- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Luke20
Jesus's Authority Challenged
Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers
Tribute to Caesar
The Sadducees and the Resurrection
Whose Son is the Christ?
Warning Against the Scribes
Study Notes for Luke 20
Verse 1
This scene occurs during the final week of Jesus's ministry in Jerusalem. The chief priests and scribes confront Jesus because his public teaching and actions (like cleansing the Temple) usurped their established religious authority.
Verse 2
The core question is one of *exousia* (authority). The leaders sought a legal or political basis for Jesus’s actions, aiming to force him to claim either divine or revolutionary power, thereby providing grounds for arrest.
Verse 4
Jesus employs a brilliant counter-question, putting the leaders in an impossible dilemma. John the Baptist, whom the leaders rejected, directly testified to Jesus’s authority.
Verse 5
The leaders’ internal debate reveals their motivation: they are not seeking truth, but calculating the political and social risks of their answer.
Verse 9
This parable is a clear allegory drawn from Isaiah 5:1–7, where the vineyard represents Israel. Jesus is speaking directly to the crowd, but the message is aimed squarely at the chief priests and scribes.
Verse 13
The term 'beloved son' distinguishes Jesus from the previous messengers (the prophets). It asserts his unique, divine identity as the heir, whose arrival should have commanded reverence.
Verse 14
The vinedressers' motivation is greed and usurpation of the inheritance. This represents the Jewish leaders’ desire to maintain control over Israel, even if it meant rejecting the Son of God.
Verse 16
The destruction of the tenants and the granting of the vineyard to 'others' is a prophecy of judgment against the unfaithful leaders and the eventual transfer of covenant privileges to the Church (including believing Gentiles).
Verse 17
Jesus quotes Psalm 118:22, identifying himself as the 'stone which the builders rejected.' This emphasizes that his rejection and subsequent exaltation were foretold in Scripture.
Verse 18
This verse warns of two levels of judgment: stumbling over the stone (rejecting Christ) results in brokenness, while the stone falling on someone (final judgment) results in complete destruction.
Verse 19
The religious authorities understood the parable perfectly, recognizing that Jesus accused them of rejecting God’s messengers and planning to murder the Son.
Verse 20
The leaders sent spies who pretended to be morally upright or unbiased. Their goal was to force Jesus into making a treasonous statement against Rome that could be used by the Governor (Pilate).
Verse 22
The question concerns the *tributum capitis* (poll tax), a deeply resented tax paid directly to Rome. A 'yes' answer would alienate the Jewish populace; a 'no' answer was sedition.
Verse 25
Jesus resolves the dilemma by establishing two distinct realms of obligation. Since the coin bears Caesar’s image, it belongs to him; since humanity bears God’s image (Genesis 1:27), ultimate loyalty belongs to God.
Verse 27
The Sadducees were an aristocratic sect who accepted only the Pentateuch (the Law of Moses) and denied doctrines like the resurrection, angels, and spirits.
Verse 28
Their question is based on the law of levirate marriage (Deuteronomy 25:5), which required a brother to marry his deceased brother’s widow to maintain the family line. They use this extreme hypothetical case to ridicule the idea of resurrection.
Verse 34
Jesus corrects their fundamental error: they projected the conditions of the temporary, physical world onto the eternal, resurrected world.
Verse 36
In the resurrection, believers will share an immortal, non-procreative existence, likened to the angels. The purpose of marriage (procreation and continuity) ceases when death is overcome.
Verse 37
Jesus proves the resurrection using the Sadducees’ own accepted text (Exodus 3:6). By referring to the patriarchs in the present tense ('God of Abraham...'), Moses shows that they are not annihilated but are presently alive with God.
Verse 41
Jesus now shifts from defense to offense, challenging the leaders’ understanding of the Messiah's identity, which they typically limited to a political descendant of David.
Verse 42
Jesus quotes Psalm 110:1, a highly recognized Messianic psalm. The question hinges on how David could call his own descendant 'Lord' (Gr. *Kyrios*).
Verse 44
The question forces the leaders to confront the dual nature of the Messiah: he must be both a human descendant of David ('son') and a divine sovereign ('Lord').
Verse 45
Having silenced his antagonists, Jesus gives a public warning to the disciples and the crowd regarding the hypocrisy of the religious elites.
Verse 46
Jesus condemns the scribes for seeking outward status (long robes, greetings) and honorific titles, prioritizing public recognition over genuine humility and service.
Verse 47
To 'devour widows’ houses' means exploiting the vulnerable through legal or financial manipulation, while masking this injustice with ostentatious displays of 'long prayers.' This hypocrisy merits 'greater damnation' (severer judgment).