TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 22:10–16. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
The holy things were to be eaten by the priests and their families. Now,
I.Here is a law that no stranger should eat of them, that is, no person whatsoever but the priests only, and those that pertained to them, Lev 22:10. The priests are charged with this care, not to profane the holy things by permitting the strangers to eat of them (Lev 22:15) or suffer them to bear the iniquity of trespass (Lev 22:16); that is, suffer them to bring guilt upon themselves, by meddling with that which they have no right to. Thus it is commonly understood. Note, We must not only be careful that we do not bear iniquity ourselves, but we must do what we can to prevent others bearing it. We must not only not suffer sin to lie upon our brother, but, if we can help it, we must not suffer it to come upon him. But perhaps there is another meaning of those words: the priests' eating the sin-offerings is said to signify their bearing the iniquity of the congregation, to make an atonement for them, Lev 10:17. Let not a stranger therefore eat of that holy thing particularly, and so pretend to bear the iniquity of trespass; for it is daring presumption for any to do that, but such as are appointed to do it. Those that set up other mediators besides Christ our priest, to bear the iniquity of trespass, sacrilegiously rob Christ of his honour, and invade his rights. When we warn people not to trust to their own righteousness, nor dare to appear before God in it, but to rely on Christ's righteousness only for peace and pardon, it is because we dare not suffer them to bear the iniquity of trespass, for we know it is too heavy for them.
II.Here is an explanation of the law, showing who were to be looked upon as belonging to the priest's family, and who not.
1.Sojourners and hired servants abode not in the house for ever; they were in the family, but not of it; and therefore they might not eat of the holy things (Lev 22:10): but the servant that was born in the house or bought with money, being a heirloom to the family, though a servant, yet might eat of the holy things, Lev 22:11. Note, Those only are entitled to the comforts of God's house who make it their rest for ever, and resolve to dwell in it all the days of their life. As for those who for a time only believe, to serve a present turn. They are looked upon but as sojourners and mercenaries, and have no part nor lot in the matter.
2.As to the children of the family, concerning the sons there could be no dispute, they were themselves priests, but concerning the daughters there was a distinction. While they continued in their father's house they might eat of the holy things; but, if they married such as were not priests, they lost their right (Lev 22:12), for now they were cut off from the family of the priests. Yet if a priest's daughter became a widow, and had no children in whom she might preserve a distinct family, and returned to her father's house again, being neither wife nor mother, she should again be looked upon as a daughter, and might eat of the holy things. If those whom Providence has made sorrowful widows, and who are dislodged from the rest they had in the house of a husband, yet find it again in a father's house, they have reason to be thankful to the widows' God, who does not leave them comfortless.
3.Here is a demand of restitution to be made by him that had no right to the holy things, and yet should eat of them unwittingly, Lev 22:14. If he did it presumptuously, and in contempt of the divine institution, he was liable to be cut off by the hand of God, and to be beaten by the magistrate; but, if he did it through weakness in inconsideration, he was to restore the value, adding a fifth part to it, besides which he was to bring an offering to atone for the trespass; see Lev 5:15, Lev 5:16.
III.This law might be dispensed with in a case of necessity, as it was when David and his men ate of the show-bread, Sa1 21:6.
And our Saviour justifies them, and gives a reason for it, which furnishes us with a lasting rule in all such cases, that God will have mercy and not sacrifice, Mat 12:3, Mat 12:4, Mat 12:7. Rituals must give way to morals.
IV.It is an instruction to gospel ministers, who are stewards of the mysteries of God, not to admit all, without distinction, to eat of the holy things, but to take out the precious from the vile. Those that are scandalously ignorant or profane are strangers and aliens to the family of the Lord's priests; and it is not meet to take the children's bread and to cast it to such. Holy things are for holy persons, for those who are holy, at least, in profession, Mat 7:6.
Continue studying Leviticus 22:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Leviticus 22:13 presents a specific, compassionate exception within the stringent regulations governing who may partake of the holy food offerings designated for the Israelite priesthood. It stipulates that a priest's daughter, if widowed or divorced and without children, may return to her father's household and resume eating from the consecrated provisions, a privilege she would have forfeited upon marrying a non-priest. This verse meticulously balances God's demand for the sanctity and exclusivity of holy offerings with His profound care for the vulnerable members of the priestly family, ensuring their sustenance and re-integration into their birth family's support system.
Context
Literary Context
Leviticus 22:13 is intricately woven into a broader legislative section (Leviticus 21-22) that meticulously delineates the laws governing the holiness and conduct of the Aaronic priesthood and their families. Chapter 21 focuses on the personal purity of the priests themselves, including restrictions on marriage and contact with the dead, ensuring their ritual fitness for service. Chapter 22 then transitions to the purity of the offerings and, crucially, who is permitted to consume them. Verses 1-9 establish the foundational principle that only ritually clean priests may handle or eat holy offerings. Verses 10-16 further specify who within the priestly household—including purchased slaves, as noted in Leviticus 22:11—may partake, explicitly excluding "strangers" (non-priestly family members or temporary residents). Verse 13, therefore, functions as a precise and compassionate clarification or exception to this general rule of exclusion, demonstrating a divine provision for a vulnerable family member who has returned to the fold, re-establishing her connection to the priestly household's sacred sustenance.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, the priesthood was a hereditary office, divinely appointed to mediate between God and the people through sacrifices and the maintenance of the sanctuary's purity. As a vital aspect of their sustenance and in recognition of their sacred service, God ordained that priests and their households should eat portions of the various offerings brought by the Israelites, as detailed in passages like Numbers 18:8-19. These offerings were considered "most holy" or "holy" and were thus subject to strict regulations regarding their consumption to preserve their sanctity. Women in ancient Israel, while highly valued, typically derived their social and economic status from their male relatives—father, husband, or son. A widow or a divorced woman, particularly one without children, was in an exceedingly vulnerable position, often lacking financial support and social protection. This law, therefore, profoundly reflects God's compassionate concern for such individuals, allowing a priest's daughter in this precarious state to return to her father's house and be sustained by the holy provisions, effectively re-integrating her into the economic and social safety net of her birth family. This provision underscores the communal responsibility within the family unit, especially for those in distress, while simultaneously upholding the sanctity of the consecrated food.
Key Themes
This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes within Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it reinforces the theme of Holiness and Separation, emphasizing the strict distinction between the sacred and the common, and the necessity of ritual purity for those who interact with God's holy things. The "stranger" (non-priestly individual) is explicitly forbidden, highlighting the unique status of the priesthood and the consecrated offerings. Secondly, it powerfully illustrates God's Compassion and Provision for the Vulnerable. Despite the rigid rules of holiness, God makes a specific provision for a priest's daughter who, through no fault of her own, finds herself in a precarious social and economic position. This aligns with broader biblical themes of caring for the widow and the fatherless, as seen in Deuteronomy 10:18. Thirdly, the verse underscores the importance of Family and Household Identity in ancient Israelite society. A woman's identity and rights were often tied to her male head of household. Her return "as in her youth" signifies a re-establishment of her identity and dependency within her father's priestly household, allowing her to regain access to its privileges. This reflects the communal nature of Israelite life and the familial structures ordained by God.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
The Hebrew word ʼâb (אָב), appearing twice in this verse, is a fundamental term referring to a male parent, but also extending to a progenitor, chief, or founder. In this context, it signifies the priest's role as the head of his household and the source of identity and provision for his family. The daughter's return "unto her father's house" and eating "of her father's meat" emphasizes her re-integration into his patriarchal care and the economic structure of his priestly family.
The Hebrew word nâʻûwr (נָעוּר), often translated as "youth" or "childhood," refers to the state of being young or the period of juvenility. The phrase "as in her youth" (כִּנְעוּרֶיהָ) is crucial. It signifies her return to her father's household in a status akin to her unmarried state before she left to form her own family. This implies that she is no longer bound by marital ties that would have separated her from her priestly family's direct household and its associated privileges. Her return "as in her youth" means she is once again fully dependent on and integrated into her father's household, thus regaining the right to partake of its provisions.
The Hebrew word zûwr (זוּר) denotes someone who is "foreign," "alien," or "unauthorized." In the context of priestly regulations, a zûwr is anyone who is not a priest or a member of the priest's immediate household (as defined by the law) and is therefore not permitted to partake of the holy things. This term underscores the strict boundaries of ritual purity and the exclusivity of access to consecrated items, ensuring that only those designated by God could consume what was set apart for Him.
Verse Breakdown
"But if the priest's daughter be a widow, or divorced, and have no child"
This clause precisely defines the specific, vulnerable conditions under which the exception applies. It identifies a priest's daughter who has experienced the loss of her marital status—either through the death of her husband (widowed) or the dissolution of her marriage (divorced). Crucially, the addition "and have no child" is significant, as children would typically provide support and establish her new household, preventing her full re-integration into her father's priestly family unit. This highlights her complete lack of independent support.
"and is returned unto her father's house, as in her youth"
This specifies the necessary action and the re-assumed status. She must physically return to live permanently in her father's household, signifying her renewed dependency and integration. The phrase "as in her youth" indicates that she is returning without any new familial attachments or responsibilities that would prevent her from being considered a full, dependent member of her father's immediate household, just as she was before marriage.
"she shall eat of her father's meat"
This is the compassionate provision granted. Once she meets the specified conditions and returns to her father's household, she is permitted to eat from the holy food offerings and tithes that sustain the priestly family. This ensures her sustenance and welfare, acknowledging her re-integration into the household's economy and ritual privileges, which were tied to her father's priestly status.
"but there shall no stranger eat thereof."
This concluding phrase serves as a vital reiteration and safeguard, reinforcing the fundamental principle of the holiness of the offerings. Even with this compassionate exception, the strict boundaries remain paramount. It explicitly re-emphasizes that only those genuinely part of the priestly household (including the re-integrated daughter under these specific conditions) may partake. Anyone outside this defined circle, a "stranger" or unauthorized person, remains strictly forbidden, thus protecting the sanctity and exclusivity of God's provisions.
Literary Devices
Leviticus 22:13 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its message with precision and depth. The primary device is Casuistic Law, presenting a specific "if... then..." scenario ("If the priest's daughter... then she shall eat..."). This legal style is characteristic of much of the Mosaic Law, providing concrete cases to illustrate broader principles of divine justice and order. Another key device is Legal Exception, where a general rule (a priest's daughter marrying out loses the right to eat holy food) is immediately followed by a carefully defined circumstance that allows for deviation. This highlights the nuanced and just nature of God's law, balancing strict adherence to holiness with compassionate provision for the vulnerable. There is also a clear Contrast established between the "priest's daughter" who is permitted to eat under specific conditions and the "stranger" who is explicitly forbidden. This contrast powerfully reinforces the boundaries of holiness and the unique, divinely appointed status of the priestly line. Furthermore, the phrase "as in her youth" functions as a form of Simile or Analogy, drawing a parallel between her current returned state and her prior unmarried status. This analogy justifies her re-inclusion based on her renewed dependency on her father's household, emphasizing a return to a former, privileged status within the family unit.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Leviticus 22:13 beautifully illustrates God's intricate balance between His absolute demand for holiness and His profound compassion for the vulnerable. The meticulous rules surrounding the consumption of holy food underscore the absolute sanctity of what is set apart for God, teaching reverence and the critical importance of distinction between the sacred and the common. Yet, within this strict framework, God's law makes a specific and tender provision for a priest's daughter in a state of destitution (widowed or divorced with no children), demonstrating His unwavering care for the marginalized and His commitment to the welfare of His people, even within the most sacred regulations. This highlights a timeless theological principle: divine justice is never devoid of mercy, and true holiness, as revealed by God, inherently includes compassion for the needy. It teaches that God's laws are not merely rigid dictates but expressions of His righteous and loving character, always attentive to the well-being of His covenant community.
Reflection and Application
While the specific regulations of Leviticus 22:13 concerning priestly food are part of the Old Covenant and are not directly applicable to New Testament believers in a literal sense, the underlying principles resonate deeply with Christian faith and practice. This passage calls us to reflect on the nature of God's provision, His compassionate heart for the vulnerable, and the profound importance of maintaining the sanctity of what is holy. It challenges us to consider how our communities and families care for those in difficult circumstances—widows, the divorced, the childless, or anyone facing hardship. Are we quick to extend compassion and practical support, providing a "home" and "sustenance" for those who are vulnerable, thereby reflecting God's own character? Furthermore, the emphasis on the "stranger" not eating reminds us of the sacredness of God's presence and His gifts. For believers, this translates into a reverent approach to spiritual disciplines, the fellowship of the church (as God's household), and the resources consecrated to His service. We are called to be good stewards of all that God has entrusted to us, recognizing its holy purpose and treating it with due respect, understanding that our access to God's spiritual provisions is a sacred privilege, not a common right.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Does this Old Testament law apply to Christians today?
While the specific ritual laws concerning the Israelite priesthood and their holy food offerings are part of the Old Covenant and are not literally binding on New Testament believers, the underlying theological and ethical principles remain profoundly relevant. Christians are not under the Mosaic Law in the same way ancient Israel was (see Romans 10:4), but the moral and spiritual truths embedded in these laws are timeless. This verse teaches us about God's compassionate heart for the vulnerable, the importance of family support, and the reverence due to what is set apart for God. We are called to live out these principles in new covenant ways, demonstrating care for the needy within the body of Christ and treating all that God has given us with holiness and respect.
What is the significance of the phrase "as in her youth"?
The phrase "as in her youth" (KJV) or "as when she was young" (NIV) is crucial because it defines the status under which the priest's daughter can return and partake of the holy food. It signifies her return to her father's household in a state of dependency and integration akin to her unmarried state. Before marriage, she was fully part of her father's household and enjoyed its privileges. Upon marriage to a non-priest, she became part of her husband's household and lost the right to eat holy food. If she became a widow or was divorced and had no children, she was left without a household to provide for her. By returning "as in her youth," she re-enters her father's direct care and provision, effectively becoming a full, dependent member of the priestly household once more, thus regaining the right to partake of its consecrated food. This highlights the importance of family structure and support in ancient Israel, where a woman's social and economic standing was tied to her male head of household.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Leviticus 22:13, with its meticulous regulations for priestly provision and its compassionate exception for the vulnerable, finds its ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The "holy food" that sustained the Old Testament priesthood foreshadows the spiritual sustenance found in Christ, who declared Himself the Bread of Life, offering eternal nourishment to all who believe. The strict exclusivity of the Old Covenant, where only the ritually pure priestly household could partake, points to the perfect holiness required to approach God, a holiness that only Christ possesses and graciously imputes to His followers. Through His once-for-all sacrifice, Jesus, our Great High Priest, has opened a new and living way for all believers—Jew and Gentile, once "strangers" to the covenants of promise—to be brought into God's household and partake of His spiritual provisions (Ephesians 2:19-20). The compassion shown to the vulnerable daughter in Leviticus prefigures Christ's radical inclusion and care for the marginalized, the outcast, and those without status, welcoming them into His family through grace (Luke 14:13-14). In Christ, we are all made "priests" in a spiritual sense (1 Peter 2:9), invited to feast at His table, not based on our lineage or ritual purity, but on His perfect sacrifice and our faith in Him. He is the ultimate provision, the fulfillment of all holiness, and the compassionate redeemer who brings all who trust in Him into the abundance of God's eternal household.