Naar de inhoud

Leviticus 25:36

“Laws Against Oppression and Usury”· Leviticus 25:35–38Read in context
King James Version
Take thou no usury of him, or increase: but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee.
KJV (with Strong's)
Take H3947 thou no usury H5392 of him, or increase H8636: but fear H3372 thy God H430; that thy brother H251 may live H2416 with thee.
Complete Jewish Bible
Do not charge him interest or otherwise profit from him, but fear your God, so that your brother can continue living with you.
Berean Standard Bible
Do not take any interest or profit from him, but fear your God, that your countryman may live among you.
American Standard Version
Take thou no interest of him or increase, but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee.
World English Bible Messianic
Take no interest from him or profit, but fear your God; that your brother may live among you.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thou shalt take no vsurie of him, nor vantage, but thou shalt feare thy God, that thy brother may liue with thee.
Young's Literal Translation
thou takest no usury from him, or increase; and thou hast been afraid of thy God; and thy brother hath lived with thee;
Nederlands · STVE
Gij zult geen woeker noch overwinst van hem nemen; maar gij zult vrezen voor uw God, opdat uw broeder bij u leve.
Translation
In the KJVVerse 3,506 of 31,102 · 11.3%

Study this verse

Summary

Leviticus 25:36 stands as a pivotal command within Israel's covenantal legislation, specifically prohibiting the charging of interest or any form of increase on loans extended to fellow Israelites. This injunction profoundly articulates God's demand for economic justice, compassion, and communal solidarity, underscoring that financial interactions within the covenant community must be governed by mutual support and reverent obedience to God. It ensures that no member of God's people is exploited or driven to destitution, but rather enabled to maintain their livelihood and dignity alongside their brethren.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is intricately woven into the fabric of Leviticus 25, a chapter dedicated to the profound social and economic regulations of the Sabbatical Year and the Year of Jubilee. These laws, including the command for the land to lie fallow every seventh year (Leviticus 25:1-7) and the radical redistribution of land and freedom for indentured servants every fiftieth year (Leviticus 25:8-17), collectively aimed to prevent the permanent accumulation of wealth and the perpetual impoverishment of any family within Israel. The prohibition against usury in Leviticus 25:36 serves as a crucial safeguard within this system, directly addressing the potential for financial exploitation that could undermine the very equity and stability that the Sabbatical and Jubilee laws sought to establish. It reinforces the principle that all land and ultimately all people belong to God, as articulated in Leviticus 25:23.

Historical & Cultural Context

In the ancient Near East, the practice of charging interest on loans was common and often legally sanctioned, as evidenced in codes like the Code of Hammurabi. However, Israel's unique covenant relationship with Yahweh distinguished its economic ethics. Unlike surrounding nations, Israel was called to embody a distinct societal model reflecting God's character of justice, mercy, and communal care. In an agrarian society where most people lived hand-to-mouth, a loan was typically not for commercial investment but a desperate measure for survival due to unforeseen calamities like crop failure, illness, or famine. Charging interest in such circumstances would not only deepen the borrower's distress but could lead to irreversible debt, loss of land, or even the sale of oneself or one's family into indentured servitude. The command to "fear thy God" and ensure one's "brother may live with thee" directly challenged the prevailing exploitative norms, establishing a community built on mutual support and divine reverence rather than predatory gain.

Key Themes

Leviticus 25:36 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost among these is the theme of Holiness, demonstrating that God's holiness extends beyond ritual purity to encompass ethical conduct in all spheres of life, including economic transactions. It underscores Covenantal Solidarity, emphasizing that as members of God's covenant people, Israelites were bound by a unique relationship that transcended mere legal obligations, demanding care and compassion for one another. The verse also highlights Economic Justice and Equity, promoting a system designed to prevent extreme wealth disparity and ensure that all members of the community could maintain their livelihood and dignity. Finally, it reinforces the theme of God's Sovereignty and Ownership, reminding the Israelites that all their possessions, including their land and their very lives, belonged to God, and therefore, they were stewards called to manage resources in a way that honored Him and blessed their neighbors (Leviticus 25:23).

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Usury neshek' H5392

Derived from the root meaning "to bite" or "to sting," this term (H5392) metaphorically portrays the painful and exploitative nature of charging interest, especially to someone in financial distress. It implies a burdensome and harmful gain, likened to the venomous bite of a snake, which slowly drains the life out of the victim. This vividly communicates the oppressive impact of interest on the vulnerable, highlighting its destructive effect on the borrower's well-being and ability to "live."

Increase tarbîyth' H8636

From a root meaning "to multiply" or "to grow," this word (H8636) refers to any general gain or profit made from a loan, whether of money, food, or other goods. While neshek often refers specifically to monetary interest, tarbîyth broadens the prohibition to encompass any form of increment or additional charge taken from a loan to a fellow Israelite in need. This ensures that the spirit of the law, not just its letter, is upheld, preventing exploitation through various subtle means.

Fear yârêʼ' H3372

This primitive root (H3372), translated as "fear," signifies more than mere fright; it denotes a profound reverence, awe, and obedient submission to the Lord. In this context, it highlights that ethical economic conduct is not merely a social convention but a direct response to God's character and commands. It implies acknowledging God's sovereignty, His ownership over all things and all people (H430, ʼĕlôhîym, God), and trusting in His provision, rather than resorting to exploitative practices for personal gain. This "fear" is the foundational motivation for righteous living.

Verse Breakdown

"Take thou no usury of him, or increase"

This is a direct, emphatic prohibition against charging any form of interest or additional gain on a loan given to a fellow Israelite. The dual use of "usury" (neshek) and "increase" (tarbîyth) underscores the comprehensive nature of the ban, covering all types of exploitative profit from lending within the covenant community. It establishes a clear boundary for financial transactions among God's people, prioritizing their welfare over personal profit.

"but fear thy God"

This clause provides the theological and ethical motivation for obeying the prohibition. The command is not merely a legalistic rule but an ethical imperative rooted in profound reverence for God. It implies that one's economic practices are a direct reflection of one's relationship with and respect for the divine. True fear of God leads to righteous, compassionate, and just behavior towards others, recognizing God's ultimate ownership and concern for His people.

"that thy brother may live with thee"

This final clause articulates the ultimate goal and beneficial outcome of the command. The purpose of prohibiting usury is to ensure the survival, dignity, and continued well-being of the fellow Israelite ("brother," H251, ʼâch). It promotes communal solidarity, ensuring that no member of the covenant community is driven to destitution or forced out of their place due to financial hardship, but rather can "live" (H2416, chay) and thrive alongside their brethren, maintaining their place within the community.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 25:36 is concise yet powerful, employing several effective literary devices. The verse begins with a direct Imperative, "Take thou no usury," which unequivocally states the divine command and emphasizes its non-negotiable nature. This is immediately followed by a Motivation Clause, "but fear thy God," which provides the theological impetus for obedience, grounding the economic law in profound reverence for the divine. The subsequent Purpose Clause, "that thy brother may live with thee," articulates the desired social and communal outcome, highlighting the compassionate intent and beneficial consequences of adherence to the law. The Hebrew terms for "usury" (neshek, "a bite") and "increase" (tarbîyth) also employ subtle Metaphor and Synecdoche, respectively, to vividly portray the harmful, draining nature of exploitative lending and to encompass all forms of illicit gain. Together, these devices create a compelling and deeply moral statement on economic justice and communal responsibility within God's covenant people.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Leviticus 25:36 profoundly articulates God's unwavering concern for justice, compassion, and the holistic well-being of His covenant people. It reveals a God who is not distant from the economic realities of His people but actively legislates to protect the vulnerable and foster a society characterized by mutual support rather than exploitation. The command to "fear thy God" elevates economic ethics to a spiritual discipline, demonstrating that how one handles finances directly reflects one's reverence for the Creator. This principle underscores the sanctity of human dignity and the communal responsibility to ensure that all members of society have the opportunity to thrive, reflecting God's own character of mercy and provision. It is a testament to God's desire for a righteous society where economic practices are an expression of love for neighbor and obedience to God.

Reflection and Application

While modern economies operate with complex financial systems where interest is a standard component of lending, the timeless principles embedded in Leviticus 25:36 remain profoundly relevant for believers today. This verse challenges us to critically examine our financial practices and attitudes, asking whether they align with God's heart for justice and compassion, particularly towards those in vulnerable situations. It calls us to prioritize the well-being of our "brother" – anyone in need, regardless of familial or national ties – over personal financial gain, especially when such gain would exploit another's distress. Our financial decisions, whether in personal lending, investments, or advocating for just economic policies, are not purely secular but are opportunities to demonstrate our "fear of God" and our love for neighbor. This means actively resisting predatory practices, seeking to alleviate poverty, and fostering economic systems that promote dignity and opportunity for all, rather than perpetuating cycles of debt and despair. It compels us to consider how our economic choices can either build up or tear down the community around us, urging us towards generosity and equity.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How do modern financial practices, particularly lending and debt, intersect with the spirit of Leviticus 25:36, and what ethical considerations does this raise for Christians?
  2. In what specific ways can I, as an individual, embody the "fear of God" in my economic decisions and interactions with others, especially the financially vulnerable?
  3. What practical steps can my community or church take to promote economic justice and compassion for the vulnerable, reflecting the principle that "thy brother may live with thee" in contemporary society?

FAQ

Does this verse mean all interest is forbidden for Christians today?

Leviticus 25:36, along with other Old Testament prohibitions against usury (e.g., Exodus 22:25), primarily addresses the charging of interest on loans to fellow Israelites who were in poverty or distress. The context is one of survival and mutual support within the covenant community, not commercial investment or productive loans. The intent was to prevent exploitation and ensure the poor were not further burdened by those who should have been their compassionate brethren. In modern economies, interest is a fundamental component of lending, reflecting inflation, risk assessment, and the time value of money, which is distinct from the ancient context of a subsistence economy. The New Testament does not explicitly forbid all interest, but it consistently upholds principles of generosity, compassion, and justice (e.g., Luke 6:34-35). Therefore, while not a blanket prohibition on all interest in all contexts, the verse's underlying principles strongly condemn predatory lending, exploitation of the vulnerable, and any financial practice that profits from another's desperation. Christians are called to ethical and compassionate financial stewardship that reflects the love of God and neighbor, ensuring their economic practices do not cause harm or injustice.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Leviticus 25:36, with its profound call for economic justice and compassion, finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. While the Old Testament law prohibited usury to preserve the physical and economic life of the Israelite "brother," Christ's ministry reveals the full scope of God's desire for human flourishing—spiritual, social, and economic. Jesus Himself perfectly embodied the "fear of God" and the love for "brother" that this verse commands, consistently prioritizing the needs of the poor, the marginalized, and the exploited (Matthew 25:31-46). He condemned the love of money and the oppression of the poor (Luke 16:13), and His parables often highlighted the importance of generous and just stewardship (e.g., the Parable of the Good Samaritan in Luke 10:25-37). Moreover, Christ is the ultimate "brother" who, though rich in divine glory, became poor for our sake, that we through His poverty might become spiritually rich (2 Corinthians 8:9). He paid the ultimate debt of sin, freeing us from spiritual destitution and enabling us to "live with" God eternally in abundant life (John 10:10). His sacrifice on the cross is the ultimate act of non-usurious giving, offering salvation freely without expecting a return that we could ever provide, embodying the very essence of God's compassionate provision for His people. Through His indwelling Spirit, believers are empowered to live out the principles of justice and generosity, reflecting His character in their economic and social interactions, ensuring that their "brother may live with thee" in both material and spiritual abundance, anticipating the full realization of God's kingdom.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 25:23–38. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentLeviticus 25:23–38
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. A law concerning the real estates of the Israelites in the land of Canaan, and the transferring of them. 1. No land should be sold for ever from the family to whose lot it fell in the division of the land. And the reason given is, The land is mine, and you are strangers and sojourners with me, Lev 25:23. (1.) God having a particular propriety in this land, he would by this restraint keep them sensible of it. The possessions of good people, who, having given up themselves to God, have therewith given up all they have to him, are in a particular manner at his disposal, and his disposal of them must be submitted to. (2.) They being strangers and sojourners with him in that land, and having his tabernacle among them, to alienate their part of that land would be in effect to cut themselves off from their fellowship and communion with God, of which that was a token and symbol, for which reason Naboth would rather incur the wrath of a king than part with the inheritance of his fathers, Kg1 21:3. 2. If a man was constrained through poverty to sell his land for the subsistence of his family, yet, if afterwards he was able, he might redeem it before the year of jubilee (Lev 25:24, Lev 25:26, Lev 25:27), and the price must be settled according to the number of years since the sale and before the jubilee. 3. If the person himself was not able to redeem it, his next kinsman might (Lev 25:25): The redeemer thereof, he that is near unto him, shall come and shall redeem, so it might be read. The kinsman is called Goel, the redeemer (Num 5:8; Rut 3:9), to whom belonged the right of redeeming the land. And this typified Christ, who assumed our nature, that he might be our kinsman, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, and, being the only kinsman we have that is able to do it, to him belonged the right of redemption. As for all our other kinsmen, their shoe must be plucked off (Rut 4:6, Rut 4:7); they cannot redeem. But Christ can and hath redeemed the inheritance which we by sin had forfeited and alienated, and made a new settlement of it upon all that by faith become allied to him. We know that this Redeemer liveth, Job 19:25. And some make this duty of the kinsman to signify the brotherly love that should be among Christians, inclining them to recover those that are fallen, and to restore them with the spirit of meekness. 4. If the land was not redeemed before the year of jubilee, then it should return of course to him that had sold or mortgaged it: In the jubilee it shall go out, Lev 25:28. This was a figure of the free grace of God towards us in Christ, by which, and not by any price or merit of our own, we are restored to the favour of God, and become entitled to paradise, from which our first parents, and we in them, were expelled for disobedience. 5. A difference was made between houses in walled cities, and lands in the country, or houses in country villages. Houses in walled cities were more the fruits of their own industry than land in the country, which was the immediate gift of God's bounty; and therefore, if a man sold a house in a city, he might redeem it any time within a year after the sale, but otherwise it was confirmed to the purchaser for ever, and should not return, no, not at the year of the jubilee, Lev 25:29, Lev 25:30. This provision was made to encourage strangers and proselytes to come and settle among them. Though they could not purchase land in Canaan to them and their heirs, yet they might purchase houses in walled cities, which would be most convenient for those who were supposed to live by trade. But country houses could be disposed of no otherwise than as lands might. 6. A clause is added in favour of the Levites, by way of exception from these rules. (1.) Dwelling houses in the cities of the Levites might be redeemed at any time, and, if not redeemed, should revert in the year of jubilee (Lev 25:32, Lev 25:33), because the Levites had no other possessions than cities and their suburbs, and God would show that the Levites were his peculiar care; and it was for the interest of the public that they should not be impoverished, or wormed out of their inheritances. (2.) The fields adjoining to their cities (Num 35:4, Num 35:5) might not be sold at any time, for they belonged, not to particular Levites, but to the city of the Levites, as a corporation, who could not alienate without a wrong to their tribe; therefore, if any of those fields were sold, the bargain was void, Lev 25:34. Even the Egyptians took care to preserve the land of the priests, Gen 47:22. And there is no less reason for the taking of the maintenance of the gospel ministry under the special protection of Christian governments.

II.A law for the relief of the poor, and the tender usage of poor debtors, and these are of more general and perpetual obligation than the former.

1.The poor must be relieved, Lev 25:35. Here is,

(1.)Our brother's poverty and distress supposed: If thy brother be waxen poor; not only thy brother by nation as a Jew, but thy brother by nature as a man, for it follows, though he be a stranger or a sojourner. All men are to be looked upon and treated as brethren, for we have all one Father, Mal 2:10. Though he is poor, yet still he is thy brother, and is to be loved and owned as a brother. Poverty does not destroy the relation. Though a son of Abraham, yet he may wax poor and fall into decay. Note, Poverty and decay are great grievances, and very common: The poor you have always with you.

(2.)Our duty enjoined: Thou shalt relieve him. By sympathy, pitying the poor; by service, doing for them; and by supply, giving to them according to their necessity and thy ability.

2.Poor debtors must not be oppressed: If thy brother be waxen poor, and have occasion to borrow money of thee for the necessary support of his family, take thou no usury of him, either for money or victuals, Lev 25:36, Lev 25:37. And thus far this law binds still, but could never be thought binding where money is borrowed for purchase of lands, trade, or other improvements; for there it is reasonable that the lender share with the borrower in the profit. The law here is plainly intended for the relief of the poor, to whom it is sometimes as great a charity to lend freely as to give. Observe the arguments here used against extortion. (1.) God patronizes the poor: "Fear thy God, who will reckon with thee for all injuries done to the poor: thou fearest not them, but fear him." (2.) Relieve the poor, that they may live with thee, and some way or other they may be serviceable to thee. The rich can as ill spare the hands of the poor as the poor can the purses of the rich. (3.) The same argument is used to enforce this precept that prefaces all the ten commandments: I am the Lord your God which brought you out of Egypt, Lev 25:38. Note, It becomes those that have received mercy to show mercy. If God has been gracious to us, we ought not to be rigorous with our brethren.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 25:36 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8