Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Ulam; Bedan. These were the sons of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Ulam H198; Bedan H917. These were the sons H1121 of Gilead H1568, the son H1121 of Machir H4353, the son H1121 of Manasseh H4519.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The son of Ulam was B'dan. These were the descendants of Gil'ad the son of Makhir the son of M'nasheh.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The son of Ulam: Bedan.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Ulam: Bedan. These were the sons of Gilead the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Ulam: Bedan. These were the sons of Gilead the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonne of Vlam was Bedan. These were the sonnes of Gilead the sonne of Machir, the sonne of Manasseh.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And son of Ulam: Bedan. These are sons of Gilead son of Machir, son of Manasseh.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,553 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:17 meticulously traces a specific lineage within the tribe of Manasseh, identifying Ulam and his son Bedan as direct descendants of Gilead, Machir, and ultimately Manasseh himself. This verse, embedded within the extensive genealogical records of 1 Chronicles, serves a crucial purpose in affirming tribal identity, establishing land rights, and demonstrating the historical continuity of God's covenant people, particularly for the post-exilic community seeking to re-establish their heritage and rightful place within the restored nation of Israel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within 1 Chronicles 7, which provides detailed genealogies for several tribes, including Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. The broader context of 1 Chronicles 1-9 is a comprehensive genealogical record of Israel, tracing lines from Adam through the patriarchs, the twelve tribes, and finally to the inhabitants of Jerusalem after the exile. The Chronicler's intense focus on lineage underscores the paramount importance of tribal identity, land inheritance, and the preservation of the covenant community. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 7:14-19 offers a detailed account of the descendants of Manasseh, highlighting prominent families and their military strength, which was essential for the post-exilic community's sense of security and continuity. The precise tracing of Ulam and Bedan back to Manasseh via Gilead and Machir reinforces their legitimate place within the tribal structure.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled after the Babylonian exile, possibly in the late 5th or early 4th century BCE. For the returning exiles, their identity as God's chosen people had been severely challenged by displacement, foreign rule, and the loss of their land and temple. Genealogies served as vital legal and social documents, affirming land ownership, tribal affiliations, and eligibility for priestly or Levitical service. The mention of Gilead and Machir is particularly significant as Machir was Manasseh's firstborn, and his descendants, the Machirites, settled extensively in the region of Gilead, east of the Jordan River, as described in Numbers 32:39-40, "Numbers 32:39-40 - Machir's Descendants Settle Gilead". This connection reinforced territorial claims and historical roots for a people striving to rebuild their nation and religious life in the promised land, ensuring that even seemingly minor family lines were accounted for within the larger tribal framework.
  • Key Themes: The overarching themes in 1 Chronicles 7, and indeed the entire genealogical section, include Covenant Continuity, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His people through generations despite their failures and exiles. This meticulous record-keeping provides a tangible link between the past promises made to Abraham and the present reality of the returning community. Another key theme is Identity and Belonging, as these lists provided a clear framework for who belonged to Israel, their tribal affiliations, and their place within the land. The emphasis on specific families like those of Manasseh (see Joshua 17:1-6, "Joshua 17:1-6 - Inheritance of Manasseh") reinforces the theme of Inheritance and Land Rights, which was paramount for the post-exilic community re-establishing itself in the land of Canaan. The inclusion of figures like Ulam and Bedan, even if not widely known, highlights the comprehensive nature of God's care for every branch of His people.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Son (Hebrew, bên', H1121): This word, appearing multiple times in the verse, signifies not only a direct male offspring but also, in a broader sense, a descendant, member of a family or clan, or even a subject or nation. In genealogical contexts like this, it is foundational, linking individuals together to form a continuous lineage and establish familial relationships crucial for tribal identity and inheritance.
  • Gilead (Hebrew, Gilʻâḏ', H1568): Derived from a root suggesting "mound of testimony," Gilead is presented here as a personal name, the son of Machir. However, it is also the name of a significant region east of the Jordan River, where many of Manasseh's descendants settled. The inclusion of Gilead in this lineage connects Ulam and Bedan to a prominent branch of the tribe and, by extension, to a specific geographical territory, reinforcing historical land claims and tribal presence in the Transjordan.
  • Manasseh (Hebrew, Mᵉnashsheh', H4519): Meaning "causing to forget," Manasseh was the elder son of Joseph and the progenitor of one of the largest and most influential tribes of Israel. His name, given by Joseph in Genesis 41:51, "Genesis 41:51 - Joseph Names Manasseh" ("God has made me forget all my trouble and all my father's household"), reflects a moment of divine solace. As the tribal patriarch, his inclusion at the end of this genealogical chain firmly roots Ulam and Bedan within the larger tribal identity of Manasseh, establishing their legitimate place within the covenant community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Ulam; Bedan.": This initial clause introduces Ulam as a key figure in this specific branch of Manasseh's lineage, and Bedan as his direct descendant. The concise structure, typical of biblical genealogies, immediately establishes a direct parent-child relationship, setting the stage for tracing this line further back.
  • "These [were] the sons of Gilead,": This phrase serves as a crucial link, connecting Ulam and Bedan, and implicitly their broader family line, back to Gilead. By identifying them as "sons of Gilead," the verse establishes their place within a more prominent and recognized ancestral branch, indicating that Ulam's line descends from Gilead. The term "sons" here can refer to direct descendants or a broader clan or family unit.
  • "the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh.": This final segment of the verse completes the genealogical chain, tracing the lineage through Machir to the tribal patriarch Manasseh. This full tracing is essential for establishing the tribal identity and affiliation of Ulam and Bedan, rooting them firmly within one of the twelve tribes of Israel. It provides the necessary context for their place within the larger covenant community and its historical and territorial claims.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:17, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is a specific form of historical record-keeping, meticulously listing names and their familial connections to establish lineage, heritage, and identity. The Chronicler employs an Annalistic Style, presenting these records in a concise, factual manner, often using repetitive phrases like "the son of" to clearly delineate relationships and ensure clarity in tracing ancestry. The sheer volume and detail of these lists serve to emphasize Continuity and Completeness, assuring the post-exilic community of their unbroken link to their ancestral past and God's covenant promises. While seemingly dry, the careful enumeration of names and relationships implicitly conveys a profound theological message about God's faithfulness in preserving a people and a lineage through which His redemptive plan would unfold, highlighting divine sovereignty over human history.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The seemingly mundane list of names in 1 Chronicles 7:17 carries profound theological weight. It speaks to God's meticulous care for His people, demonstrating that every individual and family, no matter how obscure, has a place within His grand design. The preservation of these lineages, even through periods of national apostasy and exile, underscores God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises made to Abraham and his descendants. For the post-exilic community, these genealogies were not just historical records but living documents that affirmed their identity, land rights, and their rightful place in the ongoing story of God's redemptive work. They provided a tangible link to their heritage, fostering a sense of belonging and continuity in a time of rebuilding and renewed hope.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In a world that often emphasizes individual autonomy and detachment from the past, 1 Chronicles 7:17 reminds us of the profound importance of our roots, both physical and spiritual. For the ancient Israelites, knowing their lineage was foundational to their identity, land claims, and participation in the covenant community. For us today, while physical genealogies may not hold the same legal weight, the principle of belonging to a larger story remains vital. We are part of God's unfolding narrative, inheritors of a rich spiritual heritage passed down through generations of faithful believers. This verse encourages us to appreciate the "cloud of witnesses" who have gone before us, to understand that our faith is not isolated but connected to a vast, historical tapestry of God's work. It challenges us to live in a way that honors this heritage, faithfully stewarding the spiritual legacy we have received and contributing to the ongoing story for future generations. Our identity is not solely self-defined but deeply rooted in God's eternal purposes and His covenant community, reminding us that even seemingly small details in God's plan are significant.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding the importance of ancient genealogies like this one deepen your appreciation for God's meticulous care for His people throughout history?
  • In what ways does your own personal or spiritual heritage influence your identity and sense of belonging today?
  • What does God's faithfulness in preserving these lineages teach you about His commitment to His promises, even when circumstances seem bleak?
  • How can we, as modern believers, better recognize and honor the spiritual "lineage" of faith that has been passed down to us?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in books like 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies are crucial in the Bible for several reasons. For the ancient Israelites, they served as legal documents, establishing tribal identity, land inheritance rights, and eligibility for priestly or Levitical service. They were vital for maintaining social order and ensuring the continuity of the covenant community. Theologically, genealogies demonstrate God's faithfulness in preserving a chosen people and a specific lineage through which His redemptive plan would unfold, ultimately leading to the Messiah. In 1 Chronicles, specifically, they helped the post-exilic community re-establish their identity and connection to their historical roots and the promises of God, as seen in the detailed records of tribes like Manasseh and Ephraim in 1 Chronicles 7, "1 Chronicles 7 - Genealogies of Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher".

What is the significance of "Gilead" in this verse?

Answer: Gilead is significant because it is both a personal name (son of Machir) and a prominent geographical region east of the Jordan River. The descendants of Machir, Manasseh's firstborn, settled extensively in this territory. Therefore, mentioning Gilead in this genealogy not only traces a specific family line but also connects it to a particular land claim and historical presence within the tribal allocation of Manasseh. This connection to a specific territory, as detailed in passages like Numbers 32:39-40, "Numbers 32:39-40 - Machir's Descendants Settle Gilead", was crucial for the identity and legal standing of the Israelite tribes, reinforcing their historical claim to the land.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 7:17 meticulously traces an ancient lineage, its ultimate significance points towards the grander genealogical story of God's redemptive plan, culminating in Jesus Christ. The careful preservation of these family lines, even seemingly obscure ones, underscores God's sovereign hand in preparing the way for the Messiah. Jesus's own genealogies, recorded in Matthew 1:1-17, "Matthew 1:1-17 - The Genealogy of Jesus Christ" and Luke 3:23-38, "Luke 3:23-38 - The Genealogy of Jesus Christ", are not merely historical records but profound theological declarations, affirming His rightful claim as the Son of David, the Son of Abraham, and ultimately, the Son of God. He is the true heir to all the promises made to Israel, the ultimate "seed" through whom all nations would be blessed (Galatians 3:16, "Galatians 3:16 - The Seed is Christ"). Through His atoning work, believers are no longer defined by their earthly lineage but are adopted into God's family, becoming spiritual descendants of Abraham and co-heirs with Christ (Romans 8:17, "Romans 8:17 - Heirs with Christ" and Ephesians 1:5, "Ephesians 1:5 - Adoption as Sons"). Thus, the seemingly dry names of 1 Chronicles 7:17 contribute to the rich tapestry of God's faithfulness, pointing forward to the one who would perfectly fulfill all the hopes and promises embedded within Israel's ancestral story, bringing all who believe into His eternal family.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 1–19

We have here a short view given us,

I. Of the tribe of Issachar, whom Jacob had compared to a strong ass, couching between two burdens (Gen 49:14), an industrious tribe, that minded their country business very closely and rejoiced in their tents, Deu 33:18. And here it appears, 1. That they were a numerous tribe; for they had many wives. So fruitful their country was that they saw no danger of over-stocking the pasture, and so ingenious the people were that they could find work for all hands. Let no people complain of their numbers, provided they suffer none to be idle. 2. That they were a valiant tribe, men of might (Ch1 7:2, Ch1 7:5), chief men, Ch1 7:3. Those that were inured to labour and business were of all men the fittest to serve their country when there was occasion, The number of the respective families, as taken in the days of David, is here set down, amounting in the whole to above 145,000 men fit for war. The account, some think, was taken when Joab numbered the people, 2 Sa. 24. But I rather think it refers to some other computation that was made, perhaps among themselves, because it is said (Ch1 27:24) that that account was not inserted in the chronicles of king David, it having offended God.

II. Of the tribe of Benjamin. Some account is here given of this tribe, but much larger in the next chapter. The militia of this tribe scarcely reached to 60,000; but they are said to be mighty men of valour, Ch1 7:7, Ch1 7:9, Ch1 7:11. Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf, Gen 49:27. It was the honour of this tribe that it produced Saul the first king, and more its honour that it adhered to the rightful kings of the house of David when the other tribes revolted. Here is mention (Ch1 7:12) of Hushim the sons of Aher. The sons of Dan are said to be Hushim (Gen 46:23), and therefore some read Aher appellatively, Hushim - the sons of another (that is, another of Jacob's sons) or the sons of a stranger, which Israelites should not be, but such the Danites were when they set up Micah's graven and molten image among them.

III. Of the tribe of Naphtali, Ch1 7:13. The first fathers only of that tribe are named, the very same that we shall find, Gen 46:24, only that Shillem there is Shallum here. None of their descendents are named, perhaps because their genealogies were lost.

IV. Of the tribe of Manasseh, that part of it which was seated within Jordan; for of the other part we had some account before, Ch1 5:23, etc. Of this tribe observe, 1. That one of them married an Aramitess, that is, a Syrian, Ch1 7:14. This was during their bondage in Egypt, so early did they begin to mingle with the nations. 2. That, though the father married a Syrian, Machir, the son of that marriage, perhaps seeing the inconvenience of it in his father's house, took to wife a daughter of Benjamin, Ch1 7:15. It is good for the children to take warning by their father's mistakes and not stumble at the same stone. 3. Here is mention of Bedan (Ch1 7:17), who perhaps is the same with that Bedan who is mentioned as one of Israel's deliverers, Sa1 12:11. Jair perhaps, who was of Manasseh (Jdg 10:3), was the man.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.