Joshua 17:12

KJV

Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out [the inhabitants of] those cities; but the Canaanites would dwell in that land.

KJV (with Strong's)

Yet the children {H1121} of Manasseh {H4519} could {H3201} not drive out {H3423} the inhabitants of those cities {H5892}; but the Canaanites {H3669} would {H2974} dwell {H3427} in that land {H776}.

Complete Jewish Bible

But the descendants of M'nasheh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities; the Kena'ani wanted to stay in that land.

Berean Standard Bible

But the descendants of Manasseh were unable to occupy these cities, because the Canaanites were determined to stay in this land.

American Standard Version

Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities; but the Canaanites would dwell in that land.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
Joshua 17:12 records a pivotal failure of the half-tribe of Manasseh to fully dispossess the indigenous Canaanite inhabitants from their divinely allotted territory. This act of incomplete obedience, despite God's clear commands and promised victory, allowed the Canaanites to remain in strategically important cities. This compromise set a dangerous precedent, foreshadowing the cycles of spiritual decline, idolatry, and national oppression that would profoundly shape the subsequent history of Israel, as vividly detailed in the book of Judges.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** Joshua 17:12 is situated within the detailed account of the division of the land among the Israelite tribes, following the initial military campaigns of conquest. Chapters 13-19 meticulously delineate each tribe's inheritance, and specifically, chapter 17 focuses on the allocation for the descendants of Joseph, Ephraim and Manasseh. This verse immediately follows a description of the strategic cities that fell within Manasseh's territory (Joshua 17:11), emphasizing their fertile plains and vital importance. The failure documented here stands in stark contrast to the earlier, decisive victories achieved through God's power (e.g., the fall of Jericho in [Joshua 6](/joshua/6 "Joshua 6 - The Fall of Jericho")) and God's faithfulness in delivering the land. It serves as a critical turning point, anticipating the struggles and repeated failures to dispossess the inhabitants that are extensively recounted in [the book of Judges](/judges/1 "Judges 1 - Incomplete Conquests"). This verse thus introduces a somber theme, indicating that while the land was sovereignly *given* by God, its complete *possession* required sustained and unwavering obedience from Israel.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** The Canaanites were a diverse collection of city-states, each typically governed by its own king and possessing distinct military and religious practices. Their religious systems were predominantly fertility cults centered around deities such as Baal and Asherah, often involving abhorrent practices like ritual prostitution and child sacrifice. God's explicit command to Israel, known as *herem* (utter destruction or devotion to God), was not merely a territorial imperative but a spiritual one, designed to preserve the purity and distinct identity of His covenant people. Allowing the Canaanites to remain meant exposing Israel to their idolatrous worship and moral corruption, which God knew would inevitably become a snare. Furthermore, the cities mentioned in Manasseh's territory (Beth Shean, Ibleam, Dor, En Dor, Taanach, Megiddo) were strategically crucial, controlling vital trade routes and highly fertile agricultural plains. The Canaanites in these regions possessed superior military technology, including formidable iron chariots (as highlighted in [Joshua 17:16](/joshua/17-16 "Joshua 17:16 - Manasseh's Complaint About Iron Chariots")), which likely contributed to Manasseh's perceived inability or reluctance to fully dislodge them.
* **Key Themes:** Joshua 17:12 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Joshua and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the theme of **Incomplete Obedience** or **Partial Obedience**. Despite God's clear and repeated commands (e.g., [Deuteronomy 7:2](/deuteronomy/7-2 "Deuteronomy 7:2 - Command to Destroy Nations") and [Numbers 33:55](/numbers/33-55 "Numbers 33:55 - Consequences of Not Dispossessing")) and the miraculous victories already granted, Manasseh failed to fully execute the divine mandate. This highlights a crucial distinction: God's faithfulness in giving the land did not negate Israel's responsibility in possessing it. Secondly, the verse introduces the theme of the **Consequences of Compromise**. By allowing the Canaanites to remain, Manasseh sowed seeds of future trouble, leading directly to intermarriage, idolatry, and oppression, as vividly portrayed throughout [the book of Judges](/judges/1 "The Book of Judges - Cycles of Disobedience and Deliverance"). This failure serves as a stark warning against spiritual complacency and the inherent dangers of tolerating sin or worldly influences within God's people. Finally, it implicitly touches on the theme of **Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility**, demonstrating that while God's promises are absolutely sure, their full realization in human experience often depends on human faithfulness and active participation.

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

#### Key Word Analysis
* **drive out (Hebrew, _yârash'_):** (H3423) This primitive root means "to occupy (by driving out previous tenants, and possessing in their place); by implication, to seize, to rob, to inherit; also to expel, to impoverish, to ruin." In the context of "could not drive out," the accompanying Hebrew word for "could" (H3201, _yâkôl_) implies an ability or power. Therefore, "could not drive out" (Hebrew, _lo' yâkôl l'hōrîsh_) suggests that Manasseh either lacked the perceived strength or, more profoundly, the will and faith to fully dispossess the inhabitants. Given God's repeated promises of victory and empowerment (e.g., [Joshua 1:5](/joshua/1-5 "Joshua 1:5 - God's Promise to Joshua")), this "could not" is often interpreted as a "would not," indicating a failure of resolve, perhaps due to fear of the Canaanites' iron chariots or a preference for coexistence.
* **Canaanites (Hebrew, _Kᵉnaʻanîy'_):** (H3669) This term refers to the pre-Israelite inhabitants of the land of Canaan. As a patrial from _Kenaʻan_, it denotes a specific people group known for their polytheistic worship, particularly of Baal and Asherah, and their morally corrupt practices, including child sacrifice and cultic prostitution. Their continued presence within Israel's territory was a direct threat to Israel's covenant fidelity and spiritual distinctiveness, as they would inevitably lead Israel into idolatry and syncretism, undermining the very purpose of Israel's existence as a holy nation set apart for Yahweh.
* **dwell (Hebrew, _yâshab'_):** (H3427) This primitive root means "properly, to sit down (specifically as judge, in ambush, in quiet); by implication, to dwell, to remain; causatively, to settle, to marry." Its use here signifies that the Canaanites did not merely linger or pass through; they established a permanent, settled presence within Manasseh's allotted territory. This implies a degree of cohabitation and integration, which was precisely what God had forbidden. This continued "dwelling" was not a temporary inconvenience but a deep-seated problem that would inevitably lead to the assimilation of Israelite culture and religion with Canaanite practices, as seen in the subsequent history of Israel.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"Yet the children of Manasseh":** This opening clause specifically identifies the tribe responsible for the ensuing failure. The adversative "Yet" (וְלֹא, _wəlo'_) immediately signals a deviation from the expected outcome, contrasting with God's earlier faithfulness in granting victory and the general success of the conquest. It sets a tone of disappointment and highlights a critical lapse in the execution of the divine plan.
* **"could not drive out [the inhabitants of] those cities":** This is the core statement of Manasseh's failure. "Those cities" refers back to the list in [Joshua 17:11](/joshua/17-11 "Joshua 17:11 - Cities of Manasseh's Territory") (Beth Shean, Ibleam, Dor, En Dor, Taanach, and Megiddo), which were strategically vital and economically significant strongholds. The phrase "could not drive out" implies either a perceived lack of military capability (perhaps due to the Canaanites' iron chariots, as mentioned in [Joshua 17:16](/joshua/17-16 "Joshua 17:16 - Manasseh's Complaint About Iron Chariots")) or, more likely in a theological context, a lack of faith and determination to fully obey God's command, despite His promised assistance.
* **"but the Canaanites would dwell in that land":** This final clause states the direct and enduring consequence of Manasseh's failure. The Canaanites did not merely remain; they "would dwell," indicating a settled, ongoing, and permanent presence within the land allocated to Manasseh. This establishes a long-term problem, as these remaining pockets of Canaanite influence became persistent sources of temptation, idolatry, and conflict for Israel, ultimately leading to the cycles of apostasy and oppression vividly described in [the book of Judges](/judges/1 "The Book of Judges - Cycles of Disobedience and Deliverance").

#### Literary Devices
Joshua 17:12 employs several potent literary devices to convey its significant message. There is a profound sense of **Irony** present, as God had explicitly promised to drive out the inhabitants before Israel (e.g., [Joshua 3:10](/joshua/3-10 "Joshua 3:10 - God Will Drive Out the Canaanites")), yet here, a specific tribe "could not" or "would not" fulfill their part of the divine mandate. This highlights a stark **Contrast** between God's omnipotence and unwavering faithfulness, and human weakness, fear, or disobedience. Furthermore, the verse functions as powerful **Foreshadowing**. It is a direct precursor to the narrative of [the book of Judges](/judges/1 "Judges 1 - Incomplete Conquests"), which opens with a similar litany of tribal failures to dispossess the Canaanites. This verse thus serves as an early and ominous warning sign of the spiritual decline, moral compromise, and national struggles that would plague Israel for centuries, demonstrating how initial compromises and partial obedience inevitably lead to deeper entanglements and widespread spiritual and social decay.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Joshua 17:12 stands as a profound theological statement on the nature of obedience and its far-reaching consequences. It underscores that God's covenant promises, while sovereignly given, are often conditional upon human faithfulness, particularly in the realm of spiritual purity and separation from pagan influences. The failure of Manasseh was not merely a military setback but a deeply spiritual compromise that allowed the "leaven" of paganism and idolatry to remain within the promised land, thereby threatening the very identity and mission of God's chosen people. This incomplete conquest serves as a stark reminder that true spiritual victory requires total commitment and an uncompromising refusal to tolerate anything that competes with God's exclusive claim on our lives and His commands. It highlights the ongoing spiritual battle against sin and worldly influences, emphasizing that partial obedience is, in essence, disobedience, and its toleration inevitably leads to greater spiritual bondage, compromise, and a departure from God's intended flourishing.

* [Numbers 33:55](/numbers/33-55 "Numbers 33:55 - Consequences of Not Driving Out Inhabitants")
* [Judges 1:27-28](/judges/1-27-28 "Judges 1:27-28 - Manasseh's Failure in Judges")
* [Psalm 106:34-36](/psalms/106-34-36 "Psalm 106:34-36 - Israel's Failure to Destroy Nations")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Joshua 17:12 serves as a timeless warning for believers today against the insidious dangers of partial obedience and spiritual compromise. Just as the remaining Canaanites became a persistent snare for Israel, allowing "pockets" of unaddressed sin, unmortified flesh, or worldly influences to remain in our lives will inevitably hinder our spiritual growth, compromise our witness, and lead to greater struggles. This verse challenges us to diligently examine our own "territories"—our hearts, minds, habits, relationships, and even our spheres of influence—and honestly ask if there are areas where we have failed to fully "drive out" what God commands us to surrender, eradicate, or separate from. True spiritual victory, and the abundant, flourishing life God intends for His children, requires radical, wholehearted obedience and a complete reliance on His empowering grace to overcome every obstacle. We are called not to coexist with sin or the world's values, but to actively put them to death, trusting that the same God who promised victory to Israel will empower us to live lives of holiness, freedom, and unreserved devotion to Him.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **What "Canaanites"—specific sins, ungodly habits, or worldly influences—might I be allowing to "dwell" in my life, rather than aggressively driving them out completely?**
* **Where might I be exhibiting "partial obedience" instead of full, unreserved surrender to God's revealed will?**
* **What are the potential long-term consequences of these compromises for my spiritual vitality, my relationship with God, and my impact on those around me?**
* **How can I lean more fully on God's power and the Holy Spirit's enablement to achieve complete spiritual victory in areas where I feel "unable" to overcome on my own?**

### FAQ

**Why was it so crucial for Israel to completely drive out the Canaanites?**

Answer: It was crucial for profound spiritual, theological, and covenantal reasons. God commanded the complete expulsion or destruction of the Canaanites (e.g., [Deuteronomy 7:1-6](/deuteronomy/7-1-6 "Deuteronomy 7:1-6 - Command to Destroy Nations")) primarily to prevent Israel from falling into idolatry and moral corruption. The Canaanites practiced abhorrent rituals, including child sacrifice, cultic prostitution, and divination, which were an abomination to the Lord. Their continued presence would inevitably lead to syncretism, where Israel would blend Yahweh worship with pagan practices, thereby defiling their covenant relationship with God and undermining their identity as a holy nation set apart for Him. The land itself was also considered holy, and its purification from the wickedness of its inhabitants was part of God's righteous judgment against their pervasive sin.

**Did "could not drive out" mean Manasseh was genuinely unable, or unwilling?**

Answer: While the KJV translates it as "could not," the Hebrew phrase *lo' horish* (לֹא הוֹרִישׁ), particularly when considering the root for "could" (H3201, _yâkôl_), carries a strong nuance that suggests a lack of resolve, determination, or faith rather than an inherent physical inability. God had repeatedly promised to give Israel victory and to drive out the inhabitants before them (e.g., [Joshua 1:5](/joshua/1-5 "Joshua 1:5 - God's Promise to Joshua"), [Joshua 23:5](/joshua/23-5 "Joshua 23:5 - God Will Drive Out Your Enemies")). Manasseh even complained about the Canaanites' iron chariots (see [Joshua 17:16](/joshua/17-16 "Joshua 17:16 - Manasseh's Complaint About Iron Chariots")), implying a fear or unwillingness to confront a technologically superior foe, despite the overwhelming power of God on their side. Therefore, most biblical scholars interpret "could not" as reflecting a failure of faith and obedience, a "would not," especially given that other tribes (like Judah in [Judges 1:8](/judges/1-8 "Judges 1:8 - Judah's Victory Over Jerusalem")) were more successful in similar endeavors against formidable opponents.

**What were the long-term consequences of Manasseh's failure?**

Answer: The long-term consequences were severe, pervasive, and far-reaching, as vividly illustrated throughout [the book of Judges](/judges/1 "The Book of Judges - Cycles of Disobedience and Deliverance") and subsequent books of the Old Testament. The remaining Canaanites became "thorns in your sides and their gods will be a snare to you" ([Judges 2:3](/judges/2-3 "Judges 2:3 - Consequences of Not Driving Out")). This led to recurring cycles of apostasy, where Israel would abandon Yahweh to worship Baal and Asherah, followed by divine judgment in the form of oppression from surrounding nations, and then cries for deliverance, prompting God to raise up judges. This tragic pattern of disobedience, oppression, and partial repentance continued for centuries, demonstrating how initial compromises and partial obedience can lead to deep-seated spiritual problems, moral decay, and national instability, ultimately contributing to the eventual exile of both the northern and southern kingdoms.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Joshua 17:12, with its somber account of incomplete conquest and human failure, powerfully foreshadows the profound need for a greater, more complete deliverer than Joshua or any Israelite tribe could ever be. Israel's inability or unwillingness to fully dispossess the Canaanites reveals the inherent limitations of human effort and the persistent struggle against sin and spiritual compromise that plagues humanity. This incomplete victory in the Old Testament points forward to Jesus Christ, the true and ultimate conqueror. Unlike Manasseh, who "could not drive out" their enemies, Christ fully and completely disarms the spiritual powers of darkness. He decisively conquered sin on the cross, triumphing over principalities and powers ([Colossians 2:15](/colossians/2-15 "Colossians 2:15 - Christ's Triumph Over Spiritual Powers")), and through His glorious resurrection, He decisively defeated death itself ([1 Corinthians 15:54-57](/1_corinthians/15-54-57 "1 Corinthians 15:54-57 - Victory Over Death")). Where Israel failed to fully cleanse the physical land, Christ perfectly cleanses His people, enabling us to "drive out" the "Canaanites" of sin, worldly desires, and ungodly influences from our hearts through the indwelling power of the Holy Spirit ([Romans 8:13](/romans/8-13 "Romans 8:13 - Putting to Death the Deeds of the Body")). Our victory over sin and the world is not achieved by our own strength or will, but by abiding in Him and participating in His already accomplished, perfect conquest ([John 16:33](/john/16-33 "John 16:33 - Christ Has Overcome the World")). He is the one who fully delivers us from every spiritual enemy, establishing a kingdom of complete purity, righteousness, and lasting peace, a reality that Israel's partial conquest could only dimly anticipate.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Exodus 23:29

I will not drive them out from before thee in one year; lest the land become desolate, and the beast of the field multiply against thee.

Exodus 23:33

They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me: for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee.

Judges 1:27

Neither did Manasseh drive out [the inhabitants of] Bethshean and her towns, nor Taanach and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Ibleam and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns: but the Canaanites would dwell in that land.

Judges 1:28

And it came to pass, when Israel was strong, that they put the Canaanites to tribute, and did not utterly drive them out.

Joshua 16:10

And they drave not out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer: but the Canaanites dwell among the Ephraimites unto this day, and serve under tribute.

Numbers 33:52

Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places:

Numbers 33:56

Moreover it shall come to pass, [that] I shall do unto you, as I thought to do unto them.