Naar de inhoud

Leviticus 25:25

“Redemption of Land and Property”· Leviticus 25:23–34Read in context
King James Version
If thy brother be waxen poor, and hath sold away some of his possession, and if any of his kin come to redeem it, then shall he redeem that which his brother sold.
KJV (with Strong's)
If thy brother H251 be waxen poor H4134, and hath sold H4376 away some of his possession H272, and if any of his kin H7138 come H935 to redeem H1350 it, then shall he redeem H1350 that which his brother H251 sold H4465.
Complete Jewish Bible
That is, if one of you becomes poor and sells some of his property, his next-of-kin can come and buy back what his relative sold.
Berean Standard Bible
If your brother becomes impoverished and sells some of his property, his nearest of kin may come and redeem what his brother has sold.
American Standard Version
If thy brother be waxed poor, and sell some of his possession, then shall his kinsman that is next unto him come, and shall redeem that which his brother hath sold.
World English Bible Messianic
“‘If your brother becomes poor, and sells some of his possessions, then his kinsman who is next to him shall come, and redeem that which his brother has sold.
Geneva Bible (1599)
If thy brother be impouerished, and sell his possession, then his redeemer shall come, euen his neere kinsman, and bye out that which his brother solde.
Young's Literal Translation
`When thy brother becometh poor, and hath sold his possession, then hath his redeemer who is near unto him come, and he hath redeemed the sold thing of his brother;
Nederlands · STVE
Wanneer uw broeder zal verarmd zijn, en iets van zijn bezitting verkocht zal hebben, zo zal zijn losser, die hem nabestaande is, komen, en zal het verkochte zijns broeders lossen.
Translation
In the KJVVerse 3,495 of 31,102 · 11.2%

Study this verse

Summary

Leviticus 25:25 introduces a pivotal aspect of Israelite land law, establishing the right and obligation of a kinsman to redeem ancestral property that has been sold due to economic hardship. This statute, deeply embedded within the broader framework of the Sabbatical and Jubilee laws, underscores God's providential care for the vulnerable, the sanctity of family inheritance, and the ultimate divine ownership of the land, thereby ensuring that temporary financial distress would not result in permanent dispossession from one's tribal allocation.

Context

Literary Context

Leviticus 25 forms a crucial segment of the Mosaic Law, specifically detailing the economic and social regulations governing Israel's life in the promised land. Following the comprehensive laws concerning the Sabbatical Year, where the land was to rest every seventh year (Leviticus 25:1-7), and preceding the even more encompassing Year of Jubilee, which mandated the return of all land to its original families every fifty years (Leviticus 25:8-55), verse 25 addresses a specific, immediate scenario of land alienation due to poverty. It is part of a series of provisions designed to prevent the permanent loss of family inheritance, ensuring that the land, ultimately belonging to God, would revert to its original tribal owners at the Jubilee. This verse introduces the concept of redemption (Hebrew: ga'al) as a vital mechanism to restore what was lost, setting the stage for subsequent laws regarding the redemption of houses, persons, and even the land itself in the lead-up to the Jubilee.

Historical & Cultural Context

In ancient Israel, land was not merely an economic asset but a sacred trust, a divine inheritance granted by God to each family at the time of the conquest (Numbers 26:53). This system was designed to foster social stability, prevent the rise of a permanent landless class, and consistently affirm God's sovereign ownership over the entire land (Leviticus 25:23). However, despite these safeguards, poverty could still compel a family to sell their land. Leviticus 25:25 provides a critical social safety net: the institution of the "kinsman-redeemer" or go'el. This close relative had the inherent right and moral obligation to buy back the sold property, ensuring that the family's patrimony remained intact. This practice served as a vital reflection of God's compassion for the poor and His design for a just and equitable society, standing in stark contrast to surrounding ancient Near Eastern cultures where land could be permanently alienated, leading to perpetual social stratification.

Key Themes

This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes within Leviticus and the Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Ownership, particularly over the land, which is declared to belong to God (Leviticus 25:23). This foundational truth underpins all land laws, ensuring that human transactions are never absolute. Closely related is the theme of Social Justice and Compassion for the Poor, as the law provides a mechanism to prevent permanent economic disenfranchisement and uphold the dignity of the impoverished. The concept of Redemption (Hebrew: ga'al) is central, highlighting God's character as one who restores and reclaims, and setting a precedent for human responsibility in this regard. Finally, the verse reinforces the importance of Family and Inheritance, emphasizing the preservation of tribal and familial allotments as a cornerstone of Israelite identity and stability, a principle seen throughout the allocation of land in Joshua 13-21 and the protection of family lines.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Brother ʼâch' H251

This primitive word (H251) refers to a brother in the widest sense, encompassing literal kinship and metaphorical affinity. In this context, it emphasizes the communal bond and shared identity within the Israelite covenant community. The law applies to a fellow Israelite, highlighting the familial responsibility to care for one another, especially in times of hardship.

Possession ʼăchuzzâh' H272

Derived from a root meaning "to seize," this feminine passive participle (H272) denotes something seized, specifically a possession, most often referring to land. It signifies the ancestral land allotment given by God to each family, which was intended to be a permanent inheritance. The sale of this "possession" was a grave matter, indicating severe poverty and triggering the kinsman-redeemer's right.

Redeem gâʼal' H1350

This primitive root (H1350) is central to the verse and chapter, meaning "to buy back," "to reclaim," or "to act as a kinsman-redeemer." According to Oriental law of kinship, the go'el (the one who redeems) was the next of kin obligated to buy back a relative's property, marry his widow, or avenge his death. It signifies restoration and liberation through the payment of a price, carrying profound theological implications for God's redemptive work.

Verse Breakdown

"If thy brother be waxen poor"

This opening clause establishes the specific condition that necessitates the application of this law. It acknowledges the reality of economic hardship within the Israelite community, even under divine law, where a fellow Israelite ("thy brother") could fall into poverty. This phrase underscores the vulnerability of individuals and sets the stage for the communal response.

"and hath sold away [some] of his possession"

This describes the direct consequence of the aforementioned poverty: the forced alienation of ancestral land. The phrase "some of his possession" indicates that the sale might not encompass the entire inheritance but even a portion was significant enough to trigger the redemptive mechanism. This "sale" was not a permanent transfer of ownership but more akin to a long-term lease until the Year of Jubilee, or until redeemed earlier.

"and if any of his kin come to redeem it"

This introduces the crucial figure of the go'el, the "kinsman-redeemer," a close relative who possessed both the right and the responsibility to intervene. The phrase "come to redeem it" implies an active, voluntary, and compassionate initiative on the part of the kinsman, stepping forward to restore the family's patrimony.

"then shall he redeem that which his brother sold"

This concluding clause states the legal obligation and the desired outcome. Once the qualified kinsman steps forward, he shall execute the redemption. This act ensures the property's return to the original family line, upholding the principle of divine land ownership and the preservation of tribal inheritance, even in the face of individual hardship, demonstrating the law's protective and restorative intent.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 25:25 employs several literary devices that enhance its clarity and underscore its purpose within the Mosaic Law. The most prominent device is Legal Language, characterized by the use of conditional clauses ("If... then...") that precisely define specific circumstances and their prescribed legal responses. This precise, prescriptive phrasing is typical of covenantal law, establishing clear and unambiguous guidelines for societal conduct. There is also a significant element of Repetition of the concept of "redeem" (from the Hebrew root ga'al), which serves to emphasize the central theme of restoration and the vital role of the kinsman-redeemer in maintaining the integrity of family inheritance. Furthermore, the verse functions as a Case Law, presenting a particular, common scenario (poverty leading to land sale) to illustrate a broader principle of justice and compassion within the Covenantal Framework of Israel's relationship with God. The land itself carries profound Symbolism, representing God's faithfulness, Israel's divine inheritance, and the security of their identity as a people rooted in the promises of God.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Leviticus 25:25 profoundly illustrates God's compassionate design for His people, emphasizing that economic systems should serve human dignity and preserve familial inheritance rather than perpetuate cycles of poverty. It reveals a theology of divine ownership, where the land is ultimately God's, and humans are merely stewards, preventing permanent alienation and fostering a deep sense of communal responsibility. The concept of "redemption" (Hebrew: ga'al) is theologically rich, prefiguring God's broader redemptive plan for humanity, where a Kinsman intervenes to restore what was lost due to human failing. This law highlights God's unwavering concern for social justice, ensuring that the most vulnerable among His people had a pathway to recovery and dignity, reflecting His character as a just and merciful God who actively cares for the poor and dispossessed.

Reflection and Application

Leviticus 25:25, though rooted in the specific land laws of ancient Israel, offers timeless principles for personal and communal living that resonate deeply with Christian ethics. It challenges us to consider our posture towards those experiencing economic or social hardship, reminding us that true compassion extends beyond mere pity to active, sacrificial intervention. The concept of the kinsman-redeemer compels us to recognize our interconnectedness within the human family, and especially within the family of faith, and to embrace our responsibility to uplift and restore those who have fallen on hard times. This verse calls us to cultivate a worldview where material possessions are held lightly, understanding that ultimate ownership belongs to God, and our role is one of faithful stewardship. It encourages us to build communities that prioritize mutual support, justice, and the restoration of dignity, rather than allowing economic systems to create permanent disenfranchisement or perpetuate cycles of poverty.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the principle of "redemption" in this verse inform our understanding of Christian charity and social justice today?
  2. In what specific ways can we, as individuals or as a faith community, act as "kinsman-redeemers" for those who have lost their "possession" (whether material, relational, or spiritual) due to hardship or injustice?
  3. How does the ultimate divine ownership of land and resources, as implied here, shape our perspective on wealth accumulation, inheritance, and environmental stewardship in the modern world?

FAQ

What is the significance of the "kinsman-redeemer" (go'el) in Israelite society?

The go'el was a male relative, typically the nearest of kin, who had specific rights and responsibilities within Israelite law, acting as a protector and restorer of the family's well-being. These responsibilities included avenging bloodshed (Numbers 35:19), marrying a childless widow to raise an heir (as exemplified in the Book of Ruth, though not explicitly called go'el in that specific context, it shares the spirit of family preservation), and, as seen in Leviticus 25:25, redeeming family land or family members sold into servitude due to poverty. The go'el embodied the strong communal and familial bonds that were central to Israelite identity and God's covenantal design, ensuring the continuity of family lines and their allotted inheritance.

Does this law about land redemption apply to Christians today?

While the specific land laws of ancient Israel, including the detailed provisions for land redemption and the Jubilee, are part of the Old Covenant and do not apply literally to Christians today as a legal code, the underlying theological and ethical principles remain profoundly relevant. Christians are called to embody the spirit of compassion, justice, and care for the poor that these laws exemplify. The emphasis on preventing permanent poverty, ensuring human dignity, and fostering communal responsibility continues to inform Christian ethics regarding wealth, social welfare, and economic justice. Furthermore, the concept of "redemption" in this verse serves as a powerful type and shadow of the ultimate spiritual redemption offered through Jesus Christ, which is the New Testament fulfillment of this Old Testament principle.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Leviticus 25:25, with its emphasis on the kinsman-redeemer, serves as a profound Old Testament foreshadowing of Jesus Christ. Just as the go'el stepped in to buy back lost land and restore a family's inheritance, so Jesus, our ultimate Kinsman-Redeemer, entered human history by taking on flesh (John 1:14), becoming fully human and therefore our "brother" (Hebrews 2:11). Humanity, through sin, had "sold away" its spiritual inheritance, falling into profound spiritual poverty and bondage to sin and death (Romans 6:23). Jesus, through His perfect life, atoning death on the cross, and glorious resurrection, paid the ultimate, immeasurable price to "redeem" us (Ephesians 1:7). He bought us back not with silver or gold, but with His own precious blood (1 Peter 1:18-19), thereby restoring our broken relationship with God and securing for us an eternal, imperishable inheritance (1 Peter 1:4). He is the one who fully restores what was lost, bringing us back into the family of God and granting us access to the true spiritual "possession" of eternal life and intimate fellowship with the Father.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 25:23–38. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentLeviticus 25:23–38
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. A law concerning the real estates of the Israelites in the land of Canaan, and the transferring of them. 1. No land should be sold for ever from the family to whose lot it fell in the division of the land. And the reason given is, The land is mine, and you are strangers and sojourners with me, Lev 25:23. (1.) God having a particular propriety in this land, he would by this restraint keep them sensible of it. The possessions of good people, who, having given up themselves to God, have therewith given up all they have to him, are in a particular manner at his disposal, and his disposal of them must be submitted to. (2.) They being strangers and sojourners with him in that land, and having his tabernacle among them, to alienate their part of that land would be in effect to cut themselves off from their fellowship and communion with God, of which that was a token and symbol, for which reason Naboth would rather incur the wrath of a king than part with the inheritance of his fathers, Kg1 21:3. 2. If a man was constrained through poverty to sell his land for the subsistence of his family, yet, if afterwards he was able, he might redeem it before the year of jubilee (Lev 25:24, Lev 25:26, Lev 25:27), and the price must be settled according to the number of years since the sale and before the jubilee. 3. If the person himself was not able to redeem it, his next kinsman might (Lev 25:25): The redeemer thereof, he that is near unto him, shall come and shall redeem, so it might be read. The kinsman is called Goel, the redeemer (Num 5:8; Rut 3:9), to whom belonged the right of redeeming the land. And this typified Christ, who assumed our nature, that he might be our kinsman, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, and, being the only kinsman we have that is able to do it, to him belonged the right of redemption. As for all our other kinsmen, their shoe must be plucked off (Rut 4:6, Rut 4:7); they cannot redeem. But Christ can and hath redeemed the inheritance which we by sin had forfeited and alienated, and made a new settlement of it upon all that by faith become allied to him. We know that this Redeemer liveth, Job 19:25. And some make this duty of the kinsman to signify the brotherly love that should be among Christians, inclining them to recover those that are fallen, and to restore them with the spirit of meekness. 4. If the land was not redeemed before the year of jubilee, then it should return of course to him that had sold or mortgaged it: In the jubilee it shall go out, Lev 25:28. This was a figure of the free grace of God towards us in Christ, by which, and not by any price or merit of our own, we are restored to the favour of God, and become entitled to paradise, from which our first parents, and we in them, were expelled for disobedience. 5. A difference was made between houses in walled cities, and lands in the country, or houses in country villages. Houses in walled cities were more the fruits of their own industry than land in the country, which was the immediate gift of God's bounty; and therefore, if a man sold a house in a city, he might redeem it any time within a year after the sale, but otherwise it was confirmed to the purchaser for ever, and should not return, no, not at the year of the jubilee, Lev 25:29, Lev 25:30. This provision was made to encourage strangers and proselytes to come and settle among them. Though they could not purchase land in Canaan to them and their heirs, yet they might purchase houses in walled cities, which would be most convenient for those who were supposed to live by trade. But country houses could be disposed of no otherwise than as lands might. 6. A clause is added in favour of the Levites, by way of exception from these rules. (1.) Dwelling houses in the cities of the Levites might be redeemed at any time, and, if not redeemed, should revert in the year of jubilee (Lev 25:32, Lev 25:33), because the Levites had no other possessions than cities and their suburbs, and God would show that the Levites were his peculiar care; and it was for the interest of the public that they should not be impoverished, or wormed out of their inheritances. (2.) The fields adjoining to their cities (Num 35:4, Num 35:5) might not be sold at any time, for they belonged, not to particular Levites, but to the city of the Levites, as a corporation, who could not alienate without a wrong to their tribe; therefore, if any of those fields were sold, the bargain was void, Lev 25:34. Even the Egyptians took care to preserve the land of the priests, Gen 47:22. And there is no less reason for the taking of the maintenance of the gospel ministry under the special protection of Christian governments.

II.A law for the relief of the poor, and the tender usage of poor debtors, and these are of more general and perpetual obligation than the former.

1.The poor must be relieved, Lev 25:35. Here is,

(1.)Our brother's poverty and distress supposed: If thy brother be waxen poor; not only thy brother by nation as a Jew, but thy brother by nature as a man, for it follows, though he be a stranger or a sojourner. All men are to be looked upon and treated as brethren, for we have all one Father, Mal 2:10. Though he is poor, yet still he is thy brother, and is to be loved and owned as a brother. Poverty does not destroy the relation. Though a son of Abraham, yet he may wax poor and fall into decay. Note, Poverty and decay are great grievances, and very common: The poor you have always with you.

(2.)Our duty enjoined: Thou shalt relieve him. By sympathy, pitying the poor; by service, doing for them; and by supply, giving to them according to their necessity and thy ability.

2.Poor debtors must not be oppressed: If thy brother be waxen poor, and have occasion to borrow money of thee for the necessary support of his family, take thou no usury of him, either for money or victuals, Lev 25:36, Lev 25:37. And thus far this law binds still, but could never be thought binding where money is borrowed for purchase of lands, trade, or other improvements; for there it is reasonable that the lender share with the borrower in the profit. The law here is plainly intended for the relief of the poor, to whom it is sometimes as great a charity to lend freely as to give. Observe the arguments here used against extortion. (1.) God patronizes the poor: "Fear thy God, who will reckon with thee for all injuries done to the poor: thou fearest not them, but fear him." (2.) Relieve the poor, that they may live with thee, and some way or other they may be serviceable to thee. The rich can as ill spare the hands of the poor as the poor can the purses of the rich. (3.) The same argument is used to enforce this precept that prefaces all the ten commandments: I am the Lord your God which brought you out of Egypt, Lev 25:38. Note, It becomes those that have received mercy to show mercy. If God has been gracious to us, we ought not to be rigorous with our brethren.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 25:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8