דלג לתוכן

1 Chronicles 7:14

“The Families of Manasseh”· 1 Chronicles 7:14–19Read in context
King James Version
The sons of Manasseh; Ashriel, whom she bare: (but his concubine the Aramitess bare Machir the father of Gilead:
KJV (with Strong's)
The sons H1121 of Manasseh H4519; Ashriel H844, whom she bare H3205:( but his concubine H6370 the Aramitess H761 bare H3205 Machir H4353 the father H1 of Gilead H1568:
Complete Jewish Bible
The descendants of M'nasheh: his concubine the woman from Aram bore Makhir the father of Gil'ad; Asri'el [Gil'ad's son] was descended from her.
Berean Standard Bible
The descendants of Manasseh: Through his Aramean concubine, Asriel, as well as Machir the father of Gilead.
American Standard Version
The sons of Manasseh: Asriel, whom his concubine the Aramitess bare; she bare Machir the father of Gilead.
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Manasseh: Asriel, whom his concubine the Aramitess bore: she bore Machir the father of Gilead:
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonne of Manasseh was Ashriel whom she bare vnto him, but his concubine of Aram bare Machir the father of Gilead.
Young's Literal Translation
Sons of Manasseh: Ashriel, whom Jaladah his Aramaean concubine bare, with Machir father of Gilead.
עברית · Modern
בני מנשה אשריאל אשר ילדה פילגשו הארמיה ילדה את מכיר אבי גלעד׃
Translation

Study this verse

Summary

1 Chronicles 7:14 serves as a precise, albeit brief, entry within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Manasseh, one of Joseph's sons. This verse meticulously identifies two of Manasseh's descendants: Ashriel, born to his unnamed primary wife, and Machir, born to his concubine, an Aramitess. The explicit mention of Machir's mother's foreign origin and his significant designation as "the father of Gilead" not only illuminates the complex social dynamics of ancient Israelite lineage but also underscores the historical prominence and territorial influence of Machir's descendants in settling the Transjordanian region.

Context

Literary Context

1 Chronicles 7:14 is embedded within the foundational genealogical sections that span the first nine chapters of 1 Chronicles. These meticulous records are not mere lists; they form the bedrock of the Chronicler's theological narrative, meticulously tracing the lineage of God's covenant people from Adam through the patriarchs and the twelve tribes of Israel. Chapter 7 specifically delineates the descendants of Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. The detailed account of Manasseh's lineage, particularly in 1 Chronicles 7:14-19, highlights the tribe's considerable size and influence, especially its unique settlement on both sides of the Jordan River. This comprehensive cataloging was critically important for the post-exilic community, providing a vital framework for re-establishing tribal identities, land claims, and priestly roles, thereby fostering a profound sense of continuity with their ancestral heritage after their return to Judah. The inclusion of figures like Machir, who was foundational to the settlement of Gilead, clearly demonstrates the Chronicler's deep interest in the historical and geographical realities that shaped the tribes.

Historical & Cultural Context

The historical setting for the book of 1 Chronicles is the post-exilic period, most likely dating to the late 5th or early 4th century BCE, a time when the returned exiles were intensely focused on reconstructing their society and reaffirming their identity. In this era, genealogies transcended simple lists; they functioned as crucial legal and social documents, serving to determine inheritance rights, confirm tribal affiliations, and establish eligibility for various societal and religious roles, particularly within the Levitical priesthood. The reference to a "concubine the Aramitess" in 1 Chronicles 7:14 reflects the widespread practice of polygamy in ancient Near Eastern societies and the occasional, albeit often complex, interactions and intermarriages between Israelites and people from neighboring regions. While later Mosaic Law would explicitly discourage or prohibit such unions (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3), the Chronicler acknowledges this historical reality without judgment. Aram (Syria) was a significant neighboring kingdom, and cultural exchanges were frequent. The designation "father of Gilead" for Machir is a cultural idiom, signifying that he was not merely an ancestor but the foundational progenitor or leading figure from whom the inhabitants of the strategic region of Gilead descended. This highlights the profound importance of territorial identity being intrinsically linked to lineage in ancient Israel, as evidenced by Machir's role in the conquest of Gilead in Numbers 32:39.

Key Themes

This concise verse, despite its brevity, significantly contributes to several overarching themes prevalent in 1 Chronicles and the broader biblical narrative. Foremost among these is Genealogical Preservation, which profoundly emphasizes God's meticulous care for His covenant people and the unbroken continuity of their lineage. These detailed records were indispensable for the returning exiles, serving to validate their tribal identities and land rights, thus firmly grounding their present existence in their divinely ordained past. Another crucial theme is the Inclusion of Diverse Lineage. The explicit mention of an "Aramitess" concubine in Manasseh's line reveals that the Israelite family, while divinely set apart, occasionally incorporated individuals from various ethnic backgrounds. This nuanced portrayal of identity demonstrates a broader understanding of God's work that was not always purely exclusive, subtly foreshadowing a grander redemptive plan that would ultimately embrace all nations. Finally, the verse underscores Machir's Prominence and Territorial Significance. By identifying Machir as "the father of Gilead," the text highlights that certain individuals were pivotal, foundational figures whose descendants played instrumental roles in the settlement, development, and defense of specific regions. Machir's critical role as "the father of Gilead" emphatically underscores the importance of land inheritance and tribal expansion as integral aspects of God's enduring promises to Abraham, a theme further elaborated in Joshua 17:1.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Ashriel ʼAsrîyʼêl' H844

This name, meaning "God is my uprightness" or "God is my prince," refers to one of Manasseh's sons. While Ashriel is mentioned first, implying his birth to Manasseh's primary wife (in contrast to the concubine), the text provides no further details about his life or descendants beyond this initial mention. His inclusion primarily serves to complete the genealogical record, establishing the legitimate line alongside the one born of a concubine, ensuring a comprehensive account of Manasseh's progeny.

Aramitess ʼĂrammîy' H761

This term specifically denotes a woman originating from Aram, or Syria, highlighting her foreign ethnicity. Coupled with her status as a "concubine" (Hebrew, pîylegesh, meaning a secondary wife or paramour), this detail is highly significant. It explicitly acknowledges the reality of intermingling between Israelites and neighboring peoples, even if such unions were subject to later legal and social regulations. Her status as a concubine indicates a secondary marital arrangement, where children were considered legitimate but might have had distinct inheritance rights or social standing compared to those born of a primary wife.

Machir Mâkîyr' H4353

Derived from a root meaning "salesman" or "purchased," Machir emerges as the most prominent figure in this verse. His designation as "the father of Gilead" elevates his status beyond a mere name in a list, signifying his foundational and preeminent role as the progenitor of the inhabitants of the Transjordanian region of Gilead. His descendants were instrumental in conquering and settling this territory, which became a significant and strategic part of Manasseh's tribal inheritance.

Verse Breakdown

"The sons of Manasseh; Ashriel, whom she bare:"

This opening clause introduces the lineage of Manasseh, immediately focusing on Ashriel. The phrase "whom she bare" implicitly refers to Manasseh's primary, unnamed wife, establishing Ashriel as a son born of a legitimate and primary marital union. This initial statement subtly sets up a contrast with the subsequent clause, preparing the reader for a different maternal lineage.

"([but] his concubine the Aramitess bare Machir"

The KJV's parenthetical "but" (implied in the Hebrew by the juxtaposition) immediately introduces a distinct maternal lineage for Machir. The explicit identification of the mother as "his concubine the Aramitess" is a crucial detail. It highlights Machir's birth from a secondary wife of foreign origin, a noteworthy fact in a genealogical record that often emphasized purity of lineage, yet it acknowledges this reality without explicit condemnation, reflecting the complexities of ancient Israelite family life.

"the father of Gilead:"

This concluding phrase functions as an honorific and descriptive title for Machir, underscoring his immense historical and territorial significance. To be called "the father of Gilead" means he was not just an ancestor but the foundational figure from whom the inhabitants of the strategically important Transjordanian region of Gilead descended, or he was the founder of a dominant clan that played a pivotal role in settling and controlling that area. This designation elevates Machir beyond a simple name, marking him as a pivotal figure in the tribal history of Manasseh and the broader narrative of Israel's territorial expansion.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 7:14 is Genealogical Listing, a quintessential feature of the Chronicler's work. This meticulous cataloging serves the theological purpose of establishing historical continuity, reaffirming tribal identity, and demonstrating the faithfulness of God's promises regarding the multiplication of Abraham's descendants. The verse also subtly utilizes Juxtaposition or Implied Contrast, particularly evident in the KJV's parenthetical "but," which distinguishes between the son born of the primary wife (Ashriel) and the son born of the concubine (Machir). This highlights the complexities and varied structures of ancient Israelite family units. Furthermore, the phrase "the father of Gilead" functions as a significant Appellation or Epithet, providing crucial descriptive information about Machir that elevates his importance beyond a mere name, signifying his foundational and preeminent role in the settlement of a specific and vital region.

Theological and Thematic Connections

1 Chronicles 7:14, though a seemingly dry genealogical entry, offers profound theological insights into God's sovereign hand in human history and His intricate, often surprising, plan for His people. It powerfully underscores that God's covenant purposes are meticulously carried out through real, often complex, human families and circumstances. The inclusion of a concubine and an "Aramitess" mother for Machir serves as a poignant reminder that God's redemptive narrative is not confined to perfect or idealized lineages but robustly incorporates diverse backgrounds, even those that might seem unconventional or outside the strictures of later Mosaic law. This demonstrates God's remarkable ability to work through all facets of human life, including its imperfections and unexpected turns, to achieve His grand purposes, building a chosen people for Himself. The meticulous record-keeping itself stands as a testament to God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His chosen lineage, a lineage that ultimately and providentially points to the coming Messiah.

Reflection and Application

While genealogies might initially appear as distant and perhaps unengaging historical records, 1 Chronicles 7:14 offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is intimately involved in the minute details of human life and lineage, meticulously preserving the unfolding story of His people across generations. Just as Machir's lineage was crucial for understanding the tribal landscape and land claims of ancient Israel, our own personal stories and spiritual heritage are integral threads woven into a larger, divine narrative. This verse profoundly encourages us to recognize that God works through diverse individuals and often unexpected circumstances—even those that might seem unconventional or imperfect by human standards—to fulfill His grand, overarching purposes. It powerfully reinforces the liberating truth that every individual, regardless of their background, origin, or perceived imperfections, has a unique and valued place within God's unfolding plan, and that our deepest identity is ultimately rooted not merely in our earthly lineage but in our profound and eternal connection to the family of God through Christ.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the meticulous preservation of genealogies in Scripture, as seen in 1 Chronicles, affirm God's faithfulness and His detailed knowledge of each individual's life and story?
  2. What does the inclusion of a "concubine the Aramitess" in the lineage of Manasseh teach us about God's willingness to work through diverse, and sometimes unexpected, human circumstances to accomplish His will?
  3. In what specific ways does understanding our spiritual heritage and our place within God's larger redemptive narrative provide comfort, purpose, and direction in our own lives today?

FAQ

Why is the mother of Machir, the "Aramitess," specifically mentioned in this genealogical record?

The explicit mention of Machir's mother as "the Aramitess" is highly significant for several reasons. Firstly, it highlights the historical reality of intermarriage or relationships between Israelites and people from neighboring regions, such as Aram (Syria), even though such unions would later be discouraged or even prohibited by Mosaic Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3). Secondly, her status as a "concubine" (a secondary wife) distinguishes Machir's lineage from that of Ashriel, who was presumably born to Manasseh's primary wife. This detail provides crucial clarity regarding the family structure and potential inheritance distinctions within the tribe of Manasseh. The Chronicler's inclusion of this specific detail underscores the comprehensive and honest nature of the genealogical record, acknowledging the full, and sometimes complex, tapestry of Israelite ancestry. Furthermore, it subtly foreshadows the broader biblical theme of God's redemptive plan extending beyond purely Israelite lines, eventually encompassing all nations, a theme that finds its ultimate fulfillment in Christ.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The seemingly dry genealogical entry of 1 Chronicles 7:14, like all Old Testament genealogies, finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While these meticulous lists served to establish tribal identity, land claims, and historical continuity for ancient Israel, their deepest purpose was to point forward to the one who is the culmination of all God's promises and the true "father" of a new, spiritual people. The mention of a concubine and an "Aramitess" mother for Machir subtly prefigures the radical inclusivity of Christ's own genealogy, which notably includes Gentiles like Rahab (Matthew 1:5) and Ruth (Matthew 1:5), powerfully demonstrating that God's redemptive plan transcends ethnic, social, and even conventional religious boundaries. Just as Machir was "the father of Gilead," a progenitor of a specific territory, Jesus is the "Father of an eternal generation" (Isaiah 9:6), the divine progenitor and head of the Church, His spiritual family, gathered from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation (Revelation 7:9). The meticulous preservation of lineage in Chronicles underscores God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant, culminating in the perfect Son of David, through whom all the promises of land, blessing, and eternal inheritance are realized, not in a geographical territory, but in the boundless, spiritual kingdom of God (John 18:36).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Chronicles 7:1–19. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 19 verses
Passage under comment1 Chronicles 7:1–19
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here a short view given us,

I.Of the tribe of Issachar, whom Jacob had compared to a strong ass, couching between two burdens (Gen 49:14), an industrious tribe, that minded their country business very closely and rejoiced in their tents, Deu 33:18. And here it appears,

1.That they were a numerous tribe; for they had many wives. So fruitful their country was that they saw no danger of over-stocking the pasture, and so ingenious the people were that they could find work for all hands. Let no people complain of their numbers, provided they suffer none to be idle.

2.That they were a valiant tribe, men of might (Ch1 7:2, Ch1 7:5), chief men, Ch1 7:3. Those that were inured to labour and business were of all men the fittest to serve their country when there was occasion, The number of the respective families, as taken in the days of David, is here set down, amounting in the whole to above 145,000 men fit for war. The account, some think, was taken when Joab numbered the people, 2 Sa. 24. But I rather think it refers to some other computation that was made, perhaps among themselves, because it is said (Ch1 27:24) that that account was not inserted in the chronicles of king David, it having offended God.

II.Of the tribe of Benjamin.

Some account is here given of this tribe, but much larger in the next chapter. The militia of this tribe scarcely reached to 60,000; but they are said to be mighty men of valour, Ch1 7:7, Ch1 7:9, Ch1 7:11. Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf, Gen 49:27. It was the honour of this tribe that it produced Saul the first king, and more its honour that it adhered to the rightful kings of the house of David when the other tribes revolted. Here is mention (Ch1 7:12) of Hushim the sons of Aher. The sons of Dan are said to be Hushim (Gen 46:23), and therefore some read Aher appellatively, Hushim - the sons of another (that is, another of Jacob's sons) or the sons of a stranger, which Israelites should not be, but such the Danites were when they set up Micah's graven and molten image among them.

III.Of the tribe of Naphtali, Ch1 7:13.

The first fathers only of that tribe are named, the very same that we shall find, Gen 46:24, only that Shillem there is Shallum here. None of their descendents are named, perhaps because their genealogies were lost.

IV.Of the tribe of Manasseh, that part of it which was seated within Jordan; for of the other part we had some account before, Ch1 5:23, etc. Of this tribe observe,

1.That one of them married an Aramitess, that is, a Syrian, Ch1 7:14. This was during their bondage in Egypt, so early did they begin to mingle with the nations.

2.That, though the father married a Syrian, Machir, the son of that marriage, perhaps seeing the inconvenience of it in his father's house, took to wife a daughter of Benjamin, Ch1 7:15. It is good for the children to take warning by their father's mistakes and not stumble at the same stone.

3.Here is mention of Bedan (Ch1 7:17), who perhaps is the same with that Bedan who is mentioned as one of Israel's deliverers, Sa1 12:11. Jair perhaps, who was of Manasseh (Jdg 10:3), was the man.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 458
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceQUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceQUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceQUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8