- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 25:23–38. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. A law concerning the real estates of the Israelites in the land of Canaan, and the transferring of them. 1. No land should be sold for ever from the family to whose lot it fell in the division of the land. And the reason given is, The land is mine, and you are strangers and sojourners with me, Lev 25:23. (1.) God having a particular propriety in this land, he would by this restraint keep them sensible of it. The possessions of good people, who, having given up themselves to God, have therewith given up all they have to him, are in a particular manner at his disposal, and his disposal of them must be submitted to. (2.) They being strangers and sojourners with him in that land, and having his tabernacle among them, to alienate their part of that land would be in effect to cut themselves off from their fellowship and communion with God, of which that was a token and symbol, for which reason Naboth would rather incur the wrath of a king than part with the inheritance of his fathers, Kg1 21:3. 2. If a man was constrained through poverty to sell his land for the subsistence of his family, yet, if afterwards he was able, he might redeem it before the year of jubilee (Lev 25:24, Lev 25:26, Lev 25:27), and the price must be settled according to the number of years since the sale and before the jubilee. 3. If the person himself was not able to redeem it, his next kinsman might (Lev 25:25): The redeemer thereof, he that is near unto him, shall come and shall redeem, so it might be read. The kinsman is called Goel, the redeemer (Num 5:8; Rut 3:9), to whom belonged the right of redeeming the land. And this typified Christ, who assumed our nature, that he might be our kinsman, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, and, being the only kinsman we have that is able to do it, to him belonged the right of redemption. As for all our other kinsmen, their shoe must be plucked off (Rut 4:6, Rut 4:7); they cannot redeem. But Christ can and hath redeemed the inheritance which we by sin had forfeited and alienated, and made a new settlement of it upon all that by faith become allied to him. We know that this Redeemer liveth, Job 19:25. And some make this duty of the kinsman to signify the brotherly love that should be among Christians, inclining them to recover those that are fallen, and to restore them with the spirit of meekness. 4. If the land was not redeemed before the year of jubilee, then it should return of course to him that had sold or mortgaged it: In the jubilee it shall go out, Lev 25:28. This was a figure of the free grace of God towards us in Christ, by which, and not by any price or merit of our own, we are restored to the favour of God, and become entitled to paradise, from which our first parents, and we in them, were expelled for disobedience. 5. A difference was made between houses in walled cities, and lands in the country, or houses in country villages. Houses in walled cities were more the fruits of their own industry than land in the country, which was the immediate gift of God's bounty; and therefore, if a man sold a house in a city, he might redeem it any time within a year after the sale, but otherwise it was confirmed to the purchaser for ever, and should not return, no, not at the year of the jubilee, Lev 25:29, Lev 25:30. This provision was made to encourage strangers and proselytes to come and settle among them. Though they could not purchase land in Canaan to them and their heirs, yet they might purchase houses in walled cities, which would be most convenient for those who were supposed to live by trade. But country houses could be disposed of no otherwise than as lands might. 6. A clause is added in favour of the Levites, by way of exception from these rules. (1.) Dwelling houses in the cities of the Levites might be redeemed at any time, and, if not redeemed, should revert in the year of jubilee (Lev 25:32, Lev 25:33), because the Levites had no other possessions than cities and their suburbs, and God would show that the Levites were his peculiar care; and it was for the interest of the public that they should not be impoverished, or wormed out of their inheritances. (2.) The fields adjoining to their cities (Num 35:4, Num 35:5) might not be sold at any time, for they belonged, not to particular Levites, but to the city of the Levites, as a corporation, who could not alienate without a wrong to their tribe; therefore, if any of those fields were sold, the bargain was void, Lev 25:34. Even the Egyptians took care to preserve the land of the priests, Gen 47:22. And there is no less reason for the taking of the maintenance of the gospel ministry under the special protection of Christian governments.
II.A law for the relief of the poor, and the tender usage of poor debtors, and these are of more general and perpetual obligation than the former.
1.The poor must be relieved, Lev 25:35. Here is,
(1.)Our brother's poverty and distress supposed: If thy brother be waxen poor; not only thy brother by nation as a Jew, but thy brother by nature as a man, for it follows, though he be a stranger or a sojourner. All men are to be looked upon and treated as brethren, for we have all one Father, Mal 2:10. Though he is poor, yet still he is thy brother, and is to be loved and owned as a brother. Poverty does not destroy the relation. Though a son of Abraham, yet he may wax poor and fall into decay. Note, Poverty and decay are great grievances, and very common: The poor you have always with you.
(2.)Our duty enjoined: Thou shalt relieve him. By sympathy, pitying the poor; by service, doing for them; and by supply, giving to them according to their necessity and thy ability.
2.Poor debtors must not be oppressed: If thy brother be waxen poor, and have occasion to borrow money of thee for the necessary support of his family, take thou no usury of him, either for money or victuals, Lev 25:36, Lev 25:37. And thus far this law binds still, but could never be thought binding where money is borrowed for purchase of lands, trade, or other improvements; for there it is reasonable that the lender share with the borrower in the profit. The law here is plainly intended for the relief of the poor, to whom it is sometimes as great a charity to lend freely as to give. Observe the arguments here used against extortion. (1.) God patronizes the poor: "Fear thy God, who will reckon with thee for all injuries done to the poor: thou fearest not them, but fear him." (2.) Relieve the poor, that they may live with thee, and some way or other they may be serviceable to thee. The rich can as ill spare the hands of the poor as the poor can the purses of the rich. (3.) The same argument is used to enforce this precept that prefaces all the ten commandments: I am the Lord your God which brought you out of Egypt, Lev 25:38. Note, It becomes those that have received mercy to show mercy. If God has been gracious to us, we ought not to be rigorous with our brethren.
Continue studying Leviticus 25:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Leviticus 25:26 outlines a crucial provision within the Mosaic Law concerning the redemption of ancestral land in Israel. It stipulates that if a family's inherited property, sold due to economic hardship, cannot be repurchased by a kinsman-redeemer, the original owner retains the right to buy it back themselves should their financial circumstances improve. This clause underscores God's meticulous care for economic justice, the preservation of family inheritance, and the foundational principle that all land ultimately belongs to Him, ensuring pathways for restoration and preventing permanent dispossession within the covenant community.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is an integral part of Leviticus 25, a chapter primarily dedicated to the laws governing the Sabbatical Year and the Jubilee Year. These laws establish a divine framework for land ownership, debt, and personal freedom, emphasizing God's ultimate sovereignty over the land and His desire for social equity. The preceding verses, particularly Leviticus 25:23 and Leviticus 25:25, lay the groundwork by stating that "the land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine" and outlining the primary role of the kinsman-redeemer (Hebrew: go'el) in repurchasing sold property. Leviticus 25:26 then introduces an alternative scenario, ensuring that even in the absence of an able kinsman, the original owner has a pathway to restoration, demonstrating the comprehensive nature of God's provision for economic justice and family stability within the covenant.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, land was far more than a mere commodity; it was the foundation of a family's identity, economic security, and covenant blessing, allocated by God through tribal and family lots (Numbers 34). Losing one's ancestral land, typically due to poverty or debt, was a profound blow, threatening a family's livelihood, social standing, and connection to their heritage. The concept of "redemption" (Hebrew: ga'al) was deeply embedded in Israelite society, extending to property, persons, and even avenging wrongs. The go'el (kinsman-redeemer) was a vital figure, responsible for upholding family rights and ensuring the continuation of the family line and its inheritance, as vividly portrayed in the book of Ruth. This verse, therefore, reflects a society where economic vulnerability was a constant concern, but also one where divine law provided a comprehensive safety net designed to prevent the permanent disenfranchisement of families and to uphold the theological principle that God remained the ultimate owner and provider of all resources.
Key Themes
Leviticus 25:26 contributes significantly to several major theological and narrative themes within the book of Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it reinforces the theme of God's Sovereignty over the Land, emphasizing that human ownership is provisional and God retains ultimate title. Secondly, it highlights Economic Justice and Compassion for the Vulnerable, providing mechanisms to prevent perpetual poverty and the permanent loss of family inheritance, ensuring that even those who fall on hard times have a pathway to restoration. Thirdly, the verse underscores the theme of Redemption and Restoration, showcasing God's desire to restore what was lost due to hardship, whether through a kinsman or by the individual's own renewed capacity. Finally, it speaks to the Importance of Family and Inheritance, as the laws are meticulously designed to preserve the tribal and familial land allotments given by God, which were central to Israel's identity and covenant blessings (Joshua 14).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primitive root verb signifies the act of buying back, reclaiming, or restoring something that was lost, sold, or forfeited, typically through the payment of a price. The term carries strong connotations of kinship responsibility and the restoration of a prior state or relationship. In the context of land, it means to reacquire ownership of property that had been alienated. The broader theological implication is the restoration of relationship or status through intervention, highlighting God's character as a restorer and the importance of familial obligation within the covenant community.
While literally meaning "hand," in this context, the Hebrew word יָד (yâd) is used idiomatically to denote ability, power, or means, particularly financial capacity or resources. The phrase "himself be able to redeem it" means that the individual has acquired the necessary resources or strength to perform the act of redemption. This highlights personal agency and improved circumstances as a pathway to restoration, distinct from reliance on a kinsman, yet still within God's overarching framework of provision and the temporary nature of land sales.
Verse Breakdown
"And if the man have none to redeem it"
This initial clause addresses a specific contingency: the absence of a kinsman-redeemer (go'el) who is willing or able to fulfill their familial obligation to repurchase the sold land. This scenario highlights a potential vulnerability within the system of land redemption, acknowledging that the primary, communal safety net might not always be available. It sets the stage for an alternative provision, demonstrating the law's comprehensive foresight in addressing various practical situations that could arise among the Israelites.
"and himself be able to redeem it"
This second clause introduces the alternative pathway for restoration. It posits that the original owner, who previously sold their land due to poverty, has now experienced a change in fortune. They have acquired sufficient resources, means, or financial capacity ("be able") to buy back their own property. This provision ensures that the individual's improved financial standing can directly lead to the recovery of their ancestral inheritance, reinforcing the principle of personal responsibility and the temporary nature of land sales within God's economy, even in the absence of a kinsman's intervention.
Literary Devices
Leviticus 25:26, though concise, employs several subtle literary techniques characteristic of legal texts within the Pentateuch. The structure itself presents a clear Conditional Clause, "And if the man have none to redeem it, and himself be able to redeem it," which sets forth a specific circumstance and its implied legal consequence within the Mosaic Law. This precise legal language is designed for clarity and comprehensiveness in outlining various scenarios for land redemption. There is an implicit Contrast between the initial state of poverty that necessitated the sale of land and the later state of "being able" to redeem it, highlighting a journey from economic distress to restoration. Furthermore, the verse functions as a specific application of the broader theological Symbolism of redemption, where the physical act of buying back land foreshadows a deeper spiritual truth about restoration from bondage or loss, a theme that permeates the entire biblical narrative of God's redemptive plan.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Leviticus 25:26 profoundly illustrates God's concern for justice, mercy, and the preservation of family inheritance within the covenant community. It underscores the principle that human ownership is always provisional, with God retaining ultimate sovereignty over the land, as declared in Leviticus 25:23. The provision for self-redemption, alongside kinsman-redemption, demonstrates a comprehensive divine safety net designed to prevent permanent economic disenfranchisement and to ensure that poverty did not lead to an irreversible loss of one's heritage. This reflects a theology of restoration, where pathways are always available for those who have fallen on hard times to regain their standing and livelihood, reflecting God's character as a provider who cares for the vulnerable and seeks to maintain equity within His people. It also subtly emphasizes human responsibility and diligence in seeking to improve one's circumstances, even while relying on God's overarching provision.
Reflection and Application
While the specific laws of land redemption belong to ancient Israel's agrarian society, the principles embedded in Leviticus 25:26 resonate deeply with contemporary life. This verse offers a powerful message of hope and resilience: even when external help (like a kinsman-redeemer) is unavailable or insufficient, God's design allows for personal agency and the possibility of self-restoration. It encourages us to cultivate diligence, wise stewardship, and a hopeful outlook, believing that circumstances can improve, and we can, by God's grace, regain what was lost—whether it be financial stability, relational health, or spiritual vitality. It reminds us that God provides multiple avenues for recovery and that our improved "ability" or resources should be leveraged not just for personal gain, but for the restoration of what is right and just, reflecting God's own character of mercy and provision. This perspective fosters a sense of responsibility for our own journey while acknowledging the ultimate source of all blessing and the importance of using our restored capacity to honor Him and bless others.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is the significance of "the land is mine" in relation to this verse?
The declaration "the land is mine" in Leviticus 25:23 is foundational to understanding all land laws in Israel, including Leviticus 25:26. It signifies that God is the ultimate owner of all creation, and the Israelites were merely stewards of the land He graciously provided. This theological premise prevented permanent land sales, ensuring that no family could be perpetually dispossessed of their ancestral inheritance. It meant that any sale was essentially a lease until the Jubilee year, or until it could be redeemed, reinforcing God's sovereignty and His commitment to economic justice and the stability of families within the covenant community.
How does this verse relate to the concept of the Jubilee Year?
Leviticus 25:26 operates within the broader framework of the Jubilee Year, which is detailed in Leviticus 25:8-12. The Jubilee, occurring every 50 years, was the ultimate mechanism for land restoration, debt cancellation, and the release of indentured servants. If land was not redeemed by a kinsman or the owner themselves before the Jubilee, it would automatically revert to its original family in the Jubilee year, regardless of who owned it. Leviticus 25:26 provides an earlier opportunity for redemption, allowing the owner to regain their property as soon as they are able, rather than waiting potentially many years until the Jubilee. It underscores God's desire for immediate restoration when possible, while the Jubilee served as a final, overarching safety net, guaranteeing that no family's inheritance would be permanently lost.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Leviticus 25:26, with its provision for self-redemption of lost inheritance, beautifully foreshadows the ultimate spiritual redemption found in Jesus Christ. While the Old Testament law provided for a human to redeem their own property if they became "able" through improved circumstances, humanity, in its fallen state, was utterly unable to redeem itself from the bondage of sin and death. The New Testament reveals that we were "sold under sin" (Romans 7:14) and in desperate need of a Redeemer. Jesus Christ, the perfect Kinsman-Redeemer, stepped into our humanity, not to buy back land, but to purchase us back from the slavery of sin, paying the ultimate price with His own precious blood (1 Peter 1:18-19). Unlike the Israelite who might become "able" to redeem their land, we are entirely dependent on Christ's finished work; our redemption is not by our own ability or merit, but by His infinite grace and unmerited favor (Ephesians 2:8-9). He is the one who restores our lost inheritance—not of earthly land, but of eternal life, sonship, and unbroken communion with God (Colossians 1:13-14). Thus, the temporary, earthly redemption in Leviticus points to the eternal, spiritual redemption accomplished by Christ, who alone was "able" to redeem us completely and perfectly, securing for us an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading (1 Peter 1:4).