Zum Inhalt springen

Ruth 3:12

“Boaz Promises to Act as Kinsman Redeemer”· Ruth 3:10–13Read in context
King James Version
And now it is true that I am thy near kinsman: howbeit there is a kinsman nearer than I.
KJV (with Strong's)
And now it is true H551 that I am thy near kinsman H1350: howbeit there is H3426 a kinsman H1350 nearer H7138 than I.
Complete Jewish Bible
Now, it is true that I am a redeeming kinsman; but there is a redeemer who is a closer relative than I am.
Berean Standard Bible
Yes, it is true that I am a kinsman-redeemer, but there is a redeemer nearer than I.
American Standard Version
And now it is true that I am a near kinsman; howbeit there is a kinsman nearer than I.
World English Bible Messianic
Now it is true that I am a near kinsman; however there is a kinsman nearer than I.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And now, it is true that I am thy kinsman, howbeit there is a kinsman neerer then I.
Young's Literal Translation
And now, surely, true, that I am a redeemer, but also there is a redeemer nearer than I.
Deutsch · Schlachter
Und nun, es ist wahr, daß ich ein Löser bin; aber es ist noch ein anderer Löser vorhanden, der näher verwandt ist als ich.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 7,185 of 31,102 · 23.1%

Study this verse

Summary

Ruth 3:12 marks a pivotal moment in the unfolding narrative of redemption, as Boaz, having been propositioned by Ruth at the threshing floor, affirms his willingness to act as her kinsman-redeemer (goel) but reveals a crucial legal impediment: there is another relative who holds a prior claim to this sacred responsibility. This declaration underscores Boaz's unwavering integrity, his deep respect for Israelite law, and his commitment to proper legal protocol, setting the stage for the dramatic resolution of the redemption process and highlighting the intricate workings of divine providence in the lives of Ruth and Naomi.

Context

Literary Context

This verse immediately follows Ruth's bold and vulnerable act of lying at Boaz's feet at the threshing floor, a symbolic gesture of requesting him to fulfill the role of a kinsman-redeemer. Boaz, awakened by Ruth, responds with praise for her virtuous character and loyalty to Naomi, acknowledging her request for him to "spread your cloak over your servant, for you are a kinsman-redeemer" (as seen in Ruth 3:9-11). His statement in Ruth 3:12 serves as a direct answer to her plea, affirming his eligibility and desire to redeem her, yet introducing a legal complication that must be resolved before their union can proceed. This sets up the dramatic legal proceedings at the city gate in Ruth 4, where Boaz publicly addresses the issue of the nearer kinsman, demonstrating his commitment to righteousness and proper order.

Historical & Cultural Context

The concept of the "kinsman-redeemer" (goel) was a vital institution in ancient Israelite society, deeply rooted in the Mosaic Law. The goel had specific responsibilities, including redeeming family land that had been sold due to poverty (as outlined in Leviticus 25:25), redeeming a relative from slavery (see Leviticus 25:47-49), avenging the blood of a slain relative (Numbers 35:19), and, most relevant here, ensuring the perpetuation of the family name and inheritance, particularly for a widow without an heir. While not a strict levirate marriage (which applied to a brother-in-law), Boaz's situation is a broader application of the goel role, encompassing the responsibility to raise up a name for the deceased. The social structure demanded strict adherence to these legal obligations, with priority given to the closest male relative. Boaz's acknowledgment of a nearer kinsman demonstrates his deep respect for these legal and familial traditions, prioritizing the law over immediate personal desire.

Key Themes

Ruth 3:12 is central to several key themes in the Book of Ruth. Integrity and Righteousness are powerfully displayed through Boaz's commitment to legal protocol, even when it presents a personal inconvenience or delay. His actions exemplify a righteous character that honors God's law and community standards, setting him apart as a man of true virtue, as Ruth herself declares in Ruth 3:11. The theme of Divine Providence is also profoundly evident; while a legal obstacle arises, it is clear that God is working through these human laws and choices, including the specific order of the goel and Boaz's ethical conduct, to bring about His intended outcome for Ruth and Naomi, ultimately leading to the lineage of David and Christ. Finally, the verse profoundly develops the theme of the Kinsman-Redeemer (goel), illustrating the precise legal order and the profound implications of this role for property, family lineage, and, ultimately, the redemption of individuals. This earthly type foreshadows the ultimate spiritual redemption found in Christ, our divine goel.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

true ʼomnâm' H551

This adverb signifies "verily," "indeed," "no doubt," or "surely." Boaz uses this word to unequivocally affirm the validity of Ruth's assertion and his own status as a kinsman-redeemer. It underscores the certainty and honesty of his declaration, leaving no room for doubt about his intentions or his legal standing.

kinsman gâʼal' H1350

This primitive root means "to redeem according to the Oriental law of kinship," signifying the role of the next of kin. The goel was responsible for buying back a relative's property, marrying his widow to perpetuate the family name, or avenging a wrong. Boaz acknowledges that he indeed possesses this right and responsibility, but the term also highlights the specific legal and familial obligations he is bound by, including the priority of other relatives.

nearer qârôwb' H7138

This adjective, derived from a root meaning "to draw near," indicates proximity in place, kindred, or time. In this context, it specifically refers to a relative who is "closer" in the line of kinship, holding a prior legal claim to the duties of the goel. Boaz's use of this word emphasizes the strict hierarchical order of redemption rights within Israelite law, which he, as a man of integrity, must respect.

Verse Breakdown

"And now it is true that I [am thy] near kinsman"

Boaz directly affirms Ruth's understanding and request, validating her bold action at the threshing floor. He confirms his eligibility and willingness to fulfill the role of goel—the kinsman-redeemer. This statement is an honest and immediate acknowledgment of his status and his positive disposition towards her, signaling that her hope for redemption is indeed well-placed in him. It sets the foundation for the subsequent legal discussion by establishing his legitimate claim to the role.

"howbeit there is a kinsman nearer than I"

This clause introduces the central conflict and legal hurdle that must be overcome. Despite his desire and eligibility, Boaz reveals that another male relative holds a prior claim to the responsibility of redemption according to Israelite law. This declaration demonstrates Boaz's unwavering integrity and adherence to the law, even when it delays his personal desires or the immediate resolution of Ruth's situation. It sets the stage for the public legal resolution required to properly execute the redemption according to Israelite custom, moving the narrative from a private encounter to a public transaction.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several literary devices that enhance its narrative impact and theological depth. Foreshadowing is prominent, as Boaz's revelation of a nearer kinsman directly sets up the dramatic legal confrontation at the city gate in Ruth 4. This creates suspense and anticipation for how this obstacle will be overcome, drawing the reader deeper into the unfolding divine plan. There is also an element of Dramatic Irony, as the reader, aware of God's overarching plan for Ruth and Naomi, knows that this "obstacle" will ultimately serve to highlight Boaz's righteousness and ensure the proper, God-ordained outcome, rather than thwarting it. The precise, almost legalistic language Boaz uses ("it is true," "nearer kinsman") also emphasizes the Verisimilitude of the narrative, grounding the romantic and providential elements in the practical realities of Israelite law and custom, making the story feel authentic and historically plausible.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Ruth 3:12 is a powerful testament to the themes of divine sovereignty and human responsibility. Boaz's integrity in upholding the law, even when it presents an inconvenience to his personal desires, demonstrates a deep commitment to righteousness that aligns with God's character. His actions show that God works not only through miraculous interventions but also through the diligent and ethical adherence to established laws and customs. This verse highlights how God orchestrates events, using human choices and societal structures, to bring about His perfect will, ensuring that the lineage through which the Messiah would come is preserved and honored. The concept of the goel here is a profound theological type, pointing beyond itself to the ultimate Redeemer, Jesus Christ, who perfectly fulfills the role of the Kinsman-Redeemer.

Reflection and Application

The unexpected revelation of a nearer kinsman in Ruth 3:12 offers a profound lesson in patience, integrity, and trust in divine timing. Just as Ruth and Boaz faced a legal hurdle that delayed their union and the fulfillment of their hopes, we often encounter unforeseen obstacles in our own lives, even when we believe we are following God's leading. Boaz's unwavering commitment to doing things "the right way," according to the established law and ethical principles, serves as a powerful model for us. It challenges us to prioritize integrity and ethical conduct, even when immediate gratification or personal desire might tempt us to cut corners or bypass due process. This verse encourages us to trust that God's plan unfolds perfectly, sometimes through detours or delays that ultimately serve a greater, often unseen, purpose. Our reliance on God's sovereignty, coupled with our diligent obedience to His principles, is key to navigating life's complexities and witnessing His redemptive work in our lives.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does Boaz's commitment to legal integrity, despite his personal desire, challenge my own approach to ethical dilemmas and personal aspirations?
  2. In what areas of my life am I tempted to bypass established principles or God's timing for quicker or easier outcomes?
  3. How can I cultivate greater patience and trust in God's timing when faced with unexpected obstacles or delays in my journey?
  4. What does the concept of a "nearer kinsman" teach me about the importance of proper order, due process, and respecting established authority in God's economy?

FAQ

Why was there a nearer kinsman, and why didn't Boaz just marry Ruth immediately?

Boaz could not simply marry Ruth immediately because Israelite law regarding the kinsman-redeemer (goel) stipulated a specific order of priority based on the closeness of kinship. While Boaz was a qualified kinsman, there was another relative who was even closer to Naomi's deceased husband, Elimelech, and therefore had the first right and responsibility to redeem the family's land and, implicitly, marry Ruth to perpetuate the family line. Boaz's integrity and deep respect for the law meant he had to follow the proper legal procedure, even though it introduced a temporary delay. This adherence to legal protocol is a testament to his character and the importance of upholding the law within Israelite society, as detailed in the public proceedings at the city gate in Ruth 4:1-6.

What was the significance of the "kinsman-redeemer" (goel) in ancient Israel?

The goel was a vital figure in ancient Israelite society, serving as a family protector and restorer. This role encompassed several responsibilities, including buying back family land that had been sold due to poverty (as outlined in Leviticus 25:25), redeeming a relative from slavery (see Leviticus 25:47-49), and avenging the blood of a slain relative. In the context of Ruth, the goel's role extended to preserving the family line and inheritance, particularly for a widow like Ruth who had no children to carry on her deceased husband's name. The goel acted as a champion for the vulnerable and a preserver of family integrity and legacy, making Boaz's role as Ruth's goel profoundly significant for her future and the lineage of David.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The narrative of Boaz as the kinsman-redeemer in Ruth 3:12 serves as a profound Old Testament type pointing to the ultimate Kinsman-Redeemer, Jesus Christ. Just as Boaz, though a qualified goel, faced a legal impediment that required a public, lawful resolution, so too did Christ, our divine goel, have to fulfill all righteousness and satisfy the demands of God's holy law to redeem humanity. Boaz had to "pay a price" by acquiring the land and the right to Ruth, while Christ paid the ultimate price, not with silver or gold, but with His precious blood (as affirmed in 1 Peter 1:18-19), to redeem us from the slavery of sin and death (a truth powerfully declared in Galatians 3:13). He, being fully God and fully man, became our "near kinsman" by taking on human flesh (as explained in Hebrews 2:14-17), thereby qualifying to redeem us from a debt we could never pay. Through His perfect sacrifice and glorious resurrection, Christ has secured for us an eternal inheritance and a place in God's family, fulfilling the deepest spiritual longings foreshadowed in the beautiful story of Ruth and Boaz (a reality celebrated in Ephesians 1:7).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ruth 3:6–13. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 8 verses
Passage under commentRuth 3:6–13
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here is, I. Boaz's good management of his common affairs. It is probable, according to the common usage, 1. When his servants winnowed, he was with them, and had his eye upon them, to prevent, not their stealing any of his corn (he had no reason to fear that), but their waste of it through carelessness in the winnowing of it. Masters may sustain great losses by servants that are heedless, though they be honest, which is a reason why men should be diligent to know the state of their own flocks, and look well to them. 2. When he had more than ordinary work to be done, he treated his servants with extraordinary entertainments, and, for their encouragement, did eat and drink with them. It well becomes those that are rich and great to be generous to, and also to be familiar with, those that are under them, and employed for them. 3. When Boaz had supped with his workmen, and been awhile pleasant with them, he went to bed in due time, so early that by midnight he had his first sleep (Rut 3:8), and thus he would be fit for his business betimes next morning. All that are good husbands will keep good hours, and not indulge themselves nor their families in unseasonable mirth. The Chaldee paraphrase tell us (Rut 3:7) that Boaz ate and drank and his heart was good (and so the Hebrew word is), and he blessed the name of the Lord, who had heard his prayers, and taken away the famine from the land of Israel. So that he went sober to bed, his heart was in a good frame, and not overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness. And he did not go to bed without prayer. Now that he had eaten and was full he blessed the Lord, and now that he was going to rest he committed himself to the divine protection; it was well he did, for he had an unusual temptation before him, though he knew not of it. 4. He had his bed or couch laid at the end of the heap of corn; not because he had set his heart upon it, nor only that he might watch and keep it safe from thieves, but it was too late to go home to the city, and here he would be near his work, and ready for it next morning, and he would show that he was not nice or curious in his lodging, neither took state nor consulted his ease, but was, like his father Jacob, a plain man, that, when there was occasion, could make his bed in a barn, and, if need were, sleep contentedly in the straw.

II.Ruth's good assurance in the management of her affair.

She observed her mother's orders, went and laid herself down, not by his side, but overcross his bed's feet, in her clothes, and kept awake, waiting for an opportunity to tell her errand. When he awaked in the night, and perceived there was somebody at his feet, and enquired who it was, she told him her name and then her errand (Rut 3:9), that she came to put herself under his protection, as the person appointed by the divine law to be her protector: "Thou art he that has a right to redeem a family and an estate from perishing, and therefore let this ruin be under thy hand: and spread thy skirt over me - be pleased to espouse me and my cause." Thus must we by faith apply ourselves to Jesus Christ as our next kinsman, that is able to redeem us, come under his wings, as we are invited (Mat 23:37), and beg of him to spread his skirt over us. "Lord Jesus, take me into thy covenant and under thy care. I am oppressed, undertake for me."

III.The good acceptance Ruth gained with Boaz.

What she did had no ill-effect, either one way or other, so that Naomi was not mistaken in her good opinion of her kinsman. He knew her demand was just and honourable, and treated her accordingly, and did not deal with his sister as with a harlot, Gen 34:31. For,

1.He did not offer to violate her chastity, though he had all the opportunity that could be. The Chaldee paraphrase thus descants upon it: - He subdued his concupiscence, and did not approach to her, but did as Joseph the Just, who would not come near to his Egyptian mistress, and as Phaltiel the Pious, who, when Saul had given him Michal, David's wife (Sa1 25:44), put a sword between himself and her, that he might not touch her. Boaz knew it was not any sinful lust that brought her thither, and therefore bravely maintained both his own honour and hers.

2.He did not put any ill construction upon what she did, did not reproach her as an impudent woman and unfit to make an honest man a wife. She having approved herself well in the fields, and all her conduct having been modest and decent, he would not, from this instance, entertain the least suspicion of her character nor seem to do so, perhaps blaming himself that he had not offered the service of a kinsman to these distressed widows, and saved her this trouble, and ready to say as Judah concerning his daughter-in-law, She is more righteous than I. But on the contrary,

(1.)He commended her, spoke kindly to her, called her his daughter, and spoke honourably of her, as a woman of eminent virtue. She had shown in this instance more kindness to her mother-in-law, and to the family into which she had matched, than in any instance yet. It was very kind to leave her own country and come along with her mother to the land of Israel, to dwell with her, and help to maintain her. For this he had blessed her (Rut 2:12); but now he says, Thou hast shown more kindness in the latter end than at the beginning (Rut 3:10), in that she consulted not her own fancy, but her husband's family, in marrying again. She received not the addresses of young men (much less did she seek them) whether poor or rich, but was willing to marry as the divine law directed, though it was to an old man, because it was for the honour and interest of the family into which she had matched, and for which she had an entire kindness. Young people must aim, in disposing of themselves, not so much to please their own eye as to please God and their parents.

(2.)He promised her marriage (Rut 3:11): "Fear not that I will slight thee, or expose thee; no, I will do all that thou requirest, for it is the same that the law requires, from the next of kin, and I have no reason to decline it, for all the city of my people doth know that thou art a virtuous woman," Rut 3:11. Note,

[1.]Exemplary virtue ought to have its due praise (Phi 4:8), and it will recommend both men and women to the esteem of the wisest and best. Ruth was a poor woman, and poverty often obscures the lustre of virtue; yet Ruth's virtues, even in a mean condition, were generally taken notice of and could not be hid; nay, her virtues took away the reproach of her poverty. If poor people be but good people, they shall have honour from God and man. Ruth had been remarkable for her humility, which paved the way to this honour. The less she proclaimed her own goodness the more did her neighbours take notice of it.

[2.]In the choice of yoke-fellows, virtue should especially be regarded, known approved virtue. Let religion determine the choice, and it will certainly crown the choice and make it comfortable. Wisdom is better than gold, and, when it is said to be good with an inheritance, the meaning is that an inheritance is worth little without it.

(3.)He made his promise conditional, and could not do otherwise, for it seems there was a kinsman that was nearer than he, to whom the right of redemption did belong, v. 12. This he knew, but we may reasonably suppose Naomi (who had been long abroad, and could not be exact in the pedigree of her husband's family) was ignorant of it, otherwise she would never have sent her daughter to make her claim of Boaz. Yet he does not bid her go herself to this other kinsman; this would have been to put too great a hardship upon her: but he promises,

[1.]That he would himself propose it to the other kinsman, and know his mind. The Hebrew word for a widow signifies one that is dumb. Boaz will therefore open his mouth for the dumb (Pro 31:8), and will say that for this widow which she knew not how to say for herself.

[2.]That, if the other kinsman refused to do the kinsman's part, he would do it, would marry the widow, redeem the land, and so repair the family. This promise he backs with a solemn oath, for it was a conditional contract of marriage (Rut 3:13): As the Lord liveth. Thus keeping the matter in suspense, he bade her wait till morning. Bishop Hall thus sums up this matter in his contemplations: - "Boaz, instead of touching her as a wanton, blesseth her as a father, encourageth her as a friend, promiseth her as a kinsman, rewards her as a patron, and sends her away laden with hopes and gifts, no less chaste, more happy, than she came. O admirable temperance, worthy the progenitor of him in whose lips and heart there was no guile!"

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ruth 3:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8