TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Acts 22:22–30. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Paul was going on with this account of himself, had shown them his commission to preach among the Gentiles without any peevish reflections upon the Jews, and we may suppose designed next to show how he was afterwards, by a special direction of the Holy Ghost at Antioch, separated to this service, how tender he was of the Jews, how respectful to them, and how careful to give them the precedency in all places whither he came, and to unite Jews and Gentiles in one body; and then to show how wonderfully God had owned him, and what good service had been done to the interest of God's kingdom among men in general, without damage to any of the true interests of the Jewish church in particular. But, whatever he designs to say, they resolve he shall say no more to them: They gave him audience to this word. Hitherto they had heard him with patience and some attention. But when he speaks of being sent to the Gentiles, though it was what Christ himself said to him, they cannot bear it, not so much as to hear the Gentiles named, such an enmity had they to them, and such a jealousy of them. Upon the mention of this, they have no manner of patience, but forget all rules of decency and equity; thus were they provoked to jealousy by those that were no people, Rom 10:19.
Now here we are told how furious and outrageous the people were against Paul, for mentioning the Gentiles as taken into the cognizance of divine grace, and so justifying his preaching among them.
I.They interrupted him, by lifting up their voice, to put him into confusion, and that nobody might hear a word he said.
Galled consciences kick at the least touch; and those who are resolved not to be rules by reason commonly resolve not to hear it if they can help it. And the spirit of enmity against the gospel of Christ commonly shows itself in silencing the ministers of Christ and his gospel, and stopping their mouths, as the Jews did Paul's here. Their fathers had said to the best of seers, See not, Isa 30:10. And so they to the best of speakers, Speak not. Forbear, wherefore shouldst thou be smitten? Ch2 25:16.
II.They clamoured against him as one that was unworthy of life, much more of liberty.
Without weighing the arguments he had urged in his own defence, or offering to make any answer to them, they cried out with a confused noise, "Away with such a fellow as this from the earth, who pretends to have a commission to preach to the Gentiles; why, it is not fit that he should live." Thus the men that have been the greatest blessings of their age have been represented not only as the burdens of the earth, but the plague of their generation. He that was worthy of the greatest honours of life is condemned as not worthy of life itself. See what different sentiments God and men have of good men, and yet they both agree in this that they are not likely to live long in this world. Paul says of the godly Jews that they were men of whom the world was not worthy, Heb 11:38. And therefore they must be removed, that the world may be justly punished with the loss of them. The ungodly Jews here say of Paul that it was not fit he should live; and therefore he must be removed, that the world may be eased of the burden of him, as of the two witnesses, Rev 11:10.
III.They went stark mad against Paul, and against the chief captain for not killing him immediately at their request, or throwing him as a pry into their teeth, that they might devour him (Act 22:23); as men whose reason was quite lost in passion, they cried out like roaring lions or raging bears, and howled like the evening wolves; they cast off their clothes with fury and violence, as much as to say that thus they would tear him if they could but come at him. Or, rather, they thus showed how ready they were to stone him; those that stoned Stephen threw off their clothes, Act 22:20. Or, they rent their clothes, as if he had spoken blasphemy; and threw dust into the air, in detestation of it; or signifying how ready they were to throw stones at Paul, if the chief captain would have permitted them. But why should we go about to give a reason for these experiences of fury, which they themselves could not account for? All they intended was to make the chief captain sensible how much they were enraged and exasperated at Paul, so that he could not do any thing to gratify them more than to let them have their will against him.
IV.The chief captain took care for his safety, by ordering him to be brought into the castle, Act 22:24.
A prison sometimes has been a protection to good men from popular rage. Paul's hour was not yet come, he had not finished his testimony, and therefore God raised up one that took care of him, when none of his friends durst appear on his behalf. Grant not, O Lord, the desire of the wicked.
V.He ordered him the torture, to force from him a confession of some flagrant crimes which had provoked the people to such an uncommon violence against him. He ordered that he should be examined by scourging (as now in some countries by the rack), that he might know wherefore they cried so against him. Herein he did not proceed fairly; he should have singled out some of the clamorous tumultuous complainants, and taken them into the castle as breakers of the peace, and should have examined them, and by scourging too, what they had to lay to the charge of a man that could give so good an account of himself, and did not appear to have done any thing worthy of death or of bonds. It was proper to ask them, but not at all proper to ask Paul, wherefore they cried so against him. He could tell that he had given them no just cause to do it; if there were any cause, let them produce it. No man is bound to accuse himself, though he be guilty, much less ought he to be compelled to accuse himself when he is innocent. Surely the chief captain did not know the Jewish nation when he concluded that he must needs have done something very bad whom they cried out against. Had they not just thus cried out against our Lord Jesus, Crucify him, crucify him, when they had not one word to say in answer to the judge's question, Why, what evil has he done? Is this a fair or just occasion to scourge Paul, that a rude tumultuous mob cry out against him, but cannot tell why or wherefore, and therefore he must be forced to tell?
VI.Paul pleaded his privilege as a Roman citizen, by which he was exempted from all trials and punishments of this nature (Act 22:25):
As they bound him with thongs, or leathern bands, to the whipping post, as they used to bind the vilest of malefactors in bridewell from whom they would extort a confession, he made no outcry against the injustice of their proceedings against an innocent man, but very mildly let them understand the illegality of their proceedings against him as a citizen of Rome, which he had done once before at Philippi after he had been scourged (Act 16:37), but here he makes use of it for prevention. He said to the centurion that stood by, "You know the law; pray is it lawful for you who are yourselves Romans to scourge a man that is a Roman, and uncondemned?" The manner of his speaking plainly intimates what a holy security and serenity of mind this good man enjoyed, not disturbed either with anger or fear in the midst of all those indignities that were done him, and the danger he was in. The Romans had a law (it was called lex Sempronia), that if any magistrate did chastise or condemn a freeman of Rome, indicta causa - without hearing him speak for himself, and deliberating upon the whole of his case, he should be liable to the sentence of the people, who were very jealous of their liberties. It is indeed the privilege of every man not to have wrong done him, except it be proved he has done wrong; as it is of every Englishman by Magna Charta not to be dis-seized of his life or freehold, but by a verdict of twelve men of his peers.
VII.The chief captain was surprised at this, and put into a fright.
He had taken Paul to be a vagabond Egyptian, and wondered he could speak Greek (ch. 21:37), but is much more surprised now he finds that he is as good a gentleman as himself. How many men of great worth and merit are despised because they are not known, are looked upon and treated as the offscouring of all things, when those that count them so, if they knew their true character, would own them to be of the excellent ones of the earth! The chief captain had centurions, under-officers, attending him, ch. 21:32. One of these reports this matter to the chief captain (Act 22:26): Take heed what thou doest, for this man is a Roman, and what indignity is done to him will be construed an offence against the majesty of the Roman people, as they loved to speak. They all knew what a value was put upon this privilege of the Roman citizens. Tully extols it in one of his orations against Verres, O nomen dulce libertatis, O jus eximium nostrae civitatis! O lex Porcia! O leges Semproniae; facinus est vincere Romanum civem, scelus verberare - O Liberty! I love thy charming name; and these our Porcian and Sempronian laws, how admirable! It is a crime to bind a Roman citizen, but an unpardonable one to beat him. "Therefore" (says the centurion) "let us look to ourselves; if this man be a Roman, and we do him any indignity, we shall be in danger to lose our commissions at least." Now,
1.The chief captain would be satisfied of the truth of this from his own mouth (Act 22:27): "Tell me, art thou a Roman? Art thou entitled to the privileges of a Roman citizen?" "Yes," says Paul, "I am;" and perhaps produced some ticket or instrument which proved it; for otherwise they would scarcely have taken his word.
2.The chief captain very freely compares notes with him upon this matter, and it appears that the privilege Paul had as a Roman citizen was of the two more honourable than the colonel's; for the colonel owns that his was purchased: "I am a freeman of Rome; but with a great sum obtained I this freedom, it cost me dear, how came you by it?" "Why truly," says Paul, "I was free-born." Some think he became entitled to this freedom by the place of his birth, as a native of Tarsus, a city privileged by the emperor with the same privileges that Rome itself enjoyed; others rather think it was by his father or grandfather having served in the war between Caesar and Antony, or some other of the civil wars of Rome, and being for some signal piece of service rewarded with a freedom of the city, and so Paul came to be free-born; and here he pleads it for his own preservation, for which end not only we may but we ought to use all lawful means.
3.This put an immediate stop to Paul's trouble. Those that were appointed to examine him by scourging quitted the spot; they departed from him (Act 22:29), lest they should run themselves into a snare. Nay, and the colonel himself, though we may suppose him to have a considerable interest, was afraid when he heard he was a Roman, because, though he had not beaten him, yet he had bound him in order to his being beaten. Thus many are restrained from evil practices by the fear of man who would not be restrained from them by the fear of God. See here the benefit of human laws and magistracy, and what reason we have to be thankful to God for them; for even when they have given no countenance nor special protection to God's people and ministers, yet, by the general support of equity and fair dealing between man and man, they have served to check the rage of wicked and unreasonable illegal men, who otherwise would know no bounds, and to say, Hitherto it shall come, but no further; here shall its proud waves by stayed. And therefore this service we owe to all in authority, to pray for them, because this benefit we have reason to expect from them, whether we have it or no, as long as we are quiet and peaceable - to live quiet and peaceable lives in all godliness and honesty, Ti1 2:1, Ti1 2:2.
4.The governor, the next day, brought Paul before the sanhedrim, Act 22:30. He first loosed him from his bands, that those might not prejudge his cause, and that he might not be charged with having pinioned a Roman citizen, and then summoned the chief priests and all their council to come together to take cognizance of Paul's case, for he found it to be a matter of religion, and therefore looked upon them to be the most proper judges of it. Gallio in this case discharged Paul; finding it to be a matter of their law, he drove the prosecutors from the judgement-seat (Act 18:16), and would not concern himself at all in it; but this Roman, who was a military man, kept Paul in custody, and appealed from the rabble to the general assembly. Now,
(1.)We may hope that hereby he intended Paul's safety, as thinking, if he were an innocent and inoffensive man, though the multitude might be incensed against him, yet the chief priests and elders would do him justice, and clear him; for they were, or should be, men of learning and consideration, and their court governed by rules of equity. When the prophet could find no good among the poorer sort of people, he concluded that it was because they knew not the way of the Lord, nor the judgments of their God, and promised himself that he should speed better among the great men, as the chief captain here did, but soon found himself disappointed there: these have altogether broken the yoke, and burst the bonds, Jer 5:4, Jer 5:5. But,
(2.)That which he is here said to aim at is the gratifying of his own curiosity: He would have known the certainty wherefore he was accused of the Jews. Had he sent for Paul to his own chamber, and talked freely with him, he might soon have learned from him that which would have done more than satisfy his enquiry, and which might have persuaded him to be a Christian. But it is too common for great men to affect to set that at a distance from them which might awaken their consciences, and to desire to have no more of the knowledge of God's ways than may serve them to talk of.
Historical interpretation
Five Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Let it suffice to the martyr to have purged his own sins: it is the part of ingratitude or of pride to lavish upon others also what one has obtained at a high price. Who has redeemed another's death by his own, but the Son of God alone? For even in His very passion He set the robber free.
"When the centurion heard that, he went and told the tribune, saying, Take heed what thou doest: for this man is a Roman. Then the tribune came, and said unto him, Tell me, art thou a Roman? He said, Yea. And the tribune answered, With a great sum obtained I this freedom. And Paul said, But I was free born. Then straightway they departed from him which should have examined him: and the tribune also was afraid, after he knew that he was a Roman, and because he had bound him."
"But I," he says, "was free born." So then his father also was a Roman. What then comes of this? He bound him, and brought him down to the Jews. And the chief captain was afraid, after he learnt that he was a Roman. Why then it was no falsehood.
And Paul said: But I was born so. That is, in this I am more of a Roman than you because I did not buy the Roman name elsewhere, but I was born in their city.
I have obtained this citizenship for a great sum of money. Another edition indicates more clearly what he had said. The tribune said: Do you say so easily that you are a Roman citizen? For I know at what price I obtained this citizenship.
I acquired this city with a great sum of money. In Greek, for city it has πολιτείαν: which signifies rather civil society, that is, social interaction among citizens, or the administration of the republic, than city. For the tribune had not bought the Roman citizenship he possessed, but the partnership of the Roman commonwealth of which he was a participant. But Paul was even more a Roman citizen, because he had this not by purchase, but by birth.
Continue studying Acts 22:28 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Acts 22:28 records a crucial exchange between the Roman chief captain, Claudius Lysias, and the Apostle Paul, revealing the immense value and legal implications of Roman citizenship in the ancient world. This verse highlights the contrasting ways in which each man obtained this coveted status—the captain through a substantial financial payment, and Paul by birth—underscoring God's sovereign hand in providing Paul with a legal safeguard essential for his apostolic ministry and the spread of the Gospel.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is deeply embedded within a dramatic narrative in Jerusalem following Paul's third missionary journey. Having been falsely accused and attacked by a Jewish mob in the Temple courts, Paul was rescued by the Roman tribune, Claudius Lysias. The immediate preceding verses (Acts 22:24-27) describe Lysias's order to scourge Paul to extract a confession, a brutal practice typically reserved for non-Roman criminals. Just as the soldiers were preparing to bind him, Paul calmly invoked his Roman citizenship in Acts 22:25, a declaration that immediately halted the impending torture and shifted the entire legal dynamic. The chief captain's question in Acts 22:28 is a direct response to Paul's assertion, revealing his astonishment and personal investment in such a privilege.
Historical & Cultural Context
Roman citizenship was an exceptionally valuable and highly sought-after status in the Roman Empire, granting significant legal protections and social advantages. Citizens were exempt from scourging without trial, had the right to appeal to Caesar, and were entitled to a fair legal process. There were several ways to acquire citizenship: by birth (if one's parents were citizens), by manumission (for freed slaves), by military service, or by purchase, often for a substantial sum, particularly during the reigns of emperors like Claudius or Nero, who sometimes granted citizenship to individuals or even entire cities for loyalty or financial contributions. The chief captain's statement, "With a great sum obtained I this freedom," reflects the reality of such transactions and the high price commanded by this privilege, indicating his own significant wealth or strategic importance. Paul's birthright citizenship, likely inherited from ancestors in Tarsus (a free city with Roman connections), was a less common but equally valid and powerful form of acquisition.
Key Themes
The exchange in Acts 22:28 contributes to several overarching themes in the book of Acts and Paul's ministry. Firstly, it highlights Divine Providence and Sovereignty, demonstrating how God strategically used Paul's earthly status to protect him and advance the Gospel, ultimately enabling him to reach Rome itself (as seen in his later appeal to Caesar in Acts 25:11). Secondly, it underscores the Value and Power of Roman Citizenship as a legal shield for Christian missionaries operating within the Roman Empire. Thirdly, it subtly introduces a Contrast in Acquisition, setting up a parallel between the chief captain's purchased freedom and Paul's inherited freedom, which can be seen as a foreshadowing of the spiritual truth that salvation and true freedom in Christ are not earned by human effort but are a gift received by spiritual birth into God's family (John 8:36 and Galatians 5:1).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This word literally means "a principal thing" or "main point," but specifically refers to an amount of money, a capital sum. In this context, it emphasizes the significant financial cost the chief captain paid to acquire his Roman citizenship, highlighting its immense value and the effort required for its attainment.
This verb means "to get, i.e., acquire (by any means; own)." It denotes the act of purchasing or coming into possession of something through effort or transaction. The captain "obtained" his freedom, implying a deliberate and costly acquisition, contrasting sharply with Paul's inherited status.
While the KJV inserts "[free]," the underlying Greek word gennáō primarily means "to procreate," "to beget," or "to be born." When used in this context, especially in reference to citizenship, it signifies being born into a particular status, in this case, Roman citizenship. Paul's statement emphasizes that his citizenship was a matter of birthright, not purchase or achievement.
Verse Breakdown
"And the chief captain answered, With a great sum obtained I this freedom."
This clause reveals the chief captain's astonishment and pride in his Roman citizenship. His statement underscores the high value placed on this status, indicating that he paid a substantial amount of money to acquire it. This reflects a common practice in the Roman Empire, where citizenship could be bought, especially by wealthy individuals seeking its numerous legal and social advantages. The captain's words highlight the stark contrast with Paul's subsequent declaration.
"And Paul said, But I was [free] born."
Paul's concise reply reveals a different, and arguably superior, means of acquiring Roman citizenship: by birth. This means he was born into a family that already possessed this status, likely because his parents or ancestors had been granted it, perhaps due to their residence in Tarsus, a city known for its Roman connections and privileges. Paul's birthright citizenship was a providential gift, not an earned or purchased privilege, which would prove invaluable throughout his ministry and legal challenges.
Literary Devices
The passage effectively employs Contrast to highlight the differing origins of Roman citizenship for the chief captain and Paul. The captain's "great sum" stands in stark opposition to Paul's "born" status, emphasizing the unearned nature of Paul's privilege. There is also an element of Irony or Dramatic Irony at play: the powerful Roman military officer had to pay a fortune for a status that his Jewish prisoner possessed by birth, without effort or cost. This unexpected revelation immediately shifts the power dynamic and forces the captain to treat Paul with greater respect and caution. Furthermore, Paul's citizenship serves as a form of Foreshadowing, as this legal protection will repeatedly shield him from harm and enable him to continue his mission, ultimately leading him to Rome, the very heart of the empire, to preach the Gospel.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The exchange in Acts 22:28 profoundly illustrates God's meticulous providence, demonstrating how He orchestrates seemingly secular circumstances to advance His divine purposes. Paul's Roman citizenship, a birthright, was not merely a fortunate coincidence but a strategic provision that repeatedly protected him from unjust treatment, afforded him legal avenues for defense, and ultimately facilitated his journey to Rome to bear witness to Christ before emperors and officials. This earthly citizenship, granted by grace of birth, serves as a powerful analogy for the believer's spiritual citizenship in God's kingdom, which is also a birthright—a new birth by the Spirit, not earned by human effort or "great sums." Just as Paul's physical citizenship granted him privileges and protection, our spiritual citizenship in Christ grants us unparalleled freedom, security, and an eternal inheritance.
Reflection and Application
Acts 22:28 invites us to reflect on the nature of privilege, protection, and divine purpose in our own lives. Paul's Roman citizenship was a gift, not an achievement, yet it was instrumental in his ministry. Similarly, as believers, we possess a far greater, divine birthright: citizenship in the kingdom of God, granted not by earthly lineage or financial sum, but by spiritual rebirth through faith in Jesus Christ. This heavenly citizenship provides us with ultimate security, an eternal inheritance, and the freedom to live boldly for God's purposes, even in the face of adversity. We are called to recognize and leverage the "privileges" God has given us—whether natural talents, unique circumstances, or spiritual gifts—for the advancement of His kingdom, trusting that He sovereignly works all things for good for those who love Him. Our ultimate identity and security are found not in earthly status, but in our belonging to Christ.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What was the significance of Roman citizenship in Paul's time?
Roman citizenship was immensely significant, conferring a wide array of legal protections and social privileges. Citizens were exempt from summary arrest, torture (like scourging) without a formal trial, and capital punishment without a proper judicial process. They also had the right to appeal legal decisions to the emperor, as Paul later did (Acts 25:11). Furthermore, citizenship granted certain social and economic advantages, including the ability to hold public office, own property, and participate in Roman legal and commercial systems. It was a status that commanded respect and provided a powerful legal shield, especially for someone like Paul who frequently faced opposition and legal challenges.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The powerful contrast in Acts 22:28 between the chief captain's costly acquisition of Roman citizenship and Paul's birthright status beautifully foreshadows the nature of our spiritual freedom and citizenship in Christ. Just as Paul inherited his earthly freedom without payment, believers receive their heavenly citizenship and spiritual freedom not by any "great sum" of human effort, good works, or religious merit, but as a divine birthright through the new birth in Jesus Christ. Christ Himself, the ultimate "free-born" Son of God, perfectly fulfilled the Law and offered Himself as the perfect sacrifice, thereby purchasing our redemption and granting us adoption into God's family (Galatians 4:4-7). Through faith in Him, we are born again by the Spirit (John 3:3-8), becoming "fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God" (Ephesians 2:19). Our true freedom is found in the unearned, unmerited grace of Christ, who liberates us from the bondage of sin and death, establishing us as heirs of an eternal inheritance (Romans 8:15-17).