Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And his sister Hammoleketh bare Ishod, and Abiezer, and Mahalah.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And his sister H269 Hammoleketh H4447 bare H3205 Ishod H379, and Abiezer H44, and Mahalah H4244.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
His sister Hammolekhet [the governor] bore Ish-Hod, Avi'ezer and Machlah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
These were the sons of Gilead son of Machir, the son of Manasseh. His sister Hammolecheth gave birth to Ishhod, Abiezer, and Mahlah.
Ask
American Standard Version
And his sister Hammolecheth bare Ishhod, and Abiezer, and Mahlah.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
His sister Hammolecheth bore Ishhod, and Abiezer, and Mahlah.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And his sister Molecheth bare Ishod, and Abiezer, and Mahalah.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And his sister Hammolecheth bare Ishhod, and Abiezer, and Mahalah.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,554 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:18 is a concise yet profoundly significant verse embedded within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Manasseh. It specifically highlights Hammoleketh, a sister within this lineage, stating, "And his sister Hammoleketh bare Ishod, and Abiezer, and Mahalah." This brief entry is remarkable for its explicit mention of a woman and her offspring in a section predominantly focused on male lines, underscoring the Chronicler's meticulous preservation of tribal identity, the divine recognition of all individuals, and the continuous unfolding of God's redemptive plan through successive generations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within 1 Chronicles chapter 7, which meticulously enumerates the genealogies of several Israelite tribes, including Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. The broader book of Chronicles, composed in the post-exilic period, serves a crucial purpose: to re-establish the identity, heritage, and continuity of the Israelite nation for those who had returned from Babylonian exile. Chapter 7, particularly verses 14-19, concentrates on the descendants of Manasseh. The pronoun "his" in 1 Chronicles 7:18 most plausibly refers to Gilead, the son of Machir, a prominent figure whose lineage is detailed in the preceding verses, specifically 1 Chronicles 7:14-17. The deliberate inclusion of Hammoleketh, a sister, within this predominantly male-focused lineage is a significant literary choice by the Chronicler, drawing attention to her unique importance within the family line and the broader tribal record.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The meticulous compilation of detailed genealogies was of paramount importance in post-exilic Israel. Following decades of Babylonian captivity, the returning exiles faced the monumental task of societal reconstruction, re-establishing land claims, affirming tribal identities, and ensuring the purity of priestly and Levitical lines. Genealogies functioned as vital legal and historical documents, validating claims to land inheritance, tribal affiliation, and eligibility for sacred service. In a patriarchal society where lineages were almost exclusively traced through the male line, the explicit mention of a woman like Hammoleketh and her children is exceptional. This singularity strongly suggests that she held a position of unusual prominence, perhaps due to her status, the significance of her descendants, or the necessity of clarifying a specific branch of the family tree that was critical for the tribe's continuity and the accurate preservation of its heritage.
  • Key Themes: 1 Chronicles 7:18 contributes to several overarching themes pervasive throughout the book of Chronicles. Firstly, it underscores the Genealogical Precision inherent in the biblical record, reflecting God's meticulous care in preserving the lineage of His people and fulfilling His covenant promises. This theme is central to the Chronicler's objective of connecting the post-exilic community to their ancient roots and demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness to figures like Abraham and David. Secondly, the Inclusion of Women like Hammoleketh, though rare in such lists, highlights that God's comprehensive plan acknowledges the vital contributions of all individuals, irrespective of gender, in the unfolding of redemptive history. This subtly challenges the common perception of biblical genealogies as exclusively male-centric. Finally, the verse reinforces the theme of Continuity and Heritage, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving the tribes of Israel through successive generations, ensuring the unbroken thread of His covenant people until the coming of the Messiah, a truth powerfully echoed in the genealogies of Jesus found in Matthew 1 and Luke 3.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Hammoleketh (Hebrew, Môleketh', H4447): This name is highly unusual and carries significant meaning. The Hebrew word Môleketh (מֹלֶכֶת) is derived from the root mālak, meaning "to reign" or "to be king/queen." With the definite article "Ha-" (הַ) prefixed, her name literally translates to "the queen" or "the reigning one." This unique designation in a genealogical list, where names typically describe characteristics or commemorate events, strongly suggests that Hammoleketh was a woman of exceptional status, influence, or perhaps her lineage held particular importance for the tribe of Manasseh. Her prominence is not merely implied but explicitly stated through her very name, setting her apart from many other unnamed women in biblical genealogies.
  • bare (Hebrew, yâlad', H3205): This verb (H3205) is a primitive root meaning "to bear young" or "to beget." In the context of 1 Chronicles 7:18, it emphasizes Hammoleketh's role as a mother and the progenitor of the three individuals named. The act of "bearing" highlights the continuity of the family line and the divine blessing of fruitfulness, which was highly valued in ancient Israelite society. The verb underscores the vital role of women in the perpetuation of the tribal lineage, even within genealogies that primarily focus on male succession.
  • Abiezer (Hebrew, ʼĂbîyʻezer', H44): Meaning "father of help" or "my father is help." This name is particularly significant because Abiezer was also the name of a prominent clan within the tribe of Manasseh, from which the renowned judge Gideon hailed (Judges 6:11). The mention of Abiezer here likely serves to connect this specific branch of Manasseh's descendants to a well-known and important historical clan, further solidifying the tribal identity and historical continuity that the Chronicler sought to establish for the post-exilic community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And his sister Hammoleketh": This opening clause immediately draws attention to a female figure in a context overwhelmingly dominated by male names. The phrase "his sister" connects her directly to the male lineage previously mentioned, most likely Gilead (as detailed in 1 Chronicles 7:14-17), establishing her precise place within the family tree of Manasseh. Her distinctive name, "Hammoleketh," meaning "the queen," signifies her unique status and importance, suggesting she was not merely a passive link in the chain but a figure of considerable standing or influence within her family or tribe.
  • "bare Ishod, and Abiezer, and Mahalah": This part of the verse meticulously details Hammoleketh's direct offspring. The verb "bare" (וַתֵּלֶד, vattēled) emphasizes her active role as a mother and the progenitor of these three individuals. Ishod, Abiezer, and Mahalah represent the continuation of this specific branch of the Manassite lineage. The inclusion of these names, particularly Abiezer with its clear connection to a significant clan in Israelite history, reinforces the meticulous nature of the genealogy and its overarching purpose in tracing and validating tribal lines for the post-exilic community, ensuring their heritage and claims were accurately preserved.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:18, and indeed throughout much of the book of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is far more than a mere dry list of names; it functions as a profound theological statement. The Chronicler employs genealogy to establish the legitimacy, continuity, and divine preservation of the Israelite people, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His covenant line despite periods of exile and dispersion. The explicit mention of Hammoleketh and her remarkably distinctive name can also be interpreted as a form of Emphasis or Highlighting. This deliberate inclusion draws the reader's attention to her unique role and significance, serving to underscore the completeness and meticulousness of the historical record. Her presence implicitly acknowledges the vital, though often unrecorded, contributions of women within the broader narrative of God's people, even within a patriarchal societal framework. The meticulous listing of names and family connections serves to reinforce the overarching historical and theological truth that God remembers and actively works through every individual in His grand redemptive plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 7:18, though brief in its textual footprint, offers profound theological insights. It underscores God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign hand in preserving His people through countless generations. The very existence of such precise genealogies testifies to God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, ensuring the continuity of the chosen lineage through which His redemptive plan would ultimately unfold. The inclusion of Hammoleketh, a woman with a remarkably significant name ("the queen"), subtly highlights the divine recognition of every individual's contribution, regardless of societal prominence or gender, in the grand tapestry of salvation history. It serves as a powerful reminder that God sees and values those who might be overlooked in human records, weaving their lives into His overarching narrative of grace, preservation, and covenant fidelity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In a world often consumed by the pursuit of fame, recognition, and overt accomplishments, 1 Chronicles 7:18 offers a profound spiritual reminder: God's economy values faithfulness and presence, even in roles that might seem obscure or unremarkable by human standards. The deliberate inclusion of Hammoleketh, a woman whose brief mention belies her apparent significance, teaches us that every individual, regardless of how briefly mentioned or seemingly minor their contribution, is known intimately by God and plays a vital, irreplaceable part in His grand narrative. Her unique name, "the queen," suggests a hidden significance or enduring influence, prompting us to consider the often-unseen contributions of individuals, particularly women, throughout history and within our own communities. This verse encourages us to embrace our own unique place in God's unfolding story, recognizing that our lineage—whether physical or spiritual—connects us to a rich heritage of divine faithfulness. It challenges us to value every member of the body of Christ, understanding that each has a distinct and indispensable role in fulfilling God's purposes, echoing the profound truth that God is sovereign over all generations and faithfully preserves His people through every age.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the inclusion of a woman like Hammoleketh in a male-dominated genealogy challenge or expand my understanding of God's recognition and valuation of individuals?
  • What does this verse, as part of a meticulous record of lineage, teach me about the importance of my own "heritage"—both physical and spiritual—in God's overarching story?
  • In what ways might I be overlooking or underappreciating the "unseen" contributions of others in my community or church, similar to how Hammoleketh's significance might be easily missed by a casual reader?

FAQ

Why is Hammoleketh mentioned when most biblical genealogies focus on male lines?

Answer: The explicit mention of Hammoleketh in 1 Chronicles 7:18 is indeed noteworthy and exceptional. While biblical genealogies primarily trace male lines to establish tribal identity, land inheritance, and ultimately the lineage of the Messiah, the Chronicler occasionally includes women who were significant for specific reasons. In Hammoleketh's case, her name itself, "the queen," strongly suggests she was a woman of unusual prominence, status, or influence within her family or tribe. It is highly probable that her lineage was particularly important for clarifying a specific branch of the Manassite tribe, or perhaps she was a matriarch whose descendants formed a significant sub-clan. Her inclusion highlights the Chronicler's meticulousness in preserving the full tribal record and underscores the divine recognition of individuals who played a vital, though perhaps less obvious, role in the continuity of God's people and the unfolding of His plan.

What is the broader significance of genealogies in the Bible, especially in a book like 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Biblical genealogies serve multiple crucial purposes, particularly in a book like 1 Chronicles, which was written for the post-exilic community. They were essential for re-establishing identity, validating claims to land and tribal affiliation, and ensuring the purity of priestly and Levitical lines after the return from Babylonian captivity. These detailed lists connect the returning exiles to their ancient heritage, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises made to figures like Abraham and David. Far from being merely dry lists of names, they are profound theological statements affirming God's historical work and His steadfast commitment to His redemptive plan, which culminates in the genealogies of Jesus found in Matthew 1 and Luke 3. They illustrate God's sovereign hand in preserving a chosen lineage through which the Messiah would ultimately come.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The meticulous genealogical records in 1 Chronicles, including the brief but profoundly significant mention of Hammoleketh and her offspring, ultimately point to the grand narrative of God's faithfulness in preserving a chosen lineage for the advent of His Son. While 1 Chronicles 7:18 details a specific branch of Manasseh, the broader purpose of all biblical genealogies is to demonstrate God's unwavering commitment to His covenant promises, culminating in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Every name listed, every generation traced, serves as a testament to God's sovereign hand guiding history to its redemptive climax. The very existence of these preserved lines, despite exile, dispersion, and the passage of centuries, foreshadows the ultimate preservation of the line of David, from whom Jesus Christ would be born, as declared in Matthew 1:1. In Christ, the entire purpose of these genealogies finds its glorious fulfillment, as He is the true heir to all promises, the one in whom all the tribes and nations are united and blessed, as the apostle Paul teaches in Galatians 3:16. The continuity of God's people, so carefully documented in Chronicles, culminates in the eternal kingdom established by the Lamb of God, who fulfills all the hopes and promises embedded within these ancient family trees, bringing salvation to all who believe.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 1–19

We have here a short view given us,

I. Of the tribe of Issachar, whom Jacob had compared to a strong ass, couching between two burdens (Gen 49:14), an industrious tribe, that minded their country business very closely and rejoiced in their tents, Deu 33:18. And here it appears, 1. That they were a numerous tribe; for they had many wives. So fruitful their country was that they saw no danger of over-stocking the pasture, and so ingenious the people were that they could find work for all hands. Let no people complain of their numbers, provided they suffer none to be idle. 2. That they were a valiant tribe, men of might (Ch1 7:2, Ch1 7:5), chief men, Ch1 7:3. Those that were inured to labour and business were of all men the fittest to serve their country when there was occasion, The number of the respective families, as taken in the days of David, is here set down, amounting in the whole to above 145,000 men fit for war. The account, some think, was taken when Joab numbered the people, 2 Sa. 24. But I rather think it refers to some other computation that was made, perhaps among themselves, because it is said (Ch1 27:24) that that account was not inserted in the chronicles of king David, it having offended God.

II. Of the tribe of Benjamin. Some account is here given of this tribe, but much larger in the next chapter. The militia of this tribe scarcely reached to 60,000; but they are said to be mighty men of valour, Ch1 7:7, Ch1 7:9, Ch1 7:11. Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf, Gen 49:27. It was the honour of this tribe that it produced Saul the first king, and more its honour that it adhered to the rightful kings of the house of David when the other tribes revolted. Here is mention (Ch1 7:12) of Hushim the sons of Aher. The sons of Dan are said to be Hushim (Gen 46:23), and therefore some read Aher appellatively, Hushim - the sons of another (that is, another of Jacob's sons) or the sons of a stranger, which Israelites should not be, but such the Danites were when they set up Micah's graven and molten image among them.

III. Of the tribe of Naphtali, Ch1 7:13. The first fathers only of that tribe are named, the very same that we shall find, Gen 46:24, only that Shillem there is Shallum here. None of their descendents are named, perhaps because their genealogies were lost.

IV. Of the tribe of Manasseh, that part of it which was seated within Jordan; for of the other part we had some account before, Ch1 5:23, etc. Of this tribe observe, 1. That one of them married an Aramitess, that is, a Syrian, Ch1 7:14. This was during their bondage in Egypt, so early did they begin to mingle with the nations. 2. That, though the father married a Syrian, Machir, the son of that marriage, perhaps seeing the inconvenience of it in his father's house, took to wife a daughter of Benjamin, Ch1 7:15. It is good for the children to take warning by their father's mistakes and not stumble at the same stone. 3. Here is mention of Bedan (Ch1 7:17), who perhaps is the same with that Bedan who is mentioned as one of Israel's deliverers, Sa1 12:11. Jair perhaps, who was of Manasseh (Jdg 10:3), was the man.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.