Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Tola; Uzzi, and Rephaiah, and Jeriel, and Jahmai, and Jibsam, and Shemuel, heads of their father's house, to wit, of Tola: they were valiant men of might in their generations; whose number was in the days of David two and twenty thousand and six hundred.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Tola H8439; Uzzi H5813, and Rephaiah H7509, and Jeriel H3400, and Jahmai H3181, and Jibsam H3005, and Shemuel H8050, heads H7218 of their father's H1 house H1004, to wit, of Tola H8439: they were valiant men H1368 of might H2428 in their generations H8435; whose number H4557 was in the days H3117 of David H1732 two H8147 and twenty H6242 thousand H505 and six H8337 hundred H3967.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Tola were: 'Uzi, Refayah, Yeri'el, Yachmai, Yivsam and Sh'mu'el. They were heads of their fathers' clans, descended from Tola; they were strong, brave men in their generations. In the time of David they numbered 22,600.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Tola: Uzzi, Rephaiah, Jeriel, Jahmai, Ibsam, and Shemuel, the heads of their families. In the days of David, 22,600 descendants of Tola were numbered in their genealogies as mighty men of valor.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Tola: Uzzi, and Rephaiah, and Jeriel, and Jahmai, and Ibsam, and Shemuel, heads of their fathers’ houses, to wit, of Tola; mighty men of valor in their generations: their number in the days of David was two and twenty thousand and six hundred.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Tola: Uzzi, and Rephaiah, and Jeriel, and Jahmai, and Ibsam, and Shemuel, heads of their fathers’ houses, of Tola; mighty men of valor in their generations: their number in the days of David was twenty-two thousand six hundred.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of Tola, Vzzi, and Rephaiah, and Ieriel, and Iahmai, and Iibsam, and Shemuel, heads in the housholdes of their fathers. Of Tola were valiant men of warre in their generations, whose nomber was in the dayes of Dauid two and twentie thousand, and sixe hundreth.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Tola: Uzzi, and Rephaiah, and Jeriel, and Jahmai, and Jibsam, and Shemuel, heads of the house of their fathers, even of Tola, mighty of valour in their generations: their number in the days of David is twenty and two thousand and six hundred.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:2 meticulously catalogues a significant segment of the tribe of Issachar, specifically detailing the descendants of Tola. It names six prominent individuals who served as "heads of their father's house," highlighting their esteemed leadership within their respective clans. The verse further characterizes these men as "valiant men of might" across their generations, underscoring a consistent legacy of strength and capability. Crucially, it provides a precise census figure of twenty-two thousand six hundred for this lineage during the reign of King David, emphasizing their considerable numerical contribution to the kingdom's military and societal fabric. This entry, within the broader genealogies of 1 Chronicles, underscores the divine preservation of tribal identity, the importance of capable leadership, and the numerical strength of God's people as foundational elements for the post-exilic community.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is intricately woven into the expansive genealogical tapestry that forms the initial nine chapters of 1 Chronicles. Following the comprehensive lists of Adam's descendants and the major tribes, 1 Chronicles 7:1-5 focuses specifically on the tribe of Issachar, one of Leah's sons. Verse 2 elaborates on Tola, Issachar's firstborn, providing a detailed enumeration of his direct descendants and their numerical strength. The Chronicler's deliberate inclusion of such granular detail serves a critical purpose: to establish an unbroken lineage from the patriarchs to the post-exilic community. These genealogies are not mere historical records but function as a theological statement, affirming the continuity of God's covenant people and providing a foundational identity for those returning from exile, setting the stage for the subsequent historical narrative of the united monarchy and the temple.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Composed during the Persian period, likely after the Babylonian exile (c. 450-400 BCE), 1 Chronicles was written to a Jewish community grappling with a fragmented identity and a need for restoration. In ancient Israel, genealogies were paramount. They served as legal documents, validating claims to land inheritance, confirming tribal affiliations for social and religious order, establishing eligibility for priestly service, and tracing royal lineages. The specific mention of the "days of David" in this verse is highly significant. David's reign represented a golden age of national unity, military strength, and spiritual flourishing. By anchoring the strength and numbers of Tola's descendants to this period, the Chronicler sought to connect the contemporary, vulnerable community to a glorious past, reminding them of God's past blessings and providing a blueprint for national restoration, military readiness, and the re-establishment of a divinely ordered society.
  • Key Themes: 1 Chronicles 7:2 contributes significantly to several overarching themes pervasive throughout the book. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the preservation of lineage and tribal identity. For a community rebuilding after exile, maintaining a clear understanding of their heritage and tribal affiliations was crucial for social cohesion, land distribution, and the continuity of God's covenant promises. Secondly, the description of "valiant men of might" highlights the theme of national strength and military capability. This was vital for the defense and security of the nation, particularly in the formative years of the kingdom under David. This strength is implicitly linked to divine faithfulness and blessing, as the substantial number of descendants (22,600) reflects God's promise to multiply His people, demonstrating His sustained care despite historical challenges. This echoes the foundational promises made to Abraham, such as the pledge that his descendants would be as numerous as the stars in the heavens, as found in Genesis 15:5 and reiterated in Genesis 22:17. The Chronicler consistently emphasizes God's active role in fulfilling these promises through the growth and strength of His people.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Sons (Hebrew, bên', H1121): This primitive word signifies a son, as a builder of the family name, encompassing the widest sense of literal and figurative relationship. In this context, it refers to the direct male offspring of Tola, who are instrumental in continuing and building the family line, ensuring its numerical and social perpetuation.
  • Heads of their father's house (Hebrew, _rôʼsh bêt ʼâbôtām'_, H7218): This phrase combines H7218 (rôʼsh), meaning "head" (as chief, principal, ruler), and H1004 (bayith), meaning "house" (in the sense of family or household), with H1 (ʼâb), meaning "father." Together, it denotes individuals who held significant leadership and authority within their respective clans or extended families. They were not merely members but recognized leaders responsible for the well-being, administration, and representation of their family units, highlighting the patriarchal and structured nature of Israelite society and the importance of familial leadership.
  • Valiant men of might (Hebrew, _gibbôwr chayil'_, H1368): This powerful idiom combines H1368 (gibbôwr), signifying a powerful, mighty, or heroic individual, often a warrior, and H2428 (chayil), which can mean force, valor, strength, or an army. Combined, the phrase describes individuals who possess not only physical strength and courage but also competence, effectiveness, and often, a degree of wealth or influence. They were capable leaders, warriors, or men of substance who contributed significantly to the strength, security, and prosperity of their community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Tola; Uzzi, and Rephaiah, and Jeriel, and Jahmai, and Jibsam, and Shemuel": This opening clause initiates the specific enumeration of Tola's direct descendants, establishing the primary subjects of the verse. It meticulously lists six individuals, highlighting their distinct identities within the broader tribal structure and emphasizing the Chronicler's focus on individual lineage within the collective.
  • "heads of their father's house, [to wit], of Tola": This clarifies the esteemed leadership role of the named individuals. It indicates their prominence and authority within Tola's specific clan, underscoring their importance not merely as descendants but as recognized leaders responsible for the family's welfare and representation.
  • "[they were] valiant men of might in their generations": This descriptive clause provides crucial insight into the character and consistent capability of this lineage. It emphasizes their strength, courage, and effectiveness, suggesting a sustained quality of leadership and military prowess maintained throughout successive generations, indicating a legacy of competence and contribution.
  • "whose number [was] in the days of David two and twenty thousand and six hundred": This final clause provides a precise numerical census, anchoring the lineage's strength and size to a specific, significant historical period—the reign of King David. This large number underscores the considerable contribution this clan could make to the kingdom's military and societal fabric, reflecting their substantial presence and potential influence.

Literary Devices

The Chronicler employs several significant literary devices in 1 Chronicles 7:2 to convey its message effectively. Enumeration is primary, as the verse meticulously lists names and a precise numerical count. This exactitude emphasizes the detailed nature of the genealogical record and lends an air of historical authenticity and importance to the lineage. The phrase "valiant men of might" functions as a form of characterization, succinctly defining the essence of these individuals and, by extension, the entire lineage. This description is not merely factual but also serves as an idealization, presenting a model of strength, courage, and leadership for the post-exilic community to emulate. Furthermore, the explicit mention of "in the days of David" serves as historical anchoring, connecting this specific lineage to a golden age of Israelite history, thereby imbuing it with greater significance and relevance for the Chronicler's audience, fostering a sense of continuity and hope.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The meticulous detail of 1 Chronicles 7:2, like the broader genealogies, serves a profound theological purpose: it underscores God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His covenant people and their tribal identities through generations. This divine oversight ensures the continuity of His promises, particularly those concerning a numerous people and the eventual lineage of the Messiah. The emphasis on "valiant men of might" and their significant numbers also points to God's blessing and His desire for His people to be strong and capable, not just for their own sake, but for the flourishing of His kingdom and the fulfillment of His purposes on earth. It reminds the post-exilic community, and us today, that God is actively involved in the details of human history, working through generations to bring about His redemptive plan.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names and numbers might initially seem remote, 1 Chronicles 7:2 offers profound insights for contemporary reflection and application. It reminds us that God is a God of meticulous detail, caring for every individual and family line, even those not prominently featured in the grand narratives of salvation history. Just as the descendants of Tola were recognized as "heads of their father's house" and "valiant men of might," we are called to embody strength, courage, and integrity in our own spheres of influence. This valor is not solely physical prowess but encompasses spiritual fortitude, moral courage to stand for truth, and the diligent stewardship of our gifts and abilities for God's purposes and the good of our communities. The passage encourages us to embrace our spiritual heritage as believers, understanding that our lives, however seemingly ordinary, are intricately woven into God's extraordinary, sovereign plan, contributing to His ongoing work in the world and the building of His kingdom. We are called to be faithful stewards of our lineage, whether physical or spiritual, and to live with purpose and strength for His glory.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding God's meticulous care for ancient genealogies inform our view of His care for our individual lives today, even in seemingly insignificant details?
  • In what practical ways can we embody the spirit of "valiant men of might" in our contemporary contexts, demonstrating spiritual fortitude, moral courage, and effective service in our families, workplaces, and communities?
  • What is the significance of knowing our spiritual heritage as believers in Christ, and how does this understanding shape our identity, purpose, and contribution to God's grand narrative today?

FAQ

Why are these detailed genealogies so important in 1 Chronicles, especially for a post-exilic audience?

Answer: The detailed genealogies in 1 Chronicles served several crucial purposes for the post-exilic community. Firstly, they re-established and confirmed tribal identities, which had become fragmented during the exile, ensuring proper land inheritance and social order upon their return to the land. Secondly, they validated claims to priestly and royal lineages, which was essential for the re-establishment of temple worship and the hope for a future Davidic king. Thirdly, these lists provided a vital sense of continuity and connection to their rich heritage, reminding the people of God's faithfulness to His covenant promises despite the disruption of exile. They demonstrated that God's plan was still unfolding, and that the returned community was a direct continuation of the chosen people, as seen in the extensive lineage of Judah leading to David in 1 Chronicles 3.

What does "valiant men of might" truly imply beyond physical strength or military prowess?

Answer: The Hebrew phrase gibbôwr chayil (גִּבֹּרֵי חַיִל) is rich in meaning, extending beyond mere physical strength or military capability. While it often refers to warriors or brave soldiers, it also encompasses individuals of significant wealth, influence, and general competence. It describes those who are effective, successful, and honorable in their endeavors, whether in battle, administration, or contributing to the economic and social well-being of their community. For example, Boaz is described with this phrase in Ruth 2:1. Thus, it signifies a robust character, leadership qualities, and the ability to achieve great things for the benefit of their people and for God's purposes.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 7:2 focuses on the physical lineage and strength of an Old Testament tribe, it subtly foreshadows a greater "head of the house" and a more profound "might" found in Jesus Christ. The meticulous preservation of these genealogies ultimately served to trace the lineage that would lead to the Messiah, demonstrating God's sovereign hand in history to bring forth His ultimate plan of redemption. Jesus Christ is the true and ultimate "head of His father's house," not merely a human clan, but the very household of God, over which He rules as Son, superior to all others and foundational to the new covenant community (Hebrews 3:6). He is the archetypal "valiant man of might," whose strength is not limited to physical or military prowess, but is spiritual and redemptive, conquering sin, death, and the powers of darkness through His cross and resurrection (Colossians 2:15). The numerous descendants of Tola, counted in the thousands, prefigure the vast spiritual family of God—the church—composed of all who believe in Christ, a multitude from every nation, tribe, people, and language that no one can number, gathered before the throne of God (Revelation 7:9). In Christ, the promises of a numerous people and a mighty deliverer find their ultimate, eternal, and universal fulfillment.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 1–19

We have here a short view given us,

I. Of the tribe of Issachar, whom Jacob had compared to a strong ass, couching between two burdens (Gen 49:14), an industrious tribe, that minded their country business very closely and rejoiced in their tents, Deu 33:18. And here it appears, 1. That they were a numerous tribe; for they had many wives. So fruitful their country was that they saw no danger of over-stocking the pasture, and so ingenious the people were that they could find work for all hands. Let no people complain of their numbers, provided they suffer none to be idle. 2. That they were a valiant tribe, men of might (Ch1 7:2, Ch1 7:5), chief men, Ch1 7:3. Those that were inured to labour and business were of all men the fittest to serve their country when there was occasion, The number of the respective families, as taken in the days of David, is here set down, amounting in the whole to above 145,000 men fit for war. The account, some think, was taken when Joab numbered the people, 2 Sa. 24. But I rather think it refers to some other computation that was made, perhaps among themselves, because it is said (Ch1 27:24) that that account was not inserted in the chronicles of king David, it having offended God.

II. Of the tribe of Benjamin. Some account is here given of this tribe, but much larger in the next chapter. The militia of this tribe scarcely reached to 60,000; but they are said to be mighty men of valour, Ch1 7:7, Ch1 7:9, Ch1 7:11. Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf, Gen 49:27. It was the honour of this tribe that it produced Saul the first king, and more its honour that it adhered to the rightful kings of the house of David when the other tribes revolted. Here is mention (Ch1 7:12) of Hushim the sons of Aher. The sons of Dan are said to be Hushim (Gen 46:23), and therefore some read Aher appellatively, Hushim - the sons of another (that is, another of Jacob's sons) or the sons of a stranger, which Israelites should not be, but such the Danites were when they set up Micah's graven and molten image among them.

III. Of the tribe of Naphtali, Ch1 7:13. The first fathers only of that tribe are named, the very same that we shall find, Gen 46:24, only that Shillem there is Shallum here. None of their descendents are named, perhaps because their genealogies were lost.

IV. Of the tribe of Manasseh, that part of it which was seated within Jordan; for of the other part we had some account before, Ch1 5:23, etc. Of this tribe observe, 1. That one of them married an Aramitess, that is, a Syrian, Ch1 7:14. This was during their bondage in Egypt, so early did they begin to mingle with the nations. 2. That, though the father married a Syrian, Machir, the son of that marriage, perhaps seeing the inconvenience of it in his father's house, took to wife a daughter of Benjamin, Ch1 7:15. It is good for the children to take warning by their father's mistakes and not stumble at the same stone. 3. Here is mention of Bedan (Ch1 7:17), who perhaps is the same with that Bedan who is mentioned as one of Israel's deliverers, Sa1 12:11. Jair perhaps, who was of Manasseh (Jdg 10:3), was the man.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.