Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But the children of Benjamin gathered themselves together out of the cities unto Gibeah, to go out to battle against the children of Israel.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But the children H1121 of Benjamin H1144 gathered themselves together H622 out of the cities H5892 unto Gibeah H1390, to go out H3318 to battle H4421 against the children H1121 of Israel H3478.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Instead the people of Binyamin gathered themselves together from their cities and went to Giv'ah to fight the people of Isra'el.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And from their cities they came together at Gibeah to go out and fight against the Israelites.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the children of Benjamin gathered themselves together out of the cities unto Gibeah, to go out to battle against the children of Israel.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The children of Benjamin gathered themselves together out of the cities to Gibeah, to go out to battle against the children of Israel.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But ye children of Beniamin gathered them selues together out of the cities vnto Gibeah, to come out and fight against the children of Israel.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and the sons of Benjamin are gathered out of the cities to Gibeah, to go out to battle with the sons of Israel.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Sins of the Benjaminites
Sins of the Benjaminites View full PDF
Judges and Enemies Overview
Judges and Enemies Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,069 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 20:14 marks a pivotal and tragic moment in Israel's history, detailing the tribe of Benjamin's defiant mobilization from their various cities to Gibeah. This unified gathering was not in defense of national borders or a righteous cause, but a deliberate and shocking decision to wage war against the other tribes of Israel, who had assembled to demand justice for the heinous crime committed in Gibeah. This verse thus sets the grim stage for an unprecedented and devastating civil conflict, powerfully illustrating the profound moral decay, fractured unity, and spiritual anarchy that characterized Israel during the period of the Judges.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 20:14 immediately follows the horrific events of Judges chapter 19, a narrative often considered one of the darkest passages in the Old Testament. A Levite's concubine was brutally gang-raped and murdered by depraved men in Gibeah, a city within the tribal territory of Benjamin. In a desperate and shocking plea for justice, the Levite dismembered her body and sent a piece to each of the twelve tribes of Israel. This act galvanized the other tribes, who, appalled by the atrocity, assembled at Mizpah, demanding that Benjamin surrender the perpetrators from Gibeah for punishment. However, Judges 20:13 reveals Benjamin's outright refusal to comply with this righteous demand, choosing instead to protect the wicked men. Judges 20:14 then describes Benjamin's active and defiant preparation for war, escalating the conflict from a demand for justice into an all-out civil war, showcasing the depths of depravity and disunity that plagued Israel.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Judges 20 unfold during the tumultuous period of the Judges, a time notoriously characterized by a lack of central authority, widespread spiritual apostasy, and rampant moral relativism. The recurring refrain, "In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes," found in passages like Judges 17:6 and Judges 21:25, perfectly encapsulates the societal breakdown. While tribal loyalty was a foundational aspect of Israelite identity, in this instance, Benjamin's allegiance to their kinsmen, even those guilty of egregious sin, tragically superseded their covenantal obligations to God and the broader Israelite community. The concept of corporate responsibility was deeply ingrained in ancient Israelite culture, meaning the entire tribe could be held accountable for unpunished sins committed within its territory. Gibeah, a Benjaminite city, thus became a symbol of this moral decay and the flashpoint for the impending, unprecedented conflict.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes pervasive throughout the Book of Judges, particularly those introduced in Judges chapter 1. First, it highlights the theme of Defiance and Misplaced Loyalty, as Benjamin defiantly prioritizes tribal solidarity over divine justice and righteousness, setting themselves in direct opposition to the rest of God's people. Second, it starkly underscores the devastating consequences of Internal Conflict and Civil War within a divinely chosen nation, demonstrating how unaddressed sin can rupture the very fabric of society and lead to self-destruction. Third, it vividly illustrates the Consequences of Unrighteousness, showing that protecting sin rather than confronting it leads to widespread destruction and divine judgment. Finally, and implicitly, it amplifies the urgent need for a Righteous King who would enforce justice, maintain covenantal unity, and lead Israel in obedience to God's law—a desperate need acutely felt throughout the chaotic narrative of Judges.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • gathered themselves together (Hebrew, ʼâçaph', H622): This verb (H622) signifies a deliberate and intentional assembly for a specific purpose, emphasizing the Benjaminites' conscious and unified choice to mobilize for conflict. It implies a determined and collective stance, not a reluctant or forced conscription. Their gathering was an act of defiance, a unified decision to stand in opposition to the righteous demands of the other tribes of Israel.
  • children of Benjamin (Hebrew, bên_ _Binyâmîyn', H1121): This phrase (H1121, H1144) highlights the tribal identity and collective nature of the decision. "Binyâmîyn" means "son of (the) right hand," and "bên" refers to a son, often in a collective sense like "children" or "posterity." This underscores the tragic irony that the "sons" of one of Israel's tribes are preparing to fight against the "children of Israel" (H1121, H3478)—their own brethren. This emphasizes the profound breakdown of the covenantal unity that was meant to bind all the tribes together as one people under God.
  • to go out to battle (Hebrew, _yâtsâʼ _milchâmâh'__, H3318): This active and purposeful phrase (H3318, H4421) clarifies the Benjaminites' intent. "Yâtsâʼ" means "to go out" or "proceed," and "milchâmâh" means "battle" or "warfare." They were not merely defending their borders or negotiating; their objective was explicitly to engage in warfare. This reveals the depth of their commitment to protecting the perpetrators and their willingness to shed the blood of fellow Israelites, a stark violation of the covenant and a testament to their hardened hearts.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But the children of Benjamin": The conjunction "But" immediately signals a sharp contrast and opposition to the preceding narrative, where the other tribes of Israel had assembled and righteously demanded justice. It sets Benjamin apart as the dissenting and defiant party, highlighting their unique and rebellious stance against the collective will of their brethren. This emphasizes their tribal identity as the source of this resistance, a loyalty misplaced above divine law.
  • "gathered themselves together out of the cities unto Gibeah": This clause describes the strategic and unified mobilization of the Benjaminite forces. They converged from various cities within their tribal territory, consolidating their strength at Gibeah. Gibeah, already infamous as the site of the horrific crime in Judges 19, now becomes the rallying point for their defiant stand, symbolizing their solidarity with the wicked inhabitants and their outright rejection of justice.
  • "to go out to battle against the children of Israel": This final phrase reveals the shocking and tragic purpose of their gathering. Their intent was not to surrender the guilty or seek reconciliation, but to wage war. The target of their aggression was "the children of Israel"—their own covenantal family, the very people with whom they shared a divine heritage and a common God. This underscores the unprecedented nature of the conflict as a civil war, a profound internal rupture within God's chosen people, born out of unaddressed sin and tragically misplaced loyalty.

Literary Devices

Judges 20:14 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its tragic message and underscore the gravity of the situation. The most prominent is Irony, as the "children of Benjamin," a tribe of Israel, prepare to fight "the children of Israel," the broader covenant community. This internal conflict among God's chosen people is deeply ironic, as they were called to be a unified nation under Yahweh, not a fractured one. The verse also serves as a strong Foreshadowing, ominously hinting at the horrific and devastating civil war that will ensue, leading to immense casualties and the near annihilation of the tribe of Benjamin. Furthermore, there is a clear Contrast established between the other tribes' pursuit of justice and Benjamin's defiant protection of sin, highlighting the moral chasm that has opened within Israel. Finally, Synecdoche is at play, where "the children of Benjamin" represents the entire tribe and its collective decision, just as "Gibeah" stands in for the epicenter of both the initial crime and the subsequent, defiant resistance.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 20:14 serves as a stark theological commentary on the profound dangers of unaddressed sin and misplaced loyalty within a covenant community. It illustrates that when a people abandon God's standards of justice and righteousness, even tribal bonds, which are meant to foster unity, can become instruments of destruction. Benjamin's refusal to surrender the wicked reveals a deep spiritual blindness and a prioritizing of human allegiance over divine law, leading to a catastrophic internal conflict. This event underscores the principle that sin, when protected and left unpunished, does not remain localized but metastasizes, corrupting the entire body and leading to widespread judgment and devastation. It is a powerful reminder that true unity is built upon truth and righteousness, not on the compromise or protection of evil, and that God's people are called to uphold His justice above all human allegiances.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The narrative of Judges 20:14 offers profound and sobering lessons for contemporary believers and communities. Benjamin's tragic choice to protect sin rather than confront it serves as a powerful cautionary tale against the dangers of misplaced loyalty and tribalism. It challenges us to examine our own allegiances: are we more committed to protecting our "own" (family, friends, church group, political affiliation) even when they are in the wrong, or are we committed first and foremost to justice, truth, and God's righteousness? This verse reminds us that true love and loyalty sometimes require confronting uncomfortable truths and holding others accountable, even when it is painful or unpopular. The failure to address sin within our midst, whether personally or corporately, can lead to far greater destruction and division than the initial confrontation might have caused. We are called to be a people who value righteousness and peace, understanding that genuine unity is forged in the crucible of truth and accountability, not through the compromise of moral principles or the perpetuation of injustice.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Benjamin's misplaced loyalty challenge our own allegiances, especially when those we care about are involved in wrongdoing or injustice?
  • In what ways might we, individually or corporately, be tempted to protect sin or avoid confronting it, rather than seeking justice and truth in accordance with God's Word?
  • What is the true cost of division within a community or church when truth and justice are compromised for the sake of perceived unity or tribalism?

FAQ

Why didn't Benjamin just hand over the perpetrators from Gibeah?

Answer: Benjamin's refusal to hand over the perpetrators stemmed primarily from a misguided sense of tribal solidarity, pride, and a profound moral blindness. Instead of acknowledging the heinous crime committed within their territory and upholding the broader covenantal law of Israel, they chose to protect their own kinsmen, regardless of their undeniable guilt. This decision reflects the deep moral decay prevalent in the period of the Judges, where "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 17:6; Judges 21:25). Their loyalty to their tribe superseded their loyalty to God's law and the unity of Israel, leading to a catastrophic refusal to submit to the righteous demands of the other tribes and ultimately initiating a devastating civil war.

What does this event tell us about the period of the Judges?

Answer: Judges 20:14 and the ensuing civil war vividly illustrate the profound spiritual and moral anarchy that characterized the period of the Judges. It demonstrates the devastating consequences of a decentralized nation without a righteous king or strong spiritual leadership, where individual tribes and even cities operated according to their own corrupt standards. The events reveal a complete breakdown of justice, covenantal unity, and moral discernment among God's people. The willingness of one tribe to defend egregious sin and wage war against its own brethren underscores the depth of Israel's apostasy and their desperate need for a true leader who would establish justice and restore order, pointing forward to the eventual establishment of the monarchy as a divine provision for their chaotic state.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic civil war initiated by Benjamin's defiance in Judges 20:14, born out of unaddressed sin and misplaced loyalty, finds its ultimate resolution and antithesis in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. The "children of Benjamin" chose to defend sin and wage war against their own brethren, leading to division and near-annihilation. In stark contrast, Jesus, the true King of Israel and the Son of God, came not to protect sin but to confront it and ultimately to bear its full penalty. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offering Himself as the perfect, atoning sacrifice, thereby preventing the divine judgment that sin justly deserves. Unlike Benjamin, who fostered division and bloodshed among God's people, Christ's mission was to bring profound unity. He broke down the dividing wall of hostility, reconciling estranged parties and creating one new humanity in Himself, Jew and Gentile alike (Ephesians 2:14-16), a stark contrast to the fractured Israel of the Judges. He is the righteous King Israel desperately needed, the one who establishes justice and peace, and whose kingdom, unlike the divided house of Israel, "will never be destroyed" (Daniel 2:44). Through His cross, He reconciles estranged parties, bringing together those who were once at war with God and with one another, fulfilling the promise of true unity and justice that tragically eluded Israel in the time of the Judges.

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 20 verses 12–17

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here is, I. The fair and just demand which the tribes of Israel, now encamped, sent to the tribe of Benjamin, to deliver up the malefactors of Gibeah to justice, Jdg 20:12, Jdg 20:13. If the tribe of Benjamin had come up, as they ought to have done, to the assembly, and agreed with them in their resolution, there would have been none to deal with but the men of Gibeah only, but they, by their absence, taking part with the criminals, application must be made to them all. The Israelites were zealous against the wickedness that was committed, yet they were discreet in their zeal, and did not think it would justify them in falling upon the whole tribe of Benjamin unless they, by refusing to give up the criminals, and protecting them against justice, should make themselves guilty, ex post facto - as accessaries after the fact. They desire them to consider how great the wickedness was that was committed (Jdg 20:12), and that it was done among them: and how necessary it was therefore that they should either punish the malefactors with death themselves, according to the law of Moses, or deliver them up to the general assembly, to be so much the more publicly and solemnly punished, that evil might be put away from Israel, the national guilt removed, the infection stopped by cutting off the gangrened part, and national judgments prevented; for the sin was so very like that of the Sodomites that they might justly fear, if they did not punish it, God would rain hail from heaven upon them, as he did, not only upon Sodom, but the neighbouring cities. If the Israelites had not made this reasonable demand, they would have had much more reason to lament the following desolations of Benjamin. All methods of accommodation must be used before we go to war or go to law. The demand was like that of Joab's to Abel, Sa2 20:20, Sa2 20:21. "Only deliver up the traitor, and we will lay down our arms." On these terms, and no other, God will be at peace with us, that we part with our sins, that we mortify and crucify our lusts, and then all shall be well; his anger will be turned away.

II. The wretched obstinacy and perverseness of the men of Benjamin, who seem to have been as unanimous and zealous in their resolutions to stand by the criminals as the rest of the tribes were to punish them, so little sense had they of their honour, duty, and interest. 1. They were so prodigiously vile as to patronise the wickedness that was committed: They would not hearken to the voice of their brethren (Jdg 20:13), either because those of that tribe were generally more vicious and debauched at this time than the rest of the tribes, and therefore would not bear to have that punished in others of which they knew themselves guilty (some of the most fruitful and pleasant parts of Canaan fell to the lot of this tribe; their land, like that of Sodom, was as the garden of the Lord, which perhaps helped to make the inhabitants, like the men of Sodom, wicked, and sinners before the Lord exceedingly, Gen 13:10, Gen 13:13), or because (as bishop Patrick suggests) they took it ill that the other tribes should meddle with their concerns; they would not do that which they knew was their duty because they were reminded of it by their brethren, by whom they scorned to be taught and controlled. If there were any wise men among them that would have complied with the demand made, yet they were overpowered by the majority, who thus made the crime of the men of Gibeah their own. Thus we have fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness if we say A confederacy with those that have, and make ourselves guilty of other men's sins by countenancing and defending them. It seems there is no cause so bad but it will find some patrons, some advocates, to appear for it; but woe be to those by whom such offences come. Those will have a great deal to answer for that obstruct the course of necessary justice, and strengthen the hands of the wicked, by saying, O wicked man! thou shalt not die.

2.They were so prodigiously vain and presumptuous as to make head against the united force of all Israel. Never, surely, were men so wretchedly infatuated as they were when they took up arms in opposition, (1.) To so good a cause as Israel had. How could they expect to prosper when they fought against justice, and consequently against the just God himself, against those that had the high priest and the divine oracle on their side, and so acted in downright rebellion against the sacred and supreme authority of the nation. (2.) To so great a force as Israel had. The disproportion of their numbers was much greater than that, Luk 14:31, Luk 14:32, where he that had but 10,000 durst not meet him that came against him with 20,000, and therefore desired conditions of peace. There the enemy was but two to one, here above fifteen to one; yet they despised conditions of peace. All the forces they could bring into the field were but 26,000 men, besides 700 men of Gibeah (Jdg 20:15); yet with these they will dare to face 400,000 men of Israel, Jdg 20:17. Thus sinners are infatuated to their own ruin, and provoke him to jealousy who is infinitely stronger than they, Co1 10:22. But it should seem they depended upon the skill of their men to make up what was wanting in numbers, especially a regiment of slingers, 700 men, who, though left-handed, were so dexterous at slinging stones that they would not be a hair's breadth beside their mark, Jdg 20:16. But these good marksmen were very much out in their aim when they espoused this bad cause. Benjamin signifies the son of the right hand, yet we find his posterity left-handed.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 12–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 20:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.