Skip to content

Leviticus 25:37

“Laws Against Oppression and Usury”· Leviticus 25:35–38Read in context
King James Version
Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.
KJV (with Strong's)
Thou shalt not give H5414 him thy money H3701 upon usury H5392, nor lend H5414 him thy victuals H400 for increase H4768.
Complete Jewish Bible
Do not take interest when you loan him money or take a profit when you sell him food.
Berean Standard Bible
You must not lend him your silver at interest or sell him your food for profit.
American Standard Version
Thou shalt not give him thy money upon interest, nor give him thy victuals for increase.
World English Bible Messianic
You shall not lend him your money at interest, nor give him your food for profit.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thou shalt not giue him thy money to vsurie, nor lende him thy vitailes for increase.
Young's Literal Translation
thy money thou givest not to him in usury, and for increase thou givest not thy food;
Translation
In the KJVVerse 3,507 of 31,102 · 11.3%

Study this verse

Summary

Leviticus 25:37, a crucial component of God's economic and social legislation for ancient Israel, unequivocally prohibits the charging of interest on loans of money or essential provisions to a fellow Israelite. This divine command profoundly underscores God's character as the ultimate provider and owner of all resources, establishing a foundational principle for ethical financial dealings rooted in compassion, social justice, and the protection of the vulnerable within the covenant community. It stands in stark contrast to the exploitative practices prevalent in the ancient Near East, fostering a society designed for mutual support and the prevention of perpetual poverty.

Context

Literary Context

Leviticus 25 is a foundational chapter within the Mosaic Law, meticulously detailing the statutes for the Sabbatical Year (every seventh year) and the Year of Jubilee (every fiftieth year). These divinely ordained cycles were designed to prevent the permanent accumulation of wealth and land by a few, and conversely, the perpetual impoverishment of others, thereby ensuring a periodic economic and social reset within Israel. Specifically, verses 35-38 address the communal responsibility to care for an Israelite who has fallen into financial distress. The prohibition against usury in Leviticus 25:37 is a direct application of the broader principle articulated in Leviticus 25:35, which mandates supporting a struggling brother. It reinforces the theological truth that all Israelites are "sojourners and tenants" with God on His land (Leviticus 25:23), rather than absolute owners. Therefore, profiting from a fellow covenant member's misfortune through interest would violate this communal identity and undermine the very purpose of the compassionate assistance intended for their recovery.

Historical & Cultural Context

In the broader ancient Near East, the practice of charging interest on loans was not only common but also legally regulated, often leading to severe debt bondage and the exacerbation of social stratification. Empires like Babylon and Assyria had extensive legal codes, such as the Code of Hammurabi, that stipulated interest rates, yet the practice itself was an accepted part of their economic systems. Against this backdrop, God's law to Israel, as articulated in Leviticus 25, presented a revolutionary and counter-cultural economic ethic. This ethic was deeply rooted in the theological understanding that the land and its resources ultimately belonged to Yahweh, and the Israelites were merely stewards under His divine sovereignty. Consequently, exploiting a fellow Israelite's vulnerability through interest was considered a direct affront to God's ownership and His compassionate character, as well as a violation of the covenant relationship. This unique legal framework aimed to create a distinct societal model that actively resisted the cycle of perpetual poverty and fostered a communal identity founded on mutual support and divine provision, rather than individualistic gain at the expense of one's neighbor.

Key Themes

Leviticus 25:37 significantly contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Primarily, it reinforces the theme of Holiness and Separation, demonstrating how Israel was to be distinct from surrounding nations not only in worship but also in its economic and social ethics. The prohibition against usury is a practical outworking of God's call for Israel to reflect His holy character in their daily lives. Secondly, it highlights the theme of Covenant Loyalty and Social Justice. By commanding care for the poor and forbidding exploitation, God instills principles of justice and mercy that are integral to maintaining a righteous covenant community. This is further seen in passages like Deuteronomy 15:7-8. Thirdly, the verse underscores God's Sovereignty and Provision. By forbidding interest, God reminds Israel that He is their ultimate provider, and their security comes from Him, not from accumulating wealth at the expense of others. This theme is foundational to the entire Sabbatical and Jubilee system, which periodically redistributed wealth and land, ensuring that all could participate in God's provision.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Usury neshek' H5392

Derived from the root נָשַׁךְ (nashak), meaning "to bite," this term vividly portrays the insidious and destructive nature of charging interest to a needy borrower. It suggests a slow, corrosive drain or erosion of resources, much like a venomous bite that gradually weakens and incapacishes its victim. Within the covenant community, this imagery emphasizes the exploitative character of such a practice, highlighting how it "bites" into the borrower's already meager substance, making recovery more difficult and potentially leading to deeper financial distress or even debt slavery. The Strong's definition confirms it as "interest on a debt."

Increase marbîyth' H4768

From the root רָבָה (rabah), meaning "to be great, to multiply," this word refers to any "gain" or "profit" derived from a loan, whether of money or "victuals" (food, provisions). While neshek specifically denotes interest on money, marbîyth broadens the prohibition to include any form of added return on a loan of tangible goods. The Strong's definition specifies it as "specifically interest (on capital)." This comprehensive prohibition ensured that no advantage, monetary or otherwise, could be taken of a fellow Israelite's dire need, reinforcing the principle that loans to the poor within the community were acts of charity and support, not opportunities for personal enrichment or exploitation.

Verse Breakdown

"Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury"

This clause directly prohibits the charging of interest on monetary loans when the recipient is a fellow Israelite in need. The verb "give" (H5414, nâthan) here implies the act of lending or providing. The emphasis is on the vulnerable "him" – a brother who has fallen into financial distress and requires assistance. In this context, the act of lending is framed as an act of compassionate support and communal solidarity, not a commercial transaction designed for personal profit. To demand "usury" (neshek) would be to exploit their distress, compounding their hardship rather than alleviating it, thereby violating the spirit of the covenant.

"nor lend him thy victuals for increase"

This second clause extends the prohibition beyond monetary loans to include essential provisions like food and other necessities. "Victuals" (H400, ʼôkel) refers to anything necessary for sustenance. The term "increase" (marbîyth) here ensures that even if one lends grain, oil, or other foodstuffs, they are not to demand more back than what was originally lent. This prevents a form of exploitation where a person in dire need of food might be forced to repay a greater quantity, further depleting their future resources and perpetuating their poverty, thus ensuring that assistance is truly an act of mercy.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 25:37 employs powerful Metaphor through the Hebrew word neshek for "usury," which literally means "a bite." This vivid imagery likens the act of charging interest to a venomous bite, suggesting that such a practice slowly saps the life and resources from the borrower, much like a snake's venom. This metaphor effectively communicates the insidious, exploitative, and destructive nature of profiting from a fellow Israelite's misfortune within the covenant community. Furthermore, the verse utilizes Parallelism in its structure: "Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase." This balanced construction emphasizes the comprehensive nature of the prohibition, applying the principle of non-exploitation to both financial and material loans, underscoring the holistic concern for the well-being of the poor and ensuring that no loophole exists for taking advantage of a neighbor's distress.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Leviticus 25:37 is a profound expression of God's unwavering commitment to justice, compassion, and the sanctity of the covenant community. It reveals a divine economic ethic where human dignity and mutual support are prioritized over individual profit, especially when dealing with the vulnerable. The prohibition against usury is not merely a legalistic command but a practical outworking of the foundational command to "love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19:18). It serves as a constant reminder to Israel that their wealth and resources are ultimately God's, and they are called to be faithful stewards who reflect His boundless generosity and compassionate care for the marginalized. This principle stands as a testament to God's desire for a society where economic practices foster communal solidarity and prevent the perpetual cycle of poverty, rather than exacerbating it through exploitation.

Reflection and Application

Leviticus 25:37, though given within the specific context of ancient Israel, carries timeless and profound principles for believers today, challenging us to critically re-evaluate our financial practices and our approach to those in need. In a globalized economy often driven by profit maximization and self-interest, this verse calls us to embody God's compassion and justice in tangible ways. It compels us to consider whether our economic interactions, both personal and systemic, truly reflect a heart of generosity and genuine care for the vulnerable, or if they inadvertently contribute to or exploit their hardship. This might involve supporting ethical lending institutions, advocating for fair economic policies that protect the poor, or personally extending help to those in financial distress without seeking personal gain or imposing undue burdens. Ultimately, this ancient command is a call to view all our resources as belonging to God, to be stewarded in a way that honors Him by loving our neighbor as ourselves, especially those who are struggling and marginalized.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the prohibition against usury in Leviticus 25:37 challenge modern financial practices, particularly in areas like payday loans or high-interest credit, and what personal attitudes toward money and debt does it call us to cultivate?
  2. In what practical ways can individuals and communities today embody the spirit of this law, ensuring that assistance to the needy truly alleviates their burden rather than compounding it?
  3. How does recognizing God's ultimate ownership of all resources (as implied by this law and the broader context of Leviticus 25) influence our stewardship, generosity, and economic decision-making?

FAQ

Does this verse mean all interest is forbidden for Christians today?

Leviticus 25:37, along with other Old Testament passages such as Exodus 22:25, specifically prohibits charging interest (usury) to a fellow Israelite who is poor and in need. The primary context is one of compassion, social justice, and preventing exploitation within the covenant community, emphasizing that loans to the needy should be acts of charity. It was not a blanket prohibition against all interest in all contexts, as Deuteronomy 23:20 allowed charging interest to foreigners. For Christians today, while the direct legal command of the Mosaic Law does not apply in the same way it did to ancient Israel, the underlying ethical principles of justice, compassion, and non-exploitation remain profoundly relevant. This means that while modern financial systems rely on interest for their operation, believers are called to ensure their dealings are fair, avoid predatory lending practices, and prioritize helping the vulnerable over personal gain. The spirit of the law encourages generosity, ethical stewardship, and a commitment to social justice, especially towards those experiencing financial hardship, reflecting the character of God.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Leviticus 25:37, with its radical prohibition against usury to the poor, finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. While the Old Covenant law provided a framework for a just and compassionate society, it ultimately pointed forward to a greater righteousness and a more profound act of liberation that could only be achieved through Christ. Jesus, the perfect embodiment of God's love and compassion, did not merely forbid exploitation; He lived a life of radical self-giving love to the extreme. He taught His disciples to "lend, hoping for nothing in return" (Luke 6:35), elevating the Old Testament principle from a legal prohibition to a transformative call for sacrificial generosity that flows from a renewed heart. He unequivocally identified with the poor and marginalized, declaring that what is done for "one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me" (Matthew 25:40). Moreover, Christ's atoning work on the cross is the ultimate act of "lending without increase," offering salvation freely to those who are spiritually impoverished and indebted by sin, demanding nothing in return but faith and repentance (Romans 5:8). He paid the ultimate "debt" for humanity, freeing us from the bondage of sin and death, thereby fulfilling the very spirit of the law that sought to liberate the oppressed and restore dignity. Thus, the ethical demand of Leviticus 25:37 is not merely an external rule, but an internal transformation wrought by Christ, compelling believers to live out His generous, non-exploitative love in all their dealings, reflecting the Kingdom of God where justice and mercy reign supreme.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 25:23–38. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentLeviticus 25:23–38
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. A law concerning the real estates of the Israelites in the land of Canaan, and the transferring of them. 1. No land should be sold for ever from the family to whose lot it fell in the division of the land. And the reason given is, The land is mine, and you are strangers and sojourners with me, Lev 25:23. (1.) God having a particular propriety in this land, he would by this restraint keep them sensible of it. The possessions of good people, who, having given up themselves to God, have therewith given up all they have to him, are in a particular manner at his disposal, and his disposal of them must be submitted to. (2.) They being strangers and sojourners with him in that land, and having his tabernacle among them, to alienate their part of that land would be in effect to cut themselves off from their fellowship and communion with God, of which that was a token and symbol, for which reason Naboth would rather incur the wrath of a king than part with the inheritance of his fathers, Kg1 21:3. 2. If a man was constrained through poverty to sell his land for the subsistence of his family, yet, if afterwards he was able, he might redeem it before the year of jubilee (Lev 25:24, Lev 25:26, Lev 25:27), and the price must be settled according to the number of years since the sale and before the jubilee. 3. If the person himself was not able to redeem it, his next kinsman might (Lev 25:25): The redeemer thereof, he that is near unto him, shall come and shall redeem, so it might be read. The kinsman is called Goel, the redeemer (Num 5:8; Rut 3:9), to whom belonged the right of redeeming the land. And this typified Christ, who assumed our nature, that he might be our kinsman, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, and, being the only kinsman we have that is able to do it, to him belonged the right of redemption. As for all our other kinsmen, their shoe must be plucked off (Rut 4:6, Rut 4:7); they cannot redeem. But Christ can and hath redeemed the inheritance which we by sin had forfeited and alienated, and made a new settlement of it upon all that by faith become allied to him. We know that this Redeemer liveth, Job 19:25. And some make this duty of the kinsman to signify the brotherly love that should be among Christians, inclining them to recover those that are fallen, and to restore them with the spirit of meekness. 4. If the land was not redeemed before the year of jubilee, then it should return of course to him that had sold or mortgaged it: In the jubilee it shall go out, Lev 25:28. This was a figure of the free grace of God towards us in Christ, by which, and not by any price or merit of our own, we are restored to the favour of God, and become entitled to paradise, from which our first parents, and we in them, were expelled for disobedience. 5. A difference was made between houses in walled cities, and lands in the country, or houses in country villages. Houses in walled cities were more the fruits of their own industry than land in the country, which was the immediate gift of God's bounty; and therefore, if a man sold a house in a city, he might redeem it any time within a year after the sale, but otherwise it was confirmed to the purchaser for ever, and should not return, no, not at the year of the jubilee, Lev 25:29, Lev 25:30. This provision was made to encourage strangers and proselytes to come and settle among them. Though they could not purchase land in Canaan to them and their heirs, yet they might purchase houses in walled cities, which would be most convenient for those who were supposed to live by trade. But country houses could be disposed of no otherwise than as lands might. 6. A clause is added in favour of the Levites, by way of exception from these rules. (1.) Dwelling houses in the cities of the Levites might be redeemed at any time, and, if not redeemed, should revert in the year of jubilee (Lev 25:32, Lev 25:33), because the Levites had no other possessions than cities and their suburbs, and God would show that the Levites were his peculiar care; and it was for the interest of the public that they should not be impoverished, or wormed out of their inheritances. (2.) The fields adjoining to their cities (Num 35:4, Num 35:5) might not be sold at any time, for they belonged, not to particular Levites, but to the city of the Levites, as a corporation, who could not alienate without a wrong to their tribe; therefore, if any of those fields were sold, the bargain was void, Lev 25:34. Even the Egyptians took care to preserve the land of the priests, Gen 47:22. And there is no less reason for the taking of the maintenance of the gospel ministry under the special protection of Christian governments.

II.A law for the relief of the poor, and the tender usage of poor debtors, and these are of more general and perpetual obligation than the former.

1.The poor must be relieved, Lev 25:35. Here is,

(1.)Our brother's poverty and distress supposed: If thy brother be waxen poor; not only thy brother by nation as a Jew, but thy brother by nature as a man, for it follows, though he be a stranger or a sojourner. All men are to be looked upon and treated as brethren, for we have all one Father, Mal 2:10. Though he is poor, yet still he is thy brother, and is to be loved and owned as a brother. Poverty does not destroy the relation. Though a son of Abraham, yet he may wax poor and fall into decay. Note, Poverty and decay are great grievances, and very common: The poor you have always with you.

(2.)Our duty enjoined: Thou shalt relieve him. By sympathy, pitying the poor; by service, doing for them; and by supply, giving to them according to their necessity and thy ability.

2.Poor debtors must not be oppressed: If thy brother be waxen poor, and have occasion to borrow money of thee for the necessary support of his family, take thou no usury of him, either for money or victuals, Lev 25:36, Lev 25:37. And thus far this law binds still, but could never be thought binding where money is borrowed for purchase of lands, trade, or other improvements; for there it is reasonable that the lender share with the borrower in the profit. The law here is plainly intended for the relief of the poor, to whom it is sometimes as great a charity to lend freely as to give. Observe the arguments here used against extortion. (1.) God patronizes the poor: "Fear thy God, who will reckon with thee for all injuries done to the poor: thou fearest not them, but fear him." (2.) Relieve the poor, that they may live with thee, and some way or other they may be serviceable to thee. The rich can as ill spare the hands of the poor as the poor can the purses of the rich. (3.) The same argument is used to enforce this precept that prefaces all the ten commandments: I am the Lord your God which brought you out of Egypt, Lev 25:38. Note, It becomes those that have received mercy to show mercy. If God has been gracious to us, we ought not to be rigorous with our brethren.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 25:37 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8