- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 25:23–38. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. A law concerning the real estates of the Israelites in the land of Canaan, and the transferring of them. 1. No land should be sold for ever from the family to whose lot it fell in the division of the land. And the reason given is, The land is mine, and you are strangers and sojourners with me, Lev 25:23. (1.) God having a particular propriety in this land, he would by this restraint keep them sensible of it. The possessions of good people, who, having given up themselves to God, have therewith given up all they have to him, are in a particular manner at his disposal, and his disposal of them must be submitted to. (2.) They being strangers and sojourners with him in that land, and having his tabernacle among them, to alienate their part of that land would be in effect to cut themselves off from their fellowship and communion with God, of which that was a token and symbol, for which reason Naboth would rather incur the wrath of a king than part with the inheritance of his fathers, Kg1 21:3. 2. If a man was constrained through poverty to sell his land for the subsistence of his family, yet, if afterwards he was able, he might redeem it before the year of jubilee (Lev 25:24, Lev 25:26, Lev 25:27), and the price must be settled according to the number of years since the sale and before the jubilee. 3. If the person himself was not able to redeem it, his next kinsman might (Lev 25:25): The redeemer thereof, he that is near unto him, shall come and shall redeem, so it might be read. The kinsman is called Goel, the redeemer (Num 5:8; Rut 3:9), to whom belonged the right of redeeming the land. And this typified Christ, who assumed our nature, that he might be our kinsman, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, and, being the only kinsman we have that is able to do it, to him belonged the right of redemption. As for all our other kinsmen, their shoe must be plucked off (Rut 4:6, Rut 4:7); they cannot redeem. But Christ can and hath redeemed the inheritance which we by sin had forfeited and alienated, and made a new settlement of it upon all that by faith become allied to him. We know that this Redeemer liveth, Job 19:25. And some make this duty of the kinsman to signify the brotherly love that should be among Christians, inclining them to recover those that are fallen, and to restore them with the spirit of meekness. 4. If the land was not redeemed before the year of jubilee, then it should return of course to him that had sold or mortgaged it: In the jubilee it shall go out, Lev 25:28. This was a figure of the free grace of God towards us in Christ, by which, and not by any price or merit of our own, we are restored to the favour of God, and become entitled to paradise, from which our first parents, and we in them, were expelled for disobedience. 5. A difference was made between houses in walled cities, and lands in the country, or houses in country villages. Houses in walled cities were more the fruits of their own industry than land in the country, which was the immediate gift of God's bounty; and therefore, if a man sold a house in a city, he might redeem it any time within a year after the sale, but otherwise it was confirmed to the purchaser for ever, and should not return, no, not at the year of the jubilee, Lev 25:29, Lev 25:30. This provision was made to encourage strangers and proselytes to come and settle among them. Though they could not purchase land in Canaan to them and their heirs, yet they might purchase houses in walled cities, which would be most convenient for those who were supposed to live by trade. But country houses could be disposed of no otherwise than as lands might. 6. A clause is added in favour of the Levites, by way of exception from these rules. (1.) Dwelling houses in the cities of the Levites might be redeemed at any time, and, if not redeemed, should revert in the year of jubilee (Lev 25:32, Lev 25:33), because the Levites had no other possessions than cities and their suburbs, and God would show that the Levites were his peculiar care; and it was for the interest of the public that they should not be impoverished, or wormed out of their inheritances. (2.) The fields adjoining to their cities (Num 35:4, Num 35:5) might not be sold at any time, for they belonged, not to particular Levites, but to the city of the Levites, as a corporation, who could not alienate without a wrong to their tribe; therefore, if any of those fields were sold, the bargain was void, Lev 25:34. Even the Egyptians took care to preserve the land of the priests, Gen 47:22. And there is no less reason for the taking of the maintenance of the gospel ministry under the special protection of Christian governments.
II.A law for the relief of the poor, and the tender usage of poor debtors, and these are of more general and perpetual obligation than the former.
1.The poor must be relieved, Lev 25:35. Here is,
(1.)Our brother's poverty and distress supposed: If thy brother be waxen poor; not only thy brother by nation as a Jew, but thy brother by nature as a man, for it follows, though he be a stranger or a sojourner. All men are to be looked upon and treated as brethren, for we have all one Father, Mal 2:10. Though he is poor, yet still he is thy brother, and is to be loved and owned as a brother. Poverty does not destroy the relation. Though a son of Abraham, yet he may wax poor and fall into decay. Note, Poverty and decay are great grievances, and very common: The poor you have always with you.
(2.)Our duty enjoined: Thou shalt relieve him. By sympathy, pitying the poor; by service, doing for them; and by supply, giving to them according to their necessity and thy ability.
2.Poor debtors must not be oppressed: If thy brother be waxen poor, and have occasion to borrow money of thee for the necessary support of his family, take thou no usury of him, either for money or victuals, Lev 25:36, Lev 25:37. And thus far this law binds still, but could never be thought binding where money is borrowed for purchase of lands, trade, or other improvements; for there it is reasonable that the lender share with the borrower in the profit. The law here is plainly intended for the relief of the poor, to whom it is sometimes as great a charity to lend freely as to give. Observe the arguments here used against extortion. (1.) God patronizes the poor: "Fear thy God, who will reckon with thee for all injuries done to the poor: thou fearest not them, but fear him." (2.) Relieve the poor, that they may live with thee, and some way or other they may be serviceable to thee. The rich can as ill spare the hands of the poor as the poor can the purses of the rich. (3.) The same argument is used to enforce this precept that prefaces all the ten commandments: I am the Lord your God which brought you out of Egypt, Lev 25:38. Note, It becomes those that have received mercy to show mercy. If God has been gracious to us, we ought not to be rigorous with our brethren.
Continue studying Leviticus 25:35 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Leviticus 25:35, embedded within Israel's intricate social and economic legislation, establishes a profound communal responsibility to care for its most vulnerable members. This verse specifically mandates the active support and relief of a fellow Israelite who has fallen into poverty and economic decline, extending this compassionate obligation even to resident aliens—the "stranger" or "sojourner"—who dwell among them, thereby ensuring their continued survival, dignity, and integration within the covenant community. It powerfully underscores a divine imperative for social equity and mutual aid, reflecting God's character and His covenantal expectations for His people.
Context
Literary Context
Leviticus chapter 25 is a foundational text concerning Israel's economic and social structure, primarily detailing the Sabbatical Year (every seventh year) and the Year of Jubilee (every fiftieth year). These institutions were divinely designed to prevent the permanent accumulation of land and wealth by a few, ensuring that economic disparities did not become irreversible and that land would return to its original families, thereby preventing perpetual debt and servitude. Verse 35 initiates a specific section (verses 35-38) that addresses financial assistance to the poor, particularly prohibiting the charging of interest (usury) to fellow Israelites or resident aliens who have become impoverished. This immediate context demonstrates that the command to "relieve him" is not merely about charity but about establishing a just economic system where the vulnerable are protected from exploitation and enabled to recover their footing, aligning with the broader principles of land redistribution and debt cancellation found throughout Leviticus 25.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, poverty could result from various factors, including crop failure, natural disaster, illness, or oppressive debt. Without a robust social welfare system, individuals and families could quickly fall into destitution. The Israelite covenant community was intended to function as a divinely ordained safety net, distinct from surrounding cultures where the poor were often left to fend for themselves or became enslaved. Laws like Leviticus 25:35 were revolutionary in their scope, demanding that the community actively intervene to prevent permanent poverty and social decay. The explicit inclusion of the "stranger" (גֵּר, gêr) and "sojourner" (תּוֹשָׁב, tôwshâb) highlights a unique aspect of Israelite law, reflecting God's own compassion for the marginalized and His command for His people to remember their own history as sojourners in Egypt (e.g., Deuteronomy 10:19). This cultural expectation fostered a communal responsibility that transcended familial or tribal lines, extending to all who resided within the land under God's covenant.
Key Themes
Leviticus 25:35 contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Leviticus and the Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of Holiness, demonstrating that God's holiness is not merely ritual purity but also ethical righteousness, demanding justice and compassion in social interactions. It reinforces the theme of Covenantal Obligation, where the well-being of the community is intrinsically linked to its obedience to God's commands, particularly regarding the care for the vulnerable. The verse also highlights Economic Justice as a divine mandate, ensuring that the poor are not perpetually oppressed but are given opportunities for recovery and integration. Finally, it powerfully expresses the theme of Radical Inclusivity, extending the covenant's protective umbrella to non-Israelite residents, reflecting God's universal concern for all humanity and challenging His people to embody His expansive love.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term (H4134) describes a state of becoming thin or impoverished. It signifies not merely a temporary lack of resources but a process of decline, a weakening of one's economic standing that diminishes their ability to sustain themselves. The command to "relieve" such a person is therefore an intervention designed to halt this decline and restore their capacity for self-sufficiency.
The Hebrew word (H2388) is a powerful verb meaning "to fasten upon," "to seize," "to be strong," "to strengthen," or "to help." It implies a proactive, robust, and supportive action, far beyond a passive handout. To "relieve" someone in this context means to actively empower them, to provide the necessary support to help them regain their footing and stability, enabling them to "live with thee" as a contributing member of the community rather than merely surviving on its fringes.
These terms (H1616 and H8453 respectively) distinguish between different types of non-Israelite residents. A gêr was typically a resident alien who had settled more permanently among the Israelites, often adopting some aspects of their life and perhaps even their faith. A tôwshâb might be a more temporary resident or a foreigner passing through. Both groups were inherently vulnerable, lacking the tribal land inheritance and familial support structures of native Israelites. Their explicit inclusion in this compassionate command underscores the expansive nature of God's concern for all who dwell in the land, regardless of their ethnic or national origin, and challenges the community to extend radical hospitality.
Verse Breakdown
"And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee;"
This opening clause establishes the condition that triggers the divine command. It refers to a fellow Israelite (or by extension, anyone in the covenant community) who experiences severe economic hardship, specifically "waxing poor" (H4134, becoming impoverished) and "falling in decay" (H4131, losing their economic stability or ability to sustain themselves). The phrase "with thee" emphasizes their proximity and shared community, highlighting that their decline is visible and impacts the collective well-being of the entire society.
"then thou shalt relieve him:"
This is the direct, imperative command from God. Building on the meaning of châzaq (H2388), it dictates an active, strengthening intervention. The responsibility falls upon the individual Israelite or the community as a whole to provide tangible support, not merely sympathy. This support is intended to prevent total collapse and facilitate recovery, demonstrating the ethical demands of the covenant.
"[yea, though he be] a stranger, or a sojourner;"
This crucial parenthetical phrase expands the scope of the command beyond ethnic Israelites to include resident aliens (H1616, H8453). It demonstrates God's universal compassion and His expectation that His people reflect this inclusivity. The inherent vulnerability of these non-native residents made them particularly susceptible to exploitation, and this clause explicitly protects them, ensuring they are not overlooked or mistreated within the covenant community.
"that he may live with thee."
This final clause articulates the ultimate purpose and desired outcome of the command. The goal is not merely survival, but the restoration of the impoverished individual or alien to a state where they can "live with thee" (H2416, H3027)—meaning to thrive, participate, and maintain their dignity within the community. It speaks to social integration and the preservation of communal harmony, ensuring that no one is permanently marginalized or cast out due to economic misfortune, reflecting God's desire for a flourishing society.
Literary Devices
Leviticus 25:35 effectively employs several literary devices to convey its profound message. It serves as a clear example of Legal Statute, establishing a foundational principle for how the Israelite community should interact with its economically vulnerable members. The explicit command ("then thou shalt relieve him") is a direct Imperative, leaving no room for ambiguity regarding the expected action. The inclusion of "a stranger, or a sojourner" demonstrates Inclusivity as a core tenet of the law, broadening the scope of communal responsibility beyond ethnic boundaries. Furthermore, the verse functions as Didacticism, teaching a fundamental moral and theological truth about God's character and His desire for justice and compassion within His covenant people. It is a microcosm of Ethical Monotheism, where the nature of God (just, compassionate) directly informs and demands ethical behavior from His worshipers, illustrating that true worship extends to social responsibility.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Leviticus 25:35 is deeply rooted in the theological understanding of God's character as compassionate and just, and His covenant with Israel, which called for a society reflecting His righteousness. The command to relieve the poor and the resident alien is not merely a social policy but a theological imperative, demonstrating that true worship of YHWH involves tangible acts of love and justice towards one's neighbor. This principle of mutual responsibility and care for the vulnerable is a recurring theme throughout the Old Testament, emphasizing that economic well-being is tied to spiritual faithfulness and communal health. It highlights God's concern for the marginalized and His desire for a society where no one is left to perish in poverty, reflecting the very heart of God's covenant relationship with His people.
Reflection and Application
Leviticus 25:35 transcends its ancient context, offering timeless principles for contemporary believers and communities. It challenges us to move beyond passive sympathy to active, strengthening intervention for those experiencing poverty and decay around us. This means not only providing immediate relief but also seeking to empower individuals to regain their dignity and ability to thrive, enabling them to "live with" us as valued members of society. It calls for a radical embrace of inclusivity, extending compassion and practical help to all who are vulnerable, regardless of their background, recognizing that our shared humanity and Christ's call to love our neighbor know no boundaries. Ultimately, this verse reminds us that our faith is not merely private piety but is tangibly demonstrated in how we care for "the least of these," reflecting the transforming power of God's love in our actions.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does "waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee" mean in a practical sense for ancient Israel?
In ancient Israel, this phrase described someone who had experienced a significant economic downturn, losing their ability to sustain themselves or their family. This could be due to various reasons: crop failure, livestock loss, illness, natural disaster, or accumulating debt that forced them to sell off assets, including their land or even themselves into indentured servitude. "Fallen in decay" indicates a state of decline, where their economic foundation had eroded, making them dependent on the community's support to survive and prevent permanent destitution. The phrase "with thee" signifies that this person was a recognized member of the community, living alongside others, making their plight visible and the responsibility to help clear. This was not about simple charity but about preventing a complete social and economic collapse for an individual or family within the covenant community.
Why was it important for the law to explicitly include "a stranger, or a sojourner"?
The explicit inclusion of the "stranger" (גֵּר, gêr) and "sojourner" (תּוֹשָׁב, tôwshâb) was crucial because these non-native residents were particularly vulnerable. Unlike Israelites, they did not have an ancestral land inheritance or a tribal support system to fall back on in times of hardship. Without specific legal protection, they could easily be exploited, neglected, or fall into extreme poverty. By including them, God's law demonstrated a radical inclusivity and universal compassion, commanding Israel to reflect His own character. This command reinforced the idea that the covenant community's responsibility for justice and mercy extended beyond ethnic or national boundaries to all who resided within the land, ensuring that even the most marginalized were protected and could "live with" the community (see Deuteronomy 10:19). This set Israel apart from surrounding nations and highlighted God's concern for all humanity.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Leviticus 25:35 finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the Old Testament law commanded Israel to "relieve" the poor, Jesus perfectly embodied this principle, not only by ministering to the sick, feeding the hungry, and healing the broken (e.g., Matthew 14:13-21), but by identifying Himself with the most vulnerable. In His teaching on the sheep and the goats, Christ declares that acts of compassion toward "the least of these" are, in fact, acts of service to Him (e.g., Matthew 25:35-40). Furthermore, Christ, though rich, "became poor for your sake, so that you through his poverty might become rich" (2 Corinthians 8:9), demonstrating the ultimate act of self-emptying to relieve humanity from the decay of sin and spiritual poverty. Through His atoning work, He strengthens us, enabling us to "live with" God in eternal fellowship, fulfilling the spiritual intent of the law's command for communal flourishing. The New Testament church, as the body of Christ, is called to continue this ministry of relief and strengthening, extending compassion and practical aid to all, especially the "stranger" and "sojourner" in our world, reflecting the boundless love of God made manifest in Christ (e.g., Galatians 6:10).