TRV
Translation
King James Version
And David himself saith in the book of Psalms, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
Berean Standard Bible
For David himself says in the book of Psalms: ‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at My right hand
American Standard Version
For David himself saith in the book of Psalms, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
World English Bible Messianic
David himself says in the scroll of Psalms, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at my right hand,
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Dauid himselfe sayth in the booke of the Psalmes, The Lord sayd vnto my Lord, Sit at my right hand,
Young's Literal Translation
and David himself saith in the Book of Psalms, The Lord said to my lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 25,822 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on Luke 20 verses 39–47
39 ¶ Then certain of the scribes answering said, Master, thou hast well said.
40 And after that they durst not ask him any question at all.
41 And he said unto them, How say they that Christ is David's son?
42 And David himself saith in the book of Psalms, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
43 Till I make thine enemies thy footstool.
44 David therefore calleth him Lord, how is he then his son?
45 Then in the audience of all the people he said unto his disciples,
46 Beware of the scribes, which desire to walk in long robes, and love greetings in the markets, and the highest seats in the synagogues, and the chief rooms at feasts;
47 Which devour widows' houses, and for a shew make long prayers: the same shall receive greater damnation.
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points
The scribes were students in the law, and expositors of it to the people, men in reputation for wisdom and honour, but the generality of them were enemies to Christ and his gospel. Now here we have some of them attending him, and four things we have in these verses concerning them, which we had before: -
I. We have them here commending the reply which Christ made to the Sadducees concerning the resurrection: Certain of the scribes said, Master, thou hast well said, Luk 20:39. Christ had the testimony of his adversaries that he said well; and therefore the scribes were his enemies because he would not conform to the traditions of the elders, but yet when he vindicated the fundamental practices of religion, and appeared in the defence of them, even the scribes commended his performance, and owned that he said well. Many that call themselves Christians come short even of this spirit.
II. We have them here struck with an awe of Christ, and of his wisdom and authority (Luk 20:40): They durst not ask him any questions at all, because they say that he was too hard for all that contended with him. His own disciples, though weak, yet, being willing to receive his doctrine, durst ask him any question; but the Sadducees, who contradicted and cavilled at his doctrine, durst ask him none.
III. We have them here puzzled and run aground with a question concerning the Messiah, Luk 20:41. It was plain by many scriptures that Christ was to be the Son of David; even the blind man knew this (Luk 18:39); and yet it was plain that David called the Messiah his Lord (Luk 20:42, Luk 20:44), his owner, and ruler, and benefactor: The Lord said to my Lord. God said it to the Messiah, Psa 110:1. Now if he be his Son, why doth he call him his Lord? If he be his Lord, why do we call him his Son? This he left them to consider of, but they could not reconcile this seeming contradiction; thanks be to God, we can; that Christ, as God, was David's Lord, but Christ, as man, was David's Son. He was both the root and the offspring of David, Rev 22:16. By his human nature he was the offspring of David, a branch of his family; by his divine nature he was the root of David, from whom he had his being and life, and all the supplies of grace.
IV. We have them here described in their black characters, and a public caution given to the disciples to take heed of them, Luk 20:45-47. This we had, just as it is here, Mar 12:38, and more largely Mt. 23. Christ bids his disciples beware of the scribes, that is,
1."Take heed of being drawn into sin by them, of learning their way, and going into their measures; beware of such a spirit as they are governed by. Be not you such in the Christian church as they are in the Jewish church."
2."Take heed of being brought into trouble by them," in the same sense that he had said (Mat 10:17), "Beware of men, for they will deliver you up to the councils; beware of the scribes, for they will do so. Beware of them, for," (1.) "They are proud and haughty. They desire to walk about the streets in long robes, as those that are above business (for men of business went with their loins girt up), and as those that take state, and take place." Cedant arma togae - Let arms yield to the gown. They loved in their hearts to have people make their obeisance to them in the markets, that many might see what respect was paid them; and were very proud of the precedency that was given them in all places of concourse. They loved the highest seats in the synagogues and the chief rooms at feasts, and, when they were placed in them, looked upon themselves with great conceit and upon all about them with great contempt. I sit as a queen. (2.) "They are covetous and oppressive, and make their religion a cloak and cover for crime." They devour widows' houses, get their estates into their hands, and then by some trick or other make them their own, or they live upon them, and eat up what they have; and widows are an easy prey to them, because they are apt to be deluded by their specious pretences: for a show they make long prayers, perhaps long prayers with the widows when they are in sorrow, as if they had not only a piteous but a pious concern for them, and thus endeavour to ingratiate themselves with them, and get their money and effects into their hands. Such devout men may surely be trusted with untold gold; but they will give such an account of it as they think fit.
Christ reads them their doom in a few words: These shall receive a more abundant judgment, a double damnation, both for their abuse of the poor widows, whose houses they devoured, and for their abuse of religion, and particularly of prayer, which they had made use of as a pretence for the more plausible and effectual carrying on of their worldly and wicked projects; for dissembled piety is double iniquity.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 39–47. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
They are not blamed here because they acknowledge Him to be David's Son, for the blind man for so doing was thought worthy to be healed. (Luke 18:42.) And the children saying, Hosanna to the Son of David, (Matt. 21:9.) rendered to God the glory of the highest praise; but they are blamed because they believe Him not to be the Son of God. Hence it is added, And David himself saith in the book of Psalms, The Lord said unto my Lord. (Ps. 110:1.) Both the Father is Lord and the Son is Lord, but there are not two Lords, but one Lord, for the Father is in the Son, and the Son is in the Father. He Himself sits at the right hand of the Father, for He is coequal with the Father, inferior to none; for it follows, Sit thou at my right hand. He is not honoured by sitting at the right hand, nor is He degraded by being sent. Degrees of dignity are not sought for, where is the fulness of divinity.
We must believe then that Christ is both God and man, and that His enemies are made subject to Him by the Father, not through the weakness of His power, but through the unity of their nature, since in the one the other works. For the Son also subjects enemies to the Father, in that He glorifies the Father upon earth. (John 17:6.)
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 10.1-3
Before summarizing his commandments, the Lord included the faith and mercy preceding his passion at the end of his testament. Faith is that we believe Christ is our Lord and God and sits at the right hand of God. … He rebukes those who say that Christ is the Son of David. How then did that blind man deserve healing by acknowledging the Son of David?44 How did the children, saying “Hosanna to the Son of David,” give the glory of their lofty proclamation to God? Here Jesus did not rebuke them because they acknowledged the Son of David but because they do not believe him to be the Son of God. The true faith does not confess one versus the other but both. Although at the beginning we judged to know nothing but Jesus Christ and him crucified, yet now since we are near the judgment, we already do not know Christ only crucified but also wait for him coming in the clouds. The unbeliever looks on the wounds. The faithful one is taken up and runs to meet Christ in the air. Let us therefore believe that Christ is God and man.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
David in truth was both the Father and the servant of Christ, the former indeed according to the flesh, the latter in the Spirit.
Augustine of Hippo (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 430
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Symbolo. ad Catech. l. ii. c. 7.) By the sitting we must not conceive a posture of the human limbs, as if the Father sat on the left and the Son on: the right, but the right hand itself we must interpret to be the power which that Man received who was taken up into Himself by God, that He should come to judge, who at first came to be judged.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 137
The Pharisees did not answer Christ’s question. They did this in spitefulness, or rather against their own selves, for perhaps being convicted by the inquiry the word of salvation would have shined in them. They did not wish to know the truth, but sinfully seizing for themselves the Lord’s inheritance, they denied the heir, or rather wickedly murdered him. They rejected the faith because of their love of leadership, greed for profit, and for their shameful gains.…To remove from them the habit of thinking and speaking of him in a derogatory and scornful manner, he asked them, “How do they say that Christ is David’s Son, etc.?” As I have already remarked, they were silent from malicious motives and thereby condemned themselves as unworthy of eternal life and of the knowledge of the truth.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 137
The Savior asked them, “How do they say that Christ is David’s son? David himself says in the book of Psalms, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit on my right hand until I place your enemies as a footstool under your feet.” ’ David therefore calls him Lord, and how is he his son?” The beginning of understanding is faith. He says, “If you will not believe, you cannot understand.” The examination of important truths leads to salvation. Emmanuel is the Son and the Lord of David. If anyone would learn in what way he is to understand this, he must certainly begin the exact and blameless examination of his mystery. This was kept in silence from the foundation of the world but has been revealed in the latter ages of the world.
Cyril of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 444
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Or, that He sits on the Father's right hand proves His heavenly glory. For whose throne is equal, their Majesty is equal. But sitting when it is said of God signifies a universal kingdom and power. Therefore He sitteth at the right hand of the Father, because the Word proceeding from the substance of the Father, being made flesh, putteth not off His divine glory.
We then likewise in answer to the new Pharisees, who neither confess the Son of the holy Virgin to be the true Son of God, nor to be God, but divide one son into two, put the like objections: How then is the Son of David David's Lord, and that not by human lordship, but divine?
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 137
We also will ask the Pharisees of today a similar question. They deny that he who was born of the holy Virgin is very Son of God the Father and himself also God. They also divide the one Christ into two sons. Let these people explain to us how David’s Son is his Lord, not so much as to human lordship as divine. To sit at the right hand of the Father is the assurance and pledge of supreme glory. Those who share the same throne are equal also in dignity, and those who are crowned with equal honors are understood of course to be equal in nature. To sit by God can signify nothing else than sovereign authority. The throne declares to us that Christ possesses power over everything and supremacy by right of his substance. How is the Son of David David’s Lord, seated at the right hand of God the Father and on the throne of Deity? Is it not altogether according to the unerring word of the mystery that the Word as God sprung from the very substance of God the Father? Being in his likeness and equal with him, he became flesh. He became man, perfectly and yet without departing from the incomparable excellence of the divine dignities. He continued in that state in which he had always been. He still was God, although he became flesh and in form like us. He is David’s Lord therefore according to that which belongs to his divine glory, nature and sovereignty. He is his son according to the flesh.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
And since they had been defeated in argument, they ask Him no further questions, but seize Him, and deliver Him up to the Roman power. From which we may learn, that the poison of envy may indeed be subdued, but it is a hard thing to keep it at rest.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
He said to them: How do they say that Christ is the son of David, and David himself says in the book of Psalms: The Lord said to my Lord: Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool? David therefore calls him Lord, and how is he his son? The question of Jesus profits us even today against the Jews. For those who confess that Christ is to come assert that he is a simple man and a holy man of the lineage of David. Let us therefore ask them, taught by the Lord, if he is a simple man and only the son of David, how does David call him his Lord? They are not reproved because they say he is the son of David, but because they do not believe he is the Son of God. Indeed, he is both the Lord of David, continuously being God before time, and appeared as the son of David, born as a man at the end of times. And that the enemies are subjected by the Father does not signify the weakness of the Son, but the unity of nature by which one works in the other. For the Son also subjects the enemies to the Father because he glorifies the Father on earth.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Although our Lord was shortly about to enter on His Passion, He proclaims His own Godhead, and that too neither incautiously nor boastfully, but with modesty. For He puts a question to them, and having thrown them into perplexity, leaves them to reason out the conclusion; as it follows, And he said unto them, How say they that Christ is David's son?
He manifests then that He is not opposed to the Father, but agrees with Him, since the Father resists the Son's enemies, Until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
Therefore He asks the question, and having excited their doubts, leaves them to deduce the consequence; as it follows, David therefore calleth him Lord, how is he then his son?
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Luke 20:42 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
In Jesus challenges the prevailing understanding of the Messiah's identity by quoting Psalm 110:1, a pivotal Messianic prophecy. He highlights the paradox of the Messiah being both David's descendant and, more profoundly, David's divine Lord, thereby asserting His own supreme authority and divine nature over and above a merely human, earthly kingship.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Luke 20:42 employs several significant literary devices. The most prominent is Quotation/Allusion, as Jesus directly quotes Psalm 110:1, a passage deeply revered within Jewish tradition. This allows Jesus to ground His argument in accepted scripture, demonstrating His mastery of the Law and Prophets while simultaneously reinterpreting its Messianic implications. The broader context involves a Rhetorical Question posed by Jesus in Luke 20:41, which this verse answers, forcing His opponents to confront a logical and theological dilemma. The core of Jesus's argument creates a Paradox: how can the Messiah be both David's son (human descendant) and David's Lord (divine sovereign)? This paradox serves to highlight the inadequacy of the scribes' limited understanding of the Messiah and to point towards Jesus's unique dual nature. Finally, the phrase "Sit thou on my right hand" is rich in Symbolism, representing supreme honor, authority, and shared divine power, a powerful visual metaphor for the Messiah's exaltation.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Luke 20:42 is a cornerstone for understanding the New Testament's Christology, particularly the dual nature of Jesus Christ as both fully human and fully divine. By quoting Psalm 110:1, Jesus not only asserts His pre-eminence over David but also reveals His eternal relationship with God the Father. This passage establishes the Messiah's divine Lordship as a truth rooted in the Old Testament, challenging any purely human or earthly conception of His identity. It points to the profound mystery of the Trinity, where the Father (the first "LORD") speaks to the Son (the "my Lord"), inviting Him to share His throne and authority. This divine dialogue, foreseen by David, confirms Jesus's unique status as God incarnate, the sovereign King who reigns over all creation and history.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Luke 20:42 compels us to move beyond a superficial understanding of Jesus to grasp the profound truth of His divine Lordship. It challenges us, just as it challenged the religious leaders, to recognize that Jesus is not merely a historical figure, a good teacher, or even just a great prophet, but the eternal Son of God, the sovereign Lord of all creation. This understanding should transform our worship, deepen our reverence, and inform our daily lives. If Jesus is truly "my Lord," then our response must be one of humble submission, joyful obedience, and unwavering trust in His authority and wisdom. It reminds us that our faith is not built on human philosophy or fleeting trends, but on the unshakeable truth of God's Word, which consistently points to the glorious and divine person of Jesus Christ.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is Jesus's quotation of Psalm 110:1 so significant?
Answer: Jesus's quotation of Psalm 110:1 is profoundly significant because it directly challenges the limited, human-centric understanding of the Messiah prevalent in His day. By highlighting that David himself called the Messiah "my Lord" (Adonai), Jesus demonstrates that the Messiah's identity transcends mere human lineage. This passage, therefore, serves as a crucial Old Testament witness to the Messiah's divine nature and supreme authority, establishing Him as far greater than any earthly king, even David himself. It forms a foundational argument for Jesus's own claim to divinity.
How does "Sit thou on my right hand" relate to Jesus's resurrection and ascension?
Answer: The phrase "Sit thou on my right hand" is a prophetic declaration of the Messiah's ultimate exaltation and enthronement. In the New Testament, this prophecy is understood to be definitively fulfilled by Jesus's resurrection from the dead and His subsequent ascension into heaven. After His victory over sin and death, Jesus was exalted to the highest place, taking His rightful seat at the right hand of God the Father. This signifies His supreme authority, His completed redemptive work, and His ongoing reign as King and High Priest. Passages like Acts 2:33-36 and Hebrews 1:3 explicitly connect Psalm 110:1 to Jesus's post-resurrection status.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Luke 20:42, through Jesus's masterful use of Psalm 110:1, finds its ultimate and profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. David's prophetic vision of "my Lord" sitting at Yahweh's right hand is perfectly embodied in Jesus, who is indeed both the promised "Son of David" according to His humanity (Romans 1:3) and the eternal, divine "Lord" according to His divine nature (John 1:1). His incarnation, crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension are the historical acts that confirm this ancient prophecy. Having accomplished redemption on the cross, Jesus was raised from the dead by the power of God (Acts 2:24) and ascended to heaven, where He now reigns supreme at the Father's right hand (Ephesians 1:20-22). This position signifies His completed work, His ongoing intercession for believers (Hebrews 7:25), and His absolute authority over all things, awaiting the day when all His enemies will be made His footstool (1 Corinthians 15:25). Thus, Jesus is the only one who can truly be David's Son and David's Lord, the divine Messiah who perfectly fulfills the prophetic word.