TRV
- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 23:10–19. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. The institution of the sabbatical year, Exo 23:10, Exo 23:11. Every seventh year the land was to rest; they must not plough nor sow it at the beginning of the year, and then they could not expect any great harvest at the end of the year: but what the earth did produce of itself should be eaten from hand to mouth, and not laid up. Now this was designed, 1. To show what a plentiful land that was into which God was bringing them - that so numerous a people could have rich maintenance out of the produce of so small a country, without foreign trade, and yet could spare the increase of every seventh year. 2. To remind them of their dependence upon God their great landlord, and their obligation to use the fruit of their land as he should direct. Thus he would try their obedience in a matter that nearly touched their interest. Afterwards we find that their disobedience to this command was a forfeiture of the promises, Ch2 36:21. 3. To teach them a confidence in the divine Providence, while they did their duty - that, as the sixth day's manna served for two day's meat, so the sixth year's increase should serve for two years' subsistence. Thus they must learn not to take thought for their life, Mat 6:25. If we are prudent and diligent in our affairs, we may trust Providence to furnish us with the bread of the day in its day.
II.The repetition of the law of the fourth commandment concerning the weekly sabbath, Exo 23:12.
Even in the year of rest they must not think that the sabbath day was laid in common with the other days, but, even that year, it must be religiously observed; yet thus some have endeavoured to take away the observance of the sabbath, by pretending that every day must be a sabbath day.
III.All manner of respect to the gods of the heathen is here strictly forbidden, Exo 23:13.
A general caution is prefixed to this, which has reference to all these precepts: In all things that I have said unto you, be circumspect. We are in danger of missing our way on the right hand and on the left, and it is at our peril if we do; therefore we have need to look about us. A man may ruin himself through mere carelessness, but he cannot save himself without great care and circumspection: particularly, since idolatry was a sin which they were much addicted to, and would be greatly tempted to, they must endeavour to blot out the remembrance of the gods of the heathen, and must disuse and forget all their superstitious forms of speech, and never mention them but with detestation. In Christian schools and academies (for it is in vain to think of reforming the play-houses), it were to be wished that the names and stories of the heathen deities, or demons rather, were not so commonly and familiarly used as they are, even with intimations of respect, and sometimes with forms of invocation. Surely we have not so learned Christ.
IV.Their solemn religious attendance on God in the place which he should choose is here strictly required, Exo 23:14-17.
1.Thrice a year all their males must come together in a holy convocation, that they might the better know and love one another, and keep up their communion as a dignified and peculiar people.
2.They must come together before the Lord (Exo 23:17) to present themselves before him, looking towards the place where his honour dwelt, and to pay their homage to him as their great Lord, from and under whom they held all their enjoyments.
3.They must feast together before the Lord, eating and drinking together, in token of their joy in God and their grateful sense of his goodness to them; for a feast is made for laughter, Ecc 10:19. O what a good Master do we serve, who has made it our duty to rejoice before him, who feasts his servants when they are in waiting! Never let religion be called a melancholy thing, when its solemn services are solemn feasts.
4.They must not appear before God empty, Exo 23:15. Some free-will offering or other they must bring, in token of their respect and gratitude to their great benefactor; and, as they were not allowed to come empty-handed, so we must not come to worship God empty-hearted; our souls must be filled with grace, with pious and devout affections, holy desires towards him, and dedications of ourselves to him, for with such sacrifices God is well-pleased.
5.The passover, pentecost, and feast of tabernacles, in spring, summer, and autumn, were the three times appointed for their attendance: not in winter, because travelling was then uncomfortable; not in the midst of their harvest, because then they were otherwise employed; so that they had no reason to say that he made them to serve with an offering, or wearied them with incense.
V.Some particular directions are here given about the three feasts, though not so fully as afterwards.
1.As to the passover, it was not to be offered with leavened bread, for at that feast all leaven was to be cast out, nor was the fat of it to remain until the morning, lest it should become offensive, Exo 23:18.
2.At the feast of pentecost, when they were to begin their harvest, they must bring the first of their first-fruits to God, by the pious presenting of which the whole harvest was sanctified, Exo 23:19.
3.At the feast of ingathering, as it is called (Exo 23:16), they must give God thanks for the harvest-mercies they had received, and must depend upon him for the next harvest, and must not think to receive benefit by that superstitious usage of some of the Gentiles, who, it is said, at the end of their harvest, seethed a kid in its dam's milk, and sprinkled that milk-pottage, in a magical way, upon their gardens and fields, to make them more fruitful next year. But Israel must abhor such foolish customs.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Our physical nature rebels against the thought of making the nourishment of the living a garnish for the dead or the cause of life an accessory to the death of the body.
Continue studying Exodus 23:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Exodus 23:19 serves as a concluding injunction within the Book of the Covenant, presenting two seemingly disparate yet deeply interconnected commands that delineate Israel's unique covenant relationship with Yahweh. It mandates the offering of the first and finest agricultural produce to the Lord, symbolizing profound gratitude, unwavering trust, and sacred consecration. Simultaneously, it prohibits the boiling of a young goat in its mother's milk, a command widely understood as a firm rejection of pagan fertility rites and a powerful affirmation of the sanctity of life, the natural order, and ethical distinction. Together, these laws call Israel to a life of devoted worship, ethical purity, and clear separation from the practices of surrounding nations.
Context
Literary Context
This verse provides the concluding statement of the "Book of the Covenant" Exodus 20:22-23:19, a foundational collection of laws given by God to Moses immediately following the Ten Commandments. This section meticulously elaborates on the foundational principles of the Decalogue, providing specific statutes concerning civil and criminal justice, social ethics, Sabbath observance, and religious festivals. The preceding verses in Exodus 23 detail regulations for justice, the treatment of enemies, the Sabbath year, and the three annual pilgrimage feasts—the Feast of Unleavened Bread, the Feast of Harvest (Weeks/Pentecost), and the Feast of Ingathering (Tabernacles). The command regarding firstfruits directly relates to these agricultural feasts, emphasizing the proper worship and acknowledgment of God's provision. The prohibition against seething a kid in its mother's milk acts as a final, striking injunction against pagan influence, underscoring Israel's complete separation and unique identity as God's chosen people.
Historical & Cultural Context
The giving of these laws occurred at Mount Sinai, a pivotal moment shortly after Israel's miraculous deliverance from Egyptian bondage. These statutes were designed to shape a newly formed nation, setting them apart from the idolatrous and often cruel practices of the surrounding Canaanite cultures. While the practice of offering firstfruits was common in the ancient Near East, Israel's offering was unique in its dedication solely to Yahweh, acknowledging Him as the ultimate provider and sovereign over all creation. The prohibition against boiling a kid in its mother's milk is particularly noteworthy. While seemingly unusual, it is widely interpreted by scholars as a direct counter-cultural command, likely targeting a specific Canaanite fertility ritual. Archaeological discoveries, such as the Ugaritic texts, suggest that some pagan rites involved boiling a young animal in milk to ensure agricultural prosperity. God explicitly forbade this practice for His people, a command notably repeated in Exodus 34:26 and Deuteronomy 14:21. This prohibition underscored Israel's call to ethical purity, compassion, and absolute distinction from the abominable practices of their neighbors, reinforcing their identity as a holy nation under God's covenant.
Key Themes
Exodus 23:19 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the Book of the Covenant and the broader Pentateuch. The command to offer "firstfruits" reinforces the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Provision, emphasizing God as the ultimate source of all blessing and the rightful recipient of Israel's worship and gratitude. This act cultivates Trust and Dependence upon God, as it requires giving the first portion before the full harvest is secured. The prohibition against "seething a kid in its mother's milk" powerfully advances the theme of Holiness and Separation, calling Israel to be distinct from the idolatrous and ethically corrupt practices of the surrounding nations. It also touches upon Compassion and Respect for Life, forbidding an act that violates natural bonds and potentially promotes cruelty. Together, these commands underscore the holistic nature of the covenant, demanding both proper worship and ethical living as expressions of Israel's unique relationship with their LORD God.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From the root bâkar, meaning "to be first-born" or "to bear first-fruits," this term refers to the initial produce of the crop, specifically the first ripe fruits or grains. In ancient Israel, the offering of bikkûwr was a significant act of worship, symbolizing gratitude and acknowledging God's ownership and provision over the land and its bounty. By dedicating the first portion, the entire subsequent harvest was consecrated, demonstrating trust in God's continued faithfulness and sovereignty.
A primitive root meaning "to boil up" or "to be done in cooking," this verb also figuratively means "to ripen." In the context of this verse, it refers to the act of cooking a young animal in a liquid. The specific prohibition highlights the unnatural and perhaps ritualistic nature of boiling a young animal in the very substance that nourished it from birth, pointing to a violation of natural order or a rejection of specific pagan practices.
This term specifically denotes a young goat, deriving from a root related to "browsing." The specificity of "kid" and "his mother's milk" emphasizes the close, life-sustaining bond between the offspring and its parent, making the act of boiling the young animal in its mother's milk particularly offensive in its violation of this natural relationship, especially given that the milk is described as its "mother's."
Verse Breakdown
"The first of the firstfruits of thy land thou shalt bring into the house of the LORD thy God."
This clause commands the Israelites to offer the initial and best portion of their agricultural produce to God. This was not merely a tax but a profound act of worship, expressing deep gratitude for God's provision, acknowledging His sovereignty over the land and its fertility, and demonstrating trust in His continued blessing. The "house of the LORD" refers to the Tabernacle, the central place of worship where God's presence dwelt among His people, signifying that these offerings were to be brought to the divinely appointed sanctuary.
"Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk."
This prohibition, seemingly distinct from the first command, is a powerful injunction against a specific practice. It is widely understood as a direct rejection of Canaanite fertility rites, which may have involved boiling a young animal in its mother's milk as a sympathetic magic ritual to ensure bountiful harvests. Beyond this specific context, it also conveys a broader principle of compassion, respect for the natural order, and the sanctity of life, forbidding an act that violates the life-giving bond between a mother and her offspring and is considered unnatural or cruel.
Literary Devices
Exodus 23:19 employs several literary devices to convey its profound message. Juxtaposition is prominently featured, placing two seemingly unrelated commands side-by-side: a positive command to offer the best to God and a negative command prohibiting a specific culinary or ritual practice. This juxtaposition subtly links the two, implying that true worship (expressed through the offering of firstfruits) necessitates a complete separation from ungodly practices (symbolized by the kid in milk). The command to bring "firstfruits" is a form of Synecdoche, where the part (the first portion) represents the whole (the entire harvest), symbolizing the consecration of all of Israel's produce and labor to God. The prohibition itself can be seen as a form of Symbolism, where the act of boiling a kid in its mother's milk symbolizes practices that are unnatural, cruel, or associated with idolatry, thus requiring Israel to be distinct and ethically pure. The starkness and seemingly unusual nature of the prohibition also create a sense of Emphasis, highlighting the absolute necessity of avoiding pagan contamination and maintaining a holy lifestyle that reflects God's character.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Exodus 23:19 encapsulates core theological principles for Israel and, by extension, for believers today. The command to bring firstfruits establishes the theme of God's absolute sovereignty and ownership over all creation, demanding that His people acknowledge Him as the source of all blessing by offering Him the best and first of their increase. This act of giving is an expression of worship, trust, and gratitude, consecrating not only the offering but the entire life and labor of the giver. The prohibition against boiling a kid in its mother's milk, while specific in its historical context, powerfully underscores the call to holiness, distinction from paganism, and compassion for creation. It speaks to the sanctity of life, the importance of respecting natural bonds, and the rejection of practices that are unnatural or cruel. Together, these commands call God's people to live a life wholly devoted to Him, marked by worship, ethical purity, and a clear separation from the world's corrupting influences.
Reflection and Application
Exodus 23:19, though ancient, offers profound and timeless principles for contemporary believers. The command to bring the "first of the firstfruits" challenges us to examine where God truly stands in our priorities. It's an invitation to give Him our "first and best" in every area of life—our time, talents, resources, and affections—not as a legalistic duty, but as an overflow of gratitude and trust. This act of giving is a powerful declaration that God is our ultimate provider and that we depend entirely on His grace, even before we see the full harvest of our efforts. It cultivates a spirit of generosity and faith, acknowledging His sovereignty over all we possess and demonstrating our reliance on Him. The seemingly unusual prohibition against "seething a kid in his mother's milk" calls us to a life of ethical discernment and compassionate living. It reminds us to be distinct from the world's values, rejecting practices that are unnatural, cruel, or contrary to God's character and the sanctity of life. It encourages us to cultivate a tender heart towards creation and to avoid any customs or mindsets that would violate God's established order or promote spiritual compromise. Ultimately, this verse calls us to a holistic discipleship where our worship is expressed not only in our offerings but also in our everyday ethical choices and our unwavering commitment to living a life set apart for God's glory.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is boiling a kid in its mother's milk specifically forbidden?
This prohibition is one of the most debated and intriguing commands in the Old Testament. While the text itself doesn't provide a direct explanation, the most widely accepted scholarly interpretation is that it was a direct counter-cultural command aimed at pagan fertility rites prevalent in the ancient Near East, particularly among the Canaanites. Archaeological evidence and ancient texts (like those from Ugarit) suggest that some pagan rituals involved boiling a young animal in its mother's milk as a sympathetic magic rite to ensure agricultural abundance and fertility. By explicitly forbidding this, God was commanding Israel to be utterly distinct from the idolatrous and often abhorrent practices of their neighbors, emphasizing their unique covenant relationship with Him. Beyond this, many also see in the command a broader principle of compassion and respect for the natural order, viewing the act as inherently unnatural and cruel, violating the life-giving bond between a mother and her offspring. This aligns with other Mosaic laws promoting humane treatment of animals and preserving life, such as the law concerning a bird's nest in Deuteronomy 22:6.
How does the concept of "firstfruits" apply to Christians today, since we don't offer agricultural produce in a temple?
While the literal act of bringing agricultural "firstfruits" to the Tabernacle or Temple is no longer practiced by Christians, the underlying spiritual principles remain profoundly relevant. The command to offer the first and best of one's produce symbolizes a deeper truth: that God is the ultimate owner and provider of everything we have. For Christians, "firstfruits" translates to honoring God with the "first and best" of our time, talents, and financial resources. This means prioritizing God in our schedules, dedicating our abilities to His service, and giving generously and proportionately from our income before other expenses. It's an act of worship, trust, and gratitude, acknowledging His sovereignty and demonstrating our faith in His continued provision. It cultivates a heart of generosity and reminds us that all blessings flow from Him, transforming our giving from a mere obligation into a joyful expression of devotion. This principle is echoed in the New Testament, where believers are encouraged to give cheerfully and generously (e.g., 2 Corinthians 9:7).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Exodus 23:19 finds its ultimate and profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The command to bring the "first of the firstfruits" points forward to Christ as the perfect and ultimate offering. He is the "firstfruits" of God's new creation, the first to rise from the dead, guaranteeing the resurrection of all who believe in Him, as powerfully declared in 1 Corinthians 15:20-23. His life, death, and resurrection represent the "first and best" offering, perfectly fulfilling all the sacrificial laws of the Old Covenant. He gave His very self, His perfect life, as the ultimate sacrifice for sin, making a way for humanity to be reconciled to God and establishing a new covenant through His blood Hebrews 9:11-14.
Furthermore, the prohibition against "seething a kid in his mother's milk" foreshadows Christ's call to a life of radical distinction and holiness. Just as Israel was to be set apart from the abominable practices of pagan cultures, so too are believers in Christ called to live a life distinct from the world's corrupting influences and unnatural ways. Jesus, through His life and teachings, exemplified a compassion and respect for life that far surpassed the Old Testament law, culminating in His own self-giving love. He established a new covenant where ethical purity and love for God and neighbor are written on the heart, not merely external commands Jeremiah 31:33. By His atoning work, Christ enables us to reject the "unnatural" ways of sin and the world, empowering us to live a life that honors God and reflects His character, truly set apart as His holy people, a "chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession" 1 Peter 2:9. In Him, we are transformed to offer ourselves as living sacrifices, our entire lives becoming a "firstfruits" offering of worship and obedience Romans 12:1.