TRV
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Chronicles 27:16–34. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here an account,
I.Of the princes of the tribes.
Something of the ancient order instituted by Moses in the wilderness was still kept up, that every tribe should have its prince or chief. It is probable that it was kept up all along, either by election or by succession, in the same family; and those are here named who were found in that office when this account was taken. Elihu, or Eliab, who was prince of Judah, was the eldest son of Jesse, and descended in a right line from Nahshon and Salmon, the princes of this tribe in Moses's time. Whether these princes were of the nature of lord-lieutenants that guided them in their military affairs, or chief-justices that presided in their courts of judgment, does not appear. Their power, we may suppose, was much less now that all the tribes were united under one king than it had been when, for the most part, they acted separately. Our religion obliges us to be subject, not only to the king as supreme, but unto governors under him (Pe1 2:13, Pe1 2:14), the princes that decree justice. Of Benjamin was Jaaziel the son of Abner, Ch1 27:21. Though Abner was David's enemy, and opposed his coming to the throne, yet David would not oppose the preferment of his son, but perhaps nominated him to this post of honour, which teaches us to render good for evil.
II.Of the numbering of the people, Ch1 27:23, Ch1 27:24. It is here said,
1.That when David ordered the people to be numbered he forbade the numbering of those under twenty years old, thinking thereby to save the reflection which what he did might otherwise cast upon the promise that they should be innumerable; yet it was but a poor salvo, for it had never been customary to number those under twenty, and the promise of their numbers chiefly respected the effective men.
2.That the account which David took of the people, in the pride of his heart, turned to no good account; for it was never perfected, nor done with exactness, nor was it ever recorded as an authentic account. Joab was disgusted with it, and did it by halves; David was ashamed of it, and willing it should be forgotten, because there fell wrath for it against Israel. A good man cannot, in the reflection, please himself with that which he knows God is displeased with, cannot make use of that, nor take comfort in that, which is obtained by sin.
III.Of the officers of the court.
1.The rulers of the king's substance (as they are called, Ch1 27:31), such as had the oversight and charge of the king's tillage, his vineyards, his olive-yards, his herds, his camels, his asses, his flocks. Here are no officers for state, none for sport, no master of the wardrobe, no master of the ceremonies, no master of the horse, no master of the hounds, but all for service, agreeable to the simplicity and plainness of those times. David was a great soldier, a great scholar, and a great prince, and yet a great husband of his estate, kept a great deal of ground in his own hand, and stocked it, not for pleasure, but for profit; for the king himself is served of the field, Ecc 5:9. Those magistrates that would have their subjects industrious must themselves be examples of industry and application to business. We find, however, that afterwards the poor of the land were thought good enough to be vine-dressers and husbandmen, Kg2 25:12. Now David put his great men to preside in these employments.
2.The attendants on the king's person. They were such as were eminent for wisdom, being designed for conversation. His uncle, who was a wise man and a scribe, not only well skilled in politics, but well read in the scriptures, was his counsellor, Ch1 27:32. Another, who no doubt excelled in learning and prudence, was tutor to his children. Ahithophel, a very cunning man, was his counsellor: but Hushai, an honest man, was his companion and confidant. It does not appear that he had many counsellors; but those he had were men of great abilities. Much of the wisdom of princes is seen in the choice of their ministry. But David, though he had all these trusty and well-beloved cousins and counsellors about him, preferred his Bible before them all. Psa 119:24, Thy testimonies are my delight and my counsellors.
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 27:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Chronicles 27:24 serves as a concise, parenthetical interjection within King David's administrative records, recounting the significant, yet sinful, census he commanded. It highlights that Joab, David's military commander, began the numbering but could not complete it because divine wrath fell upon Israel as a direct consequence of this act of disobedience. Furthermore, the verse notes that the results of this ill-fated census were intentionally omitted from the official chronicles of King David, underscoring its nature as a national disgrace and a moment of profound divine judgment that the Chronicler deemed unworthy of positive remembrance.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is a striking and abrupt parenthetical note inserted into a chapter primarily dedicated to cataloging King David's extensive and meticulously organized administrative and military structure. Chapter 27 details the monthly divisions of army commanders, tribal leaders, and various royal officials, showcasing the stability and order of David's kingdom. Verse 24, however, breaks this administrative flow to briefly reference an earlier, well-known, and highly significant event in David's reign: the census. This seemingly out-of-place inclusion serves as a crucial theological commentary by the Chronicler, reminding the reader of the profound consequences of David's sin, even as David's accomplishments are being lauded. It points back to the more detailed accounts of this event found in 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21, which provide the full narrative of David's command, Joab's reluctance, God's judgment, and the subsequent plague. Its placement here, rather than in a chronological narrative, emphasizes its lasting theological significance as a stain on David's otherwise exemplary reign and a powerful reminder of divine sovereignty.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, a census was not inherently forbidden; indeed, the Law of Moses commanded censuses for military purposes or taxation (e.g., Numbers 1:2-3). However, David's census, as depicted in the parallel accounts, was problematic due to its motivation. It appears to have stemmed from a lack of trust in God's divine protection and provision, leaning instead on human strength and military might. Such an act could be interpreted as pride, a desire to boast in numbers rather than rely on the Lord, or even an attempt to expand royal power beyond divine sanction. The immediate consequence, divine "wrath" (often manifested as a plague in the Old Testament), was a common form of God's judgment against corporate sin in Israel, demonstrating His holiness and intolerance for disobedience. The concept of "chronicles" or official records was vital in ancient Near Eastern kingdoms, serving to legitimize rulers and preserve their legacy. The deliberate omission of this census from David's official chronicles speaks volumes about its perceived disgrace and the desire to suppress a public record of national failure and divine displeasure.
Key Themes
This verse, despite its brevity, powerfully contributes to several key themes prevalent in the books of Chronicles. Firstly, it underscores the sovereignty of God over human endeavors; He can interrupt and halt even the plans of kings when they deviate from His will. Secondly, it highlights the severe consequences of disobedience and pride, particularly for leaders, demonstrating that a leader's sin can have devastating corporate repercussions for the entire nation, as seen in the plague that followed (1 Chronicles 21:14). Thirdly, it reinforces the theme of God's holiness and justice, illustrating that He does not overlook sin, even in His chosen servants. Finally, the omission from the official record speaks to the Chronicler's theological agenda: to present a history that emphasizes the importance of obedience to God and the purity of worship, often downplaying or omitting details that might tarnish the image of ideal kings like David, unless they serve a didactic purpose to warn against sin. The census stands as a stark reminder that even a king "after God's own heart" could fall short and incur divine displeasure, emphasizing the constant need for humility and reliance on God's strength, not human might, as echoed in Psalm 20:7.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primitive root means "to bore, to wound, to dissolve; figuratively, to profane, to break, to begin." In this context, it specifically refers to the initiation of the census. The verb's broader semantic range, including "to profane," subtly hints at the problematic nature of David's command, suggesting that the very act of beginning this census was an "opening wedge" into an action that would ultimately displease God and lead to profanation for Israel.
Derived from a root meaning "to splinter" or "to chip off," this word figuratively denotes "rage" or "strife," and in this context, "divine indignation" or "wrath." Its usage here, "there fell wrath," emphasizes the sudden, overwhelming, and direct nature of God's judgment. It signifies a righteous and fierce anger against sin, indicating the gravity with which God viewed David's action and its implications for the nation, manifesting as a devastating plague.
This word fundamentally means "a word," but by implication, it refers to "a matter," "a thing," or "an act." In the plural, as used here in conjunction with "days" (Hebrew, yôwm), it forms the phrase "words of the days" or "chronicles," referring to official historical records or annals kept by the kings. The deliberate statement that the census "was not put in the account of the chronicles" signifies its intentional exclusion, marking the event as a national disgrace or an act deemed unworthy of positive remembrance in the official history, highlighting the shame and divine disapproval associated with it.
Verse Breakdown
"Joab the son of Zeruiah began to number, but he finished not"
This clause identifies Joab, David's loyal but often ruthless commander and nephew (son of Zeruiah, David's sister), as the one tasked with executing the census. It explicitly states that the task was initiated but remained incomplete. This incompleteness was not due to human failure or logistical challenges, but due to divine intervention, setting the stage for the subsequent explanation of God's judgment. Joab himself had expressed reservations about the census, indicating its questionable nature from the outset.
"because there fell wrath for it against Israel"
This is the pivotal explanatory clause, revealing the divine cause for the census's interruption and incompleteness. The "wrath" is God's righteous judgment, which "fell" suddenly and decisively upon the nation of Israel. This wrath was a direct consequence of the census, highlighting that David's sin, though personal in its origin, had corporate repercussions, leading to a devastating plague upon the people. The phrase "for it" (H2063, zôʼth) directly links the divine punishment to the specific act of the census.
"neither was the number put in the account of the chronicles of king David"
This final clause describes the lasting historical and theological consequence of the sinful census. The results of the numbering were deliberately omitted from the official royal records, the "chronicles of king David." This exclusion underscores the event's negative connotation, signifying that it was a shameful or disgraceful episode that the Chronicler (and perhaps David himself) deemed unworthy of official documentation alongside the king's achievements. It serves as a stark reminder of a national transgression and its divine punishment.
Literary Devices
1 Chronicles 27:24 employs several literary techniques to convey its potent message. The most prominent is Parenthesis or Digression, as the verse abruptly interrupts the detailed administrative lists of chapter 27. This sudden shift in focus draws immediate attention to the census event, signaling its profound significance despite its brevity. The verse also utilizes Ellipsis or Understatement; while it only briefly mentions "wrath" and the unfinished task, it implicitly refers to the catastrophic plague and loss of life detailed elsewhere, relying on the reader's knowledge of the fuller narrative (e.g., 1 Chronicles 21). This brevity makes the statement even more impactful, creating a sense of gravity without needing to recount all the gruesome details. Furthermore, the verse functions as a form of Theological Commentary. By highlighting the divine wrath and the omission from official records, the Chronicler is not merely reporting facts but offering a theological interpretation of David's reign, emphasizing God's active involvement in human affairs and His unyielding judgment against sin, even in the life of His chosen king. The stark contrast between the meticulous organization of David's kingdom and this single, unrecorded failure serves to highlight the spiritual over the purely administrative.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Chronicles 27:24 powerfully encapsulates the biblical principle that human pride and self-reliance, especially in leadership, invite divine judgment. David's census, born out of a desire to quantify his strength rather than trust in God's promises, directly led to catastrophic consequences for the entire nation. This brief verse serves as a theological anchor, reminding us that God's sovereignty extends even to interrupting human plans and that His holiness demands a response to sin. The omission of the census from the official chronicles further emphasizes the shame and divine disapproval associated with such an act, underscoring the importance of humility and faithful dependence on God in all endeavors. It teaches that true security and strength are found not in human numbers or achievements, but in the Lord's unfailing power and provision.
Reflection and Application
1 Chronicles 27:24 offers timeless lessons for believers today. It serves as a potent warning against the subtle dangers of pride and self-reliance, even when disguised as prudent planning or administrative efficiency. Just as David was tempted to count his military might rather than fully trust in God's power, we too can fall into the trap of relying on our own resources, intellect, or achievements, forgetting that true strength and security come only from the Lord. This verse reminds us that our actions, especially those born from a lack of faith or a desire for human glory, can have far-reaching and unintended consequences, not just for ourselves but for those around us. It calls us to a posture of humility, constant repentance, and unwavering dependence on God's grace and provision, recognizing that His sovereignty can interrupt our plans and bring about His will, even through judgment. The omission of the census from David's chronicles also prompts us to consider what "records" we are building in our lives – are they records of faithful obedience and trust in God, or are they marred by self-sufficiency and pride, ultimately leading to divine displeasure? This verse compels us to examine our motivations, ensuring that our pursuits are rooted in faith and submission to God, rather than a reliance on human metrics or a desire for self-exaltation.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was the census considered a sin?
The Bible does not explicitly state that all censuses are sinful; indeed, some were commanded by God (e.g., Numbers 1). The sin in David's census, as detailed in 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21, lay primarily in its motivation. It appears to have stemmed from David's pride, a desire to boast in his military strength and numbers rather than relying solely on God's power and faithfulness. It might have also indicated a lack of faith in God's promise to make Israel exceedingly numerous, or an attempt to expand royal power and control beyond divine sanction. The Chronicler's account in 1 Chronicles 21:1 even attributes the incitement to Satan, highlighting its inherently evil nature and opposition to God's will. Thus, the act itself was a symptom of a deeper spiritual issue: a trust in human might over divine provision.
Why is this verse placed here, interrupting the administrative list?
The placement of 1 Chronicles 27:24, as a parenthetical note within a detailed list of David's administrative organization, serves a crucial theological purpose for the Chronicler. It acts as a stark reminder and a theological caveat, even amidst the celebration of David's successful reign and meticulous governance. By inserting this brief but potent reference to the sinful census and the divine wrath it incurred, the Chronicler emphasizes that even the greatest of kings, like David, were fallible and subject to God's judgment. It underscores the overarching theme that obedience to God is paramount, and disobedience, even if seemingly minor or motivated by pride, carries severe consequences. Its abruptness ensures that the reader does not overlook this critical moment of national failure and divine intervention, highlighting God's ultimate sovereignty over all human endeavors and His demand for absolute trust and humility from His chosen leaders.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
1 Chronicles 27:24, with its stark portrayal of human sin, divine wrath, and the devastating consequences of pride, powerfully points to the ultimate fulfillment found in Jesus Christ. David's census exposed the inherent weakness and sinfulness of even the most beloved of kings, demonstrating that human strength and numbers are ultimately insufficient and can even provoke God's righteous anger. The "wrath that fell for it against Israel" foreshadows the ultimate wrath of God against sin, a wrath that would justly fall upon humanity. However, in Christ, we see the perfect King, who never relied on human might or numbers but perfectly trusted in His Father's will, even unto death. The judgment that fell upon Israel for David's sin finds its ultimate and redemptive fulfillment in the cross, where the full weight of God's wrath against the sin of the world was poured out, not on a people, but on the sinless Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!. As Isaiah 53:5 prophesies, "He was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed." The "account" of our sin, which would lead to judgment and be a shameful omission from God's book of life, is, through Christ, not merely omitted but completely blotted out and nailed to the cross, as Colossians 2:13-14 proclaims, "[He] canceled the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross." Where David's sin brought death, Christ's sacrifice brings life and reconciliation, demonstrating God's love in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. He became sin for us, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God (2 Corinthians 5:21).