Skip to content

Matthew 12:25

“The Beelzebul Controversy and Blasphemy”Matthew 12:22–37
King James Version
And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 Jesus G2424 knew G1492 their G846 thoughts G1761, and said G2036 unto them G846, Every G3956 kingdom G932 divided G3307 against G2596 itself G1438 is brought to desolation G2049; and G2532 every G3956 city G4172 or G2228 house G3614 divided G3307 against G2596 itself G1438 shall G2476 not G3756 stand G2476:

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Knowing their thoughts, Jesus said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself will be laid waste, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And knowing their thoughts he said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Knowing their thoughts, Yeshua said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
But Iesus knew their thoughtes, and said to them, Euery kingdome deuided against it selfe, is brought to nought: and euery citie or house, deuided against it selfe, shall not stand.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And Jesus, knowing their thoughts, said to them, `Every kingdom having been divided against itself is desolated, and no city or house having been divided against itself, doth stand,

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
25 Greek words
  1. ΕἰδὼςEidōsknowingG1492V-RAP-NSMVerb Perfect Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  2. δὲdenowG1161CONJConjunction
  3. ὁho[the]G3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  4. ἸησοῦςIēsousJesusG2424N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  5. τὰςtastheG3588T-APFDefinite article Accusative Plural Feminine
  6. ἐνθυμήσειςenthumēseisthoughtsG1761N-APFNoun Accusative Plural Feminine
  7. αὐτῶνautōnof themG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
  8. εἶπενeipenHe saidG2036V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  9. αὐτοῖς·autoisto themG846P-DPMPersonal pronoun Dative Plural Masculine
  10. πᾶσαpasaEveryG3956A-NSFAdjective Nominative Singular Feminine
  11. βασιλείαbasileiakingdomG932N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
  12. μερισθεῖσαmeristheisahaving been dividedG3307V-APP-NSFVerb Aorist Passive Participle Nominative Singular Feminine
  13. καθ᾽kath᾽againstG2596PREPPreposition
  14. ἑαυτῆςhe'autēsitselfG1438F-3GSFReflexive pronoun Genitive 3rd Singular Feminine
  15. ἐρημοῦταιerēmoutaiis brought to desolationG2049V-PPI-3SVerb Present Passive Indicative 3rd Singular
  16. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  17. πᾶσαpasaeveryG3956A-NSFAdjective Nominative Singular Feminine
  18. πόλιςpoliscityG4172N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
  19. ἢēorG2228CONJConjunction
  20. οἰκίαoikiahouseG3614N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
  21. μερισθεῖσαmeristheisahaving been dividedG3307V-APP-NSFVerb Aorist Passive Participle Nominative Singular Feminine
  22. καθ᾽kath᾽againstG2596PREPPreposition
  23. ἑαυτῆςhe'autēsitselfG1438F-3GSFReflexive pronoun Genitive 3rd Singular Feminine
  24. οὐounotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  25. σταθήσεταιstathēsetaiwill standG2476V-FPI-3SVerb Future Passive Indicative 3rd Singular
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Matthew Sites (Levant)
All Matthew Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Matthew Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Matthew Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 23,515 of 31,102 · 75.6%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Knowing their thoughts, Jesus answers that any kingdom, city or household divided against itself is brought to ruin.

“And Jesus knew their thoughts,”

He answers their hidden reasoning (enthýmēsis) as well as their words.

“and said unto them,”

He answers openly, to their faces.

“Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation;”

Inner conflict lays a kingdom waste.

“and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:”

The same holds for a city and for a household or family.

By the Spirit of God, the Kingdom Has Come

Matthew 12:22–37

Summary

A man who is blind, dumb and possessed with a devil is brought to Jesus, and Jesus heals him so completely that he both speaks and sees. The crowd begins to wonder whether Jesus is the son of David. The Pharisees answer that he casts out devils by Beelzebub, the prince of the devils. Jesus, knowing their thoughts, shows that Satan would be destroying his own kingdom if he cast out Satan, that their own exorcists will judge them, and that he drives out devils by the Spirit of God, which means the kingdom of God has come. He has bound the strong man and is taking back the people Satan held. Then he warns that every person stands either with him or against him, that blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven, and that the words people speak come out of their hearts and will be judged.

A blind and dumb man set free

Matthew sets this healing in a chapter of rising conflict (Matthew 12). Jesus has defended his disciples for plucking grain on the Sabbath and healed a man with a withered hand in the synagogue, and both have hardened the Pharisees against him (Matthew 12:1–14). Matthew then applies Isaiah’s servant prophecy to Jesus, “I will put my spirit upon him” (Matthew 12:18), which prepares for what Jesus says in verse 28 about casting out devils “by the Spirit of God”.

The man is “possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb”. The verb daimonízomai means to be under the power of a demon, and in this man that bondage showed itself in his body. Typhlós is the ordinary word for blind, which Strong’s explains from a word for opaque, as if smoky. Kōphós means unable to speak, and the word often covers deafness as well. People in that day often linked such afflictions with sin or with demons, and Jesus corrected the easy link between sickness and sin in the case of the man born blind (John 9:1–3). In this case the verse itself joins the blindness and dumbness to the possession, and all three end together when Jesus heals him, so they are rightly read as the devil’s work in this one man.

Matthew says simply “he healed him”, with the verb therapeúō, which here covers the whole deliverance: the devil driven out and the senses restored. “Insomuch that” (hṓste) gives the result, and the man who had been blind and dumb “both spake and saw”. The healing was immediate, complete and public.

Matthew has already told of a dumb man possessed with a devil who was brought to Jesus (Matthew 9:32–34), and Luke tells this healing together with the dispute that follows (Luke 11:14–23). Isaiah had promised a day when “the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped. Then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing” (Isaiah 35:5–6), and here two of those signs happen to one man in a moment. Peter later summed up the ministry of Jesus in the same terms: God anointed him “with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him” (Acts 10:38).

What Jesus did for this man’s eyes and tongue he does for the hearts of his people. He came to set captives free (Luke 4:18–19). God has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of his glory in the face of Jesus Christ (2 Corinthians 4:6), and he has called us out of darkness into his marvellous light, to show forth his praises (1 Peter 2:9).

“Is not this the son of David?”

The crowd, the óchlos or common people, “were amazed”. Exístēmi means to be put out of one’s wits, astounded, almost beside oneself. Their question opens in Greek with mḗti, which makes it tentative, the question of people who hardly dare to say what they half suspect.

Son of David (huiós, “son”, with Dabíd, “David”) was a royal and messianic title. God promised David a descendant whose throne and kingdom he would establish for ever (2 Samuel 7:12–16), and Isaiah foretold a child who would reign on David’s throne with a government that would keep on growing (Isaiah 9:6–7). Two blind men had already cried, “Thou son of David, have mercy on us” (Matthew 9:27), and the crowds would hail him by this name as he rode into Jerusalem (Matthew 21:9). Many in that day, under Roman rule, hoped for a political or military deliverer, so the people may have pictured something smaller than the truth.

Their guess was right all the same. Jesus is David’s descendant, as the genealogies of Matthew 1:1 and Luke 3:31 show, and his kingdom is greater than any earthly throne, for he said, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). God has delivered us from the power of darkness into the kingdom of his dear Son (Colossians 1:13–14), and every knee will bow to him (Philippians 2:9–11).

The crowd’s wonder sets up the contrast that follows. Ordinary people, moved by what they saw, begin to ask the right question, while the religious leaders who saw the same miracle turn against him.

The charge: “by Beelzebub the prince of the devils”

“But” (dé, a connective that here marks the contrast) turns from the crowd to the Pharisees. What they heard was the people’s question, and it threatened them. They were a strict party devoted to the law of Moses and their traditions, with great influence among the people, and they had already clashed with Jesus over the Sabbath.

They have to admit the miracle, and their own words grant it, because they use the plain verb for driving out devils, ekbállō, “to throw out” or “drive out”, whose prefix gives the direction “out”. So they explain it another way: “This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.” The word “fellow” is supplied by the KJV, and the contempt is in their dismissive “this”.

Beelzebub, in Greek Beelzeboúl, is a name connected with Baal-zebub, the god of Ekron whom King Ahaziah sent to consult (2 Kings 1:2). Strong’s calls the Greek name of Chaldee origin and a parody, rendering it “dung-god”, and it is also explained as “lord of the flies” or “lord of the high dwelling”. By the time of Jesus it named the chief of the demons, and Jesus answers in verse 26 as if it were another name for Satan. To say that Jesus worked by Beelzebub was to call him an agent of the prince of evil, the gravest charge they could bring. Mark tells of the scribes making the same accusation (Mark 3:22–30), Luke says that “some of them said, He casteth out devils through Beelzebub”, and in John’s Gospel the Jews call Jesus a Samaritan who has a devil (John 8:48).

By calling good evil, the Pharisees credit Satan with the work of God’s Spirit, and it is this charge that leads Jesus to his warning about blasphemy against the Holy Ghost in verses 31 and 32.

A kingdom divided against itself

“Jesus knew their thoughts.” The verb eídō properly means to see, and so to know, and enthýmēsis means deliberation, the plans being turned over in the mind. Jesus answers what they are thinking as well as what they have said. Searching the heart belongs to the LORD (Jeremiah 17:10), and the Gospels show Jesus doing it again and again (Matthew 9:4, Luke 6:8).

He answers with something everyone knows. Merízō is to part or divide, and in the passive here it pictures a thing split against itself. Erēmóō is to lay waste or make desolate, and hístēmi is to stand or remain firm. The examples come closer to home as they go, from a kingdom to a city to a household, and the rule holds for each. Civil war ruins a nation, feuding brings down a city, and strife breaks a family apart.

Then he applies it to Satan. The name Satanâs came into Greek from the Aramaic and means the adversary. Basileía, from the word for king, is royal rule and the realm it governs, here the dominion of Satan and the demons under him. Jesus takes the Pharisees’ claim and follows it to its end. If Satan were driving out his own servants, he would be tearing down his own rule, and every ruler works to keep his kingdom. The charge is absurd, so the power at work in Jesus must come from God.

Does Satan really have a kingdom?

Jesus speaks of “his kingdom” as something real. He calls Satan “the prince of this world” (John 12:31), and Paul calls him “the god of this world” (2 Corinthians 4:4). His realm is united in its opposition to God, which is why it holds together against Jesus. It is a created, rebellious realm under God’s sovereign power, and it ends when the devil is cast into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:10). Its downfall comes by the greater power of God.

The house divided and the church

The rule Jesus states reaches beyond this argument. Paul counts divisions among the works of the flesh (Galatians 5:19–21), tells believers to mark and avoid those who cause them (Romans 16:17–18), and appeals to the church to be of one mind (1 Corinthians 1:10). He urges believers to keep “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:1–3) under Christ, who is head over all things to the church (Ephesians 1:22–23), and Jesus prayed that his people “may be one, even as we are one” (John 17:20–23). The same is true of a single heart, which stands firm only when it is whole in its devotion to Christ.

“By whom do your children cast them out?”

Jesus’ second answer turns the charge back on his accusers. The “if” (ei) sets up an argument from their own premise. “Your children” (hymōn, “your”, with huiós, “sons”) means Jewish exorcists of their own circle, perhaps their disciples. Exorcism was practised among the Jews in that day by prayers, incantations or the use of names such as Solomon’s, and the historian Josephus tells of it. The sons of Sceva in Acts were Jewish exorcists of this kind, and the evil spirit they tried to drive out overpowered them (Acts 19:13–16).

The Pharisees let these men work unaccused. If they condemn Jesus for driving out devils (daimónion, the usual word for an evil spirit) and approve the same act in their own people, their verdict on him rests on prejudice. “Therefore they shall be your judges.” A kritḗs is one who judges, and the Pharisees’ own exorcists stand as witnesses against the men who condemn Jesus.

“The kingdom of God is come unto you”

Now Jesus says what is really happening. Pneûma means breath or wind, and so a spirit. Here it is the Spirit of God, who came upon Jesus at his baptism (Matthew 3:16) and of whom Isaiah’s prophecy said, “I will put my spirit upon him”. Luke gives the saying as “if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you” (Luke 11:20).

The verb phthánō means to come before, and to reach or arrive at. Here it says that the kingdom has already arrived and is present among the very people Jesus is speaking to. The basileía of God is his royal rule in action. Matthew usually writes “kingdom of heaven”, and “kingdom of God” appears in his Gospel only here and in Matthew 6:33, 19:24, 21:31 and 21:43.

So every devil cast out is a sign that God’s reign has broken into the world and is driving back the rule of Satan. Jesus had preached from the start, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel” (Mark 1:15), and here that kingdom is at work in front of his hearers. John says the Son of God was manifested to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:8). Daniel foresaw a kingdom set up by the God of heaven which shall never be destroyed (Daniel 2:44), Jesus says elsewhere that the kingdom of God is within you (Luke 17:20–21), and Paul says that Christ must reign until every enemy is under his feet, with death the last to be destroyed (1 Corinthians 15:25–26). The kingdom that came with Jesus will be complete when the kingdoms of this world become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ (Revelation 11:15).

Binding the strong man

Jesus’ third picture is a raid on a house. The strong man (ischyrós, mighty, powerful) is Satan, his house is the realm where he holds people, and his goods (skeuē) are the people he holds captive through sin, spiritual blindness and demonic oppression. To bind (déō) is to tie him up so he can resist no longer, and to spoil (diarpázō) is to plunder what he had.

So when Jesus sets a man free from a devil, he is plundering Satan’s house, and that can only happen if Satan has first been overpowered by someone stronger. Jesus is Satan’s conqueror. Isaiah had promised that even the captives of the mighty would be taken away (Isaiah 49:24–25), and Jesus told his disciples that he had seen Satan fall as lightning from heaven, and gave them power over all the power of the enemy (Luke 10:18–19).

The full binding and spoiling came through his death and resurrection. God promised at the fall that the seed of the woman would bruise the serpent’s head (Genesis 3:15). On the cross Christ “spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it” (Colossians 2:15). Now all power in heaven and in earth is given to him (Matthew 28:18), and he goes on spoiling Satan’s house as people are turned from darkness to light (Acts 26:18).

Does this mean Satan has no power left?

Satan is bound in the sense that his hold is broken and he is limited by God’s purposes, and he still deceives, tempts and oppresses. Paul says we wrestle against principalities and powers (Ephesians 6:12), and James tells believers to resist the devil, with the promise that he will flee (James 4:7). We face him as a defeated enemy, under the authority of the One who has already bound him.

With him or against him

In the middle of this conflict Jesus says that every person stands either with him or against him. Katá with “me” means against, in opposition. Synágō is to gather or bring together, and skorpízō is to scatter, disperse or put to flight. The second line says the first again in a picture. A shepherd gathers his flock and keeps it safe, and scattered sheep are lost and in danger, as when the shepherd is struck and the sheep are scattered (Zechariah 13:7). Israel’s hope of the Messiah included the gathering of God’s scattered people. Luke records the same saying in this same dispute.

Jesus is the true gatherer. He was given as a light to the Gentiles (Isaiah 49:6), he always did what pleased the Father (John 8:29), and by his blood he has redeemed people out of every nation (Revelation 5:9). He builds his church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (Matthew 16:18). At the end the nations will be gathered before him and separated as sheep from goats (Matthew 25:31–46). Joshua once set a choice like this before Israel: “choose you this day whom ye will serve” (Joshua 24:15).

Is everyone outside Christ his enemy?

Jesus first spoke these words to Pharisees who were openly fighting his work, and they reach everyone, because whoever stands outside his kingdom is on the other side, even where there is little open hostility. John says, “he that believeth not is condemned already” (John 3:18). The gospel calls people across to Christ’s side through faith and repentance, and being with him means taking part in his gathering.

The blasphemy against the Holy Ghost

“Wherefore” ties this warning to what the Pharisees have just said, and the warning opens with mercy. “All manner of sin and blasphemy” covers every kind of offence, including evil speaking against God, and aphíēmi, “forgive”, is to send away or release, here to release from the penalty of sin. The blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7), for he is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

Blasphēmía is evil speaking or slander, especially against God. Against the Holy Ghost (pneûma, the word for the Spirit of God in verse 28) it is the one sin Jesus names as beyond forgiveness. Verse 32 says it again with a contrast. Épō is simply to speak or say. Aiṓn is an age, and with méllō, “to come”, the phrase follows the common Jewish way of speaking of this present age and the age to come. The sentence reaches into eternity.

Mark gives the reason Jesus said it: “Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit” (Mark 3:30). Luke records the saying as well (Luke 12:10).

What is the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost?

It is the deliberate, settled and malicious rejection of the Holy Spirit’s plain witness to Jesus, and calling the Spirit’s work the work of Satan is the example in front of us. The Pharisees saw a man freed from a devil by the Spirit of God, could find no way to deny it, and credited it to Satan. This is a heart hardened against the very One who brings people to repentance, the Spirit who convicts the world of sin and glorifies Christ (John 16:8–14). Because it refuses the only way forgiveness comes, it leaves the sinner without a way back. God’s mercy is wide enough for every other sin, and the one who blasphemes the Spirit has shut himself away from it. Hebrews speaks with the same gravity of those who have tasted the heavenly gift and fallen away, and of sinning wilfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth (Hebrews 6:4–6, Hebrews 10:26–31).

Why can a word against the Son of man be forgiven?

“Son of man” is Jesus’ name for himself in his humble, earthly state, when his glory was veiled and people could misunderstand him. Those who spoke against him in ignorance, or even opposed him then, could still repent and be forgiven. The Spirit’s work in this healing was open for all to see, and to call it Satan’s work was to reject God’s clearest witness to his Son.

Can someone who fears they have committed it be forgiven?

Whoever is troubled about this sin and longs for God’s forgiveness shows by that longing that the Spirit is still at work in them. The sin Jesus describes belongs to a heart so hardened that it has lost all wish to repent. Those who are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God (Romans 8:14), and though a believer can grieve the Spirit (Ephesians 4:30) and fall into sin, the settled, malicious rejection Jesus warns of is contrary to the new heart the Spirit gives. Scripture leaves unstated in so many words whether a true believer could commit it, and the nature of the sin itself answers the fear.

The tree is known by his fruit

Jesus now turns from the deed to the hearts of the men who slandered it. Kalós, good, is the word Strong’s describes as good for appearance or use, as distinguished from agathós, good in itself, so it suits a tree whose goodness shows in what it bears. Saprós is rotten or worthless, and ginṓskō is to know or recognise. In this setting the saying answers the charge of verse 24 directly. The fruit was a man set free from a devil, which is good, so the one who did it must be good. At the same time the Pharisees’ own fruit, their slander, shows what kind of tree they are. Jesus taught in the Sermon on the Mount that false prophets are known by their fruits (Matthew 7:15–20), and Luke records the tree and its fruit as well (Luke 6:43–45).

“O generation of vipers”

Génnēma means offspring, and échidna is an adder or other poisonous snake, so Jesus calls them a brood of snakes, men whose words carry poison. John the Baptist had used the same words (Matthew 3:7), and Jesus’ fullest rebuke of the scribes and Pharisees comes later (Matthew 23). “Being evil” (ponērós), they have only evil to bring out, and any good word (agathós) from them would be a mask. The reason follows: perísseuma is abundance or surplus, what fills the heart until it comes out of the mouth. The kardía in Scripture is the centre of a person, the seat of mind, will and moral character as well as feeling, and Proverbs says to keep it with all diligence, “for out of it are the issues of life” (Proverbs 4:23).

The treasure of the heart

Thēsaurós, from the verb to put or place, is a storehouse or the valuables kept in it. The heart is pictured as a store, and what has been laid up there is what comes out. “Bringeth forth” is ekbállō again, the verb used for casting out devils in verses 24 to 28, here in its plain sense of bringing something out. A man’s words and deeds show what is in his store. “The LORD looketh on the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7).

This reaches every one of us. The heart is deceitful above all things (Jeremiah 17:9), and since sin entered the world by one man all have inherited a sinful nature (Romans 5:12), so the natural heart lays up evil treasure. Good treasure comes from God’s work in us. He promised a new heart and a new spirit (Ezekiel 36:26), and whoever is in Christ is a new creature (2 Corinthians 5:17). The inward man is renewed day by day (2 Corinthians 4:16), the Spirit bears his fruit in us (Galatians 5:22–23), and God conforms us to the image of his Son (Romans 8:29), filling us with the fruits of righteousness (Philippians 1:11). Jesus said, “I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing” (John 15:5).

Does this mean good works save us?

Good fruit is the evidence of a heart God has changed, and salvation is by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9). The fruit shows what the tree is, and it is God who makes the tree good.

Every idle word

Argós, idle, is made from a negative prefix and the word for work, and means inactive, idle or useless. It is the word for the labourers “standing idle in the marketplace” (Matthew 20:3). An idle word is careless, empty speech, spoken without thought for its truth or its effect. Rhēma is a word or saying, something actually spoken, and “every” leaves none out. “Give account” joins lógos, which can mean a reckoning, with apodídōmi, to render what is due. The Pharisees’ deliberate slander was grave, and Jesus carries the point further: even careless words come under God’s judgment, because they too come out of the heart. That judgment weighs our speech as a whole, as the overflow of who we are before God.

Solomon says that God shall bring every work into judgment (Ecclesiastes 12:14), and Paul that every one of us shall give account of himself to God (Romans 14:12). “Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof” (Proverbs 18:21). James calls the tongue “an unruly evil, full of deadly poison” and asks whether one fountain can send out both salt water and fresh (James 3:6–12). Paul tells believers to speak what builds others up (Ephesians 4:29).

Verse 37 gives the reason with “For” (gár). “By” translates ek, “out of” or “from”, so the verdict is drawn from the words, and kaí, “and”, sets the two outcomes side by side. Lógos here is the sum of a person’s speech. Dikaióō is to declare or show just, to acquit, and katadikázō is to pronounce guilty. This is the language of a court, and our words are the evidence.

Are we justified by our words?

We are “justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus” (Romans 3:24), and our words are the evidence of the heart he has given. Since the mouth speaks out of the heart, words show whether a heart has been made new by grace or remains in rebellion. Our own words would condemn us, but Christ bore our sins in his own body on the tree (1 Peter 2:24), and there is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus (Romans 8:1). The Father has committed all judgment to the Son (John 5:22), so the One who will weigh our words is the One who justifies us.

The Lord Who Binds, Gathers and Speaks Life

In this passage Jesus stands over every power that holds people captive. The devil who blinded and silenced a man has to leave at his word, because the Spirit of God is upon him and the kingdom of God has come with him. He has bound the strong man, and on the cross he triumphed over all the powers of darkness. He gathers a people for himself, and he holds out forgiveness for every kind of sin and blasphemy.

He is also the one whose words were always good, because his heart was always good. He is the Word who was with God and was God (John 1:1), who became flesh, full of grace and truth (John 1:14). He taught as one having authority (Matthew 7:29), his words are spirit and life (John 6:63), and Peter could say to him, “thou hast the words of eternal life” (John 6:68). In him our hearts are made new, and our speech begins to bear his likeness: truth spoken in love (Ephesians 4:15), speech seasoned with grace (Colossians 4:6), and words spoken as the oracles of God (1 Peter 4:11). The man in verse 22 was given back his sight and his voice, and the same Lord gives his people eyes to see who he is and mouths to praise him.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Matthew 12:22–37. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentMatthew 12:22–37
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In these verses we have,

I.Christ's glorious conquest of Satan, in the gracious cure of one who, by the divine permission, was under his power, and in his possession, Matthew 12:22. Here observe,

1.The man's case was very sad; he was possessed with a devil. More cases of this kind occurred in Christ's time than usual, that Christ's power might be the more magnified, and his purpose the more manifested, in opposing and dispossessing Satan; and that it might the more evidently appear, that he came to destroy the works of the devil. This poor man that was possessed was blind and dumb; a miserable case! he could neither see to help himself, nor speak to others to help him. A soul under Satan's power, and led captive by him, is blind in the things of God, and dumb at the throne of grace; sees nothing, and says nothing to the purpose. Satan blinds the eye of faith, and seals up the lips of prayer.

2.His cure was very strange, and the more so, because sudden; he healed him. Note, The conquering and dispossessing of Satan is the healing of souls. And the cause being removed, immediately the effect ceased; the blind and dumb both spake and saw. Note, Christ's mercy is directly opposite to Satan's malice; his favours, to the devil's mischiefs. When Satan's power is broken in the soul, the eyes are opened to see God's glory, and the lips opened to speak his praise.

II.The conviction which this gave to the people to all the people:

they were amazed. Christ had wrought divers miracles of this kind before; but his works are not the less wonderful, nor the less to be wondered at, for their being often repeated. They inferred from it, "Is not this the Son of David? The Messiah promised, that was to spring from the loins of David? Is not this he that should come?" We may take this, 1. As an enquiring question; they asked, Is not this the Son of David? But they did not stay for an answer: the impressions were cogent, but they were transient. It was a good question that they started; but, it should seem, it was soon lost, and was not prosecuted. Such convictions as these should be brought to a head, and then they are likely to be brought to the heart. Or, 2. as an affirming question; Is not this the Son of David? "Yes, certainly it is, it can be no other; such miracles as these plainly evince that the kingdom of the Messiah is now setting up." And they were the people, the vulgar sort of the spectators, that drew this inference from Christ's miracles. Atheists will say, "That was because they were less prying than the Pharisees;" no, the matter of fact was obvious, and required not much search: but it was because they were less prejudiced and biassed by worldly interest. So plain and easy was the way made to this great truth of Christ being the Messiah and Saviour of the world, that the common people could not miss it; the wayfaring men, though fools, could not err therein. See Isaiah 35:8. It was found of them that sought it. It is an instance of the condescensions of divine grace, that the things that were hid from the wise and prudent were revealed unto babes. The world by wisdom knew not God, and by the foolish things the wise were confounded.

III.The blasphemous cavil of the Pharisees, v.

24. The Pharisees were a sort of men that pretended to more knowledge in, and zeal for, the divine law, than other people; yet they were the most inveterate enemies to Christ and his doctrine. They were proud of the reputation they had among the people; that fed their pride, supported their power, and filled their purses; and when they heard the people say, Is not this the Son of David? they were extremely irritated, more at that than at the miracle itself; this made them jealous of our Lord Jesus, and apprehensive, that as his interest in the people's esteem increased, theirs must of course be eclipsed and diminished; therefore they envied him, as Saul did his father David, because of what the women sang of him, 1 Samuel 18:7, 1 Samuel 18:8. Note, Those who bind up their happiness in the praise and applause of men, expose themselves to a perpetual uneasiness upon every favourable word that they hear said of any other. The shadow of honour followed Christ, who fled from it, and fled from the Pharisees, who were eager in the pursuit of it. They said, "This fellow does not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils, and therefore is not the Son of David." Observe,

1.How scornfully they speak of Christ, this fellow; as if that precious name of his, which is as ointment poured forth, were not worthy to be taken into their lips. It is an instance of their pride and superciliousness, and their diabolical envy, that the more people magnified Christ, the more industrious they were to vilify him. It is a bad thing to speak of good men with disdain because they are poor.

2.How blasphemously they speak of his miracles; they could not deny the matter of fact; it was as plain as the sun, that devils were cast out by the word of Christ; nor could they deny that it was an extraordinary thing, and supernatural. Being thus forced to grant the premises, they had no other way to avoid the conclusion, that this is the Son of David, than by suggesting that Christ cast out devils by Beelzebub; that there was a compact between Christ and the devil; pursuant to that, the devil was not cast out, but did voluntarily retire, and give back by consent and with design: or as if, by an agreement with the ruling devil, he had power to cast out the inferior devils. No surmise could be more palpably false and vile than this; that he, who is Truth itself, should be in combination with the father of lies, to cheat the world. This was the last refuge, or subterfuge rather, or an obstinate infidelity, that was resolved to stand it out against the clearest conviction. Observe, Among the devils there is a prince, the ringleader of the apostasy from God and rebellion against him; but this prince is Beelzebub - the god of a fly, or a dunghill god. How art thou fallen, O Lucifer! from an anger of light, to be a lord of flies! Yet this is the prince of the devils too, the chief of the gang of infernal spirits.

IV.Christ's reply to this base insinuation, Matthew 12:25-30.

Jesus knew their thoughts. Note, Jesus Christ knows what we are thinking at any time, knows what is in man; he understands our thoughts afar off. It should seem that the Pharisees could not for shame speak it out, but kept it in their minds; they could not expect to satisfy the people with it; they therefore reserved it for the silencing of the convictions of their own consciences. Note, Many are kept off from their duty by that which they are ashamed to own, but which they cannot hide from Jesus Christ: yet it is probable that the Pharisees had whispered what they thought among themselves, to help to harden one another; but Christ's reply is said to be to their thoughts, because he knew with what mind, and from what principle, they said it; that they did not say it in their haste, but that it was the product of a rooted malignity.

Christ's reply to this imputation is copious and cogent, that every mouth may be stopped with sense and reason, before it be stopped with fire and brimstone. Here are three arguments by which he demonstrates the unreasonableness of this suggestion.

1.It would be very strange, and highly improbably, that Satan should be cast out by such a compact, because then Satan's kingdom would be divided against itself; which, considering his subtlety, is not a thing to be imagined, Matthew 12:25, Matthew 12:26.

(1.)Here is a known rule laid down, that in all societies a common ruin is the consequence of mutual quarrels: Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every family too: Quae enim domus tam stabilis est, quae tam firma civitas, quae non odiis atque dissidiis funditus everti possit? - For what family is so strong, what community so firm, as not to be overturned by enmity and dissension? Cic. Lael. 7. Divisions commonly end in desolations; if we clash, we break; if we divide one from another, we become an easy prey to a common enemy; much more if we bite and devour one another, shall we be consumed one of another, Galatians 5:15. Churches and nations have known this by sad experience.

(2.)The application of it to the case in hand (Matthew 12:26), If Satan cast out Satan; if the prince of the devils should be at variance with the inferior devils, the whole kingdom and interest would soon be broken; nay, if Satan should come into a compact with Christ, it must be to his own ruin; for the manifest design and tendency of Christ's preaching and miracles was to overthrow the kingdom of Satan, as a kingdom of darkness, wickedness, and enmity to God; and to set up, upon the ruins of it, a kingdom of light, holiness, and love. The works of the devil, as a rebel against God, and a tyrant over the souls of men, were destroyed by Christ; and therefore it was the most absurd thing imaginable, to think that Beelzebub should at all countenance such a design, or come into it: if he should fall in with Christ, how should then his kingdom stand? He would himself contribute to the overthrow of it. Note, The devil has a kingdom, a common interest, in opposition to God and Christ, which, to the utmost of his power, he will make to stand, and he will never come into Christ's interests; he must be conquered and broken by Christ, and therefore cannot submit and bend to him. What concord or communion can there be between light and darkness, Christ and Belial, Christ and Beelzebub? Christ will destroy the devil's kingdom, but he needs not do it by any such little arts and projects as that of a secret compact with Beelzebub; no, this victory must be obtained by nobler methods. Let the prince of the devils muster up all his forces, let him make use of all his powers and politics, and keep his interests in the closest confederacy, yet Christ will be too hard for his united force, and his kingdom shall not stand.

2.It was not at all strange, or improbable, that devils should be cast out by the Spirit of God; for,

(1.)How otherwise do your children cast them out? There were those among the Jews who, by invocation of the name of the most high God, or the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, did sometimes cast out devils. Josephus speaks of some in his time that did it; we read of Jewish exorcists (Acts 19:13), and of some that in Christ's name cast out devils, though they did not follow him (Mark 9:38), or were not faithful to him, Matthew 7:22. These the Pharisees condemned not, but imputed what they did to the Spirit of God, and valued themselves and their nation upon it. It was therefore merely from spite and envy to Christ, that they would own that others cast out devils by the Spirit of God, but suggest that he did it by compact with Beelzebub. Note, It is the way of malicious people, especially the malicious persecutors of Christ and Christianity, to condemn the same thing in those they hate, which they approve of and applaud in those they have a kindness for: the judgments of envy are made, not by things, but persons; not by reason, but prejudice. But those were very unfit to sit in Moses's seat, who knew faces, and knew nothing else in judgment: Therefore they shall be your judges; "This contradicting of yourselves will rise up in judgment against you at the last great day, and will condemn you." Note, In the last judgment, not only every sin, but every aggravation of it, will be brought into the account, and some of our notions that were right and good will be brought in evidence against us, to convict us of partiality.

(2.)This casting out of devils was a certain token and indication of the approach and appearance of the kingdom of God (Matthew 7:28); "But if it be indeed that I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, as certainly I do, then you must conclude, that though you are unwilling to receive it, yet the kingdom of the Messiah is now about to be set up among you." Other miracles that Christ wrought proved him sent of God, but this proved him sent of God to destroy the devil's kingdom and his works. Now that great promise was evidently fulfilled, that the seed of the woman should break the serpent's head, Genesis 3:15. "Therefore that glorious dispensation of the kingdom of God, which has been long expected, is now commenced; slight it at your peril." Note,

[1.]The destruction of the devil's power is wrought by the Spirit of God; that Spirit who works to the obedience of faith, overthrows the interest of that spirit who works in the children of unbelief and disobedience.

[2.]The casting out of devils is a certain introduction to the kingdom of God. If the devil's interest in a soul be not only checked by custom or external restraints, but sunk and broken by the Spirit of God, as a Sanctifier, no doubt but the kingdom of God is come to that soul, the kingdom of grace, a blessed earnest of the kingdom of the glory.

3.The comparing of Christ's miracles, particularly this of casting out devils, with his doctrine, and the design and tendency of his holy religion, evidenced that he was so far from being in league with Satan, that he was at open enmity and hostility against him (Matthew 12:29); How can one enter into a strong man's house, and plunder his goods, and carry them away, except he first bind the strong man? And then he may do what he pleases with his goods. The world, that sat in darkness, and lay in wickedness, was in Satan's possession, and under his power, as a house in the possession and under the power of a strong man; so is every unregenerate soul; there Satan resides, there he rules. Now,

(1.)The design of Christ's gospel was to spoil the devil's house, which, as a strong man, he kept in the world; to turn the people from darkness to light, from sin to holiness, from this world to a better, from the power of Satan unto God (Acts 26:18); to alter the property of souls.

(2.)Pursuant to this design, he bound the strong man, when he cast out unclean spirits by his word: thus he wrested the sword out of the devil's hand, that he might wrest the sceptre out of it. The doctrine of Christ teaches us how to construe his miracles, and when he showed how easily and effectually he could cast the devil out of people's bodies, he encouraged all believers to hope that, whatever power Satan might usurp and exercise in the souls of men, Christ by his grace would break it: he will spoil him, for it appears that he can bind him. When nations were turned from the service of idols to serve the living God, when some of the worst of sinners were sanctified and justified, and became the best of saints, then Christ spoiled the devil's house, and will spoil it more and more.

4.It is here intimated, that this holy war, which Christ was carrying on with vigour against the devil and his kingdom, was such as would not admit of a neutrality (Matthew 12:30), He that is not with me is against me. In the little differences that may arise between the disciples of Christ among themselves, we are taught to lessen the matters in variance, and to seek peace, by accounting those who are not against us, to be with us (Luke 9:50); but in the great quarrel between Christ and the devil, no peace is to be sought, nor any such favourable construction to be made of any indifference in the matter; he that is not hearty for Christ, will be reckoned with as really against him: he that is cold in the cause, is looked upon as an enemy. When the dispute is between God and Baal, there is no halting between two (1 Kings 18:21), there is no trimming between Christ and Belial; for the kingdom of Christ, as it is eternally opposite to, so it will be eternally victorious over, the devil's kingdom; and therefore in this cause there is no sitting still with Gilead beyond Jordan, or Asher on the sea-shore, (Judges 4:16, Judges 4:17), we must be entirely, faithfully, and immovably, on Christ's side; it is the right side, and will at last be the rising side. See Exodus 32:26.

The latter clause is to the same purport: He that gathereth not with me scattereth. Note, (1.) Christ's errand into the world was to gather, to gather in his harvest, to gather in those whom the Father had given him, John 11:52; Ephesians 1:10. (2.) Christ expects and requires from those who are with him, that they gather with him; that they not only gather to him themselves, but do all they can in their places to gather others to him, and so to strengthen his interest. (3.) Those who will not appear, and act, as furtherers of Christ's kingdom, will be looked upon, and dealt with, as hinderers of it; if we gather not with Christ, we scatter; it is not enough, not to do hurt, but we must do good. Thus is the breach widened between Christ and Satan, to show that there was no such compact between them as the Pharisees whispered.

V.Here is a discourse of Christ's upon this occasion, concerning tongue-sins; Wherefore I say unto you.

He seems to turn from the Pharisees to the people, from disputing to instructing; and from the sin of the Pharisees he warns the people concerning three sorts of tongue-sins; for others' harms are admonitions to us.

1.Blasphemous words against the Holy Ghost are the worst kind of tongue-sins, and unpardonable, Matthew 12:31, Matthew 12:32.

(1.)Here is a gracious assurance of the pardon of all sin upon gospel terms: this Christ says to us, and it is a comfortable saying, that the greatness of sin shall be no bar to our acceptance with God, if we truly repent and believe the gospel: All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men. Though the sin has been as scarlet and crimson (Isaiah 1:18), though ever so heinous in its nature, ever so much aggravated by its circumstances, and ever so often repeated, though it reach up to the heavens, yet with the Lord there is mercy, that reacheth beyond the heavens; mercy will be extended even to blasphemy, a sin immediately touching God's name and honour. Paul obtained mercy, who had been a blasphemer, 1 Timothy 1:13. Well may we say, Who is a God like unto thee, pardoning iniquity? Micah 7:18. Even words spoken against the Son of man shall be forgiven; as theirs were who reviled him at his death, many of whom repented and found mercy. Christ herein has set an example to all the sons of men, to be ready to forgive words spoken against them: I, as a deaf man, heard not. Observe, They shall be forgiven unto men, not to devils; this is love to the whole world of mankind, above the world of fallen angels, that all sin is pardonable to them.

(2.)Here is an exception of the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, which is here declared to be the only unpardonable sin. See here,

[1.]What this sin; it is speaking against the Holy Ghost. See what malignity there is in tongue-sins, when the only unpardonable sin is so. But Jesus knew their thoughts, Matthew 12:25. It is not all speaking against the person or essence of the Holy Ghost, or some of his more private operations, or merely the resisting of his internal working in the sinner himself, that is here meant; for who then should be saved? It is adjudged in our law, that an act of indemnity shall always be construed in favour of that grace and clemency which is the intention of the act; and therefore the exceptions in the act are not to be extended further than needs must. The gospel is an act of indemnity; none are excepted by name, nor any by description, but those only that blaspheme the Holy Ghost; which therefore must be construed in the narrowest sense: all presuming sinners are effectually cut off by the conditions of the indemnity, faith and repentance; and therefore the other exceptions must not be stretched far: and this blasphemy is excepted, not for any defect of mercy in God or merit in Christ, but because it inevitably leaves the sinner in infidelity and impenitency. We have reason to think that none are guilty of this sin, who believe that Christ is the Son of God, and sincerely desire to have part in his merit and mercy: and those who fear they have committed this sin, give a good sign that they have not. The learned Dr. Whitby very well observes, that Christ speaks not of what should be (Mark 3:28; Luke 12:10); Whosoever shall blaspheme. As for those who blasphemed Christ when he was here upon earth, and called him a Winebibber, a Deceiver, a Blasphemer, and the like, they had some colour of excuse, because of the meanness of his appearance, and the prejudices of the nation against him; and the proof of his divine mission was not perfected till after his ascension; and therefore, upon their repentance, they shall be pardoned: and it is hoped that they may be convinced by the pouring out of the Spirit, as many of them were, who had been his betrayers and murderers. But if, when the Holy Ghost is given, in his inward gifts of revelation, speaking with tongues, and the like, such as were the distributions of the Spirit among the apostles, if they continue to blaspheme the Spirit likewise, as an evil spirit, there is no hope of them that they will ever be brought to believe in Christ; for First, Those gifts of the Holy Ghost in the apostles were the last proof that God designed to make use of for the confirming of the gospel, and were still kept in reserve, when other methods preceded. Secondly, This was the most powerful evidence, and more apt to convince than miracles themselves. Thirdly, Those therefore who blaspheme this dispensation of the Spirit, cannot possibly be brought to believe in Christ; those who shall impute them to a collusion with Satan, as the Pharisees did the miracles, what can convince them? This is such a strong hold of infidelity as a man can never be beaten out of, and is therefore unpardonable, because hereby repentance is hid from the sinner's eyes.

[2.]What the sentence is that is passed upon it; It shall not be forgiven, neither in this world, nor in the world to come. As in the then present state of the Jewish church, there was no sacrifice of expiation for the soul that sinned presumptuously; so neither under the dispensation of gospel grace, which is often in scripture called the world to come, shall there be any pardon to such as tread underfoot the blood of the covenant, and do despite to the Spirit of grace: there is no cure for a sin so directly against the remedy. It was a rule in our old law, No sanctuary for sacrilege. Or, It shall be forgiven neither now, in the sinner's own conscience, nor in the great day, when the pardon shall be published. Or, this is a sin that exposes the sinner both to temporal and eternal punishment, both to present wrath and the wrath to come.

2.Christ speaks here concerning other wicked words, the products of corruption reigning in the heart, and breaking out thence, Matthew 12:33-35. It was said (Matthew 12:25) that Jesus knew their thoughts, and here he spoke with an eye to them, showing that it was not strange that they should speak so ill, when their hearts were so full of enmity and malice; which yet they often endeavoured to cloak and cover, by feigning themselves just men. Our Lord Jesus therefore points to the springs and heals them; let the heart be sanctified and it will appear in our words.

(1.)The heart is the root, the language is the fruit (Matthew 12:33); if the nature of the tree be good, it will bring forth fruit accordingly. Where grace is the reigning principle in the heart, the language will be the language of Canaan; and, on the contrary, whatever lust reigns in the heart it will break out; diseased lungs make an offensive breath: men's language discovers what country they are of, so likewise what manner of spirit they are of: "Either make the tree good, and then the fruit will be good; get pure hearts and then you will have pure lips and pure lives; or else the tree will be corrupt, and the fruit accordingly. you may make a crab-stock to become a good tree, by grafting into it a shoot from a good tree, and then the fruit will be good; but if the tree be still the same, plant it where you will, and water it how you will, the fruit will be still corrupt." Note, Unless the heart be transformed, the life will never be thoroughly reformed. These Pharisees were shy of speaking out their wicked thoughts of Jesus Christ; but Christ here intimates, how vain it was for them to seek to hide that root of bitterness in them, that bore this gall and wormwood, when they never sought to mortify it. Note, It should be more our care to be good really, than to seem good outwardly.

(2.)The heart is the fountain, the words are the streams (Matthew 12:34); Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks, as the streams are the overflowings of the spring. A wicked heart is said to send forth wickedness, as a fountain casts forth her waters, Jeremiah 6:7. A troubled fountain, and a corrupt spring, such as Solomon speaks of (Proverbs 25:26), must needs send forth muddy and unpleasant streams. Evil words are the natural, genuine product of an evil heart. Nothing but the salt of grace, cast into the spring, will heal the waters, season the speech, and purify the corrupt communications. This they wanted, they were evil; and how can ye, being evil, speak good things? They were a generation of vipers; John Baptist had called them so (Matthew 3:7), and they were still the same; for can the Ethiopian change his skin? The people looked upon the Pharisees as a generation of saints, but Christ calls them a generation of vipers, the seed of the serpent, that had an enmity to Christ and his gospel. Now what could be expected from a generation of vipers, but that which is poisonous and malignant? Can the viper be otherwise than venomous? Note, Bad things may be expected from bad people, as said the proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth from the wicked, 1 Samuel 24:13. The vile person will speak villany, Isaiah 32:6. Those who are themselves evil, have neither skill nor will to speak good things, as they should be spoken. Christ would have his disciples know what sort of men they were to live among, that they might know what to look for. They are as Ezekiel among scorpions (Ezekiel 2:6), and must not think it strange if they be stung and bitten.

(3.)The heart is the treasury, the words are the things brought out of that treasury (Matthew 12:35); and from hence men's characters may be drawn, and may be judged of.

[1.]It is the character of a good man, that he has a good treasure in his heart, and from thence brings forth good things, as there is occasion. Graces, comforts, experiences, good knowledge, good affections, good resolutions, these are a good treasure in the heart; the word of God hidden there, the law of God written there, divine truths dwelling and ruling thee, are a treasure there, valuable and suitable, kept safe and kept secret, as the stores of the good householder, but ready for use upon all occasions. A good man, thus furnished, will bring forth, as Joseph out of his stores; will be speaking and doing that which is good, for God's glory, and the edification of others. See Proverbs 10:11, Proverbs 10:13, Proverbs 10:14, Proverbs 10:20, Proverbs 10:21, Proverbs 10:31, Proverbs 10:32. This is bringing forth good things. Some pretend to good expenses that have not a good treasure - such will soon be bankrupts: some pretend to have a good treasure within, but give no proof of it: they hope they have it in them, and thank God, whatever their words and actions are, they have good hearts; but faith without works is dead: and some have a good treasure of wisdom and knowledge, but they are not communicative, they do not bring forth out of it: they have a talent, but know not how to trade with it. The complete Christian in this bears the image of God, that he both is good, and does good.

[2.]It is the character of an evil man, that he has an evil treasure in his heart, and out of it bringeth forth evil things. Lusts and corruptions dwelling and reigning in the heart are an evil treasure, out of which the sinner brings forth bad words and actions, to the dishonour of God, and the hurt of others. See Genesis 6:5, Genesis 6:12; Matthew 15:18-20; James 1:15. But treasures of wickedness (Proverbs 10:2) will be treasures of wrath.

3.Christ speaks here concerning idle words, and shows what evil there is in them (Matthew 12:36, Matthew 12:37); much more is there in such wicked words as the Pharisees spoke. It concerns us to think much of the day of judgment, that that may be a check upon our tongues; and let us consider,

(1.)How particular the account will be of tongue-sins in that day: even for every idle words, or discourse, that men speak, they shall give account. This intimates,

[1.]That God takes notice of every word we say, even that which we ourselves do not notice. See Psalm 139:4. Not a word in my tongue but thou knowest it: though spoken without regard or design, God takes cognizance of it.

[2.]That vain, idle, impertinent talk is displeasing to God, which tends not to any good purpose, is not good to any use of edifying; it is the product of a vain and trifling heart. These idle words are the same with that foolish talking and jesting which is forbidden, Ephesians 5:4. This is that sin which is seldom wanting in the multitude of words, unprofitable talk, Job 15:3.

[3.]We must shortly account for these idle words; they will be produced in evidence against us, to prove us unprofitable servants, that have not improved the faculties of reason and speech, which are part of the talents we are entrusted with. If we repent not of our idle words, and our account for them be not balanced by the blood of Christ, we are undone.

(2.)How strict the judgment will be upon that account (Matthew 12:37); By thy words thou shall be justified or condemned; a common rule in men's judgments, and here applied to God's. Note, The constant tenour of our discourse, according as it is gracious or not gracious, will be an evidence for us, or against us, at the great day. Those who seemed to be religious, but bridled not their tongue, will then be found to have put a cheat upon themselves with a vain religion, James 1:26. Some think that Christ here refers to that of Eliphaz (Job 15:6), Thine own mouth condemneth thee, and not I; or, rather, to that of Solomon (Proverbs 18:21), Death and life are in the power of the tongue.

Historical interpretation

Eight Centuries of Reception

9 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

9 quotes · AD 367–1150
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
40050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 367Hilary of Poitiersas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
For a city or family is analogous to a kingdom, as it follows, And every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.

But the word of God is rich, and whether taken simply, or examined inwardly, it is needful for our advancement. Leaving therefore what belongs to the plain understanding thereof, let us dwell on some of the more secret reasons. The Lord is about to make answer to that which they had said concerning Beelzebub, and He casts upon those to whom He made answer a condition of their answering. Thus; The Law was from God and the promise of the kingdom to Israel was by the Law, but if the kingdom of the Law be divided in itself, it must needs be destroyed; and thus Israel lost the Law, when the nation whose was the Law, rejected the fulfilment of the Law in Christ. The city here spoken of is Jerusalem, which when it raged with the madness of its people against the Lord, and drove out His Apostles with the multitude of them that believed, after this division shall not stand; and thus (which soon happened in consequence of this division) the destruction of that city is declared. Again He puts another case, And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how then shall his kingdom stand?

Otherwise; If the dæmon was driven to this division to the end that he should thus afflict the dæmons, even thus must we attribute higher power to Him who made the division than to those who are thus divided; thus the kingdom of the Devil, after this division made, is destroyed by Christ.
The law comes from God. The promise of the kingdom of Israel comes from the law, and the announcement of Christ’s birth and arrival come from the law. If the kingdom of the law is divided against itself, it will of necessity be abandoned. Every power is pulled down by division, and the strength of a kingdom separated from itself is destroyed. Thus the kingdom of Israel has fallen from the law when the people of the law oppose the fulfillment of the law in Christ. “But both a city and a house divided against themselves will not stand.” The dwelling of a city is the same principle as that of a kingdom. But this city of Jerusalem is always viewed in contrast to the boastful tyranny of the nations. Now after Jerusalem had been inflamed against the Lord by the madness of its people and after the crowd of the faithful had put his apostles to flight, then it will not stand because of the division of those who are leaving. And so, what directly follows this division is the order for that city’s destruction.
d. AD 406Chromatius of AquileiaPost-NiceneSourceTRACTATE ON MATTHEW 49.5
The Lord declared that a kingdom or city or house divided against itself could not stand. This was said in reference to the kingdom that the Jews themselves occupied under the rule of Jeroboam, the servant of Solomon, which was judged as abandoned before being divided. The Jews would lose entirely the city of Jerusalem, to which Samaria had been hostile. They would lose the dwelling place of God’s temple against which golden calves and the house of idols had been erected. He showed them that they ought rather to follow that kingdom that cannot be divided—that is, the heavenly and eternal one. The spiritual city of Jerusalem always remains fixed and immovable. No hostile power ever has been or will be able to overcome the true house of God. That house which is protected by the Son of God is quite safe.
d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. xli.) Above they had accused Christ of having cast out dæmons by Beelzebub; but then He did not reprove them, suffering them, if they would, to acknowledge Him from further miracles, and to learn His greatness from His doctrine. But because they continued to maintain the same things, He now rebukes them, although their accusation had been very unreasonable. But jealousy recks not what it says, so that only it say somewhat. Yet does not Christ contemn them, but answers with a gracious mildness, teaching us to be gentle to our enemies, and not to be troubled, even though they should speak such things against us, as we neither acknowledge in us, nor have any reasonableness in themselves. Therein also He proves that the things which they had said against Him were false, for it is not of one having a dæmon to show such mercy, and to know the thoughts. Moreover, because this their accusation was very unreasonable, and they feared the multitude, they did not dare to proclaim it openly, but kept it in their thoughts; wherefore he says, Knowing their thoughts. He does not repeat their thoughts in His answer, not to divulge their wickedness; but He brings forward an answer; it was His object to do good to the sinners, not to proclaim their sin. He does not answer them out of the Scriptures, because they would not hearken to Him as they explained them differently, but He refutes them from common opinions. For assaults from without are not so destructive as quarrels within; and this is so in bodies and in all other things. But in the mean while He draws instances from matters more known, saying, Every kingdom divided against itself shall be brought to desolation; for there is nothing on earth more powerful than a kingdom, and yet that is destroyed by contention. What then must we say concerning a city or a family, that whether it be great or small, it is destroyed when it is at discord within itself.

Or thus; If he is divided, he is made weak, and perishes; but if he perishes, how can he cast out another?
Even before now they had accused Him of this, that "by Beelzebub He casteth out the devils." But whereas then He did not rebuke them, allowing them both to know His power by His more numerous miracles, and by His teaching to learn His majesty: now, since they continued saying the same, He proceeds also to rebuke them, showing His Godhead by this first, that He made their secrets public; and secondly, by the very act of casting out the devils with ease.

And indeed the accusation too was very shameless. Because, as I have said, envy seeks not what to say, but only that it may say somewhat. Yet for all that, not even so did Christ despise them, but defends Himself with the forbearance proper to Him, teaching us to be meek to our enemies; and though they say such things, as we are neither conscious of, nor have they any the least probability, not to be disturbed, nor troubled, but with all long suffering to render them an account. This then He did most especially on that very occasion, affording the strongest proof, that the things were false that were said by them. For neither was it a demoniac's part to exhibit so much meekness; it was not a demoniac's part to know men's secrets.

For, in truth, both because of the exceeding impudence of such a suspicion, and because of the fear of the multitude, they durst not publicly make these charges, but were turning them in their mind. But He, to show them that He knew all that likewise, doth not set down the accusation, nor doth He expose their wickedness; but the refutation He adds, leaving it to the conscience of them that bad said it to convict them. For on one thing only was He bent, to do good to them that were sinning, not to expose them.

Yet surely, if He had been minded to extend his speech in length, and to make them ridiculous, and withal to have exacted of them also the most extreme penalty, there was nothing to hinder Him. Nevertheless He put aside all these things, and looked to one object only, not to render them more contentious, but more candid, and so to dispose them better toward amendment.

How then doth He plead with them? Not by allegation out of the Scriptures (for they would not so much as attend, but were sure rather to distort their meaning), but by the events of ordinary life. For "every kingdom," saith He, "divided against itself shall not stand; and a city and a house, if it be divided, is soon dissolved."

For the wars from without are not so ruinous as the civil ones. Yea, and this is the case in bodies too; it is the case even in all things; but for this time He takes His illustration from those that are more publicly known.

And yet, what is there more powerful on earth than a kingdom? Nothing, but nevertheless it perishes if in dissension. And if in that case one throw the blame on the great burden of the affairs thereof, as breaking down by its own weight; what wouldest thou say of a city? and what of a house? Thus, Whether it be a small thing, or a great, if at dissension with itself, it perishes. If then I, having a devil, do by him cast out the devils, there is dissension and fighting among devils, and they take their stand one against another. But if they stand one against another, their strength is wasted and destroyed. "For if Satan cast out Satan" (and He said not "the devils," implying their great unanimity one with another), "he is then divided against himself;" so He speaks. But if he be divided, he is become weaker, and is ruined; and if he be ruined, how can he cast out another?

Seest thou how great the absurdity of the accusation, how great the folly, the inconsistency? Since it is not for the same persons to say first, that He stands, and casts out devils, and then to say, that He stands by that, which it was likely would be the cause of His undoing.
d. AD 420Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
The Pharisees ascribed the works of God to the Prince of the dæmons; and the Lord makes answer not to what they said, but to what they thought, that even thus they might be compelled to believe His power, Who saw the secrets of the heart; Jesus, knowing their thoughts, said unto them.

For as small things grow by concord, so the greatest fall to pieces through dissensions.

As much as to say, If Satan fight against himself, and dæmon be an enemy to dæmon, then must the end of the world be at hand, that these hostile powers should have no place there, whose mutual war is peace for men.

But if ye think, ye Scribes and Pharisees, that the dæmons depart out of the possessed in obedience to their Prince, that men may be imposed upon by a concerted fraud, what can ye say to the healing of diseases which the Lord also wrought? It is something more if ye assign to the dæmons even bodily infirmities, and the signs of spiritual virtues.
d. AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Matthew
(Verse 25) But Jesus, knowing their thoughts, said to them: Every kingdom divided against itself shall be made desolate, and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand. The crowds marveled and confessed that he, who performed such great signs, was the son of David. But the Pharisees attributed the works of God to the prince of demons. To them, the Lord did not respond to their words, but to their thoughts, so that they might be compelled to believe in his power, who saw the hidden things of the heart.
d. AD 533Remigius of Rheimsas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Beelzebub is the same as Beel or Baal, or Beelphegor. Beel was father of Ninus king of Assyria; Baal was so called because he was worshipped on high; he was called Beelphegor from the mountain Phegor; Zebub was the servant of Abimelech the son of Gedeon, who, having slain his seventy brothers, built a temple to Baal, and set him up as Priest therein, to drive away the flies which were collected there by the abundant blood of the victims; for Zebub means, a fly. Beelzebub therefore is interpreted, The man of flies, wherefore from this most unclean worship they called him the Prince of the dæmons. Having therefore nothing more mean to cast upon the Lord, they said that He cast out dæmons by Beelzebub. And it should be known that this word is not to be read with d or t at the end, as some corrupt copies have, but with b.
AD 1150Glossa Ordinariaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(ord.) He holds them therefore in this dilemma. For Christ casts out dæmons either by the power of God, or by the Prince of the dæmons. If by the power of God, their accusations are malicious; if by the Prince of the dæmons, his kingdom is divided, and will not stand, and therefore let them depart out of his kingdom. And this alternative He intimates that they had chosen for themselves, when they refused to believe in Him.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Matthew 12:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8