Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Saying G3004, Master G1320, Moses G3475 wrote G1125 unto us G2254, If G1437 any man's G5100 brother G80 die G599, having G2192 a wife G1135, and G2532 he G3778 die G599 without children G815, that G2443 his G846 brother G80 should take G2983 his wife G1135, and G2532 raise up G1817 seed G4690 unto his G846 brother G80.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and put to him a sh’eilah: “Rabbi, Moshe wrote for us that if a man dies leaving a wife but no children, his brother must take the wife and have children to preserve the man’s family line.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“Teacher,” they said, “Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man is to marry his brother’s widow and raise up offspring for him.
Ask
American Standard Version
and they asked him, saying, Teacher, Moses wrote unto us, that if a man’s brother die, having a wife, and he be childless, his brother should take the wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They asked him, “Rabbi, Moses wrote to us that if a man’s brother dies having a wife, and he is childless, his brother should take the wife, and raise up children for his brother.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Saying, Master, Moses wrote vnto vs, If any mans brother die hauing a wife, and hee die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise vp seede vnto his brother.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
saying, `Teacher, Moses wrote to us, If any one's brother may die, having a wife, and he may die childless--that his brother may take the wife, and may raise up seed to his brother.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,808 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 20:28 records the Sadducees' strategic question to Jesus, designed to challenge His teaching on the resurrection by presenting a hypothetical scenario rooted in the Mosaic Law of Levirate marriage. This verse introduces a pivotal theological debate concerning the nature of life after death, the continuity of earthly relationships in the resurrected state, and the authority of Scripture, setting the stage for Jesus' profound response that transcends their limited understanding.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within a series of confrontations between Jesus and various Jewish religious leaders in the Temple courts, immediately following a parable (the Parable of the Wicked Tenants in Luke 20:9-19) that exposed their rejection of God's Son. The Sadducees' question is not a genuine inquiry but a calculated attempt to discredit Jesus publicly by presenting a seemingly absurd consequence of resurrection, specifically targeting a doctrine they vehemently denied. This encounter is paralleled in Matthew 22:23-33 and Mark 12:18-27, highlighting its significance in the Synoptic tradition.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Sadducees were a prominent Jewish sect during the Second Temple period, primarily composed of aristocratic priests and wealthy landowners. Unlike the Pharisees, they accepted only the written Torah (the first five books of Moses) as authoritative Scripture and rejected oral tradition. Crucially, they denied the resurrection of the dead, the existence of angels, and the immortality of the soul, believing that life ended at death. Their question in Luke 20:28 directly references the ancient Israelite practice of Levirate marriage (Hebrew: yibbum), codified in Deuteronomy 25:5-10. This law mandated that if a man died childless, his brother was obligated to marry the widow to "raise up seed" (i.e., produce an heir) for the deceased brother, thereby preserving his name, lineage, and inheritance within Israel. The Sadducees' elaborate hypothetical involving seven brothers was intended to push this law to its logical extreme, exposing what they perceived as the absurdity of resurrection if earthly marital bonds persisted.
  • Key Themes: The passage immediately introduces several critical themes. First, it highlights The Sadducees' Rejection of the Resurrection, demonstrating their theological opposition to a core tenet of future hope for many Jews. Their question is a direct challenge to the very concept of an afterlife where individuals retain personal identity. Second, the verse explicitly references the Law of Levirate Marriage, drawing on Deuteronomy 25:5 to frame their argument. This law, intended to preserve family lines and inheritance in this life, becomes the basis for their attempt to undermine the idea of a future life. Third, and most profoundly, the Sadducees' question reveals a Misunderstanding of Divine Power and the Nature of the Resurrected Life. As Jesus later explains in Luke 20:34-38, their error stems from projecting earthly limitations and social structures onto a spiritual reality, failing to comprehend the transformative power of God in the resurrection.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • wrote (Greek, gráphō', G1125): This primary verb means "to grave," especially to write or describe. Here, it refers to Moses' act of inscribing or recording the law concerning Levirate marriage. The Sadducees appeal to the written Torah, the only part of Scripture they accepted as authoritative, underscoring their legalistic approach and their belief that Moses' law was the ultimate arbiter of truth, even in hypothetical scenarios about the afterlife.
  • wife (Greek, gynḗ', G1135): This term refers to a woman, specifically a wife. In the context of Levirate marriage, the "wife" is the childless widow of the deceased brother. The Sadducees' scenario hinges on this woman being married sequentially to seven brothers, pushing the boundaries of earthly marital relationships to challenge the concept of resurrection, implying a chaotic or absurd situation in the afterlife if such relationships persisted.
  • raise up (Greek, exanístēmi', G1817): This verb, formed from "out" (ek) and "to stand up" (anístēmi), can mean to cause to rise, to produce, or to beget. In this context, "raise up seed" (exanístēmi spérma) means to produce offspring or descendants for the deceased brother. It highlights the primary purpose of Levirate marriage: to ensure the continuation of the deceased's name and lineage, a concern deeply rooted in Israelite culture and inheritance laws.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us,": The Sadducees initiate their challenge by addressing Jesus as "Master" (didáskalos), a term of respect, while immediately appealing to the undisputed authority of Moses and the written Torah. This sets the stage for their argument, grounding it in a revered legal tradition.
  • "If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children,": This clause establishes the specific conditions for the application of the Levirate law. The critical elements are the death of a brother, the existence of his wife, and the absence of children (specifically male heirs) from that union. This scenario triggers the brother's obligation.
  • "that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.": This final clause states the prescribed action and its purpose. The surviving brother is commanded to marry the widow ("take his wife") not for his own sake, but specifically "to raise up seed" – to produce an heir – for his deceased brother, ensuring the continuation of the family name and inheritance.

Literary Devices

The Sadducees' question employs Hypothetical Scenario and Reductio ad Absurdum. They construct an extreme, multi-layered "what if" situation involving seven brothers and one woman to demonstrate what they believe to be the inherent illogicality of resurrection if earthly marriage persists. This serves as a Straw Man Argument, creating a distorted version of the resurrection (one where earthly marital bonds continue unchanged) to easily refute it. There is also an element of Irony in their appeal to Moses' law, as Jesus will later demonstrate that their error lies not in Moses' writing, but in their failure to understand the power of God and the true nature of the Scriptures they claim to uphold.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The Sadducees' question in Luke 20:28, while seemingly a legalistic challenge, probes deeply into the nature of human relationships, divine law, and the eschatological hope of resurrection. Their limited understanding of God's power and the transformed reality of the resurrection highlights a common human tendency to project present limitations onto future divine realities. Jesus' subsequent answer clarifies that the resurrected life transcends earthly institutions like marriage, not diminishing their value in this life, but revealing a higher, eternal order where believers are "like angels" and "sons of God." This passage underscores the importance of a holistic biblical theology that integrates both present realities and future hopes, grounded in God's omnipotence and His redemptive plan.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The Sadducees' flawed premise in Luke 20:28 offers a powerful lesson on the dangers of approaching spiritual truths with a purely human, materialistic, or overly literalistic mindset. Their inability to conceive of a reality beyond their present experience led them to reject a fundamental truth about God's power and future plans. For us, this passage is a call to humility and openness in our theological understanding. It reminds us that God's ways and the realities of His kingdom often transcend our current comprehension and earthly logic. We are challenged to trust in His infinite power and wisdom, even when the full scope of His future plans remains beyond our grasp. It also encourages us to consider how our own preconceived notions or limited experiences might hinder our reception of deeper spiritual truths, prompting us to continually seek God's revelation through His Word and Spirit.

Questions for Reflection

  • How might my own preconceived notions or earthly experiences limit my understanding of God's power and future realities?
  • In what areas of my faith might I be projecting present limitations onto God's infinite capabilities?
  • How does Jesus' response to the Sadducees encourage me to seek a deeper, more spiritual understanding of Scripture, rather than a purely literal or legalistic one?

FAQ

What was the Sadducees' main purpose in asking this question?

Answer: The Sadducees' primary purpose was not to seek genuine understanding but to discredit Jesus and the doctrine of the resurrection, which they rejected. By presenting a complex, seemingly absurd scenario based on the Law of Levirate marriage, they aimed to expose what they perceived as the logical inconsistencies and impracticalities of believing in an afterlife where people would be resurrected. They hoped to trap Jesus in a theological dilemma that would undermine His authority and teachings in the eyes of the people.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Luke 20:28 details a question rooted in the Old Covenant's social laws, Jesus' subsequent answer profoundly reorients our understanding towards the New Covenant reality in Christ. The Sadducees' question about earthly marriage in the resurrection reveals their failure to grasp the transformative nature of God's redemptive work, which culminates in Christ. Jesus' response, though not fully detailed in this verse, points to a resurrected life where believers are "like angels" and "sons of God," no longer bound by the temporary institutions of this age, including marriage (Luke 20:34-36). This foreshadows the ultimate fulfillment found in Christ, where believers are united not in earthly, procreative unions, but in an eternal, spiritual relationship with God as His children, adopted through the sacrifice of Jesus (Galatians 3:26-28). In Christ, the need to "raise up seed" to preserve a family name is superseded by the eternal lineage of God's family, established through faith in the resurrected Lord. Our identity and inheritance are secured not through earthly descendants, but through our union with Christ, who is the "firstfruits" of the resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:20-23). The temporary provisions of the Mosaic Law, like Levirate marriage, find their ultimate purpose and cessation in the new creation inaugurated by Jesus, where the focus shifts from earthly lineage to eternal life in Him.

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 20 verses 27–38

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

This discourse with the Sadducees we had before, just as it is here, only that the description Christ gives of the future state is somewhat more full and large here. Observe here,

I. In every age there have been men of corrupt minds, that have endeavoured to subvert the fundamental principles of revealed religion. As there are deists now, who call themselves free-thinkers, but are really false-thinkers; so there were Sadducees in our Saviour's time, who bantered the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come, though they were plainly revealed in the Old Testament, and were articles of the Jewish faith. The Sadducees deny that there is any resurrection, any future state, so anastasis may signify; not only no return of the body to life, but no continuance of the soul in life, no world of spirits, no state of recompence and retribution for what was done in the body. Take away this, and all religion falls to the ground.

II. It is common for those that design to undermine any truth of God to perplex it, and load it with difficulties. So these Sadducees did; when they would weaken people's faith in the doctrine of the resurrection, they put a question upon the supposition of it, which they thought could not be answered either way to satisfaction. The case perhaps was matter of fact, at least it might be so, of a woman that had seven husbands. Now in the resurrection whose wife shall she be? whereas it was not at all material whose she was, for when death puts an end to that relation it is not to be resumed.

III. There is a great deal of difference between the state of the children of men on earth and that of the children of God in heaven, a vast unlikeness between this world and that world; and we wrong ourselves, and wrong the truth of Christ, when we form our notions of that world of spirits by our present enjoyments in this world of sense.

1.The children of men in this world marry, and are given in marriage, huioi tou aiōnos toutou - the children of this age, this generation, both good and bad, marry themselves and give their children in marriage. Much of our business in this world is to raise and build up families, and to provide for them. Much of our pleasure in this world is in our relations, our wives and children; nature inclines to it. Marriage is instituted for the comfort of human life, here in this state where we carry bodies about with us. It is likewise a remedy against fornication, that natural desires might not become brutal, but be under direction and control. The children of this world are dying and going off the stage, and therefore they marry and give their children in marriage, that they may furnish the world of mankind with needful recruits, that as one generation passeth away another may come, and that they may have some of their own offspring to leave the fruit of their labours to, especially that the chosen of God in future ages may be introduced, for it is a godly seed that is sought by marriage (Mal 2:15), a seed to serve the Lord, that shall be a generation to him.

2.The world to come is quite another thing; it is called that world, by way of emphasis and eminency. Note, There are more worlds than one; a present visible world, and a future invisible world; and it is the concern of every one of us to compare worlds, this world and that world, and give the preference in our thoughts and cares to that which deserves them. Now observe,

(1.)Who shall be the inhabitants of that world: They that shall be accounted worthy to obtain it, that is, that are interested in Christ's merit, who purchased it for us, and have a holy meetness for it wrought in them by the Spirit, whose business it is to prepare us for it. They have not a legal worthiness, upon account of any thing in them or done by them, but an evangelical worthiness, upon account of the inestimable price which Christ paid for the redemption of the purchased possession. It is a worthiness imputed by which we are glorified, as well as righteousness imputed by which we are justified; kataxiōthentes, they are made agreeable to that world. The disagreeableness that there is in the corrupt nature is taken away, and the dispositions of the soul are by the grace of God conformed to that state. They are by grace made and counted worthy to obtain that world; it intimates some difficulty in reaching after it, and danger of coming short. We must so run as that we may obtain. They shall obtain the resurrection from the dead, that is, the blessed resurrection; for that of condemnation (as Christ calls it, Joh 5:29), is rather a resurrection to death, a second death, an eternal death, than from death.

(2.)What shall be the happy state of the inhabitants of that world we cannot express or conceive, Co1 2:9. See what Christ here says of it. [1.] They neither marry nor are given in marriage. Those that have entered into the joy of their Lord are entirely taken up with that, and need not the joy of the bridegroom in his bride. The love in that world of love is all seraphic, and such as eclipses and loses the purest and most pleasing loves we entertain ourselves with in this world of sense. Where the body itself shall be a spiritual body, the delights of sense will all be banished; and where there is a perfection of holiness there is no occasion for marriage as a preservative from sin. Into the new Jerusalem there enters nothing that defiles. [2.] They cannot die any more; and this comes in as a reason why they do not marry. In this dying world there must be marriage, in order to the filling up of the vacancies made by death; but, where there are no burials, there is no need of weddings. This crowns the comfort of that world that there is no more death there, which sullies all the beauty, and damps all the comforts, of this world. Here death reigns, but thence it is for ever excluded. [3.] They are equal unto the angels. In the other evangelists it was said, They are as the angels - ōs angeloi, but here they are said to be equal to the angels, isangeloi - angels' peers; they have a glory and bliss no way inferior to that of the holy angels. They shall see the same sight, be employed in the same work, and share in the same joys, with the holy angels. Saints, when they come to heaven, shall be naturalized, and, though by nature strangers, yet, having obtained this freedom with a great sum, which Christ paid for them, they have in all respects equal privileges with them that were free-born, the angels that are the natives and aborigines of that country. They shall be companions with the angels, and converse with those blessed spirits that love them dearly, and with an innumerable company, to whom they are now come in faith, hope, and love. [4.] They are the children of God, and so they are as the angels, who are called the sons of God. In the inheritance of sons, the adoption of sons will be completed. Hence believers are said to wait for the adoption, even the redemption of the body, Rom 8:23. For till the body is redeemed from the grave the adoption is not completed. Now are we the sons of God, Jo1 3:2. We have the nature and disposition of sons, but that will not be perfected till we come to heaven. [5.] They are the children of the resurrection, that is, they are made capable of the employments and enjoyments of the future state; they are born to that world, belong to that family, had their education for it here, and shall there have their inheritance in it. They are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection. Note, God owns those only for his children that are the children of the resurrection, that are born from above, are allied to the world of spirits, and prepared for that world, the children of that family.

IV. It is an undoubted truth that there is another life after this, and there were eminent discoveries made of this truth in the early ages of the church (Luk 20:37, Luk 20:38): Moses showed this, as it was shown to Moses at the bush, and he hath shown it to us, when he calleth the Lord, as the Lord calleth himself, the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, were then dead as to our world; they had departed out of it many years before, and their bodies were turned into dust in the cave of Machpelah; how then could God say, not I was, but I am the God or Abraham? It is absurd that the living God and Fountain of life should continue related to them as their God, if there were no more of them in being than what lay in that cave, undistinguished from common dust. We must therefore conclude that they were then in being in another world; for God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. Luke here adds, For all live unto him, that is, all who, like them, are true believers; though they are dead, yet they do live; their souls, which return to God who gave them (Ecc 12:7), live to him as the Father of spirits: and their bodies shall live again at the end of time by the power of God; for he calleth things that are not as though they were, because he is the God that quickens the dead, Rom 4:17. But there is more in it yet; when God called himself the God of these patriarchs, he meant that he was their felicity and portion, a God all-sufficient to them (Gen 17:1), their exceeding great reward, Gen 15:1. Now it is plain by their history that he never did that for them in this world which would answer the true intent and full extent of that great undertaking, and therefore there must be another life after this, in which he will do that for them that will amount to a discharge in full of that promise - that he would be to them a God, which he is able to do, for all live to him, and he has wherewithal to make every soul happy that lives to him; enough for all, enough for each.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 27–38. Public domain.
Copy as
Clement of AlexandriaAD 215
The Stromata Book 3
If anyone ponders over this answer about the resurrection of the dead, he will find that the Lord is not rejecting marriage but is purging the expectation of physical desire in the resurrection. The words “the children of this age” were not spoken in contrast to the children of some other age. It is like saying, “those born in this generation,” who are children by force of birth, being born and engendering themselves, since without the process of birth no one will pass into this life. This process of birth is balanced by a process of decay and is no longer in store for the person who has once been cut off from life here.
Origen of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 253
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The heresy of the Sadducees not only denies the resurrection of the dead, but also believes the soul to die with the body. Watching then to entrap our Saviour in His words, they proposed a question just at the time when they observed Him teaching His disciples concerning the resurrection; as it follows, And they asked him, saying, Master, Moses wrote to us, If a brother, &c.
CyprianAD 258
Treatise II. On the Dress of Virgins 22
Virgins, persevere in what you have begun to be. Persevere in what you will be. A great reward, a glorious prize for virtue, and an excellent reward for purity are reserved for you. Do you wish to know from what misery the virtue of continence is free and what advantage it provides? “I will multiply,” said God to the woman, “your sorrows and your groans, and in sorrow you will bring forth your children, and your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall have dominion over you.” You are free from this sentence. You do not fear the sorrows of women and their groans. You have no fear about the birth of children, nor is your husband your master, but your master and head is Christ, in the likeness of and in place of the man. Your fortune and condition are in common. The voice of the Lord says, “The children of this world give birth and are born. Those who will be found worthy of that world and of the resurrection from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage. They will not die anymore, for they are equal to the angels of God since they are the children of the resurrection.” What we shall be, you already have begun to be. You already have in this world the glory of the resurrection. You pass through the world without the pollution of the world. While you remain chaste and virgins, you are equal to the angels of God.
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON TATIAN’S DIATESSARON 16.22
“The Sadducees came and were saying to him, ‘There is no resurrection of the dead.’ ” They are called Sadducees, that is “the just,” because they say, “We do not serve God for the sake of reward.” They do not await the resurrection, and for this reason they call themselves “the just,” since they say, “We should love God without a reward.”
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
According to the letter of the law, a woman is compelled to marry, however unwilling, in order that a brother may raise up seed to his brother who is dead. The letter therefore killeth, but the Spirit is the master of charity.

Mystically, this woman is the synagogue, which had seven husbands, as it is said to the Samaritan, Thou hadst five husbands, (John 4:18.) because the Samaritan follows only the five books of Moses, the synagogue for the most part seven. And from none of them has she received the seed of an hereditary offspring, and so can have no part with her husbands in the resurrection, because she perverts the spiritual meaning of the precept into a carnal. For not any carnal brother is pointed at, who should raise seed to his deceased brother, but that brother who from the dead people of the Jews should claim unto himself for wife the wisdom of the divine worship, and from it should raise up seed in the Apostles, who being left as it were unformed in the womb of the synagogue, have according to the election of grace been thought worthy to be preserved by the admixture of a new seed.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Anna, Serm. 4.) As the saints claim as their own the common Lord of the world, not as derogating from His dominion, but testifying their affection after the manner of lovers, who do not brook to love with many, but desire to express a certain peculiar and especial attachment; so likewise does God call Himself especially the God of these, not thereby narrowing but enlarging His dominion; for it is not so much the multitude of His subjects that manifests His power, as the virtue of His servants. Therefore He does not so delight in the name of the God of heaven and earth, as in that of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Now among men servants are thus denominated by their masters; for we say, 'The steward of such a man,' but on the contrary God is called the God of Abraham.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
SERMON 362.18
The Sadducees were a particular sect of the Jews that did not believe in the resurrection. When the Sadducees posed this problem, the Jews were uncertain, hesitant and could not really answer it, because they assumed that flesh and blood could possess the kingdom of God, that is, the perishable could possess imperishability. Along comes Truth. The misguided and misguiding Sadducees questioned him and posed that problem to the Lord. The Lord, who knew what he was saying and who wished us to believe what we did not know, gives an answer by his divine authority which we are to hold by faith. The apostle, for his part, explained it to the extent that it was granted him. We must try to understand this as fully as we can.
Philoxenus of MabbugAD 523
ON THE INDWELLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT 1
The prophet’s words are applicable to those who sin without perceiving their sin. A sinner who has received baptism, although he may be dead toward his soul because he does not perceive his sin, he is alive to God because of the grace of baptism that he possesses. This agrees with the words “God is not of the dead but of the living, for they are all living in him.”
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
There were two heresies among the Jews, one of the Pharisees, who boasted in the righteousness of their traditions, and hence they were called by the people, "separated;" the other of the Sadducees, whose name signified "righteous," claiming to themselves that which they were not. When the former went away, the latter came to tempt Him.

(ut sup.) They devise this story in order to convict those of folly, who assert the resurrection of the dead. Hence they object a base fable, that they may deny the truth of the resurrection.

Or these seven brothers answer to the reprobate, who throughout the whole life of the world, which revolves in seven days, are fruitless in good works, and these being carried away by death one after another, at length the course of the evil world, as the barren woman, itself also passes away.

Which must not be taken as if only they who are worthy were either to rise again or be without marriage, but all sinners also shall rise again, and abide without marriage in that new world. But our Lord wished to mention only the elect, that He might incite the minds of His hearers to search into the glory of the resurrection.

Or they are equal to the angels, and the children of God, because made new by the glory of the resurrection, with no fear of death, with no spot of corruption, with no quality of an earthly condition, they rejoice in the perpetual beholding of God's presence.

Or He says this, that after having proved that the souls abide alter death, (which the Sadducees denied,) He might next introduce the resurrection also of the bodies, which together with the souls have done good or evil. But that is a true life which the just live unto God, even though they are dead in the body. Now to prove the truth of the resurrection, He might have brought much more obvious examples from the Prophets, but the Sadducees received only the five books of Moses, rejecting the oracles of the Prophets.

And since they had been defeated in argument, they ask Him no further questions, but seize Him, and deliver Him up to the Roman power. From which we may learn, that the poison of envy may indeed be subdued, but it is a hard thing to keep it at rest.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
And they asked him, saying: Teacher, Moses wrote to us, if anyone’s brother dies having a wife, and he is without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed to his brother. See the difference between the letter and the spirit. According to the letter, one is compelled to marry in life, so that the brother may raise up seed for the deceased; the spirit, however, is the measure of chastity.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
This was their main object, to rebuke Him before the people, which they were unable to do because of the wonderful wisdom of His answer.

Now the Sadducees resting upon a weak foundation, did not believe in the doctrine of the resurrection. For imagining the future life in the resurrection to be carnal, they were justly misled, and hence reviling the doctrine of the resurrection as a thing impossible they invent the story, There were seven brothers, &c.

But our Lord shows that in the resurrection there will be no fleshly conversation, thereby overthrowing their doctrine together with its slender foundation; as it follows, And Jesus said unto them, The children of this world marry, &c.

As if He said, Because it is God who worketh in the resurrection, rightly are they called the sons of God, who are regenerated by the resurrection. For there is nothing carnal seen in the regeneration of them that rise again, there is neither coming together, nor the womb, nor birth.

Or to the reason above given the Lord added the testimony of Scripture, Now that the dead are raised, Moses also showed at the bush, (Exod. 3:6.) as the Lord saith, I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. As if he said, If the patriarchs have once returned to nothing so as not to live with God in the hope of a resurrection, He would not have said, I am, but, I was, for we are accustomed to speak of things dead and gone thus, I was the Lord or Master of such a thing; but now that He said, I am, He shows that He is the God and Lord of the living. This is what follows, But he is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto him. For though they have departed from life, yet live they with Him in the hope of a resurrection.

But when the Sadducees were silenced, the Scribes commend Jesus, for they were opposed to them, saying to Him, Master, thou hast well said.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 20:28 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.