TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Acts 22:22–30. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Paul was going on with this account of himself, had shown them his commission to preach among the Gentiles without any peevish reflections upon the Jews, and we may suppose designed next to show how he was afterwards, by a special direction of the Holy Ghost at Antioch, separated to this service, how tender he was of the Jews, how respectful to them, and how careful to give them the precedency in all places whither he came, and to unite Jews and Gentiles in one body; and then to show how wonderfully God had owned him, and what good service had been done to the interest of God's kingdom among men in general, without damage to any of the true interests of the Jewish church in particular. But, whatever he designs to say, they resolve he shall say no more to them: They gave him audience to this word. Hitherto they had heard him with patience and some attention. But when he speaks of being sent to the Gentiles, though it was what Christ himself said to him, they cannot bear it, not so much as to hear the Gentiles named, such an enmity had they to them, and such a jealousy of them. Upon the mention of this, they have no manner of patience, but forget all rules of decency and equity; thus were they provoked to jealousy by those that were no people, Rom 10:19.
Now here we are told how furious and outrageous the people were against Paul, for mentioning the Gentiles as taken into the cognizance of divine grace, and so justifying his preaching among them.
I.They interrupted him, by lifting up their voice, to put him into confusion, and that nobody might hear a word he said.
Galled consciences kick at the least touch; and those who are resolved not to be rules by reason commonly resolve not to hear it if they can help it. And the spirit of enmity against the gospel of Christ commonly shows itself in silencing the ministers of Christ and his gospel, and stopping their mouths, as the Jews did Paul's here. Their fathers had said to the best of seers, See not, Isa 30:10. And so they to the best of speakers, Speak not. Forbear, wherefore shouldst thou be smitten? Ch2 25:16.
II.They clamoured against him as one that was unworthy of life, much more of liberty.
Without weighing the arguments he had urged in his own defence, or offering to make any answer to them, they cried out with a confused noise, "Away with such a fellow as this from the earth, who pretends to have a commission to preach to the Gentiles; why, it is not fit that he should live." Thus the men that have been the greatest blessings of their age have been represented not only as the burdens of the earth, but the plague of their generation. He that was worthy of the greatest honours of life is condemned as not worthy of life itself. See what different sentiments God and men have of good men, and yet they both agree in this that they are not likely to live long in this world. Paul says of the godly Jews that they were men of whom the world was not worthy, Heb 11:38. And therefore they must be removed, that the world may be justly punished with the loss of them. The ungodly Jews here say of Paul that it was not fit he should live; and therefore he must be removed, that the world may be eased of the burden of him, as of the two witnesses, Rev 11:10.
III.They went stark mad against Paul, and against the chief captain for not killing him immediately at their request, or throwing him as a pry into their teeth, that they might devour him (Act 22:23); as men whose reason was quite lost in passion, they cried out like roaring lions or raging bears, and howled like the evening wolves; they cast off their clothes with fury and violence, as much as to say that thus they would tear him if they could but come at him. Or, rather, they thus showed how ready they were to stone him; those that stoned Stephen threw off their clothes, Act 22:20. Or, they rent their clothes, as if he had spoken blasphemy; and threw dust into the air, in detestation of it; or signifying how ready they were to throw stones at Paul, if the chief captain would have permitted them. But why should we go about to give a reason for these experiences of fury, which they themselves could not account for? All they intended was to make the chief captain sensible how much they were enraged and exasperated at Paul, so that he could not do any thing to gratify them more than to let them have their will against him.
IV.The chief captain took care for his safety, by ordering him to be brought into the castle, Act 22:24.
A prison sometimes has been a protection to good men from popular rage. Paul's hour was not yet come, he had not finished his testimony, and therefore God raised up one that took care of him, when none of his friends durst appear on his behalf. Grant not, O Lord, the desire of the wicked.
V.He ordered him the torture, to force from him a confession of some flagrant crimes which had provoked the people to such an uncommon violence against him. He ordered that he should be examined by scourging (as now in some countries by the rack), that he might know wherefore they cried so against him. Herein he did not proceed fairly; he should have singled out some of the clamorous tumultuous complainants, and taken them into the castle as breakers of the peace, and should have examined them, and by scourging too, what they had to lay to the charge of a man that could give so good an account of himself, and did not appear to have done any thing worthy of death or of bonds. It was proper to ask them, but not at all proper to ask Paul, wherefore they cried so against him. He could tell that he had given them no just cause to do it; if there were any cause, let them produce it. No man is bound to accuse himself, though he be guilty, much less ought he to be compelled to accuse himself when he is innocent. Surely the chief captain did not know the Jewish nation when he concluded that he must needs have done something very bad whom they cried out against. Had they not just thus cried out against our Lord Jesus, Crucify him, crucify him, when they had not one word to say in answer to the judge's question, Why, what evil has he done? Is this a fair or just occasion to scourge Paul, that a rude tumultuous mob cry out against him, but cannot tell why or wherefore, and therefore he must be forced to tell?
VI.Paul pleaded his privilege as a Roman citizen, by which he was exempted from all trials and punishments of this nature (Act 22:25):
As they bound him with thongs, or leathern bands, to the whipping post, as they used to bind the vilest of malefactors in bridewell from whom they would extort a confession, he made no outcry against the injustice of their proceedings against an innocent man, but very mildly let them understand the illegality of their proceedings against him as a citizen of Rome, which he had done once before at Philippi after he had been scourged (Act 16:37), but here he makes use of it for prevention. He said to the centurion that stood by, "You know the law; pray is it lawful for you who are yourselves Romans to scourge a man that is a Roman, and uncondemned?" The manner of his speaking plainly intimates what a holy security and serenity of mind this good man enjoyed, not disturbed either with anger or fear in the midst of all those indignities that were done him, and the danger he was in. The Romans had a law (it was called lex Sempronia), that if any magistrate did chastise or condemn a freeman of Rome, indicta causa - without hearing him speak for himself, and deliberating upon the whole of his case, he should be liable to the sentence of the people, who were very jealous of their liberties. It is indeed the privilege of every man not to have wrong done him, except it be proved he has done wrong; as it is of every Englishman by Magna Charta not to be dis-seized of his life or freehold, but by a verdict of twelve men of his peers.
VII.The chief captain was surprised at this, and put into a fright.
He had taken Paul to be a vagabond Egyptian, and wondered he could speak Greek (ch. 21:37), but is much more surprised now he finds that he is as good a gentleman as himself. How many men of great worth and merit are despised because they are not known, are looked upon and treated as the offscouring of all things, when those that count them so, if they knew their true character, would own them to be of the excellent ones of the earth! The chief captain had centurions, under-officers, attending him, ch. 21:32. One of these reports this matter to the chief captain (Act 22:26): Take heed what thou doest, for this man is a Roman, and what indignity is done to him will be construed an offence against the majesty of the Roman people, as they loved to speak. They all knew what a value was put upon this privilege of the Roman citizens. Tully extols it in one of his orations against Verres, O nomen dulce libertatis, O jus eximium nostrae civitatis! O lex Porcia! O leges Semproniae; facinus est vincere Romanum civem, scelus verberare - O Liberty! I love thy charming name; and these our Porcian and Sempronian laws, how admirable! It is a crime to bind a Roman citizen, but an unpardonable one to beat him. "Therefore" (says the centurion) "let us look to ourselves; if this man be a Roman, and we do him any indignity, we shall be in danger to lose our commissions at least." Now,
1.The chief captain would be satisfied of the truth of this from his own mouth (Act 22:27): "Tell me, art thou a Roman? Art thou entitled to the privileges of a Roman citizen?" "Yes," says Paul, "I am;" and perhaps produced some ticket or instrument which proved it; for otherwise they would scarcely have taken his word.
2.The chief captain very freely compares notes with him upon this matter, and it appears that the privilege Paul had as a Roman citizen was of the two more honourable than the colonel's; for the colonel owns that his was purchased: "I am a freeman of Rome; but with a great sum obtained I this freedom, it cost me dear, how came you by it?" "Why truly," says Paul, "I was free-born." Some think he became entitled to this freedom by the place of his birth, as a native of Tarsus, a city privileged by the emperor with the same privileges that Rome itself enjoyed; others rather think it was by his father or grandfather having served in the war between Caesar and Antony, or some other of the civil wars of Rome, and being for some signal piece of service rewarded with a freedom of the city, and so Paul came to be free-born; and here he pleads it for his own preservation, for which end not only we may but we ought to use all lawful means.
3.This put an immediate stop to Paul's trouble. Those that were appointed to examine him by scourging quitted the spot; they departed from him (Act 22:29), lest they should run themselves into a snare. Nay, and the colonel himself, though we may suppose him to have a considerable interest, was afraid when he heard he was a Roman, because, though he had not beaten him, yet he had bound him in order to his being beaten. Thus many are restrained from evil practices by the fear of man who would not be restrained from them by the fear of God. See here the benefit of human laws and magistracy, and what reason we have to be thankful to God for them; for even when they have given no countenance nor special protection to God's people and ministers, yet, by the general support of equity and fair dealing between man and man, they have served to check the rage of wicked and unreasonable illegal men, who otherwise would know no bounds, and to say, Hitherto it shall come, but no further; here shall its proud waves by stayed. And therefore this service we owe to all in authority, to pray for them, because this benefit we have reason to expect from them, whether we have it or no, as long as we are quiet and peaceable - to live quiet and peaceable lives in all godliness and honesty, Ti1 2:1, Ti1 2:2.
4.The governor, the next day, brought Paul before the sanhedrim, Act 22:30. He first loosed him from his bands, that those might not prejudge his cause, and that he might not be charged with having pinioned a Roman citizen, and then summoned the chief priests and all their council to come together to take cognizance of Paul's case, for he found it to be a matter of religion, and therefore looked upon them to be the most proper judges of it. Gallio in this case discharged Paul; finding it to be a matter of their law, he drove the prosecutors from the judgement-seat (Act 18:16), and would not concern himself at all in it; but this Roman, who was a military man, kept Paul in custody, and appealed from the rabble to the general assembly. Now,
(1.)We may hope that hereby he intended Paul's safety, as thinking, if he were an innocent and inoffensive man, though the multitude might be incensed against him, yet the chief priests and elders would do him justice, and clear him; for they were, or should be, men of learning and consideration, and their court governed by rules of equity. When the prophet could find no good among the poorer sort of people, he concluded that it was because they knew not the way of the Lord, nor the judgments of their God, and promised himself that he should speed better among the great men, as the chief captain here did, but soon found himself disappointed there: these have altogether broken the yoke, and burst the bonds, Jer 5:4, Jer 5:5. But,
(2.)That which he is here said to aim at is the gratifying of his own curiosity: He would have known the certainty wherefore he was accused of the Jews. Had he sent for Paul to his own chamber, and talked freely with him, he might soon have learned from him that which would have done more than satisfy his enquiry, and which might have persuaded him to be a Christian. But it is too common for great men to affect to set that at a distance from them which might awaken their consciences, and to desire to have no more of the knowledge of God's ways than may serve them to talk of.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
"When the centurion heard that, he went and told the tribune, saying, Take heed what thou doest: for this man is a Roman. Then the tribune came, and said unto him, Tell me, art thou a Roman? He said, Yea. And the tribune answered, With a great sum obtained I this freedom. And Paul said, But I was free born. Then straightway they departed from him which should have examined him: and the tribune also was afraid, after he knew that he was a Roman, and because he had bound him."
"But I," he says, "was free born." So then his father also was a Roman. What then comes of this? He bound him, and brought him down to the Jews. And the chief captain was afraid, after he learnt that he was a Roman. Why then it was no falsehood.
Continue studying Acts 22:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Acts 22:27 records the pivotal moment when the Roman chief captain, Claudius Lysias, directly confronts the Apostle Paul regarding his claim of Roman citizenship. Having just rescued Paul from a violent mob in Jerusalem and intending to scourge him for answers, the chief captain's urgent inquiry, "Tell me, art thou a Roman?", is met with Paul's simple, yet profoundly impactful, affirmation, "Yea." This brief exchange immediately halts the brutal interrogation, underscoring the immense legal protections afforded by Roman citizenship and dramatically altering Paul's precarious situation, setting the stage for his subsequent appeals and missionary journey to Rome.
Context
Literary Context
Acts 22:27 is situated within a dramatic sequence of events following Paul's return to Jerusalem. He had been falsely accused by zealous Jews, leading to a violent uproar in the temple courts where he was nearly lynched (Acts 21:27-32). The Roman chief captain, Claudius Lysias, intervened to save Paul, initially believing him to be an Egyptian terrorist (Acts 21:38). After Paul requested and was granted permission to speak, he addressed the Jewish crowd from the temple steps, recounting his Jewish heritage, his persecution of Christians, his Damascus Road conversion, and his divine commission to preach to the Gentiles (Acts 22:1-21). The mention of his mission to the Gentiles ignited a fresh wave of fury, prompting the crowd to demand his death (Acts 22:22-23). To ascertain the reason for such intense hatred, Lysias ordered Paul to be brought into the barracks and scourged (Acts 22:24). It is at this critical juncture, as Paul is being bound for scourging, that he asserts his Roman citizenship to a centurion (Acts 22:25), leading directly to the chief captain's urgent inquiry in verse 27.
Historical & Cultural Context
Roman citizenship was a highly prized and protected status within the Roman Empire, offering significant legal privileges and immunities. Citizens were generally exempt from scourging (flogging) without a trial, and they possessed the right to appeal to Caesar in cases of capital punishment or severe injustice. The act of scourging a Roman citizen without a proper legal process was a grave offense, punishable by severe penalties for the Roman official who ordered it. Roman law, particularly the Lex Porcia and Lex Sempronia, explicitly forbade such treatment. The chief captain's immediate concern and direct questioning upon hearing of Paul's claim highlight the serious legal ramifications for him if he had indeed violated the rights of a Roman citizen. Roman citizenship could be acquired by birth (if one's parents were citizens), by military service, by manumission (release from slavery), or by purchase, as the chief captain himself admits to having done (Acts 22:28). Paul's claim, therefore, was not a minor detail but a declaration that instantly shifted the legal landscape of his arrest.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully illustrates several key themes. Firstly, it underscores the immense privilege and legal protection afforded by Roman citizenship, which served as a vital shield for Paul against arbitrary violence and injustice. This status guaranteed him due process under Roman law, preventing immediate scourging and setting the stage for his subsequent appeals and defenses. Secondly, it highlights divine providence in Paul's life and ministry. Paul's Roman citizenship was not a mere accident of birth but a strategic provision by God, repeatedly used to protect him and facilitate his mission to spread the gospel, ultimately leading him to Rome itself as prophesied (Acts 23:11). Finally, the passage exemplifies Paul's strategic use of his rights for the advancement of the gospel. Paul was not a passive victim; he judiciously employed his civil rights when it served God's purposes, demonstrating wisdom and discernment in navigating hostile environments while remaining committed to his divine calling. His assertion of citizenship here was not for personal comfort alone but to preserve his ability to continue proclaiming the message of Christ.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From chílioi (a thousand) and árchō (to rule), this term literally means "commander of a thousand soldiers" or "colonel." In the Roman military structure, a chiliarch was a high-ranking officer responsible for a cohort, typically comprising around 600 men. This indicates Claudius Lysias's significant authority and responsibility in Jerusalem, making his immediate concern about Paul's citizenship understandable given the severe penalties for violating a Roman citizen's rights.
This term refers to a citizen of Rome or the Roman Empire. Roman citizenship was a highly valued legal status that conferred specific rights and protections, including immunity from certain forms of punishment (like scourging without trial) and the right to appeal legal decisions to the emperor. Paul's simple declaration that he was a Rhōmaîos instantly changed the entire legal dynamic of his situation.
A primary particle of strong affirmation, meaning "yes," "surely," "truth," or "verily." Paul's use of this single word is a concise, unequivocal, and powerful declaration. It is not an equivocation or a hesitant admission, but a firm and direct confirmation of his Roman status, leaving no room for doubt and immediately compelling the chief captain to cease the intended scourging.
Verse Breakdown
"Then the chief captain came,"
This phrase indicates the immediate and urgent response of Claudius Lysias upon being informed by the centurion of Paul's claim of Roman citizenship. His personal presence underscores the gravity of the situation and his direct involvement in verifying such a critical legal assertion.
"and said unto him,"
This highlights the directness of the chief captain's inquiry. He doesn't send a subordinate but confronts Paul himself, reflecting the high stakes involved for a Roman official who might inadvertently violate a citizen's rights.
"Tell me, art thou a Roman?"
This is the core question, revealing the chief captain's disbelief, urgency, and perhaps a touch of apprehension. The question is posed as a direct challenge, demanding a clear answer that would determine Paul's immediate fate and the chief captain's future actions. The implied "if" (from G1487 ei) in the Greek structure emphasizes the conditional nature of the inquiry: "If you are a Roman, tell me."
"He said, Yea."
Paul's one-word response is a concise and definitive affirmation. It is a powerful declaration of fact that immediately validates his earlier claim and brings the intended scourging to an abrupt halt. This simple "Yea" carries immense legal weight and authority, demonstrating Paul's composure and understanding of Roman law.
Literary Devices
The passage employs several effective literary devices. Dialogue is central, with the terse exchange between the chief captain and Paul driving the narrative forward and highlighting the immediate shift in power dynamics. The chief captain's urgent question, "Tell me, art thou a Roman?", followed by Paul's simple, declarative Affirmation, "Yea," creates a moment of high Dramatic Irony. The Roman official, intending to brutalize Paul for information, is suddenly put on the defensive by the very man he sought to punish, revealing Paul's unexpected legal leverage. There is also an element of Suspense, as the reader, like the chief captain, awaits Paul's answer, knowing the profound implications it holds for his safety and future. Furthermore, the scene serves as Foreshadowing, as Paul's Roman citizenship will continue to play a crucial role in his subsequent trials, appeals, and ultimate journey to Rome, fulfilling God's plan for him to bear witness before kings.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Acts 22:27 profoundly illustrates God's sovereign hand at work, even through secular systems and human laws, to advance His divine purposes. Paul's Roman citizenship was not a mere coincidence but a providential provision, strategically employed by God to protect His chosen instrument and ensure the spread of the gospel to the Gentile world, ultimately to Rome itself. This passage reminds us that God's plan is comprehensive, utilizing every aspect of a believer's life—their background, nationality, and even their civil rights—to achieve His kingdom objectives. It also teaches us the wisdom of discerning when to endure suffering for Christ and when to judiciously assert our legal or civil rights, not for selfish gain, but for the greater good of the gospel and the protection of our ability to serve God.
Reflection and Application
Acts 22:27 serves as a powerful reminder for believers today that God is sovereign over all circumstances, even those that seem chaotic or threatening. Just as Paul's Roman citizenship was a divinely ordained tool for his protection and the advancement of the gospel, so too does God equip and position us within our own societies and legal frameworks for His purposes. We are called to live wisely, discerning when to humbly submit to authority and when to righteously assert our God-given rights, always with the ultimate goal of honoring Christ and furthering His kingdom. This passage encourages us to trust in God's perfect timing and provision, even when facing opposition or injustice, knowing that He can turn seemingly dire situations into opportunities for His glory. It also challenges us to be courageous and clear in our identity as followers of Christ, ready to affirm the truth of our faith and our standing in Him, even when it means standing against the tide.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Paul's Roman citizenship so significant in this situation?
Paul's Roman citizenship was profoundly significant because it granted him specific legal protections under Roman law that were denied to non-citizens. Chief among these was immunity from scourging (flogging) without a proper trial, and the right to appeal to Caesar. The chief captain's intention was to scourge Paul to extract information about the uproar, a practice strictly forbidden for Roman citizens. Paul's simple declaration of his citizenship immediately halted this unlawful procedure, saving him from a brutal beating and forcing the Roman authorities to treat him with due process, which ultimately led to his journey to Rome as a prisoner, fulfilling God's plan for him to preach the gospel there (Acts 23:11).
What does Paul's response "Yea" reveal about his character?
Paul's concise "Yea" (Greek: naí) reveals several aspects of his character. Firstly, it demonstrates his remarkable composure and courage under duress. Despite being bound for scourging, he remains calm and clear-headed. Secondly, it shows his strategic wisdom and discernment. He doesn't passively endure injustice but judiciously uses his legal rights when it serves a greater purpose. Thirdly, it highlights his firmness and honesty. There is no equivocation or hesitation; he states the truth directly and unequivocally. This moment showcases Paul as a man who understands both divine providence and human law, using both for the advancement of the gospel.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Acts 22:27 details Paul's strategic use of his Roman citizenship for protection and gospel advancement, it ultimately points to Christ, who, though possessing all divine rights and authority, willingly laid them aside for the sake of humanity's salvation. Jesus, the King of Kings, did not assert His divine prerogative when unjustly accused and condemned; instead, He submitted to the ultimate scourging and crucifixion, becoming the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). His silence before His accusers (Matthew 27:12-14) and His willingness to suffer unjustly (1 Peter 2:21-24) stand in stark contrast to Paul's assertion of rights, yet both serve God's redemptive plan. Paul's protection through human law allowed him to continue proclaiming the gospel, a mission made possible only by Christ's ultimate sacrifice, which transcended all human laws and systems. Thus, Paul's experience, while demonstrating God's providential care for His servants, ultimately magnifies the greater work of Christ, who, by surrendering His rights, secured eternal freedom and citizenship in the Kingdom of God for all who believe (Philippians 3:20).