and cooperation of others. This verse encourages us to pray for God to "touch hearts"—to incline individuals towards His will, to foster unity, and to provide the necessary resources and human support for His work. It also challenges us to examine our own hearts: are we open to being "touched" by God, to be moved by His Spirit to support His chosen instruments and initiatives, even when it requires personal sacrifice or stepping outside our comfort zone? Our willingness to serve and support is ultimately a response to God's prior work within us. True spiritual effectiveness is not solely dependent on human effort or charisma, but on God's sovereign and supernatural work in the hearts of people, enabling them to fulfill their part in His grand design, demonstrating that God's power is made perfect in our weakness.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life or ministry am I relying solely on human effort, rather than praying for God to "touch hearts" and provide divine enablement?
  2. How might God be calling me to be one of those whose heart He has touched, to support a leader or initiative that is part of His plan?
  3. What does it mean for my heart to be "touched" by God, and how can I cultivate a greater openness to His divine influence and leading?
  4. Considering Saul's later failures, what does this verse teach us about the importance of sustained obedience and reliance on God, even after an initial divine blessing or provision?

FAQ

Who were these "band of men" and why were they significant?

The "band of men" (Hebrew: חַיִל, chayil) were not merely a random group but a capable, loyal contingent, likely forming the initial core of Saul's personal guard or trusted advisors. Their significance lies in the fact that their loyalty was divinely ordained. In a time of transition from tribal rule to monarchy, a king needed immediate, reliable support to establish his authority. These men, whose hearts God had touched, provided that crucial foundation, demonstrating God's active provision for the nascent monarchy and distinguishing divinely-appointed leadership from mere human ambition. They represented the essential human element God provided for the new kingdom's stability.

What does it mean that "God had touched" their hearts?

This phrase signifies a direct, sovereign, and internal work of God upon the wills and affections of these men. It's not a superficial emotional response but a deep, spiritual inclination. In biblical thought, the "heart" is the center of one's intellect, will, and moral character. Therefore, God's "touch" means He supernaturally influenced their deepest convictions, making them willing and loyal supporters of Saul. This divine intervention ensured that Saul's initial support was rooted in God's plan, rather than solely on human popularity or political maneuvering. It's an example of God preparing the way for His chosen instruments, demonstrating His absolute sovereignty over human volition.

How does this verse relate to Saul's later disobedience and rejection as king?

This verse highlights God's initial, gracious provision and endorsement of Saul's kingship. It demonstrates that Saul began his reign with divine favor and the necessary human support, supernaturally provided. However, Saul's later failures, as detailed throughout 1 Samuel, stemmed from his own disobedience, pride, and lack of full reliance on God's commands, rather than a lack of initial divine support. This verse underscores that while God provides the foundation and the means, human responsibility for obedience remains paramount. Even a divinely appointed leader with God-given support can forfeit favor through unfaithfulness, illustrating the ongoing need for a humble and obedient heart before the Lord, for "to obey is better than sacrifice" (1 Samuel 15:22).

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The establishment of Saul's kingdom, marked by God touching the hearts of men to provide loyal support, beautifully foreshadows the ultimate, eternal kingdom of God established by Jesus Christ. While Saul was a king chosen by God for a specific historical purpose, his reign was temporary and flawed, ultimately ending in failure. Jesus, however, is the true and eternal King, the Son of David, whose kingdom is "an everlasting kingdom" (Daniel 7:27). Just as God touched the hearts of men for Saul, the Holy Spirit, sent by Christ, supernaturally touches the hearts of individuals, drawing them to repentance and faith in Him. No one can come to Jesus unless the Father draws them (John 6:44). This divine work of regeneration, where God gives us a new heart and puts a new spirit within us (Ezekiel 36:26), creates a people whose hearts are truly "touched" by God, not merely for earthly allegiance but for eternal salvation and service in His spiritual kingdom. The church, the body of Christ, is comprised of those whose hearts God has touched, enabling them to willingly follow their King and build His imperishable kingdom, which is "righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit" (Romans 14:17). This divine drawing and transformation of the heart is the very essence of salvation, a far greater "touch" than that experienced by Saul's initial band of men.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 10:17–27. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under comment1 Samuel 10:17–27
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Saul's nomination to the throne is here made public, in a general assembly of the elders of Israel, the representatives of their respective tribes at Mizpeh. It is probable that this convention of the states was called as soon as conveniently it might, after Saul was anointed, for, if there must be a change in their government, the sooner the better: it might be of bad consequence to be long in the doing. The people having met in a solemn assembly, in which God was in a peculiar manner present (and therefore it is said they were called together unto the Lord, Sa1 10:17), Samuel acts for God among them.

I.He reproves them for casting off the government of a prophet, and desiring that of a captain.

1.He shows them (Sa1 10:18) how happy they had been under the divine government; when God ruled them, he delivered them out of the hand of those that oppressed them, and what would they desire more? Could the mightiest man of valour do that for them which the Almighty God had done?

2.He likewise shows them (Sa1 10:19) what an affront they had put upon God (who had himself saved them out of all their tribulations, by his own power, and by such as he had immediately called and qualified) in desiring a king to save them. He tells them in plain terms, "You have this day rejected your God; you have in effect done it: so he construes it, and he might justly, for your so doing, reject you." Those that can live better by sense than by faith, that stay themselves upon an arm of flesh rather than upon the almighty arm, forsake a fountain of living waters for broken cisterns. And some make their obstinacy in this matter to be a presage of their rejecting Christ, in casting off whom they cast off God, that he should not reign over them.

II.He puts them upon choosing their king by lot.

He knew whom God had chosen, and had already anointed him, but he knew also the peevishness of that people, and that there were those among them who would not acquiesce in the choice if it depended upon his single testimony; and therefore, that every tribe and every family of the chosen tribe might please themselves with having a chance for it, he calls them to the lot, Sa1 10:19. Benjamin is taken out of all the tribes (Sa1 10:20), and out of that tribe Saul the son of Kish, Sa1 10:21. By this method it would appear to the people, as it already appeared to Samuel, that Saul was appointed of God to be king; for the disposal of the lot is of the Lord. It would also prevent all disputes and exceptions; for the lot causeth contentions to cease, and parteth between the mighty. When the tribe of Benjamin was taken, they might easily foresee that they were setting up a family that would soon be put down again; for dying Jacob had, by the spirit of prophecy, entailed the dominion upon Judah. Judah is the tribe that must rule as a lion; Benjamin shall only ravin as a wolf, Gen 49:10, Gen 49:27. Those therefore that knew the scriptures could not be very fond of the doing of that which they foresaw must, ere long, be undone again.

III.It is with much ado, and not without further enquiries of the Lord, that Saul is at length produced.

When the lot fell upon him, every one expected he should answer to his name at the first call, but, instead of that, none of his friends could find him (Sa1 10:21), he had hidden himself among the stuff (Sa1 10:22), so little fond was he now of that power which yet, when he was in possession of, he could not without the utmost indignation think of parting with.

1.He withdrew, in hopes that, upon his not appearing, they would proceed to another choice, or thus to express his modesty; for, by what had already passed, he knew he must be the man. We may suppose he was at this time really averse to take upon him the government,

(1.)Because he was conscious to himself of unfitness for so great a trust. He had not been bred up to books, or arms, or courts, and feared he should be guilty of some fatal blunder.

(2.)Because it would expose him to the envy of his neighbours that were ill-affected towards him.

(3.)Because he understood, by what Samuel had said, that the people sinned in asking a king, and it was in anger that God granted their request.

(4.)Because the affairs of Israel were at this time in a bad posture; the Philistines were strong, the Ammonites threatening: and he must be bold indeed that will set sail in a storm.

2.But the congregation, believing that choice well made which God himself made, would leave no way untried to find him out on whom the lot fell. They enquired of the Lord, either by the high priest, and his breast-plate of judgment, or by Samuel, and his spirit of prophecy; and the Lord directed them where they should find him, hidden among the carriages, and thence they fetched him, Sa1 10:23. Note, None will be losers at last by their humility and modesty. Honour, like the shadow, follows those that flee from it, but flees from those that pursue it.

IV.Samuel presents him to the people, and they accept him.

He needed not to mount the bench, or scaffold, to be seen; when he stood upon even ground with the rest he was seen above them all, for he was taller than any of them by head and shoulders, Sa1 10:23. "Look you," said Samuel, "what a king God has chosen for you, just such a one as you wished for; there is none like him among all the people, that has so much majesty in his countenance and such a graceful stateliness in his mien; he is in the crowd like a cedar among the shrubs. Let your own eyes be judges, is he not a brave and gallant man?" The people hereupon signified their approbation of the choice, and their acceptance of him; they shouted and said, Let the king live, that is, "Let him long reign over us in health and prosperity." Subjects were wont to testify their affection and allegiance to their prince by their good wishes, and those turned (as our translation does this) into addresses to God. Psa 72:15, Prayer shall be made for him continually. See Psa 20:1. Samuel had told them they would soon be weary of their king, but, in the mind they are now in, they will never be so: Let the king live.

V.Samuel settles the original contract between them, and leaves it upon record, Sa1 10:25.

He had before told them the manner of the king (Sa1 8:11), how he would abuse his power; now he tells them the manner of the kingdom, or rather the law, or judgment, or constitution, of it, what power the prince might challenge and the utmost of the property the subject might claim. He fixed the land-marks between them, that neither might encroach upon the other. Let them rightly understand one another at first, and let the agreement remain in black and white, which will tend to preserve a good understanding between them ever after. The learned bishop Patrick thinks he now repeated and registered what he had told them (Sa1 8:11) of the arbitrary power their kings would assume, that it might hereafter be a witness against them that they had drawn the calamity upon themselves, for they were warned what it would come to and yet they would have a king.

VI.The convention was dissolved when the solemnity was over:

Samuel sent every man to his house. Here were no votes passed, nor, for aught that appears, so much as a motion made, for the raising of money to support the dignity of their new-elected king; if therefore he afterwards thinks fit to take what they do not think fit to give (which yet it was necessary that he should have), they must thank themselves. They went every man to his house, pleased with the name of a king over them, and Saul also went home to Gibeah, to his father's house, not puffed up with the name of a kingdom under him. At Gibeah he had no palace, no throne, no court, yet thither he goes. If he must be a king, as one mindful of the rock out of which he was hewn, he will make his own city the royal city, nor will he be ashamed (as too many are when they are preferred) of his mean relations. Such a humble spirit as this puts a beauty and lustre upon great advancements. The condition rising, and the mind not rising with it, behold how good and pleasant it is! But,

1.How did the people stand affected to their new king? The generality of them, it should seem, did not show themselves much concerned: They went every man to his own house. Their own domestic affairs lay nearer their hearts than any interests of the public; this was the general temper. But,

(1.)There were some so faithful as to attend him: A band of men whose hearts God had touched, Sa1 10:26. Not the body of the people, but a small company, who because they were fond of their own choice of a king, or because they had so much more sense than their neighbours as to conclude that if he was a king he ought to be respected accordingly, went with him to Gibeah, as his life-guard. They were those whose hearts God had touched, in this instance, to do their duty. Note, Whatever good there is in us, or is done by us, at any time, it must be ascribed to the grace of God. If the heart bend at any time the right way, it is because he has touched it. One touch is enough, when it is divine.

(2.)There were others so spiteful as to affront him; children of Belial, men that would endure no yoke, that would be pleased with nothing that either God or Samuel did; they despised him (Sa1 10:27) for the meanness of his tribe and family, the smallness of his estate, and the privacy of his education; and they said, How shall this man save us? Yet they did not propose any man more likely; nor, whomsoever they had, must their salvation come from the man, but from God. They would not join with their neighbours in testifying an affection to him and his government, by bringing him presents, or addressing him upon his accession to the crown. Perhaps those discontented spirits were most earnest for a king, and yet, now that they had one, they quarrelled with him, because he was not altogether such a one as themselves. It was reason enough for them not to like him because others did. Thus differently are men affected to our exalted Redeemer. God hath set him king upon the holy hill of Sion. There is a remnant that submit to him, rejoice in him, bring him presents, and follow him wherever he goes; and they are those whose hearts God has touched, whom he has made willing in the day of his power. But there are others who despise him, who ask, How shall this man save us? They are offended in him, stumble at his external meanness, and they will be broken by it.

2.How did Saul resent the bad conduct of those that were disaffected to his government? He held his peace. Margin, He was as though he had been deaf. He was so far from resenting it that he seemed not to take notice of it, which was an evidence of his humility and modesty, and the mercifulness of his disposition, and also that he was well satisfied with his title to the crown; for those are commonly most jealous of their honour, and most revengeful of affronts, that gain their power by improper means. Christ held his peace when he was affronted, for it was the day of his patience; but there is a day of recompence coming.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 430
AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourcePREDESTINATION OF THE SAINTS 20.42
In vain also do they object that what we have established from Scripture in the books of Kings [which includes Samuel] and Chronicles—that when God wills the accomplishment of something which ought not to be done except by people who will it, their hearts will be inclined to will this, with God producing this inclination, who in a marvelous and ineffable way works also in us that we will—is not pertinent to the subject with which we are dealing. What else is this but to contradict without saying anything? Unless perhaps they gave you some explanation of why it seems this way to them, but you have chosen not to mention it in your letters. But what that explanation could be, I do not know. Do our brothers perhaps think that because we have shown that God so acted in the human hearts and led the wills of those whom it pleased him to lead, that Saul or David was established as king, these examples are not pertinent to the subject, since it is one thing to reign temporally in this world and another to reign eternally with God? Do they suppose, accordingly, that God moves the wills of those whom he has wished to the creation of earthly kingdoms but that he does not move them to the attainment of a heavenly kingdom?
AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceADMONITION AND GRACE 14.45
Accordingly, there is no doubt that human wills cannot resist the will of God, “who has done whatever he pleased in heaven and on earth,” and who has even “done the things that are to come.” Nor can the human will prevent him from doing what he wills, seeing that even with human wills he does what he wills, when he wills to do it. Take, for instance, the case of Saul. When God willed to give the kingdom to Saul, was it in the power of the Israelites to subject themselves to him or not to subject themselves? In a sense, yes; but not in such a way that they were able to resist God himself. As a matter of fact, God carried the matter through by means of the wills of people themselves, having, as he undoubtedly does, the almighty power to bend human hearts in whatever direction he pleases. So it is written: “And Samuel sent away all the people, everyone to his own house. Saul also departed to his own house in Gibeah; and there went with him a part of the army, whose hearts God had touched. But the children of Belial said, ‘Shall this fellow be able to save us?’ And they despised him, and brought him no presents.” Surely, no one will say that any of the children of Belial, whose hearts God had not so touched, did go with him.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 10:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8