TRV
Translation
Berean Standard Bible
So the prophet said to the man of God, “Come home with me and eat some bread.”
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 9,200 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Kings 13 verses 11–22
11 ¶ Now there dwelt an old prophet in Bethel; and his sons came and told him all the works that the man of God had done that day in Bethel: the words which he had spoken unto the king, them they told also to their father.
12 And their father said unto them, What way went he? For his sons had seen what way the man of God went, which came from Judah.
13 And he said unto his sons, Saddle me the ass. So they saddled him the ass: and he rode thereon,
14 And went after the man of God, and found him sitting under an oak: and he said unto him, Art thou the man of God that camest from Judah? And he said, I am.
15 Then he said unto him, Come home with me, and eat bread.
16 And he said, I may not return with thee, nor go in with thee: neither will I eat bread nor drink water with thee in this place:
17 For it was said to me by the word of the LORD, Thou shalt eat no bread nor drink water there, nor turn again to go by the way that thou camest.
18 He said unto him, I am a prophet also as thou art; and an angel spake unto me by the word of the LORD, saying, Bring him back with thee into thine house, that he may eat bread and drink water. But he lied unto him.
19 So he went back with him, and did eat bread in his house, and drank water.
20 And it came to pass, as they sat at the table, that the word of the LORD came unto the prophet that brought him back:
21 And he cried unto the man of God that came from Judah, saying, Thus saith the LORD, Forasmuch as thou hast disobeyed the mouth of the LORD, and hast not kept the commandment which the LORD thy God commanded thee,
22 But camest back, and hast eaten bread and drunk water in the place, of the which the LORD did say to thee, Eat no bread, and drink no water; thy carcase shall not come unto the sepulchre of thy fathers.
The man of God had honestly and resolutely refused the king's invitation, though he promised him a reward; yet he was over-persuaded by an old prophet to come back with him, and dine in Beth-el, contrary to the command given him. Here we find how dearly his dinner cost him. Observe with wonder,
I. The old prophet's wickedness. I cannot but call him a false prophet and a bad man, it being much easier to believe that from one of such a bad character should be extorted a confirmation of what the man of God said (as we find, Kg1 13:32) than that a true prophet, and a good man, should tell such a deliberate lie as he did, and father it upon God. A good tree could never bring forth such corrupt fruit. Perhaps he was trained up among the sons of the prophets, in one of Samuel's colleges not far off, whence he retained the name of a prophet, but, growing worldly and profane, the spirit of prophecy had departed from him. If he had been a good prophet he would have reproved Jeroboam's idolatry, and not have suffered his sons to attend his altars, as, it should seem, they did. Now, 1. Whether he had any good design in fetching back the man of God is not certain. One may hope that he did it in compassion to him, concluding he wanted refreshment, and out of a desire to be better acquainted with him and more fully to understand his errand than he could from the report of his sons; yet his sons having told him all that passed, and particularly that the prophet was forbidden to eat or drink there, which he had openly told Jeroboam, I suppose it was done with a bad design, to draw him into a snare, and so to expose him; for false prophets have ever been the worst enemies to the true prophets, usually aiming to destroy them, but sometimes, as here, to debauch them and draw them from their duty. Thus they gave the Nazarites wine to drink (Amo 2:12), that they might glory in their fall. But, 2. It is certain that he took a very bad method to bring him back. When the man of God had told him, "I may not, and therefore I will not, return to eat bread with thee" (his resolutions concurring with the divine command, Kg1 13:16, Kg1 13:17), he wickedly pretended that he had an order from heaven to fetch him back. He imposed upon him by asserting his quondam character as a prophet: I am a prophet also as thou art; he pretended he had a vision of an angel that sent him on this errand. But it was all a lie; it was a banter upon prophecy, and profane in the highest degree. When this old prophet is spoken of (Kg2 23:18) he is called the prophet that came out of Samaria, whereas there was no such place as Samaria till long after, Kg1 16:24. Therefore I take it he is so called there, though he was of Beth-el, because he was like those who were afterwards the prophets of Samaria, who caused God's people Israel to err, Jer 23:13.
II. The good prophet's weakness, in suffering himself to be thus imposed upon: He went back with him, Kg1 13:19. He that had resolution enough to refuse the invitation of the king, who promised him a reward, could not resist the insinuations of one that pretended to be a prophet. God's people are more in danger of being drawn from their duty by the plausible pretences of divinity and sanctity than by external inducements; we have therefore need to beware of false prophets, and not believe every spirit.
III. The proceedings of divine justice hereupon; and here we may well wonder that the wicked prophet, who told the lie and did the mischief, went unpunished, while the holy man of God, that was drawn by him into sin, was suddenly and severely punished for it. What shall we make of this! The judgments of God are unfathomable. The deceived and the deceiver are his, and he giveth not account of any of his matters. Certainly there must be a judgment to come, when these things will be called over again, and when those that sinned most and suffered least, in this world, will receive according to their works. 1. The message delivered to the man of God was strange. His crime is recited, Kg1 13:21, Kg1 13:22. It was, in one word, disobedience to an express command. Judgment is given upon it: Thy carcase shall not come to the sepulchre of thy fathers, that is, "Thou shalt never reach thy own house, but shalt be a carcase quickly, nor shall thy dead body be brought to the place of thy fathers' sepulchres, to be interred." 2. Yet it was more strange that the old prophet himself should be the messenger. Of this we can give no account but that God would have it so, as he spoke to Balaam by his ass and read Saul his doom by the devil in Samuel's likeness. We may think God designed hereby, (1.) To startle the lying prophet, and make him sensible of his sin. The message could not but affect him the more when he himself had the delivering of it, and had so strong an impression made upon his spirit by it that he cried out, as one in an agony, Kg1 13:21. He had reason to think, if he must die for his disobedience in a small matter who sinned by surprise, of how much sorer punishment he should be thought worthy who had belied an angel of God and cheated a man of God by a deliberate forgery. If this were done to the green tree, what shall be done to the dry? Perhaps it had a good effect upon him. Those who preach God's wrath to others have hard hearts indeed if they fear it not themselves. (2.) To put the greater mortification upon the prophet that was deceived, and to show what those must expect who hearken to the great deceiver. Those that yield to him as a tempter will be terrified by him as a tormentor; whom he now fawns upon he will afterwards fly upon, and whom he now draws into sin he will do what he can to drive to despair.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 11–22. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Kings 13:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
First Kings 13:15 captures the pivotal moment when the old prophet of Bethel extends a deceptive invitation to the man of God from Judah, urging him to violate a direct divine command. This seemingly innocuous offer to "Come home with me, and eat bread" serves as the critical turning point in the tragic narrative, setting the stage for the man of God's disobedience, the subsequent divine judgment, and his untimely death, thereby powerfully illustrating the severe consequences of straying from God's explicit instructions.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse immediately follows the man of God's steadfast refusal of King Jeroboam's invitation to dine, a refusal explicitly grounded in the Lord's command not to eat or drink in Bethel, nor to return by the same way he came (1 Kings 13:8-9). The old prophet, residing in Bethel, hears of these extraordinary events—the man of God's prophecy against Jeroboam's altar, the king's withered hand, and its miraculous restoration. Driven by curiosity or perhaps a more sinister intent, the old prophet pursues the man of God. The invitation in 1 Kings 13:15 is the direct result of this pursuit, a seemingly benevolent gesture of hospitality that tragically becomes the instrument of the man of God's downfall, leading directly to his fatal disobedience detailed in the verses that follow (1 Kings 13:18-24).
Historical & Cultural Context: The setting is Bethel, a significant religious site in ancient Israel, which Jeroboam had corrupted by establishing a golden calf as an alternative worship center to Jerusalem (1 Kings 12:28-30). This act of idolatry was a direct affront to Yahweh, making Bethel a place of divine judgment. Hospitality was a deeply ingrained cultural norm in the ancient Near East, often considered a sacred duty. An invitation to "eat bread" was a common expression of fellowship, trust, and provision. However, in this narrative, the old prophet leverages this cultural expectation to deceive the man of God, highlighting how even sacred customs can be perverted. The narrative also underscores the precarious position of prophets in a divided kingdom, where loyalty to God often clashed with political or social pressures.
Key Themes: The passage powerfully explores several critical themes. Temptation and Deception are central, as the old prophet's seemingly benign invitation is a subtle form of temptation, designed to draw the man of God away from his divinely mandated abstinence. It vividly illustrates how spiritual deception can arise from unexpected sources, even from those who appear to be fellow believers or prophets. Another prominent theme is Unwavering Obedience to God's Specific Word. The narrative underscores the critical importance of adhering strictly to God's clear and unambiguous commands, even when faced with seemingly benevolent offers or conflicting spiritual advice. The man of God's initial unwavering obedience to the Lord's command (1 Kings 13:9) contrasts sharply with his later failure. Finally, the story highlights the Consequences of Disobedience. Although not immediately evident in this verse, accepting this invitation directly leads to the man of God's tragic death (1 Kings 13:24), illustrating the severe repercussions of straying from God's explicit instructions, even when deceived.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The narrative of 1 Kings 13, particularly this verse, is rich with Irony. The old prophet, ostensibly a man of God himself, uses the very language of spiritual fellowship and hospitality to deceive another man of God into disobeying the Lord. This is deeply ironic, as one would expect solidarity and truth from a fellow prophet, not deception. There is also strong Foreshadowing in this verse; the seemingly benign invitation directly foreshadows the man of God's tragic downfall and death, implying that his acceptance will lead to dire consequences. The narrative also employs Contrast, setting the initial unwavering obedience of the man of God to Jeroboam's offer against his eventual failure to resist the old prophet's seemingly more benign, yet equally dangerous, invitation. Finally, the act of "eating bread" functions as Symbolism, representing not just physical sustenance but the breaking of a divine covenant, the compromise of a sacred mission, and the entry into a fellowship that is contrary to God's explicit will.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The deceptive invitation in 1 Kings 13:15 serves as a profound theological lesson on the nature of obedience, the subtlety of temptation, and the critical importance of discerning spiritual counsel. It underscores that God's explicit commands are paramount and should not be overridden by seemingly benevolent offers or even by claims of new revelation that contradict established divine truth. The story warns against spiritual complacency and highlights that deception can come from unexpected sources, even from those who appear to be within the community of faith. It emphasizes that true faithfulness requires unwavering adherence to God's revealed will, even when it demands personal sacrifice or seems counter-intuitive to human wisdom or social norms.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The story of the man of God and the old prophet remains a potent cautionary tale for believers today. It challenges us to cultivate a deep and unwavering commitment to God's clear word, recognizing that temptation often comes disguised, not as overt evil, but as something seemingly good, hospitable, or even "spiritual." We are called to exercise vigilant discernment, not blindly accepting every voice that claims divine authority, but rigorously testing all counsel against the established truth of Scripture and the clear leading of the Holy Spirit. Our ultimate allegiance must be to God's direct commands, even when they seem inconvenient or when others, perhaps well-meaning but misguided, suggest an alternative path. The consequences of even seemingly small deviations from God's explicit will can be severe, reminding us that faithfulness is a lifelong journey requiring constant vigilance and absolute trust in the Lord alone.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was it so important for the man of God not to eat or drink in Bethel?
Answer: The Lord's command not to eat or drink in Bethel (1 Kings 13:9) was a specific, symbolic act of judgment and separation. Bethel had become a center of idolatry under King Jeroboam (1 Kings 12:28-30), and the man of God's refusal to partake in sustenance there underscored God's absolute rejection of the false worship. It was a visible sign of his divine mission and a test of his absolute obedience and unwavering commitment to God's holiness, demonstrating that he would not compromise with the defiled place.
Was the old prophet truly a prophet of God, or was he malicious?
Answer: The text does not explicitly state the old prophet's motives, making him a complex and enigmatic figure. He is identified as an "old prophet" (1 Kings 13:11), suggesting he had a history of prophetic activity, but his actions are clearly deceptive and lead to the man of God's death. He might have been a genuine prophet who had become disobedient or complacent, a false prophet, or simply a man testing the man of God out of curiosity or envy. Regardless of his personal spiritual state, his lie (1 Kings 13:18) was a direct contradiction of God's previously revealed word, making him an instrument of temptation and judgment. The story's focus is less on his character and more on the crucial lesson of obedience for the man of God.
What does this story teach us about spiritual authority?
Answer: This story powerfully teaches that God's ultimate authority, as revealed in His clear and unambiguous commands, takes precedence over any other voice, even one claiming divine inspiration. It underscores the principle that all prophetic words or spiritual counsel must be tested against the already established word of God (Deuteronomy 13:1-5). The man of God's failure to remember and prioritize the initial, clear instruction from the Lord, instead yielding to a later, contradictory claim, highlights the danger of spiritual gullibility and the necessity of discerning spirits (1 John 4:1). True spiritual authority is rooted in consistency with God's character and His revealed truth.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The tragic failure of the man of God in 1 Kings 13:15 and subsequent verses finds its ultimate contrast and fulfillment in the perfect obedience of Jesus Christ. Unlike the man of God who succumbed to a seemingly benign invitation to "eat bread" against God's command, Jesus, the true Man of God, faced far greater temptations and never deviated from the Father's will. In the wilderness, when tempted by Satan to turn stones into bread after a forty-day fast, Jesus steadfastly refused, declaring, "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word which proceedeth out of the mouth of God" (Matthew 4:4). This demonstrates His absolute reliance on and unwavering obedience to the Father's word, even in the face of extreme hunger. Jesus is the Bread of Life, who offers true spiritual nourishment that satisfies eternally, unlike the bread that led to the man of God's demise (John 6:35 and John 6:51). His entire life was an embodiment of perfect obedience, culminating in His voluntary submission to the Father's will on the cross, even to the point of death (Philippians 2:8). Jesus, as the Word made flesh, is the ultimate source of truth and life, against whom no deceptive word can stand, offering us not a cautionary tale of failure, but a perfect example of faithfulness and the promise of eternal life through His atoning sacrifice.