- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 25:23–38. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. A law concerning the real estates of the Israelites in the land of Canaan, and the transferring of them. 1. No land should be sold for ever from the family to whose lot it fell in the division of the land. And the reason given is, The land is mine, and you are strangers and sojourners with me, Lev 25:23. (1.) God having a particular propriety in this land, he would by this restraint keep them sensible of it. The possessions of good people, who, having given up themselves to God, have therewith given up all they have to him, are in a particular manner at his disposal, and his disposal of them must be submitted to. (2.) They being strangers and sojourners with him in that land, and having his tabernacle among them, to alienate their part of that land would be in effect to cut themselves off from their fellowship and communion with God, of which that was a token and symbol, for which reason Naboth would rather incur the wrath of a king than part with the inheritance of his fathers, Kg1 21:3. 2. If a man was constrained through poverty to sell his land for the subsistence of his family, yet, if afterwards he was able, he might redeem it before the year of jubilee (Lev 25:24, Lev 25:26, Lev 25:27), and the price must be settled according to the number of years since the sale and before the jubilee. 3. If the person himself was not able to redeem it, his next kinsman might (Lev 25:25): The redeemer thereof, he that is near unto him, shall come and shall redeem, so it might be read. The kinsman is called Goel, the redeemer (Num 5:8; Rut 3:9), to whom belonged the right of redeeming the land. And this typified Christ, who assumed our nature, that he might be our kinsman, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, and, being the only kinsman we have that is able to do it, to him belonged the right of redemption. As for all our other kinsmen, their shoe must be plucked off (Rut 4:6, Rut 4:7); they cannot redeem. But Christ can and hath redeemed the inheritance which we by sin had forfeited and alienated, and made a new settlement of it upon all that by faith become allied to him. We know that this Redeemer liveth, Job 19:25. And some make this duty of the kinsman to signify the brotherly love that should be among Christians, inclining them to recover those that are fallen, and to restore them with the spirit of meekness. 4. If the land was not redeemed before the year of jubilee, then it should return of course to him that had sold or mortgaged it: In the jubilee it shall go out, Lev 25:28. This was a figure of the free grace of God towards us in Christ, by which, and not by any price or merit of our own, we are restored to the favour of God, and become entitled to paradise, from which our first parents, and we in them, were expelled for disobedience. 5. A difference was made between houses in walled cities, and lands in the country, or houses in country villages. Houses in walled cities were more the fruits of their own industry than land in the country, which was the immediate gift of God's bounty; and therefore, if a man sold a house in a city, he might redeem it any time within a year after the sale, but otherwise it was confirmed to the purchaser for ever, and should not return, no, not at the year of the jubilee, Lev 25:29, Lev 25:30. This provision was made to encourage strangers and proselytes to come and settle among them. Though they could not purchase land in Canaan to them and their heirs, yet they might purchase houses in walled cities, which would be most convenient for those who were supposed to live by trade. But country houses could be disposed of no otherwise than as lands might. 6. A clause is added in favour of the Levites, by way of exception from these rules. (1.) Dwelling houses in the cities of the Levites might be redeemed at any time, and, if not redeemed, should revert in the year of jubilee (Lev 25:32, Lev 25:33), because the Levites had no other possessions than cities and their suburbs, and God would show that the Levites were his peculiar care; and it was for the interest of the public that they should not be impoverished, or wormed out of their inheritances. (2.) The fields adjoining to their cities (Num 35:4, Num 35:5) might not be sold at any time, for they belonged, not to particular Levites, but to the city of the Levites, as a corporation, who could not alienate without a wrong to their tribe; therefore, if any of those fields were sold, the bargain was void, Lev 25:34. Even the Egyptians took care to preserve the land of the priests, Gen 47:22. And there is no less reason for the taking of the maintenance of the gospel ministry under the special protection of Christian governments.
II.A law for the relief of the poor, and the tender usage of poor debtors, and these are of more general and perpetual obligation than the former.
1.The poor must be relieved, Lev 25:35. Here is,
(1.)Our brother's poverty and distress supposed: If thy brother be waxen poor; not only thy brother by nation as a Jew, but thy brother by nature as a man, for it follows, though he be a stranger or a sojourner. All men are to be looked upon and treated as brethren, for we have all one Father, Mal 2:10. Though he is poor, yet still he is thy brother, and is to be loved and owned as a brother. Poverty does not destroy the relation. Though a son of Abraham, yet he may wax poor and fall into decay. Note, Poverty and decay are great grievances, and very common: The poor you have always with you.
(2.)Our duty enjoined: Thou shalt relieve him. By sympathy, pitying the poor; by service, doing for them; and by supply, giving to them according to their necessity and thy ability.
2.Poor debtors must not be oppressed: If thy brother be waxen poor, and have occasion to borrow money of thee for the necessary support of his family, take thou no usury of him, either for money or victuals, Lev 25:36, Lev 25:37. And thus far this law binds still, but could never be thought binding where money is borrowed for purchase of lands, trade, or other improvements; for there it is reasonable that the lender share with the borrower in the profit. The law here is plainly intended for the relief of the poor, to whom it is sometimes as great a charity to lend freely as to give. Observe the arguments here used against extortion. (1.) God patronizes the poor: "Fear thy God, who will reckon with thee for all injuries done to the poor: thou fearest not them, but fear him." (2.) Relieve the poor, that they may live with thee, and some way or other they may be serviceable to thee. The rich can as ill spare the hands of the poor as the poor can the purses of the rich. (3.) The same argument is used to enforce this precept that prefaces all the ten commandments: I am the Lord your God which brought you out of Egypt, Lev 25:38. Note, It becomes those that have received mercy to show mercy. If God has been gracious to us, we ought not to be rigorous with our brethren.
Continue studying Leviticus 25:30 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Leviticus 25:30 delineates a crucial exception to the general Jubilee law regarding property reversion. While agricultural land and houses in unwalled villages were designed to return to their original families in the Jubilee year, this verse specifies that a house sold within a walled city, if not redeemed by the original owner or a kinsman within one full year of its sale, would become the permanent possession of the buyer and his descendants. This provision highlights God's nuanced approach to property law, acknowledging the distinct economic and social realities of urban life compared to the agrarian structure of ancient Israel, and ensuring stability for commercial and residential transactions in cities.
Context
Literary Context
Leviticus 25 comprehensively outlines the laws governing the Sabbatical year (every seventh year) and the Jubilee year (every fiftieth year). The foundational principle underpinning these laws is God's ultimate ownership of the land, with Israelites serving as His tenants, as explicitly stated in Leviticus 25:23. The Jubilee, heralded by the blowing of the ram's horn on the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 25:9), was a transformative time of release. It mandated the return of all land to its original family, the forgiveness of debts, and the liberation of Hebrew slaves (Leviticus 25:10). This intricate system was designed to prevent the permanent accumulation of wealth and land by a few, thereby ensuring social equity, preserving tribal inheritances, and maintaining the economic stability of families. Leviticus 25:30 directly follows and elaborates on Leviticus 25:29, which introduces the one-year redemption period for houses in walled cities. This specific regulation serves as a critical counterpoint to the general land laws, demonstrating the adaptability and practical wisdom embedded within divine legislation to account for different societal structures and functions.
Historical & Cultural Context
Ancient Israel was predominantly an agrarian society, where land ownership was inextricably linked to family identity, tribal inheritance, and economic survival. The Jubilee laws were meticulously crafted to safeguard this foundational structure, ensuring that no family would be permanently dispossessed of their ancestral land, thereby preventing the emergence of a landless underclass. However, cities, particularly those with defensive walls, served distinct functions. They were vibrant centers of trade, commerce, administration, and specialized crafts, rather than primary sites of agricultural production. Property within these urban centers held a different value and purpose, often serving as commercial establishments or permanent residences for those engaged in urban professions. The law articulated in Leviticus 25:30 acknowledges this fundamental distinction, providing a legal framework that encouraged stable urban development, facilitated commercial transactions, and supported the growth of a non-agrarian economy. Unlike rural land, which was tied to family lineage and agricultural cycles, urban dwellings were more akin to commercial assets or permanent homes for those living a city-centric life. This provision reflects God's profound practical wisdom, balancing the ideal of communal equity and familial inheritance with the practical necessities of a developing, multifaceted society.
Key Themes
This verse contributes significantly to several key themes within Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it underscores the theme of God's Sovereignty and Ownership, particularly over the land and its resources, even as He delegates stewardship to humanity. Secondly, it highlights the theme of Justice and Equity within the Israelite community, aiming to prevent the permanent impoverishment of families and the concentration of wealth. The Jubilee system, with its provisions for release and restoration, is a testament to this. Thirdly, and most prominently in this verse, it introduces the theme of Nuance and Adaptability of Divine Law. While the general rule of land reversion is paramount, God's law demonstrates a practical flexibility, recognizing that different types of property (e.g., agricultural land vs. urban dwellings) serve different societal functions and therefore require distinct legal considerations. This adaptability ensures the law's relevance and effectiveness across various aspects of Israelite life, fostering both social cohesion and economic stability.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From the root H1350, gâʼal signifies "to buy back," "to reclaim," "to deliver," or "to act as a kinsman-redeemer." In the context of the Jubilee laws, gâʼal is central to the concept of restoring property or persons to their rightful place or freedom. The failure to "redeem" the house within the specified year meant the forfeiture of this right, indicating that the opportunity for restoration was time-limited and, if missed, resulted in a permanent change of ownership. This term underscores the active responsibility required to reclaim what was lost, highlighting the agency of the original owner or their kinsman.
bayith refers to a dwelling or house, but its meaning extends broadly to encompass a family, household, or even a temple. In this verse, it specifically denotes a residential structure within a walled city. The distinction of the "house" from agricultural land is crucial, as its purpose and economic function differ significantly. The permanence of its sale, unlike land, reflects its role as a stable urban asset rather than an ancestral agricultural inheritance.
yôwbêl literally refers to the ram's horn trumpet, whose blast announced the Jubilee year. By extension, it signifies the year itself—a time of universal release, restoration, and freedom for land, slaves, and debts. The phrase "it shall not go out in the jubile" in this verse emphasizes the unique and permanent exception granted to houses in walled cities. It highlights that these urban properties were exempt from the otherwise universal principle of reversion to original ownership, marking them as distinct from agricultural land under the broader Jubilee framework.
Verse Breakdown
"And if it be not redeemed within the space of a full year"
This initial clause establishes the critical condition for the permanence of the sale. It refers to the one-year redemption period introduced in Leviticus 25:29. If the original owner or a kinsman-redeemer (go'el) did not exercise their legal right to buy back the house within exactly one year from the date of its sale, the opportunity for reclamation was irrevocably lost. This short, fixed period provided clarity, finality, and certainty to urban property transactions, facilitating stable commerce.
"then the house that [is] in the walled city shall be established for ever to him that bought it throughout his generations"
This is the core stipulation of the verse, outlining the consequence of unredeemed urban property. If the redemption period passes without action, the ownership of the house, specifically one located within a walled city, becomes absolute and permanent. The phrases "established for ever" (H6783, tsᵉmîythuth, meaning "to extinction, perpetually") and "throughout his generations" (H1755, dôwr, meaning "an age or generation") signify that the buyer and his descendants gain absolute, perpetual ownership. This stands in stark contrast to the temporary nature of agricultural land sales under the Jubilee system, emphasizing the distinct legal status of urban property crucial for urban stability and investment.
"it shall not go out in the jubile"
This final phrase explicitly states the exception to the fundamental Jubilee principle. Unlike agricultural fields and houses in unwalled villages, which would automatically revert to their original owners in the fiftieth year, houses in walled cities were exempt from this general restoration. This underscores the unique legal status of urban property, reflecting a practical accommodation to the distinct economic and social dynamics of city life versus rural, agrarian existence, ensuring that urban development and commerce could proceed with certainty of ownership.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in Leviticus 25:30 is Legal Exception, a common feature in detailed legal codes. This verse clearly delineates a specific scenario—the sale of houses within walled cities—that deviates from the general, overarching law of the Jubilee, which mandates the return of all land to its original owners. This exception highlights the nuanced and adaptive nature of divine law, demonstrating that God's statutes were not rigid or monolithic but thoughtfully designed to accommodate diverse societal realities and functions. Furthermore, there is a strong element of Contrast evident, as the permanence of urban property sales stands in stark opposition to the temporary, time-limited nature of rural land transactions. This contrast underscores the distinct economic and social functions of city life versus agrarian life in ancient Israel, revealing a sophisticated legal framework that balanced the ideals of social equity and familial inheritance with practical considerations for societal order and economic development. The clarity of the distinction also serves as a form of Emphasis, drawing attention to the unique status of urban dwellings.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Leviticus 25:30 profoundly reveals God's wisdom in crafting laws that are both just and eminently practical, reflecting His ultimate sovereignty over all creation and His meticulous concern for the holistic well-being of His people. While the broader Jubilee laws emphasize God's ultimate ownership of the land and His desire for social equity, preventing perpetual poverty and ensuring the preservation of familial inheritances, this specific provision for urban dwellings demonstrates a nuanced understanding of economic and social realities. It acknowledges that different types of property serve distinct functions within society and therefore require unique legal frameworks to foster stability, encourage investment, and facilitate growth. This delicate balance between divine ideals and practical application underscores the comprehensive nature of God's law, designed not merely for spiritual purity but for the orderly, equitable, and flourishing functioning of human society, demonstrating His profound wisdom in governance.
Reflection and Application
Leviticus 25:30 offers a profound lesson in the nuanced application of divine principles, reminding us that while God's character and foundational truths are immutable, the specific outworking of His will can be adapted to diverse contexts and practical realities. For ancient Israel, this meant balancing the ideal of land reversion for agrarian equity with the need for stable urban commerce and residency. For believers today, this verse encourages a thoughtful and discerning approach to biblical interpretation and application. It cautions against a rigid, one-size-fits-all approach to scripture, urging us to consider the specific context, purpose, and intended scope of each command. We are called to seek God's wisdom in applying timeless truths to our complex modern world, understanding that true justice often involves balancing competing goods and adapting principles with discernment for the holistic well-being of individuals and communities. This passage reminds us that God's laws are not arbitrary burdens but are designed for human flourishing, demonstrating His practical wisdom in governing His people and providing a framework for a just and orderly society. It prompts us to consider how we might apply divine wisdom with both faithfulness to principle and flexibility in practice, ensuring our actions genuinely promote human flourishing and reflect God's comprehensive care.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was there an exception for houses in walled cities compared to open land?
The exception for houses in walled cities (Leviticus 25:30) reflects the distinct economic and social functions of urban versus rural property in ancient Israel. Agricultural land was intrinsically tied to family inheritance and tribal identity, serving as the primary means of sustenance and economic security for an agrarian society. The Jubilee ensured this land always returned to its original family, preventing permanent landlessness and maintaining social equity. Walled cities, however, were centers of trade, commerce, and specialized crafts. Houses within these cities were often commercial properties or permanent residences for non-agricultural workers. Allowing the permanent sale of urban houses fostered stability for urban transactions, encouraged investment and development within cities, and recognized that urban life operated under different economic principles than the agrarian system. It was a practical accommodation within God's broader legal framework, demonstrating His wisdom in providing laws suited to diverse societal needs.
Did the Jubilee law apply to all property sales in ancient Israel?
No, the general Jubilee law, which mandated the return of property to its original owners, primarily applied to agricultural land and houses in unwalled villages (Leviticus 25:28). As Leviticus 25:30 clearly states, houses within walled cities were a notable exception. If not redeemed within one year, these urban houses became the permanent possession of the buyer and did not revert in the Jubilee. This distinction highlights the nuanced nature of God's law, which provided different regulations for different types of property based on their societal function and economic purpose, ensuring a balanced and just system for all aspects of Israelite life.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The nuanced provisions of the Jubilee law, particularly the distinction found in Leviticus 25:30, ultimately point to the superior and permanent redemption offered in Christ. While the Old Testament Jubilee provided a temporal and conditional release from debt and a return of physical inheritance, it was a shadow of the eternal spiritual Jubilee inaugurated by Jesus. The temporary nature of the earthly inheritance and the need for repeated redemption under the Old Covenant laws (Hebrews 9:12) highlight the insufficiency of human efforts and legal systems to bring about ultimate freedom and restoration. Christ, through His once-for-all sacrifice on the cross, is the ultimate Kinsman-Redeemer (Galatians 3:13), who has purchased us with His own precious blood, securing for us an eternal inheritance that can never be lost or forfeited (Ephesians 1:11). Unlike the house in the walled city that became permanently owned by the buyer, believers are permanently established in Christ, receiving an inheritance that "will never perish, spoil or fade" (1 Peter 1:4). Jesus Himself proclaimed the "year of the Lord's favor" (Luke 4:18-19) signifying the spiritual Jubilee where true freedom from sin and death is found, and a permanent, spiritual "house" in God's eternal city is secured for all who believe (Hebrews 11:10; Revelation 21:2). In Christ, the temporary provisions of the Old Covenant find their eternal and unshakeable fulfillment, establishing believers in an unshakeable kingdom (Hebrews 12:28).