Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Is it lawful for us to give tribute unto Caesar, or no?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Is it lawful G1832 for us G2254 to give G1325 tribute G5411 unto Caesar G2541, or G2228 no G3756?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Does Torah permit us to pay taxes to the Roman Emperor or not?”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Is it lawful for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not?”
Ask
American Standard Version
Is it lawful for us to give tribute unto Cæsar, or not?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Is it lawful for us to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Is it lawfull for vs to giue Cesar tribute or no?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Is it lawful to us to give tribute to Caesar or not?'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,802 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 20:22 captures a pivotal moment when religious leaders, seeking to ensnare Jesus, pose a loaded question about the legality of paying tribute to Caesar. This seemingly simple query was a meticulously crafted trap, designed to force Jesus into a position where He would either alienate the Jewish populace by endorsing Roman rule or incur the wrath of Roman authorities by advocating rebellion. The verse sets the stage for Jesus' profound and divinely wise response, which transcends the immediate political dilemma to articulate a foundational principle concerning the dual allegiances of believers to both earthly governments and the divine kingdom.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is embedded within a series of confrontations between Jesus and the religious authorities in Jerusalem, specifically the chief priests, scribes, and elders, during the Passion Week. Following Jesus' triumphal entry and His cleansing of the temple, these leaders repeatedly challenge His authority and seek to discredit Him. Luke 20:1-8 describes their initial direct challenge, which Jesus deftly parries with a question about John's baptism. Immediately preceding this verse, Jesus has just delivered the Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers (Luke 20:9-19), a parable clearly aimed at the religious leaders, exposing their rejection of God's Son and foreshadowing their ultimate judgment. Angered by this, they send "spies" who feign sincerity to "catch Him in His words" (Luke 20:20), setting the immediate scene for the tribute question.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Judea in the 1st century AD was a Roman province, directly governed by Rome. The "tribute" (Latin: tributum capitis, a poll tax) was an annual tax levied on all adult subjects, a constant reminder of Roman subjugation. This tax was deeply resented by the Jewish people for several reasons: it symbolized their loss of national sovereignty; the coin used for payment, typically a denarius, often bore the image of Emperor Tiberius and blasphemous inscriptions like "Tiberius Caesar, son of the divine Augustus," which was idolatrous to monotheistic Jews; and it was vehemently opposed by nationalist groups like the Zealots, who believed God alone was Israel's king. The question in Luke 20:22 was thus a political and religious minefield, designed to force Jesus into either sedition against Rome or apostasy against Jewish law and popular sentiment.
  • Key Themes: The question in Luke 20:22 serves as a critical juncture for several overarching themes in Luke's Gospel and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the Wisdom and Authority of Jesus, showcasing His unparalleled ability to navigate complex ethical and political dilemmas with divine insight, consistently confounding His adversaries. Secondly, it introduces the profound theme of Divine vs. Earthly Authority, laying the groundwork for Jesus' subsequent teaching on rendering to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's (Luke 20:25). This principle establishes a framework for understanding the believer's dual citizenship and responsibilities. Lastly, the passage touches upon the practical challenge of Navigating Societal Obligations for believers, particularly how to interact with and submit to governing authorities, even those that may be pagan or oppressive, a theme further developed in later New Testament epistles like Romans 13.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • lawful (Greek, éxesti', G1832): This word, derived from a root suggesting "being out in public" or "permissible," denotes what is proper, right, or allowed, particularly from a legal or moral standpoint. In this context, the questioners are probing the legality and religious permissibility of paying the Roman poll tax, framing it as a matter of divine law versus human decree. Their intent is to force Jesus to declare whether it is "right" in God's eyes to submit to a pagan ruler's demand for tribute.
  • give (Greek, dídōmi', G1325): This verb has a broad application, meaning "to give," "bestow," or "deliver." Here, it refers to the act of handing over the tribute money. The choice of this verb emphasizes the active participation required in paying the tax, making the question not just about the legality of the tax itself, but about the act of giving it, which could be interpreted as an acknowledgment of Caesar's sovereignty over God's.
  • tribute (Greek, phóros', G5411): This term specifically refers to a "load borne," or a tax, particularly an individual assessment or poll tax levied by a superior power. It distinguishes itself from other forms of taxes or customs duties. The use of phoros highlights that the question is not about general economic transactions but about a direct, personal tax imposed by the Roman Empire, which carried significant symbolic weight regarding subjugation and allegiance.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Is it lawful for us": This opening phrase immediately establishes the core of the question as a matter of legality and moral permissibility. The "us" refers to the Jewish people, implying a collective religious and national identity. The questioners are not asking about Roman law, but about what is "lawful" according to Jewish religious tradition and God's law, given the Roman occupation and the idolatrous nature of the tax.
  • "to give tribute unto Caesar": This clause specifies the action and the recipient. "To give tribute" refers to the act of paying the Roman poll tax, a direct acknowledgment of Roman authority. "Unto Caesar" identifies the ultimate recipient and symbol of that authority, the Roman Emperor. This phrase crystallizes the dilemma: does one's allegiance to God permit or forbid the payment of a tax to a pagan ruler who claims divine status?
  • "or no?": This simple disjunctive phrase frames the question as a binary choice, demanding a direct "yes" or "no" answer. It reveals the trap's design, as either answer would have severe consequences for Jesus. A "yes" would alienate Him from the nationalist Jews who opposed Roman rule, while a "no" would be construed as sedition against the Roman Empire, providing grounds for His arrest.

Literary Devices

Luke 20:22 masterfully employs several literary devices. The most prominent is the Dilemma, a classic rhetorical trap where any direct answer leads to an undesirable outcome. The questioners present Jesus with a no-win situation, hoping to force Him into either political rebellion or religious compromise. This creates dramatic Irony, as those feigning sincerity ("We know that thou sayest and teachest rightly...") are, in fact, acting as spies with malicious intent. The question itself functions as a Rhetorical Question in the sense that it is not asked for genuine information but to expose and condemn. Furthermore, the scene is a powerful example of Foreshadowing, as the very issue of Jesus' kingship and His relationship to Roman authority will ultimately lead to His crucifixion under the charge of sedition.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The question in Luke 20:22, though a trap, serves as a profound theological touchstone regarding the believer's relationship with both divine and temporal authorities. It compels a consideration of where ultimate allegiance lies and how one navigates the often-complex demands of earthly governments while maintaining fidelity to God's kingdom. Jesus' subsequent answer (Luke 20:25) establishes the foundational principle that while believers have legitimate obligations to governing authorities (such as paying taxes), their ultimate and unreserved allegiance belongs to God. This dual citizenship requires discerning wisdom, recognizing that earthly rulers derive their authority, however imperfectly, from God's sovereign design, yet their claims are always subordinate to His. This passage thus provides a framework for Christian engagement with the state, balancing submission with the supreme call to honor God.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The question posed to Jesus in Luke 20:22, though ancient, resonates powerfully with believers today, prompting us to reflect on our own allegiances and responsibilities in a complex world. We are often faced with situations where the demands of earthly systems seem to conflict with our spiritual convictions, whether concerning taxation, political engagement, or social justice. This verse reminds us that true wisdom, exemplified by Christ, lies not in choosing one extreme over another, but in discerning God's overarching sovereignty. It challenges us to consider how we can honor governing authorities (as ordained by God for order) while simultaneously ensuring that our ultimate devotion and obedience are reserved for God alone. Our lives should bear witness to a kingdom that is "not of this world" (John 18:36), yet we are called to live faithfully within this world, demonstrating Christ's wisdom and love in all our interactions, even with systems that may seem flawed or oppressive.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I balance my civic duties (like paying taxes) with my ultimate allegiance to God's kingdom?
  • In what ways might I be tempted to compromise my faith for political expediency or social acceptance?
  • How can I seek divine wisdom when faced with complex ethical or political dilemmas in my own life?
  • What does "rendering to God what is God's" truly mean in my daily walk?

FAQ

Who posed this question to Jesus, and what was their motive?

Answer: The question was posed by "spies" sent by the chief priests and scribes, as explicitly stated in Luke 20:20. These individuals feigned sincerity, pretending to be righteous and genuinely seeking an answer. Their true motive, however, was malicious: they sought to "catch Him in His words, that they might deliver Him unto the power and authority of the governor." They aimed to trap Jesus, either by forcing Him to advocate rebellion against Roman rule (which would lead to His arrest by Roman authorities) or by having Him endorse Roman taxation (which would alienate Him from the Jewish populace who deeply resented Roman occupation and its associated taxes).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 20:22, while presenting a specific historical and political dilemma, ultimately points to the supreme authority and wisdom of Christ. The question about tribute to Caesar foreshadows the ultimate confrontation between earthly power and divine sovereignty that culminates in Jesus' trial and crucifixion. When Pilate later asks Jesus if He is "the King of the Jews" (John 18:33), Jesus' response in John 18:36 ("My kingdom is not of this world") echoes the principle He lays down regarding Caesar's tribute. Jesus, as the true King, demonstrates that His kingdom transcends and ultimately subsumes all earthly powers. His willingness to submit to earthly authorities, even unto death on a Roman cross, was not an endorsement of their ultimate power but a demonstration of His divine mission to redeem humanity. Through His death and resurrection, He established a new covenant and a spiritual kingdom, inviting all to render their lives, their hearts, and their ultimate allegiance to Him, the one who paid the ultimate tribute for our salvation and reigns eternally as King of kings and Lord of lords.

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 20 verses 20–26

We have here Christ's evading a snare which his enemies laid for him, by proposing a question to him about tribute. We had this passage before, both in Matthew and Mark. Here is,

I. The mischief designed him, and that is more fully related here than before. The plot was to deliver him unto the power and authority of the governor, Luk 20:20. They could not themselves put him to death by course of law, nor otherwise than by a popular tumult, which they could not depend upon; and, since they could not be his judges, they would willingly condescend to be his prosecutors and accusers, and would themselves inform against him. They hoped to gain their point, if they could but incense the governor against him. Note, It has been the common artifice of persecuting church-rulers to make the secular powers the tools of their malice, and oblige the kings of the earth to do their drudgery, who, if they had not been instigated, would have let their neighbours live quietly by them, as Pilate did Christ till the chief priests and the scribes presented Christ to him. But thus Christ's word must be fulfilled by their cursed politics, that he should be delivered into the hands of the Gentiles.

II. The persons they employed. Matthew and Mark told us that they were disciples of the Pharisees, with some Herodians. Here it is added, They were spies, who should feign themselves just men. Note, It is no new thing for bad men to feign themselves just men, and to cover the most wicked projects with the most specious and plausible pretences. The devil can transform himself into an angel of light, and a Pharisee appear in the garb, and speak the language, of a disciple of Christ. A spy must go in disguise. These spies must take on them to have a value for Christ's judgment, and to depend upon it as an oracle, and therefore must desire his advice in a case of conscience. Note, Ministers are concerned to stand upon their guard against some that feign themselves to be just men, and to be wise as serpents when they are in the midst of a generation of vipers and scorpions.

III. The question they proposed, with which they hoped to ensnare him. 1. Their preface is very courtly: Master, we know that thou sayest and teachest rightly, Luk 20:21. Thus they thought to flatter him into an incautious freedom and openness with them, and so to gain their point. They that are proud, and love to be commended, will be brought to do any thing for those that will but flatter them, and speak kindly to them; but they were much mistaken who thought thus to impose upon the humble Jesus. He was not pleased with the testimony of such hypocrites, nor thought himself honoured by it. It is true that he accepts not the person of any, but it is as true that he knows the hearts of all, and knew theirs, and the seven abominations that were there, though they spoke fair. It was certain that he taught the way of God truly; but he knew that they were unworthy to be taught by him, who came to take hold of his words, not to be taken hold of by them. 2. Their case is very nice: "Is it lawful for us" (this is added here in Luke) "to give tribute to Caesar - for us Jews, us the free-born seed of Abraham, us that pay the Lord's tribute, may give tribute to Caesar?" Their pride and covetousness made them loth to pay taxes, and then they would have it a question whether it was lawful or no. Now if Christ should say that it was lawful the people would take it ill, for they expected that he who set up to be the Messiah should in the first place free them from the Roman yoke, and stand by them in denying tribute to Caesar. But if he should say that it was not lawful, as they expected he would (for if he had not been of that mind they thought he could not have been so much the darling of the people as he was), then they should have something to accuse him of to the governor, which was what they wanted.

IV. His evading the snare which they laid for him: He perceived their craftiness, Luk 20:23. Note, Those that are most crafty in their designs against Christ and his gospel cannot with all their art conceal them from his cognizance. He can see through the most politic disguises, and so break through the most dangerous snare; for surely in vain is the net spread in the sight of any bird. He did not give them a direct answer, but reproved them for offering to impose upon him - Why tempt ye me? and called for a piece of money, current money with the merchants - Show me a penny; and asked them whose money it was, whose stamp it bore, who coined it. They owned, "It is Caesar's money." "Why them," saith Christ, "you should first have asked whether it was lawful to pay and receive Caesar's money among yourselves, and to admit that to be the instrument of your commerce. But, having granted this by a common consent, you are concluded by your own act, and, no doubt, you ought to give tribute to him who furnished you with this convenience for your trade, protects you in it, and lends you the sanction of his authority for the value of your money. You must therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's. In civil things you ought to submit to the civil powers, and so, if Caesar protects you in your civil rights by laws and the administration of justice, you ought to pay him tribute; but in sacred things God only is your King. You are not bound to be of Caesar's religion; you must render to God the things that are God's, must worship and adore him only, and not any golden image that Caesar sets up;" and we must worship and adore him in such way as he had appointed, and not according to the inventions of Caesar. It is God only that has authority to say My son, give me thy heart.

V. The confusion they were hereby put into, Luk 20:26. 1. The snare is broken; They could not take hold of his words before the people. They could not fasten upon any thing wherewith to incense either the governor or the people against him. 2. Christ is honoured; even the wrath of man is made to praise him. They marvelled at his answer, it was so discreet and unexceptionable, and such an evidence of that wisdom and sincerity which make the face to shine. 3. Their mouths are stopped; they held their peace. They had nothing to object, and durst ask him nothing else, lest he should shame and expose them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–26. Public domain.
Copy as
Justin MartyrAD 165
The First Apology, Chapter XVII
And everywhere we, more readily than all men, endeavour to pay to those appointed by you the taxes both ordinary and extraordinary, as we have been taught by Him; for at that time some came to Him and asked Him, if one ought to pay tribute to Caesar; and He answered, "Tell Me, whose image does the coin bear?" And they said, "Caesar's." And again He answered them, "Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." Whence to God alone we render worship, but in other things we gladly serve you, acknowledging you as kings and rulers of men, and praying that with your kingly power you be found to possess also sound judgment. But if you pay no regard to our prayers and frank explanations, we shall suffer no loss, since we believe (or rather, indeed, are persuaded) that every man will suffer punishment in eternal fire according to the merit of his deed, and will render account according to the power he has received from God, as Christ intimated when He said, "To whom God has given more, of him shall more be required."
Titus of Bostra (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 378
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
As if He said, With your words ye tempt me, obey me in works. Ye have indeed Cæsar's image, ye have undertaken his offices, to him therefore give tribute, to God fear. For God requireth not money, but faith.
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Our Lord here teaches us, how cautious we ought to be in our answers to heretics or Jews; as He has said elsewhere, Be ye wise as serpents (Mat. 10:16).

Be unwilling then, if thou wouldest not offend Cæsar, to possess worldly goods. And thou rightly teachest, first to render the things which be Cæsar's. For no one can be the Lord's unless he has first renounced the world. Oh most galling chain! To promise to God, and pay not. Far greater is the contract of faith than that of money.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 9.35
When they questioned him about the penny, he asks about the image, because there is one image of God and another image of the world. The apostle also admonishes us, “As we have borne the image of the earthly, let us bear also the image of the heavenly.” Christ does not have the image of Caesar, because he is the image of God. Peter does not have the image of Caesar, because he said, “We have left all things, and have followed you.” The image of Caesar is not found in James and John, because they are the Sons of Thunder. It is found in the sea, where there are dragons with crushed heads upon the water. The large dragon itself, with its head broken, is given there as food to the Ethiopian people. If he did not have the image of Caesar, why did he pay the tax? He did not give from his own but gave back to the world what was of the world. If you would not be indebted to Caesar, do not possess what belongs to the world. You have wealth; therefore you are indebted to Caesar. If you want to owe nothing to an earthly king, leave all that you have and follow Christ.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
SERMON 308A.7
These same enemies saw the miracles of the Lord, and they said, "Tell us by what authority you are doing these things." They questioned him with hostile intentions, so that if he admitted what his authority was, they could hold him as guilty of blaspheming. He acted in the same way as over the coin, when they wanted to accuse him falsely. If he said, "Let tribute be paid to Caesar," it would be as though he had cursed the people of the Jews, making them subject and tributary to a foreign power. If he had said, "It should not be paid," they could trump up a charge against him before Caesar's friends and administrators that he was forbidding its payment. He, though, said, "Show me a coin. Whose image and inscription does it carry?" They answered, "Caesar's." He said, "So pay to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's." That amounts to saying, "If Caesar can require his image in a coin, cannot God require his image in a human being?"
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 135
What do they say? "Teacher, we know that you speak and teach rightly, nor do you accept persons but teach the way of God in truth. Is it lawful for us to give tribute to Caesar, or not?" O what polluted dishonesty! The God of all certainly wanted Israel to be exempt from human rule. They trampled under foot the divine laws and totally despised the commandment given to them. They committed themselves to their own devices. They therefore fell under the hand of those who at that time ruled over them. They also imposed on them tribute, tax and the yoke of an unaccustomed slavery. The prophet Jeremiah also lamented over Jerusalem as though it had already suffered this fate, saying, "How lonely sits the city that was full of people! How like a widow has she become, she that was great among the nations! She who was a princess among the cities has become a vassal."It therefore says that their object was to deliver him to the authority of the governor, because they expected that they would hear him say, certainly and without doubt, that it was not lawful to give tribute to Caesar.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
And so by seeking to slay Him, they proved the truth of what He had said in the parable. For He Himself is the Heir, whose unjust death He said was to be punished. They are the wicked husbandmen who sought to kill the Son of God. This also is daily committed in the Church when any one, only in name a brother, is ashamed or afraid, because of the many good men with whom he lives, to break into that unity of the Church's faith and peace which he abhors. And because the chief priests sought to lay hold of our Lord but could not by themselves, they tried to accomplish it by the hands of the governor; as it follows, And they watched him, &c.

This smooth and artful question was to entice the answerer to say that he fears God rather than Cæsar, for it follows, Neither acceptest thou the person of any, but teachest the way of God truly. This they say, to entice Him to tell them that they ought not to pay tribute, in order that the servants of the guard, (who according to the other Evangelists are said to have been present,) might immediately upon hearing it seize Him as the leader of a sedition against the Romans. And so they proceed to ask, Is it lawful to give tribute to Cæsar, or not? For there was a great division among the people, some saying that for the sake of security and quiet, seeing that the Romans fought for all, they ought to pay tribute; while the Pharisees, on the contrary, declared, that the people of God who gave tithes and first fruits, ought not to be subject to the law of man.

Let those who impute the question of our Saviour to ignorance, learn from this place that Jesus was well able to know whose image was on the money; but He asks the question, that He might give a fitting answer to their words; for it follows, They answered and said, Cæsar's. We must not suppose Augustus is thereby meant, but Tiberius, for all the Roman kings were called Cæsar, from the first Caius Cæsar. But from their answer our Lord easily solves the question, for it follows, And he said unto them, Render unto Cæsar the things which be Cœsar's, and unto God the things which be God's.

Render also to God the things which be God's, that is to say, tithes, first fruits, offerings, and sacrifices.

Now they who ought rather to have believed such great wisdom, marvelled that in all their cunning they had found no opportunity of catching Him. As it follows, And they could not take hold of his words before the people: and they marvelled at his answer, and held their peace.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
They laid snares for our Lord, but got their own feet entangled in them. Listen to their cunning, And they asked Him, saying, Master, we know that thou sayest and teachest rightly.

Therefore it was intended, in case He said they ought to give tribute to Cæsar, that He should be accused by the people, as placing the nation under the yoke of slavery, but if He forbade them to pay the tax, that they should denounce Him as a stirrer up of divisions to the governor. But He escapes their snares, as it follows, Perceiving their craftiness, he said unto them, Why tempt ye me? show me a penny. Whose image and superscription has it?

And observe that He said not, give, but return. For it is a debt. Thy prince protects thee from enemies, renders thy life tranquil. Surely then thou art bound to pay him tribute. Nay, this very piece of money which thou bringest thou hast from him. Return then to the king the king's money. God also has given thee understanding and reason, make then a return of these to Him, that thou mayest not be compared to the beasts, but in all things mayest walk wisely.

This was their main object, to rebuke Him before the people, which they were unable to do because of the wonderful wisdom of His answer.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 20:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.