- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 13:11–22. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
The man of God had honestly and resolutely refused the king's invitation, though he promised him a reward; yet he was over-persuaded by an old prophet to come back with him, and dine in Beth-el, contrary to the command given him. Here we find how dearly his dinner cost him. Observe with wonder,
I.The old prophet's wickedness.
I cannot but call him a false prophet and a bad man, it being much easier to believe that from one of such a bad character should be extorted a confirmation of what the man of God said (as we find, Kg1 13:32) than that a true prophet, and a good man, should tell such a deliberate lie as he did, and father it upon God. A good tree could never bring forth such corrupt fruit. Perhaps he was trained up among the sons of the prophets, in one of Samuel's colleges not far off, whence he retained the name of a prophet, but, growing worldly and profane, the spirit of prophecy had departed from him. If he had been a good prophet he would have reproved Jeroboam's idolatry, and not have suffered his sons to attend his altars, as, it should seem, they did. Now,
1.Whether he had any good design in fetching back the man of God is not certain. One may hope that he did it in compassion to him, concluding he wanted refreshment, and out of a desire to be better acquainted with him and more fully to understand his errand than he could from the report of his sons; yet his sons having told him all that passed, and particularly that the prophet was forbidden to eat or drink there, which he had openly told Jeroboam, I suppose it was done with a bad design, to draw him into a snare, and so to expose him; for false prophets have ever been the worst enemies to the true prophets, usually aiming to destroy them, but sometimes, as here, to debauch them and draw them from their duty. Thus they gave the Nazarites wine to drink (Amo 2:12), that they might glory in their fall. But,
2.It is certain that he took a very bad method to bring him back. When the man of God had told him, "I may not, and therefore I will not, return to eat bread with thee" (his resolutions concurring with the divine command, Kg1 13:16, Kg1 13:17), he wickedly pretended that he had an order from heaven to fetch him back. He imposed upon him by asserting his quondam character as a prophet: I am a prophet also as thou art; he pretended he had a vision of an angel that sent him on this errand. But it was all a lie; it was a banter upon prophecy, and profane in the highest degree. When this old prophet is spoken of (Kg2 23:18) he is called the prophet that came out of Samaria, whereas there was no such place as Samaria till long after, Kg1 16:24. Therefore I take it he is so called there, though he was of Beth-el, because he was like those who were afterwards the prophets of Samaria, who caused God's people Israel to err, Jer 23:13.
II.The good prophet's weakness, in suffering himself to be thus imposed upon:
He went back with him, Kg1 13:19. He that had resolution enough to refuse the invitation of the king, who promised him a reward, could not resist the insinuations of one that pretended to be a prophet. God's people are more in danger of being drawn from their duty by the plausible pretences of divinity and sanctity than by external inducements; we have therefore need to beware of false prophets, and not believe every spirit.
III.The proceedings of divine justice hereupon; and here we may well wonder that the wicked prophet, who told the lie and did the mischief, went unpunished, while the holy man of God, that was drawn by him into sin, was suddenly and severely punished for it. What shall we make of this! The judgments of God are unfathomable. The deceived and the deceiver are his, and he giveth not account of any of his matters. Certainly there must be a judgment to come, when these things will be called over again, and when those that sinned most and suffered least, in this world, will receive according to their works. 1. The message delivered to the man of God was strange. His crime is recited, Kg1 13:21, Kg1 13:22. It was, in one word, disobedience to an express command. Judgment is given upon it: Thy carcase shall not come to the sepulchre of thy fathers, that is, "Thou shalt never reach thy own house, but shalt be a carcase quickly, nor shall thy dead body be brought to the place of thy fathers' sepulchres, to be interred." 2. Yet it was more strange that the old prophet himself should be the messenger. Of this we can give no account but that God would have it so, as he spoke to Balaam by his ass and read Saul his doom by the devil in Samuel's likeness. We may think God designed hereby, (1.) To startle the lying prophet, and make him sensible of his sin. The message could not but affect him the more when he himself had the delivering of it, and had so strong an impression made upon his spirit by it that he cried out, as one in an agony, Kg1 13:21. He had reason to think, if he must die for his disobedience in a small matter who sinned by surprise, of how much sorer punishment he should be thought worthy who had belied an angel of God and cheated a man of God by a deliberate forgery. If this were done to the green tree, what shall be done to the dry? Perhaps it had a good effect upon him. Those who preach God's wrath to others have hard hearts indeed if they fear it not themselves. (2.) To put the greater mortification upon the prophet that was deceived, and to show what those must expect who hearken to the great deceiver. Those that yield to him as a tempter will be terrified by him as a tormentor; whom he now fawns upon he will afterwards fly upon, and whom he now draws into sin he will do what he can to drive to despair.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
An angel spoke to me: This old man of Bethel was indeed a prophet, but he sinned in thus deceiving the man of God; the more because he pretended a revelation for what he did.
Continue studying 1 Kings 13:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
First Kings 13:18 marks a pivotal and tragic moment in the narrative of the man of God from Judah, revealing the deliberate deception perpetrated by an old prophet from Bethel. This verse details the old prophet's false claim of an angelic message from the LORD, which directly contradicted God's explicit command to the man of God, thereby enticing him into disobedience that would ultimately lead to his demise. It is a stark illustration of spiritual manipulation and the severe consequences of failing to adhere to God's clear word.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is central to the cautionary tale of the man of God from Judah, which dominates 1 Kings 13. Earlier in the chapter, the man of God was sent by the LORD to Bethel to prophesy against King Jeroboam's idolatrous altar, delivering a powerful message and a miraculous sign (1 Kings 13:1-5). Crucially, God had given him a strict and unambiguous command: he was not to eat bread or drink water in Bethel, nor was he to return by the same way he came (1 Kings 13:9). After steadfastly refusing Jeroboam's hospitality, the man of God is intercepted by an old prophet who, upon hearing of the events, actively seeks him out. Verse 18 records the old prophet's calculated lie, which directly leads to the man of God's fateful decision to violate God's clear instruction, culminating in his tragic death (1 Kings 13:23-24). The immediate preceding verses (1 Kings 13:11-17) describe the old prophet's pursuit and invitation, setting the stage for this critical moment of deception.
Historical & Cultural Context
The narrative is situated in the early period of the divided kingdom, specifically within the northern kingdom of Israel under King Jeroboam I. Jeroboam had established alternative, idolatrous worship centers at Bethel and Dan, complete with golden calves, to prevent his subjects from returning to Jerusalem to worship the LORD (1 Kings 12:26-33). Bethel, though historically significant for Israelite worship, had become a hub of apostasy. Prophets in ancient Israel functioned as God's spokespersons, but their authenticity was always subject to rigorous testing, particularly concerning their alignment with God's established word and the fulfillment of their prophecies (Deuteronomy 18:20-22). The cultural imperative of hospitality was strong, making the old prophet's invitation a socially compelling lure, even if deceitful. This story starkly illustrates the dangers of false prophecy and the profound challenge of discerning genuine divine messages in a context where spiritual authority was often claimed by many, yet true allegiance to the LORD was compromised.
Key Themes
This verse profoundly contributes to several critical themes within 1 Kings and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the paramount theme of unwavering obedience to God's explicit word, demonstrating the severe consequences of deviation, even when influenced by seemingly spiritual counsel. The man of God's initial steadfastness (1 Kings 13:8-10) sharply contrasts with his later capitulation, highlighting the vulnerability of even devoted servants. Secondly, it illuminates the pervasive danger of deception and false prophecy. The old prophet's lie is not merely a social falsehood but a spiritual manipulation, masquerading as divine revelation. This resonates deeply with warnings against false prophets and teachers throughout Scripture, such as in Jeremiah 14:14 and 2 Peter 2:1-3. Finally, the narrative explores the theme of divine judgment and accountability, showing that even God's chosen messengers are not exempt from the consequences of disobedience, emphasizing God's unwavering commitment to the integrity of His word and His righteous standards.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
The Hebrew word נָבִיא (nâbîyʼ), translated as "prophet," denotes an inspired person, one who speaks on behalf of God. This term carries significant weight, implying direct divine communication and authority. In this verse, the old prophet's assertion "I am a prophet also as thou art" attempts to establish parity and credibility, leveraging the sacred office to lend legitimacy to his subsequent fabricated message. The irony lies in the fact that a title signifying divine truth-telling is used here as a tool for profound deception.
The Hebrew term דָבָר (dâbâr), rendered "word," is highly significant, encompassing not only spoken words but also matters, affairs, decrees, and divine pronouncements. When used in conjunction with "of the LORD" (dâbâr Yᵉhôvâh), it refers to a direct, authoritative message or command from God. The old prophet's claim of an angelic message "by the word of the LORD" is a deliberate misuse of this sacred concept, aiming to elevate his lie to the status of undeniable divine truth, directly challenging the man of God's prior, genuine "word of the LORD."
The Hebrew verb כָּחַשׁ (kāḥash), translated as "lied," carries a strong connotation of being untrue, feigning, denying, or dealing falsely. It implies a deliberate act of deception, often with an intent to mislead or betray. This is not a casual untruth but a calculated spiritual fraud, presenting a human invention as a divine decree. The narrator's explicit declaration "But he lied unto him" is a crucial divine commentary, revealing the malicious intent and the gravity of the old prophet's actions, underscoring the spiritual fraud at play.
Verse Breakdown
"He said unto him, I [am] a prophet also as thou [art];"
This opening clause establishes the old prophet's strategic maneuver to gain the man of God's trust and undermine his resolve. By asserting his own prophetic status and claiming kinship ("also as thou art"), the old prophet attempts to create a false sense of shared spiritual authority. This statement is designed to make his subsequent "revelation" appear equally, if not more, legitimate than the man of God's direct command, leveraging a shared sacred identity to facilitate deception.
"and an angel spake unto me by the word of the LORD, saying, Bring him back with thee into thine house, that he may eat bread and drink water."
This is the core of the old prophet's calculated falsehood. He claims a direct, angelic revelation from the LORD, specifically designed to contradict the man of God's explicit divine instruction not to eat or drink in Bethel (1 Kings 13:9). The invocation of "an angel" and "the word of the LORD" lends a powerful, divine imprimatur to his false message, making it incredibly difficult for the man of God to refuse without appearing to defy God Himself. The specific invitation to "eat bread and drink water" directly targets the prohibition given to the man of God, making the lie a direct assault on his obedience.
"[But] he lied unto him."
This concise, stark declaration by the narrator immediately exposes the old prophet's deception, leaving no ambiguity for the reader. It functions as a divine commentary, revealing the true nature of the old prophet's utterance as a deliberate, malicious fabrication. This parenthetical statement is crucial; it unveils the spiritual fraud and highlights the profound evil intent behind the old prophet's words, setting the stage for the tragic consequences that inevitably follow. It emphasizes that the man of God was not merely mistaken but was actively and knowingly deceived by a falsehood presented as divine truth.
Literary Devices
The narrative of 1 Kings 13, and particularly verse 18, is rich with literary devices that amplify its cautionary message and heighten its dramatic impact. Irony is profoundly evident, as an old prophet, ostensibly a servant of the LORD and a guardian of divine truth, becomes the instrument of deception leading another prophet to disobedience and death. The very person who should have upheld God's word actively undermines it through falsehood. There is significant Foreshadowing in this verse; the lie spoken here directly precipitates the man of God's disobedience, which the reader knows from the broader narrative will lead to his demise. The narrator's immediate revelation, "But he lied unto him," serves as a dramatic narrative intrusion or aside, directly informing the reader of the truth and establishing a clear moral judgment. This technique not only builds suspense but also highlights the gravity of the old prophet's actions, creating a stark contrast between the deceptive words and the divine reality, emphasizing the clear distinction between truth and falsehood. The old prophet's use of spiritual language ("an angel spake unto me by the word of the LORD") to deliver a lie is a powerful example of perversion, twisting sacred authority for malevolent ends.
Theological and Thematic Connections
First Kings 13:18 serves as a profound theological warning about the nature of truth, the absolute authority of God's word, and the perilous consequences of spiritual deception. It underscores that God's commands are immutable and not subject to modification or contradiction by subsequent "revelations," especially when those revelations originate from questionable sources or contradict previously established divine directives. The narrative highlights the critical importance of spiritual discernment, reminding believers that even those who claim prophetic or spiritual authority can be agents of falsehood. God holds His servants accountable for their obedience to His clear word, irrespective of the persuasive power of deceptive voices. This tragic account emphasizes that genuine prophecy always aligns with God's established character and previous revelation, and any message that contradicts a direct divine command should be immediately suspect and rejected.
Reflection and Application
The story of the man of God from Judah and the old prophet of Bethel offers timeless and urgent lessons for believers navigating a world filled with competing voices and claims of truth. It compels us to cultivate a deep and unwavering commitment to God's revealed Word, the Scripture, as our ultimate and unassailable authority. In an age saturated with information, diverse spiritual claims, and the allure of "new revelations," the ability to discern between truth and falsehood is not merely beneficial but paramount for spiritual survival. We are challenged to prioritize God's clear commands above all else, recognizing that even seemingly well-intentioned or spiritually authoritative advice can lead us astray if it contradicts what God has already plainly spoken in His Word. This narrative calls us to a posture of humility, vigilance, and constant reliance on the Holy Spirit for discernment, ensuring that our obedience is to God alone and not to the persuasive, yet potentially deceptive, words of others. It forces us to ask: Is my faith built on the rock of God's unchanging truth, or the shifting sands of human opinion and spiritual manipulation?
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why would the old prophet lie to the man of God, especially since he was also a prophet?
The biblical text does not explicitly state the old prophet's motivation, leading to various interpretations among scholars. Some suggest his actions stemmed from envy or jealousy of the man of God's direct commission and powerful ministry, perhaps feeling his own prophetic authority diminished in a region steeped in apostasy. Others propose a desire to test the man of God's obedience, albeit through a deceptive and unauthorized means. It's also possible he was a genuine prophet who had compromised his integrity or fallen into spiritual apostasy due to Jeroboam's idolatry, and his actions reflect a twisted sense of spiritual authority or even a demonic influence. Regardless of the precise motive, his actions were a deliberate act of spiritual malice, directly contradicting God's word and leading to tragic consequences, highlighting the insidious nature of deception, even from those who appear to be spiritual leaders. His lie underscores that even those with a prophetic calling can fall prey to spiritual corruption and become instruments of falsehood.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The tragic narrative of 1 Kings 13:18, with its emphasis on deception, disobedience, and the severe consequences of deviating from God's clear word, finds its ultimate fulfillment and resolution in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the man of God from Judah failed to maintain his obedience in the face of a lie, Jesus is the Prophet par excellence who perfectly obeyed the Father's will in every detail, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). He is the Word made flesh, the embodiment of divine truth who never lied and always spoke the Father's perfect word, declaring, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). In a world full of false prophets and deceptive voices, Jesus stands as the true Shepherd whose voice His sheep know and follow (John 10:27), offering infallible discernment and protection from spiritual lies. His perfect obedience and sacrificial death not only expose the destructive nature of sin and disobedience but also provide the path to reconciliation and eternal life for all who trust in Him, overcoming the very deception that led to the man of God's downfall and offering a new covenant of grace where God's law is written on hearts (Hebrews 8:10).