- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Numbers 26:5–51.
This is the register of the tribes as they were now enrolled, in the same order that they were numbered in ch. 1. Observe,
I.The account that is here kept of the families of each tribe, which must not be understood of such as we call families, those that live in a house together, but such as were the descendants of the several sons of the patriarchs, by whose names, in honour of them, their posterity distinguished themselves and one another. The families of the twelve tribes are thus numbered: - Of Dan but one, for Dan had but one son, and yet that tribe was the most numerous of all except Judah, Num 26:42, Num 26:43. Its beginning was small, but its latter end greatly increased. Zebulun was divided into three families, Ephraim into four, Issachar into four, Naphtali into four, and Reuben into four; Judah, Simeon, and Asher, had five families apiece, Gad and Benjamin seven apiece, and Manasseh eight. Benjamin brought ten sons into Egypt (Gen 46:21), but three of them, it seems either died childless or their families were extinct, for here we find seven only of those names preserved, and that whole tribe none of the most numerous; for Providence, in the building up of families and nations, does not tie itself to probabilities. The barren hath borne seven, and she that hath many children has waxed feeble, Sa1 2:5.
II.The numbers of each tribe.
And here our best entertainment will be to compare these numbers with those when they were numbered at Mount Sinai. The sum total was nearly the same; they were now 1820 fewer than they were then; yet seven of the tribes had increased in number. Judah had increased 1900, Issachar 9900, Zebulun 3100, Manasseh 20,500, Benjamin 10,200, Dan 1700, and Asher 11,900. But the other five had decreased more than to balance that increase. Reuben had decreased 2770, Simeon 37,100, Gad 5150, Ephraim 8000, and Naphtali 8000. In this account we may observe, 1. that all the three tribes that were encamped under the standard of Judah, who was the ancestor of Christ, had increased, for his church shall be edified and multiplied. 2. That none of the tribes had increased so much as that of Manasseh, which in the former account was the smallest of all the tribes, only 32,200, while here it is one of the most considerable; and that of his brother Ephraim, which there was numerous, is here one of the least. Jacob had crossed hands upon their heads, and had preferred Ephraim before Manasseh, which perhaps the Ephraimites had prided themselves too much in, and had trampled upon their brethren the Manassites; but, when the Lord saw that Manasseh was despised, he thus multiplied him exceedingly, for it is his glory to help the weakest, and raise up those that are cast down. 3. That none of the tribes decreased so much as Simeon did; from 59,300, it such to 22,200, little more than a third part of what it was. One whole family of that tribe (namely Ohad, mentioned Exo 6:15) was extinct in the wilderness. Hence Simeon is not mentioned in Moses's blessing (Deu. 33), and the lot of that tribe in Canaan was inconsiderable, only a canton out of Judah's lot, Jos 19:9. Some conjecture that most of those 24,000 who were cut off by the plague for the iniquity of Peor were of that tribe; for Zimri, who was a ringleader in that iniquity, was a prince of that tribe, many of whom therefore were influenced by his example to follow his pernicious ways.
III.In the account of the tribe of Reuben mention is made of the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, who were of that tribe, in confederacy with Korah a Levite, Num 26:9-11. Though the story had been largely related but a few chapters before, yet here it comes in again, as fit to be had in remembrance and thought of by posterity, whenever they looked into their pedigree and pleased themselves with the antiquity of their families and the glory of their ancestors, that they might call themselves a seed of evil doers. Two things are here said of them: - 1. That they had been famous in the congregation, Num 26:9. Probably they were remarkable for their ingenuity, activity, and fitness for business: - That Dathan and Abiram that might have been advanced in due time under God and Moses; but their ambitious spirits put them upon striving against God and Moses, and when they quarrelled with the one they quarrelled with the other. And what was the issue? 2. Those that might have been famous were made infamous: they became a sign, Num 26:10. They were made monuments of divine justice; God, in their ruin, showed himself glorious in holiness, and so they were set up for a warning to all others, in all ages, to take heed of treading in the steps of their pride and rebellion. Notice is here taken of the preservation of the children of Korah (Num 26:11); they died not, as the children of Dathan and Abiram did, doubtless because they kept themselves pure from the infection, and would not join, no, not with their own father, in rebellion. If we partake not of the sins of sinners, we shall not partake of their plagues. These sons of Korah were afterwards, in their posterity, eminently serviceable to the church, being employed by David as singers in the house of the Lord; hence many psalms are said to be for the sons of Korah: and perhaps they were made to bear his name so long after, rather than the name of any other of their ancestors, for warning to themselves, and as an instance of the power of God, which brought those choice fruits even out of that bitter root. The children of families that have been stigmatized should endeavour, by their eminent virtues, to roll away the reproach of their fathers.
Continue studying Numbers 26:29 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Numbers 26:29 is a pivotal entry within the second census of Israel, meticulously conducted on the plains of Moab as the nation stood poised to enter the Promised Land. This verse specifically delineates the lineage within the tribe of Manasseh, identifying the descendants of Machir and his son Gilead, who established the distinct clans of the Machirites and the Gileadites. This precise genealogical record was indispensable for establishing tribal and clan identities, assessing military strength, and, most critically, for the equitable and divinely ordained distribution of the land of Canaan among the various families of Israel, thereby ensuring the fulfillment of God's ancient covenant promises.
Context
Literary Context
Numbers 26:29 is situated within the comprehensive second census of Israel, detailed in Numbers 26. This enumeration stands in stark contrast to the initial census conducted at Mount Sinai, recorded in Numbers 1. The primary objective of this later census, taken nearly four decades after the first, was to count the new generation of Israelites who were eligible to inherit the Promised Land. The preceding generation, with the sole exceptions of Caleb and Joshua, had perished in the wilderness due to their collective disobedience and rebellion, particularly following the incident at Kadesh Barnea, as prophesied in Numbers 14:29-35. Consequently, this census served as a vital administrative and theological bridge, preparing the nation for the imminent conquest and settlement of Canaan by establishing the precise population size of each tribe and clan, which would directly inform the land allocation process described in subsequent chapters, such as the significant case of Zelophehad's daughters in Numbers 27.
Historical & Cultural Context
The historical setting for this census is the plains of Moab, situated directly east of the Jordan River and opposite the city of Jericho. This geographical location marked the critical threshold of the Promised Land, signifying a momentous transition in Israel's history from a nomadic existence to a settled agricultural life. Culturally, censuses in ancient Israel were far more than mere demographic exercises; they were intrinsically linked to military readiness, systems of taxation, and, most importantly, the intricate tribal inheritance system. Land was to be allocated by lot, but its distribution within each tribe was fundamentally based on family units, or clans (mishpachah). The meticulous recording of patrilineal descent, as exemplified in this verse with Machir and Gilead, was essential to ensure that each family received its rightful and divinely appointed portion of the land, thereby preserving the established divine order and preventing future disputes. The prominence of Machir and Gilead is particularly significant, as their descendants would play crucial roles in the settlement of the Transjordan region, especially the fertile territory known as Gilead, as further elaborated in Joshua 13.
Key Themes
This verse, and indeed the entire census it belongs to, powerfully underscores several foundational themes. Firstly, it highlights God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, specifically the promise of land to Abraham's descendants, first articulated in Genesis 12:7. Despite the previous generation's profound failures, God did not abandon His people but meticulously prepared the new generation for their promised inheritance. Secondly, it emphasizes divine order and meticulousness. The detailed enumeration of clans and families vividly demonstrates God's sovereign hand in organizing and preparing His people for their future, ensuring justice and equity in the distribution of land. This precision reflects God's inherent character as a God of order, not chaos or confusion. Thirdly, the passage points to the profound theme of inheritance and belonging. Each individual was an integral part of a larger family, clan, and tribe, and their identity and future were intrinsically linked to this communal structure and the specific land they were destined to inherit. This meticulous record-keeping reinforced their collective identity as the chosen people of God, destined for the land He had graciously promised.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Meaning "salesman." Machir was the only son of Manasseh explicitly mentioned by name in earlier accounts, such as Genesis 50:23. His significant prominence in this census highlights his status as the progenitor of a major clan within the tribe of Manasseh. The descendants of Machir, the Machirites, played a key role in the conquest and settlement of the Transjordanian territory, particularly the region of Gilead, demonstrating the fulfillment of tribal blessings and the importance of established lineages.
Likely meaning "heap of witness" (related to גַּלְעֵד, galʻêd). Gilead was the son of Machir and grandson of Manasseh. His name is not only a personal designation but also became indelibly linked with a significant and fertile region east of the Jordan River. This territory was eventually settled by his descendants, the Gileadites, and other Manassite clans, as recorded in Numbers 32:39-40. The naming of a prominent geographical area after a person underscores the deep and enduring connection between lineage, land, and identity in ancient Israelite culture.
Meaning "a family, i.e., circle of relatives; figuratively, a class (of persons), a species (of animals) or sort (of things); by extension a tribe or people." This term is crucial for understanding the social and administrative fabric of ancient Israel. A mishpachah refers to a clan or an extended family unit, larger than a single household but smaller than a full tribe. These clans served as the fundamental administrative units for military conscription, judicial matters, and, most critically, for the equitable distribution of land inheritance within the larger tribal structure. The repetition of "the family of the Machirites" and "the family of the Gileadites" in the verse underscores the distinct and significant identity of these specific sub-units within the tribe of Manasseh.
Verse Breakdown
"Of the sons of Manasseh:"
This opening phrase immediately situates the verse within the broader tribal enumeration of the census, identifying the specific tribal context for the lineage about to be detailed. It signals a focused shift from other tribes or other branches of Manasseh to concentrate on a particular, significant line within this tribe.
"of Machir, the family of the Machirites:"
This clause introduces Machir, identified as the firstborn son of Manasseh, and immediately associates him with his direct descendants, who are known as the "Machirites." This highlights Machir's importance as the progenitor of a substantial clan, a unit that would receive a significant portion of the tribal inheritance and play a prominent role in the settlement of the land.
"and Machir begat Gilead:"
This phrase explicitly clarifies the direct paternal lineage, establishing Gilead as the son of Machir. This direct genealogical link is vital for understanding the subsequent formation of the Gileadite clan and their specific claim to a designated territory, reinforcing the continuity of the family line.
"of Gilead [come] the family of the Gileadites."
This final clause identifies the second major clan within this lineage, the "Gileadites," who are directly descended from Gilead. The phrasing "of Gilead [come]" emphasizes that this clan derives its identity, name, and ultimately its territorial claim from him, further solidifying their distinct status and their right to the land associated with the region of Gilead.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in Numbers 26:29, and indeed throughout the entire chapter, is Genealogy. This meticulous listing of lineages serves not merely as a historical record but functions as a profound theological statement, underscoring God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His people and preparing them for their promised inheritance. The precise enumeration reinforces the divine order and establishes the legal and spiritual basis for land distribution. Furthermore, there is a clear element of Repetition with the recurring phrase "the family of the [name]ites," which serves to emphasize the distinct identity, significance, and administrative autonomy of each named clan within the larger tribal structure. This repetition ensures clarity and highlights the specific units that would receive land portions. The verse also employs Conciseness and Economy of Language, conveying crucial genealogical and organizational information in a direct, unadorned, and authoritative manner, characteristic of administrative and legal texts found throughout the Old Testament.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Numbers 26:29, though appearing as a dry genealogical entry, is profoundly rich in theological implications. It powerfully illustrates God's meticulous care, sovereign purpose, and unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His promises across generations. The detailed accounting of each family and clan underscores that God's covenant with Israel was not vague or abstract but precise, involving specific people and a tangible inheritance of land. This divine attention to detail assures us that God is intimately involved in the lives of His people, orchestrating events and providing for their future. It speaks to the importance of identity and belonging within God's chosen family, emphasizing that each individual and family unit has a unique place and purpose within His grand redemptive design. The census, in its entirety, stands as a testament to God's restorative grace, as He raises up a new generation to inherit what the previous one forfeited due to unbelief, demonstrating His unwavering commitment to His overarching redemptive plan for humanity.
Reflection and Application
While a census entry from ancient Israel might seem distant from our contemporary lives, Numbers 26:29 offers profound and enduring insights for believers today. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is a God of order, purpose, and meticulous faithfulness. Just as He meticulously accounted for each family and clan to ensure their rightful inheritance in the physical Promised Land, He cares deeply about every detail of our lives and has a divine purpose for each of us within His spiritual kingdom. This passage encourages us to cultivate a deep trust in God's sovereign plan, even when circumstances appear chaotic or uncertain, knowing that He is always working to fulfill His promises and bring about His good purposes. It also prompts us to reflect on our own spiritual lineage—the rich heritage of faith passed down through generations of believers—and to embrace our identity as integral members of God's vast, diverse family, the church. We are not isolated individuals but interconnected members of a larger body, called to steward spiritual blessings and actively participate in God's ongoing redemptive work in the world, preparing for our ultimate, eternal inheritance.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is so much detail given to genealogies and censuses in the Bible, especially in a book like Numbers?
The detailed genealogies and censuses in the Bible, particularly in the book of Numbers, serve multiple crucial purposes beyond mere historical record-keeping. Firstly, they function as legal and administrative documents. As vividly demonstrated in Numbers 26, the census was absolutely essential for determining the equitable allocation of land inheritance in Canaan, ensuring that each tribe and family received its rightful portion according to God's specific command. This meticulous process prevented disputes and established a clear, divinely sanctioned system of ownership. Secondly, these records served a vital military purpose, counting the able-bodied men eligible for warfare, as Israel was preparing for the imminent conquest of the Promised Land. Thirdly, and perhaps most profoundly, they are powerful theological statements. These meticulous records demonstrate God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His people and fulfilling His covenant promises, even through generations marked by wilderness wandering and rebellion. They unequivocally show that God's plan is precise, orderly, and sovereign, not haphazard or chaotic. For instance, the detailed lineage of Manasseh in Numbers 26:29 confirms the continuity of the tribal structure and their legitimate claim to specific territories, such as Gilead, as later elaborated in Joshua 17. Ultimately, these seemingly mundane details underscore God's sovereignty and His active, intimate involvement in the unfolding history of His people, guiding them steadfastly toward their promised destiny.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Numbers 26:29 is a specific genealogical record deeply rooted in the Old Covenant's administrative and land-inheritance system, it finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the New Testament. The meticulous accounting of Israelite families and their physical land inheritance foreshadows the ultimate, spiritual inheritance promised to all believers in Christ. Just as the Israelites were counted and organized for their earthly inheritance, believers are spiritually "counted" and incorporated into the spiritual family of God through faith in Jesus, thereby becoming co-heirs with Him in His glorious kingdom (Romans 8:17). The Promised Land, a tangible, physical inheritance, points to the far greater and imperishable spiritual inheritance of eternal life, adoption as sons and daughters, and a secure place in God's eternal kingdom, all of which are secured through Christ's perfect redemptive work on the cross (Ephesians 1:11-14). Jesus, as the true and ultimate heir of all things (Hebrews 1:2), mediates a new covenant that grants access to this imperishable inheritance, not based on physical lineage, tribal census, or earthly boundaries, but on spiritual birth and an unbreakable union with Him (Galatians 3:29). Thus, the detailed order and promise of land in Numbers ultimately point to the comprehensive and eternal provision found in Christ, who gathers all who believe into His glorious, multi-ethnic family, transcending all earthly genealogies and national distinctions.