Skip to content

Joshua 13:20

“The Territory of Reuben”· Joshua 13:15–23Read in context
King James Version
And Bethpeor, and Ashdothpisgah, and Bethjeshimoth,
KJV (with Strong's)
And Bethpeor H1047, and Ashdothpisgah H798 H794, and Bethjeshimoth H1020,
Complete Jewish Bible
Beit-P'or, the slopes of Pisgah, Beit-Yeshimot,
Berean Standard Bible
Beth-peor, the slopes of Pisgah, and Beth-jeshimoth—
American Standard Version
and Beth-peor, and the slopes of Pisgah, and Beth-jeshimoth,
World English Bible Messianic
Beth Peor, the slopes of Pisgah, Beth Jeshimoth,
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Beth-peor, and Ashdoth-pisgah, and Beth-ieshimoth:
Young's Literal Translation
and Beth-Peor, and the springs of Pisgah, and Beth-Jeshimoth,
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,175 of 31,102 · 19.9%

Study this verse

Summary

Joshua 13:20 meticulously lists three significant geographical locations—Bethpeor, Ashdothpisgah, and Bethjeshimoth—as integral parts of the tribal inheritance allocated to the Reubenites. This verse, seemingly a mere catalog of place names, underscores the divine precision and faithfulness in the fulfillment of God's ancient covenant promises, meticulously detailing the boundaries of the Promised Land for His people.

Context

Literary Context

Joshua chapter 13 marks a pivotal transition in the book of Joshua. Having largely completed the initial conquest of Canaan, the narrative shifts from warfare to the detailed division of the land among the Israelite tribes. The chapter opens with God instructing an aged Joshua to distribute the remaining unconquered territory, emphasizing that the land, though not fully subdued, was already given by divine decree. Verses 8-33 specifically detail the inheritance of the tribes east of the Jordan River—Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh—a distribution initiated by Moses before his death, as recorded in Deuteronomy 3:12-17. Within this larger section, Joshua 13:15-23 focuses specifically on Reuben's portion. Verse 20, therefore, is a precise geographical marker within the detailed inventory of Reuben's tribal boundaries, contributing to the comprehensive record of Israel's divinely ordained land tenure.

Historical & Cultural Context

The division of land was a foundational act for the nascent Israelite nation, transitioning them from nomadic wanderers to settled inhabitants with defined territorial identities. This process was not merely administrative but deeply theological, rooted in God's covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, promising them the land of Canaan as an eternal possession (Genesis 12:7). The specific locations mentioned in Joshua 13:20 carry significant historical weight. Bethpeor, for instance, is infamous as the site of Israel's idolatry and sexual immorality with the Moabites, involving the worship of Baal-peor, which led to a devastating plague (Numbers 25:1-9). Ashdothpisgah refers to the "ravines of Pisgah," a prominent peak in the Abarim mountain range from which Moses viewed the Promised Land before his death (Deuteronomy 34:1-4). These names are not arbitrary but serve as historical anchors, connecting Reuben's inheritance to key moments in Israel's wilderness journey and early history.

Key Themes

The meticulous listing of towns and boundaries in Joshua 13 and specifically in Joshua 13:20 powerfully reinforces several overarching themes of the book of Joshua and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it highlights the Fulfillment of God's Promises, demonstrating Yahweh's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant word, as the land promised generations ago is now being physically apportioned. Secondly, it underscores Divine Order and Specificity, revealing God's precise and orderly nature in orchestrating the division of the land, ensuring each tribe received its designated portion with clear, divinely appointed boundaries. This reflects a God who is intimately involved in the details of His people's lives and destiny. Thirdly, the emphasis on Tribal Inheritance establishes the distinct identity and territorial security of each tribe within the Promised Land, laying the groundwork for their future national and religious life. The inclusion of places with significant past events also subtly introduces the theme of Remembering History, serving as a reminder of both divine faithfulness and human failure.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Bethpeor Bêyth Pᵉʻôwr' H1047

From "house" and "Peor," meaning "house of Peor." This location is primarily remembered for its association with the idolatrous worship of Baal-peor and the subsequent plague that afflicted Israel in Numbers 25. Its inclusion here is a stark reminder of past national sin and the consequences of compromising with pagan practices. The name itself signifies a place of cultic significance, now claimed by Israel.

Ashdothpisgah ʼAshdôwth hap-Piçgâh' H798

From the plural of ʼăshêdâh (ravine) and Piçgâh (Pisgah), meaning "ravines of the Pisgah." This refers to the foothills or lower slopes of Mount Pisgah, a prominent peak within the Abarim mountain range. Mount Pisgah holds immense significance as the vantage point from which Moses was granted a panoramic view of the entire Promised Land before his death, as recounted in Deuteronomy 34:1. Its inclusion links Reuben's territory to a site of profound prophetic vision and the end of the Mosaic era.

Bethjeshimoth Bêyth ha-Yshîy-môwth' H1020

From "house" and the plural of Yshîy-môwth (desert), meaning "house of the deserts." This name likely describes the geographical character of the area—a more arid or desolate region, possibly bordering the wilderness or the Dead Sea. Its name suggests a less fertile, perhaps more remote, part of the inheritance, highlighting the diversity of the land allotted to Reuben.

Verse Breakdown

"And Bethpeor"

This marks the first of three specific towns or regions listed as part of Reuben's inheritance. Its particular historical notoriety (as the site of the Baal-peor incident) adds a layer of theological weight to its inclusion, serving as a silent, yet potent, reminder of Israel's past failures and God's judgment, even as they inherit the land.

"and Ashdothpisgah"

This second geographical marker points to the ravines or slopes of Mount Pisgah, a site deeply significant in Israelite history as the place where Moses viewed the Promised Land before his death. Its inclusion connects Reuben's territory to the culmination of the wilderness journey and the fulfillment of God's promise to Moses, even if he could not enter.

"and Bethjeshimoth"

The final location in this list, "house of deserts," likely indicates a town situated in a more desolate or wilderness-adjacent area. This detail contributes to the precise delineation of Reuben's boundaries, showing the extent and varied nature of their allotted land, from more fertile areas to the fringes of the wilderness.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in Joshua 13:20, and indeed throughout the detailed land allotments in Joshua, is Cataloging or Listing. This meticulous enumeration of places serves to emphasize the precision and completeness of the divine promise's fulfillment. Each name, though seemingly mundane, acts as a Toponym (a place name) that carries historical, geographical, and often theological significance, transforming a simple list into a rich tapestry of Israel's past and future. The repetition of the conjunction "and" (Polysyndeton) before each location creates a sense of exhaustive detail and methodical progression, reinforcing the idea that every part of the promised land, down to its specific towns, was divinely ordained and meticulously accounted for. This detailed listing also functions as a form of Verisimilitude, lending an air of historical accuracy and authenticity to the narrative, assuring the reader of the tangible reality of God's covenant faithfulness.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Joshua 13:20, though a simple list of place names, is profoundly theological. It testifies to God's meticulous faithfulness in fulfilling His ancient covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants, demonstrating that His word is not vague but precise and tangible. The detailed allocation of land, down to specific towns, underscores God's divine order and sovereignty over the earth and the destiny of nations. Furthermore, the inclusion of places like Bethpeor, a site of national apostasy, serves as a subtle, yet powerful, reminder of Israel's past failures and the enduring consequences of sin, even as they enter into their inheritance. This juxtaposition highlights God's grace in still granting the land despite their unfaithfulness, while simultaneously providing a historical marker for future generations to learn from.

Reflection and Application

The seemingly dry list of names in Joshua 13:20 offers profound spiritual lessons for contemporary believers. Just as God meticulously fulfilled His promises to Israel, providing them with a tangible inheritance down to the specific towns, so too does He work with precision and faithfulness in our lives. This verse reminds us that God's promises are not abstract but are concretely realized, often in specific and tailored ways that meet our deepest needs. It encourages us to trust in His detailed providence, knowing that He oversees every aspect of our lives and has a specific "inheritance" for us, whether it be spiritual blessings, a particular calling, or the assurance of eternal life. Moreover, the historical markers within Reuben's territory serve as a reminder to learn from both the triumphs and failures of those who came before us. We are called to remember God's faithfulness through generations and to guard against the temptations that led Israel astray, such as idolatry and disobedience. Our spiritual journey is also marked by specific "places" of encounter, challenge, and growth, each contributing to our divinely appointed path.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the meticulous detail of God's land distribution in Joshua 13:20 encourage your trust in His precise and faithful care for your own life?
  2. What "historical markers" in your own spiritual journey—moments of failure or triumph—can serve as reminders for future growth and obedience?
  3. In what ways do you perceive your spiritual "inheritance" in Christ to be as specific and tangible as the physical land inheritance was for Israel?

FAQ

Why is a verse listing place names important for understanding the Bible?

A verse like Joshua 13:20, though seemingly just a list of names, is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it provides concrete evidence of God's faithfulness in fulfilling His ancient covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants to give them the land of Canaan (Genesis 12:7). The meticulous detail underscores the tangible reality of this divine promise. Secondly, these place names often carry significant historical and theological weight. For instance, Bethpeor recalls a major incident of Israelite apostasy (Numbers 25:1-9), serving as a reminder of past lessons. Thirdly, the detailed geographical delineation establishes the tribal identities and boundaries, which were foundational for the social, political, and religious structure of ancient Israel. It shows God's orderly nature in establishing His people.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

While Joshua 13:20 details a physical land inheritance for the tribe of Reuben, its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment lies in the spiritual inheritance believers receive through Christ. Just as Israel received a specific, tangible portion of the Promised Land, believers in Christ are granted an "inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you" (1 Peter 1:4). The meticulous detail of the land division foreshadows the precision of God's redemptive plan, culminating in Christ, who is the ultimate "Promised Land" and the source of all spiritual blessings (Ephesians 1:3). The historical markers within Reuben's territory also point to Christ: the sin at Bethpeor, where idolatry led to death, is overcome by Christ, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, providing true atonement and cleansing. Moses viewing the land from Pisgah, unable to enter due to sin, foreshadows Christ, the greater Moses and ultimate High Priest, who not only leads His people into the true rest but also enters the heavenly sanctuary on their behalf (Hebrews 4:8-10 and Hebrews 9:24). Thus, the specific land allotments in Joshua ultimately direct our gaze to the comprehensive and eternal inheritance found only in Jesus Christ.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Joshua 13:7–33. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 27 verses
Passage under commentJoshua 13:7–33
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here we have, I. Orders given to Joshua to assign to each tribe its portion of this land, including that which was yet unsubdued, which must be brought into the lot, in a believing confidence that it should be conquered when Israel was multiplied so as to have occasion for it (Jos 13:7): Now divide this land. Joshua thought all must be conquered before any must be divided. "No," said, God, "there is as much conquered as will serve your turn for the present; divide this, and make your best of it, and wait for the remainder hereafter." Note, We must take the comfort of what we have, though we cannot compass all we would have. Observe,

1.The land must be divided among the several tribes, and they must not always live in common, as now they did. Which way soever a just property is acquired, it is the will of that God who has given the earth to the children of men that there should be such a thing, and that every man should know his own, and not invade that which is another's. The world must be governed, not by force, but right, by the law of equity, not of arms.

2.That it must be divided for an inheritance, though they got it by conquest.

(1.)The promise of it came to them as an inheritance from their fathers; the land of promise pertained to the children of promise, who were thus beloved for their fathers' sakes, and in performance of the covenant with them.

(2.)The possession of it was to be transmitted by them, as an inheritance to their children. Frequently, what is got by force is soon lost again; but Israel, having an incontestable title to this land by the divine grant, might see it hereby secured as an inheritance to their seed after them, and that God kept this mercy for thousands.

3.That Joshua must not divide it by his own will. Though he was a very wise, just, and good man, it must not be left to him to give what he pleased to each tribe; but he must do it by lot, which referred the matter wholly to God, and to his determination, for he it is that appoints the bounds of our habitation, and every man's judgment must proceed from him. But Joshua must preside in this affair, must manage this solemn appeal to Providence, and see that the lot was drawn fairly and without fraud, and that every tribe did acquiesce in it. The lot indeed causeth contention to cease, Pro 18:18. But, if upon this lot any controversy should arise, Joshua by his wisdom and authority must determine it, and prevent any ill consequences of it. Joshua must have the honour of dividing the land,

(1.)Because he had undergone the fatigue of conquering it: and when, through his hand, each tribe received its allotment, they would thereby be made the more sensible of their obligations to him. And what a pleasure must it needs be to a man of such a public spirit as Joshua was to see the people that were so dear to him eating of the labour of his hands!

(2.)That he might be herein a type of Christ, who has not only conquered for us the gates of hell, but has opened to us the gates of heaven, and, having purchased the eternal inheritance for all believers, will in due time put them all in possession of it.

II.An account is here given of the distribution of the land on the other side Jordan among the Reubenites, and Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh. Observe,

1.How this account is introduced. It comes in,

(1.)As the reason why this land within Jordan must be divided only to the nine tribes and a half, because the other two and a half were already provided for.

(2.)As a pattern to Joshua in the work he had now to do. He had seen Moses distribute that land, which would give him some aid in distributing this, and thence he might take his measure; only this was to be done by lot, but it should seem Moses did that himself, according to the wisdom given unto him.

(3.)As an inducement to Joshua to hasten the dividing of this land, that the nine tribes and a half might not be kept any longer than was necessary out of their possession, since their brethren of the two tribes and a half were so well settled in theirs; and God their common Father would not have such a difference made between his children.

2.The particulars of this account.

(1.)Here is a general description of the country that was given to the two tribes and a half, which Moses gave them, even as Moses gave them, Jos 13:8. The repetition implies a ratification of the grant by Joshua. Moses settled this matter, and, as Moses settled it, so shall it rest; Joshua will not, under any pretence whatsoever, go about to alter it. And a reason is intimated why he would not, because Moses was the servant of the Lord, and acted in this matter by secret direction from him and was faithful as a servant. Here we have,

[1.]The fixing of the boundaries of this country, by which they were divided from the neighbouring nations, Jos 13:9, etc. Israel must know their own and keep to it, and may not, under pretence of their being God's peculiar people, encroach upon their neighbours, and invade their rights and properties, to which they had a good and firm title by providence, though not, as Israel, a title by promise.

[2.]An exception of one part of this country from Israel's possession, though it was in their grant, namely, the Geshurites and the Maachathites, Jos 13:13. They had not leisure to reduce all the remote and obscure corners of the country in Moses's time, and afterwards they had no mind to it, being easy with what they had. Thus those who are not straitened in God's promises are yet straitened in their own faith, and prayers, and endeavours.

(2.)A very particular account of the inheritances of these two tribes and a half, how they were separated from each other, and what cites, with the towns, villages, and fields, commonly known and reputed to be appurtenances to them, belonged to each tribe. This is very fully and exactly set down in order that posterity might, in reading this history, be the more affected with the goodness of God to their ancestors, when they found what a large and fruitful country, and what abundance of great and famous cities, he put them in possession of (God's grants look best when we descend to the particulars); and also that the limits of every tribe being punctually set down in this authentic record disputes might be prevented, and such contests between the tribes as commonly happen where boundaries have not been adjusted nor this matter brought to a certainty. And we have reason to think that the register here prescribed and published of the lot of each tribe was of great use to Israel in after-ages, was often appealed to, and always acquiesced in, for the determining of meum and tuum - mine and thine.

[1.]We have here the lot of the tribe of Reuben, Jacob's first-born, who, though he had lost the dignity and power which pertained to the birthright, yet, it seems, had the advantage of being first served. Perhaps those of that tribe had an eye to this in desiring to be seated on that side Jordan, that, since they could not expect the benefit of the best lot, they might have the credit of the first. Observe, First, In the account of the lot of this tribe mention is made of the slaughter, 1. Of Sihon, king of the Amorites, who reigned in this country, and might have kept it and his life if he would have been neighbourly, and have suffered Israel to pass through his territories, but, by attempting to oppose them, justly brought ruin upon himself, Num 21:21, etc. 2. Of the princes of Midian, who were slain afterwards in another war (Num 31:8), and yet are here called dukes of Sihon, and are said to be smitten with him, because they were either tributaries to him, or, in his opposition to Israel, confederates with him, and hearty in his interests, and his fall made way for theirs not long after. 3. Of Balaam particularly, that would, if he could, have cursed Israel, and was soon after recompensed according to the wickedness of his endeavour (Psa 28:4), for he fell with those that set him on. This was recorded before (Num 31:8), and is here repeated, because the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel was the turning of that curse into a blessing, and was such an instance of the power and goodness of God as was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance. See Mic 6:5. Secondly, Within the lot of this tribe was that Mount Pisgah from the top of which Moses took his view of the earthly Canaan and his flight to the heavenly. And not far off thence Elijah was when he was fetched up to heaven in a chariot of fire. The separation of this tribe from the rest, by the river Jordan, was that which Deborah lamented; and the preference they gave to their private interests above the public was what she censured, Jdg 5:15, Jdg 5:16. In this tribe lay Heshbon and Sibmah, famed for their fruitful fields and vineyards. See Isa 16:8, Isa 16:9; Jer 48:32. This tribe, with that of Gad, was sorely shaken by Hazael king of Syria (Kg2 10:33), and afterwards dislodged and carried into captivity, twenty years before the general captivity of the ten tribes by the king of Assyria, Ch1 5:26.

[2.]The lot of the tribe of Gad, Jos 13:24-28. This lay north of Reuben's lot; the country of Gilead lay in this tribe, so famous for its balm that it is thought strange indeed if there be no balm in Gilead, and the cities of Jabesh-Gilead and Ramoth-Gilead which we often read of in scripture. Succoth and Penuel, which we read of in the story of Gideon, were in this tribe; and that forest which is called the wood of Ephraim (from the slaughter Jephthah made there of the Ephraimites), in which Absalom's rebellious army was beaten, while his father David lay at Mahanaim, one of the frontier-cities of this tribe, Jos 13:26. Sharon, famous for roses, was in this tribe. And within the limits of this tribe lived those Gadarenes that loved their swine better than their Saviour, fitter to be called Girgashites than Israelites.

[3.]The lot of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Jos 13:29-31. Bashan, the kingdom of Og, was in this allotment, famous for the best timber, witness the oaks of Bashan - and the best breed of cattle, witness the bulls and rams of Bashan. This tribe lay north of Gad, reached to Mount Hermon, and had in it part of Gilead. Mispeh was in this half-tribe, and Jephthah was one of its ornaments; so was Elijah, for in this tribe was Thisbe, whence he is called the Tishbite; and Jair was another. In the edge of the tribe stood Chorazin, honoured with Christ's wondrous works, but ruined by his righteous woe for not improving them.

[4.]Twice in this chapter it is taken notice of that to the tribe of Levi Moses gave no inheritance (Jos 13:14, Jos 13:33), for so God had appointed, Num 18:20. If they had been appointed to a lot entire by themselves, Moses would have served them first, not because it was his own tribe, but because it was God's; but they must be provided for in another manner; their habitations must be scattered in all the tribes, and their maintenance brought out of all the tribes, and God himself was the portion both of their inheritance and of their cup, Deu 10:9; Deu 18:2.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 13:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8