Skip to content

Psalm 52:2

“The Wicked Boaster Condemned”Psalm 52:1–4

King James Version
Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs; like a sharp razor, working deceitfully.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Thy tongue H3956 deviseth H2803 mischiefs H1942; like a sharp H3913 razor H8593, working H6213 deceitfully H7423.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Your tongue devises destruction like a sharpened razor, O worker of deceit.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
Thy tongue deviseth very wickedness, Like a sharp razor, working deceitfully.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Your tongue plots destruction, like a sharp razor, working deceitfully.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Thy tongue imagineth mischiefe, and is like a sharpe rasor, that cutteth deceitfully.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
Mischiefs doth thy tongue devise, Like a sharp razor, working deceit.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
7 Hebrew words
  1. הַוּוֹתHa·Votdestruction[s]H1942N-fpNoun Plural Feminine Absolute
  2. תַּחְשֹׁבtach·Shoit plotsH2803V-Qal-Imperf-2msVerb Qal Imperfect 2nd Singular Masculine
  3. לְשׁוֹנֶךָle·sho·Ne·khayour tongueH3956N-csc ¦ 2msNoun Singular common gender Construct with suffixלְשׁוֹנֶtongueךָyour
  4. כְּתַעַרke·Ta·'arlike a razorH8593Prep-k ¦ N-csNoun Singular common gender Absoluteכְּlikeתַעַרa razor
  5. מְלֻטָּשׁme·lu·TashsharpenedH3913V-Pual-PassPrtcpl-msVerb Pual Participle Passive Singular Masculine Absolute
  6. עֹשֵׂה'o·SehO doer ofH6213V-Qal-Prtcpl-msVerb Qal Participle Singular Masculine Construct
  7. רְמִיָּהre·mi·YahdeceitH7423N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
In the KJVVerse 14,713 of 31,102 · 47.3%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

The boaster’s tongue plans ruin with care and cuts like a sharp razor, doing its harm through deceit and treachery.

“Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs;”

Châshab, to weave and so to plot, with havvâh, ruin. The harm is planned before it is spoken.

“like a sharp razor,”

A blade made for shaving, taʻar, turned to wounding. It cuts clean and deep.

“working deceitfully.”

Rᵉmîyâh, treachery. The harm is done under the cover of loyal service.

Passage studyPsalm 52:1–4

God’s Goodness Outlasts the Boaster’s Tongue

1To the chief Musician, Maschil, A Psalm of David, when Doeg the Edomite came and told Saul, and said unto him, David is come to the house of Ahimelech. Why boastest thou thyself in mischief, O mighty man? the goodness of God endureth continually. 2Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs; like a sharp razor, working deceitfully. 3Thou lovest evil more than good; and lying rather than to speak righteousness. Selah. 4Thou lovest all devouring words, O thou deceitful tongue.

Summary

Psalm 52 opens with David confronting a man who boasts of the harm he has done. Its title ties it to Doeg the Edomite, whose report to King Saul led to the slaughter of the priests of Nob. In four verses David asks why the “mighty man” boasts in mischief and sets beside that boast the goodness of God, which endures all day long. Then he lays bare the man’s tongue. It plots ruin like a sharp razor, it prefers lying to speaking righteousness, and it loves words that swallow people up. The harm the boaster does is real, and God’s goodness is still there when his boast is over.

Who Doeg was and what he did at Nob

The psalm’s title names its occasion: “when Doeg the Edomite came and told Saul, and said unto him, David is come to the house of Ahimelech.” The story is told in 1 Samuel 21–22. David, fleeing from Saul, came to Nob, where the priest Ahimelech gave him food and help, unaware that David was a fugitive from the king (1 Samuel 21:1–7). Doeg, a non-Israelite who was chief of Saul’s herdsmen, was there and saw it.

Later Saul, angry and suspicious, accused his own servants of siding with David. Doeg spoke up and told him of the visit to Nob, an act of betrayal that won him favour with the king. Saul ordered the priests put to death, and when his own guards refused to strike them, Doeg did it himself. He killed eighty-five priests and then struck their town, with its men, women and children (1 Samuel 22:9–19). It was a great wrong against innocent people and against the priests who served God, and it began with a few words spoken to a king.

So the “thou” of these verses is Doeg first of all, and everything David says about the tongue in verses 2 to 4 is said with that report in mind. The words also reach anyone who glories in harming others in the same way.

A Maschil for the chief Musician

The title calls the psalm “Maschil”, maskîyl, a word meaning instructive, or one who causes to understand. Several psalms carry it, and it marks this one as a teaching psalm. David is showing himself and his hearers how to think about great evil and where to stand when it strikes. “To the chief Musician” sets it for singing in Israel’s worship, so the lesson was meant to be sung by God’s people together.

Why does the mighty man boast in mischief?

David opens with a question that needs no answer, because its purpose is to condemn. He calls Doeg gibbôwr, “mighty man”, and the name is bitter irony. Doeg’s might showed itself in betrayal and slaughter, and the courage and righteousness that make a man truly mighty were missing from him.

The thing he boasts of is “mischief”, raʻ, the common Hebrew word for evil or badness, which can also mean harm and calamity. In this verse it covers both Doeg’s wicked deed and the ruin it brought on Ahimelech’s house and the town of Nob. The same word comes back as “evil” in verse 3, where David says that Doeg loves it. To boast of harm is the pride of a man who trusts in his own power to destroy, and later in the psalm this man trusts in his riches and makes himself strong in his wickedness (Psalm 52:7). Scripture gives the one right ground for boasting: whoever glories should glory in understanding and knowing the LORD (Jeremiah 9:24).

The goodness of God endureth continually

Against the boast David sets one line: “the goodness of God endureth continually.” The word for goodness is cheçed, one of the richest words in the Old Testament, which is also translated lovingkindness, mercy, steadfast love and covenant loyalty. It is God’s faithful, active love for his people, which he gives freely and keeps up. The Hebrew for “continually” is “all the day”. God’s steadfast love is there every hour of the day on which Doeg did his worst.

This line is the anchor of the whole psalm. The man boasts of a harm that will pass, and God’s goodness stays. The psalm returns to it at the end, where God brings the boaster down (Psalm 52:5–7) and the righteous trust in God’s steadfast love (Psalm 52:8–9), so the opening contrast of Psalm 52 runs all the way through it. Another psalm says the same of God, that his steadfast love lasts for ever (Psalm 100:5).

How can God’s goodness endure when evil wins for a time?

God’s goodness belongs to who he is, so it holds through every hour, whatever people do and however dark the day. The verse tells us that his steadfast love, his faithfulness and his kindness stay constant and that his justice and his redemption will prevail in the end. It makes no promise that believers will be spared suffering or that evil will lose every battle, for David wrote this line after the priests were already dead. Psalm 37 tells God’s people to “fret not” because of evildoers (Psalm 37:1–2), and Paul writes that God works all things together for good to those who love him (Romans 8:28). The victories of mischief are short, and God’s goodness lasts.

A tongue like a sharp razor

Verse 2 turns from the boast to the tongue that made it: “Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs; like a sharp razor, working deceitfully.” “Deviseth” is châshab, a verb whose root sense is to plait or weave, and so to fabricate, and figuratively to plot or contrive. The tongue is pictured as a craftsman at work, and the words it speaks were planned with care for a harmful end. The evil it does begins inside the man.

“Mischiefs” in this verse is a different Hebrew word from the “mischief” of verse 1, though the KJV uses the same English for both. It is havvâh, from a root that speaks of eagerly coveting and rushing upon something, and it means desire, and also ruin or calamity. A tongue that devises havvâh is aiming at someone’s ruin.

The razor, taʻar, was an everyday blade for shaving, a tool made for a good use and here turned to wounding. A sharp razor cuts clean and deep. Words aimed with care at a person’s weak places do the same, and the wounds they leave in a reputation, a friendship or a life are slow to heal.

“Working deceitfully” uses rᵉmîyâh, which means remissness, treachery, deceit or guile. The harm is done under cover. Doeg’s report looked like loyal service to the king, and it was treachery, and its victims learned what it was only when the damage was done. The KJV calls the tongue “deceitful” again in verse 4, where the Hebrew word is mirmâh, a different word with a related meaning.

Loving evil and lying

Verse 3 goes beneath the tongue to the heart: “Thou lovest evil more than good; and lying rather than to speak righteousness.” The evil is raʻ, the same word as the mischief of verse 1. The lying is sheqer, falsehood, a lie or deception. Righteousness is tsedeq, rightness, righteousness and justice, which covers conduct, judgment and speech alike, and here it is the speaking of what is right and true.

The verb is ʼâhab, the ordinary word “to love, to have affection for”, used of love for a person, an object or a practice. Doeg’s affection was set on evil and falsehood. The verse sets each pair side by side and says which one he chose, first in his whole way of life, evil over good, and then in his speech, lying over righteousness. Isaiah pronounces woe on those who call evil good (Isaiah 5:20), and Proverbs lists seven things the LORD hates, among them a lying tongue (Proverbs 6:16–19).

Does “lovest evil” mean a deliberate choice?

It means a willing choice that comes out of what the man loves. His heart is set on what is wicked and false, he finds satisfaction in it, and his deeds and words follow. That is why David speaks so sharply. Doeg’s report to Saul was the fruit of what he loved, and the verse lays that love bare.

Jesus said of the devil that “he was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it” (John 8:44). A man who loves lying and uses it to shed innocent blood bears that family likeness.

“Selah” closes the verse. It marks a pause, a break in the music for thought, and here it lets the weight of the charge settle before David says more.

Devouring words and a deceitful tongue

Verse 4 completes the charge: “Thou lovest all devouring words, O thou deceitful tongue.” The verb is ʼâhab again. “Devouring” is belaʻ, a gulp or swallowing, and figuratively destruction, and the related verb balaʻ means to swallow or gulp down. Devouring words swallow up a person’s name, his friendships and even his life, the way a beast swallows its prey. “All” takes in every word of that kind, and Doeg loved them all. A short report from him consumed a whole town of priests and their families.

Then David speaks to the tongue itself, “O thou deceitful tongue”, using mirmâh, which means fraud, craft, deceit or treachery. The tongue stands for the whole man here, the instrument through which his love of destruction reaches other people. With this verse the description of the wicked man is finished, and the next verses announce what God will do to him (Psalm 52:5–7).

Psalm 52 stands between two other psalms that speak to it. Before it comes Psalm 51, David’s own prayer of repentance, and after it comes Psalm 53, which like Psalm 14 describes the folly of those who deny God.

What Scripture says about the tongue

Throughout Scripture the tongue is a small member with great power for good or evil. “Death and life are in the power of the tongue,” says Proverbs (Proverbs 18:21), which also sets rash words beside words that heal (Proverbs 12:18) and warns against the deceitful tongue (Proverbs 10:18). James describes the untamed tongue as “full of deadly poison” (James 3:5–8).

Our words come from what fills our hearts. Jesus said that “out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh” (Matthew 12:34), and that good and evil words come from the good and evil treasure a man keeps in his heart (Luke 6:45). Psalm 52 follows that same order, moving from the tongue in verse 2 to the heart’s loves in verses 3 and 4. The righteous man of the first psalm delights in the law of the LORD (Psalm 1:2), and this man loves devouring words. God, whose words are always true and faithful, sees which love lies behind each tongue.

Jesus, the truthful Word, and the lying tongues against him

The goodness of God that David held to in the face of Doeg’s evil came among us in Jesus. The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth (John 1:14). God showed his love in that Christ died for us while we were still sinners (Romans 5:8). On the cross Christ triumphed over the principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15), and his resurrection shows that God’s goodness wins over every mischief, sin and death included. He will come again to set up God’s righteous reign and end mischief for ever (Revelation 19:11–16).

His words were the opposite of Doeg’s. He is the Word in whom was life and whose light shines in the darkness (John 1:1–5), whose words are spirit and life (John 6:63), and who said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). He always loved good and spoke what was right. Yet he too suffered from tongues that devised mischief, when false witnesses were sought against him (Matthew 26:59–60). He was the Lamb of God (John 1:29), silent before his accusers as Isaiah foretold (Isaiah 53:7), and through that suffering he won our redemption.

Through his Spirit he changes the hearts that the tongue speaks from. Paul tells believers to put off the old self with its deceitful desires and to speak truth to one another (Ephesians 4:22–25), so the tongue that once served deceit can serve grace and truth.

God’s goodness lasts all the day

This psalm gives words to anyone who has watched a liar prosper or been wounded by a lie. David names the evil plainly, its boasting, its careful plotting, its love of lies and of words that swallow people up, and he names it in the presence of God, whose steadfast love lasts the whole day through. Doeg had his day and the priests of Nob lost their lives, and still David could sing that the goodness of God endures continually.

The passage also shows us who God is. He sees what the tongue plans in secret, he hates the lying tongue, and he will deal with the boaster. His goodness is steady when people are cruel, so his people can leave the wicked in his hands and rest their hope on him. The same verses that expose Doeg’s tongue hold up a mirror to ours, because every mouth speaks from the heart, and the Lord who is the truth makes the hearts of his people new.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Psalm 52:1–5. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 5 verses
Passage under commentPsalm 52:1–5
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The title is a brief account of the story which the psalm refers to. David now, at length, saw it necessary to quit the court, and shift for his own safety, for fear of Saul, who had once and again attempted to murder him. Being unprovided wit harms and victuals, he, by a wile, got Ahimelech the priest to furnish him with both. Doeg an Edomite happened to be there, and he went and informed Saul against Ahimelech, representing him as confederate with a traitor, upon which accusation Saul grounded a very bloody warrant, to kill all the priests; and Doeg, the prosecutor, was the executioner, 1 Samuel 22:9, etc. In these verses,

I.David argues the case fairly with this proud and mighty man, Psalm 52:1.

Doeg, it is probably, was mighty in respect of bodily strength; but, if he was, he gained no reputation to it by his easy victory over the unarmed priests of the Lord; it is no honour for those that wear a sword to hector those that wear an ephod. However, he was, by his office, a mighty man, for he was set over the servants of Saul, chamberlain of the household. This was he that boasted himself, not only in the power he had to do mischief, but in the mischief he did. Note, It is bad to do ill, but it is worse to boast of it and glory in it when we have done, not only not to be ashamed of a wicked action, but to justify it, not only to justify it, but to magnify it and value ourselves upon it. Those that glory in their sin glory in their shame, and then it becomes yet more shameful; might men are often mischievous men, and boast of their heart's desire, Psalm 10:3. It is uncertain how the following words come in: The goodness of God endures continually. Some make it the wicked man's answer to this question. The patience and forbearance of God (those great proofs of his goodness) are abused by sinners to the hardening of their hearts in their wicked ways; because sentence against their evil works is not executed speedily, nay, because God is continually doing them good, therefore they boast in mischief; as if their prosperity in their wickedness were an evidence that there is no harm in it. But it is rather to be taken as an argument against him, to show, 1. The sinfulness of his sin: "God is continually doing good, and those that therein are like him have reason to glory in their being so; but thou art continually doing mischief, and therein art utterly unlike him, and contrary to him, and yet gloriest in being so." 2. The folly of it: "Thou thinkest, with the mischief which thou boastest of (so artfully contrived and so successfully carried on), to run down and ruin the people of God; but thou wilt find thyself mistaken: the goodness of God endures continually for their preservation, and then they need not fear what man can do unto them." The enemies in vain boast in their mischief while we have God's mercy to boast in.

II.He draws up a high charge against him in the court of heaven, as he had drawn up a high charge against Ahimelech in Saul's court, Psalm 52:2-4. He accuses him of the wickedness of his tongue (that unruly evil, full of deadly poison) and the wickedness of his heart, which that was an evidence of. Four things he charges him with: - 1. Malice. His tongue does mischief, not only pricking like a needle, but cutting like a sharp razor. Scornful bantering words would not content him; he loved devouring words, words that would ruin the priests of the Lord, whom he hated. 2. Falsehood. It was a deceitful tongue that he did this mischief with (Psalm 52:4); he loved lying (Psalm 52:3), and this sharp razor did work deceitfully (Psalm 52:2), that is, before he had this occasion given him to discover his malice against the priests, he had acted very plausibly towards them; though he was an Edomite, he attended the altars, and brought his offerings, and paid his respects to the priests, as decently as any Israelite; therein he put a force upon himself (for he was detained before the Lord), but thus he gained an opportunity of doing them so much the greater mischief. Or it may refer to the information itself which he gave in against Ahimelech; for the matter of fact was, in substance, true, yet it was misrepresented, and false colours were put upon it, and therefore he might well be said to love lying, and to have a deceitful tongue. He told the truth, but not all the truth, as a witness ought to do; had he told that David made Ahimelech believe he was then going upon Saul's errand, the kindness he showed him would have appeared to be not only not traitorous against Saul, but respectful to him. It will not save us from the guilt of lying to be able to say, "There was some truth in what we said," if we pervert it, and make it to appear otherwise than it was. 3. Subtlety in sin: "Thy tongue devises mischiefs; that is, it speaks the mischief which thy heart devises." The more there is of craft and contrivance in any wickedness the more there is of the devil in it. 4. Affection to sin: "Thou lovest evil more than good; that is, thou lovest evil, and hast no love at all to that which is good; thou takest delight in lying, and makest no conscience of doing right. Thou wouldst rather please Saul by telling a lie than please God by speaking truth." Those are of Doeg's spirit who, instead of being pleased (as we ought all to be) with an opportunity of doing a man a kindness in his body, estate, or good name, are glad when they have a fair occasion to do a man a mischief, and readily close with an opportunity of that kind; that is loving evil more than good. It is bad to speak devouring words, but it is worse to love them either in others or in ourselves.

III.He reads his doom and denounces the judgments of God against him for his wickedness (Psalm 52:5):

"Thou hast destroyed the priests of the Lord and cut them off, and therefore God shall likewise destroy thee for ever." Sons of perdition actively shall be sons of perdition passively, as Judas and the man of sin. Destroyers shall be destroyed; those especially that hate, and persecute, and destroy the priests of the Lord, his ministers and people, who are made to our God priests, a royal priesthood, shall be taken away with a swift and everlasting destruction. Doeg is here condemned,

1.To be driven out of the church: He shall pluck thee out of the tabernacle, not thy dwelling-place, but God's (so it is most probably understood); "thou shalt be cut off from the favour of God, and his presence, and all communion with him, and shalt have no benefit either by oracle or offering." Justly was he deprived of all the privileges of God's house who had been so mischievous to his servants; he had come sometimes to God's tabernacle, and attended in his courts, but he was detained there; he was weary of his service, and sought an opportunity to defame his family; it was very fit therefore that he should be taken away, and plucked out thence; we should forbid any one our house that should serve us so. Note, We forfeit the benefit of ordinances if we make an ill use of them.

2.To be driven out of the world; "He shall root thee out of the land of the living, in which thou thoughtest thyself so deeply rooted." When good men die they are transplanted from the land of the living on earth, the nursery of the plants of righteousness, to that in heaven, the garden of the Lord, where they shall take root for ever; but, when wicked men die, they are rooted out of the land of the living, to perish for ever, as fuel to the fire of divine wrath. This will be the portion of those that contend with God.

Historical interpretation

Historical reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 339–430
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 339Eusebius of CaesareaPost-Nicene
The material we have before us was spoken much earlier in time than the history pertaining to the 50th Psalm. For [the history of Doeg] took place, and [the words] were spoken, while Saul was still alive, and before David's kingship. Many long years later, after the death of Saul, and at the end of his own kingship, David made the confession contained in the 50th Psalm, which he placed before [the 51st] because of its connection to the 49th Psalm, as I have already shown. Those Psalms, 20 in number, from 51 to 70, with epigraphs "of David," took their subject-matter from a different point of origin: indeed, they appear to have been spoken while Saul was still alive, before David reigned. For the one before us now was spoken while Saul was still alive, "when Doeg the Idumaean came and reported to Saul…'David came to the house of Abimelech.'" But the 53rd Psalm too was spoken "when the Ziphites came and told Saul, 'Look--is not David hidden with us?'" Also, the 55th Psalm has this epigraph: "When the Philistines seized him in Gath"—and this period too precedes David's kingship, while Saul still survived alive. And the 56th Psalm gives the epigraph: "Of David, when he was running away from Saul into the cave." In the same way also, the 58th Psalm says [in the epigraph], "When Saul sent, and guarded his house, in order to kill him." The 59th Psalm, however, even though it was spoken after the death of Saul, when David was now king, still preceded the actions relating to Uriah. This is indicated by the heading, which shows the time period involved by saying, "When he set on fire Mesopotamia of Syria, and Syria Soba, and Joab returned and smote the Ravine of Salt—twelve thousand." And this chronologically precedes the confession expressed in the 50th Psalm. Furthermore, the 62nd Psalm was spoken by David "when he was in the desert of Idumaea," while Saul was still living. Consider how more or less the majority of the second part of the book of the Psalms of David (apart from the 50th) include those which were spoken by him before the period of his actions pertaining to Uriah.

The first part of the same book, however, from the first Psalm to the 40th, [seemed to] contradict that order; for that part included those dating after the confession of the 50th Psalm. The third Psalm, then, was spoken by David "when he was running away from Absalom his son." And he was fleeing from his son after the events connected to Uriah. But also in the sixth Psalm, he was mourning for the same actions, saying, "I grew tired in my groaning; I shall wash my bed every night—with my tears I shall moisten my mattress." And the seventh Psalm, spoken "for the words of Cush the son of Iamin," would belong to the same time period. Moreover, also the 17th Psalm has been proved to have been spoken at the end of David's life. But also the 37th Psalm, with the epigraph "for remembrance," having the same train of thought as the sixth, begins with the same words, saying, "Lord, do not rebuke me in your anger, and do not correct me in your wrath." And going forward, he makes the same confession as that in the 50th Psalm, besides other passages, also when he says, "For my transgressions have gone over my head…My wounds stank and decayed before my foolishness."

And if you bring together [these indications] for yourself, you will discover that the majority of the Psalms in the first part were spoken after the time period of the history relating to Uriah, whereas those following the 50th Psalm precede [David's] actions regarding Uriah chronologically. Why in the world, then, were the first ones in chronological sequence not put in first place—and instead, those which were spoken first, while Saul was still living, are in the second part of the Psalms—and those which are chronologically last are in the first part? I think they have this arrangement so that the discourse would not move from the better to the worse; for the phrase, "to the end, lest you be destroyed," appears to have been observed also in the case of the Psalms' arrangement. For this reason, the gloomier material was placed first, so that the nicer / more useful material would be kept for second, the worse things being hidden and made to disappear by the appearance of the better ones in second place. And it is likely that David wished to draw a veil over his fault afterwards by means of his prior good deeds. And someone might say that he arranged his confessions first in accordance with tremendous piety, because "the righteous one is his own accuser in the opening prosecution" But since so many things about the arrangement apparent [in the book of Psalms] have been laid bare for you, it is now time to pass on also to the words of Psalm 51 that are before us.

Well then, he writes the words in question after learning what Doeg the Syrian had brought about by means of his slanders against David. Therefore he speaks as though addressing him: "Why do you boast in wickedness, you powerful one?"—or as though addressing the devil, who was at work in him. For he was not unaware of the one who was opposing him at all times and always fighting against him, at one time through Saul, in the current instance through Doeg, and at other times in different ways through different people. So then, the one who is powerless and weak and slight in wickedness, when the better character prevails in him, since he is feebler in wickedness, will hide himself as he sins and is pricked by his conscience, and will repent, and devise for himself a remedy for his own wickedness using confession and true repentance. The one who is powerful in wickedness, however, goes crazy and boasts over it, as though he were making himself more majestic by a great good deed.

And the passage before us appears to me to be describing the character that is the opposite of the one that made the prior confession in the 50th Psalm. For in that Psalm, after slipping once into wickedness, he repented in the end and wore himself out with confession, and lamentation over his own evil deeds.
"In iniquity the whole day upon injustice has your tongue thought" [Psalm 52:2]: that is, in the whole of time, without weariness, without intermission, without cessation. And when you do not, you think, so that when anything of evil is away from your hands, from your heart it is not away; either you do an evil thing, or while you can not do, you say an evil thing, that is, thou evil-speakest: or when not even this you can do, you will and thinkest an evil thing. "The whole day," then, that is, without intermission. We expect punishment to this man. Is he to himself a small punishment? Thou threatenest him: thou, when you threaten him, wilt send him whither? Unto evil? Send him away unto himself. In order that you may vent much rage, you are going to give him into the power of beasts: unto himself he is worse than beasts. For a beast can mangle his body: of himself he cannot leave his heart whole. Within, against himself he does rage of himself, and do you from without seek for stripes? Nay, pray God for him, that he may be set free from himself. Nevertheless in this Psalm, my brethren, there is not a prayer for evil men, or against evil men, but a prophecy of what is to result to evil men. Think not therefore that the Psalm of ill-will says anything: for it is said in the spirit of prophecy.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Psalm 52:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8