Matthew 12:34
“The Beelzebul Controversy and Blasphemy”Matthew 12:22–37
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- γεννήματαgennēmataOffspringG1081N-VPNNoun Vocative Plural Neuter
- ἐχιδνῶνechidnōnof vipersG2191N-GPFNoun Genitive Plural Feminine
- πῶςpōshowG4459PRT-IInterrogative Particle Interrogative
- δύνασθεdunastheare you ableG1410V-PNI-2PVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Indicative 2nd Plural
- ἀγαθὰagathagood thingsG18A-APNAdjective Accusative Plural Neuter
- λαλεῖνlaleinto speakG2980V-PANVerb Present Active Infinitive
- πονηροὶponēroievilG4190A-NPMAdjective Nominative Plural Masculine
- ὄντες;ontesbeing?G1510V-PAP-NPMVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Plural Masculine
- ἐκekOut ofG1537PREPPreposition
- γὰρgarforG1063CONJConjunction
- τοῦtoutheG3588T-GSNDefinite article Genitive Singular Neuter
- περισσεύματοςperisseumatosoverflowG4051N-GSNNoun Genitive Singular Neuter
- τῆςtēsof theG3588T-GSFDefinite article Genitive Singular Feminine
- καρδίαςkardiasheartG2588N-GSFNoun Genitive Singular Feminine
- τὸtotheG3588T-NSNDefinite article Nominative Singular Neuter
- στόμαstomamouthG4750N-NSNNoun Nominative Singular Neuter
- λαλεῖlaleispeaksG2980V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps



Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Matthew 12:22–37. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
In these verses we have,
I.Christ's glorious conquest of Satan, in the gracious cure of one who, by the divine permission, was under his power, and in his possession, Matthew 12:22. Here observe,
1.The man's case was very sad; he was possessed with a devil. More cases of this kind occurred in Christ's time than usual, that Christ's power might be the more magnified, and his purpose the more manifested, in opposing and dispossessing Satan; and that it might the more evidently appear, that he came to destroy the works of the devil. This poor man that was possessed was blind and dumb; a miserable case! he could neither see to help himself, nor speak to others to help him. A soul under Satan's power, and led captive by him, is blind in the things of God, and dumb at the throne of grace; sees nothing, and says nothing to the purpose. Satan blinds the eye of faith, and seals up the lips of prayer.
2.His cure was very strange, and the more so, because sudden; he healed him. Note, The conquering and dispossessing of Satan is the healing of souls. And the cause being removed, immediately the effect ceased; the blind and dumb both spake and saw. Note, Christ's mercy is directly opposite to Satan's malice; his favours, to the devil's mischiefs. When Satan's power is broken in the soul, the eyes are opened to see God's glory, and the lips opened to speak his praise.
II.The conviction which this gave to the people to all the people:
they were amazed. Christ had wrought divers miracles of this kind before; but his works are not the less wonderful, nor the less to be wondered at, for their being often repeated. They inferred from it, "Is not this the Son of David? The Messiah promised, that was to spring from the loins of David? Is not this he that should come?" We may take this, 1. As an enquiring question; they asked, Is not this the Son of David? But they did not stay for an answer: the impressions were cogent, but they were transient. It was a good question that they started; but, it should seem, it was soon lost, and was not prosecuted. Such convictions as these should be brought to a head, and then they are likely to be brought to the heart. Or, 2. as an affirming question; Is not this the Son of David? "Yes, certainly it is, it can be no other; such miracles as these plainly evince that the kingdom of the Messiah is now setting up." And they were the people, the vulgar sort of the spectators, that drew this inference from Christ's miracles. Atheists will say, "That was because they were less prying than the Pharisees;" no, the matter of fact was obvious, and required not much search: but it was because they were less prejudiced and biassed by worldly interest. So plain and easy was the way made to this great truth of Christ being the Messiah and Saviour of the world, that the common people could not miss it; the wayfaring men, though fools, could not err therein. See Isaiah 35:8. It was found of them that sought it. It is an instance of the condescensions of divine grace, that the things that were hid from the wise and prudent were revealed unto babes. The world by wisdom knew not God, and by the foolish things the wise were confounded.
III.The blasphemous cavil of the Pharisees, v.
24. The Pharisees were a sort of men that pretended to more knowledge in, and zeal for, the divine law, than other people; yet they were the most inveterate enemies to Christ and his doctrine. They were proud of the reputation they had among the people; that fed their pride, supported their power, and filled their purses; and when they heard the people say, Is not this the Son of David? they were extremely irritated, more at that than at the miracle itself; this made them jealous of our Lord Jesus, and apprehensive, that as his interest in the people's esteem increased, theirs must of course be eclipsed and diminished; therefore they envied him, as Saul did his father David, because of what the women sang of him, 1 Samuel 18:7, 1 Samuel 18:8. Note, Those who bind up their happiness in the praise and applause of men, expose themselves to a perpetual uneasiness upon every favourable word that they hear said of any other. The shadow of honour followed Christ, who fled from it, and fled from the Pharisees, who were eager in the pursuit of it. They said, "This fellow does not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils, and therefore is not the Son of David." Observe,
1.How scornfully they speak of Christ, this fellow; as if that precious name of his, which is as ointment poured forth, were not worthy to be taken into their lips. It is an instance of their pride and superciliousness, and their diabolical envy, that the more people magnified Christ, the more industrious they were to vilify him. It is a bad thing to speak of good men with disdain because they are poor.
2.How blasphemously they speak of his miracles; they could not deny the matter of fact; it was as plain as the sun, that devils were cast out by the word of Christ; nor could they deny that it was an extraordinary thing, and supernatural. Being thus forced to grant the premises, they had no other way to avoid the conclusion, that this is the Son of David, than by suggesting that Christ cast out devils by Beelzebub; that there was a compact between Christ and the devil; pursuant to that, the devil was not cast out, but did voluntarily retire, and give back by consent and with design: or as if, by an agreement with the ruling devil, he had power to cast out the inferior devils. No surmise could be more palpably false and vile than this; that he, who is Truth itself, should be in combination with the father of lies, to cheat the world. This was the last refuge, or subterfuge rather, or an obstinate infidelity, that was resolved to stand it out against the clearest conviction. Observe, Among the devils there is a prince, the ringleader of the apostasy from God and rebellion against him; but this prince is Beelzebub - the god of a fly, or a dunghill god. How art thou fallen, O Lucifer! from an anger of light, to be a lord of flies! Yet this is the prince of the devils too, the chief of the gang of infernal spirits.
IV.Christ's reply to this base insinuation, Matthew 12:25-30.
Jesus knew their thoughts. Note, Jesus Christ knows what we are thinking at any time, knows what is in man; he understands our thoughts afar off. It should seem that the Pharisees could not for shame speak it out, but kept it in their minds; they could not expect to satisfy the people with it; they therefore reserved it for the silencing of the convictions of their own consciences. Note, Many are kept off from their duty by that which they are ashamed to own, but which they cannot hide from Jesus Christ: yet it is probable that the Pharisees had whispered what they thought among themselves, to help to harden one another; but Christ's reply is said to be to their thoughts, because he knew with what mind, and from what principle, they said it; that they did not say it in their haste, but that it was the product of a rooted malignity.
Christ's reply to this imputation is copious and cogent, that every mouth may be stopped with sense and reason, before it be stopped with fire and brimstone. Here are three arguments by which he demonstrates the unreasonableness of this suggestion.
1.It would be very strange, and highly improbably, that Satan should be cast out by such a compact, because then Satan's kingdom would be divided against itself; which, considering his subtlety, is not a thing to be imagined, Matthew 12:25, Matthew 12:26.
(1.)Here is a known rule laid down, that in all societies a common ruin is the consequence of mutual quarrels: Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every family too: Quae enim domus tam stabilis est, quae tam firma civitas, quae non odiis atque dissidiis funditus everti possit? - For what family is so strong, what community so firm, as not to be overturned by enmity and dissension? Cic. Lael. 7. Divisions commonly end in desolations; if we clash, we break; if we divide one from another, we become an easy prey to a common enemy; much more if we bite and devour one another, shall we be consumed one of another, Galatians 5:15. Churches and nations have known this by sad experience.
(2.)The application of it to the case in hand (Matthew 12:26), If Satan cast out Satan; if the prince of the devils should be at variance with the inferior devils, the whole kingdom and interest would soon be broken; nay, if Satan should come into a compact with Christ, it must be to his own ruin; for the manifest design and tendency of Christ's preaching and miracles was to overthrow the kingdom of Satan, as a kingdom of darkness, wickedness, and enmity to God; and to set up, upon the ruins of it, a kingdom of light, holiness, and love. The works of the devil, as a rebel against God, and a tyrant over the souls of men, were destroyed by Christ; and therefore it was the most absurd thing imaginable, to think that Beelzebub should at all countenance such a design, or come into it: if he should fall in with Christ, how should then his kingdom stand? He would himself contribute to the overthrow of it. Note, The devil has a kingdom, a common interest, in opposition to God and Christ, which, to the utmost of his power, he will make to stand, and he will never come into Christ's interests; he must be conquered and broken by Christ, and therefore cannot submit and bend to him. What concord or communion can there be between light and darkness, Christ and Belial, Christ and Beelzebub? Christ will destroy the devil's kingdom, but he needs not do it by any such little arts and projects as that of a secret compact with Beelzebub; no, this victory must be obtained by nobler methods. Let the prince of the devils muster up all his forces, let him make use of all his powers and politics, and keep his interests in the closest confederacy, yet Christ will be too hard for his united force, and his kingdom shall not stand.
2.It was not at all strange, or improbable, that devils should be cast out by the Spirit of God; for,
(1.)How otherwise do your children cast them out? There were those among the Jews who, by invocation of the name of the most high God, or the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, did sometimes cast out devils. Josephus speaks of some in his time that did it; we read of Jewish exorcists (Acts 19:13), and of some that in Christ's name cast out devils, though they did not follow him (Mark 9:38), or were not faithful to him, Matthew 7:22. These the Pharisees condemned not, but imputed what they did to the Spirit of God, and valued themselves and their nation upon it. It was therefore merely from spite and envy to Christ, that they would own that others cast out devils by the Spirit of God, but suggest that he did it by compact with Beelzebub. Note, It is the way of malicious people, especially the malicious persecutors of Christ and Christianity, to condemn the same thing in those they hate, which they approve of and applaud in those they have a kindness for: the judgments of envy are made, not by things, but persons; not by reason, but prejudice. But those were very unfit to sit in Moses's seat, who knew faces, and knew nothing else in judgment: Therefore they shall be your judges; "This contradicting of yourselves will rise up in judgment against you at the last great day, and will condemn you." Note, In the last judgment, not only every sin, but every aggravation of it, will be brought into the account, and some of our notions that were right and good will be brought in evidence against us, to convict us of partiality.
(2.)This casting out of devils was a certain token and indication of the approach and appearance of the kingdom of God (Matthew 7:28); "But if it be indeed that I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, as certainly I do, then you must conclude, that though you are unwilling to receive it, yet the kingdom of the Messiah is now about to be set up among you." Other miracles that Christ wrought proved him sent of God, but this proved him sent of God to destroy the devil's kingdom and his works. Now that great promise was evidently fulfilled, that the seed of the woman should break the serpent's head, Genesis 3:15. "Therefore that glorious dispensation of the kingdom of God, which has been long expected, is now commenced; slight it at your peril." Note,
[1.]The destruction of the devil's power is wrought by the Spirit of God; that Spirit who works to the obedience of faith, overthrows the interest of that spirit who works in the children of unbelief and disobedience.
[2.]The casting out of devils is a certain introduction to the kingdom of God. If the devil's interest in a soul be not only checked by custom or external restraints, but sunk and broken by the Spirit of God, as a Sanctifier, no doubt but the kingdom of God is come to that soul, the kingdom of grace, a blessed earnest of the kingdom of the glory.
3.The comparing of Christ's miracles, particularly this of casting out devils, with his doctrine, and the design and tendency of his holy religion, evidenced that he was so far from being in league with Satan, that he was at open enmity and hostility against him (Matthew 12:29); How can one enter into a strong man's house, and plunder his goods, and carry them away, except he first bind the strong man? And then he may do what he pleases with his goods. The world, that sat in darkness, and lay in wickedness, was in Satan's possession, and under his power, as a house in the possession and under the power of a strong man; so is every unregenerate soul; there Satan resides, there he rules. Now,
(1.)The design of Christ's gospel was to spoil the devil's house, which, as a strong man, he kept in the world; to turn the people from darkness to light, from sin to holiness, from this world to a better, from the power of Satan unto God (Acts 26:18); to alter the property of souls.
(2.)Pursuant to this design, he bound the strong man, when he cast out unclean spirits by his word: thus he wrested the sword out of the devil's hand, that he might wrest the sceptre out of it. The doctrine of Christ teaches us how to construe his miracles, and when he showed how easily and effectually he could cast the devil out of people's bodies, he encouraged all believers to hope that, whatever power Satan might usurp and exercise in the souls of men, Christ by his grace would break it: he will spoil him, for it appears that he can bind him. When nations were turned from the service of idols to serve the living God, when some of the worst of sinners were sanctified and justified, and became the best of saints, then Christ spoiled the devil's house, and will spoil it more and more.
4.It is here intimated, that this holy war, which Christ was carrying on with vigour against the devil and his kingdom, was such as would not admit of a neutrality (Matthew 12:30), He that is not with me is against me. In the little differences that may arise between the disciples of Christ among themselves, we are taught to lessen the matters in variance, and to seek peace, by accounting those who are not against us, to be with us (Luke 9:50); but in the great quarrel between Christ and the devil, no peace is to be sought, nor any such favourable construction to be made of any indifference in the matter; he that is not hearty for Christ, will be reckoned with as really against him: he that is cold in the cause, is looked upon as an enemy. When the dispute is between God and Baal, there is no halting between two (1 Kings 18:21), there is no trimming between Christ and Belial; for the kingdom of Christ, as it is eternally opposite to, so it will be eternally victorious over, the devil's kingdom; and therefore in this cause there is no sitting still with Gilead beyond Jordan, or Asher on the sea-shore, (Judges 4:16, Judges 4:17), we must be entirely, faithfully, and immovably, on Christ's side; it is the right side, and will at last be the rising side. See Exodus 32:26.
The latter clause is to the same purport: He that gathereth not with me scattereth. Note, (1.) Christ's errand into the world was to gather, to gather in his harvest, to gather in those whom the Father had given him, John 11:52; Ephesians 1:10. (2.) Christ expects and requires from those who are with him, that they gather with him; that they not only gather to him themselves, but do all they can in their places to gather others to him, and so to strengthen his interest. (3.) Those who will not appear, and act, as furtherers of Christ's kingdom, will be looked upon, and dealt with, as hinderers of it; if we gather not with Christ, we scatter; it is not enough, not to do hurt, but we must do good. Thus is the breach widened between Christ and Satan, to show that there was no such compact between them as the Pharisees whispered.
V.Here is a discourse of Christ's upon this occasion, concerning tongue-sins; Wherefore I say unto you.
He seems to turn from the Pharisees to the people, from disputing to instructing; and from the sin of the Pharisees he warns the people concerning three sorts of tongue-sins; for others' harms are admonitions to us.
1.Blasphemous words against the Holy Ghost are the worst kind of tongue-sins, and unpardonable, Matthew 12:31, Matthew 12:32.
(1.)Here is a gracious assurance of the pardon of all sin upon gospel terms: this Christ says to us, and it is a comfortable saying, that the greatness of sin shall be no bar to our acceptance with God, if we truly repent and believe the gospel: All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men. Though the sin has been as scarlet and crimson (Isaiah 1:18), though ever so heinous in its nature, ever so much aggravated by its circumstances, and ever so often repeated, though it reach up to the heavens, yet with the Lord there is mercy, that reacheth beyond the heavens; mercy will be extended even to blasphemy, a sin immediately touching God's name and honour. Paul obtained mercy, who had been a blasphemer, 1 Timothy 1:13. Well may we say, Who is a God like unto thee, pardoning iniquity? Micah 7:18. Even words spoken against the Son of man shall be forgiven; as theirs were who reviled him at his death, many of whom repented and found mercy. Christ herein has set an example to all the sons of men, to be ready to forgive words spoken against them: I, as a deaf man, heard not. Observe, They shall be forgiven unto men, not to devils; this is love to the whole world of mankind, above the world of fallen angels, that all sin is pardonable to them.
(2.)Here is an exception of the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, which is here declared to be the only unpardonable sin. See here,
[1.]What this sin; it is speaking against the Holy Ghost. See what malignity there is in tongue-sins, when the only unpardonable sin is so. But Jesus knew their thoughts, Matthew 12:25. It is not all speaking against the person or essence of the Holy Ghost, or some of his more private operations, or merely the resisting of his internal working in the sinner himself, that is here meant; for who then should be saved? It is adjudged in our law, that an act of indemnity shall always be construed in favour of that grace and clemency which is the intention of the act; and therefore the exceptions in the act are not to be extended further than needs must. The gospel is an act of indemnity; none are excepted by name, nor any by description, but those only that blaspheme the Holy Ghost; which therefore must be construed in the narrowest sense: all presuming sinners are effectually cut off by the conditions of the indemnity, faith and repentance; and therefore the other exceptions must not be stretched far: and this blasphemy is excepted, not for any defect of mercy in God or merit in Christ, but because it inevitably leaves the sinner in infidelity and impenitency. We have reason to think that none are guilty of this sin, who believe that Christ is the Son of God, and sincerely desire to have part in his merit and mercy: and those who fear they have committed this sin, give a good sign that they have not. The learned Dr. Whitby very well observes, that Christ speaks not of what should be (Mark 3:28; Luke 12:10); Whosoever shall blaspheme. As for those who blasphemed Christ when he was here upon earth, and called him a Winebibber, a Deceiver, a Blasphemer, and the like, they had some colour of excuse, because of the meanness of his appearance, and the prejudices of the nation against him; and the proof of his divine mission was not perfected till after his ascension; and therefore, upon their repentance, they shall be pardoned: and it is hoped that they may be convinced by the pouring out of the Spirit, as many of them were, who had been his betrayers and murderers. But if, when the Holy Ghost is given, in his inward gifts of revelation, speaking with tongues, and the like, such as were the distributions of the Spirit among the apostles, if they continue to blaspheme the Spirit likewise, as an evil spirit, there is no hope of them that they will ever be brought to believe in Christ; for First, Those gifts of the Holy Ghost in the apostles were the last proof that God designed to make use of for the confirming of the gospel, and were still kept in reserve, when other methods preceded. Secondly, This was the most powerful evidence, and more apt to convince than miracles themselves. Thirdly, Those therefore who blaspheme this dispensation of the Spirit, cannot possibly be brought to believe in Christ; those who shall impute them to a collusion with Satan, as the Pharisees did the miracles, what can convince them? This is such a strong hold of infidelity as a man can never be beaten out of, and is therefore unpardonable, because hereby repentance is hid from the sinner's eyes.
[2.]What the sentence is that is passed upon it; It shall not be forgiven, neither in this world, nor in the world to come. As in the then present state of the Jewish church, there was no sacrifice of expiation for the soul that sinned presumptuously; so neither under the dispensation of gospel grace, which is often in scripture called the world to come, shall there be any pardon to such as tread underfoot the blood of the covenant, and do despite to the Spirit of grace: there is no cure for a sin so directly against the remedy. It was a rule in our old law, No sanctuary for sacrilege. Or, It shall be forgiven neither now, in the sinner's own conscience, nor in the great day, when the pardon shall be published. Or, this is a sin that exposes the sinner both to temporal and eternal punishment, both to present wrath and the wrath to come.
2.Christ speaks here concerning other wicked words, the products of corruption reigning in the heart, and breaking out thence, Matthew 12:33-35. It was said (Matthew 12:25) that Jesus knew their thoughts, and here he spoke with an eye to them, showing that it was not strange that they should speak so ill, when their hearts were so full of enmity and malice; which yet they often endeavoured to cloak and cover, by feigning themselves just men. Our Lord Jesus therefore points to the springs and heals them; let the heart be sanctified and it will appear in our words.
(1.)The heart is the root, the language is the fruit (Matthew 12:33); if the nature of the tree be good, it will bring forth fruit accordingly. Where grace is the reigning principle in the heart, the language will be the language of Canaan; and, on the contrary, whatever lust reigns in the heart it will break out; diseased lungs make an offensive breath: men's language discovers what country they are of, so likewise what manner of spirit they are of: "Either make the tree good, and then the fruit will be good; get pure hearts and then you will have pure lips and pure lives; or else the tree will be corrupt, and the fruit accordingly. you may make a crab-stock to become a good tree, by grafting into it a shoot from a good tree, and then the fruit will be good; but if the tree be still the same, plant it where you will, and water it how you will, the fruit will be still corrupt." Note, Unless the heart be transformed, the life will never be thoroughly reformed. These Pharisees were shy of speaking out their wicked thoughts of Jesus Christ; but Christ here intimates, how vain it was for them to seek to hide that root of bitterness in them, that bore this gall and wormwood, when they never sought to mortify it. Note, It should be more our care to be good really, than to seem good outwardly.
(2.)The heart is the fountain, the words are the streams (Matthew 12:34); Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks, as the streams are the overflowings of the spring. A wicked heart is said to send forth wickedness, as a fountain casts forth her waters, Jeremiah 6:7. A troubled fountain, and a corrupt spring, such as Solomon speaks of (Proverbs 25:26), must needs send forth muddy and unpleasant streams. Evil words are the natural, genuine product of an evil heart. Nothing but the salt of grace, cast into the spring, will heal the waters, season the speech, and purify the corrupt communications. This they wanted, they were evil; and how can ye, being evil, speak good things? They were a generation of vipers; John Baptist had called them so (Matthew 3:7), and they were still the same; for can the Ethiopian change his skin? The people looked upon the Pharisees as a generation of saints, but Christ calls them a generation of vipers, the seed of the serpent, that had an enmity to Christ and his gospel. Now what could be expected from a generation of vipers, but that which is poisonous and malignant? Can the viper be otherwise than venomous? Note, Bad things may be expected from bad people, as said the proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth from the wicked, 1 Samuel 24:13. The vile person will speak villany, Isaiah 32:6. Those who are themselves evil, have neither skill nor will to speak good things, as they should be spoken. Christ would have his disciples know what sort of men they were to live among, that they might know what to look for. They are as Ezekiel among scorpions (Ezekiel 2:6), and must not think it strange if they be stung and bitten.
(3.)The heart is the treasury, the words are the things brought out of that treasury (Matthew 12:35); and from hence men's characters may be drawn, and may be judged of.
[1.]It is the character of a good man, that he has a good treasure in his heart, and from thence brings forth good things, as there is occasion. Graces, comforts, experiences, good knowledge, good affections, good resolutions, these are a good treasure in the heart; the word of God hidden there, the law of God written there, divine truths dwelling and ruling thee, are a treasure there, valuable and suitable, kept safe and kept secret, as the stores of the good householder, but ready for use upon all occasions. A good man, thus furnished, will bring forth, as Joseph out of his stores; will be speaking and doing that which is good, for God's glory, and the edification of others. See Proverbs 10:11, Proverbs 10:13, Proverbs 10:14, Proverbs 10:20, Proverbs 10:21, Proverbs 10:31, Proverbs 10:32. This is bringing forth good things. Some pretend to good expenses that have not a good treasure - such will soon be bankrupts: some pretend to have a good treasure within, but give no proof of it: they hope they have it in them, and thank God, whatever their words and actions are, they have good hearts; but faith without works is dead: and some have a good treasure of wisdom and knowledge, but they are not communicative, they do not bring forth out of it: they have a talent, but know not how to trade with it. The complete Christian in this bears the image of God, that he both is good, and does good.
[2.]It is the character of an evil man, that he has an evil treasure in his heart, and out of it bringeth forth evil things. Lusts and corruptions dwelling and reigning in the heart are an evil treasure, out of which the sinner brings forth bad words and actions, to the dishonour of God, and the hurt of others. See Genesis 6:5, Genesis 6:12; Matthew 15:18-20; James 1:15. But treasures of wickedness (Proverbs 10:2) will be treasures of wrath.
3.Christ speaks here concerning idle words, and shows what evil there is in them (Matthew 12:36, Matthew 12:37); much more is there in such wicked words as the Pharisees spoke. It concerns us to think much of the day of judgment, that that may be a check upon our tongues; and let us consider,
(1.)How particular the account will be of tongue-sins in that day: even for every idle words, or discourse, that men speak, they shall give account. This intimates,
[1.]That God takes notice of every word we say, even that which we ourselves do not notice. See Psalm 139:4. Not a word in my tongue but thou knowest it: though spoken without regard or design, God takes cognizance of it.
[2.]That vain, idle, impertinent talk is displeasing to God, which tends not to any good purpose, is not good to any use of edifying; it is the product of a vain and trifling heart. These idle words are the same with that foolish talking and jesting which is forbidden, Ephesians 5:4. This is that sin which is seldom wanting in the multitude of words, unprofitable talk, Job 15:3.
[3.]We must shortly account for these idle words; they will be produced in evidence against us, to prove us unprofitable servants, that have not improved the faculties of reason and speech, which are part of the talents we are entrusted with. If we repent not of our idle words, and our account for them be not balanced by the blood of Christ, we are undone.
(2.)How strict the judgment will be upon that account (Matthew 12:37); By thy words thou shall be justified or condemned; a common rule in men's judgments, and here applied to God's. Note, The constant tenour of our discourse, according as it is gracious or not gracious, will be an evidence for us, or against us, at the great day. Those who seemed to be religious, but bridled not their tongue, will then be found to have put a cheat upon themselves with a vain religion, James 1:26. Some think that Christ here refers to that of Eliphaz (Job 15:6), Thine own mouth condemneth thee, and not I; or, rather, to that of Solomon (Proverbs 18:21), Death and life are in the power of the tongue.
Historical interpretation
Seven Centuries of Reception
12 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
He taught that a corrupt outlook on life arises out of a corrupted nature. He taught that from an evil storehouse nothing can come but what is evil. An account must be rendered to God for every idle, careless and useless word. We are to be condemned or justified by the words we speak. The mercy or the judgment we receive shall depend on the inward conviction we have about the Lord of heavenly glory.
Thus did He at that present refute the Jews, who seeing Christ's works to be of power more than human, would notwithstanding not allow the hand of God. And at the same time He convicts all future errors of the faith, such as that of those who taking away from the Lord His divinity, and communion of the Father's substance, have fallen into divers heresies; having their habitation neither under the plea of ignorance as the Gentiles, nor yet within the knowledge of the truth. He figures Himself as a tree set in the body, seeing that through the inward fruitfulness of His power sprung forth abundant richness of fruit. Therefore either must be made a good tree with good fruits, or an evil tree with evil fruits; not that a good tree is to be made a bad tree, or the reverse; but that in this metaphor we may understand that Christ is either to be left in fruitlessness, or to be retained in the fruitfulness of good works. But to hold one's self neuter, to attribute some things to Christ, but to deny Him those things that are highest, to worship Him as God, and yet to deny Him a common substance with the Father, is blasphemy against the Spirit. In admiration of His so great works you dare not take away the name of God, yet through malevolence of soul you debase His high nature by denying His participation of the Father's substance.
Then since He is arguing not for Himself, but for the Spirit, He hath dealt out His reproof even as a torrent, saying, "O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things?"
Now this is at once to accuse, and to give demonstration of His own sayings from their case. For behold, saith He, ye being evil trees, cannot bring forth good fruit. I do not then marvel at your talking thus: for ye were both ill nurtured, being of wicked ancestors, and ye have acquired a bad mind.
And see how carefully, and without any hold for exception, He hath expressed His accusations: in that He said not, "How can ye speak good things, being a generation of vipers? (for this latter is nothing to the former): but, "How can ye, being evil, speak good things?"
But He called them "broods of vipers," because they prided themselves on their forefathers. To signify therefore that they had no advantage thereby, He both casts them out from their relationship to Abraham, and assigns them forefathers of kindred disposition, having stripped them of that ground of illustriousness.
"For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh." Here again He indicates His Godhead, which knew their secrets: and that not for words only, but also for wicked thoughts, they shall suffer punishment; and that He knows it all, as God. And He saith, that it is possible even for men to know these things; for this is a natural consequence, that when wickedness is overflowing within, its words should be poured forth through the lips. So that when thou hearest a man speak wicked words, do not suppose only so much wickedness to be in him as the words display, but conjecture the fountain to be much more abundant; for that which is spoken outwardly, is the superabundance of that which is within.
See how vehemently He reprehends them. For if what they had said is so evil, and is of the very mind of the devil, consider the root and well-spring of their words, how far that must reach. And this is naturally the case; for while the tongue through shame often pours not forth all its wickedness at once, the heart having no human witness, fearlessly gives birth to whatever evils it will; for of God it hath not much regard. Since then men's sayings come to examination: and are set before all, but the heart is concealed; therefore the evils of the former grow less, while those of the latter increase. But when that within is multiplied, all that hath been awhile hidden comes forth with a violent gushing. And as persons vomiting strive at first to keep down the humors that force their way out, but, when they are overcome, cast forth much abomination; so do they that devise evil things, and speak ill of their neighbors. And what can be more barbarous than this, to overlook our soul that is more precious than all, abused by so many adulterers, and so long companying with them, even until they are sated; which will never be.
Again in another way He shames them, and is not content with His former refutations. But this He doth, not freeing Himself from accusations, (for what went before was quite enough), but as wishing to amend them.
Now His meaning is like this: none of you hath either found fault about the persons healed, as not being healed; nor hath said, that it is an evil thing to deliver one from a devil. For though they had been ever so shameless, they could not have said this.
Since therefore they brought no charge against the works, but were defaming the Doer of them, He signifies that this accusation is against both the common modes of reasoning, and the congruity of the circumstances. A thing of aggravated shamelessness, not only to interpret maliciously, but also to make up such charges as are contrary to men's common notions.
And see how free He is from contentiousness. For He said not, "Make the tree good, forasmuch as the fruit also is good;" but, most entirely stopping their mouths, and exhibiting His own considerateness, and their insolence, He saith, Even if ye are minded to find fault with my works, I forbid it not at all, only bring not inconsistent and contradictory charges. For thus were they sure to be most clearly detected, persisting against what was too palpable. Wherefore to no purpose is your maliciousness, saith He, and your self-contradictory statements. Because in truth the distinction of the tree is shown by the fruit, not the fruit by the tree; but ye do the contrary. For what if the tree be the origin of the fruit; yet it is the fruit that makes the tree to be known. And it were consistent, either in blaming us to find fault with our works too, or praising these, to set us who do them free from these charges. But now ye do the contrary; for having no fault to find with the works, which is the fruit, ye pass the opposite judgment upon the tree, calling me a demoniac; which is utter insanity.
Yea, and what He had said before, this He establishes now also; that a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, nor again can the converse be. So that their charges were against all consistency and nature.
(Hom. xlii.) After his former answers He here again refutes them in another manner. This He does not in order to do away their charges against Himself, but desiring to amend them, saying, Either make the tree good and his fruit good, or make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt. As much as to say, None of you has said that it is an evil thing for a man to be delivered from dæmons. But because they did not speak evil of the works, but said that it was the Devil that wrought them, He shows that this charge is contrary to the common sense of things, and human conceptions. And to invent such charges can only proceed from unbounded impudence.
For the discerning of a tree is done by its fruits, not the fruits by the tree. A tree is known by its fruits. For though the tree is the cause of the fruit, yet the fruit is the evidence of the tree. But ye do the very contrary, having no fault to allege against the works, ye pass a sentence of evil against the tree, saying that I have a dæmon.
But as speaking not for Himself but for the Holy Spirit, He accordingly rebukes them, saying, Generation of vipers, how can ye being evil speak good things? This is both a rebuke of them, and a proof in their own characters of those things which had been said. As though He had said, So ye being corrupt trees cannot bring forth good fruit. I do not wonder then that you thus speak, for you are ill nourished of ill parentage, and have an evil mind. And observe He said not, How can ye speak good things, seeing ye are a generation of vipers? for these two are not connected together; but He said, How can ye being evil speak good things? He calls them generation of vipers, because they made boast of their forefathers; in order therefore to cut off this their pride, He shuts them out of the race of Abraham, assigning them a parentage corresponding to their characters.
Herein also He shows His Godhead as knowing the hidden things of the heart; for not for words only, yea but for evil thoughts also they shall receive punishment. For it is the order of nature that the store of the wickedness which abounds within should be poured forth in words through the mouth. Thus when you shall hear any speaking evil, you must infer that his wickedness is more than what his words express; for what is uttered without is but the overflowing of that within; which was a sharp rebuke to them. For if that which was spoken by them were so evil, consider how evil must be the root from whence it sprung. And this happens naturally; for oftentimes the hesitating tongue does not suddenly pour forth all its evil, while the heart, to which none other is privy, begets whatsoever evil it will, without fear; for it has little fear of God. But when the multitude of the evils which are within is increased, the things which had been hidden then burst forth through the mouth. This is that He says, Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.
Thus He holds them in a syllogism which the Greeks call 'Aphycton,' the unavoidable; which shuts in the person questioned on both sides, and presses him with either horn. If, He saith, the Devil be evil, he cannot do good works; so that if the works you see be good, it follows that the Devil was not the agent thereof. For it cannot be that good should come of evil, or evil of good.
What He says, The good man out of the good treasure of his heart, & c. is either pointed against the Jews, that seeing they blasphemed God, what treasure in their heart must that be out of which such blasphemy proceeded; or it is connected with what had gone before, that like as a good man cannot bring forth evil things, nor an evil man good things, so Christ cannot do evil works, nor the Devil good works.
(Verse 34.) Brood of vipers, how can you speak good when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. It reveals that they are a bad tree, producing fruit of blasphemy, which have the seeds of the devil.
“O worst of men,” he says, “you have not shrunk from any wickedness of vipers. So it is not surprising that you utter nothing good. For words follow the disposition of the soul. How can you speak good, when you are evil?”
A brother asked Poemen about the words, ‘Do not render evil for evil’ (1 Thess. 5:15). He said to him, ‘The passions work in four stages: first in the heart, then in the face, third in words, fourth in deeds – and it is in deeds that it is essential not to render evil for evil. If you purify your heart, passion will not show in your expression, but if it does, take care not to speak about it; if you do speak, cut the conversation short in case you render evil for evil.’
(Dial. iv. 39.) Hence we may gather that there are some sins that are remitted in this world, and some in the world to come; for what is denied of one sin, must be supposed to be admitted of others. And this may be believed in the case of trifling faults; such as much idle discourse, immoderate laughter, or the sin of carefulness in our worldly affairs, which indeed can hardly be managed without sin even by one who knows how he ought to avoid sin; or sins through ignorance (if they be lesser sins) which burden us even after death, if they have not been remitted to us while yet in this life. But it should be known that none will there obtain any purgation even of the least sin, but he who by good actions has merited the same in this life.
Or the words, Generation of vipers, may be taken as signifying children, or imitators of the Devil, because they had wilfully spoken against good works, which is of the Devil, and thence follows, Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. That man speaks out of the abundance of the heart who is not ignorant with what intention his words are uttered; and to declare his meaning more openly He adds, A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth good things. The treasure of the heart is the intention of the thoughts, by which the Judge judges that work which is produced, so that sometimes though the outward work that is shown seem great, yet because of the carelessness of a cold heart, they receive a little reward from the Lord.
Look, He says, you who are evil trees bear evil fruit when you speak ill of Me. And I also, if I were evil, would bring forth evil fruit and not these miracles. He calls them "brood of vipers" because they boasted of Abraham. He shows that they are not of Abraham, but of ancestors worthy of their own wickedness.
Continue studying Matthew 12:34 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Jesus calls his accusers a brood of vipers, because the mouth speaks out of what fills the heart, and their hearts are evil.
“O generation of vipers,”
Offspring of poisonous snakes, the words John the Baptist used.
“how can ye, being evil, speak good things?”
A question that expects no answer, because evil hearts produce evil words.
“for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.”
The mouth gives voice to whatever fills the heart.
Passage studyMatthew 12:22–37
By the Spirit of God, the Kingdom Has Come
Summary
A man who is blind, dumb and possessed with a devil is brought to Jesus, and Jesus heals him so completely that he both speaks and sees. The crowd begins to wonder whether Jesus is the son of David. The Pharisees answer that he casts out devils by Beelzebub, the prince of the devils. Jesus, knowing their thoughts, shows that Satan would be destroying his own kingdom if he cast out Satan, that their own exorcists will judge them, and that he drives out devils by the Spirit of God, which means the kingdom of God has come. He has bound the strong man and is taking back the people Satan held. Then he warns that every person stands either with him or against him, that blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven, and that the words people speak come out of their hearts and will be judged.
A blind and dumb man set free
Matthew sets this healing in a chapter of rising conflict (Matthew 12). Jesus has defended his disciples for plucking grain on the Sabbath and healed a man with a withered hand in the synagogue, and both have hardened the Pharisees against him (Matthew 12:1–14). Matthew then applies Isaiah’s servant prophecy to Jesus, “I will put my spirit upon him” (Matthew 12:18), which prepares for what Jesus says in verse 28 about casting out devils “by the Spirit of God”.
The man is “possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb”. The verb daimonízomai means to be under the power of a demon, and in this man that bondage showed itself in his body. Typhlós is the ordinary word for blind, which Strong’s explains from a word for opaque, as if smoky. Kōphós means unable to speak, and the word often covers deafness as well. People in that day often linked such afflictions with sin or with demons, and Jesus corrected the easy link between sickness and sin in the case of the man born blind (John 9:1–3). In this case the verse itself joins the blindness and dumbness to the possession, and all three end together when Jesus heals him, so they are rightly read as the devil’s work in this one man.
Matthew says simply “he healed him”, with the verb therapeúō, which here covers the whole deliverance: the devil driven out and the senses restored. “Insomuch that” (hṓste) gives the result, and the man who had been blind and dumb “both spake and saw”. The healing was immediate, complete and public.
Matthew has already told of a dumb man possessed with a devil who was brought to Jesus (Matthew 9:32–34), and Luke tells this healing together with the dispute that follows (Luke 11:14–23). Isaiah had promised a day when “the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped. Then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing” (Isaiah 35:5–6), and here two of those signs happen to one man in a moment. Peter later summed up the ministry of Jesus in the same terms: God anointed him “with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him” (Acts 10:38).
What Jesus did for this man’s eyes and tongue he does for the hearts of his people. He came to set captives free (Luke 4:18–19). God has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of his glory in the face of Jesus Christ (2 Corinthians 4:6), and he has called us out of darkness into his marvellous light, to show forth his praises (1 Peter 2:9).
“Is not this the son of David?”
The crowd, the óchlos or common people, “were amazed”. Exístēmi means to be put out of one’s wits, astounded, almost beside oneself. Their question opens in Greek with mḗti, which makes it tentative, the question of people who hardly dare to say what they half suspect.
Son of David (huiós, “son”, with Dabíd, “David”) was a royal and messianic title. God promised David a descendant whose throne and kingdom he would establish for ever (2 Samuel 7:12–16), and Isaiah foretold a child who would reign on David’s throne with a government that would keep on growing (Isaiah 9:6–7). Two blind men had already cried, “Thou son of David, have mercy on us” (Matthew 9:27), and the crowds would hail him by this name as he rode into Jerusalem (Matthew 21:9). Many in that day, under Roman rule, hoped for a political or military deliverer, so the people may have pictured something smaller than the truth.
Their guess was right all the same. Jesus is David’s descendant, as the genealogies of Matthew 1:1 and Luke 3:31 show, and his kingdom is greater than any earthly throne, for he said, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). God has delivered us from the power of darkness into the kingdom of his dear Son (Colossians 1:13–14), and every knee will bow to him (Philippians 2:9–11).
The crowd’s wonder sets up the contrast that follows. Ordinary people, moved by what they saw, begin to ask the right question, while the religious leaders who saw the same miracle turn against him.
The charge: “by Beelzebub the prince of the devils”
“But” (dé, a connective that here marks the contrast) turns from the crowd to the Pharisees. What they heard was the people’s question, and it threatened them. They were a strict party devoted to the law of Moses and their traditions, with great influence among the people, and they had already clashed with Jesus over the Sabbath.
They have to admit the miracle, and their own words grant it, because they use the plain verb for driving out devils, ekbállō, “to throw out” or “drive out”, whose prefix gives the direction “out”. So they explain it another way: “This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.” The word “fellow” is supplied by the KJV, and the contempt is in their dismissive “this”.
Beelzebub, in Greek Beelzeboúl, is a name connected with Baal-zebub, the god of Ekron whom King Ahaziah sent to consult (2 Kings 1:2). Strong’s calls the Greek name of Chaldee origin and a parody, rendering it “dung-god”, and it is also explained as “lord of the flies” or “lord of the high dwelling”. By the time of Jesus it named the chief of the demons, and Jesus answers in verse 26 as if it were another name for Satan. To say that Jesus worked by Beelzebub was to call him an agent of the prince of evil, the gravest charge they could bring. Mark tells of the scribes making the same accusation (Mark 3:22–30), Luke says that “some of them said, He casteth out devils through Beelzebub”, and in John’s Gospel the Jews call Jesus a Samaritan who has a devil (John 8:48).
By calling good evil, the Pharisees credit Satan with the work of God’s Spirit, and it is this charge that leads Jesus to his warning about blasphemy against the Holy Ghost in verses 31 and 32.
A kingdom divided against itself
“Jesus knew their thoughts.” The verb eídō properly means to see, and so to know, and enthýmēsis means deliberation, the plans being turned over in the mind. Jesus answers what they are thinking as well as what they have said. Searching the heart belongs to the LORD (Jeremiah 17:10), and the Gospels show Jesus doing it again and again (Matthew 9:4, Luke 6:8).
He answers with something everyone knows. Merízō is to part or divide, and in the passive here it pictures a thing split against itself. Erēmóō is to lay waste or make desolate, and hístēmi is to stand or remain firm. The examples come closer to home as they go, from a kingdom to a city to a household, and the rule holds for each. Civil war ruins a nation, feuding brings down a city, and strife breaks a family apart.
Then he applies it to Satan. The name Satanâs came into Greek from the Aramaic and means the adversary. Basileía, from the word for king, is royal rule and the realm it governs, here the dominion of Satan and the demons under him. Jesus takes the Pharisees’ claim and follows it to its end. If Satan were driving out his own servants, he would be tearing down his own rule, and every ruler works to keep his kingdom. The charge is absurd, so the power at work in Jesus must come from God.
Does Satan really have a kingdom?
Jesus speaks of “his kingdom” as something real. He calls Satan “the prince of this world” (John 12:31), and Paul calls him “the god of this world” (2 Corinthians 4:4). His realm is united in its opposition to God, which is why it holds together against Jesus. It is a created, rebellious realm under God’s sovereign power, and it ends when the devil is cast into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:10). Its downfall comes by the greater power of God.
The house divided and the church
The rule Jesus states reaches beyond this argument. Paul counts divisions among the works of the flesh (Galatians 5:19–21), tells believers to mark and avoid those who cause them (Romans 16:17–18), and appeals to the church to be of one mind (1 Corinthians 1:10). He urges believers to keep “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:1–3) under Christ, who is head over all things to the church (Ephesians 1:22–23), and Jesus prayed that his people “may be one, even as we are one” (John 17:20–23). The same is true of a single heart, which stands firm only when it is whole in its devotion to Christ.
“By whom do your children cast them out?”
Jesus’ second answer turns the charge back on his accusers. The “if” (ei) sets up an argument from their own premise. “Your children” (hymōn, “your”, with huiós, “sons”) means Jewish exorcists of their own circle, perhaps their disciples. Exorcism was practised among the Jews in that day by prayers, incantations or the use of names such as Solomon’s, and the historian Josephus tells of it. The sons of Sceva in Acts were Jewish exorcists of this kind, and the evil spirit they tried to drive out overpowered them (Acts 19:13–16).
The Pharisees let these men work unaccused. If they condemn Jesus for driving out devils (daimónion, the usual word for an evil spirit) and approve the same act in their own people, their verdict on him rests on prejudice. “Therefore they shall be your judges.” A kritḗs is one who judges, and the Pharisees’ own exorcists stand as witnesses against the men who condemn Jesus.
“The kingdom of God is come unto you”
Now Jesus says what is really happening. Pneûma means breath or wind, and so a spirit. Here it is the Spirit of God, who came upon Jesus at his baptism (Matthew 3:16) and of whom Isaiah’s prophecy said, “I will put my spirit upon him”. Luke gives the saying as “if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you” (Luke 11:20).
The verb phthánō means to come before, and to reach or arrive at. Here it says that the kingdom has already arrived and is present among the very people Jesus is speaking to. The basileía of God is his royal rule in action. Matthew usually writes “kingdom of heaven”, and “kingdom of God” appears in his Gospel only here and in Matthew 6:33, 19:24, 21:31 and 21:43.
So every devil cast out is a sign that God’s reign has broken into the world and is driving back the rule of Satan. Jesus had preached from the start, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel” (Mark 1:15), and here that kingdom is at work in front of his hearers. John says the Son of God was manifested to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:8). Daniel foresaw a kingdom set up by the God of heaven which shall never be destroyed (Daniel 2:44), Jesus says elsewhere that the kingdom of God is within you (Luke 17:20–21), and Paul says that Christ must reign until every enemy is under his feet, with death the last to be destroyed (1 Corinthians 15:25–26). The kingdom that came with Jesus will be complete when the kingdoms of this world become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ (Revelation 11:15).
Binding the strong man
Jesus’ third picture is a raid on a house. The strong man (ischyrós, mighty, powerful) is Satan, his house is the realm where he holds people, and his goods (skeuē) are the people he holds captive through sin, spiritual blindness and demonic oppression. To bind (déō) is to tie him up so he can resist no longer, and to spoil (diarpázō) is to plunder what he had.
So when Jesus sets a man free from a devil, he is plundering Satan’s house, and that can only happen if Satan has first been overpowered by someone stronger. Jesus is Satan’s conqueror. Isaiah had promised that even the captives of the mighty would be taken away (Isaiah 49:24–25), and Jesus told his disciples that he had seen Satan fall as lightning from heaven, and gave them power over all the power of the enemy (Luke 10:18–19).
The full binding and spoiling came through his death and resurrection. God promised at the fall that the seed of the woman would bruise the serpent’s head (Genesis 3:15). On the cross Christ “spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it” (Colossians 2:15). Now all power in heaven and in earth is given to him (Matthew 28:18), and he goes on spoiling Satan’s house as people are turned from darkness to light (Acts 26:18).
Does this mean Satan has no power left?
Satan is bound in the sense that his hold is broken and he is limited by God’s purposes, and he still deceives, tempts and oppresses. Paul says we wrestle against principalities and powers (Ephesians 6:12), and James tells believers to resist the devil, with the promise that he will flee (James 4:7). We face him as a defeated enemy, under the authority of the One who has already bound him.
With him or against him
In the middle of this conflict Jesus says that every person stands either with him or against him. Katá with “me” means against, in opposition. Synágō is to gather or bring together, and skorpízō is to scatter, disperse or put to flight. The second line says the first again in a picture. A shepherd gathers his flock and keeps it safe, and scattered sheep are lost and in danger, as when the shepherd is struck and the sheep are scattered (Zechariah 13:7). Israel’s hope of the Messiah included the gathering of God’s scattered people. Luke records the same saying in this same dispute.
Jesus is the true gatherer. He was given as a light to the Gentiles (Isaiah 49:6), he always did what pleased the Father (John 8:29), and by his blood he has redeemed people out of every nation (Revelation 5:9). He builds his church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (Matthew 16:18). At the end the nations will be gathered before him and separated as sheep from goats (Matthew 25:31–46). Joshua once set a choice like this before Israel: “choose you this day whom ye will serve” (Joshua 24:15).
Is everyone outside Christ his enemy?
Jesus first spoke these words to Pharisees who were openly fighting his work, and they reach everyone, because whoever stands outside his kingdom is on the other side, even where there is little open hostility. John says, “he that believeth not is condemned already” (John 3:18). The gospel calls people across to Christ’s side through faith and repentance, and being with him means taking part in his gathering.
The blasphemy against the Holy Ghost
“Wherefore” ties this warning to what the Pharisees have just said, and the warning opens with mercy. “All manner of sin and blasphemy” covers every kind of offence, including evil speaking against God, and aphíēmi, “forgive”, is to send away or release, here to release from the penalty of sin. The blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7), for he is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).
Blasphēmía is evil speaking or slander, especially against God. Against the Holy Ghost (pneûma, the word for the Spirit of God in verse 28) it is the one sin Jesus names as beyond forgiveness. Verse 32 says it again with a contrast. Épō is simply to speak or say. Aiṓn is an age, and with méllō, “to come”, the phrase follows the common Jewish way of speaking of this present age and the age to come. The sentence reaches into eternity.
Mark gives the reason Jesus said it: “Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit” (Mark 3:30). Luke records the saying as well (Luke 12:10).
What is the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost?
It is the deliberate, settled and malicious rejection of the Holy Spirit’s plain witness to Jesus, and calling the Spirit’s work the work of Satan is the example in front of us. The Pharisees saw a man freed from a devil by the Spirit of God, could find no way to deny it, and credited it to Satan. This is a heart hardened against the very One who brings people to repentance, the Spirit who convicts the world of sin and glorifies Christ (John 16:8–14). Because it refuses the only way forgiveness comes, it leaves the sinner without a way back. God’s mercy is wide enough for every other sin, and the one who blasphemes the Spirit has shut himself away from it. Hebrews speaks with the same gravity of those who have tasted the heavenly gift and fallen away, and of sinning wilfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth (Hebrews 6:4–6, Hebrews 10:26–31).
Why can a word against the Son of man be forgiven?
“Son of man” is Jesus’ name for himself in his humble, earthly state, when his glory was veiled and people could misunderstand him. Those who spoke against him in ignorance, or even opposed him then, could still repent and be forgiven. The Spirit’s work in this healing was open for all to see, and to call it Satan’s work was to reject God’s clearest witness to his Son.
Can someone who fears they have committed it be forgiven?
Whoever is troubled about this sin and longs for God’s forgiveness shows by that longing that the Spirit is still at work in them. The sin Jesus describes belongs to a heart so hardened that it has lost all wish to repent. Those who are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God (Romans 8:14), and though a believer can grieve the Spirit (Ephesians 4:30) and fall into sin, the settled, malicious rejection Jesus warns of is contrary to the new heart the Spirit gives. Scripture leaves unstated in so many words whether a true believer could commit it, and the nature of the sin itself answers the fear.
The tree is known by his fruit
Jesus now turns from the deed to the hearts of the men who slandered it. Kalós, good, is the word Strong’s describes as good for appearance or use, as distinguished from agathós, good in itself, so it suits a tree whose goodness shows in what it bears. Saprós is rotten or worthless, and ginṓskō is to know or recognise. In this setting the saying answers the charge of verse 24 directly. The fruit was a man set free from a devil, which is good, so the one who did it must be good. At the same time the Pharisees’ own fruit, their slander, shows what kind of tree they are. Jesus taught in the Sermon on the Mount that false prophets are known by their fruits (Matthew 7:15–20), and Luke records the tree and its fruit as well (Luke 6:43–45).
“O generation of vipers”
Génnēma means offspring, and échidna is an adder or other poisonous snake, so Jesus calls them a brood of snakes, men whose words carry poison. John the Baptist had used the same words (Matthew 3:7), and Jesus’ fullest rebuke of the scribes and Pharisees comes later (Matthew 23). “Being evil” (ponērós), they have only evil to bring out, and any good word (agathós) from them would be a mask. The reason follows: perísseuma is abundance or surplus, what fills the heart until it comes out of the mouth. The kardía in Scripture is the centre of a person, the seat of mind, will and moral character as well as feeling, and Proverbs says to keep it with all diligence, “for out of it are the issues of life” (Proverbs 4:23).
The treasure of the heart
Thēsaurós, from the verb to put or place, is a storehouse or the valuables kept in it. The heart is pictured as a store, and what has been laid up there is what comes out. “Bringeth forth” is ekbállō again, the verb used for casting out devils in verses 24 to 28, here in its plain sense of bringing something out. A man’s words and deeds show what is in his store. “The LORD looketh on the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7).
This reaches every one of us. The heart is deceitful above all things (Jeremiah 17:9), and since sin entered the world by one man all have inherited a sinful nature (Romans 5:12), so the natural heart lays up evil treasure. Good treasure comes from God’s work in us. He promised a new heart and a new spirit (Ezekiel 36:26), and whoever is in Christ is a new creature (2 Corinthians 5:17). The inward man is renewed day by day (2 Corinthians 4:16), the Spirit bears his fruit in us (Galatians 5:22–23), and God conforms us to the image of his Son (Romans 8:29), filling us with the fruits of righteousness (Philippians 1:11). Jesus said, “I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing” (John 15:5).
Does this mean good works save us?
Good fruit is the evidence of a heart God has changed, and salvation is by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9). The fruit shows what the tree is, and it is God who makes the tree good.
Every idle word
Argós, idle, is made from a negative prefix and the word for work, and means inactive, idle or useless. It is the word for the labourers “standing idle in the marketplace” (Matthew 20:3). An idle word is careless, empty speech, spoken without thought for its truth or its effect. Rhēma is a word or saying, something actually spoken, and “every” leaves none out. “Give account” joins lógos, which can mean a reckoning, with apodídōmi, to render what is due. The Pharisees’ deliberate slander was grave, and Jesus carries the point further: even careless words come under God’s judgment, because they too come out of the heart. That judgment weighs our speech as a whole, as the overflow of who we are before God.
Solomon says that God shall bring every work into judgment (Ecclesiastes 12:14), and Paul that every one of us shall give account of himself to God (Romans 14:12). “Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof” (Proverbs 18:21). James calls the tongue “an unruly evil, full of deadly poison” and asks whether one fountain can send out both salt water and fresh (James 3:6–12). Paul tells believers to speak what builds others up (Ephesians 4:29).
Verse 37 gives the reason with “For” (gár). “By” translates ek, “out of” or “from”, so the verdict is drawn from the words, and kaí, “and”, sets the two outcomes side by side. Lógos here is the sum of a person’s speech. Dikaióō is to declare or show just, to acquit, and katadikázō is to pronounce guilty. This is the language of a court, and our words are the evidence.
Are we justified by our words?
We are “justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus” (Romans 3:24), and our words are the evidence of the heart he has given. Since the mouth speaks out of the heart, words show whether a heart has been made new by grace or remains in rebellion. Our own words would condemn us, but Christ bore our sins in his own body on the tree (1 Peter 2:24), and there is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus (Romans 8:1). The Father has committed all judgment to the Son (John 5:22), so the One who will weigh our words is the One who justifies us.
The Lord Who Binds, Gathers and Speaks Life
In this passage Jesus stands over every power that holds people captive. The devil who blinded and silenced a man has to leave at his word, because the Spirit of God is upon him and the kingdom of God has come with him. He has bound the strong man, and on the cross he triumphed over all the powers of darkness. He gathers a people for himself, and he holds out forgiveness for every kind of sin and blasphemy.
He is also the one whose words were always good, because his heart was always good. He is the Word who was with God and was God (John 1:1), who became flesh, full of grace and truth (John 1:14). He taught as one having authority (Matthew 7:29), his words are spirit and life (John 6:63), and Peter could say to him, “thou hast the words of eternal life” (John 6:68). In him our hearts are made new, and our speech begins to bear his likeness: truth spoken in love (Ephesians 4:15), speech seasoned with grace (Colossians 4:6), and words spoken as the oracles of God (1 Peter 4:11). The man in verse 22 was given back his sight and his voice, and the same Lord gives his people eyes to see who he is and mouths to praise him.
Matthew 12:22
“Then was brought unto him”
Others brought the man, people who cared for him and had heard that Jesus healed.
“one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb:”
Three afflictions in one man, all from one cause, the devil that held him (daimonízomai).
“and he healed him,”
One verb covers both the casting out and the cure. Jesus dealt with the cause and its effects together.
“insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw.”
The proof was there for everyone to hear and see, and it is what moved the crowd to ask its question.
Matthew 12:23
“And all the people were amazed,”
The whole crowd shared the astonishment, the common people (óchlos) as distinct from their leaders.
“and said,”
Their wonder turned into speech, and it was this speech that the Pharisees heard.
“Is not this the son of David?”
A tentative question, hoping and doubting at once. It asks whether this healer is the promised King.
Matthew 12:24
“But when the Pharisees heard it,”
“It” is the crowd’s question about the son of David, which threatened their standing.
“they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils,”
Their words are a verdict, and they grant that the devils really are cast out.
“but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.”
“By” means through the agency of. They call Jesus the servant of the ruler of the demons.
Matthew 12:25
“And Jesus knew their thoughts,”
He answers their hidden reasoning (enthýmēsis) as well as their words.
“and said unto them,”
He answers openly, to their faces.
“Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation;”
Inner conflict lays a kingdom waste.
“and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:”
The same holds for a city and for a household or family.
Matthew 12:26
“And if Satan cast out Satan,”
Jesus takes the Pharisees’ charge at its word. Satan is named twice because the charge would set him against himself.
“he is divided against himself;”
The Greek is literally “against himself” (eph’ heautón), Satan at war with Satan.
“how shall then his kingdom stand?”
A question that answers itself. It cannot stand, so the charge collapses.
Matthew 12:27
“And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils,”
Jesus repeats their accusation to test it, granting it for the sake of argument.
“by whom do your children cast them out?”
Their own exorcists did the same kind of work, and the Pharisees accepted it.
“therefore they shall be your judges.”
Their own people will show up the bias of their judgment on Jesus.
Matthew 12:28
“But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God,”
The “if” carries the force of “since”. This is the true source of his power.
“then the kingdom of God is come unto you.”
“Unto you”: the kingdom has reached the very men who are opposing it.
Matthew 12:29
“Or else how can one enter into a strong man’s house,”
The house is Satan’s realm, where he holds people captive.
“and spoil his goods,”
The goods are people, and spoiling them means setting them free.
“except he first bind the strong man?”
“First”: the binding comes before the plundering, so every deliverance shows that Satan has already been overpowered.
“and then he will spoil his house.”
Once the strong man is bound, the rescue of his captives follows.
Matthew 12:30
“He that is not with me is against me;”
Every person stands on one side or the other of Jesus.
“and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.”
The same truth in a shepherd’s picture. Whoever is outside Christ’s work of gathering adds to the scattering.
Matthew 12:31
“Wherefore I say unto you,”
Jesus speaks on his own authority, drawing the conclusion of all he has just said.
“All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men:”
The future “shall be forgiven” is a promise of God’s readiness to pardon.
“but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.”
The one exception: the deliberate rejection of the Spirit’s witness to Jesus, of which calling his work Satan’s is the example here.
Matthew 12:32
“And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him:”
Even opposition to Jesus in his humble state could be repented of and forgiven.
“but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him,”
Speaking against the Spirit is the blasphemy of verse 31 put another way.
“neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”
This age and the age to come (aiṓn): the unforgiveness is final.
Matthew 12:33
“Either make the tree good, and his fruit good;”
Good fruit comes from a good tree, so the good work of setting a man free must come from a good source.
“or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt:”
The same rule from the other side. A rotten tree bears rotten fruit.
“for the tree is known by his fruit.”
What a tree is shows in what it bears, and the same is true of a person.
Matthew 12:34 This verse
“O generation of vipers,”
Offspring of poisonous snakes, the words John the Baptist used.
“how can ye, being evil, speak good things?”
A question that expects no answer, because evil hearts produce evil words.
“for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.”
The mouth gives voice to whatever fills the heart.
Matthew 12:35
“A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things:”
The heart is a storehouse (thēsaurós), and a good store yields good things in word and deed.
“and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.”
The same rule for an evil store. What comes out shows what was laid up.
Matthew 12:36
“But I say unto you,”
A solemn word on Jesus’ own authority.
“That every idle word that men shall speak,”
“Every” leaves none out, and “idle” means careless, useless speech, with or without malice.
“they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.”
A reckoning is coming, in the day when God judges all people.
Matthew 12:37
“For by thy words thou shalt be justified,”
“Thy” turns the saying from all people to each one. Words from a renewed heart are evidence of the righteousness God gives.
“and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.”
Words from an evil heart are evidence of guilt, as the Pharisees’ words were.
Last revised