Skip to content

Mark 8:32

“Jesus Predicts His Death and Resurrection”· Mark 8:31–33Read in context
King James Version
And he spake that saying openly. And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him.
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 he spake G2980 that saying G3056 openly G3954. And G2532 Peter G4074 took G4355 him G846, and began G756 to rebuke G2008 him G846.
Complete Jewish Bible
He spoke very plainly about it. Kefa took him aside and began rebuking him.
Berean Standard Bible
He spoke this message quite frankly, and Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him.
American Standard Version
And he spake the saying openly. And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him.
World English Bible Messianic
He spoke to them openly. Peter took him, and began to rebuke him.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And he spake that thing boldly. Then Peter tooke him aside, and began to rebuke him.
Young's Literal Translation
and openly he was speaking the word. And Peter having taken him aside, began to rebuke him,
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
All Mark Sites (Jerusalem)
All Mark Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Mark 8:27-30, Mark 8:31-9:0
Mark 8:27-30, Mark 8:31-9:0 View full PDF
All Mark Sites (Levant)
All Mark Sites (Levant) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,533 of 31,102 · 78.9%

Study this verse

Summary

Mark 8:32 presents a pivotal moment immediately following Peter's confession of Jesus as the Christ, where Jesus explicitly declares His impending suffering, death, and resurrection. This direct and unambiguous revelation provokes an astonishing response from Peter, who, misunderstanding the divine necessity of the cross, takes Jesus aside and begins to rebuke Him, highlighting the profound chasm between human expectations of a triumphant Messiah and God's redemptive plan for a suffering Servant.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is situated at a critical juncture in Mark's Gospel, marking a significant transition in Jesus' ministry. It immediately follows Peter's profound confession of Jesus' identity as "the Christ" in Mark 8:29, a watershed moment where the disciples' understanding of Jesus reaches a new level. In the very next verse, Mark 8:31, Jesus then makes His first explicit prediction of His suffering, rejection, death, and resurrection. Before this, Jesus had often spoken in parables or veiled language about His identity and mission, allowing His true nature to unfold gradually. However, after Peter's confession, the time for veiled language is over; Jesus now speaks "openly" about the path that lies ahead. Peter's reaction in Mark 8:32 sets the stage for Jesus' sharp rebuke in Mark 8:33 and His subsequent teaching on the cost of discipleship in Mark 8:34-38, emphasizing that following Him means embracing the cross.

Historical & Cultural Context

The Jewish people in Jesus' time lived under Roman occupation, and their Messianic expectations were largely shaped by prophecies of a conquering king who would liberate Israel and restore its glory, often envisioned as a military or political leader in the lineage of David. The idea of a Messiah who would suffer, be rejected, and die was profoundly counter-cultural and scandalous, directly contradicting the prevailing hopes for an earthly kingdom. The concept of a crucified Messiah was particularly abhorrent, as crucifixion was a humiliating form of execution reserved for criminals and rebels, signifying a curse rather than divine favor (Deuteronomy 21:23). Peter, like the other disciples, shared these deeply ingrained expectations, making Jesus' revelation of a suffering Messiah not only shocking but seemingly antithetical to their understanding of God's plan and the Messiah's role.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully illustrates several crucial themes within Mark's Gospel and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it highlights The Unveiling of the Suffering Messiah, as Jesus deliberately and plainly declares His destiny, challenging the popular Messianic expectations of His day. This radical departure from conventional thought is a pivotal teaching moment for His followers, revealing the true nature of His redemptive mission. Secondly, Peter's immediate reaction underscores the pervasive Human Misunderstanding of God's Plan. The disciples, clinging to their earthly hopes for a glorious king, struggle to reconcile these desires with Jesus' revelation of a suffering servant. Peter's attempt to "rebuke" Jesus exposes a deep-seated spiritual immaturity and a failure to grasp the necessity of the cross for salvation. Finally, the interaction reveals the theme of Opposition to Divine Will, even when rooted in seemingly good intentions. While Peter's actions may have stemmed from love or protectiveness for his Master, they inadvertently opposed God's predetermined plan for redemption, setting the stage for Jesus' sharp identification of Peter's thoughts as being "of men" rather than "of God" in Mark 8:33.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

openly parrhēsía' G3954

Meaning "all out-spokenness, i.e., frankness, bluntness, publicity; by implication, assurance." Jesus' use of this word here is highly significant. It emphasizes that He was not speaking in parables, riddles, or veiled language, as He often had before (e.g., Mark 4:10-12). Instead, His declaration about His impending suffering, death, and resurrection was direct, unambiguous, and without reservation. This clarity underscores the gravity of the truth He was imparting and highlights the stark contrast with the disciples' inability to comprehend it.

took proslambánō' G4355

Meaning "to take to oneself, i.e., use (food), lead (aside), admit (to friendship or hospitality)." In this context, Peter "took him aside," suggesting a private, perhaps even possessive, gesture. It implies an attempt to draw Jesus away from the other disciples, perhaps to speak to Him confidentially, to protect Him from what Peter perceived as a dangerous or mistaken path, or to correct Him. This action itself is presumptuous, as it positions Peter as one who can advise or even direct his Master.

rebuke epitimáō' G2008

Meaning "to tax upon, i.e., censure or admonish; by implication, forbid." This is a strong verb, typically used by someone in authority to correct or silence an inferior. It is the same word used for Jesus rebuking demons (Mark 1:25) or the wind and waves (Mark 4:39). For Peter, a disciple, to use this word towards Jesus, his Lord and the Christ, is astonishing and reveals a profound misunderstanding of Jesus' identity and mission, as well as Peter's own place in the divine order.

Verse Breakdown

"And he spake that saying openly."

This clause emphasizes Jesus' deliberate and transparent communication. Following Peter's confession of Him as the Christ, Jesus no longer speaks in veiled terms about His identity or mission. He clearly and unequivocally articulates the necessity of His suffering, death, and resurrection, laying bare the divine plan for redemption that would involve His passion. The term "openly" (parrhesia) highlights the stark, unadorned truth being presented.

"And Peter took him,"

This action by Peter is highly significant. It implies a physical gesture of pulling Jesus aside, away from the other disciples, perhaps to speak to Him privately. This act is laden with presumptuousness, as Peter, a mere disciple, assumes the right to counsel or even correct his Master. It suggests a desire to control the narrative or to prevent Jesus from continuing on a path that Peter deemed dangerous or mistaken, reflecting his human, earthly understanding of the Messiah's role.

"and began to rebuke him."

This is the climax of Peter's astonishing reaction. The word "rebuke" (epitimáō) is powerful and usually employed by someone in a position of authority to admonish or silence. For Peter to use such a strong term against Jesus, whom he had just confessed as the Christ, reveals the depth of his misunderstanding and his inability to reconcile the concept of a suffering Messiah with his preconceived notions of a triumphant, earthly king. His action, though perhaps well-intentioned from a human perspective, stands in direct opposition to God's sovereign will and redemptive plan.

Literary Devices

Mark 8:32 is rich in Irony and Dramatic Tension. The Irony is profound: immediately after Peter correctly identifies Jesus as the Christ, he then attempts to correct the very Christ about His divine mission. Peter, the rock upon whom the church would be built, becomes a stumbling block, illustrating the paradoxical nature of human understanding versus divine wisdom. This moment creates immense Dramatic Tension, as the reader is confronted with the clash between Jesus' clear, divine revelation of His suffering destiny and the disciples' deeply ingrained, worldly expectations of a glorious, conquering Messiah. This tension foreshadows not only the cross itself but also the ongoing struggle of the disciples (and all believers) to fully grasp and accept God's ways, which often defy human logic and comfort. The abruptness of Peter's action and Jesus' subsequent sharp retort in the following verse further heighten this dramatic conflict.

Theological and Thematic Connections

This pivotal verse underscores the profound theological truth that God's ways are often radically different from human expectations and wisdom. Peter's attempt to "rebuke" Jesus reveals a common human tendency to resist divine plans that involve suffering, sacrifice, or a departure from our preconceived notions of success and glory. The cross, which Jesus openly declares as His destiny, was not a deviation from God's plan but its very heart, the necessary means for atonement and salvation. This moment highlights the essential nature of Christ's suffering as central to His messianic identity and mission, challenging any theology that seeks a crown without a cross. It also serves as a stark reminder that even those with genuine faith and good intentions can become instruments of opposition to God's will if their thinking is not aligned with divine wisdom.

Reflection and Application

Mark 8:32 serves as a powerful mirror, inviting us to examine our own hearts and the ways in which we, like Peter, might resist or attempt to redefine God's uncomfortable truths. In a world that often prizes comfort, success, and immediate gratification, the concept of suffering for a greater purpose can be deeply unsettling. This verse challenges us to consider whether our understanding of God's plan is shaped by human desires and worldly wisdom, or by humble submission to His revealed will, even when it involves personal sacrifice or a path we would not naturally choose. True discipleship calls for a radical realignment of our will with God's, embracing His purposes even when they seem counterintuitive or costly. It compels us to discern between thoughts that originate from God and those that are merely human or worldly, even when presented with seemingly good intentions.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life do my expectations of God's blessing or plan conflict with the reality of His call to suffering or sacrifice?
  2. How might I, like Peter, be tempted to "rebuke" God's will or try to redirect His purposes based on my own comfort or understanding?
  3. What practical steps can I take to better discern between human wisdom and divine wisdom in my daily decisions and spiritual journey?

FAQ

Why did Jesus speak "openly" about His suffering at this particular time?

Jesus began to speak "openly" about His impending suffering, death, and resurrection immediately after Peter's confession of Him as "the Christ" in Mark 8:29. Up until this point, Jesus had often used parables or more veiled language to speak about His identity and mission, allowing His true nature to unfold gradually. However, once His disciples, through Peter, had articulated a foundational understanding of His messianic identity, it was crucial for them to grasp the nature of His Messiahship. The popular expectation was for a conquering king, but Jesus needed to reveal that His path to salvation involved suffering and sacrifice. Speaking "openly" (parrēsía) was a deliberate pedagogical choice to clarify the true, divine purpose of His coming and to prepare His disciples for the scandalous reality of the cross, which was essential for their understanding of the kingdom of God.

What does Peter's rebuke reveal about his understanding of Jesus and the Messiah?

Peter's immediate and strong "rebuke" of Jesus reveals a profound misunderstanding of Jesus' true identity and the nature of the Messiah's mission, despite his recent confession of Jesus as the Christ. It indicates that Peter, like most of his Jewish contemporaries, held firmly to the popular expectation of a glorious, conquering Messiah who would establish an earthly kingdom and liberate Israel from Roman rule. The idea of a suffering and dying Messiah was completely antithetical to this vision. Peter's action, though perhaps stemming from a protective love for his Master, exposes his spiritual immaturity and his inability to reconcile his human, worldly desires for a triumphant king with God's divine plan for a suffering servant. Jesus' subsequent sharp rebuke of Peter in Mark 8:33 ("Get behind me, Satan! For you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of man") underscores that Peter's thinking was aligned with human wisdom, not divine truth, highlighting the spiritual battle at play.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Mark 8:32, though a moment of human misunderstanding and resistance, powerfully highlights the Christ-centered fulfillment of God's redemptive plan. Peter's attempt to "rebuke" Jesus from the path of suffering underscores the very necessity of Christ's unwavering obedience to the Father's will. Jesus' decision to speak "openly" about His impending passion was not a sign of weakness, but a deliberate act of divine resolve, revealing the core of His messianic identity as the suffering Servant prophesied in Isaiah 53. The cross, which Peter sought to prevent, was not a tragic accident but the very means by which Christ would achieve victory over sin and death, fulfilling the prophecies and securing salvation for humanity. Jesus' willingness to embrace the path of humiliation and death, as described in Philippians 2:5-8, demonstrates His perfect submission and His unique role as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). Thus, Peter's human resistance serves to magnify Christ's divine resolve, emphasizing that His suffering was not a failure of His mission but its very triumph, the ultimate expression of God's love and justice.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Mark 8:27–38. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 12 verses
Passage under commentMark 8:27–38
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have read a great deal of the doctrine Christ preached, and the miracles he wrought, which were many, and strange, and well-attested, of various kinds, and wrought in several places, to the astonishment of the multitudes that were eye-witnesses of them. It is now time for us to pause a little, and to consider what these things mean; the wondrous works which Christ then forbade the publishing of, being recorded in these sacred writings, are thereby published to all the world, to us, to all ages; now what shall we think of them? Is the record of those things designed only for an amusement, or to furnish us with matter for discourse? No, certainly these things are written, that we may believe that Jesus is the Christ the Son of God (Joh 20:31); and this discourse which Christ had with his disciples, will assist us in making the necessary reflections upon the miracles of Christ, and a right use of them. Three things we are here taught to infer from the miracles Christ wrought.

I.They prove that he is the true Messiah, the Son of God, and Saviour of the world:

this the works he did witnessed concerning him; and this his disciples, who were the eye-witnesses of those works, here profess their belief of; which cannot but be a satisfaction to us in making the same inference from them.

1.Christ enquired of them what the sentiments of the people were concerning him; Who did men say that I am? Mar 8:27. Note, Though it is a small thing for us to be judged of men, yet it may sometimes do us good to know what people say of us, not that we may seek our own glory, but that we may hear our faults. Christ asked them, not that he might be informed, but that they might observe it themselves, and inform one another.

2.The account they gave him, was such as plainly intimated the high opinion the people had of him. Though they came short of the truth, yet they were convinced by his miracles that he was an extraordinary person, sent from the invisible world with a divine commission. It is probable that they would have acknowledged him to be the Messiah, if they had not been possessed by their teachers with a notion that the Messiah must be a temporal Prince, appearing in external pomp and power, which the figure Christ made, would not comport with; yet (whatever the Pharisees said, whose copyhold was touched by the strictness and spirituality of his doctrine) none of the people said that he was a Deceiver, but some said that he was John Baptist, others Elias, others one of the prophets, Mar 8:28. All agreed that he was one risen from the dead.

3.The account they gave him of their own sentiments concerning him, intimated their abundant satisfaction in him, and in their having left all to follow him, which now, after some time of trial, they see no reason to repent; But whom say ye that I am? To this they have an answer ready, Thou art the Christ, the Messiah often promised, and long expected, Mar 8:29. To be a Christian indeed, is, sincerely to believe that Jesus is the Christ, and to act accordingly; and that he is so, plainly appears by his wondrous works. This they knew, and must shortly publish and maintain; but for the present they must keep it secret (Mar 8:30), till the proof of it was completed, and they were completely qualified to maintain it, by the pouring out of the Holy Ghost; and then let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made this same Jesus, whom ye crucified, both Lord and Christ, Act 2:36.

II.These miracles of Christ take off the offence of the cross, and assure us that Christ was, in it, not conquered, but a Conqueror.

Now that the disciples are convinced that Jesus is the Christ, they may bear to hear of his sufferings, which Christ now begins to give them notice of, Mar 8:31.

1.Christ taught his disciples that he must suffer many things, Though they had got over the vulgar error of the Messiah's being a temporal Prince, so far as to believe their Master to be the Messiah, notwithstanding his present meanness, yet still they retained it, so far as to expect that he would shortly appear in outward pomp and grandeur, and restore the kingdom to Israel; and therefore, to rectify that mistake, Christ here gives them a prospect of the contrary, that he must be rejected of the elders, and the chief priests, and the scribes, who, they expected, should be brought to own and prefer him; that, instead of being crowned, he must be killed, he must be crucified, and after three days he must rise again to a heavenly life, and to be no more in this world. This he spoke openly (Mar 8:32), parrēsia. He said it freely and plainly, and did not wrap it up in ambiguous expressions. The disciples might easily understand it, if they had not been very much under the power of prejudice: or, it intimates that he spoke it cheerfully and without any terror, and would have them to hear it so: he spoke that saying boldly, as one that not only knew he must suffer and die, but was resolved he would, and made it his own act and deed.

2.Peter opposed it; He took him, and began to rebuke him. Here Peter showed more love than discretion, a zeal for Christ and his safety, but not according to knowledge. He took him - proslabomenos. He took hold of him, as it were to stop and hinder him, took him in his arms, and embraced him (so some understand it); he fell on his neck, as impatient to hear that his dear Master should suffer such hard things; or he took him aside privately, and began to rebuke him. This was not the language of the least authority, but of the greatest affection, of that jealousy for the welfare of those we love, which is strong as death. Our Lord Jesus allowed his disciples to be free with him, but Peter here took too great a liberty.

3.Christ checked him for his opposition (Mar 8:33); He turned about, as one offended, and looked on his disciples, to see if the rest of them were of the same mind, and concurred with Peter in this, that, if they did, they might take the reproof to themselves, which he was now about to give to Peter; and he said, Get thee behind me, Satan. Peter little thought to have had such a sharp rebuke for such a kind dissuasive, but perhaps expected as much commendation now for his love as he had lately for his faith. Note, Christ sees that amiss in what we say and do, which we ourselves are not aware of, and knows what manner of spirit we are of, when we ourselves do not.

(1.)Peter spoke as one that did not rightly understand, nor had duly considered, the purposes and counsels of God. When he saw such proofs as he every day saw of the power of Christ, he might conclude that he could not be compelled to suffer; the most potent enemies could not overpower him whom diseases and deaths, whom winds and waves and devils themselves, were forced to obey and yield to: and when he saw so much of the wisdom of Christ every day, he might conclude that he would not choose to suffer but for some very great and glorious purposes; and therefore he ought not thus to have contradicted him, but to have acquiesced. He looked upon his death only as a martyrdom, like that of the prophets, which he thought might be prevented, if either he would take a little care not to provoke the chief priests, or to keep out of the way; but he knew not that the thing was necessary for the glory of God, the destruction of Satan, and the salvation of man, that the Captain of our salvation must be made perfect through sufferings, and so must bring many sons to glory. Note, The wisdom of man is perfect folly, when it pretends to give measures to the divine counsels. The cross of Christ, the great instance of God's power and wisdom, was to some a stumbling-block, and to others foolishness.

(2.)Peter spoke as one that did not rightly understand, nor had duly considered, the nature of Christ's kingdom; he took it to be temporal and human, whereas it is spiritual and divine. Thou savourest not the things that are of God, but those that are of men; ou phroneis - thou mindest not; so the word is rendered, Rom 8:5. Peter seemed to mind more the things that relate to the lower world, and the life that now is, than those which relate to the upper world, and the life to come. Minding the things of men more than the things of God, our own credit, ease, and safety, more than the things of God, and his glory and kingdom, is a very great sin, and the root of much sin, and very common among Christ's disciples; and it will appear in suffering times, those times of temptation, when those in whom the things of men have the ascendant, are in danger of falling off. Non sapis - Thou art not wise (so it may be read) in the things of God, but in the things of men. It is important to consider what generation we appear wise in, Luk 16:8. It seems policy to shun trouble, but if with that we shun duty, it is fleshly wisdom (Co2 1:12), and it will be folly in the end.

III.These miracles of Christ should engage us all to follow him, whatever it cost us, not only as they were confirmations of his mission, but as they were explications of his design, and the tendency of that grace which he came to bring; plainly intimating that by his Spirit he would do that for our blind, deaf, lame, leprous, diseased, possessed souls, which he did for the bodies of those many who in those distresses applied themselves to him. Frequent notice had been taken of the great flocking that there was to him for help in various cases: now this is written, that we may believe that he is the great Physician of souls, and may become his patients, and submit to his regimen; and here he tells us upon what terms we may be admitted; and he called all the people to him, to hear this, who modestly stood at some distance when he was in private conversation with his disciples. This is that which all are concerned to know, and consider, if they expect Christ should heal their souls.

1.They must not be indulgent of the ease of the body; for (Mar 8:34), "Whosoever will come after me for spiritual cures, as these people do for bodily cures, let him deny himself, and live a life of self-denial, mortification, and contempt of the world; let him not pretend to be his own physician, but renounce all confidence in himself and his own righteousness and strength, and let him take up his cross, conforming himself to the pattern of a crucified Jesus, and accommodating himself to the will of God in all the afflictions he lies under; and thus let him continue to follow me;" as many of those did, whom Christ healed. Those that will be Christ's patients must attend on him, converse with him, receive instruction and reproof from him, as those did that followed him, and must resolve they will never forsake him.

2.They must not be solicitous, no, not for the life of the body, when they cannot keep it without quitting Christ, Mar 8:35. Are we invited by the words and works of Christ to follow him? Let us sit down, and count the cost, whether we can prefer our advantages by Christ before life itself, whether we can bear to think of losing our life for Christ's sake and the gospel's. When the devil is drawing away disciples and servants after him, he conceals the worst of it, tells them only of the pleasure, but nothing of the peril, of his service; Ye shall not surely die; but what there is of trouble and danger in the service of Christ, he tells us of it before, tells us we shall suffer, perhaps we shall die, in the cause; and represents the discouragements not less, but greater, than commonly they prove, that it may appear he deals fairly with us, and is not afraid that we should know the worst; because the advantages of his service abundantly suffice to balance the discouragements, if we will but impartially set the one over against the other. In short,

(1.)We must not dread the loss of our lives, provided it be in the cause of Christ (Mar 8:35); Whosoever will save his life, by declining Christ, and refusing to come to him, or by disowning and denying him after he has in profession come to Christ, he shall lose it, shall lose the comfort of his natural life, the root and fountain of his spiritual life, and all his hopes of eternal life; such a bad bargain will he make for himself. But whosoever shall lose his life, shall be truly willing to lose it, shall venture it, shall lay it down when he cannot keep it without denying Christ, he shall save it, he shall be an unspeakable gainer; for the loss of his life shall be made up to him in a better life. It is looked upon to be some kind of recompence to those who lose their lives in the service of their prince and country, to have their memories honoured and their families provided for; but what is that to the recompence which Christ makes in eternal life to all that die for him?

(2.)We must dread the loss of our souls, yea, though we should gain the whole world by it (Mar 8:36, Mar 8:37); For what shall it profit a man, if he should gain the whole world, and all the wealth, honour, and pleasure, in it, by denying Christ, and lose his own soul? "True it is," said Bishop Hooper, the night before he suffered martyrdom, "that life is sweet, and death is bitter, but eternal death is more bitter, and eternal life is more sweet." As the happiness of heaven with Christ, is enough to countervail the loss of life itself for Christ, so the gain of all the world in sin, is not sufficient to countervail the ruin of the soul by sin.

What that is that men do, to save their lives, and gain the world, he tells us (Mar 8:38), and of what fatal consequence it will be to them; Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me, and of my words, in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed. Something like this we had, Mat 10:33. But it is here expressed more fully. Note, [1.] The disadvantage that the cause of Christ labours under this world, is, that it is to be owned and professed in an adulterous and sinful generation; such the generation of mankind is, gone a whoring from God, in the impure embraces of the world and the flesh, lying in wickedness; some ages, some places, are more especially adulterous and sinful, as that was in which Christ lived; in such a generation the cause of Christ is opposed and run down, and those that own it, are exposed to reproach and contempt, and every where ridiculed and spoken against. [2.] There are many, who, though they cannot but own that the cause of Christ is a righteous cause, are ashamed of it, because of the reproach that attends the professing of it; they are ashamed of their relation to Christ, and ashamed of the credit they cannot but give to his words; they cannot bear to be frowned upon and despised, and therefore throw off their profession, and go down the stream of a prevailing apostasy. [3.] There is a day coming, when the cause of Christ will appear as bright and illustrious as now it appears mean and contemptible; when the Son of man comes in the glory of his Father with his holy angels, as the true Shechinah, the brightness of his Father's glory, and the Lord of angels. [4.] Those that are ashamed of Christ in this world where he is despised, he will be ashamed of in that world where he is eternally adored. They shall not share with him in his glory then, that were not willing to share with him in his disgrace now.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Seven Centuries of Reception

6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

6 quotes · AD 407–1107
Post-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
40050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Pseudo-Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274SourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
And He says to him, If thou enter into the town, tell it not to any one, that is, relate continually to thy neighbours thy blindness, but never tell them of thy virtue.
AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. in Mat. 54) From the manner, however, itself of the question, He leads them to a higher feeling, and to higher thoughts, concerning Him, that they might not agree with the multitude. But the next words show what the head of the disciples, the mouth of the Apostles, answered; when all were asked, Peter answereth and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ.

(ubi sup.) Or else, that He might wait to fix the pure faith in their minds, till the Crucifixion, which was an offence to them, was over, for after it was once perfected, about the time of His ascension, He said unto the Apostles, Go ye and teach all nations.

(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc. v. Chrys. ubi sup.) The reason, however, why the Lord told them this, was to show, that after His cross and resurrection, Christ must be preached by His witnesses. Again, Peter alone, from the fervour of his disposition, had the boldness to dispute about these things. Wherefore it goes on, And Peter took him up, and began to rebuke hime.

But how is this, that Peter, gifted with a revelation from the Father, has so soon fallen, and become unstable? Surely, however, it was not wonderful that one who had received no revelation concerning the Passion should be ignorant of this. For that He was the Christ, the Son of the living God, he had learnt by revelation; but the mystery of His cross and resurrection had not yet been revealed to him. He Himself, however, showing that He must come to His Passion, rebuked Peter; wherefore there follows, And when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, &c.
AD 500Pseudo-Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) He asks the question with a purpose, for it was right that His disciples should praise Him better than the crowd.

(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) But He saith not to the devil, when tempting Him, Get thee behind me, but to Peter He saith, Get thee behind me, that is, follow Me, and resist not the design of My voluntary Passion. There follows, For thou savourest not the things which be of God, but which be of men.
AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(in Marc. 2, 35) Philip was that brother of Herod, of whom we spoke above, who in honour of Tiberius Cæsar called that town, which is now called Paneas, Cæsarea Philippi. It goes on, And by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do men say that I am?

(ubi sup.) Wherefore He first asks what is the opinion of men, in order to try the faith of the disciples, lest their confession should appear to be founded on the common opinion. It goes on, And they answered, saying, Some say John the Baptist, some Elias, and others, One of the prophets.

(ubi sup. Chrys. ubi sup.) This, however, he speaks with the feelings of a man who loves and desires; as if he said, This cannot be, neither can mine ears receive that the Son of God is to be slain.
AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceOn the Gospel of Mark
And Peter, taking him aside, began to rebuke him. Matthew explains more clearly how he rebuked him, saying: "And Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him, saying: 'God forbid, Lord, this shall never happen to you' (Matt. XVI). We have often said that Peter was of excessive fervor and had the greatest love for the Lord Savior. Therefore, after his confession in which he said, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God,' and the reward from the Savior where he heard according to Matthew: 'Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven' (Matt. XVI), he suddenly hears from the Lord that he must go to Jerusalem, and there suffer many things from the elders, scribes, and chief priests, and be killed, and on the third day rise again: he does not want to see his confession destroyed, nor does he think it possible that the Son of God could be killed; and he took him into his affection, or led him aside separately, so that he would not seem to argue with the teacher in the presence of the other disciples. And he began to rebuke him with the affection of love, and wishing to say: "God forbid, Lord," or (as it is better translated in Greek), "Be merciful to yourself, Lord, this shall not happen to you;" that is, it cannot happen, nor can my ears receive that the Son of God is to be killed.
AD 1107Theophylact of Ohridas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
After taking His disciples afar from the Jews, He then asks them concerning Himself, that they might speak the truth without fear of the Jews; wherefore it is said, And Jesus entered, and his disciples, into the towns of Cæsarea Philippi.

For many thought that John had risen from the dead, as even Herod believed, and that he had performed miracles after his resurrection. After however having enquired into the opinion of others, He asks them what was the belief of their own minds on this point; wherefore it continues, And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

He confesses indeed that He is the Christ announced by the Prophets; but the Evangelist Mark passes over what the Lord answered to his confession, and how He blessed him, lest by this way of relating it, he should seem to be favouring his master Peter; Matthew plainly goes through the whole of it.

For He wished in the mean time to hide His glory, lest many should be offended because of Him, and so earn a worse punishment.

But after the Lord had accepted the confession of the disciples, who called Him the true God, He then reveals to them the mystery of the Cross. Wherefore it goes on, And he began to teach them that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and of the chief priests, and the scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again; and he spake that saying openly, that is, concerning His future passion. But His disciples did not understand the order of the truth, neither could they comprehend His resurrection, but thought it better that He should not suffer.

For the Lord, wishing to show that His Passion was to take place on account of the salvation of men, and that Satan alone was unwilling that Christ should suffer, and the race of man be saved, called Peter Satan, because he savoured the things that were of Satan, and, from unwillingness that Christ should suffer, became His adversary; for Satan is interpreted 'the adversary.'

He says that Peter savours the things which be of men, in that he in some way savoured carnal affections, for Peter wished that Christ should spare Himself and not be crucified.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Mark 8:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8