Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Shuppim also, and Huppim, the children of Ir, and Hushim, the sons of Aher.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Shuppim H8206 also, and Huppim H2650, the children H1121 of Ir H5893, and Hushim H2366, the sons H1121 of Aher H313.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
[More descendants of Binyamin:] Shupim, Hupim, the sons of 'Ir. Hushim, the son of another [of Isra'el's sons, namely, Dan].
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The Shuppites and Huppites were descendants of Ir, and the Hushites were descendants of Aher.
Ask
American Standard Version
Shuppim also, and Huppim, the sons of Ir, Hushim, the sons of Aher.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Shuppim also, and Huppim, the sons of Ir, Hushim, the sons of Aher.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Shuppim, and Huppim were ye sonnes of Ir, but Hushim was the sonne of another.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Shuppim and Huppim are sons of Ir; Hushim son of Aher.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,548 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:12 is a concise entry within the extensive genealogical records of the book of 1 Chronicles, specifically listing "Shuppim also, and Huppim, the children of Ir, [and] Hushim, the sons of Aher." While seemingly a simple enumeration of names, this verse, like others in the genealogies, serves a profound purpose in establishing the continuity and identity of the Israelite tribes in the post-exilic period, underscoring God's meticulous preservation of His people and their heritage amidst historical upheaval. It highlights the intricate and sometimes enigmatic nature of ancient lineage records, particularly through the enigmatic figure of "Aher."

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the broader genealogical section of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which meticulously traces the lineages of Israel from Adam through the various tribes. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 7 focuses on the descendants of Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. The genealogies are not always exhaustive or strictly linear, often presenting selective or abbreviated lists. Verse 12 appears amidst a section that seems to be dealing with Benjamin's descendants, yet the inclusion of "Aher" and his sons, particularly Hushim, introduces a textual puzzle. Hushim is elsewhere associated with the tribe of Dan, as seen in Genesis 46:23. This suggests that the Chronicler's genealogies are not merely dry lists but carefully constructed theological and historical summaries, sometimes incorporating fragments or allusions to other tribal lines, even if their primary focus is on the Davidic and priestly lines. The Chronicler's selective presentation often highlights the tribes of Judah, Levi, and Benjamin, crucial for the post-exilic community's identity and worship, while other tribes might receive less attention or be alluded to cryptically.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled in the post-exilic period, around the 5th to 4th centuries BCE, after the return of the Jewish people from Babylonian captivity. For a community rebuilding its national and religious life in Judah, genealogies were critically important. They served as legal documents to establish land claims, define tribal boundaries, affirm rights to priestly and Levitical service, and reinforce the distinct identity of the restored community. Knowing one's lineage was foundational to social order, religious participation, and a sense of continuity with their pre-exilic heritage and the covenant promises of God. The meticulous detail, even for seemingly obscure names, reflects the deep cultural value placed on ancestry and the preservation of communal memory in ancient Israel, vital for re-establishing the nation's identity and purpose after a period of displacement and assimilation.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of such detailed genealogies, including 1 Chronicles 7:12, contributes to several overarching themes in Chronicles. First, it powerfully demonstrates the divine preservation of lineage, showcasing God's faithfulness in maintaining His covenant people through generations, even through the traumatic experience of exile. The very existence of these lists after such upheaval testifies to God's enduring commitment to His promises, as seen in the continuation of the line from which the Messiah would eventually come (Matthew 1:1). Second, these lists underscore the importance of identity and continuity for the post-exilic community, providing a tangible link to their past, their land, and their covenant relationship with God. They were not a new people, but the same people, rooted in the promises given to Abraham (e.g., Genesis 12:1-3). Finally, the meticulous nature of these records, even with their complexities and occasional ambiguities (like "Aher"), speaks to the reliability and historical rootedness of God's Word, affirming that God's plan unfolds within real human history, meticulously recorded for future generations. The Chronicler's work emphasizes the enduring nature of God's covenant with Israel, particularly the Davidic covenant, which is foundational to the hope of a restored kingdom (e.g., 2 Samuel 7:12-16).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • bên (Hebrew, bên, H1121): This foundational Hebrew word, translated as "children" and "sons" in this verse, is derived from a root meaning "to build" (בָּנָה). It signifies a son as a "builder of the family name," encompassing a wide range of literal and figurative relationships, including grandsons, subjects, nations, or even qualities. In genealogies, it is crucial for establishing lineage and continuity, demonstrating the successive generations that uphold and extend the family line. Its presence here underscores the primary purpose of the Chronicler's work: to meticulously trace the continuation of Israel's families and tribes.
  • Chûwshîym (Hebrew, ḥūšîm, H2366): This name, meaning "hasters," appears in several biblical contexts. Most notably, a Hushim is listed as a son of Dan in Genesis 46:23 and another as a son of Benjamin in 1 Chronicles 8:11. The presence of "Hushim" here, identified as "the sons of Aher," strongly supports the theory that "Aher" is a cryptic reference to the tribe of Dan. If this "Hushim" is indeed the same figure or a descendant of the Danite Hushim, it provides a subtle but significant link to a tribe largely omitted elsewhere in Chronicles, demonstrating the Chronicler's intricate weaving of Israel's tribal history.
  • ʼAchêr (Hebrew, 'aḥer, H313): This name is highly unusual, as it literally means "another," "other," or "behind." Its appearance as a personal name is rare, leading scholars to propose several interpretations. While some suggest it is a unique personal name, it is more commonly interpreted as a cryptic reference or euphemism. One prominent theory, supported by the mention of "Hushim" (who is elsewhere identified as a son of Dan), posits that "Aher" is a veiled way of referring to the tribe of Dan. The tribe of Dan is conspicuously absent or given very little attention in the Chronicler's genealogies, possibly due to their early idolatry or their geographical distance. Thus, "Aher" might be a deliberate, albeit indirect, inclusion of a fragment of Dan's lineage, signifying "the other (tribe)" or "the one who came after" in the tribal lists. This interpretation highlights the Chronicler's selective and often allusive method of presenting Israel's history.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Shuppim also, and Huppim": These names represent two individuals or family lines. In the broader context of 1 Chronicles 7, they are typically associated with the tribe of Benjamin, though their precise relationship to other listed Benjaminite families can be complex due to the fragmented nature of some of these genealogies. Their inclusion here signifies the Chronicler's commitment to enumerating the diverse branches of Israel's tribal heritage, ensuring a comprehensive, if not always exhaustive, record.
  • "the children of Ir": This phrase identifies Shuppim and Huppim as descendants of a figure named Ir. The name "Ir" (עִיר, ‘îr) can mean "city" or "watchman." In some textual traditions, "Ir" is identified as a son of Benjamin (e.g., in the Septuagint for 1 Chronicles 7:12). This connection reinforces the Benjaminite context for Shuppim and Huppim, even as the subsequent clause introduces a potential deviation. The mention of "children" (Hebrew: bên) emphasizes the generational continuity central to these genealogies.
  • "[and] Hushim, the sons of Aher": This clause introduces Hushim and his father, Aher. As discussed in the Key Word Analysis, "Aher" is a highly debated term. The most compelling interpretation suggests that "Aher" is not a personal name but a cryptic reference to "another" tribe, specifically Dan, whose son Hushim is mentioned in Genesis 46:23. This interpretation suggests that the Chronicler, while focusing on the tribes of Judah, Levi, and Benjamin, subtly includes a representative from the tribe of Dan, perhaps acknowledging their existence without fully integrating them into the main genealogical narrative, possibly due to their historical apostasy or geographical distance. This makes 1 Chronicles 7:12 a fascinating example of the Chronicler's nuanced approach to Israel's complete tribal history.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:12 and the surrounding chapters is the extensive use of Lists or Catalogues. These are not merely dry historical records; they serve a profound theological and rhetorical purpose. By meticulously enumerating names and lineages, the Chronicler emphasizes the Continuity of God's covenant people through generations, even after the trauma of exile. The repetitive nature of "son of," "children of," and the listing of names creates a sense of Rhythm and Structure, reinforcing the ordered nature of God's dealings with His people. The inclusion of an enigmatic entry like "Aher" also introduces an element of Allusion or Cryptic Reference, inviting deeper textual engagement and revealing the Chronicler's sophisticated method of intertwining various strands of Israel's history and identity. The very act of listing names, even obscure ones, can be seen as a form of Affirmation, validating the existence and heritage of each family and tribe within the larger tapestry of God's chosen nation, assuring the post-exilic community of their legitimate place within God's ongoing plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 7:12, though a small part of a larger genealogical record, powerfully reinforces the theological truth of God's meticulous care for His people and His unwavering commitment to His covenant promises. The very act of preserving these detailed lineages, even for seemingly minor figures or obscure tribal fragments, underscores God's sovereignty over history and His faithfulness in maintaining a chosen people through whom His redemptive plan would unfold. These lists are not random; they are a testament to divine order and the purposeful unfolding of salvation history, demonstrating that every individual and family plays a part in God's grand design. For the post-exilic community, these genealogies were a tangible link to their past, a reminder of their identity as God's people, and a foundation for their future hope, providing assurance that God had not forgotten them despite their exile.

  • Genesis 10:32 - The comprehensive "Table of Nations" illustrates God's sovereign ordering of all humanity and the origins of various peoples, setting a precedent for detailed lineage records.
  • Ezra 2:59-63 - This passage from the post-exilic period highlights the critical importance of genealogical records for establishing identity and priestly legitimacy among the returning exiles, mirroring the Chronicler's concern.
  • Luke 3:23-38 - The New Testament genealogies of Jesus demonstrate the culmination of God's meticulous preservation of lineage, culminating in the promised Messiah.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the genealogies of 1 Chronicles might initially appear daunting or irrelevant to a modern reader, 1 Chronicles 7:12, like its surrounding verses, offers profound spiritual insights. It reminds us that God is a God of meticulous detail and order, who cares not only for grand narratives but also for the individual lives and family histories that comprise His people. Just as ancient Israel found their identity and hope in their physical lineage, believers today are called into a spiritual lineage through faith in Christ. We are part of a continuous story of God's faithfulness, stretching from Abraham to the present day, a story in which God meticulously works out His purposes. This verse encourages us to value our spiritual heritage, to understand that our lives are woven into a divine tapestry, and to trust that God's plans are unfolding with precision, even when we don't fully grasp every detail. It calls us to consider our place in God's ongoing story and to live in a way that honors the rich spiritual ancestry we have in Christ, recognizing that our lives, however seemingly small, contribute to His majestic plan.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 7:12, challenge or affirm your understanding of God's character?
  • In what ways does knowing your spiritual heritage (your place in God's family through Christ) provide you with identity and purpose today?
  • What "obscure" or seemingly insignificant details in your own life might God be meticulously weaving into His larger redemptive plan?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so long and seemingly uninteresting to a modern reader?

Answer: While they may appear tedious to contemporary readers, these genealogies were profoundly significant for their original audience, particularly the post-exilic community in Judah. They served crucial practical, legal, and theological purposes. Practically, they established tribal land rights, determined eligibility for priestly and Levitical service, and reinforced social order. Legally, they acted as public records proving identity and lineage. Theologically, they demonstrated God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His covenant people through generations, even after the trauma of exile. They provided a tangible link to their past, reminding them of their identity as God's chosen nation and reinforcing the continuity of God's promises, ultimately pointing towards the coming Messiah. Understanding their original function transforms them from mere lists into powerful theological statements about God's faithfulness and Israel's enduring identity, as seen throughout the book of 1 Chronicles.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The seemingly dry genealogies of 1 Chronicles, including the intricate details of 1 Chronicles 7:12, find their ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus. These meticulous records, which trace the lineages of Israel, are not merely historical curiosities but are divinely preserved threads in the tapestry of salvation history, all pointing to the promised Messiah. God's faithfulness in maintaining a specific lineage, even through obscure figures like "Aher" and "Hushim," underscores His sovereign plan to bring forth the "seed" who would crush the serpent's head (Genesis 3:15). The Chronicler's emphasis on the tribe of Judah and the Davidic line (e.g., 1 Chronicles 3:1-24) ultimately culminates in Jesus, who is presented in the New Testament as the Son of David and the Son of Abraham, the fulfillment of all covenant promises (Matthew 1:1 and Luke 3:23-38). Every name, every family, every tribal connection in these Old Testament lists contributes to the grand narrative of God's unwavering commitment to His redemptive plan, culminating in the arrival of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, the one through whom all the families of the earth would be blessed (Galatians 3:16). Thus, even a verse like 1 Chronicles 7:12, by affirming the continuity of God's people, implicitly testifies to the meticulous divine orchestration that prepared the way for Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 1–19

We have here a short view given us,

I. Of the tribe of Issachar, whom Jacob had compared to a strong ass, couching between two burdens (Gen 49:14), an industrious tribe, that minded their country business very closely and rejoiced in their tents, Deu 33:18. And here it appears, 1. That they were a numerous tribe; for they had many wives. So fruitful their country was that they saw no danger of over-stocking the pasture, and so ingenious the people were that they could find work for all hands. Let no people complain of their numbers, provided they suffer none to be idle. 2. That they were a valiant tribe, men of might (Ch1 7:2, Ch1 7:5), chief men, Ch1 7:3. Those that were inured to labour and business were of all men the fittest to serve their country when there was occasion, The number of the respective families, as taken in the days of David, is here set down, amounting in the whole to above 145,000 men fit for war. The account, some think, was taken when Joab numbered the people, 2 Sa. 24. But I rather think it refers to some other computation that was made, perhaps among themselves, because it is said (Ch1 27:24) that that account was not inserted in the chronicles of king David, it having offended God.

II. Of the tribe of Benjamin. Some account is here given of this tribe, but much larger in the next chapter. The militia of this tribe scarcely reached to 60,000; but they are said to be mighty men of valour, Ch1 7:7, Ch1 7:9, Ch1 7:11. Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf, Gen 49:27. It was the honour of this tribe that it produced Saul the first king, and more its honour that it adhered to the rightful kings of the house of David when the other tribes revolted. Here is mention (Ch1 7:12) of Hushim the sons of Aher. The sons of Dan are said to be Hushim (Gen 46:23), and therefore some read Aher appellatively, Hushim - the sons of another (that is, another of Jacob's sons) or the sons of a stranger, which Israelites should not be, but such the Danites were when they set up Micah's graven and molten image among them.

III. Of the tribe of Naphtali, Ch1 7:13. The first fathers only of that tribe are named, the very same that we shall find, Gen 46:24, only that Shillem there is Shallum here. None of their descendents are named, perhaps because their genealogies were lost.

IV. Of the tribe of Manasseh, that part of it which was seated within Jordan; for of the other part we had some account before, Ch1 5:23, etc. Of this tribe observe, 1. That one of them married an Aramitess, that is, a Syrian, Ch1 7:14. This was during their bondage in Egypt, so early did they begin to mingle with the nations. 2. That, though the father married a Syrian, Machir, the son of that marriage, perhaps seeing the inconvenience of it in his father's house, took to wife a daughter of Benjamin, Ch1 7:15. It is good for the children to take warning by their father's mistakes and not stumble at the same stone. 3. Here is mention of Bedan (Ch1 7:17), who perhaps is the same with that Bedan who is mentioned as one of Israel's deliverers, Sa1 12:11. Jair perhaps, who was of Manasseh (Jdg 10:3), was the man.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.