What number verse is Joshua 16:9 in the Bible?

Joshua 16:9 is the 6,275th verse of the Bible. Counting straight through the King James canon — all 31,102 verses from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21 — Joshua 16:9 sits at position 6,275.

Translation

King James Version

And the separate cities for the children of Ephraim were among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh, all the cities with their villages.

Ask

KJV (with Strong's)

And the separate ^H3995 cities ^H5892 for the children ^H1121 of Ephraim ^H669 were among ^H8432 the inheritance ^H5159 of the children ^H1121 of Manasseh ^H4519, all the cities ^H5892 with their villages ^H2691.

Ask

Complete Jewish Bible

together with the cities set aside for the descendants of Efrayim inside the territory to be inherited by the descendants of M'nasheh, all the cities with their villages.

Ask

Berean Standard Bible

along with all the cities and villages set apart for the descendants of Ephraim within the inheritance of Manasseh.

Ask

American Standard Version

together with the cities which were set apart for the children of Ephraim in the midst of the inheritance of the children of Manasseh, all the cities with their villages.

Ask

World English Bible Messianic

together with the cities which were set apart for the children of Ephraim in the midst of the inheritance of the children of Manasseh, all the cities with their villages.

Ask

Geneva Bible (1599)

And the separate cities for the children of Ephraim were among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh: all the cities with their villages.

Ask

Young's Literal Translation

And the separate cities of the sons of Ephraim are in the midst of the inheritance of the sons of Manasseh, all the cities and their villages;

Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Joshua 16:9 provides a precise geographical detail within the tribal allocations, stipulating that certain cities designated for the tribe of Ephraim were situated as enclaves within the broader territory inherited by the children of Manasseh. This specific arrangement reveals the intricate and meticulous nature of the land division, underscoring both the close familial ties between these two descendants of Joseph and God's faithful, detailed fulfillment of His covenant promises to provide a comprehensive and clearly defined inheritance for each Israelite tribe.

CONTEXT

Literary Context: Joshua 16:9 is nestled within the larger narrative of land distribution in the book of Joshua, specifically within chapters 13-21, which meticulously detail the division of Canaan among the tribes of Israel. More precisely, chapters 16 and 17 are dedicated to outlining the inheritance of the "house of Joseph," comprising the half-tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh. While Joshua 16:1-8 delineates the primary territorial boundaries assigned to Ephraim, verse 9 serves as a crucial clarification. It specifies that a number of distinct Ephraimite cities, along with their surrounding villages, were located as enclaves within the larger territory allotted to Manasseh. This detail not only adds precision to Ephraim's portion but also acts as a narrative bridge to the subsequent description of Manasseh's inheritance in Joshua 17, highlighting the complex, sometimes overlapping, and divinely ordained nature of the tribal allotments.
Historical & Cultural Context: The period of land division followed the initial conquest of Canaan and preceded the establishment of the Israelite monarchy, a time when tribal identity, kinship, and the fulfillment of divine promises were central to the nation's self-understanding. The unique "double portion" granted to Joseph, through his sons Ephraim and Manasseh, was a direct fulfillment of Jacob's prophetic blessing in Genesis 48:5-6. Land inheritance was far more than an economic asset; it was foundational to an Israelite's identity, security, and participation in God's covenant with Abraham. The presence of "separate cities" for one tribe within another's territory reflects the practical realities of dividing a diverse landscape, which might have accounted for pre-existing Canaanite population centers, strategic locations, or the outcome of the sacred lot-casting process. Such an arrangement necessitated a degree of inter-tribal cooperation and peaceful coexistence, as distinct communities would share the same broader geographical region, emphasizing the unity of the twelve tribes as one people of God.
Key Themes: This verse, though geographically specific, contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Joshua and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Divine Provision and Faithfulness, demonstrating God's meticulous and unwavering commitment to fulfilling His promises to Israel, down to the precise allocation of every city and village. The detailed geographical descriptions throughout the book of Joshua serve as tangible evidence of God's covenant faithfulness. Secondly, it highlights Inter-tribal Relationships and Unity. The complex land division, with its overlapping areas and enclaves, implicitly underscored the necessity of cooperation, mutual respect, and a shared national identity among the tribes, particularly between the closely related Ephraim and Manasseh. This arrangement reinforced the idea that while each tribe had its distinct inheritance, they were all integral parts of one unified nation, Israel, under God's sovereign rule. Lastly, it reinforces the theme of Inheritance and Possession, emphasizing that the land was a divinely granted, permanent possession, foundational to Israel's identity and future as God's chosen people, a fulfillment of the promise made to Abraham in Genesis 12:7.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

Separate (Hebrew, mibdâlâh', H3995): Derived from the root meaning "to divide" or "to distinguish," this noun signifies "a separation" or "a separate place." In this context, it emphatically indicates that these cities, despite being geographically situated within Manasseh's territory, were clearly delineated and set apart as legally and administratively belonging to Ephraim. It implies a precise demarcation, underscoring the thoroughness and intentionality of the land allocation process, ensuring distinct ownership even in an unusual arrangement.
Cities (Hebrew, ʻîyr', H5892): This term refers to a "city" or "town," often implying a fortified or significant populated center. Its use here, in conjunction with "villages," highlights the comprehensive nature of the inheritance. It points to established urban centers that were being formally assigned, not merely uninhabited plots of land. The inclusion of "cities" emphasizes the strategic and economic value of these allocated areas, which were vital for the sustenance and organization of the tribal populations.
Inheritance (Hebrew, nachălâh', H5159): This noun denotes "something inherited," "a possession," or "an allotment," often carrying the strong connotation of a permanent, God-given right or legacy. Its application here reinforces the theological truth that the land was not merely a conquered territory but a divinely ordained, perpetual possession for the tribes, a tangible fulfillment of God's ancient covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants. It speaks to the secure and lasting nature of God's provision.

Verse Breakdown

"And the separate cities for the children of Ephraim": This opening clause introduces the specific subject of the verse: cities that were distinctly set apart and designated for the tribe of Ephraim. The term "separate" (mibdâlâh) emphasizes that these were not ambiguous or shared territories but clearly defined enclaves, reinforcing the precision and intentionality of the divine land distribution, even in complex arrangements.
"[were] among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh": This crucial phrase clarifies the unique geographical reality. These Ephraimite cities were not contiguous with Ephraim's main territorial block but were embedded within the larger land mass allotted to Manasseh. This arrangement likely resulted from the complexities of the lot-casting, existing Canaanite enclaves, or strategic considerations, and it underscores the close familial ties and shared destiny of the two Josephite tribes, necessitating a degree of inter-tribal understanding.
"all the cities with their villages": This concluding phrase emphasizes the comprehensive nature of this allocation. It was not merely a few isolated towns but a complete set of urban centers and their dependent rural settlements. This detail reinforces the meticulousness of the land division process, ensuring that every aspect of the territory, from major cities to minor hamlets, was accounted for in the tribal inheritance, providing a viable and sustainable portion for the Ephraimites.

Literary Devices

Joshua 16:9, like much of the land-division narrative, prominently employs Precision and Detail to convey the meticulous fulfillment of God's promise. The specific enumeration of "separate cities" and "all the cities with their villages" demonstrates the thoroughness of the divine provision and the administrative process undertaken by Joshua and Eleazar. The phrase "cities with their villages" also functions as a Merism, a literary device where two contrasting or complementary parts (cities representing urban centers, villages representing rural settlements) are used to represent the whole populated area. This emphasizes the completeness and comprehensiveness of the allocated inheritance, encompassing both developed and undeveloped lands. Furthermore, the very act of listing such specific geographical and administrative details serves as a form of Verisimilitude, lending an air of historical accuracy and factual grounding to the narrative, thereby reinforcing the reality and reliability of God's work in the lives of His people.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Joshua 16:9, though seemingly a dry geographical detail, carries profound theological weight, speaking to the very character of God. It highlights His meticulous faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises, demonstrating that His provision for His people is not vague or generalized but precise and comprehensive, extending even to the intricate allocation of specific cities and villages. This detail also illuminates the complex, yet divinely ordered, web of relationships within the nascent nation of Israel, particularly between the closely related tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh. The overlapping territories underscore the inherent necessity for inter-tribal cooperation and unity, even amidst distinct inheritances. This arrangement foreshadows the challenges and blessings of communal living under God's overarching plan, reminding us that while God gives distinct callings and portions to individuals and groups, His people are ultimately called to live in harmony within the larger body, recognizing their shared identity and purpose in Him.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly mundane details of land distribution in Joshua 16:9 offer profound insights for contemporary believers, revealing the character of God and His call on our lives. This verse serves as a powerful reminder of God's meticulous care and unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His promises, not merely in grand, sweeping gestures, but in the intricate, often overlooked details of our individual and communal lives. Just as God precisely allocated every city and village to His people, He orchestrates the specific circumstances, spiritual gifts, and relationships that form our own unique "inheritance" in Christ. This calls us to cultivate a deep trust in His sovereign plan, even when our paths or responsibilities seem to overlap with others, or when our "portion" appears unconventional or challenging. Furthermore, the intermingling of Ephraimite and Manassite cities within a shared territory powerfully points to the necessity of unity, interdependence, and cooperation within the body of Christ. We are called to live in harmony, respecting each other's distinct callings and gifts, while actively working together for the common good of God's kingdom, recognizing that our ultimate inheritance is shared in Christ, and our collective mission requires mutual support and love.

Questions for Reflection

How does God's meticulous care in the land distribution encourage your trust in His detailed provision for your own life and circumstances, even in seemingly small matters?
In what areas of your life or ministry are you called to cooperate with others, even when your "boundaries" or roles might seem to overlap or require shared responsibility?
What "inheritance" – whether spiritual gifts, relationships, opportunities, or specific callings – has God specifically given you, and how are you stewarding it for His glory and the good of His kingdom?

FAQ

Why were Ephraimite cities located within Manasseh's territory?

Answer: The biblical text does not explicitly state the precise reasons for this specific arrangement, but several factors likely contributed to this unique geographical distribution. Firstly, it was understood that the land was divided by lot, a process believed to be divinely guided (as seen in Proverbs 16:33). Therefore, this arrangement was ultimately part of God's sovereign plan. Secondly, it might reflect the practicalities of the conquest and the existence of pre-existing population centers; perhaps certain cities were already predominantly settled by Ephraimites or were strategic locations that naturally fell within the broader Manassite geographical region. Thirdly, it underscores the close kinship between Ephraim and Manasseh, both being sons of Joseph, suggesting a degree of flexibility and shared identity between the two half-tribes that allowed for such an intermingling. This arrangement was not entirely unique in Israel's history, as other tribes also had enclaves or shared borders, highlighting the complex and organic nature of the land division rather than a perfectly geometric one.

Does this arrangement imply potential conflict or cooperation between the tribes?

Answer: While any overlapping territories could theoretically lead to friction, the biblical text presents this arrangement as an established and divinely ordained part of the land division, not necessarily as a source of immediate conflict. Given the close kinship between Ephraim and Manasseh, it most likely implied a necessity for cooperation and peaceful coexistence. The detailed nature of the allocation, specifying "separate cities" for Ephraim, suggests a clear understanding of ownership and boundaries, even for enclaves. The broader narrative of Joshua emphasizes the unity of Israel in possessing the land, and such arrangements would have required ongoing communication, mutual respect, and adherence to the terms of the division to maintain peace and order within the larger confederation of tribes. It serves as a reminder that even within distinct "inheritances" and roles, God's people are called to live in harmony and mutual support for the common good.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The meticulous land inheritance in Joshua 16:9, with its specific allocations and even overlapping territories for the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, serves as a powerful type and shadow pointing to the far greater spiritual inheritance secured for believers in Jesus Christ. While the Israelites received a physical land, our ultimate "promised land" is not geographical but spiritual, found in our union with Christ. He is the true and perfect fulfillment of God's promise, the one who grants us access to "every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ" (Ephesians 1:3). Just as Ephraim received a precise, divinely appointed portion, believers receive a spiritual inheritance that is "imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you" (1 Peter 1:4). Christ, as our great High Priest and the ultimate Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), has secured this inheritance through His atoning sacrifice, making us co-heirs with Him (Romans 8:17). The intermingling of tribal territories in Joshua foreshadows the profound unity and diversity of the Church, where diverse individuals from every tribe, nation, and background are brought together into one body in Christ (Galatians 3:28), sharing a common spiritual inheritance and called to live in harmonious fellowship under His headship, reflecting the multifaceted glory of God's kingdom.

Copy as

Commentary on Joshua 16 verses 5–10

5 ¶ And the border of the children of Ephraim according to their families was thus: even the border of their inheritance on the east side was Atarothaddar, unto Bethhoron the upper;

6 And the border went out toward the sea to Michmethah on the north side; and the border went about eastward unto Taanathshiloh, and passed by it on the east to Janohah;

7 And it went down from Janohah to Ataroth, and to Naarath, and came to Jericho, and went out at Jordan.

8 The border went out from Tappuah westward unto the river Kanah; and the goings out thereof were at the sea. This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Ephraim by their families.

9 And the separate cities for the children of Ephraim were among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh, all the cities with their villages.

10 And they drave not out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer: but the Canaanites dwell among the Ephraimites unto this day, and serve under tribute.

Here, 1. The border of the lot of Ephraim is set down, by which it was divided on the south from Benjamin and Dan, who lay between it and Judah, and on the north from Manasseh; for east and west it reached from Jordan to the great sea. The learned, who aim to be exact in drawing the line according to the directions here, find themselves very much at a loss, the description being short and intricate. The report of those who in these latter ages have travelled those countries will not serve to clear the difficulties, so vastly unlike is it now to what it was then; not only cities have been so destroyed as that no mark nor footstep of them remains, but brooks are dried up, rivers alter their courses, and even the mountain falling cometh to nought, and the rock is removed out of his place, Job 14:18. Unless I could hope to solve the doubts that arise upon this draught of the border of Ephraim, it is to no purpose to mention them: no doubt it was then perfectly understood, so as that the first intention of recording it was effectually answered, which was to notify the ancient landmarks, which posterity must by no means remove. 2. Some separate cities are spoken of, that lay not within these borders, at least not if the line was drawn direct, but lay within the lot of Manasseh (Jos 16:9), which might better be read, and there were separate cities for the children of Ephraim among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh, because it proved that Manasseh could spare them, and Ephraim had need of them, and it might be hoped that no inconvenience would arise from this mixture of these two tribes together, who were both the sons of Joseph, and should love as brethren. And by this it appears that though, when the tribes were numbered in the plains of Moab, Manasseh had got the start of Ephraim in number, for Manasseh was then 52,000, and Ephraim but 32,000 (Num 26:34, Num 26:37), yet by the time they were well settled in Canaan the hands were crossed again, and the blessing of Moses was verified, Deu 33:17, They are the ten thousands of Ephraim and they are the thousands of Manasseh. Families and kingdoms are diminished and increased, increased and diminished again, as God pleases. 3. A brand is put upon the Ephraimites, that they did not drive out the Canaanites from Gezer (Jos 16:10), either through carelessness or cowardice, either for want of faith in the promise of God, that he would give them success if they would make a vigorous effort, or for want of zeal for the command of God, which obliged them utterly to drive out the Canaanites, and to make no peace with them. And, though they hoped to satisfy the law by putting them under tribute, yet (as Calvin thinks) this made the matter worse, for it shows that they spared them out of covetousness, that they might be profited by their labours, and by dealing with them for their tribute they were in danger of being infected with their idolatry; yet some think that, when they brought them under tribute, they obliged them to renounce their idols, and to observe the seven precepts of the sons of Noah; and I should think so, but that we find in the sequel of the story that the Israelites were so far from restraining idolatry in others that they soon fell into it themselves. Many famous places were within this lot of the tribe of Ephraim, though not mentioned here. In it were Ramah, Samuel's city (called in the New Testament Arimathea, of which Joseph was, that took care of our Saviour's burial), and Shiloh, where the tabernacle was first set up. Tirzah also, the royal city of Jeroboam and his successors, and Deborah's palm-tree, under which she judged Israel, were in this tribe. Samaria, built by Omri after the burning of the royal palace of Tirzah, was in this tribe, and was long the royal city of the kingdom of the ten tribes; not far from it were Shechem, and the mountains Ebal and Gerizim, and Sychar, near which was Jacob's well, where Christ talked with the woman of Samaria. We read much of Mount Ephraim in the story of the Judges, and of a city called Ephraim, it is probable in this tribe, to which Christ retired, Joh 11:54. The whole kingdom of the ten tribes is often, in the prophets, especially in Hosea, called Ephraim.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 5–10. Public domain.

Copy as

Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 16:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.