Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
He shall come and destroy these husbandmen, and shall give the vineyard to others. And when they heard it, they said, God forbid.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
He shall come G2064 and G2532 destroy G622 these G5128 husbandmen G1092, and G2532 shall give G1325 the vineyard G290 to others G243. And G1161 when they heard G191 it, they said G2036, God forbid G3361 G1096.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
He will come and put an end to those tenants and give the vineyard to others!” When the people heard this, they said, “Heaven forbid!”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
He will come and kill those tenants, and will give the vineyard to others.” And when the people heard this, they said, “May such a thing never happen!”
Ask
American Standard Version
He will come and destroy these husbandmen, and will give the vineyard unto others. And when they heard it, they said, God forbid.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He will come and destroy these farmers, and will give the vineyard to others.” When they heard it, they said, “May it never be!”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
He will come and destroy these husbandmen, and wil giue out his vineyard to others. But when they heard it, they sayd, God forbid.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
He will come, and destroy these husbandmen, and will give the vineyard to others.' And having heard, they said, `Let it not be!'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,796 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 20:16 concludes the climactic pronouncement within Jesus' Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers, revealing the severe judgment that the vineyard owner (God) would inflict upon the unfaithful husbandmen (the Jewish religious authorities). This judgment entails their destruction and the transfer of the vineyard (God's kingdom and its stewardship) to new, faithful stewards. The immediate and emphatic reaction of the audience, "God forbid," underscores their clear understanding that Jesus' pointed message was directed squarely at them and their impending accountability.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Luke 20:16 is the direct culmination of Jesus' Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers, found in Luke 20:9-19. This parable is delivered in the temple courts during Passion Week, immediately after the chief priests, scribes, and elders challenged Jesus' authority (Luke 20:1-8). The parable itself is a thinly veiled allegory, with the vineyard representing Israel or God's kingdom, the owner representing God, the servants representing the prophets sent throughout history, and the beloved son representing Jesus Himself. The husbandmen are clearly the religious leaders who are entrusted with God's people but have consistently rejected His messengers and now plot to kill His Son. The verse directly follows Jesus' rhetorical question about what the owner will do to the wicked husbandmen, providing the answer and the parable's grim conclusion.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The setting is Jerusalem, during the Passover week, a time of heightened religious and political tension. Jesus is teaching in the temple, a central hub of Jewish life and religious authority. The audience includes the very religious leaders—chief priests, scribes, and elders—who are the targets of the parable. Vineyards were a common feature of the Judean landscape, and parables involving agricultural practices would have been readily understood by the agrarian society. The concept of a landowner entrusting his vineyard to tenants was also familiar. Furthermore, the imagery of Israel as God's vineyard was deeply rooted in Old Testament prophecy, notably in Isaiah 5:1-7, which would have immediately resonated with the Jewish audience, making the parable's allegorical meaning unmistakable to those who heard it.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within Luke's Gospel and biblical theology. Foremost is the theme of Divine Judgment and Justice, demonstrating God's righteous response to persistent rebellion and rejection of His authority and messengers. It highlights that spiritual negligence and active opposition to God's plan incur severe consequences, as seen in the destruction of the husbandmen. Another crucial theme is the Rejection of God's Son, which is at the heart of the parable. The husbandmen's plot to kill the heir mirrors the religious leaders' intent to eliminate Jesus, believing they could then retain their power and control. This leads directly to the theme of the Transfer of the Kingdom, as the phrase "shall give the vineyard to others" signifies a monumental shift in stewardship and privilege. This points to the extension of God's kingdom beyond the unfaithful Jewish leadership to those who would genuinely receive the Son, including the early church composed of both Jews and Gentiles, a concept Jesus explicitly states in Matthew 21:43. Finally, the audience's reaction, "God forbid," underscores the theme of Human Resistance to Truth, revealing their dismay and aversion to the judgment, rather than a posture of repentance.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • husbandmen (Greek, geōrgós, G1092): Derived from words meaning "land" and "work," this term literally means "land-worker" or "farmer." In the parable, these are the tenants entrusted with the care and cultivation of the vineyard. The word highlights their role as stewards, implying responsibility and accountability for the produce of the vineyard. Their failure to fulfill this duty, culminating in violence against the owner's representatives and son, is the central indictment.
  • destroy (Greek, apóllymi, G622): This verb signifies to "destroy fully," "perish," or "lose." It conveys a sense of utter ruin and complete devastation. In the context of Luke 20:16, it denotes the decisive and severe judgment the owner will execute upon the unfaithful husbandmen, leading to their complete undoing and removal from their position of stewardship. It is a strong word emphasizing the finality and severity of the divine wrath.
  • God forbid (Greek, mḗ gínomai): This powerful Greek idiom, mē genoito, is an optative negation meaning "may it never happen," "by no means," or "far be it." It expresses an emphatic rejection or aversion to a proposition. The religious leaders' use of this phrase in response to Jesus' pronouncement reveals their horror and dismay at the implications of the parable, which they clearly understood to be a direct condemnation of their own actions and a prophecy of their impending judgment. It is not an expression of repentance but of a desperate wish that such a fate would not befall them.

Verse Breakdown

  • "He shall come and destroy these husbandmen": This clause identifies the owner of the vineyard (representing God) as the active agent of judgment. The phrase "shall come" implies a decisive, future action, while "destroy" emphasizes the severity and finality of the retribution against the unfaithful stewards. This points to divine justice for their chronic rebellion and rejection of God's messengers and ultimately His Son.
  • "and shall give the vineyard to others.": This second part of the owner's action signifies a transfer of stewardship and privilege. The "vineyard" (God's kingdom/Israel) will be taken from those who proved unfaithful and entrusted to "others"—those who will faithfully produce fruit and honor the owner. This foreshadows the inclusion of new, faithful people into God's covenant, extending beyond the current, unfaithful Jewish leadership.
  • "And when they heard [it], they said, God forbid.": This final clause captures the immediate and visceral reaction of Jesus' audience, specifically the religious leaders. Their exclamation, mē genoito ("God forbid" or "may it never be!"), is a strong expression of aversion, indicating that they fully grasped the parable's allegorical meaning and recognized themselves as the condemned "husbandmen." Their response is one of dismay and denial, rather than repentance or acceptance of the truth.

Literary Devices

Luke 20:16, as part of the larger parable, primarily employs Allegory, where the narrative elements (vineyard, owner, husbandmen, servants, son) systematically correspond to spiritual realities (Israel/God's kingdom, God, prophets, Jesus, Jewish leaders). The verse itself is a direct allegorical statement of divine judgment and the transfer of spiritual authority. Foreshadowing is also prominent, as Jesus' words here directly predict His own rejection and death at the hands of the religious leaders, as well as the subsequent shift in God's redemptive plan to include a broader community of believers. There is also a subtle Irony in the religious leaders' exclamation, "God forbid!" (or "May it never be!"), as their very rejection of Jesus and His message ensures that the judgment they dread will indeed come to pass.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 20:16 stands as a stark warning about accountability and stewardship within God's kingdom. Theologically, it underscores God's absolute sovereignty and His righteous judgment against those who reject His authority and abuse the privileges He bestows. The transfer of the vineyard signifies that God's redemptive purposes will not be thwarted by human rebellion; if one group proves unfaithful, God will raise up others to fulfill His will. This passage highlights the profound shift from an exclusive focus on the unfaithful Jewish leadership to a more inclusive kingdom that embraces all who respond to God's call through His Son. It affirms that spiritual privilege is always accompanied by immense responsibility, and persistent unfaithfulness ultimately leads to severe consequences and the forfeiture of that privilege.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Luke 20:16 serves as a profound call to self-examination for all who claim to be part of God's kingdom. It challenges us to consider whether we are faithfully stewarding the spiritual gifts, resources, and opportunities God has entrusted to us, or if we are, like the wicked husbandmen, seeking to exploit them for our own gain or resisting the authority of God's Son. The verse reminds us that genuine faith is demonstrated not merely by outward association with God's people, but by a heart that receives and obeys Jesus Christ and His teachings. It compels us to acknowledge that persistent rejection of God's truth and His Son will inevitably lead to divine judgment, while faithfulness opens the door to continued participation in His unfolding redemptive plan. Ultimately, this passage urges us to live lives that bear fruit for God's glory, recognizing that our ultimate responsibility is to honor the "owner" of the vineyard.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I, like the husbandmen, be tempted to resist God's authority or exploit spiritual privileges for personal gain?
  • How am I currently stewarding the "vineyard" (my gifts, resources, relationships, time) that God has entrusted to me? Am I bearing fruit for Him?
  • What does my response to God's truth reveal about my heart? Do I resist it, or do I humbly receive and obey it?
  • Considering the transfer of the vineyard to "others," how does this verse encourage me to embrace the inclusive nature of God's kingdom and participate in its expansion?

FAQ

What is the significance of the phrase "God forbid" in this verse?

Answer: The phrase "God forbid" (Greek: mē genoito) is a strong expression of aversion or emphatic denial, meaning "may it never be!" or "by no means!" In Luke 20:16, it reveals that the religious leaders understood Jesus' parable was a direct indictment of them. Their exclamation was not an act of repentance but a desperate wish that the severe judgment Jesus pronounced would not fall upon them, highlighting their dismay and resistance to the truth.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 20:16 finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in Jesus Himself, who is the "beloved son" of the vineyard owner, sent as the ultimate messenger of God's love and truth. His rejection and crucifixion by the very "husbandmen" (the religious leaders) who were entrusted with God's people directly fulfills the parable's narrative. However, the judgment pronounced in this verse also finds its fulfillment in Christ: His death, though orchestrated by wicked hands, was part of God's sovereign plan to "destroy" the power of sin and death (Hebrews 2:14). Furthermore, the transfer of the "vineyard to others" is supremely fulfilled in the establishment of the New Covenant through Christ's blood and the birth of the Church, composed of both Jews and Gentiles (Ephesians 2:11-22), who now become the true "vine" of God, with Christ as the true Vine (John 15:1-8). This signifies that God's redemptive work, though rejected by some, would ultimately be accomplished through the faithful stewardship of those who embrace Jesus as Lord and Savior, extending the kingdom to all who believe.

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 20 verses 9–19

Christ spoke this parable against those who were resolved not to own his authority, though the evidence of it was ever so full and convincing; and it comes very seasonably to show that by questioning his authority they forfeited their own. Their disowning the lord of their vineyard was a defeasance of their lease of the vineyard, and giving up of all their title.

I. The parable has nothing added here to what we had before in Matthew and Mark. The scope of it is to show that the Jewish nation, by persecuting the prophets, and at length Christ himself, had provoked God to take away from them all their church privileges, and to abandon them to ruin. It teaches us, 1. That those who enjoy the privileges of the visible church are as tenants and farmers that have a vineyard to look after, and rent to pay for it. God, by setting up revealed religion and instituted orders in the world, hath planted a vineyard, which he lets out to those people among whom his tabernacle is, Luk 20:9. And they have vineyard-work to do, needful and constant work, but pleasant and profitable. Whereas man was, for sin, condemned to till the ground, they that have a place in the church are restored to that which was Adam's work in innocency, to dress the garden, and to keep it; for the church is a paradise, and Christ the tree of life in it. They have also vineyard-fruits to present to the Lord of the vineyard. There are rents to be paid and services to be done, which, though bearing no proportion to the value of the premises, yet must be done and must be paid. 2. That the work of God's ministers is to call upon those who enjoy the privileges of the church to bring forth fruit accordingly. They are God's rent-gatherers, to put the husbandmen in mind of their arrears, or rather to put them in mind that they have a landlord who expects to hear from them, and to receive some acknowledgment of their dependence on him, and obligations to him, Luk 20:10. The Old Testament prophets were sent on this errand to the Jewish church, to demand from them the duty and obedience they owed to God. 3. That it has often been the lot of God's faithful servants to be wretchedly abused by his own tenants; they have been beaten and treated shamefully by those that resolved to send them empty away. They that are resolved not to do their duty to God cannot bear to be called upon to do it. Some of the best men in the world have had the hardest usage from it, for their best services. 4. That God sent his Son into the world to carry on the same work that the prophets were employed in, to gather the fruits of the vineyard for God; and one would have thought that he would have been reverenced and received. The prophets spoke as servants, Thus saith the Lord; but Christ as a Son, among his own, Verily, I say unto you. Putting such an honour as this upon them, to send him, one would have thought, should have won upon them. 5. That those who reject Christ's ministers would reject Christ himself if he should come to them; for it has been tried, and found that the persecutors and murderers of his servants the prophets were the persecutors and murderers of himself. They said, This is the heir, come let us kill him. When they slew the servants, there were other servants sent. "But, if we can but be the death of the son, there is never another son to be sent, and then we shall be no longer molested with these demands; we may have a quiet possession of the vineyard for ourselves." The scribes and Pharisees promised themselves that, if they could but get Christ out of the way, they should for ever ride masters in the Jewish church; and therefore they took the bold step, they cast him out of the vineyard, and killed him. 6. That the putting of Christ to death filled up the measure of the Jewish iniquity, and brought upon them ruin without remedy. No other could be expected than that God should destroy those wicked husbandmen. They began in not paying their rent, but then proceeded to beat and kill the servants, and at length their young Master himself. Note, Those that live in the neglect of their duty to God know not what degrees of sin and destruction they are running themselves into.

II. To the application of the parable is added here, which we had not before, their deprecation of the doom included in it (Luk 20:16): When they heart it, they said, God forbid, Mē genoito - Let not this be done, so it should be read. Though they could not but own that for such a sin such a punishment was just, and what might be expected, yet they could not bear to hear of it. Note, It is an instance of the folly and stupidity of sinners that they proceed and persevere in their sinful ways though at the same time they have a foresight and dread of the destruction that is at the end of those ways. And see what a cheat they put themselves, to think to avoid it by a cold God forbid, when they do nothing towards the preventing of it; but will this make the threatening of no effect? No, they shall know whose word shall stand, God's or theirs. Now observe what Christ said, in answer to this childish deprecation of their ruin. 1. He beheld them. This is taken notice of only by this evangelist, Luk 20:17. He looked upon them with pity and compassion, grieved to see them cheat themselves thus to their own ruin. He beheld them, to see if they would blush at their own folly, or if he could discern in their countenances any indication of relenting. 2. He referred them to the scripture: "What is this then that is written? How can you escape the judgment of God, when you cannot prevent the exaltation of him whom you despise and reject? The word of God hath said it, that the stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner." The Lord Jesus will be exalted to the Father's right hand. He has all judgment and all power committed to him; he is the corner-stone and top-stone of the church, and, if so, his enemies can expect no other than to be destroyed. Even those that slight him, that stumble at him, and are offended in him, shall be broken - it will be their ruin; but as to those that not only reject him, but hate and persecute him, as the Jews did, he will fall upon them and crush them to pieces - will grind them to powder. The condemnation of spiteful persecutors will be much sorer than that of careless unbelievers.

Lastly, We are told how the chief priests and scribes were exasperated by this parable (Luk 20:19): They perceived that he had spoken this parable against them; and so he had. A guilty conscience needs no accuser; but they, instead of yielding to the convictions of conscience, fell into a rage at him who awakened that sleeping lion in their bosoms, and sought to lay hands on him. Their corruptions rebelled against their convictions, and got the victory. And it was not because they had any fear of God or of his wrath before their eyes, but only because they feared the people, that they did not now fly in his face, and take him by the throat. They were just ready to make his words good: This is the heir, come let us kill him. Note, When the hearts of the sons of men are fully set in them to do evil, the fairest warnings both of the sin they are about to commit and of the consequences of it make no impression upon them. Christ tells them that instead of kissing the Son of God they would kill him, upon which they should have said, What, is thy servant a dog? But they do, in effect, say this: "And so we will; have at him now." And, though they deprecate the punishment of the sin, in the next breath they are projecting the commission of it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Eusebius of Caesarea (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 339
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The rulers of the Jewish people being now assembled together in the temple, Christ put forth a parable, foretelling by a figure the things they were about to do to Him, and the rejection that was in store for them.

But the parable which Esaias gives denounces the vineyard, whereas our Saviour's parable is not directed against the vineyard, but the cultivators of it; of whom it is added, And he let it out to husbandmen, that is, to the elders of the people, and the chief priests, and the doctors, and all the nobles.

Christ is called a stone on account of His earthly body, cut out without hands, (Dan. 2:34.) as in the vision of Daniel, because of His birth of the Virgin. But the stone is neither of silver nor gold, because He is not any glorious King, but a man lowly and despised, wherefore the builders rejected Him.
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON TATIAN’S DIATESSARON 16.19
He proposed another parable. “A certain man, a householder, planted his vineyard.” This is like what the psalmist said, “You brought a vine out of Egypt, you drove out the nations and planted it.” He protected it with a hedge, the law, and prepared a pit in it for the winepresses, the altar, and built a tower there, the temple, and sent his servants to bring him its fruit. The first, the next and the last were not received. Then he sent his Son. He was not the last, for although he appeared at the end, he already existed. John witnessed, “A man will come after me, who is before me.” He did not do this because he was unaware that the ancestors were incapable of receiving the produce but to remove the detractions of these stubborn ones from their midst. They were saying that he was not able to direct and prepare everything that he wanted to by the law, so therefore he sent his Son to impose silence on them. When they saw his Son coming, they said, “Here is the heir of the vineyard. Come! Let us kill him, and the inheritance of the vineyard will be ours.” They killed him, but their inheritance was taken away from them and given to the Gentiles. It happened just as he had said, “For to him who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance; but from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away.”
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON TATIAN’S DIATESSARON 16.20
He led them to the point of judging themselves, saying, “What do the vinedressers deserve?” They made a pronouncement concerning themselves, saying, “Let him destroy the evil ones with evil.” He then explained this, saying, “Have you not read that the stone which the builders rejected has become the head of the corner?” What stone is this? It is the one known to be as hard as lead. See, he has said, “I am setting a plumb line in the midst of the sons of Israel.” To show that he himself was this stone, he said concerning it, “Whoever knocks against that stone will be broken to pieces, but it will crush and destroy whomsoever it falls upon.” The leaders of the people were gathered together against him and wanted his downfall because his teaching did not please them. He said, “It will crush and destroy whomsoever it falls upon,” because he got rid of idolatry along with other such things. “The stone that struck the image has become a great mountain, and the whole earth has been filled with it.”
Basil of Caesarea (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 379
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
And this happens as it were to men who are condemned, having nothing to answer to the plain evidence of justice. But it is the property of Divine mercy not to inflict punishment in secret, but to foretell it with threatenings, that so it might recall men to repentance; and thus it follows here, He shall come and destroy those husbandmen.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 9.30
The vineyard prefigures us, because the people of God, founded on the root of the eternal Vine, appear above the earth, bordering the lowly ground. They now grow ripe with budding flowers. They now are clothed with dense greenery and take on a gentle yoke when they worship with mature branches as if with the twigs of the vine. The Father Almighty truly is the Vinedresser, and Christ is the Vine. We, not vine sprouts, are pruned by the sickle of the eternal cultivator if we do not bear fruit in Christ. The people of Christ then is correctly named a vineyard, either because the sign of the cross is woven on its forehead or its fruit is gathered in the last season of the year. It may also be called a vineyard because there is equal measurement in the church of God for rich and poor, humble and powerful, servants and masters. There is no difference in the church, as in all the rows of the vineyard. As the vine clings to trees, so the body is joined to the soul and the soul to the body. When the vine clings, it is raised up. When it is pruned, it is not diminished, but it increases. The people of God is stripped when it is bound, uplifted when it is humbled, crowned when it is cut back. The tender shoot cut from an old tree is grafted onto the progeny of another root. When the scars of the old shoot are cut away, the people of God likewise grow into the wood of the cross. It is as if they are cherished in the arms of a pious parent. The Holy Spirit comes as if cast down into the deep ditches of the earth and poured into this prison of the body. With the flow of saving water, the Holy Spirit washes away whatever is filthy and raises the posture of our members to heavenly discipline.
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
He rightly puts a question to them, that they may condemn themselves by their own words, as it follows, What then will the Lord of the vineyard do to them?

He says, the Lord of the vineyard will come, because in the Son is present also the Father's majesty; or because in the last times He will be more graciously present by His Spirit in the hearts of men.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Now it was not accidentally but part of the purpose of the divine dispensation that Christ came after the prophets. For God does not pursue all things at once, but accommodates Himself to mankind through His great mercy; for if they despised His Son coming after His servants, much less would they have heard Him before. For they who listened not to the inferior commands, how would they have heard the greater?
Augustine of Hippo (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 430
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(de con. Ev. lib. iv. cap. 70.) Or else, in the multitude of which we are speaking there were those who craftily asked our Lord by what authority He acted; there were those also who not craftily, but faithfully, cried aloud, Blessed is he who cometh in the name of the Lord. And so there would be some who would say, He will miserably destroy those husbandmen, and let out his vineyard to others. Which are rightly said to have been the words of our Lord Himself, either on account of their truth, or because of the unity of the members with the head; while there would be others also who would say to those who made this answer, God forbid, inasmuch as they understood the parable was spoken against themselves. It follows, And he beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner?
Cyril of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 444
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The Jewish rulers were shut out then, because they resisted their Lord's will, and made the vineyard barren which was entrusted to them. But the cultivation of the vineyard was given to the Priests of the New Testament, upon which the Scribes and Pharisees, as soon as they perceived the force of the parable, refuse to permit it, saying as follows, God forbid. They did not however escape any whit the more, because of their obstinacy and disobedience to the faith of Christ.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 134
What did the scribes and Pharisees say when they heard the parable? Their words were, "Heaven forbid!" One may see by this that having understood its more profound significance, they put away from them the impending suffering and were afraid of the coming danger. They however did not escape, because they could not be restrained from disobedience, nor would they submit to believe in Christ.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 134
The farm was given to other farmers. Who are they? I answer the company of the holy apostles, the preachers of the evangelical commandments, the ministers of the new covenant. They were the teachers of a spiritual service, and knew how to instruct people correctly and blamelessly and to lead them most excellently to everything that is pleasing to God.… The God of all plainly reveals that the farm was given to other farmers and not only to the holy apostles but also to those who come after them, although they are not from Jewish blood. He says by the voice of Isaiah to the church of the Gentiles and to the remnant of Israel, "Aliens shall stand and feed your flocks, foreigners shall be your plowmen and vinedressers." Many were called from the Gentiles, and holy people from their number became teachers and instructors. Even to this day, people of Gentile race hold high place in the churches. They are sowing the seeds of piety to Christ in the hearts of believers and making the nations entrusted to their care into beautiful vineyards in the sight of God.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The man then who plants the vineyard is the same who, according to another parable, hired labourers into his vineyard.

But it is rightly written fruit, not increase. For there was no increase in this vineyard. The first servant sent was Moses, who for forty years sought of the husbandmen the fruit of the law which he had given, but he was wroth against them, for they provoked his spirit. Hence it follows, But they beat him, and sent him away empty.

By the other servant is meant David, who was sent after the commandment of the law, that he by the music of his psalmody might stir up the husbandmen to the exercise of good works. But they on the contrary declared, What portion have we in David, neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse. (1 Sam. 20:1.). Hence it follows, And they beat him also, and entreated him shamefully, and sent him away empty. (1 Kings 12:16.) But He does not stop here, for it follows, And again he sent a third: whereby we must understand the company of prophets who constantly visited the people with their testimony. But which of the Prophets did they not persecute; as it follows, And they wounded him also, and cast him out. Now these three successions of servants, our Lord elsewhere shows to comprehend under a figure all the teachers under the law, when He says, For all those things must be fulfilled which were written in the law of Moses, and the Prophets, and the Psalms, concerning me.

But our Lord most clearly proves that the Jewish rulers crucified the Son of God not from ignorance but for envy. For they knew it was He to whom it was said, I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. (Ps. 2:8.) And they cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. (Heb. 13:12.) Because Jesus, that He might sanctify the people by His blood, suffered without the gate.

Or was He cast out of the vineyard and slain, because He was first driven out of the hearts of the unbelievers, and then fastened to the cross?

As if He said, How shall the prophecy be fulfilled, except that Christ, being rejected and slain by you, is to be preached to the Gentiles, who will believe on Him, that as the corner stone He may thus from both nations build up one temple to Himself?

Or else, He who is a sinner, yet believes on Christ, falls indeed upon the stone and is shaken, for he is preserved by penitence unto salvation. But upon whomsoever it shall fall, that is, upon whom the stone itself has come down because he denied it, it shall grind him to powder, so that not even a broken piece of a vessel shall be left, in which may be drunk a little water. Or, He means by those who fall upon Him, such as only despise Him, and therefore do not yet utterly perish, but are shaken violently so that they cannot walk upright. But upon whom it falls, upon them shall He come in judgment with everlasting punishment, therefore shall it grind them to powder, that they may be as the dust which the wind scatters from the face of the earth. (Ps. 1:4.)

(in Marc. 12.) Or understanding it morally; to every one of the faithful is let out a vineyard to cultivate, in that the mystery of baptism is entrusted to him to work out. One servant is sent, a second and a third, when the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets are read. But the servant who is sent is said to be treated despitefully or beaten, when the word heard is despised or blasphemed. The heir who is sent that man kills as far as he can, who by sin tramples under foot the Son of God. (Heb. 6:6.) The wicked husbandman being destroyed, the vineyard is given to another, when with the gift of grace, which the proud man spurned, the humble are enriched.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Or each one of the people is the vineyard, each likewise is the husbandman, for every one of us takes care of himself. Having committed then the vineyard to the husbandmen, he went away, that is, he left them to the guidance of their own judgment. Hence it follows, And went into a far country for a long time.

He says of the fruit of the vineyard, because not the whole fruit, but part only, He wished to receive. For what does God gain from us, but His own knowledge, which is also our profit.

After the prophets then had suffered all these things, the Son is delegated; for it follows, Then said the Lord of the vineyard, What shall I do? That the Lord of the vineyard speaks doubtingly, arises not from ignorance, for what is there that the Lord knows not? but He is said to hesitate, that the free will of man may be preserved.

Now He said this, not as ignorant that they would treat Him worse than they did the prophets, but because the Son ought to be reverenced by them. But if they should still be rebellious and slay Him, this would crown their iniquity. Lest therefore any should say that the Divine Presence has necessarily been the cause of their disobedience, He uses purposely this doubtful mode of speech.

Since we have already assumed the people, not Jerusalem, to be the vineyard, it may perhaps be more properly said that the people indeed slew Him without the vineyard; that is, our Lord suffered without the hands of the people, because in truth the people did not with their own hands inflict death upon Him, but delivered Him up to Pilate and the Gentiles. But some by the vineyard have understood the Scripture, which not believing they slew the Lord. And so without the vineyard, that is, without Scripture, our Lord is said to have suffered.

Now Matthew seems to relate the parable differently; that when our Saviour asked indeed, What will he do then to the husbandmen? the Jews answered, he will miserably destroy them. But there is no difference between the two circumstances. The Jews at first pronounced that opinion, then perceiving the point of the parable said, God forbid, as Luke here relates.

For the rulers of the people rejected Him, when they said, This man is not of God. (John 9:16.) But He was so useful and so precious, that He was placed as the head stone of the corner.

He mentions two condemnations or destructions of them, one indeed of their souls, which they suffered being offended in Christ. And He touches this when He says, Whosoever shall fall upon that stone shall be shaken to pieces. But the other of their captivity and extermination, which the Stone that was despised by them brought upon them. And He points to this when He says, But upon whomsoever it shall fall, it shall grind him to powder, or winnow him. For so were the Jews winnowed through the whole world, as the straw from the threshing floor. And mark the order of things; for first comes the wickedness committed against Him, then follows the just vengeance of God.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 20:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.