- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 25:23–38. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. A law concerning the real estates of the Israelites in the land of Canaan, and the transferring of them. 1. No land should be sold for ever from the family to whose lot it fell in the division of the land. And the reason given is, The land is mine, and you are strangers and sojourners with me, Lev 25:23. (1.) God having a particular propriety in this land, he would by this restraint keep them sensible of it. The possessions of good people, who, having given up themselves to God, have therewith given up all they have to him, are in a particular manner at his disposal, and his disposal of them must be submitted to. (2.) They being strangers and sojourners with him in that land, and having his tabernacle among them, to alienate their part of that land would be in effect to cut themselves off from their fellowship and communion with God, of which that was a token and symbol, for which reason Naboth would rather incur the wrath of a king than part with the inheritance of his fathers, Kg1 21:3. 2. If a man was constrained through poverty to sell his land for the subsistence of his family, yet, if afterwards he was able, he might redeem it before the year of jubilee (Lev 25:24, Lev 25:26, Lev 25:27), and the price must be settled according to the number of years since the sale and before the jubilee. 3. If the person himself was not able to redeem it, his next kinsman might (Lev 25:25): The redeemer thereof, he that is near unto him, shall come and shall redeem, so it might be read. The kinsman is called Goel, the redeemer (Num 5:8; Rut 3:9), to whom belonged the right of redeeming the land. And this typified Christ, who assumed our nature, that he might be our kinsman, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, and, being the only kinsman we have that is able to do it, to him belonged the right of redemption. As for all our other kinsmen, their shoe must be plucked off (Rut 4:6, Rut 4:7); they cannot redeem. But Christ can and hath redeemed the inheritance which we by sin had forfeited and alienated, and made a new settlement of it upon all that by faith become allied to him. We know that this Redeemer liveth, Job 19:25. And some make this duty of the kinsman to signify the brotherly love that should be among Christians, inclining them to recover those that are fallen, and to restore them with the spirit of meekness. 4. If the land was not redeemed before the year of jubilee, then it should return of course to him that had sold or mortgaged it: In the jubilee it shall go out, Lev 25:28. This was a figure of the free grace of God towards us in Christ, by which, and not by any price or merit of our own, we are restored to the favour of God, and become entitled to paradise, from which our first parents, and we in them, were expelled for disobedience. 5. A difference was made between houses in walled cities, and lands in the country, or houses in country villages. Houses in walled cities were more the fruits of their own industry than land in the country, which was the immediate gift of God's bounty; and therefore, if a man sold a house in a city, he might redeem it any time within a year after the sale, but otherwise it was confirmed to the purchaser for ever, and should not return, no, not at the year of the jubilee, Lev 25:29, Lev 25:30. This provision was made to encourage strangers and proselytes to come and settle among them. Though they could not purchase land in Canaan to them and their heirs, yet they might purchase houses in walled cities, which would be most convenient for those who were supposed to live by trade. But country houses could be disposed of no otherwise than as lands might. 6. A clause is added in favour of the Levites, by way of exception from these rules. (1.) Dwelling houses in the cities of the Levites might be redeemed at any time, and, if not redeemed, should revert in the year of jubilee (Lev 25:32, Lev 25:33), because the Levites had no other possessions than cities and their suburbs, and God would show that the Levites were his peculiar care; and it was for the interest of the public that they should not be impoverished, or wormed out of their inheritances. (2.) The fields adjoining to their cities (Num 35:4, Num 35:5) might not be sold at any time, for they belonged, not to particular Levites, but to the city of the Levites, as a corporation, who could not alienate without a wrong to their tribe; therefore, if any of those fields were sold, the bargain was void, Lev 25:34. Even the Egyptians took care to preserve the land of the priests, Gen 47:22. And there is no less reason for the taking of the maintenance of the gospel ministry under the special protection of Christian governments.
II.A law for the relief of the poor, and the tender usage of poor debtors, and these are of more general and perpetual obligation than the former.
1.The poor must be relieved, Lev 25:35. Here is,
(1.)Our brother's poverty and distress supposed: If thy brother be waxen poor; not only thy brother by nation as a Jew, but thy brother by nature as a man, for it follows, though he be a stranger or a sojourner. All men are to be looked upon and treated as brethren, for we have all one Father, Mal 2:10. Though he is poor, yet still he is thy brother, and is to be loved and owned as a brother. Poverty does not destroy the relation. Though a son of Abraham, yet he may wax poor and fall into decay. Note, Poverty and decay are great grievances, and very common: The poor you have always with you.
(2.)Our duty enjoined: Thou shalt relieve him. By sympathy, pitying the poor; by service, doing for them; and by supply, giving to them according to their necessity and thy ability.
2.Poor debtors must not be oppressed: If thy brother be waxen poor, and have occasion to borrow money of thee for the necessary support of his family, take thou no usury of him, either for money or victuals, Lev 25:36, Lev 25:37. And thus far this law binds still, but could never be thought binding where money is borrowed for purchase of lands, trade, or other improvements; for there it is reasonable that the lender share with the borrower in the profit. The law here is plainly intended for the relief of the poor, to whom it is sometimes as great a charity to lend freely as to give. Observe the arguments here used against extortion. (1.) God patronizes the poor: "Fear thy God, who will reckon with thee for all injuries done to the poor: thou fearest not them, but fear him." (2.) Relieve the poor, that they may live with thee, and some way or other they may be serviceable to thee. The rich can as ill spare the hands of the poor as the poor can the purses of the rich. (3.) The same argument is used to enforce this precept that prefaces all the ten commandments: I am the Lord your God which brought you out of Egypt, Lev 25:38. Note, It becomes those that have received mercy to show mercy. If God has been gracious to us, we ought not to be rigorous with our brethren.
Continue studying Leviticus 25:29 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Leviticus 25:29 outlines a specific regulation within Israel's intricate Jubilee and Sabbatical laws, detailing the sale and redemption of dwelling houses situated within walled cities. Distinct from agricultural land, which was subject to reversion in the Year of Jubilee, urban houses were afforded a unique provision: the original seller retained an exclusive right to repurchase, or redeem, their property within a strict one-year period from the date of sale. This statute reflects God's nuanced concern for social stability and the prevention of permanent destitution, even amidst commercial transactions, while acknowledging the distinct economic and social nature of urban property compared to ancestral land.
Context
Literary Context
Leviticus 25 is a cornerstone chapter in the Pentateuch, articulating God's profound laws governing the Sabbatical Year (every seventh year) and the Jubilee Year (every fiftieth year) for ancient Israel. These laws fundamentally shaped land ownership, debt, and personal liberty, all predicated on the foundational theological principle declared in Leviticus 25:23: "The land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me." This divine ownership meant that agricultural land, intrinsically linked to tribal inheritance, could not be permanently alienated but was destined to revert to its original family in the Jubilee. However, Leviticus 25:29 introduces a critical exception to this general rule, specifically for houses located within walled cities. This provision distinguishes them sharply from both agricultural fields (governed by Leviticus 25:23-28) and houses in unwalled villages (which, as Leviticus 25:31 clarifies, were treated akin to open land). Thus, Leviticus 25:29, along with the subsequent Leviticus 25:30, establishes a unique and specific legal framework for urban dwellings, highlighting the meticulous nature of God's covenantal instructions.
Historical & Cultural Context
Ancient Israel was predominantly an agrarian society, where land ownership was not merely an economic asset but was deeply interwoven with tribal identity, family sustenance, and the fulfillment of God's covenantal promises regarding the Promised Land. In contrast, cities, particularly those fortified with defensive walls, functioned as vital centers for commerce, administration, and concentrated populations. Houses within these walled urban centers were often perceived more as personal residences or commercial properties rather than integral components of the tribal agricultural inheritance. The legal distinction articulated in Leviticus 25:29 likely arose from this practical reality: urban property transactions required a degree of finality to facilitate trade, encourage investment, and support urban development, a need less critical for agricultural land tied to the long-term, divinely ordained tribal economy. The one-year redemption window provided a brief, compassionate grace period, allowing a seller who might have been compelled to sell due to financial distress an opportunity to recover and repurchase their home, thereby offering a crucial measure of social safety within the urban economic sphere. After this stipulated year, the sale became permanent, reflecting a more commercial understanding of such property compared to the divinely mandated inalienability of ancestral agricultural land.
Key Themes
This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes within Leviticus 25 and broader biblical theology. Foremost is the theme of God's Sovereignty and Ownership, particularly over the land and, by extension, all property. The laws of Jubilee and redemption underscore that ultimate ownership rests with God, and human possession is always stewardship. Another key theme is Justice and Social Equity, as the provisions for redemption, even limited for urban houses, demonstrate God's concern for preventing permanent poverty and ensuring opportunities for recovery for the vulnerable within the community. It reflects a divine desire to mitigate the harshness of economic misfortune. The concept of Redemption itself is central, both in its literal, legal sense of buying back property and, more profoundly, in its foreshadowing of spiritual redemption. Finally, the verse highlights the theme of Distinction and Nuance in Law, showing that God's laws are not monolithic but are carefully tailored to specific contexts and types of property, balancing ideal theological principles with practical societal realities. This careful delineation underscores the wisdom and adaptability inherent in divine legislation.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
While the verse specifies "dwelling house," the core Hebrew term bayith encompasses a broad range of meanings, from a literal physical structure (house, palace, temple) to more abstract concepts like family, household, or even a lineage. In this context, it refers to a residential structure, emphasizing its role as a personal abode or family dwelling. The choice of "dwelling house" highlights its primary function as a place of habitation, making its sale and potential loss particularly impactful for an individual or family.
Although the KJV translates this as the verb "redeem," the Strong's number H1353 points to the noun gᵉʼullâh, meaning "redemption." This noun encapsulates the act, right, and object of redemption. It is derived from the verb ga'al, "to redeem" or "to act as a kinsman-redeemer." In Leviticus 25:29, the use of gᵉʼullâh (implied by the Strong's mapping to the verb "redeem") signifies the legal right and opportunity for the original owner to buy back their property. This concept is foundational to the Jubilee laws, representing the restoration of what was lost or alienated, often through the intervention of a qualified kinsman or, as here, the original owner themselves. It speaks to the temporary nature of certain transactions and God's provision for reversal and recovery.
The term yôwm, often translated as "day," is used here in a broader, figurative sense to denote a period of time, specifically a "full year" or "whole year." Its definition includes "year" and "full age." This usage underscores the precise and limited timeframe granted for redemption. Unlike agricultural land, which could be redeemed at any point until the Jubilee, the urban dwelling had a strict, non-negotiable one-year window. The concept of yôwm here emphasizes the finality and boundedness of this specific legal provision, highlighting the difference in treatment for various types of property.
Verse Breakdown
"And if a man sell a dwelling house in a walled city"
This opening clause meticulously defines the specific conditions under which this unique law applies. It identifies the subject as "a man" (an individual), the action as "sell," and crucially, the object as "a dwelling house" located "in a walled city." This precise geographical and structural designation immediately sets this property apart from other forms of property addressed elsewhere in Leviticus 25, establishing the narrow scope of the subsequent redemption provision.
"then he may redeem it within a whole year after it is sold;"
This segment introduces the core legal provision: the original seller is granted a specific and limited timeframe—"a whole year"—during which they retain the exclusive right to repurchase, or redeem, their sold property. This period functions as a divinely ordained grace period, a safety net, or an opportunity for the seller to recover financially and reclaim their home. It reflects God's compassionate concern for those facing economic distress, preventing permanent displacement from their urban residence.
"[within] a full year may he redeem it."
This repetition of the one-year redemption period serves to powerfully emphasize the strictness, finality, and non-negotiable nature of this timeframe. The reiteration underscores that, unlike agricultural land which could be redeemed at any time until the Jubilee, the right to redeem an urban dwelling was strictly time-bound. After this stipulated year, the sale became permanent, and the property did not revert in the Jubilee, a crucial distinction elaborated in the subsequent verse, Leviticus 25:30.
Literary Devices
The text of Leviticus 25:29 employs several literary devices to convey its meaning with clarity, authority, and emphasis. Legal Precision is paramount, as the verse uses highly specific terminology such as "dwelling house," "walled city," and "whole year" to define the exact scope and limitations of the law. This meticulous detail is characteristic of legal codes throughout the Pentateuch, ensuring no ambiguity regarding its application and the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved. Contrast is implicitly but powerfully used; by setting this law apart, the text highlights the distinct treatment of urban dwellings compared to agricultural land (which reverts in the Jubilee) and houses in unwalled villages (which are treated like open land). This differentiation emphasizes the unique legal category assigned to urban property, reflecting practical societal needs within the divine legal framework. Finally, Emphasis through Repetition is evident in the phrase "within a whole year... [within] a full year." This reiteration of the one-year limit reinforces and underscores the strict, non-negotiable nature of the redemption period for houses in walled cities, highlighting the finality of the transaction once this narrow window closes.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Leviticus 25:29, though a precise legal provision, unveils profound theological truths about God's character and His divine design for human society. It powerfully demonstrates God's unwavering concern for justice, social equity, and the prevention of permanent destitution within His covenant community. While acknowledging the practicalities and commercial necessities of urban property transactions, God nonetheless instituted a mechanism for recovery, reflecting His compassionate nature and desire to provide a safety net for the vulnerable. The concept of "redemption" (Hebrew: gᵉʼullâh) is a central theological theme, not only in this verse but throughout Leviticus 25 and indeed the entire biblical narrative, pointing to God's restorative power and His ultimate ownership of all things. Even in this limited, earthly context of buying back property, the principle foreshadows a greater, spiritual redemption that God Himself would accomplish.
Reflection and Application
Leviticus 25:29, despite its ancient and highly specific context, offers enduring principles for reflection and application in contemporary life. It serves as a poignant reminder that God is intimately concerned with the economic and social well-being of His people, establishing laws that meticulously balance individual rights with communal stability and crucial opportunities for recovery. This passage challenges us to deeply consider our own understanding of ownership and stewardship, prompting us to recognize that all our possessions are ultimately temporary and belong to God, who is the ultimate owner of all things. The provision for redemption, even if time-limited, speaks volumes about God's desire to prevent permanent loss and to offer a chance for restoration and a fresh start. For us today, this passage encourages us to actively work towards building economic and social systems that genuinely reflect God's justice and mercy, providing robust safety nets and equitable opportunities for those facing hardship, rather than allowing unchecked accumulation of wealth or the permanent disadvantage of the vulnerable. It calls us to embody a spirit of radical generosity and profound compassion, understanding that our material wealth and resources are a sacred trust from God, to be managed in ways that honor Him supremely and serve the needs of others justly.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was there a different rule for houses in walled cities compared to agricultural land?
The distinction in law for houses in walled cities, as detailed in Leviticus 25:29, arose from the differing functions and theological significance of these types of property in ancient Israel. Agricultural land was intrinsically tied to tribal inheritance, family livelihood, and the foundational covenantal promise of God's ultimate ownership over the land, as declared in Leviticus 25:23. It was designed to revert to the original family in the Jubilee Year to prevent permanent loss of ancestral livelihood and to ensure the perpetuation of tribal identity and economic stability. Houses within walled cities, however, were viewed more as personal or commercial assets. These urban dwellings were not directly linked to the agrarian economy or the system of tribal land distribution. The limited one-year redemption period for urban houses balanced the seller's need for a temporary safety net (a chance to recover financially and repurchase their home) with the buyer's desire for a more final and stable transaction in an urban, commercial context. After this specified year, the sale became permanent, as explicitly stated in Leviticus 25:30, unlike agricultural land which would always revert in the Jubilee. This distinction highlights God's nuanced and practical approach to property law, recognizing the diverse realities and needs associated with different types of assets within society.
What does "redeem" mean in this context?
In Leviticus 25:29, "redeem" (related to the Hebrew noun gᵉʼullâh, meaning "redemption") signifies the legal right and opportunity for the original owner to buy back or reclaim the property that was sold. It refers specifically to the seller's exclusive right to repurchase their dwelling house within a precise, limited timeframe—one full year from the date of sale. This concept of redemption is a central theme throughout the laws of Leviticus 25, where it applies not only to houses but also to land and even persons sold into servitude. It emphasizes the temporary nature of certain sales or indentured servitude and underscores God's compassionate provision for restoration and the reversal of misfortune. It serves as a legal mechanism designed to prevent permanent loss of property and to ensure a measure of social and economic recovery for the seller, reflecting God's concern for justice and equity within the community.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The earthly concept of redemption in Leviticus 25:29, where a person could buy back a lost possession within a limited timeframe, serves as a profound and vital shadow of the ultimate spiritual redemption accomplished by Jesus Christ. Just as the Mosaic law provided a temporary means for an Israelite to recover what was lost due to economic hardship, Christ, our divine Kinsman-Redeemer, provided the permanent and complete means for humanity to be restored to God. We, like the "dwelling house" sold into another's possession, were alienated from our true spiritual inheritance and enslaved by the dominion of sin and death, with the dire consequence of eternal separation from God (Romans 6:23). Jesus, being fully God and fully man, was uniquely qualified to "redeem" us, paying the ultimate, incalculable price not with perishable silver or gold, but with His own precious and sinless blood (1 Peter 1:18-19). Through His perfect sacrifice on the cross, He has bought us back from the dominion of darkness and triumphantly transferred us into the glorious kingdom of His beloved Son (Colossians 1:13-14). Unlike the one-year limit for urban houses, Christ's redemption is eternal and irreversible, securing for us an imperishable inheritance and a permanent dwelling place in God's presence, prepared for us in heaven (John 14:2-3, Ephesians 1:7). He not only reclaims us from bondage but radically transforms us, making us new creations in Him and adopted as beloved heirs of God's boundless promises (2 Corinthians 5:17, Galatians 4:4-7).