Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ Then began he to speak to the people this parable; A certain man planted a vineyard, and let it forth to husbandmen, and went into a far country for a long time.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then G1161 began he G756 to speak G3004 to G4314 the people G2992 this G5026 parable G3850; A certain G5100 man G444 planted G5452 a vineyard G290, and G2532 let G1554 it G846 forth G1554 to husbandmen G1092, and G2532 went into a far country G589 for a long G2425 time G5550.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Next Yeshua told the people this parable: “A man planted a vineyard, rented it to tenant-farmers and went away for a long time.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then He proceeded to tell the people this parable: “A man planted a vineyard, rented it out to some tenants, and went away for a long time.
Ask
American Standard Version
And he began to speak unto the people this parable: A man planted a vineyard, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into another country for a long time.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He began to tell the people this parable. “A man planted a vineyard, and rented it out to some farmers, and went into another country for a long time.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then began he to speake to ye people this parable, A certaine man planted a vineyarde, and let it forth to husbandmen: and went into a strange countrey, for a great time.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And he began to speak unto the people this simile: `A certain man planted a vineyard, and gave it out to husbandmen, and went abroad for a long time,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,789 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 20:9 introduces the profound Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers, a narrative delivered by Jesus to the people, yet pointedly aimed at the religious leaders of His day. This verse sets the stage by describing a landowner who meticulously plants a vineyard, entrusts its care to husbandmen, and then departs for a significant period, establishing the foundational elements of the allegory concerning God's relationship with Israel and its leadership.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This parable immediately follows a direct challenge to Jesus' authority by the chief priests, scribes, and elders in Luke 20:1-8. Instead of answering their question directly, Jesus responds with this allegorical story, which subtly yet powerfully addresses their spiritual blindness, their rejection of God's previous messengers (the prophets), and their impending rejection of His ultimate messenger—Himself. The parable thus serves as both a defense of His authority and a prophetic warning to those who opposed Him. Parallel accounts are found in Matthew 21:33-46 and Mark 12:1-12, underscoring its critical importance in the Synoptic Gospels' portrayal of Jesus' final teachings in Jerusalem.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: Vineyards were a common and vital part of ancient Israel's agricultural economy and cultural landscape. The imagery of a vineyard was deeply ingrained in the Jewish consciousness, frequently used in the Old Testament as a symbol of Israel itself (e.g., Isaiah 5:1-7; Psalm 80:8-16). Landowners often leased out their vineyards to tenants (husbandmen) who would cultivate the land and pay a portion of the produce as rent. It was customary for the owner to travel, sometimes for extended periods, leaving the management to the tenants. This practice provides a realistic backdrop for Jesus' parable, making it immediately relatable to His audience while simultaneously layering it with profound theological meaning.

  • Key Themes: This opening verse introduces several crucial themes that are developed throughout the parable. The primary theme is God's Ownership and Provision, represented by the "certain man" who plants and owns the vineyard. This highlights that God is the sovereign Lord over His people and His creation, generously providing all that is needed for fruitfulness, as seen in Psalm 24:1. Another key theme is Stewardship and Accountability, embodied by the "husbandmen" who are entrusted with the vineyard's care. These figures represent the religious leaders of Israel who were given the responsibility to guide and nurture God's people, and who would ultimately be held accountable for their faithfulness, a concept echoed in 1 Corinthians 4:2. Finally, the owner's departure "for a long time" subtly introduces the theme of Divine Patience and Long-suffering, indicating God's forbearance with His people and their leaders throughout history, providing ample opportunity for repentance and fruit-bearing, as illustrated in 2 Peter 3:9.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • parable (Greek, parabolḗ', G3850): Meaning "a similitude ('parable'), i.e. (symbolic) fictitious narrative (of common life conveying a moral), apothegm or adage." Jesus' use of parabolḗ here signals that the following story is not a literal event but a symbolic narrative designed to convey a deeper spiritual truth, often challenging listeners to discern its allegorical meaning.
  • husbandmen (Greek, geōrgós', G1092): Meaning "a land-worker, i.e. farmer." The term geōrgós specifically denotes those who are responsible for tilling the ground and cultivating its produce. In this parable, these individuals are not just generic farmers but represent those entrusted with the care and spiritual oversight of God's "vineyard," Israel, highlighting their direct responsibility for its fruitfulness.
  • went into a far country (Greek, apodēméō', G589): Meaning "to go abroad, i.e. visit a foreign land." This verb describes the owner's departure, signifying a period of absence. In the allegorical sense, this represents God's perceived "absence" or patience, allowing human agents (the religious leaders) to exercise their stewardship and demonstrate their faithfulness over a significant period.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then began he to speak to the people this parable;": This opening phrase indicates a shift in Jesus' teaching method, moving from direct discourse and answering questions to employing a narrative form. The phrase "to the people" suggests a broad audience, yet the subsequent content of the parable strongly implies a specific target: the religious leaders who had just challenged Him. The introduction of "this parable" immediately cues the listeners that a symbolic story with a hidden meaning is about to unfold.
  • "A certain man planted a vineyard,": This clause introduces the central figure and setting of the parable. The "certain man" universally represents God, the divine Owner and Initiator. The act of "planting a vineyard" signifies God's deliberate and careful establishment of Israel as His chosen people, providing all necessary resources for their growth and fruitfulness, much like a meticulous gardener prepares a fertile plot.
  • "and let it forth to husbandmen,": This describes the delegation of responsibility. The vineyard is not abandoned but entrusted to "husbandmen," who are given the authority and duty to cultivate it. This represents God's entrusting of His people, Israel, to the care and leadership of its religious authorities (priests, scribes, elders), who were expected to manage the spiritual life of the nation and produce righteous fruit.
  • "and went into a far country for a long time.": This final clause details the owner's departure and the duration of his absence. His journey "into a far country" symbolizes God's patience and His allowing a period during which the delegated authorities are to exercise their stewardship. The phrase "for a long time" emphasizes the extended period of divine forbearance, during which the husbandmen were given ample opportunity to fulfill their obligations before the owner's return for an accounting.

Literary Devices

Luke 20:9, as the introduction to the Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers, primarily employs Allegory and Symbolism. The entire narrative functions as an Allegory, where each element of the story (the owner, the vineyard, the husbandmen, the far country, the long time) directly corresponds to a specific spiritual reality. The Symbolism is rich: the "certain man" symbolizes God; the "vineyard" symbolizes Israel, God's chosen people; and the "husbandmen" symbolize the religious leaders of Israel. The act of "planting" symbolizes God's careful establishment and provision for His people, while the owner going "into a far country for a long time" symbolizes God's patience and the period of His perceived "absence" during which the leaders are to exercise their stewardship. This layered use of symbolism within the allegorical framework allows Jesus to convey a profound and convicting message in a way that was both culturally relevant and prophetically charged.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 20:9 lays the groundwork for one of Jesus' most significant parables, deeply rooted in Old Testament imagery and prophetic tradition. The "vineyard" motif, in particular, resonates with Isaiah's "Song of the Vineyard" (Isaiah 5:1-7), where Israel is depicted as God's vineyard, expected to yield good fruit but instead producing wild grapes. This verse immediately establishes God's sovereign ownership and generous provision, contrasted with the delegated stewardship of human leaders. The parable, introduced here, serves as a powerful indictment of the unfaithful leadership of Israel, who, instead of nurturing God's people and yielding fruit for Him, would ultimately reject and even kill His messengers, including His own Son. It underscores the profound responsibility of those entrusted with spiritual authority and the severe consequences of failing to meet divine expectations.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This foundational verse of the Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers offers timeless lessons on stewardship, accountability, and divine expectation. While initially aimed at the unfaithful religious leaders of Jesus' day, its principles extend to all believers. We are all, in various capacities, "husbandmen" entrusted with God's "vineyard"—whether it be our spiritual gifts, resources, relationships, or the Gospel message itself. The "certain man" who plants and then departs reminds us that God has generously provided for us and then given us the responsibility to cultivate and produce spiritual fruit in His absence. The "long time" signifies God's patience, but it also implies an eventual return and an accounting. This prompts us to examine our own lives: Are we faithfully stewarding what God has entrusted to us? Are we producing the fruit of righteousness, love, and service, or are we neglecting our duties, or worse, actively resisting God's purposes? This verse calls us to a deeper commitment to faithful stewardship, recognizing that our actions have eternal consequences and that one day we will give an account to the true Owner of the vineyard.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways do I see myself as a "husbandman" entrusted with God's "vineyard" in my own life or community?
  • What "fruit" is God expecting from me in the areas He has entrusted to my care?
  • How does the owner's "long time" away encourage or challenge my understanding of God's patience and eventual return?
  • What specific actions can I take today to be a more faithful steward of God's gifts and opportunities?

FAQ

What is the main purpose of Jesus telling this parable at this specific time?

Answer: Jesus tells this parable immediately after the chief priests, scribes, and elders challenged His authority (Luke 20:1-8). Its main purpose is twofold: first, to subtly but powerfully condemn the unfaithful leadership of Israel, who had consistently rejected God's messengers (the prophets) and were about to reject His ultimate messenger, Jesus Himself. Second, it serves as a prophetic warning of the judgment that would come upon them and the transfer of the "kingdom" to others who would produce its fruit (Matthew 21:43).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 20:9, as the introduction to the Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers, finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in Jesus Himself being the "beloved son" whom the owner sends last, only to be rejected and killed by the wicked husbandmen (Luke 20:13-15). The "certain man" who plants the vineyard is God the Father, and the vineyard is Israel, cultivated and cared for by God. The "husbandmen" represent the religious leaders who, throughout history, consistently rejected God's prophets (the previous servants sent by the owner). Jesus, as the Son, is God's final and supreme messenger, embodying the culmination of God's redemptive plan. His rejection and crucifixion, foreshadowed in this parable, become the very means by which God establishes a new covenant and a new "vineyard"—the Church—which will indeed bear the fruit of the kingdom. Thus, this parable not only condemns the unfaithfulness of past leadership but also powerfully prophesies the atoning work of Christ, whose death, though intended for evil by His enemies, was God's sovereign plan for the salvation of humanity (Acts 2:23). The "cornerstone" rejected by the builders (Luke 20:17) is Christ, who becomes the foundation of God's new spiritual house, fulfilling the prophetic trajectory of this pivotal parable.

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 20 verses 9–19

Christ spoke this parable against those who were resolved not to own his authority, though the evidence of it was ever so full and convincing; and it comes very seasonably to show that by questioning his authority they forfeited their own. Their disowning the lord of their vineyard was a defeasance of their lease of the vineyard, and giving up of all their title.

I. The parable has nothing added here to what we had before in Matthew and Mark. The scope of it is to show that the Jewish nation, by persecuting the prophets, and at length Christ himself, had provoked God to take away from them all their church privileges, and to abandon them to ruin. It teaches us, 1. That those who enjoy the privileges of the visible church are as tenants and farmers that have a vineyard to look after, and rent to pay for it. God, by setting up revealed religion and instituted orders in the world, hath planted a vineyard, which he lets out to those people among whom his tabernacle is, Luk 20:9. And they have vineyard-work to do, needful and constant work, but pleasant and profitable. Whereas man was, for sin, condemned to till the ground, they that have a place in the church are restored to that which was Adam's work in innocency, to dress the garden, and to keep it; for the church is a paradise, and Christ the tree of life in it. They have also vineyard-fruits to present to the Lord of the vineyard. There are rents to be paid and services to be done, which, though bearing no proportion to the value of the premises, yet must be done and must be paid. 2. That the work of God's ministers is to call upon those who enjoy the privileges of the church to bring forth fruit accordingly. They are God's rent-gatherers, to put the husbandmen in mind of their arrears, or rather to put them in mind that they have a landlord who expects to hear from them, and to receive some acknowledgment of their dependence on him, and obligations to him, Luk 20:10. The Old Testament prophets were sent on this errand to the Jewish church, to demand from them the duty and obedience they owed to God. 3. That it has often been the lot of God's faithful servants to be wretchedly abused by his own tenants; they have been beaten and treated shamefully by those that resolved to send them empty away. They that are resolved not to do their duty to God cannot bear to be called upon to do it. Some of the best men in the world have had the hardest usage from it, for their best services. 4. That God sent his Son into the world to carry on the same work that the prophets were employed in, to gather the fruits of the vineyard for God; and one would have thought that he would have been reverenced and received. The prophets spoke as servants, Thus saith the Lord; but Christ as a Son, among his own, Verily, I say unto you. Putting such an honour as this upon them, to send him, one would have thought, should have won upon them. 5. That those who reject Christ's ministers would reject Christ himself if he should come to them; for it has been tried, and found that the persecutors and murderers of his servants the prophets were the persecutors and murderers of himself. They said, This is the heir, come let us kill him. When they slew the servants, there were other servants sent. "But, if we can but be the death of the son, there is never another son to be sent, and then we shall be no longer molested with these demands; we may have a quiet possession of the vineyard for ourselves." The scribes and Pharisees promised themselves that, if they could but get Christ out of the way, they should for ever ride masters in the Jewish church; and therefore they took the bold step, they cast him out of the vineyard, and killed him. 6. That the putting of Christ to death filled up the measure of the Jewish iniquity, and brought upon them ruin without remedy. No other could be expected than that God should destroy those wicked husbandmen. They began in not paying their rent, but then proceeded to beat and kill the servants, and at length their young Master himself. Note, Those that live in the neglect of their duty to God know not what degrees of sin and destruction they are running themselves into.

II. To the application of the parable is added here, which we had not before, their deprecation of the doom included in it (Luk 20:16): When they heart it, they said, God forbid, Mē genoito - Let not this be done, so it should be read. Though they could not but own that for such a sin such a punishment was just, and what might be expected, yet they could not bear to hear of it. Note, It is an instance of the folly and stupidity of sinners that they proceed and persevere in their sinful ways though at the same time they have a foresight and dread of the destruction that is at the end of those ways. And see what a cheat they put themselves, to think to avoid it by a cold God forbid, when they do nothing towards the preventing of it; but will this make the threatening of no effect? No, they shall know whose word shall stand, God's or theirs. Now observe what Christ said, in answer to this childish deprecation of their ruin. 1. He beheld them. This is taken notice of only by this evangelist, Luk 20:17. He looked upon them with pity and compassion, grieved to see them cheat themselves thus to their own ruin. He beheld them, to see if they would blush at their own folly, or if he could discern in their countenances any indication of relenting. 2. He referred them to the scripture: "What is this then that is written? How can you escape the judgment of God, when you cannot prevent the exaltation of him whom you despise and reject? The word of God hath said it, that the stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner." The Lord Jesus will be exalted to the Father's right hand. He has all judgment and all power committed to him; he is the corner-stone and top-stone of the church, and, if so, his enemies can expect no other than to be destroyed. Even those that slight him, that stumble at him, and are offended in him, shall be broken - it will be their ruin; but as to those that not only reject him, but hate and persecute him, as the Jews did, he will fall upon them and crush them to pieces - will grind them to powder. The condemnation of spiteful persecutors will be much sorer than that of careless unbelievers.

Lastly, We are told how the chief priests and scribes were exasperated by this parable (Luk 20:19): They perceived that he had spoken this parable against them; and so he had. A guilty conscience needs no accuser; but they, instead of yielding to the convictions of conscience, fell into a rage at him who awakened that sleeping lion in their bosoms, and sought to lay hands on him. Their corruptions rebelled against their convictions, and got the victory. And it was not because they had any fear of God or of his wrath before their eyes, but only because they feared the people, that they did not now fly in his face, and take him by the throat. They were just ready to make his words good: This is the heir, come let us kill him. Note, When the hearts of the sons of men are fully set in them to do evil, the fairest warnings both of the sin they are about to commit and of the consequences of it make no impression upon them. Christ tells them that instead of kissing the Son of God they would kill him, upon which they should have said, What, is thy servant a dog? But they do, in effect, say this: "And so we will; have at him now." And, though they deprecate the punishment of the sin, in the next breath they are projecting the commission of it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Eusebius of Caesarea (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 339
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The rulers of the Jewish people being now assembled together in the temple, Christ put forth a parable, foretelling by a figure the things they were about to do to Him, and the rejection that was in store for them.

But the parable which Esaias gives denounces the vineyard, whereas our Saviour's parable is not directed against the vineyard, but the cultivators of it; of whom it is added, And he let it out to husbandmen, that is, to the elders of the people, and the chief priests, and the doctors, and all the nobles.

Christ is called a stone on account of His earthly body, cut out without hands, (Dan. 2:34.) as in the vision of Daniel, because of His birth of the Virgin. But the stone is neither of silver nor gold, because He is not any glorious King, but a man lowly and despised, wherefore the builders rejected Him.
Basil of Caesarea (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 379
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
And this happens as it were to men who are condemned, having nothing to answer to the plain evidence of justice. But it is the property of Divine mercy not to inflict punishment in secret, but to foretell it with threatenings, that so it might recall men to repentance; and thus it follows here, He shall come and destroy those husbandmen.
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The vineyard is also our type. For the husbandman is the Almighty Father, the vine is Christ, but we are the branches. (John 15:5.) Rightly are the people of Christ called a vine, either because it carries on its front the sign of the cross, or because its fruits are gathered in the latter time of the year, or because to all men, as to the equal rows of vines, poor as well as rich, servants as well as masters, there is an equal allotment in the Church without distinction of persons. And as the vine is married to the trees, so is the body to the soul. Loving this vineyard, the husbandman is wont to dig it and prune it, lest it grow too luxuriant in the shade of its foliage, and check by unfruitful boastfulness of words the ripening of its natural character. Here must be the vintage of the whole world, for here is the vineyard of the whole world.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 9.23-24
Very many derive various meanings from the word vineyard, but Isaiah clearly stated that the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel. Who else but God founded this vineyard? He leased it and set out to foreign places. The Lord, who is always everywhere, does not journey from place to place, but he is present to those who love him and absent from those who neglect him. He was absent for many seasons, fearing that the foreclosure might seem premature. The more indulgent the generosity, the more inexcusable is the stubbornness.… He thus leased to the Jews his fortified, prepared and beautified vineyard.
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Now many derive different meanings from the name vineyard, but Esaias clearly relates the vineyard of the Lord of Sabaoth to be the house of Israel. (Isa. 5.) This vineyard who else but God planted?

Not that our Lord journeys from place to place, seeing that He is ever present in every place, but that He is more present to those who love Him, while He removes Himself from those who regard Him not. But He was absent for a long time, lest His coming to require His fruit might seem too early. For the more indulgent it is, it renders obstinacy the less excusable.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Now it was not accidentally but part of the purpose of the divine dispensation that Christ came after the prophets. For God does not pursue all things at once, but accommodates Himself to mankind through His great mercy; for if they despised His Son coming after His servants, much less would they have heard Him before. For they who listened not to the inferior commands, how would they have heard the greater?
Augustine of Hippo (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 430
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(de con. Ev. l. ii. c. 70.) Matthew has omitted for brevity's sake what Luke has not, namely, that the parable was spoken not to the rulers only who asked concerning His authority, but also to the people.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 134
The vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the man of Judah, a plant new and beloved. He who planted the vineyard is God, who also went away for a long time. God still fills everything and in no way whatsoever is absent from anything that exists. How, therefore, did the Lord of the vineyard go away for a long time? After they saw him in the shape of fire at his descent on Mount Sinai with Moses, who spoke the law to them as the mediator, he did not again grant to them his presence in a visible way. To use a metaphor taken from human affairs, his relation to them was like one who made a long journey abroad.
Cyril of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 444
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Or God took Himself away from the vineyard for the course of many years, for since the time that He was seen to descend in the likeness of fire upon Mount Sinai, He no longer vouchsafed to them His visible presence; though no change took place, in which He sent not His prophets and righteous men to give warning thereof; as it follows, And at the time of the vintage he sent a servant to the husbandmen, that they should give him of the fruit of the vineyard. (Exod. 19.)
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
He began to tell the people this parable: A man planted a vineyard, and let it out to tenants, and went into another country for a long time. While the Lord was teaching the people and preaching the gospel, the chief priests and the scribes with the elders gathered and questioned, testing in what authority he performed signs. Overcoming them with his wisdom, the Lord proceeded with what he had begun. Indeed, while they were listening, he addressed the people all the more, because they listened to his words more willingly. Introducing a parable, he intended to show them their impiety and to teach that the kingdom of God would be transferred to the nations. Therefore, the man who planted the vineyard is the same one who, according to another parable, hired laborers in his vineyard (Matthew 20). For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel (Isaiah 5). The tenants are the laborers who are said to be hired at the first, third, sixth, and ninth hours to cultivate the vineyard. However, he went into another country, not by changing his location. For where can God be absent from, who says: I fill heaven and earth (Jeremiah 23)? and elsewhere: I am a God who is near, and not far off, says the Lord? But he is said to go away from the vineyard to leave the tenants free will in their working. This is similar to what is said through Isaiah, when the vineyard was let out to tenants: And I looked for it to yield grapes, but it produced wild grapes (Isaiah 5).
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The man then who plants the vineyard is the same who, according to another parable, hired labourers into his vineyard.

But it is rightly written fruit, not increase. For there was no increase in this vineyard. The first servant sent was Moses, who for forty years sought of the husbandmen the fruit of the law which he had given, but he was wroth against them, for they provoked his spirit. Hence it follows, But they beat him, and sent him away empty.

By the other servant is meant David, who was sent after the commandment of the law, that he by the music of his psalmody might stir up the husbandmen to the exercise of good works. But they on the contrary declared, What portion have we in David, neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse. (1 Sam. 20:1.). Hence it follows, And they beat him also, and entreated him shamefully, and sent him away empty. (1 Kings 12:16.) But He does not stop here, for it follows, And again he sent a third: whereby we must understand the company of prophets who constantly visited the people with their testimony. But which of the Prophets did they not persecute; as it follows, And they wounded him also, and cast him out. Now these three successions of servants, our Lord elsewhere shows to comprehend under a figure all the teachers under the law, when He says, For all those things must be fulfilled which were written in the law of Moses, and the Prophets, and the Psalms, concerning me.

But our Lord most clearly proves that the Jewish rulers crucified the Son of God not from ignorance but for envy. For they knew it was He to whom it was said, I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. (Ps. 2:8.) And they cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. (Heb. 13:12.) Because Jesus, that He might sanctify the people by His blood, suffered without the gate.

Or was He cast out of the vineyard and slain, because He was first driven out of the hearts of the unbelievers, and then fastened to the cross?

As if He said, How shall the prophecy be fulfilled, except that Christ, being rejected and slain by you, is to be preached to the Gentiles, who will believe on Him, that as the corner stone He may thus from both nations build up one temple to Himself?

Or else, He who is a sinner, yet believes on Christ, falls indeed upon the stone and is shaken, for he is preserved by penitence unto salvation. But upon whomsoever it shall fall, that is, upon whom the stone itself has come down because he denied it, it shall grind him to powder, so that not even a broken piece of a vessel shall be left, in which may be drunk a little water. Or, He means by those who fall upon Him, such as only despise Him, and therefore do not yet utterly perish, but are shaken violently so that they cannot walk upright. But upon whom it falls, upon them shall He come in judgment with everlasting punishment, therefore shall it grind them to powder, that they may be as the dust which the wind scatters from the face of the earth. (Ps. 1:4.)

(in Marc. 12.) Or understanding it morally; to every one of the faithful is let out a vineyard to cultivate, in that the mystery of baptism is entrusted to him to work out. One servant is sent, a second and a third, when the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets are read. But the servant who is sent is said to be treated despitefully or beaten, when the word heard is despised or blasphemed. The heir who is sent that man kills as far as he can, who by sin tramples under foot the Son of God. (Heb. 6:6.) The wicked husbandman being destroyed, the vineyard is given to another, when with the gift of grace, which the proud man spurned, the humble are enriched.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Or each one of the people is the vineyard, each likewise is the husbandman, for every one of us takes care of himself. Having committed then the vineyard to the husbandmen, he went away, that is, he left them to the guidance of their own judgment. Hence it follows, And went into a far country for a long time.

He says of the fruit of the vineyard, because not the whole fruit, but part only, He wished to receive. For what does God gain from us, but His own knowledge, which is also our profit.

After the prophets then had suffered all these things, the Son is delegated; for it follows, Then said the Lord of the vineyard, What shall I do? That the Lord of the vineyard speaks doubtingly, arises not from ignorance, for what is there that the Lord knows not? but He is said to hesitate, that the free will of man may be preserved.

Now He said this, not as ignorant that they would treat Him worse than they did the prophets, but because the Son ought to be reverenced by them. But if they should still be rebellious and slay Him, this would crown their iniquity. Lest therefore any should say that the Divine Presence has necessarily been the cause of their disobedience, He uses purposely this doubtful mode of speech.

Since we have already assumed the people, not Jerusalem, to be the vineyard, it may perhaps be more properly said that the people indeed slew Him without the vineyard; that is, our Lord suffered without the hands of the people, because in truth the people did not with their own hands inflict death upon Him, but delivered Him up to Pilate and the Gentiles. But some by the vineyard have understood the Scripture, which not believing they slew the Lord. And so without the vineyard, that is, without Scripture, our Lord is said to have suffered.

Now Matthew seems to relate the parable differently; that when our Saviour asked indeed, What will he do then to the husbandmen? the Jews answered, he will miserably destroy them. But there is no difference between the two circumstances. The Jews at first pronounced that opinion, then perceiving the point of the parable said, God forbid, as Luke here relates.

For the rulers of the people rejected Him, when they said, This man is not of God. (John 9:16.) But He was so useful and so precious, that He was placed as the head stone of the corner.

He mentions two condemnations or destructions of them, one indeed of their souls, which they suffered being offended in Christ. And He touches this when He says, Whosoever shall fall upon that stone shall be shaken to pieces. But the other of their captivity and extermination, which the Stone that was despised by them brought upon them. And He points to this when He says, But upon whomsoever it shall fall, it shall grind him to powder, or winnow him. For so were the Jews winnowed through the whole world, as the straw from the threshing floor. And mark the order of things; for first comes the wickedness committed against Him, then follows the just vengeance of God.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 20:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.