TRV
- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 13:11–22. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
The man of God had honestly and resolutely refused the king's invitation, though he promised him a reward; yet he was over-persuaded by an old prophet to come back with him, and dine in Beth-el, contrary to the command given him. Here we find how dearly his dinner cost him. Observe with wonder,
I.The old prophet's wickedness.
I cannot but call him a false prophet and a bad man, it being much easier to believe that from one of such a bad character should be extorted a confirmation of what the man of God said (as we find, Kg1 13:32) than that a true prophet, and a good man, should tell such a deliberate lie as he did, and father it upon God. A good tree could never bring forth such corrupt fruit. Perhaps he was trained up among the sons of the prophets, in one of Samuel's colleges not far off, whence he retained the name of a prophet, but, growing worldly and profane, the spirit of prophecy had departed from him. If he had been a good prophet he would have reproved Jeroboam's idolatry, and not have suffered his sons to attend his altars, as, it should seem, they did. Now,
1.Whether he had any good design in fetching back the man of God is not certain. One may hope that he did it in compassion to him, concluding he wanted refreshment, and out of a desire to be better acquainted with him and more fully to understand his errand than he could from the report of his sons; yet his sons having told him all that passed, and particularly that the prophet was forbidden to eat or drink there, which he had openly told Jeroboam, I suppose it was done with a bad design, to draw him into a snare, and so to expose him; for false prophets have ever been the worst enemies to the true prophets, usually aiming to destroy them, but sometimes, as here, to debauch them and draw them from their duty. Thus they gave the Nazarites wine to drink (Amo 2:12), that they might glory in their fall. But,
2.It is certain that he took a very bad method to bring him back. When the man of God had told him, "I may not, and therefore I will not, return to eat bread with thee" (his resolutions concurring with the divine command, Kg1 13:16, Kg1 13:17), he wickedly pretended that he had an order from heaven to fetch him back. He imposed upon him by asserting his quondam character as a prophet: I am a prophet also as thou art; he pretended he had a vision of an angel that sent him on this errand. But it was all a lie; it was a banter upon prophecy, and profane in the highest degree. When this old prophet is spoken of (Kg2 23:18) he is called the prophet that came out of Samaria, whereas there was no such place as Samaria till long after, Kg1 16:24. Therefore I take it he is so called there, though he was of Beth-el, because he was like those who were afterwards the prophets of Samaria, who caused God's people Israel to err, Jer 23:13.
II.The good prophet's weakness, in suffering himself to be thus imposed upon:
He went back with him, Kg1 13:19. He that had resolution enough to refuse the invitation of the king, who promised him a reward, could not resist the insinuations of one that pretended to be a prophet. God's people are more in danger of being drawn from their duty by the plausible pretences of divinity and sanctity than by external inducements; we have therefore need to beware of false prophets, and not believe every spirit.
III.The proceedings of divine justice hereupon; and here we may well wonder that the wicked prophet, who told the lie and did the mischief, went unpunished, while the holy man of God, that was drawn by him into sin, was suddenly and severely punished for it. What shall we make of this! The judgments of God are unfathomable. The deceived and the deceiver are his, and he giveth not account of any of his matters. Certainly there must be a judgment to come, when these things will be called over again, and when those that sinned most and suffered least, in this world, will receive according to their works. 1. The message delivered to the man of God was strange. His crime is recited, Kg1 13:21, Kg1 13:22. It was, in one word, disobedience to an express command. Judgment is given upon it: Thy carcase shall not come to the sepulchre of thy fathers, that is, "Thou shalt never reach thy own house, but shalt be a carcase quickly, nor shall thy dead body be brought to the place of thy fathers' sepulchres, to be interred." 2. Yet it was more strange that the old prophet himself should be the messenger. Of this we can give no account but that God would have it so, as he spoke to Balaam by his ass and read Saul his doom by the devil in Samuel's likeness. We may think God designed hereby, (1.) To startle the lying prophet, and make him sensible of his sin. The message could not but affect him the more when he himself had the delivering of it, and had so strong an impression made upon his spirit by it that he cried out, as one in an agony, Kg1 13:21. He had reason to think, if he must die for his disobedience in a small matter who sinned by surprise, of how much sorer punishment he should be thought worthy who had belied an angel of God and cheated a man of God by a deliberate forgery. If this were done to the green tree, what shall be done to the dry? Perhaps it had a good effect upon him. Those who preach God's wrath to others have hard hearts indeed if they fear it not themselves. (2.) To put the greater mortification upon the prophet that was deceived, and to show what those must expect who hearken to the great deceiver. Those that yield to him as a tempter will be terrified by him as a tormentor; whom he now fawns upon he will afterwards fly upon, and whom he now draws into sin he will do what he can to drive to despair.
Continue studying 1 Kings 13:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Kings 13:17 records the steadfast declaration of the man of God from Judah, reiterating the precise and non-negotiable divine instructions received directly from the LORD. This verse is central to the narrative, immediately following his powerful prophetic pronouncement against King Jeroboam's idolatrous altar at Bethel and his miraculous preservation from Jeroboam's attempt to seize him. It profoundly underscores the prophet's initial unwavering obedience to God's specific commands regarding his conduct during and after his mission, setting the poignant stage for the tragic consequences that would ensue from his later deviation from these very instructions.
Context
Literary Context
The narrative of 1 Kings 13 opens with an unnamed man of God arriving from Judah at Bethel. His mission is to confront King Jeroboam, who had established rival worship centers with golden calves at Dan and Bethel to prevent his people from returning to Jerusalem for legitimate Yahweh worship (1 Kings 12:28-30). The prophet delivers a stern prophecy against the altar and Jeroboam himself (1 Kings 13:1-2). When Jeroboam attempts to seize him, his hand withers, and the altar splits, validating the divine message (1 Kings 13:4-5). In gratitude, Jeroboam invites the man of God to dine with him and receive a reward. Verse 17, along with the earlier 1 Kings 13:8-9, records the man of God's firm refusal, explicitly citing the divine command to abstain from food and drink in Bethel and to return by a different route. This refusal highlights his initial fidelity to God's word, making his subsequent disobedience, detailed in the latter part of the chapter, all the more tragic and impactful.
Historical & Cultural Context
This event unfolds during the tumultuous early years of the divided monarchy, shortly after the schism between the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah. Jeroboam's establishment of cultic sites at Dan and Bethel was a calculated political and religious maneuver designed to consolidate his power and prevent his subjects from maintaining religious ties with Jerusalem, the capital of Judah and the legitimate center of Yahweh worship. Bethel, historically significant as a place where Jacob encountered God (Genesis 28:10-22), was now a site of egregious idolatry. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, hospitality was a sacred duty, and refusing an invitation from a king, especially after performing a miraculous act, could be seen as a grave insult or an act of defiance. The man of God's strict adherence to God's command to refuse sustenance and a direct return route was thus a powerful symbolic act, signifying his complete separation from the corrupt environment and his uncompromised allegiance to the LORD, even at the cost of offending a king or foregoing customary hospitality.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several key themes within 1 Kings 13 and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the absolute authority of God's word and the imperative of strict obedience to divine commands. The man of God's clear reiteration of "the word of the LORD" emphasizes that God's instructions are not mere suggestions but non-negotiable mandates that carry inherent power and demand unreserved compliance. Secondly, the divine prohibition serves as a profound test of obedience and faithfulness. The restrictions on eating, drinking, and the return route were specifically designed to ensure the prophet's complete reliance on God and to prevent any defilement or compromise from the idolatrous environment. This test highlights the spiritual discipline and unwavering commitment required of those who serve God. Tragically, this verse also serves as a stark foreshadowing of the consequences of disobedience. The man of God's firm declaration here makes his later fall, when he is deceived by an old prophet into violating these very commands (1 Kings 13:18-19), a profound illustration of the gravity of disregarding God's explicit word, even if done under duress or deception, leading to severe and fatal outcomes (1 Kings 13:24).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
The phrase "by the word of the LORD" translates the Hebrew "בִּדְבַר יְהוָה" (bidvar YHWH). The word "דָּבָר" (H1697, dâbâr) is far more than a mere utterance; it signifies a powerful, active, and authoritative decree or message from God. It implies a divine mandate that carries inherent power and demands absolute compliance. This emphasizes that the man of God's instructions were not arbitrary but originated from the sovereign will of Yahweh himself, carrying the weight of a binding command.
The divine name "LORD" translates the Hebrew "יְהוָה" (H3068, Yᵉhôvâh), which is the covenant name of God, often rendered as Yahweh. This name emphasizes God's self-existence, eternal nature, and His covenant faithfulness to His people. By explicitly stating that the command came "by the word of the LORD," the man of God underscores the ultimate source of his authority and the non-negotiable nature of the command, linking it directly to the unchanging, sovereign God of Israel.
The word "way" translates the Hebrew "דֶּרֶךְ" (H1870, derek), which literally means a road or path. Figuratively, it can refer to a course of life or a mode of action. In this context, the command "nor turn again to go by the way that thou camest" emphasizes a complete and decisive break from the condemned environment. It signifies not just a physical route, but also a spiritual separation, ensuring no lingering association or return to the corrupt influences of Bethel.
Verse Breakdown
"For it was said to me by the word of the LORD,"
This opening clause establishes the divine origin and unassailable authority of the instructions. The man of God is not acting on his own initiative or personal preference but is merely relaying a direct, explicit command from Yahweh. This phrase serves as a powerful justification for his refusal of Jeroboam's hospitality, placing the divine will above human custom or royal invitation. It highlights the prophet's role as a faithful messenger, bound by the authority of his sender.
"Thou shalt eat no bread nor drink water there,"
This is the first specific prohibition. The "there" refers to Bethel, the location of Jeroboam's idolatrous altar and the center of his apostate worship. This command signifies a complete and absolute separation from the defiled environment. To partake of food or drink would imply fellowship, acceptance, or even dependence on a place that God had condemned. It was a symbolic act of purity and non-association with apostasy, emphasizing the prophet's sole reliance on God for sustenance and protection, and his refusal to be compromised by the unholy.
"nor turn again to go by the way that thou camest."
This is the second specific prohibition, concerning the return journey. This command reinforces the idea of complete separation and non-association with the idolatrous kingdom. Returning by the same path might symbolize a lingering connection to the condemned place or a return to the "old ways." It ensured a clean break, preventing any further contact or compromise with the idolatrous kingdom of Israel and emphasizing the uniqueness and finality of his divine mission to Bethel, marked by a decisive departure.
Literary Devices
The passage in 1 Kings 13:17, within its broader narrative, makes effective use of several literary devices. Foreshadowing is prominently employed, as the man of God's firm reiteration of the divine command tragically anticipates his later failure to uphold it, leading to his demise. This initial display of unwavering obedience sets up a poignant contrast with his eventual disobedience, heightening the dramatic tension and emphasizing the gravity of his fall. Symbolism is also powerfully at play through the specific prohibitions: the refusal of food and drink symbolizes a complete disassociation from the corrupt environment of Bethel and a reliance solely on divine provision, while the command to return by a different route symbolizes a clean break from the condemned territory and its spiritual contamination. Finally, there is a profound Irony in the narrative. The man of God, who so confidently declared "the word of the LORD" and initially obeyed it perfectly, ultimately falls because he accepts a different "word of the LORD" from an old prophet, which turns out to be a lie. This tragic irony underscores the dangers of deception and the critical importance of discerning true divine revelation.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Kings 13:17 serves as a powerful reminder of the absolute authority of God's word and the non-negotiable demand for obedience from His servants. The man of God's initial fidelity highlights that divine commands are not arbitrary but are given for specific purposes—to maintain purity, prevent compromise, and demonstrate complete reliance on God. His subsequent failure underscores the fragility of human obedience and the severe consequences of even seemingly minor deviations from God's explicit instructions, especially when influenced by deceptive counsel. The narrative warns against both overt rebellion and subtle forms of compromise, emphasizing that God's word, once clearly given, must be honored above all human persuasion or perceived convenience. It challenges believers to cultivate a deep reverence for Scripture and to remain vigilant against any voice, however seemingly spiritual, that contradicts divine truth.
Reflection and Application
The account surrounding 1 Kings 13:17 profoundly challenges believers to examine the nature of their obedience to God's revealed will. The man of God's initial steadfastness, contrasted with his later tragic fall, serves as a potent warning: even those who have experienced powerful divine encounters and delivered God's word can be vulnerable to deception and disobedience. This narrative calls us to cultivate an unwavering commitment to God's explicit commands, as found in Scripture, and to be acutely discerning of voices—even those claiming spiritual authority—that might subtly undermine or contradict what God has plainly spoken. Our spiritual walk is not merely about grand prophetic acts but about consistent, moment-by-moment fidelity to the clear instructions of our Lord. The story compels us to ask: Are we truly listening to God's word, or are we susceptible to persuasive arguments that cater to our desires for comfort, acceptance, or intellectual curiosity, even if they lead us astray from the path of strict obedience?
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why were the restrictions on eating, drinking, and the return route so strict?
The restrictions were not arbitrary but served multiple crucial purposes. Firstly, they were a symbolic act of separation from the idolatrous and condemned environment of Bethel. To eat or drink there would imply fellowship or acceptance of a place and a king actively defying God. Secondly, they were a test of obedience and reliance on God alone. By forbidding human sustenance and a familiar return path, God was ensuring the prophet's complete dependence on divine provision and guidance. Thirdly, they served as a prophetic sign in themselves, emphasizing the gravity of Jeroboam's sin and the complete break God desired from such apostasy. The man of God was to be a pure vessel, uncontaminated by the very place he was sent to condemn, reinforcing the message of divine judgment against the corrupt worship established by Jeroboam (1 Kings 12:28-30).
Was the old prophet truly a prophet of the LORD, and why did he lie?
The text identifies him as an "old prophet" (1 Kings 13:11). While he clearly had a history of prophetic activity, his actions in this chapter demonstrate a severe moral and spiritual compromise. He was a prophet living in Bethel, a center of idolatry, and his motivation for lying is debated among scholars. Some suggest he might have been testing the man of God, or perhaps he was jealous of the younger prophet's direct commission, or even seeking to re-establish his own prophetic credibility. Regardless of his exact motive, his deception was a grave sin, directly contradicting God's clear command and leading to the death of the man of God. His actions serve as a stark warning that not all who claim to speak for God are trustworthy, and that even genuine prophets can fall into error or deception, highlighting the critical need to test all spirits and words against God's revealed truth (1 John 4:1).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The tragic narrative of the man of God from Judah, particularly his initial unwavering obedience in 1 Kings 13:17 and his subsequent fatal deviation, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Where the man of God ultimately failed in his obedience to a specific divine command, Jesus perfectly fulfilled every aspect of God's will. Jesus, the true Prophet, came not only to deliver God's word but to embody it (John 1:1). His life was marked by absolute submission to the Father's will, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). Unlike the man of God who succumbed to deception regarding food and a path, Jesus famously resisted temptation in the wilderness, quoting Scripture to defeat the devil's lies and refusing to turn stones into bread or take a shortcut to glory (Matthew 4:1-11). He declared, "My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to finish his work" (John 4:34), perfectly embodying the spirit of obedience that the man of God initially displayed. Furthermore, while the man of God was commanded to return by a different way, Jesus is the definitive "way" back to God, the only path to salvation and reconciliation (John 14:6). In Christ, the consequences of humanity's disobedience, tragically illustrated by the man of God's fate, are fully borne and overcome, offering forgiveness and new life to all who trust in His perfect obedience and atoning sacrifice (Romans 5:19).